Home > Jj Abrams Star Trek Movies In Order

Jj Abrams Star Trek Movies In Order

  • UPDATED: December 1, 2023

Table of Contents

JJ Abrams Star Trek Movies in Order: A Journey through the Final Frontier

When it comes to science fiction movies, few franchises have captured the imagination of audiences quite like Star Trek. With its rich lore, captivating characters, and thought-provoking themes, Star Trek has become a cultural phenomenon that has spanned over five decades. And in 2009, director JJ Abrams took the helm to breathe new life into the beloved series with his rebooted Star Trek movies. In this article, we will take a journey through the final frontier and explore JJ Abrams’ Star Trek movies in order .

1. Star Trek (2009): The first installment of JJ Abrams’ Star Trek trilogy takes us back to the origins of the iconic crew of the USS Enterprise. This film serves as a reboot of the original series and introduces audiences to a younger version of Captain James T. Kirk (played by Chris Pine) and his loyal crew. With stunning visuals, thrilling action sequences, and a fresh take on familiar characters, Star Trek (2009) successfully reignited the franchise’s popularity.

2. Star Trek Into Darkness (2013): The second film in JJ Abrams’ trilogy delves deeper into the relationships between the crew members while introducing a formidable new villain, Khan Noonien Singh (played by Benedict Cumberbatch). As Captain Kirk faces personal and professional challenges, he must navigate a web of deception and make difficult choices that will test his leadership skills. Star Trek Into Darkness is an action-packed installment that keeps viewers on the edge of their seats.

3. Star Trek Beyond (2016): In the final chapter of JJ Abrams’ Star Trek trilogy, director Justin Lin takes over the reins to deliver an exhilarating space adventure. The crew finds themselves stranded on an uncharted planet after their ship is attacked by a ruthless alien warlord named Krall (played by Idris Elba). As they fight for survival and reunite with new allies, the crew must discover the true nature of Krall’s intentions and find a way to save the Federation. Star Trek Beyond is a fitting conclusion to Abrams’ trilogy, offering a perfect blend of action, humor, and heart.

While JJ Abrams’ Star Trek movies have faced some criticism from die-hard fans for deviating from the original series’ tone and style, they undeniably brought new life to the franchise and introduced it to a whole new generation of viewers. With their stellar cast, breathtaking visuals, and thrilling storytelling, these films successfully captured the essence of what makes Star Trek so beloved.

In addition to Abrams’ trilogy, he also served as a producer on subsequent Star Trek projects like Star Trek: Discovery and Star Trek: Picard, further expanding the universe he helped revive. Whether you’re a longtime fan or new to the series, JJ Abrams’ Star Trek movies are an exciting journey through space that should not be missed. So grab some popcorn, set your phasers to stun, and prepare for an adventure that will take you where no one has gone before.

Endante

RELATED TOPICS:

  • jj abrams star trek movies in order

guest

Related articles you'll love:

Batman and joker movies in order, hbo dc movies in order, mha show and movies in order, batman live action movies in order, how to watch batman animated movies in order, murdoch mysteries movies in order, latest articles, who is mandalorian without helmet, the mandalorian cast, carl weathers – all you need to know, maya erskine – all you need to know, finn bennett – all you need to know.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Ad Blocker Enabled!

Letterboxd — Your life in film

Forgotten username or password ?

Star Trek

Where to watch

2009 Directed by J.J. Abrams

The future begins.

The fate of the galaxy rests in the hands of bitter rivals. One, James Kirk, is a delinquent, thrill-seeking Iowa farm boy. The other, Spock, a Vulcan, was raised in a logic-based society that rejects all emotion. As fiery instinct clashes with calm reason, their unlikely but powerful partnership is the only thing capable of leading their crew through unimaginable danger, boldly going where no one has gone before. The human adventure has begun again.

Chris Pine Zachary Quinto Leonard Nimoy Eric Bana Bruce Greenwood Karl Urban Zoe Saldaña Simon Pegg John Cho Anton Yelchin Ben Cross Winona Ryder Chris Hemsworth Jennifer Morrison Rachel Nichols Faran Tahir Clifton Collins Jr. Tony Elias Sean Gerace Randy Pausch Tim Griffin Freda Foh Shen Kasia Kowalczyk Jason Brooks Sonita Henry Kelvin Yu Marta Martin Tavarus Conley Jeff Castle Show All… Billy Brown Jimmy Bennett Greg Grunberg Spencer Daniels Jeremy Fitzgerald Zoe Chernov Max Chernov Jacob Kogan Lorenzo James Henrie Colby Paul Cody Klop Akiva Goldsman Anna Katarina Douglas Tait Tony Guma Gerald W. Abrams James McGrath Jason Matthew Smith Marcus Young Bob Clendenin Darlena Tejeiro Reggie Lee Jeffrey Byron Jonathan Dixon Tyler Perry Ben Binswagner Margot Farley Paul McGillion Lisa Vidal Alex Nevil Kimberly Arland Sufe Bradshaw Jeff Chase Charles Haugk Nana Hill John Blackman Jack Millard Shaela Luter Sabrina Morris Michelle Parylak Osgood Perkins Amanda Foreman Michael Berry Jr. Lucia Rijker Pasha D. Lychnikoff Matthew Beisner Neville Page Jesper Inglis Greg Ellis Marlene Forte Leonard O. Turner Mark Bramhall Ronald F. Hoiseck Irene Roseen Jeff O'Haco Scottie Thompson Deep Roy Majel Barrett Ronnie Steadman Arne Starr Rico E. Anderson Richard Arnold Tad Atkinson Leslie Augustine Johnny Baca Diora Baird Sala Baker Leo Baligaya Corey Becker Larry Blackman Jessica Boss Neil S. Bulk Etalvia Cashin James Cawley Brad Champagne Zachary Culbertson Jeffrey De Serrano T.C. De Witt Calvin Dean Christopher Doohan Claire Doré Etienne Eckert Ken Edling Aliza Finley Ian Fisher Anna Florence Mathew Thomas Foss Massi Furlan Tommy Germanovich Jr. Mary Grace Wyatt Gray Nancy Guerriero Jarrell Hall Justin Rodgers Hall Jeffery Hauser Brad William Henke Ryan T. Husk Elizabeth Ingalls Sierra Kane Christopher Karl Johnson Jolene Kay Lauren Mary Kim Sarah Klaren Makiko Konishi Tashana Landray Daniel D. Lee Anne Leighton James Lew Jill Lover Steve Luna Aaron Lynch Justin Malachi Nav Mann Paul Marshall Owen Martin Taylor McCluskey Matthew McGregor Caitlin McKenna Andrew Mew Patrizia Milano Heidi Moneymaker Kevin Moser Jonathan Dunkerley Newkerk Westley Nguyen Jim Nieb Andres Perez-Molina Mark Phelan Damion Poitier Rahvaunia Bertrand Roberson Jr. Deborah Rombaut Leonard Jonathan Ruebe Darth Schuhe Ramona Seymour William Morgan Sheppard Katie Soo Joseph Stephens Jr. Joseph Steven T.J. Storm Kaitlin Sullivan Paul Townsend Scott Trimble Errik Tustenuggee Ravi Valleti Jason Vaughn A.J. Verel Brian Waller Steve Wharton Wil Wheaton Brianna Womick Rob Wood Lynnanne Zager

Director Director

J.J. Abrams

Assistant Directors Asst. Directors

Danny Green Hal Olofsson Tommy Gormley

Producers Producers

J.J. Abrams David Witz Damon Lindelof David Baronoff

Executive Producers Exec. Producers

Alex Kurtzman Roberto Orci Jeffrey Chernov Bryan Burk

Writers Writers

Alex Kurtzman Roberto Orci

Casting Casting

April Webster Gaby Kester Alyssa Weisberg

Editors Editors

Maryann Brandon Mary Jo Markey Lucyna Wojciechowski Julian Smirke

Cinematography Cinematography

Camera operators camera operators.

William D. Barber Philippe Carr-Forster Andrew Rowlands Colin Anderson Dale Myrand Michael P. May Daniel L. Turrett

Lighting Lighting

Hootly Weedn Christopher Prampin Joey Moran Jimmy Harritos Jesse Mather Mark Carlile John Savedra Jerry Gregoricka

Additional Photography Add. Photography

Steve Wolfe Bill Marti John Rex Woodward

Production Design Production Design

Scott Chambliss

Art Direction Art Direction

Beat Frutiger Dennis Bradford Keith P. Cunningham Gary Kosko Luke Freeborn Curt Beech Aaron Haye

Set Decoration Set Decoration

Karen Manthey Scott Herbertson Harry E. Otto William O. Hunter Kevin Cross Tex Kadonaga Anne Porter Joseph Hiura Dawn Brown Andrea Dopaso Jane Wuu Andrew Reeder

Special Effects Special Effects

Richard Ratliff Richard Kennedy Burt Dalton Tony Vandenecker Michael Roundy Jay Bartus Jeremiah Cooke Curtis Decker Eric Dressor Clark James Chris Jones Joe Judd David Mesloh Jesse Orozco Jeff Pepiot Bryan Phillips Walter Polan Christopher A. Suarez Jonathan Tang Dennis Yeager II Jim Jolly

Visual Effects Visual Effects

Jill Brooks Neville Page Roger Guyett Russell Earl Thomas Nittmann Edson Williams Daniel P. Rosen Matt McDonald Jeff Olson Kelly Port Stefano Trivelli Paul Kavanagh Shari Hanson Eric Withee Erik Gamache

Title Design Title Design

Andrew Kramer

Stunts Stunts

Sala Baker Chris Palermo Lauren Mary Kim Damion Poitier Peter Epstein Zack Duhame Anthony N. Heidi Moneymaker Shauna Duggins Kimberly Shannon Murphy

Composer Composer

Michael Giacchino

Sound Sound

Scott Martin Gershin Mark P. Stoeckinger David Giammarco Tim Gomillion Paul Massey Cory Mandel Glenn T. Morgan Ben Wilkins Robin Harlan Randy Singer Alan Rankin Andy Nelson Tim Walston Sarah Monat Ann Scibelli Matt Patterson Anna Behlmer David Barbee Geoffrey G. Rubay Peter J. Devlin Phillip W. Palmer Dennis Rogers Mark Ormandy

Costume Design Costume Design

Michael Kaplan

Makeup Makeup

Barney Burman Richard Alonzo Richard Redlefsen Greg Funk Mark Garbarino Mike Smithson Margaret Prentice James MacKinnon Mindy Hall René Dashiell Kerby Ned Neidhardt Jay Wejebe Jamie Kelman Jed Dornoff Susan Stepanian Rebecca Alling Kimberly Felix Lygia Orta Bonita DeHaven Brian Sipe Ron Pipes Andy Clement Cynthia Hernandez Debra Coleman Tammy Ashmore Stephen Bettles Dave Snyder Tina Hoffman Marianna Elias Earl Ellis

Hairstyling Hairstyling

Erwin H. Kupitz Terry Baliel Jules Holdren Ginger Damon David Larson Ketty Gonzalez Colleen LaBaff Teressa Hill Bob Kretschmer Maynard Matthews Jason Green Lana Heying Rhonda O'Neal Nicole DeFrancesco

Paramount Spyglass Entertainment Bad Robot

Releases by Date

06 may 2009, 07 may 2009, 08 may 2009, 13 may 2009, 15 may 2009, 29 may 2009, 05 jun 2009, 09 jun 2009, 26 aug 2009, 04 nov 2009, 05 nov 2009, 16 nov 2009, 05 sep 2016, 07 oct 2011, releases by country.

  • Theatrical M

Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela

  • Theatrical 12
  • Theatrical C
  • Theatrical 11
  • Theatrical TP
  • Theatrical 13
  • Theatrical הותר לכל
  • Theatrical T

Netherlands

  • Physical 12 DVD, Blu ray
  • TV 12 RTL 5

New Zealand

  • Theatrical 12 Age Limit: 11

Philippines

  • Theatrical M/12

Russian Federation

  • Theatrical 16+

South Africa

South korea.

  • Physical 11 DVD, Blu-ray
  • Physical 15 4K UltraHD

Switzerland

  • Theatrical PG-13
  • Theatrical 12A
  • Physical 12 DVD
  • Theatrical 12+

127 mins   More at IMDb TMDb Report this page

Popular reviews

Matthew L. Brady

Review by Matthew L. Brady ★★★★ 2

You can say whatever you want about the new Star Trek movies, but he nailed Chekov.

R.I.P Anton Yelchin

a ☭

Review by a ☭ ★★★★

As soon as Simon Pegg came on screen I audibly gasped and then I had to go through intense emotional abuse while seeing Simon Pegg be fucking dragged through water and almost die

zelda

Review by zelda ★★★★ 5

do you ever rewatch this movie and then realize how unbelievably kinky it is that kirk yells at spock until he chokes him out in front of like 30 people

Lucy

Review by Lucy ★★★★½

they boldly went™

lauren

Review by lauren ★★★★½

GOD i love chris pine, lens flares and *clenches fist* space

rowan

Review by rowan ★★★★

during this my friend told me she never knew spock was an alien and she "just thought he was trendy"

matt lynch

Review by matt lynch ★★★★ 3

J.J. Abrams is Michael Bay if he were successfully trying to be a really nice person.

ellie ✨

Review by ellie ✨ ★★★★★ 5

no group viewing of new-trek is complete without someone commenting on how hot chris pine is every 5 minutes

feat. dante from the dmc series

Review by feat. dante from the dmc series ★★★★ 2

chekov is the sweetest boy

Review by ellie ✨ ★★★★★

space is gay

Nakul

Review by Nakul ★★★

I've never seen Star Trek - not a single episode of the original series, the later versions or any of the old movies. And this JJ Abram's reboot did a good job of introducing me to the world and the main characters. This is a fun summer adventure with great cast and wall-to-wall action but has a terribly weak villain and the plot moves so fast, it's exhausting. This movie feels like a Michael Bay movie (with empathy) and what's with the constant revolving and an over abundance of Dutch angle and lens flares, it was really distracting.

Hunter Morris

Review by Hunter Morris 4

Karl Urban’s “Bones” McCoy could have solved this pandemic in a day, and I now trust no one else to get the job done.

Related Films

Star Trek Into Darkness

Similar Films

Star Wars: The Force Awakens

Mentioned by

LG OLED MOVIE CLUB

Select your preferred poster

Upgrade to remove ads.

Letterboxd is an independent service created by a small team, and we rely mostly on the support of our members to maintain our site and apps. Please consider upgrading to a Pro account —for less than a couple bucks a month, you’ll get cool additional features like all-time and annual stats pages ( example ), the ability to select (and filter by) your favorite streaming services, and no ads!

In defense of the J.J. Abrams Star Trek movies

J.J. Abrams' Star Trek movies dared to go boldly go where 'some men' had gone before.

In Defense of the J.J Abrams Star Trek Movies: image shows JJ Abrams on Star Trek set

For a fanbase as passionate as the one Star Trek has collected over the years, change is often met with collective suspicion rather than communal excitement.

Star Trek is sacred, and those who cut their teeth on the William Shatner -starring original series or the much loved Next Generation are fiercely protective of their darling franchise. Anyone brave enough to reimagine the series for new audiences has a cosmically high bar to leap, with many believing the task to be a no-win scenario (a ' kobayashi maru ', perhaps?).

In the age of remakes, remasters and reimaginings, Star Trek has seen numerous iterations of its winning formula, some garnering success and others catastrophic failure. Losses be damned, though, as when it does succeed, the seasoned sci-fi franchise does so in spectacular fashion.

While shows like Discovery and Lower Decks take us to a new branch of Starfleet or a new story in the Star Trek universe, the 2009 self-titled film tackles the Kirk and Spock story head on, and it's bravery is rewarded. The 2009 film is a masterclass in contemporary science fiction, and by building Kirk and Spock respectively and setting them for a collision course in the film's opening act, it reminds us of the pair's polarizing differences, as well as their critical similarities.

It’s a new Star Trek for a new audience, and in forging something fitting for the current climate of films and media it’s crucial that the seasoned franchise makes small, yet significant differences to ensure that new releases don’t feel like a relic from the past.

Leap Before You Look 

The success of the Star Trek license has been a result of a winning formula; one that’s sure to capture the hearts of many, and - critically - is future-proofed to continue to appeal to new fans. J.J. Abrams and Bad Robot Productions didn’t do away with what made the original series special (unlike some sci-fi properties), instead they reflected on the past and evolved them significantly. Thus, the Kelvin timeline was born.

Old friends and new alliances prop up the plot of the first in the trilogy, and the familiar face of series icon Leonard Nimoy is simply a wonderful wrinkle that pays dividends. The passing of the torch from Nimoy to Quinto was simply excellent, and though the role was somewhat short-lived for the Heroes actor, it was more than prosperous as his performance as the stoic, yet compassionate Spock impressed critics and fans alike. In fact, it's hard to pluck a bad or out of place performance from the entire trilogy, as the glut of talented actors presented offer some of their best to date. 

It has to be said, however, that though the performances remain top notch, it's evident that some of the magic is lost as the trilogy develops. Into Darkness reintroduces us to an iconic villain but lacks the emotional weight of the first and while Beyond provides more of the USS Enterprise crew that we’ve come to love, it does have an air of the 'soulless Summer blockbuster' feel to it. What makes the trilogy more than a one hit wonder is Abrams and co’s ability to develop authentic, grounded and human character quirks for a whole host of personalities that are often anything but.

Star Trek Into Darkness was largely a victim of a poor release window. Set out into a world cluttered by cookie-cutter offerings in the MCU like Ironman 3 and lackluster Shyamalan sci-fi attempts like After Earth, the consensus was that it didn’t offer much that the scores of other summer blockbusters didn’t. It’s a great film, and a continuation of a story that thoroughly deserved another chapter in the tale. The chemistry of the Enterprise crew is as good as it’s ever been and the injection of a menacing villain was a much needed correction to the only significant flaw of the first film.

Beyond was helmed by Justin Lin of Fast and Furious fame, and while he brought his own flavour to the franchise (and far fewer lense flares), it saw our heroes depart on a fun --albeit linear-- adventure that served as a platform for the already-developed characters to flourish. No origin story was necessary to maintain the viewers’ attention, as the chemistry that three films across seven years had forged between the actors and their respective roles.

Furthermore, the somewhat vague reports of Quentin Tarantino circling the Star Trek IP is enticing to anyone familiar with his previous work, and though many believe the recent trilogy to be concluded, there's always a possibility of a continuation, and the Pulp Fiction director's supposed interest is enough to garner more than a little excitement. Will it happen? Who knows, but it's enough to make keen cinephiles (Star Trek fan or not) curious.

The trilogy is flawed, yes, but with the franchise providing less-than-stellar action sequences and over the top acting in decades past, it's clear to viewers that Star Trek wears its flaws on its sleeve. In truth, most of said viewers would find such blemishes charming rather than distracting, and a reminder that the franchise has always blazed new trails rather than retreading old ones. 

Like James T. Kirk and his father before him, Star Trek is a franchise that always leaps before it looks, which has resulted in a few harsh lessons and more than a few home runs. A quick glance at our Star Trek movies, ranked worst to best article will show that when J.J was firing on all cylinders, his Trek movies were up there with the best of them.

To Boldly Go... 

Nostalgia is a frightfully difficult impulse to overcome. When we find something we love in fiction, the characters, its stories and the adventures that they take us on are forever etched into our minds, only maturing with age to the point where the rose-tinted spectacles are in full effect.

To many, Star Trek was the first series that took our impressionable minds to the moon and back, providing hours of escapism amongst the stars and allowing us a glimpse at what the future could be like.

As the swinging 60's stretch further into the rear view mirror and Star Trek's humble beginnings feel even more humble in comparison to modern CGI, the JJ Abrams-produced  trilogy is proof that, in the face of immense adversity, the franchise still has more to give.

Abrams' take on the seasoned sci-fi franchise provides bright-eyed viewers of today the opportunity to feel the same way our parents and grandparents felt the first time their screen was graced by the frightful Gorn or the sinister Khan. It's made Star Trek fans of the sons and daughters of those faithful Trekkies from decades past, which is all the evidence you need to believe that J.J. Abrams created something truly special.

If you're looking to revisit the latest Star Trek trilogy, check out our Star Trek streaming guide to find out where you can watch the movies online. And if you're wondering where the Kelvin movies fit into the rest of the Trek timeline, well it's complicated, but our Star Trek movies in chronological order guide explains it all.

Join our Space Forums to keep talking space on the latest missions, night sky and more! And if you have a news tip, correction or comment, let us know at: [email protected].

Get the Space.com Newsletter

Breaking space news, the latest updates on rocket launches, skywatching events and more!

This Week In Space podcast: Episode 101 — Nukes in Space

'Space: The Longest Goodbye' is an intimate glimpse at how astronauts cope with isolation (review)

10 things you probably didn't know about the 2024 total solar eclipse

Most Popular

By Conor Feehly January 05, 2024

By Keith Cooper December 22, 2023

By Fran Ruiz December 20, 2023

By Fran Ruiz December 19, 2023

By Fran Ruiz December 18, 2023

By Tantse Walter December 18, 2023

By Robert Lea December 05, 2023

By Robert Lea December 04, 2023

By Robert Lea December 01, 2023

By Rebecca Sohn November 27, 2023

By Fran Ruiz November 21, 2023

  • 2 The next chapter of lunar exploration could forever change the moon — and our relationship to it (op-ed)
  • 3 This Week In Space podcast: Episode 101 — Nukes in Space 
  • 4 NASA, Boeing delay Starliner capsule's 1st astronaut launch to early May
  • 5 Benro Tortoise 24C tripod and GX30 head review
  • International edition
  • Australia edition
  • Europe edition

Star Trek

Y ou want "bromance"? I'll give you bromance - the greatest of them all. It's the bromance that flowers in this wildly exciting and enjoyable summer action movie, about the manly relationship between a mercurially talented starship commander and his mixed-race first officer, whose virile otherness is signalled by discreetly tapering pointy ears, eyebrows in a thick geometric frown and that extraordinary straight fringe, a hairdo he must maintain in front of the bathroom mirror every night with a ruler and pair of scissors.

Why have we filmgoers wasted so much of our time and attention on all those other beta-male bondings and under-par buddy hookups when the greatest friendship of all was right there under our noses? The story of Kirk and Spock is brought thrillingly back to life by a new first generation: Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto, who give inspired, utterly unselfconscious and lovable performances, with power, passion and some cracking comic timing. It's a film in which my chief emotion was a kind of grinning embarrassment at enjoying it all quite so much.

This is Star Trek: The Early Years, the story of the Enterprise crew when they were teen- to twentysomethings with some serious cadet attitude. Their fledgling relationships are dramatised and interspersed with spectacular action sequences, juxtaposing the "nighttime" effect of deep space with the sunlit, parched alien planets on which the stars find themselves crash-landing. For people like me who grew up watching Star Trek movies and feeling secretly shocked at how old Shatner, Nimoy et al looked compared to their lithe selves on the TV show - well, this makes for an extra blast of pure energy.

Director JJ Abrams and screenwriters Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman have found a cunning way of rewriting the backstory. Hateful Romulan Nero, played by Eric Bana, enraged by what he (wrongly) sees as Spock's destruction of his home planet, travels backwards in time with a mission to destroy the future authors of his people's misfortune. James T Kirk's father, who was originally to grow happily old, witnessing his son's glorious rise through the Star Fleet ranks, now dies in a Romulan attack, after he gets his pregnant wife to safety - and she excitingly gives birth to Jim in the escape module itself. And so we are given a new, parallel-universe early story of the Enterprise.

Without his dad's calming influence, Jim grows up a tearaway and a wrong 'un: there is a fantastic sequence in which he crashes his uncle's vintage sports car while pursued by a hi-tech robo-speed-cop. After being beaten senseless in a bar fight, Kirk is redemptively recruited to the fleet by a friend of his late father: wise Capt Christopher Pike (Bruce Greenwood). Meanwhile, the bookish and earnest young Spock (Quinto), is bullied by his Vulcan classmates for having a human mother - played by Winona Ryder - and made the subject of racist condescension by his Vulcan elders, who refer to his human ancestry as a disability. Incensed, Spock joins the human Starfleet and instantly becomes a star pupil.

In fact, it looks very much as if Spock, not Kirk, will be the star of the film as well, and the Kirk-Spock friendship is to ignite in rivalry and even violence. Spock has what first seems like the greater leadership potential, and to Jim's chagrin, the beautiful African-American crew-member Uhura (Zoe Saldana) seems to like Spock more. Spock also gets a powerfully surreal (and not entirely, ahem, logical) meeting with his older self: Leonard Nimoy contributes a performance of gentle, other-worldly dignity, and it is this older Spock, over the closing credits, who gets to recite the legendary words about the mission to seek out new life, new civilisations. The final words are, incidentally, politically corrected to "where no one has gone before".

What a treat it is to see the bridge of the USS Enterprise, box fresh and gleaming new: it is quite irrationally exciting to hear that strange, echoey-tweety heartbeat of the shipboard computer-system, the klaxon alarm in moments of peril, and the fsssht-fsssht of the automatic doors opening and closing. It is weird, in 2009, to see the 1960s UN-style ethos preserved, with the mini-skirt costumes for female personnel and toddler pyjama-tops for the guys. Then, as now, there's an American at the helm, but other nations, and present and former foes are generously represented: the Russian Chekhov (Anton Yelchin) and the Japanese Sulu, played by the Korean-American actor John Cho. As in the 60s, however, Starfleet unfortunately feels no great conciliatory need to include anyone from the Middle East. Britain's Simon Pegg plays the engineer Scotty, and beings his own distinctive shtick to the part, and Karl Urban is Bones, the gruff medic - of all the current cast, he seems the one nearest in age to the original.

Unlike George Lucas's massively encumbered and obese Star Wars prequel-trilogy, this new Star Trek is fast-moving, funny, exciting warp-speed entertainment and, heaven help me, even quite moving - the kind of film that shows that, like it or not, commercial cinema can still deliver a sledgehammer punch. It sure didn't feel like a trek to me.

  • Action and adventure films
  • Science fiction and fantasy films
  • Star Trek (Culture)
  • Star Trek (Film)
  • Zoe Saldana

More on this story

star trek movies by jj abrams

Will Star Trek live long and prosper at the box office?

star trek movies by jj abrams

Who's who in JJ Abrams's Star Trek

Jj abrams's star trek: 'i went in fearing the worst, i came out a convert'.

star trek movies by jj abrams

JJ Abrams: 'I never got Star Trek'

star trek movies by jj abrams

Enterprise reprised

Star trek's eric bana: 'the film's almost made for the non-fan', most viewed.

  • Search Search Please fill out this field.
  • Sweepstakes

J.J. Abrams teases the return of his original cast in new Star Trek film

Maureen Lee Lenker is a senior writer at Entertainment Weekly with over seven years of experience in the entertainment industry. An award-winning journalist, she's written for Turner Classic Movies, Ms. Magazine , The Hollywood Reporter , and more. She's worked at EW for six years covering film, TV, theater, music, and books. The author of EW's quarterly romance review column, "Hot Stuff," Maureen holds Master's degrees from both the University of Southern California and the University of Oxford. Her debut novel, It Happened One Fight , is now available. Follow her for all things related to classic Hollywood, musicals, the romance genre, and Bruce Springsteen.

star trek movies by jj abrams

Star Trek is ready to boldly go where they've gone three times before.

On Tuesday, J.J. Abrams announced plans for a fourth Star Trek film at the Paramount Investors Day presentation. The film will be directed by Matt Shakman ( WandaVision ) with Abrams producing, and the aim is to bring back many of Abrams' original stars from his 2009 reboot of the long-running franchise.

"We are thrilled to say that we are hard at work on a new Star Trek film that will be shooting by the end of the year that will be featuring our original cast and some new characters that I think are going to be really fun and exciting and help take Star Trek into areas that you've just never seen before," Abrams said. "We're thrilled about this film, we have a bunch of other stories that we're talking about that we think will be really exciting, so can't wait for you to see what we're cooking up. But until then, live long and prosper."

However, EW has learned that the studio has yet to enter negotiations with that original cast at this juncture. The cast features a litany of high profile names, including Chris Pine as Captain Kirk, Zachary Quinto as Spock, Zoe Saldana as Uhura, John Cho as Sulu, Karl Urban as Bones, and Simon Pegg as Scotty. Anton Yelchin , who featured as Chekhov in Abrams' previous three entries , died in 2016 before the previous film in the franchise, Star Trek Beyond , hit theaters.

The new film will feature a screenplay by Josh Friedman ( Avatar 2 ) and Cameron Squires ( WandaVision ) based on a earlier draft by Lindsey Beer ( Sierra Burgess Is a Loser ) and Geneva Robertson-Dworet ( Captain Marvel ).

With his 2009 film, Abrams reset the Star Trek timeline, originally established in Gene Roddenberry's 1960s groundbreaking sci-fi television series. He followed it up with 2013's Star Trek Into Darkness, but the last time the characters' were seen on the big screen was in 2016's Star Trek Beyond, which Abrams produced with Justin Lin directing.

Plans to bring them back — including a 2018 announced sequel set to team Pine with Kirk's late father as portrayed by Chris Hemsworth in the 2009 film — have stuttered along the way. For a time, Quentin Tarantino was even circling a project .

Of late, Star Trek fans have turned back to television for new content on series Picard and Star Trek Discovery.

Want more movie news? Sign up for Entertainment Weekly 's free newsletter to get the latest trailers, celebrity interviews, film reviews, and more.

Related content:

  • See Whoopi Goldberg reprise her beloved Star Trek role as Guinan on Picard
  • Sonequa Martin-Green takes the chair as captain in Star Trek: Discovery season 4 trailer
  • Star Trek Beyond: Where does Star Trek go?

Log in or sign up for Rotten Tomatoes

Trouble logging in?

By continuing, you agree to the Privacy Policy and the Terms and Policies , and to receive email from the Fandango Media Brands .

By creating an account, you agree to the Privacy Policy and the Terms and Policies , and to receive email from Rotten Tomatoes and to receive email from the Fandango Media Brands .

By creating an account, you agree to the Privacy Policy and the Terms and Policies , and to receive email from Rotten Tomatoes.

Email not verified

Let's keep in touch.

Rotten Tomatoes Newsletter

Sign up for the Rotten Tomatoes newsletter to get weekly updates on:

  • Upcoming Movies and TV shows
  • Trivia & Rotten Tomatoes Podcast
  • Media News + More

By clicking "Sign Me Up," you are agreeing to receive occasional emails and communications from Fandango Media (Fandango, Vudu, and Rotten Tomatoes) and consenting to Fandango's Privacy Policy and Terms and Policies . Please allow 10 business days for your account to reflect your preferences.

OK, got it!

Movies / TV

No results found.

  • What's the Tomatometer®?
  • Login/signup

star trek movies by jj abrams

Movies in theaters

  • Opening this week
  • Top box office
  • Coming soon to theaters
  • Certified fresh movies

Movies at home

  • Netflix streaming
  • Amazon prime
  • Most popular streaming movies
  • What to Watch New

Certified fresh picks

  • Dune: Part Two Link to Dune: Part Two
  • Love Lies Bleeding Link to Love Lies Bleeding
  • Orion and the Dark Link to Orion and the Dark

New TV Tonight

  • The Regime: Season 1
  • The Gentlemen: Season 1
  • The Reluctant Traveler With Eugene Levy: Season 2
  • Queens: Season 1
  • Blown Away: Season 4
  • Animal Control: Season 2
  • The Cleaning Lady: Season 3
  • Alert: Missing Persons Unit: Season 2
  • Hot Wheels: Let's Race: Season 1

Most Popular TV on RT

  • Shōgun: Season 1
  • Avatar: The Last Airbender: Season 1
  • The Tourist: Season 2
  • The Signal: Season 1
  • One Day: Season 1
  • Halo: Season 2
  • Supersex: Season 1
  • House of Ninjas: Season 1
  • Best TV Shows
  • Most Popular TV
  • TV & Streaming News
  • Prime Video

Certified fresh pick

  • Elsbeth: Season 1 Link to Elsbeth: Season 1
  • All-Time Lists
  • Binge Guide
  • Comics on TV
  • Five Favorite Films
  • Video Interviews
  • Weekend Box Office
  • Weekly Ketchup
  • What to Watch

100 Best Movies on Tubi (March 2024)

Oscars 2024 Best Picture Nominees Ranked by Tomatometer

Women’s History

Awards Tour

Awards Leaderboard: Top Movies of 2023

22 Films We Can’t Wait to See at SXSW 2024

  • Trending on RT
  • Play Movie Trivia
  • Oscar Predictions
  • Awards Leaderboard
  • Oscars Ballot

2009, Sci-fi/Adventure, 2h 6m

What to know

Critics Consensus

Star Trek reignites a classic franchise with action, humor, a strong story, and brilliant visuals, and will please traditional Trekkies and new fans alike. Read critic reviews

You might also like

Where to watch star trek.

Watch Star Trek with a subscription on Apple TV+, Paramount Plus, rent on Apple TV, Amazon Prime Video, Vudu, or buy on Apple TV, Amazon Prime Video, Vudu.

Rate And Review

Super Reviewer

Rate this movie

Oof, that was Rotten.

Meh, it passed the time.

It’s good – I’d recommend it.

So Fresh: Absolute Must See!

What did you think of the movie? (optional)

You're almost there! Just confirm how you got your ticket.

Step 2 of 2

How did you buy your ticket?

Let's get your review verified..

AMCTheatres.com or AMC App New

Cinemark Coming Soon

We won’t be able to verify your ticket today, but it’s great to know for the future.

Regal Coming Soon

Theater box office or somewhere else

By opting to have your ticket verified for this movie, you are allowing us to check the email address associated with your Rotten Tomatoes account against an email address associated with a Fandango ticket purchase for the same movie.

You're almost there! Just confirm how you got your ticket.

Star trek videos, star trek   photos.

Aboard the USS Enterprise, the most-sophisticated starship ever built, a novice crew embarks on its maiden voyage. Their path takes them on a collision course with Nero (Eric Bana), a Romulan commander whose mission of vengeance threatens all mankind. If humanity would survive, a rebellious young officer named James T. Kirk (Chris Pine) and a coolly logical Vulcan named Spock (Zachary Quinto) must move beyond their rivalry and find a way to defeat Nero before it is too late.

Rating: PG-13 (Sci-Fi Action|Brief Sexual Content|Violence)

Genre: Sci-fi, Adventure, Action, Fantasy

Original Language: English

Director: J.J. Abrams

Producer: J.J. Abrams , Damon Lindelof

Writer: Roberto Orci , Alex Kurtzman

Release Date (Theaters): May 7, 2009  wide

Rerelease Date (Theaters): Sep 8, 2023

Release Date (Streaming): Aug 1, 2013

Box Office (Gross USA): $257.7M

Runtime: 2h 6m

Distributor: Paramount Pictures

Production Co: Bad Robot

View the collection: Star Trek

Cast & Crew

James T. Kirk

Zachary Quinto

Leonard Nimoy

Spock Prime

Bruce Greenwood

Capt. Christopher Pike

Dr. Leonard "Bones" McCoy

Zoe Saldana

Montgomery "Scotty" Scott

Anton Yelchin

Winona Ryder

Amanda Grayson

Chris Hemsworth

George Kirk

Jennifer Morrison

Winona Kirk

Rachel Nichols

Faran Tahir

Capt. Robau

Clifton Collins Jr.

J.J. Abrams

Roberto Orci

Screenwriter

Alex Kurtzman

Damon Lindelof

Executive Producer

Jeffrey Chernov

Michael Giacchino

Original Music

Cinematographer

Maryann Brandon

Film Editing

Mary Jo Markey

Scott Chambliss

Production Design

Michael Kaplan

Costume Design

Keith P. Cunningham

Supervising Art Direction

Art Director

Dennis Bradford

Luke Freeborn

Beat Frutiger

News & Interviews for Star Trek

New on Netflix in July 2021

87 Fearless Women Movie Heroes Who Inspire Us

Your Epic Movie Franchise Binge Guide: The Best Way to Watch the Biggest Series

Critic Reviews for Star Trek

Audience reviews for star trek.

Thanks to sleek direction and a strong script, Star Trek is the true definition of a blockbuster - managing to both satisfy longtime fans while appealing to all demographics with fun and intense action with some of the best visual effects ever put to screen.

star trek movies by jj abrams

It came as a shock to many people when it was announced that Paramount Pictures would make a new "Star Trek" movie that would reboot the franchise. But when the movie came out, pretty much everybody agreed that it was pretty good. This movie is awesome! J.J. Abrams managed to make a movie with some incredible acting and a really good story. The new actors were all pretty good and, of course, Leonard Nimoy who returned to play the older version of Spock proved that he still got it. The weaknesses of this movie are the visual effects when it comes to the creatures and then the villain who is incredibly weak. I didn't think that they had gave him a good reason for him to do what it is that he does. However, I still love this movie and I can't wait to see where this franchise will be going.

Plenty Star Trek super fans stand by the notion that the rebooted/re-imagination that J.J. Abrams brought us in 2009 should not be considered canon or even a part of the franchise. I tend to believe Abrams did right by the franchise's history and pathed the correct way to take the series. That's not to say the film doesn't ask its audience to take some leaps of faith, they certainly do. Beginning with an entirely new cast of actors playing iconic characters. Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Zoe Saldana, Karl Urban, John Cho, Simon Pegg, and the late Anton Yelchin surrounded the film with impressive young talent. Luckily, they all fit right in with the actors who previously played the crew of the Starship Enterprise, while also bringing a fresh new face to the front of the franchise. Much like 2015's The Force Awakens, J.J. Abrams took a relatively simple and safe approach to revamping the series with Star Trek. Take the villain for example, Nero, he's a vengeful leader of a race who demands payback against those who wronged him. In this case those people are one, in Spock. Though Eric Bana is unrecognizable and quite good as Nero, he's sort of an antagonist doing antagonistic things just so that Kirk and Spock can have something to overcome. As it is a reimagining of sorts for the crew, we get to see Spock, Kirk, and even Uhura in places we've never seen them, both physically and emotionally. I particularly enjoyed the much more involved Uhura, though I'm not sure she needed to have a romantic relationship with Spock. But it does also provide us with a more unplugged version of Spock, though obviously still emotionally guarded. In all, the characters still feel like the same old Enterprise characters from the old films and series, just with a fresh spin. And that's okay Trek fans. Of course, there are quite a few gaps in the storytelling. After a highly emotional beginning with a great expanded cameo from Chris Hemsworth (up and comer at the time), I don't think the film ever reaches those gut punching heights, so from that angle, the film doesn't necessarily succeed. At other times, events happen that aren't explained well enough and warrant perhaps too much suspension of disbelief. With that said, once Leonard Nimoy steps into the film, everything begins to make a bit more sense and the entire film takes a leap forward in quality as well. It just takes a little bit to get to that point. This Star Trek reboot is far from perfect, but it's certainly nowhere near the 'dismal' quality some 'Trekkies' deem it. +The Kirk and Spock relationship is the krux of the story +Uhura's role amped up +J.J. reinvigorated the series -Some conveniences -Never hits the emotional heights of the first segment 8.0/10

This was a very very very smart way to reboot the franchise, especially with concern to using the characters from the original series. Very effective job by the actors. Zachary Quinto steals the show as "the new timeline Spock." It's amazing, the script that this team of writers can put together when directed by a quality director (they also wrote the first Transformers).

Movie & TV guides

Play Daily Tomato Movie Trivia

Discover What to Watch

Rotten Tomatoes Podcasts

We earn a commission for products purchased through some links in this article.

Star Trek prequel movie from JJ Abrams in the works

Doctor Who 's Toby Haynes will direct.

preview for Star Trek: Picard Cast vs IRL

The filmmaker's company Bad Robot is producing an origin story set decades before Abrams' 2009 Star Trek film, which rebooted the franchise for the big screen in an alternate continuity.

According to Deadline , Andor and Doctor Who veteran Toby Haynes will be directing this prequel from a script by The Lego Batman Movie 's Seth Grahame-Smith.

Haynes started his career as an in-demand director in British TV, with his impressive CV also including episodes of the Star Wars series Andor as well as Sherlock and Utopia .

star trek 2009 spock prime zachary quinto and leonard nimoy

Related: Star Trek confirms new Starfleet spinoff show from Discovery boss

Plot details are being kept under wraps at this stage, and there is no official release date, but the publication reports that Abrams is also still working on Star Trek 4 .

Last autumn, screenwriter Lindsey Anderson Beer confirmed that the sequel with Chris Pine and the crew of the previous three Star Trek films remains on track .

"It's still on the tracks. I love that project, and it was another one that I had to hop off of to direct [ Pet Sematary: Bloodlines ], and that was a hard thing to do. But I love everybody involved with that project," Beer told Collider .

The project had previously been delayed following the departure of director Matt Shakman , who has since joined the Marvel Cinematic Universe for the long-awaited Fantastic Four film.

chris pine, star trek, captain kirk

Related: Star Trek spin-off saved from cancellation

The Pine-era crew of the USS Enterprise were last on the big screen in 2016 with Star Trek Beyond , which introduced Idris Elba as the main villain and featured a final appearance from the late Anton Yelchin as Chekov following his tragic death .

Star Trek: Discovery seasons 1-4 are streaming on Paramount+ . A fifth and final season has been confirmed and is expected to premiere in early 2024.

March 2024 gift ideas and deals

Disney+ for £1.99 limited time offer

Disney+ for £1.99 limited time offer

Apple TV+ 7-day free trial

Apple TV+ 7-day free trial

Michelle Keegan's Fool Me Once outfits

Michelle Keegan's Fool Me Once outfits

PS5 Slim Disc Console

PS5 Slim Disc Console

PlayStation Portal

PlayStation Portal

Disney100: The Exhibition tickets (London)

Disney100: The Exhibition tickets (London)

Xbox Series X

Xbox Series X

Shop Sky TV, broadband and mobile

Shop Sky TV, broadband and mobile

New Star Wars Millennium Falcon set

New Star Wars Millennium Falcon set

LEGO Star Wars AT-AT

LEGO Star Wars AT-AT

Helldivers 2 (PC digital code)

Helldivers 2 (PC digital code)

PS Plus Discount With Gift Cards

PS Plus Discount With Gift Cards

Headshot of Justin Harp

Night News Editor

Justin has been with Digital Spy since 2010, and in that time, has covered countless major news events for DS from the US. 

He has worked previously as both a reporter and sub editor for the brand, prior to taking on the position of Night News Editor in 2016. 

Over more than a decade, he has interviewed a wide-ranging group of public figures, from comedian Steve Coogan to icons from the Star Trek universe, cast members from the Marvel Cinematic Universe and reality stars from numerous Real Housewives cities and the Below Deck franchise. As a US contributor to Digital Spy, Justin has also been on the ground to cover major pop culture events like the Star Wars Celebration and the D23 Expo.

.css-15yqwdi:before{top:0;width:100%;height:0.25rem;content:'';position:absolute;background-image:linear-gradient(to right,#51B3E0,#51B3E0 2.5rem,#E5ADAE 2.5rem,#E5ADAE 5rem,#E5E54F 5rem,#E5E54F 7.5rem,black 7.5rem,black);} Star Trek

whoopi goldberg, star trek, guinan

Star Trek Discovery sets final season release date

star trek discovery season 3, sonequa martin green as michael burnham, looking thoughtful

Star Trek: Discovery star opens up on show's end

star trek discovery season 2, michelle yeoh, philippa georgiou

New Star Trek movie adds Ted Lasso and Power stars

star trek into darkness spock and kirk

Star Trek 4: Everything you need to know

janeway in star trek prodigy

Star Trek spin-off saved from cancellation

patrick stewart and tom hardy smile on the red carpet at a star trek movie premiere in 2002

Patrick Stewart surprised by Tom Hardy's success

patrick stewart as captain jean luc picard, star trek next generation

Patrick Stewart was advised not to do Star Trek

down low starring zachary quinto and lukas gage

First trailer for AHS star's R-rated gay comedy

star trek reboot

Star Trek 4 gets a promising update

star trek 2022 advent calendar

Star Trek advent calendar available to pre-order

star trek strange new worlds

Star Trek stars "giddy" over musical episode

TrekMovie.com

  • March 9, 2024 | Robert Picardo Says The Doctor Isn’t Just Comic Relief In ‘Star Trek: Prodigy’ Season 2
  • March 9, 2024 | ‘Picard’ Season 2 Was Rewritten After Paramount Deemed It “Too Star Trek,” Says EP
  • March 9, 2024 | The Star Trek: The Cruise VII—A Voyage Like None Other
  • March 8, 2024 | ‘Star Trek: Picard’ And ‘Strange New Worlds’ Nominated For 8 Critics Choice Super Awards
  • March 8, 2024 | Watch: Rare Footage Of Leonard Nimoy Hosting 1975 Special Presentation Of Star Trek’s “The Menagerie”

J.J. Abrams Talks “Compelling” Story For ‘Star Trek 4’; Chris Pine Expresses Frustration Over Wait

star trek movies by jj abrams

| March 1, 2023 | By: TrekMovie.com Staff 130 comments so far

The saga of J.J. Abrams’ attempt to follow up Star Trek Beyond with another feature film at Paramount Pictures continues with the first comments from the producer himself since his high-profile announcement a year ago the project was moving forward.

Abrams still looking for a director

The update on the Star Trek movie comes from an Esquire Magazine profile primarily about Chris Pine, star of Paramount’s upcoming movie Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves . In between comments from Pine, interview Alex Pappademas dropped this clue from the Star Trek producer:

Pine and crew’s return to the screen was announced in February 2022; when I speak to producer J. J. Abrams by phone, the search for a director is ongoing. Abrams is elliptical about the film, even by J. J. Abrams standards. “I will say it’s the first time [since the original reboot] that we have a story that feels as compelling as the first one.”

Director Matt Shakman stepped away from the Star Trek project last August, recently citing issues with getting the Kelvin crew actors’ schedules aligned along with the opportunity to work on a Fantastic Four movie for Marvel, but the director said the project was still active at Paramount.

star trek movies by jj abrams

J.J. Abrams with 2009 Star Trek movie cast

Pine is frustrated

As for Captain Kirk, Chris Pine tells Esquire he is in the dark:

“I don’t know anything,” he says. Which is apparently pretty standard: “In Star Trek land, the actors are usually the last people to find out anything. I know costume designers that have read scripts before the actors.” Is it weird, I ask, to be the captain and know so little about what you’re signing on to? “I would say it’s frustrating,” Pine says. “It doesn’t really foster the greatest sense of partnership, but it’s how it’s always been. I love the character. I love the people. I love the franchise. But to try to change the system in which things are created—I just can’t do it. I don’t have the energy.”

One of the reasons it has been so hard for Paramount to follow up Beyond is due to the 2016 film not meeting studio expectations; it brought in $344 million, significantly less than the $467 million delivered by Star Trek Into Darkness in 2013. Pine addressed his concerns over the studio’s goal of trying to match mega-hits from other franchises:

“I’m not sure Star Trek was ever built to do that kind of business,” Pine says. “I always thought, Why aren’t we just appealing to this really rabid fan group and making the movie for a good price and going on our merry way, instead of trying to compete with the Marvels of the world?” He’d like to span more years as Kirk but wouldn’t be surprised if Beyond was the end of it. “After the last one came out and didn’t do the $1 billion that everybody wanted it to do, and then Anton”—Yelchin, who played Chekov—“passed away, I don’t know, it just seemed . . .” He pauses, looks out the window at the view Star Trek bought.

star trek movies by jj abrams

Chris Pine as Kirk with Anton Yelchin as Chekov and John Cho as Sulu in Star Trek Beyond

Matt Shakman, who helmed the Star Trek 4 project for over a year, recently said Paramount’s goal was to make another “large tentpole film,” noting it is expensive to make a sci-fi film, especially with the returning cast that includes stars like Chris Pine and Zoe Saldana.

For now, fans will continue to wait as we will soon pass the seven-year mark since Trek’s last time on the big screen, with no solid idea when it will be back.

Keep up with all the  news on  Star Trek 4  and upcoming Trek films at TrekMovie.com .

Related Articles

star trek movies by jj abrams

Interview , Star Trek 4

Exclusive: Danai Gurira Talks About Her “Cool” Role In The Shelved Chris Hemsworth ‘Star Trek 4’ Movie

star trek movies by jj abrams

Interview , Star Trek 4 , Upcoming movies

Exclusive: Nicolas Cage Explains Why He Wants To Be In Star Trek, Confirms “Comments” From Paramount

star trek movies by jj abrams

Star Trek 4

Zoe Saldana Says Paramount Still Wants To Bring Back Kelvin Cast For “One Last” Star Trek Movie

star trek movies by jj abrams

Star Trek 4 , Upcoming movies

Paramount Developing Second Star Trek Movie In Parallel With ‘Star Trek 4’

‘a story that feels as compelling as the first one’

Maybe he means its involving time travel/alt reality, and legacy characters?

Bring back a baddie like Chris Plummer’s Kang, have a weapon that does “Rockem-Sockem Starships”, and have Kirk’s half-human/half-cat son up as a young terrorist with a heart of gold!

I just don’t understand why you’re not working in Hollywood as a writer or showrunner. You got skills.

You just answered your own question with that second sentence.

“Bring back a baddie like Chris Plummer’s Kang”

Kang was Michael Ansara.

Time travel, Alternate Universe, Trans Warp.. They slowly become a nice sweet poison. You know it kills you, but you can not Stop to like it

What i mean:

Time travel: With Section 31 and other Time travels so far in Star Trek (also the Movies), at some Space and Time you want to ask yourself what was first? The Chicken or the Egg?

Alternate Universe: Surprisingly it’s always the Terran Empire. What if the Vulcans did not separated and are the bad guys? Because it is Logical to eliminate the “cancer” of all Unworthy Lifeforms?

trans Warp: Wrath of Khan in the Kelvin Timeline Enterprise say it all. Why this Tool is to Omnipotent. Nearly the Same as the Spore Drive of Discovery

I find that worrying. He thought what Tarantino wanted to do was a good idea. He liked the Daddy Kirk transporter story. JJ is also the person who thought turning Luke Skywalker into a worthless maguffin was compelling.

I thought JJ had nothing to do with LAST JEDI, that he just trashed the odd-numbered ones? Not making excuses for him, I hate nearly all of the guy’s work — TFA is somewhat rewatchable — and think he managed to disimprove on Berman era, which is really saying something pretty nasty in my book.

JJ had nothing to do with Luke’s story in The Last Jedi. I know for a fact JJ didn’t understand why Rian Johnson made the character choices that he made… for any of the characters.

I feel for Pine- such a great actor, and really an enthusiastic creative person- and Bad Robot has strung them along with a series of false starts. I’m really skeptical of J.J. Abrams’ tenure at this point. He’s failed to get a feature off the ground for a few years now. And with Kurtzman’s shows gaining so much momentum, I wonder if the film division is looking at this 4th Kelvinverse movie as a fading prospect. Eventually, the studio is going to move on, and probably not too long from now.

Shakman the Betrayer

Why? Because he took another job when this one was stuck in development hell. I think the real issue is they can’t afford to pay the actors and keep the budget on par with the previous film.

The jokes on him — Fantastic Four…lol

They can keep the budget in line with previous films, but Beyond’s $185m is why it wasn’t profitable, it needs to be lower. But the actors are part of the reason they can’t keep the budget reasonable.

No, Paramount’s loss of two marketing executives during the period leading up to BEYOND is why the film failed. Internally this is the explanation that Paramount reached almost immmediately.

That makes sense!

Even Trekkies weren’t very excited about Beyond though. It felt like Insurrection did, a big budget episode. And I liked it. It’s the only JJ verse movie I like actually but it just had no real hook.

And another supervillain trying to take down the Federation is probably another reason no one really cared They can’t seem to come up with something new and fresh.

It’s def true that the letdown from STID probably played a role in Beyond’s disappointment. But do you really think that doing something fresh and new, a decade later, is going to lead to a $750m box office? No matter how good it looks, I think any new Trek film will struggle to reach that kind of blockbuster status.

The problem is like Pine says: they need to set their sights lower, and produce something on a more modest budget and just have fun with it. But I doubt he’d take a pay cut to do it.

We agree fully brother! 👍

I’m still shocked they are still trying (and trying and trying and trying) to even make another JJ verse movie at all. I think it’s going to make what Beyond did or even worse.

But they can still make a good movie at least. I don’t care about about JJ verse at all, especially now that Star Trek is back where it really belongs, on TV. But if it’s good I’ll definitely go see it.

But I agree I don’t think anyone really cares that much anymore. Hardcore fans will go see it of course but everyone else will just probably catch it on Paramount+ in a month, especially if it’s the same ole same ole like the last three.

As for Pine, this guy keeps saying they should make smaller movies but wasn’t he the same guy who walked when they tried to make his paycheck smaller too? 🤣

Yeah if you want to make smaller movies then you have to start where the budget inflates the most, usually starting with actor salaries. That’s also easier to control.

But Pine is just talk. Trust me, if they ever decide to call the guy again, his asking price will be the same as before and why there won’t be another movie.

Transformers films have flopped or did not make the money Paramount wanted before, they didn’t stop making Transformers movies. Same with MI 3 was a near bomb, they continue to make those. Its just Star Trek the studio doesn’t believe in. They are far more likely to greenlight more Bayturtles films than to make a Star Trek film.

Bro not a single aTF has flopped or lost money, no idea where you’re getting this? What movies are you talking about??

Bumblebee has made the least amount of money, but it was also the cheapest movie too at $130 million. And keep this in mind, it still made $150 million more than Beyond did with a much lower budget;😂

It basically made what STID made and much cheaper than that as well. How these JJ verse movies keeps getting made for the ridiculous money but no real profit to show, I will never understand it?

Ok I went and looked. Transformers: The Last Knight can be argued it bombed because it cost $250 million but it still made $600 million. So I don’t think that’s a bomb but it didn’t reach expectations either like Tiger2 explained in another thread. They probably assumed it would do a billion like the one before it and it didn’t.

But we know it wasn’t a real bomb because unlike Star Trek they made too more movies since, Bumblebee and the new one this summer. And they didn’t cancel 5 movies before they finally made Bumblebee like how bad the Trek movies have turned into a joke.

And I’m glad they finally moved on from Bay.

MI3 didn’t bomb though, it just didn’t reach expectations. And it made more than 2 out of the 3 Kelvin movies and much cheaper than 2 out of the 3 movies as well.

That’s why we got four more of those movies and Trek remains DOA

Those two marketing executives, what were their names and how exactly did their exit lead to the failure? Were they fired? Did they quit? Genuinely asking, i’ve not heard of this before.

But if Paramount is well aware that these two execs are the key to a successful Trek film, have they rehired them?

Wouldn’t that affect Paramount’s non-Star Trek products in a comparable way, though?

If they can cut $80 million like they should have from Beyond then they will probably get a greenlight.

They know the next movie could bomb again.

And the real irony is like that old saying, necessity being the mother of invention. I’d bet that if they slashed the budget, and writers were forced to be creative, they’d wind up with a better movie.

Isn’t that literally what happened with TWOK? 😉

After putting everyone to sleep with the mind blowing budget of TMP (I’ve seen it once 20 years ago, promise myself never to watch it again) they came back and did it better with TWOK with a third of the budget.

It doesn’t have to be that low but half makes sense or around $100 million. No one is going to give these fools over $150 million anyway. Not anymore! 😉

But TWOK would have cost way much more if it would have been the first movie, that means if it had been made instead of TMP.

LOL at people who feel fandom requires them to defend every thing and every one involved in Star Trek.

So annoying I agree. Almost as bad as the ones who are required to trash every thing and every one involved with current Star Trek.

Is that me? I didn’t realize finding it absurd to call a director for hire a “betrayer” because he walked from a project defending everything and everyone involved in Star Trek.

Huh. They had no cast signed on, no approved finished shooting script and no greenlight. Just a bunch of pr to try and get investors. Worse than JJ’s mystery box smoke and mirrors.

As compelling as the first one? I’d really hope he means considerably more compelling. Yea, that film sufficed because it had novelty value, but they need to do much better this time. And for my money the best one was Beyond anyway.

Beyond was the best, indeed!

Beyond was the ONLY compelling one. It was great. The 2009 film was fun, but generic, and Into Darkness was a pale ripoff of Wrath of Khan.

Agreed on Beyond; I have found things to appreciate about all of them, but Beyond is the only one I was truly enthusiastic for.

Oh, don’t get me wrong–I like all three. But the 2009 film was rather simplistic and Star Wars-y, and Into Darkness was derivative. Beyond was the first original story in that trilogy, and the only one I’d call “compelling.”

Into Darkness was paranoid conspiracy theory junk.

I agree — BEYOND was the only one of the Kelvinverse movies that I ultimately liked, in retrospect.

2009 was Star Wars remade as Star Trek, basically he remade A New Hope. Then he did it again with Force Awakens.

I’ll go so far as to say it is the only emotionally engaging one, that it at least felt right in several key moments. I saw it twice in the theater, which makes it the only Abrams-related project so viewed by me. It still has a big sag in midfilm and a protracted act 3 with all the peter pan chasing tinkerbell above yorktown stuff that had me drumming my fingers on the chair arm. Still, tons better than ID and no comparison with the utter waste of film that is the 09, which I think I’m going to start calling the Mythology-Deformer, since it tries and fails woefully to Joseph Campbell a property that already had its own unique mythology.

Loved Trek 2009. It’s by far the best of the three Kelvin movies.

I know it’s going to be a bad day when I find myself agreeing with you…

It had a lot of problems. But all three did.

Yep Beyond was the best, mostly because it felt like Star Trek and waaay less dumb than the first two.

STID was bad and dumb but the first one was actually way more dumb in so many ways but less bad of a movie, so I guess they are even. 😀🙄

Just make Tribbles the villain! Can you imagine that trailer? Easy $1bn box office gross.

In all seriousness, Trek 2009 was a good origin story. But a HUGE mistake was made with ST:ID and the Kelvin film series has never recovered from it. I can see why they went with Khan as the villain for the 2nd movie, but the John Harrison thing was a massive blunder. Kelvin-Khan needed to show less head squishing, and more of that superior intellect, to be an intimidating villain.

Failing to use the Borg as a villain in the 3rd one is puzzling. Surely space-cyborgs done right would pull in a decent non-trek audience. You could literally have had a modified (better) version of Beyond.

Idris Elba as the Borg King (Edison first to be assimilated, then assimilated the Franklin crew).

The drone ships being actual Borg drones invading the E and assimilating crew, even as the E is being ripped apart.

The clear threat to Yorktown/Federation.

Spock wondering if he is more like the Borg than human in light of his break up with Uhura/thoughts on continuing friendship with Kirk.

Kirk’s fear of losing his individuality if he stays in his role as a Captain, or accepts Admiral’s position. Questioning his Starfleet future.

Jaylah seeing her family being assimilated/fear of Borg. Having to fight her borgified father/brother instead of random henchman.

Artefact from the beginning of the movie was a hidden Omega particle. Borg King wants it to perfect the collective and power his planned assimilation of the Federation. Ent-Crew activate it in climax destroying the borg and (an assimilated) Yorktown.

Ent Crew escape Yorktown/Omega detonation in barely completed Yorktown starship (designated ENT-A at end of movie).

I remember some rumours about the Borg being in Beyond even with the trailers out (twist would end up being Krall and his army are the borg). If they want some marvel box office (AntMan box office at least) they could do worse than bring in the borg .and even have them from the Prime timeline (to create a trendy multiverse link).

Apparently, Jonathan Frakes is interested… I doubt Bad Robot has/will ask him to though.

I don’t know that Frakes would be the guy to direct a potential $200mm film. A film that big is a massive undertaking.

These films shouldn’t cost $200 million though. Creative artists and producers can find a way to make magic out of a budget of half that. A $120 million film doing $300 million at the box office reads as a success story.

Depends how Picard Season 3 succeed, Perhaps he would be to busy for the Movie :)

“I would say it’s frustrating,” Pine says. “It doesn’t really foster the greatest sense of partnership, but it’s how it’s always been. I love the character. I love the people. I love the franchise. But to try to change the system in which things are created—I just can’t do it. I don’t have the energy.”

Yeah, Nimoy and Shatner, had much more pull in TOS movies than this.

The interviewer noting that “Abrams is elliptical about the film, even by J. J. Abrams standards .” just screams volumes about why Pine is frustrated. Anyone in Bad Robot’s orbit just talks in circles all the time. All the talent potentially involved with Trek XIV has moved on, because they are in demand, and you can’t work when all a potential project gives you is double, or elliptical talk.

They moved on because these movies don’t make real money. If the last three movies made what the Transformers movies did more would’ve stuck around.

There is a reason why Michael Bay did five TF movies and Abrams bailed after the second Kelvin movie. One made hand over fist in profits, the other one just broke even or bombed.

Like why doesn’t Abrams just direct this one then? Isn’t it weird how the guy who started these movies in the first place and has less to do these days since WB has turned down practically every TV show or movie the pitched for DC doesn’t seem to have any interest to do it?

Here’s the opportunity to step in and direct the next one once Shakman left just like he stepped in to direct Episode 9 when Colin Trevorrow left. Here is the chance for history to repeat itself. But that’s not happening, I wonder why?

Probably because either they can’t afford the guy anymore or it’s not enough potential money for a backend deal Abrams to do it like he made with Star Wars.

There could be a third reason and after making huge stinkers like STID and TROS they don’t want him near this either. But we know Hollywood doesn’t care about making quality stuff, only money. It’s why Bay made five Transformers movies in the first place. 🙄

So it’s probably just a money issue.

Star Trek Beyond was so boring, the other films were very disapointing overall but not boring as such, but Star Trek beyond just felt…boring, and it had the scale of a very expensive TV movie to me. They have soooo much potential with the Kelvin crew, each film has had moments of brilliance, true “Trek” moments, but they are just moments lost in a big budget mess of a dumbed down movie series. I dont know what to say, the last 20 years of Star Trek has been awful it really has struggled in the 21st Century, I include Nemesis and ENT in that and I am fans of both.

The real life tragedy of 9/11 disproved Star Trek ‘s thesis once and for all. That’s why everything we see now is either a pastiche of the 60s version or a gritty “update” with the label of Star Trek stretched over underlit Blade Runner ripoff schlock.

I’m not exactly sure what “thesis” 09/11 disproved once and for all, so I think that probably overstates it some. But there is no question that the classical Trek value of depicting a positive, rational future has been pretty devalued, and at this juncture is pretty out of touch with the culture. Plenty was going wrong in the world when TOS and its spinoffs were on the air — wars, assassinations, crime, environmental calamities, etc. — but there was also a sense that the world could be different, and the one thing liberals and conservatives alike took for granted was that there was at least a fair chance that their children would have it better than they did, as had been the case for every generation after the postwar boom. That, unfortunately, is no longer the case. So I’ll repeat the question I’ve been asking since the Picard season premiere: if Star Trek no longer exists to portray a more hopeful future than you can get in other genre offerings, what exactly is it for?

Spoken like an old, disillusioned liberal…and I get that, because I am one of those too!

I say that because I do see a lot of positive young people today who do have a better vision for the future. And for them, yes, we need more positive Star Trek — like what see see on SNW, Prodigy and DSC, for the most part, not like what we are getting on Picard Into Darkness and Cynical Decks, for the most part.

To turn a profit for Paramount in order to cover losses in Viacom’s larger portfolio.

I used to think that if Trek could convey optimism while on the air in 1968 — a year when it seemed the balloon went up (or is it down?) on world madness — that it would probably survive tough times again with the proper stewardship.

But the last few years (or the last 30 odd years if you want to go back to when I got seriously concerned about the environment in addition to all the other Big Things) have really provoked equal measures despair and rage in me, and a Pollyanna future barely works even as escapism. Older Trek still works for me because it is protected against my cynicism by its preexistence in a memory bubble of my youth, but honestly, the TREK that remains relevant for me is mainly the darker DS9 stuff: PAST TENSE nails things decades ahead of time, s31 shows what it needs to about governments and IN THE PALE MOONLIGHT is prid near perfect.

Sorry to pee on the wedding cake, but that’s my two cents. Now I got to go back to editing my PICARD article, which is quadruple the length it is supposed to be. (Too bad startrek.com and the newest version of the TREK magazine never respond to my inquiries, because I could keep them well-fed with just my leftovers.)

…there is no question that the classical Trek value of depicting a positive, rational future has been pretty devalued, and at this juncture is pretty out of touch with the culture. Plenty was going wrong in the world when TOS and its spinoffs were on the air — wars, assassinations, crime, environmental calamities, etc. — but there was also a sense that the world could be different…

This is a fascinating discussion. I’m not *not* convinced, but I’m not convinced, either. :)

TOS premiered in 1966 — that’s just over 20 years after V-E day, longer than the time that has passed between 9/11 and today.

If TOS could credibly portray an optimistic future a mere 20 years after the Holocaust, and indeed a mere 40 years after the Great War, I’m not sure why 9/11 precludes modern Trek from doing so as well.

I’d throw out the following hypotheses:

1. The issue is not so much 9/11 or other world events, but *domestic* politics — after Watergate, the loss of confidence in domestic institutions, and the US government to “do the right thing,” made it harder to believe in a future with a robust, stable, morally positive polity like the Federation. In the early 1960, people believed in the righteousness of Western democracy. Watergate changed that, and although that crisis of confidence receded in the 1980s and immediate post-Cold War period (uncoincidentally, the time when TNG was made), it came back with a vengeance in the new century after the Great Recession. Just *why* it came back is a huge question for political scientists.

2. Roddenberry and his cohort were not just garden-variety Hollywood producers — they served in the war, and then as a civilian commercial pilot with PanAm. Say what you will about him, but he believed in that future despite lived experience that showed how hard it would be to achieve. JJ’s lived experience is what, Hasty Pudding?

This is a fascinating (sorry) conversation to have. I think the parallel I would make is that in the mid 60’s, the nation was dealing with the existential dread of the A bomb constantly looming over them. If embracing space socialism meant not having the bomb dropped on themselves, that was something to look forward to! Now, the clear existential threats hanging over us constantly are not just the bomb, but also the wealth gap, a charred environment with the slimmest of chances of turning around, an economy that has pivoted to the exact opposite of socialism that we have healthcare from Amazon (owned by the richest person on the planet). The hopeful optimism of TOS Trek (which I still unabashedly love and show to my child) is not applicable. SNW did a radical thing (in my opinion) right off the bat in the pilot episode by showing familiar images to us 21st century rubes and pairing them with fabricated images of WWIII to show that it will get worse, much worse before it gets better. It shows us that we will pay for our follies but that we may still be resolute if we rely on each other to solve issues.

The nice thing about current Trek isn’t that all the programming is solid (spoiler, it isn’t) but that each show gives different people different views through which to help understand our humanity. Having trouble coping with trauma? There’s Discovery. Need a kids show that portrays a diverse group of kids working together? There’s Prodigy. Need a show about dealing with multiple midlife neurosis? There’s Picard. Want the old feeling of episodic cowboys in space? There’s Strange New Worlds. Need a good laugh while wallowing in the warm blanket that is 24th century LCARS and uniforms? There’s Lower Decks.

I didn’t mean to make this a defense of the franchise as a whole and sorry if I derailed the thread a bit, but I am one of the most cynical people I know and having a son that I am mostly convinced will grow up in a capitalist hellscape makes me reach for any amount of hope I can. I usually find writing and thinking about Trek gives me that so I think they’re still abiding by the original mantra set forth in the 1960’s. At least for me.

I find it very courageous that you even had a kid given that viewpoint. I knew that I couldn’t ever live with myself if I brought a kid into the world, given the way I saw the world as far back as the mid-70s when I was a teen. I spent a couple decades waiting for a vasectomy procedure to become free before finally shelling out for it myself. My wife and I always and only wanted to adopt, but never came across any situation where we’d qualify financially.

There’s a little core of gushy optimism in nearly all cynics, and Trek really used to tap that expertly with me. But that was another century …

For me Star Trek has been awful with Enterprise and only got worse JJ verse (but I thought all those were better than Nemesis at least) and more awful with Discovery and Picard.

Now I like more of that today. Really came to like Enterprise once I watched it and I did like Beyond but yeah it is on the boring side but a quality film. Picard is finally feeling like Star Trek to me this season but I said the same thing about the first two seasons after the first few episodes only to turn into huge stinkers, so not jumping the gun yet

But it’s sad I have been mostly unfulfilled since Voyager went off the air until very recently when LDS, SNW and PRO showed up. And I know some fans are still mixed on those shows too. But I am enjoying it more personally today, it just sucks it took this long.

Can’t be too compelling if no one is ponying up the money to make it, and the studio is waffling on starting it.

Even if the story was the most compelling thing ever conceived, this is a commercial business and the studio’s overriding concern is whether the pic would make money. The Kelvin films’ track record at the box office is pretty spotty. It ST films made bank, we wouldn’t be talking about when the fourth film is going to be released. We’d be eagerly anticipating the seventh .

Untrue. Film studios don’t make monetary decisions based on how compelling something is.

You’re splitting hairs on semantics there. Whatever the process is for evaluating a potential project, if compelling is one of the adjectives used to describe it, then they’ll make their decision accordingly. Outside of JJ talking it up, no one seems to be in a rush to make this movie (we’re assuming this story even exists). No one else seems too….compelled….by it.

Abrams wouldn’t know compelling if it hit him in the head.

If finding a director is the issue, why not JJ himself?

It would be erroneous to assume Abrahm’s isn’t busy.

JONATHAN FRAKES has been saying all along he’d direct a JJ ‘Trek film ….. what’s stopping Paramount (and JJ) from asking him, if they’re ONLY waiting to find a director?

Another candidate I would put forward from Star Trek is Olatunde, perhaps my favorite Trek director right now.

The problem with Olatunde is that he doesn’t know what a tripod is. Hand held camera works for action scenes, but when two people are talking and having a quiet moment he still has the camera bouncing around. It’s jarring and constantly pulls me out of the story.

Jesus Christ, no. All that guy knows how to do is spin a camera.

What’s stopping Paramount? Maybe no script. No story. No investors. Clearly, no budget. And Frakes waffles just a bit on directing, as well. Seems he does have other projects going on.

Yeah…all of this! 🤣

Simple answer. He doesn’t want to.

Because JJ will want a huge paycheck which will prevent it from being made on a reasonable budget. Trek was never a passion project for him, it was a job.

It was supposed to be a cash cow, with him wanting TPTB to suppress all other merchandise so that Kelvingear would have a wide-open road. When that didn’t happen, he probably washed at least one of his hands of it for good. And I’m more than fine with it going down that way.

I thought the 2009 film was great, which has re-watch value for me to this day. As does Beyond, which was very good except for pretty much wasting the talents of Idris Elba. As for STID, if it were a newspaper, I wouldn’t even deem to line my birdcage with it.

Overall, I find Abrams/Bad Robot to be very overrated. And please, stop using Beastie Boys songs in Trek movies.

Sooner or later Paramount will make this with the Kelvin crew! Its all about budget how little or how much they want to spend but in 2009 they went big & got approx $1.5b out of the franchise with 3 films. They just need to go big again relaunch the Kelvin crew with another mega budget JJ production with lens flare searing out of every frame & even JJ himself directing perhaps!

As crazy as that sounds, I think you’re right

Otherwise no point making another Trek movie the setup costs for new ship & crew are too high! Give the Kelvin one last adventure I think will do big box office & get a few more movies with this cast!

Makes no sense. A. They already have to make a new ship since they destroyed the last one lol. B. You think it will cost more to hire a new actor than it would to keep Zoe Saldana around who has already been in three of these and can command even more money now since her last three movies were Infinity War, Endgame and Avatar 2? Bro all those movies made more money in a single weekend than Beyond made total. 🤣🤣

What are you talking about??! New actors would be way less money unless they are Tom Cruise or Matt Damon replacing them lol.

They probably should fire the cast and just hire Cruise to do it and the next movie might actually make money.

I don’t get the lens flare or Apple bridge; SNW did that all much better with a smaller budget. I’d use the SNW bridge sets, ships just go with that’s the Kelvin “movie era” or restore the timeline or something along those lines. Go full motion picture era with Carol Marcus, Saavik, etc but something totally different like trying to stop a civilization from triggering a Higgs collapse at a supermassive black hole and go totally new with the 1701 ending up on some cross-galaxy expedition to stop it before everything (including the prime timeline) is doomed. Try to combine TMP with TWOK in some LOTR type adventure, something that should be possible but has never truly been done.

That’s not bad, something a little along the lines of what John Black pitched as a feature back in the 70s.

I always want to say that a small but successful Trek feature would be the way to go, but small, even if profitable, doesn’t often leave a mark that spurs more interest (look at Karl Urban’s DREDD — no followup and it has been over a decade I think.)

Is there just a whiff of sarcasm here?

Bro the last one bombed! No one cared about it but Trekkies and that was 3 years after STID. Now I don’t even think even a lot of Trekkies care about these movies anymore which means the next movie can bomb harder than Beyond did it the budget is too high again.

Why else has there been no movie after 7 years? It’s just money. Either they still don’t have enough to make a movie or they don’t think it will make enough. That’s all it is. If Beyond made a billion dollars, the next one would’ve been made years ago with an even bigger budget.

But instead it flopped, people aren’t dying to give the next movie more money because they will probably flop too. On top of that the cast can now ask for whatever they want not being under contract anymore and why no one has called Chris Pine. 🤣

I get why he’s complaining, but he’s also part of the problem. If they could make another big movie like Beyond they would just make the movie by now. It’s been 7 years! 😜

Pine should direct ST4. Obviously! They just need to ask him.

I just read the VF story. I don’t think that’s something Pine is interested in doing.

I like Chris Pine because, unlike pretty much everyone else involved with Trek, he’s not a hype machine. He’s an honest and thoughtful person.

One big problem is that the cast is now VERY expensive and that defeats the purpose of trying to make a film on a modest budget.

Well, perhaps the State of the Art now with Greenscreen and Monitor walling could reduce some Budget. But Today you need more CGI as in the Past and i bet many Star Trek “Pipeline CGI Artists” have their hand full with TV Series and such

But well, perhaps they can hunt for Ex-Game High Qualify Animators. They are trowing some of them out, because of saving Money. Same Ships but different Decks. could work

Go back to the TOS movie sequel model. Limit the number of space and transporter and ship shots to 150 cuts, not 1500.

And I find it terribly ironic that Pine is pushing for a lower budget. “Ok, Chris, we found a way to make it for $90m. You just have to do it for a $1m salary.” Crickets…

Quinto, Cho and Urban are doing TV shows. How pricey could they be? These guys aren’t Tom Holland or The Rock.

Semi-warm take: Pine is right. Trek films are never gonna make Marvel levels of money. Paramount would do well to disabuse themselves that they are.

Anyone in their right mind agrees!

I feel like Paramount is stalling and waiting for the clock to run out on JJ’s Kelvin Trek. It seems like it is going to be very close to a decade since Beyond before anything new is back in theaters.

With the Prime timeline of Star Trek flourishing on P+, how long will any interest in the unrelated and dormant Kelvin Trek last?

There are many questioning (including Paramount perhaps?) that the streaming series are flourishing, as you contend.

Who are the “many questioning” other than trolls here in the chat room? The streaming series objectively are flourishing as they are at the forefront of everything that Paramount+ publicizes.

Lots of people like those youtubers who have been yelling at the sky that Kurtzman is going to be fired ANY DAY NOW because new Star Trek is a failure, viewership is in the toilet, and Nick Meyer has ALREADY signed on to replace him! Haven’t you heard????

One can hope Trellium G.

2009 is the only Kelvin movie I could get my family to watch, and it convinced them to stick with the prime timeline. I can’t see myself going to a theatre to watch one alone.

I notice in hindsight that Paramount stuck JJ with making the announcement of the fourth movie launch window to investors…a deadline he’s failing to meet.

The fact that Abrams himself now seems to feel compelled to keep the hype alive suggests he’s not in a position of strength.

And why would he be?

His tentpole projects are not doing well.

Star Trek 4 should be about Kirk traveling back in time to save his father (aka Chris Hemsworth). In the process he sacrifices the Enterprise and dies dramatically but manages to restore the timeline. This erases the Kelvin alternate universe and puts everything back in place. It wound be a nice closure and ends the way the whole movie series started.

Of course the Alternative Universe is separate from the main universe so nothing needs fixing.

I’d direct it and I’d do it for 100.000 to 200,000. But I’m not really all that experienced with big budget films. Still to work on a Trek film is a dream of mine. I’ll do whatever the current prenise they got is though and not fight then. I will push it to be better of course. If anyone there at Paramount wants to contact me we can talk about it. Not that I expect them to from a post on this forum.

To summarise: I don’t feel like I need anymore of this crew. It’s too late. That era is closed for me. The series franchise is way ahead and currently way more interesting. I’m talking about SNW and any new post-TNG era series.

I feel bad for Pine, Quinto, Saldana, Urban, etc. These actors are constantly asked about a follow-up film. I don’t personally care about the Kelvin timeline … I would rather Paramount pour any money for the Trek film franchise into Kurtzman’s coffers.

A surefire way to generate the most comments in the least amount of time is to post an article on ST 4.

Maybe JJ Abrams should direct it. I mean he probably has enough pull left with the studio to actually get the movie made. Though i still believe the 4th movie as real as George Lucas sequel Star Wars trilogy. As in its not getting made.

After “Rise of Skywalker,” I’d prefer Abrams never direct anything else ever again.

I could be devil’s advocate and say he had to course correct after Last Jedi, but i won’t because JJ never had a plan. If only he had bothered to outline, and figured out who Rey was and had an actual arc for Luke. All he did was remake A New Hope. There were some interesting ideas i liked Rey as a scavenger and the idea of Finn as a renegade former stromtrooper turned Jedi. But it never went anywhere. The least interesting to me was Kylo as the new Vader. Why did Luke search for the first Jedi temple, why was there a map. A bunch of mystery boxes. And Last Jedi didn’t answer them. Also JJ making Rey a Palpatine i also found incredibly disappointing.

JJ was handed an impossible task with that film, and I guarantee he didn’t even want to do it. But they wanted his name attached, and probably thought that if anyone could clean up that mess it could be him, and backed up a brinks truck to convince him.

The real question is why they didn’t just contract him for all three in the first place, so there could be at the very least one clean story, win or lose.

Pine is frankly right. And I’m not even a fan. Trek was never going to pull in Marvel money and they should spend less on the movie and expect modest returns. As many of the TOS era movies showed us, You can make classic timeless movies on a limited budget if you Just Stick To the STORY!

“I always thought, Why aren’t we just appealing to this really rabid fan group and making the movie for a good price and going on our merry way, instead of trying to compete with the Marvels of the world?” At least Sad Robot did a decent job casting Kirk because that Pine guy is also smarter than the admirals.

Just feed ChatGTP with all those attempted scripts and ideas for ST4 (and the rejected for ST3) and we might get a story…

Chris Pine nailed it on the head. It goes to show you that the actual artists and creators understand the real potential and niche this franchise holds. It’s the number crunchers at the top trying to squeeze every damn penny out of us that create issues. Good on Pine for allowing his frustration to boil over. A combination of passion for the material and being self aware enough to know he’s ready to move on if it’s just going to cause frustration.

I’m of the opinion that the movie franchise needs a new “showrunner”, because it really demands someone’s undivided attention, and I mean no slight to JJ Abrams when I say his undivided attention is a rare commodity.

Is anyone even looking for a fourth movie at this point?

If pine wants the film made on a tighter budget he could have helped by accepting a lesser fee.

I’m hoping Star Trek 4 is base on TOS “Assignment: Earth” and TOS “Tomorrow is Yesterday” together. It would make a super Star Trek movie.

A better formula for success is to stop trying to recast old characters with new actors. Just invent new characters and tell new stories with those guys.

Star Trek: Generations Could Have Been A Captain Kirk Vs. Picard Showdown

Star Trek: Generations Kirk and Picard

David Carson's 1994 film "Star Trek: Generations" has a farfetched premise, even by Trek's own outlandish standards. It seems there is a mysterious energy ribbon called the Nexus that periodically floats through the galaxy. The Nexus destroys any starships it encounters but also sweeps living beings into its own mysterious pocket dimension. The Nexus' pocket dimension is essentially Heaven, where its victims live out their happiest memories. Time also stands still in the Nexus, allowing its inhabitants to remain there eternally. 

The physical existence of Heaven, one might think, would be a heady concept for a humanist franchise like "Star Trek." How would the universe react if Heaven was in a physical location one could visit? One might think there would be a mad dash to get there as soon as possible, rapidly depleting the galaxy's population. 

Sadly, "Generations" sidesteps any interesting ideas in favor of a useless "pass the torch" story wherein Captain Picard (Patrick Stewart) and Captain Kirk (William Shatner) could meet face-to-face. Because time has no meaning in the Nexus, both Picard and Kirk can enter at different times, but meet as if no time has passed at all. They exit the Nexus together merely to thwack Malcolm McDowell in the face. 

According to the oral history book "The Fifty-Year Mission: The Next 25 Years: From The Next Generation to J. J. Abrams," edited by Mark A. Altman and Edward Gross, there was an earlier draft of "Generations" that wasn't about a temporal Nexus, but a rip in space that an interdimensional villain slips through. That treatment, by the unbeloved producer Maurice Hurley, was going to feature a scene in which Picard recreated Kirk on the holodeck ... and fought him. 

Mayhem and chaos and blood

Hurley, Trekkies might know, was a producer during the first two tempestuous seasons of "Star Trek: The Next Generation." He was the one who had a notorious beef with actress Gates McFadden and who had her fired for the second season. When Hurley left, McFadden was re-hired. 

Longtime "Star Trek" writer/producer Brannon Braga recalls the early plans to make a "Star Trek: The Next Generation" movie, and revealed a time-old producer's tactic: commission two different scripts from two different writing teams, then select the better script. It allows a producer to hedge their bets, just in case one of the scripts is a stinker. Hurley was assigned one script, and Braga and Ron D. Moore were hired to write the other. Braga was confident that Hurley's treatment was the "junk" idea that was only being built to be thrown away. Braga and Moore, not incidentally, are the credited screenwriters on the film. 

Hurley recalled his idea clearly, though. He liked the idea of interdimensional travelers who, when trying to return to their home dimension, did a lot of damage to the galaxy. Hurley had a not-very-good simile:

"You can compare it to a parent in a schoolyard with his two-year-old child, with the parent on one end and the child on the other. The child is in a dangerous situation, about to die. You rush across the schoolyard, stepping on toes, knocking down children, breaking bones, and smashing heads to get to your baby. Then you save your baby and you look back at all the mayhem and chaos and blood that you have caused among all these other two-year-old children."

Maybe "killing a bunch of two-year-olds" wasn't a great concept to attach a "Star Trek" script to.

Call in the Kirk

Hurley continued: 

"You could have killed one of them, but it wouldn't have made a difference to you until after the fact when you looked back and said, 'Oh my God, what did I do? I'm sorry, but I just didn't have a choice.' That's the story. These other people who are here and are about to destroy us are basically saying, 'Sorry, but there's nothing we can do about it. You're all going to have to die.'"

This notion was kind of folded into the Braga/Moore script. In the finished movie, Dr. Soren (McDowell) has been using special missiles to extinguish stars, hence changing the gravity throughout the galaxy, and redirecting the Nexus so that he could get back inside. The problem was that extinguishing stars destroyed their entire solar system, and Soren was prepared to wipe out a whole inhabited world for his own selfish ends. 

The "Kirk vs. Picard" notion enters Hurley's story when Picard discovers that the interdimensional beings he's facing are simplistic and violent and have no ability to be reasoned with. Desperate for a solution, Picard would rush to the Enterprise's holodeck and consult a virtual version of Captain Kirk, known to be a masterful tactician. Picard, Hurley seemed to feel, wasn't "tough" enough to face off against his invented interdimensional beings, and required the cowboy violence of Kirk. 

It wasn't so much a "who would win in a fight?" query as a "who's a better captain?" query. Who is better suited in a battle situation with desperate, unreasonable people? 

Classic Trek enemies

Hurley elucidated: 

"My story was a chance to put these two classic characters — Picard and Kirk — and two really good actors together and let them bang on each other. Picard realizes there's no subtext to the attack. In a battle with a Klingon or a Romulan, there's a subtext. Romulans want to kick your ass and, in the process, they want you to know how damn smart and superior they are. These people have no subtext and Picard begins to investigate." 

Naturally, Kirk had some key knowledge.

"[T]he only other time on record that this has ever happened, and the only person who witnessed it, was Kirk. Picard attempts to get a point of view from the Kirk character that is different from what he's getting from pure facts. But that's not enough, so he starts manipulating the image, which produces a couple of bizarre scenes between Picard and Kirk — and they get pretty confrontational at certain moments. You want to bring back Kirk and not have it get confrontational? Kirk will get confrontational with anyone. In 'Star Trek V,' Kirk got confrontational with God." 

Braga noted that Hurley didn't even finish this script, so it seems like it was doomed from the start. Needless to say, Hurley's idea was abandoned, and Paramount went with the other story. The Kirk/Picard meeting was kept, as was the above-mentioned villain's motivation.

It should be reiterated that Kirk wasn't necessary to write a good "Next Generation" movie, but the studio seemed fixated. The final film isn't great , but it seems they did the best they could under the circumstances.  

Screen Rant

10 biggest changes j.j. abrams made to star trek.

J.J. Abrams' Kelvin Timeline Star Trek movies made changes that were incorporated into new TV shows Discovery, Strange New Worlds, and Picard.

  • J.J. Abrams' Star Trek films influence the newer shows and are particularly influential in Star Trek: Strange New Worlds.
  • The visual language established by Abrams, including lens flare and artistic choices, is adopted by both Star Trek: Discovery and Star Trek: Picard.
  • Abrams' movies introduce new elements to the Star Trek canon, such as Uhura's first name being confirmed as "Nyota" and enhancements to transporter technology.

J.J. Abrams' Star Trek films reimagine the era of Star Trek: The Original Series with elements that have been adopted by the franchise's newest shows. Star Trek: Strange New Worlds borrows the most inspiration from Abrams' updated visions, as a show set aboard the USS Enterprise NCC-1701. Star Trek: Discovery has nods to alien designs and concepts that originated in the Kelvin Timeline movies. Even Star Trek: Picard, though it takes place a century later, acknowledges certain story elements from Abrams' movies, going so far as to make them integral to the plot of Picard season 1.

The production design of Abrams' Kelvin Timeline Star Trek movies is inspired by Star Trek: The Original Series , expanded and buffeted by a 21st-century feature-film budget, to interpret what could have been if creator Gene Roddenberry had access to modern technology when producing TOS in the 1960s. The TOS movies featured updated designs that persisted into the era of Star Trek: The Next Generation and beyond, so it's not unreasonable to imagine visions of the future that evolve even further. Star Trek shows in the modern era run with these visions, as if in agreement that Abrams is on the right track in conceptualizing the Kelvin Timeline .

Related: Star Trek Beyond Ending & Why No Sequel 7 Years Later Explained

10 Artistic Lens Flare

Discovery and picard use abrams' visual language to direct viewer attention.

Star Trek (2009) and Star Trek Into Darkness certainly didn't invent the lens flare, but they make liberal use of it as an artistic choice, which is also adopted by Star Trek: Discovery and Star Trek: Picard as part of the visual language of Star Trek in general. In the era of Star Trek: The Motion Picture , lens flare was a simple fact of cinematography, owing to the way that cameras actually capture light. Improvements in lens technology and filming techniques mean the use of lens flares in modern Star Trek films and television shows are deliberate choices designed to guide the viewer's attention with futuristic flourishes.

9 Uhura's First Name

"nyota" wasn't canon until star trek (2009).

Throughout Star Trek: The Original Series and its films, Nichelle Nichols' Uhura is referred to only by her last name. "Nyota", which means "star" in Swahili, was coined by fans as a potential first name for Uhura that was used in books and by Nichols herself, but in Star Trek , canon only counts if it's on-screen. Uhura's first name being Nyota became official canon in Star Trek (2009) when Spock calls Zoe Saldaña's Uhura by her name. In Star Trek: Strange New Worlds, Celia Rose Gooding's Ensign Uhura also sports the first name Nyota, confirming this fact from the Kelvin Timeline applies in the Prime Timeline as well.

8 Microprint Uniform Details

The devil's in the deltas..

The solid-color uniforms of Star Trek: The Original Series are reimagined with what appears to be a texture, but upon closer inspection, is revealed to be a repeated Starfleet delta in a fine monochrome print . The same delta microprint appears on the side panels of the 2250s uniforms in Star Trek: Discovery , now in metallic colorways over the uniform's base of navy blue. Star Trek: Strange New Worlds adapts the concept into versions with division-specific insignia printed on the fabric used on the upper sleeves, and Star Trek: Picard season 3's uniforms feature tiny monochrome deltas on the upper shoulders.

Crafty cosplayers can recreate this look with a Cricut and iron-on vinyl.

Related: Star Trek 2009 Ending Explained

7 A Different Look for Klingons

Star trek: discovery takes cues from star trek into darkness for its klingons.

Every iteration of Klingons in Star Trek continues to evolve the design of these famous adversaries of the Federation. In Star Trek Into Darkness , Nyota Uhura (Zoe Saldaña) speaks to a group of Klingons on Q'onoS that look markedly different from the Prime universe Klingons, with their lack of hair and pierced forehead ridges. Star Trek Into Darkness' Klingons appear to be a step between Prime Klingons and Star Trek: Discovery 's notable Klingon redesign, which pushes the boundaries into a much more alien visual than those seen in the Star Trek: The Next Generation era.

6 Phasers Operate Differently

Phasers don't just shoot straight beams.

The USS Kelvin, in Star Trek 's opening scenes, shows phaser banks located on swivels on the hull, allowing for phaser fire in multiple directions at once. The Prime Timeline Enterprise in Star Trek: Discovery and Star Trek: Strange New Worlds also features multi-directional phaser arrays. Although a different color, the phasers in Discovery more closely resemble the effects in the Kelvin Timeline, operating in pulses and bursts rather than a continuous beam , but both methods of operation are possible.

5 Enhanced Transporter Capability

You can, in fact, transport moving people.

The need to stand still during transport in Star Trek: The Original Series is a necessity born of the production capabilities of the time, but modern visual effects allow for beaming targets in freefall in Star Trek (2009), Kirk and Spock off Nibiru in Star Trek Into Darkness, and Kirk from his moving motorcycle in Star Trek Beyond . Transwarp beaming in Star Trek: The Next Generation requires both locations to be at synchronous warp, but in Star Trek (2009) Montgomery Scott (Simon Pegg) can, with Prime Spock's (Leonard Nimoy) help, beam to a vessel at warp. Both enhancements to transporter technology persist into new Star Trek shows.

4 The Enterprise's Bridge Design

Strange new worlds' enterprise evokes the kelvin version.

The bridge of the starship Enterprise is a familiar set to Star Trek fans, and its appearance in Star Trek (2009) updated its look from painted plywood to sleek metal and glass, trading jellybean button consoles for holographic displays, and offering more space between its stations. When the Enterprise appeared in Star Trek: Discovery season 2 , the new Enterprise set owed a lot to the Kelvin Timeline version , including the fact that the viewscreen, now wide enough to span the front of the bridge, was an actual window looking into space.

Related: Star Trek Into Darkness Ending & Problems Explained

3 Captain Christopher Pike's Leadership in Action

Captain pike is great in star trek: discovery and star trek: strange new worlds.

The Enterprise's previous captain certainly existed prior to the Abrams films, with Jeffrey Hunter's Captain Christopher Pike starring in the first Star Trek pilot, "The Cage". Hunter's Pike provides clues to his leadership style, with a reluctance to determine the fate of his officers in battle, but until Bruce Greenwood's portrayal of Pike in Star Trek (2009), he's not a fleshed-out or well-known character. Greenwood's Pike is a substitute father figure and mentor who wants to bring out James T. Kirk's (Chris Pine) potential, and Anson Mount's version of Pike has similar relationships with his junior officers, particularly the conflicted Cadet Nyota Uhura in Strange New Worlds season 1.

2 The Romulan Supernova

Star trek: picard references the destruction of romulus in 2387.

First mentioned in the Kelvin Timeline films, the Romulan supernova of 2387 remains a hard fact in the Prime Timeline , where it's a defining event in the life of Admiral Jean-Luc Picard prior to Star Trek: Picard season 1 . The Prime Timeline's Romulan supernova is the driving force that inspires Romulan captain Nero (Eric Bana) to travel back in time in hopes of exacting revenge on Prime Spock, after he failed to prevent the disaster. Nero's journey back to the 23rd century in the first place is the inflection point that creates the Kelvin timeline.

Admiral Picard tenders his resignation when Starfleet pulls back from their mission to help Romulan refugees after the supernova.

1 The Kelvin Timeline

Star trek: discovery confirms the existence of the kelvin timeline.

After the USS Discovery makes the jump into the 32nd century, the Mirror Universe's Emperor Phillippa Georgiou (Michelle Yeoh) starts experiencing unusual symptoms. In Star Trek: Discovery season 3, episode 9 "Terra Firma, Part 1", Dr. Kovich (David Cronenberg) explains he's seen this before, in the case of Temporal War veteran Lt. Commander Yor, who traveled not just through time, but also from Yor's home universe, which Kovich explains was created during the temporal incursion of a Romulan mining ship . This directly references the creation of the Kelvin Timeline, proving people in the Prime Timeline are aware of it.

The cast of J.J. Abrams' Star Trek movies created a new cohort of fans primed to take interest in Captain Kirk, Mr. Spock, Nyota Uhura, and other classic characters. Updated visuals and storytelling meant that people who might pass over Star Trek: The Original Series for looking dated had a doorway into Star Trek that they could take more seriously . Without the Kelvin Timeline films and J.J. Abrams' changes, it's unlikely that the new era of Star Trek television shows or the new versions of legacy characters in Star Trek: Discovery and Star Trek: Strange New Worlds would exist today.

Star Trek (2009), Star Trek Into Darkness, Star Trek Beyond, Star Trek: Discovery, Star Trek: Strange New Worlds, and Star Trek: Picard are available to stream on Paramount+.

Star Trek (2009)

Star trek into darkness, star trek beyond.

Den of Geek

Why Star Trek Uniform Colors Changed From the Original Series to Next Generation

The uniforms on Star Trek have changed over time, but for reasons that make a lot more sense behind the scenes than on the Enterprise bridge.

star trek movies by jj abrams

  • Share on Facebook (opens in a new tab)
  • Share on Twitter (opens in a new tab)
  • Share on Linkedin (opens in a new tab)
  • Share on email (opens in a new tab)

Star Trek: The Next Generation Cast

Even if you don’t know an El-Aurian from an Illyrian, even if you can’t tell the original Enterprise from the Enterprise-D, you’re probably familiar with one of the fundamental rules of Star Trek : redshirts always die.

Unlike many of the popular misconceptions about the series (Kirk doesn’t actually chase women, for example), the redshirt stereotype does have grounding in the show. Over the course of three seasons in The Original Series , 26 characters wearing red tunics died, as opposed to 15 wearing gold and blue combined. But that trend stopped with the Star Trek movies, and continued to fall away with The Next Generation and the spinoffs that followed.

Why, you ask? Because the costume colors signify a crewman’s role on their particular ship, and the color scheme changed between TOS and TNG .

Although some Trekkies hate to admit it, Star Trek didn’t really have much in the way of canon in its first few episodes. Leaving aside the infamous grinning Spock in the original pilot, it took several episodes to decide on the name of Starfleet or the Prime Directive. The same was true of the uniforms, as demonstrated by the luscious green shirt that Kirk sometimes sported.

Ad – content continues below

By the end of the series, however, the three main colors solidified into the following divisions: those in command wore gold, people such as Kirk and Sulu. Science officers and doctors, namely Spock and Bones, dressed in blue, while everyone else had red shirts. And by everyone else, that includes engineers like Scotty and security personnel, which is why they tended to get killed.

But as is so often the case with all things Trek , the uniforms weren’t entirely what creator Gene Roddenberry had in mind. Most notably, the gold uniforms were actually intended to be green, but read on camera as the color that we know today. During production of the never-released follow-up show, Star Trek: Phase II , Roddenberry wanted continuity between TOS and the new series, not only in terms of the cast, which mixed Kirk and Sulu with newcomers, but also production. In particular, Roddenberry brought back his original series costume designer William Ware Theiss.

However, when production shifted and Phase II became Star Trek: The Motion Picture , Theiss was replaced by Robert Fletcher, who designed costumes for the movie crew through Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home . Fletcher maintained some of Roddenberry’s vision for TMP , which tried to match ’70s aesthetics by giving the crew pastel pajamas. But when Nicholas Meyer took over for Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan , Fletcher designed military-inspired uniforms to match the director’s naval warfare vision.

Although most Trekkies prefer the Meyer movies, Roddenberry hated the militarization of Starfleet and, equally important, resented the way his franchise was taken from him. So when Roddenberry regained some power for The Next Generation , he sought to right the ship, so to speak, by making Starfleet explorers again. And with it, he brought back Theiss.

For the most part, Theiss succeeded where Roddenberry and Fletcher failed in TMP . The TNG uniforms feel like ’80s versions of the ’60s original, especially after they were revised in season 3. However, with the emphasis on division colors came a confusing switch. Once again, science officers and doctors wore blue, but command now wore red while operations wore gold. Also, there’s the skant, but only Lower Decks talks about that now.

So why did the colors change? Once again, the answer is simple and almost mundane. Patrick Stewart apparently didn’t look commanding enough in yellow, while Brent Spiner , in his pale Data makeup, didn’t look good in red.

Roddenberry and the producers may have also been amenable to these changes because of the public’s changing perception of the aesthetic of Star Trek at the time. It was the massive success of Star Trek IV that gave Roddenberry the green light for TNG , and in that movie the crew wore the same civilian clothes that they sported in The Search for Spock , but during the first three Trek movies, Kirk wore red (as did Spock and the rest of the crew, because everyone wore red in Meyers’ more militarized uniforms).

Get the best of Den of Geek delivered right to your inbox!

So in the eyes of casual fans, the Captain wore red. And even Trekkies had seen enough of Kirk in red that the idea didn’t seem outlandish.

The Trek uniforms have been altered many times since. TNG and Deep Space Nine later limited colors to the shoulders, a look continued in Voyager . The TNG movies then introduced darker uniforms in Star Trek: First Contact , with division colors on the underliner, a look adopted by later seasons of Deep Space Nine .

These stories adhere to the division colors from TNG , but whenever the franchise goes back to pre- TNG era — including the J.J. Abrams reboot movies or Strange New Worlds — the TOS colors come back into play. Even the prequel series Enterprise , in which the crew of the NX-01 wears blue jumpsuits with TOS division colors on the piping. And then there’s Discovery , which began with blue uniforms and a different division color scheme, but that show started out as its own thing, anyway.

Rest assured, writers both official and on the internet have offered in-Universe explanations for the evolution of the costumes. But the best explanation is that Star Trek , as an ongoing story over six decades old, had evolved and mutated over the years, sometimes in ways that don’t make sense. And as long as some unnamed operations ensign gets killed now and again, that’s just fine.

Joe George

Joe George | @jageorgeii

Joe George’s writing has appeared at Slate, Polygon, Tor.com, and elsewhere!

  • Copy from this list
  • Report this list

J.J. Abrams Movies

  • Movies or TV
  • IMDb Rating
  • In Theaters
  • Release Year

1. Mission: Impossible III (2006)

PG-13 | 126 min | Action, Adventure, Thriller

IMF agent Ethan Hunt comes into conflict with a dangerous and sadistic arms dealer who threatens his life and his fiancée in response.

Director: J.J. Abrams | Stars: Tom Cruise , Michelle Monaghan , Ving Rhames , Philip Seymour Hoffman

Votes: 388,866 | Gross: $134.03M

Fast-paced, with eye-popping stunts and special effects, the latest Mission: Impossible installment delivers everything an action fan could ask for. A thrilling summer popcorn flick.

2. Star Trek (2009)

PG-13 | 127 min | Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi

The brash James T. Kirk tries to live up to his father's legacy with Mr. Spock keeping him in check as a vengeful Romulan from the future creates black holes to destroy the Federation one planet at a time.

Director: J.J. Abrams | Stars: Chris Pine , Zachary Quinto , Simon Pegg , Leonard Nimoy

Votes: 618,828 | Gross: $257.73M

Star Trek reignites a classic franchise with action, humor, a strong story, and brilliant visuals, and will please traditional Trekkies and new fans alike.

3. Super 8 (2011)

PG-13 | 112 min | Action, Mystery, Sci-Fi

During the summer of 1979, a group of friends witness a train crash and investigate subsequent unexplained events in their small town.

Director: J.J. Abrams | Stars: Elle Fanning , AJ Michalka , Kyle Chandler , Joel Courtney

Votes: 366,511 | Gross: $127.00M

It may evoke memories of classic summer blockbusters a little too eagerly for some, but Super 8 has thrills, visual dazzle, and emotional depth to spare.

4. Star Trek Into Darkness (2013)

PG-13 | 132 min | Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi

After the crew of the Enterprise find an unstoppable force of terror from within their own organization, Captain Kirk leads a manhunt to a war-zone world to capture a one-man weapon of mass destruction.

Director: J.J. Abrams | Stars: Chris Pine , Zachary Quinto , Zoe Saldana , Benedict Cumberbatch

Votes: 496,031 | Gross: $228.78M

Visually spectacular and suitably action packed, Star Trek Into Darkness is a rock-solid installment in the venerable sci-fi franchise, even if it's not as fresh as its predecessor.

5. Star Wars: Episode VII - The Force Awakens (2015)

PG-13 | 138 min | Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi

As a new threat to the galaxy rises, Rey, a desert scavenger, and Finn, an ex-stormtrooper, must join Han Solo and Chewbacca to search for the one hope of restoring peace.

Director: J.J. Abrams | Stars: Daisy Ridley , John Boyega , Oscar Isaac , Domhnall Gleeson

Votes: 969,980 | Gross: $936.66M

Packed with action and populated by both familiar faces and fresh blood, The Force Awakens successfully recalls the series' former glory while injecting it with renewed energy.

6. Star Wars: Episode IX - The Rise of Skywalker (2019)

PG-13 | 141 min | Action, Adventure, Fantasy

In the riveting conclusion of the landmark Skywalker saga, new legends will be born-and the final battle for freedom is yet to come.

Director: J.J. Abrams | Stars: Daisy Ridley , John Boyega , Oscar Isaac , Adam Driver

Votes: 489,731 | Gross: $515.20M

Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker suffers from a frustrating lack of imagination, but concludes this beloved saga with fan-focused devotion.

List Activity

Tell your friends, other lists by baxtercallow.

list image

Recently Viewed

Collider

Every Star Trek Movie, Ranked by Box Office

S cience fiction has been integral in pushing the boundaries of storytelling forward since the inception of cinema, and the 1950s certainly saw a revival of interest in the genre. However, the debut of Star Trek changed the course of the science fiction genre forever , and continues to influence the way that the genre operates today. Gene Roddenberry ’s classic adventure series included many great episodes centering on the adventures of Captain James T. Kirk ( William Shatner ), Commander Spock ( Leonard Nimoy ), and the rest of the U.S.S. Enterprise crew that would become household names in the subsequent decades.

While the franchise is most often associated with the many television shows in its continuity , the Star Trek film franchise became a blockbuster saga in its own right . With films centered on the original cast, the new characters of Star Trek: The Next Generation , and a rebooted version of the franchise in the “Kelvin Timeline,” the Star Trek film saga is fascinating because of its three unique eras, each of which has both incredible highs and notorious failures. Here is every Star Trek movie, ranked by its global box office gross.

‘Star Trek: Nemesis’ (2002)

Worldwide gross: $67,336,470.

It’s really not all that surprising that Star Trek: Nemesis became the lowest grossing film in the Star Trek series thus far , as enthusiasm for the franchise had dwindled by the time that the fourth film starring the cast of Star Trek: The Next Generation hit theaters. Regarded as a resounding creative failure that failed to give the characters a proper sendoff, Star Trek: Nemesis brought in a measly global box office total of less than $68 million when it hit theaters in December 2002.

While the films starring the cast of Star Trek: The Next Generation never reached the popularity of their counterparts in the original series, Star Trek: Nemesis wasn’t even successful in satisfying fans of the show . The baffling decision to include Tom Hardy as Shinzon, the villainous clone of Captain Jean-Luc Picard ( Patrick Stewart ), felt like a desperate move by Paramount Pictures to inject some momentum into a franchise that was on its way out.

Star Trek: Nemesis

Release Date December 13, 2002

Director Stuart Baird

Cast LeVar Burton, Brent Spiner, Jonathan Frakes, Patrick Stewart, Marina Sirtis, michael dorn

Rating PG-13

Runtime 117

Main Genre Action

Genres Sci-Fi, Thriller, Action, Adventure

Writers Rick Berman, Gene Roddenberry, John Logan, Brent Spiner

Tagline A generation's final journey begins

Watch on Max

‘Star Trek V: The Final Frontier’ (1989)

Worldwide gross: $70,200,000.

While Leonard Nimoy proved himself to be a terrific filmmaker with his contributions to the Star Trek film franchise, the same could not be said of William Shatner. Star Trek V: The Final Frontier was Shatner’s directorial debut, and became the lowest grossing film starring the cast of the original series . With a global box office gross of just over $70 million , Star Trek V: The Final Frontier marked a significant downward spiral for the saga based on the rapturous reception that the previous few installments in the series had received.

While the franchise itself was actually on an upward swing, as Star Trek: The Next Generation had premiered to great success two years prior, the poor box office performance of Star Trek V: The Final Frontier is representative of its complete creative failures . Regarded as one of the worst in the series, the film failed to get viewers engaged in seeing it multiple times.

Star Trek V: The Final Frontier

Release Date June 9, 1989

Director William Shatner

Cast Nichelle Nichols, Walter Koenig, William Shatner, Leonard Nimoy, Deforest Kelley, James Doohan

Runtime 107 minutes

Writers Harve Bennett, David Loughery, Gene Roddenberry, William Shatner

Tagline The greatest Enterprise of all is adventure

‘Star Trek III: The Search for Spock’ (1984)

Worldwide gross: $87,000,000.

Although the classic “odd/even” rule among Star Trek fans indicates that the odd-numbered films are the weakest, Star Trek III: The Search for Spock is easily one of the most underrated films in the series . Capitalizing on the success of the previous entry, which had ended on a massive cliffhanger revolving around Spock’s fate, Star Trek III: The Search for Spock reached an impressive worldwide box office gross of $87 million .

While the film gave the series one of its best villains in Christopher Lloyd ’s Klingon warrior Kruge, Star Trek III: The Search for Spock may not have appealed to viewers outside the niche fanbase . The film is largely reliant on references to both the previous films and the original series, and may have struggled connecting with viewers that were stepping into the franchise for the first time.

Star Trek III: The Search for Spock

Release Date June 1, 1984

Director Leonard Nimoy

Cast Walter Koenig, William Shatner, George Takei, Leonard Nimoy, Deforest Kelley, James Doohan

Runtime 105

Writers Harve Bennett, Gene Roddenberry

Tagline A dying planet. A fight for life.

Website http://www.startrek.com/

‘Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan’ (1982)

Worldwide gross: $95,800,000.

Often regarded as the best and most emotional installment in the entire saga, Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan was a box office hit that set the franchise up for future success . While its predecessor had ditched the action-adventure tone of the original series for a more artistic approach, Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan felt like a return to form for the franchise. Its gross of over $95 million at the global box office is impressive considering that the original Star Trek show had been off the air for over a decade.

While fans of the franchise appreciated the more mature direction the film took, Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan may have struggled to connect with younger viewers due to its dark tone . With significantly more violence and several major character deaths, it’s easily the most intense entry in the entire franchise.

Star Trek 2: The Wrath of Khan

Release Date June 4, 1982

Director Nicholas Meyer

Runtime 113

Writers Samuel A. Peeples, Jack B. Sowards, Harve Bennett, Gene Roddenberry, Nicholas Meyer

Tagline At the end of the universe lies the beginning of vengeance.

‘Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country’ (1991)

Worldwide gross: $96,888,996.

While it failed to reach the financial highs of some of its predecessors, Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country served as a perfect sendoff for the cast of the original series . Ostensibly marketed as the “final adventure” for Kirk, Spock, and the rest of the classic U.S.S. Enterprise crew, Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country grossed over $96 million at the global box office .

While it was hardly one of the biggest blockbusters in the saga, Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country helped redeem the series after the disastrous performance by Star Trek V: The Final Frontier . By incorporating a memorable new antagonist in Christopher Plummer ’s General Chang and reflecting on the era, Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country ushered out the first iteration of the franchise, giving room for the series to evolve in its future installments.

Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country

Release Date December 6, 1991

Runtime 109

Writers Denny Martin Flinn, Mark Rosenthal, Gene Roddenberry, Lawrence Konner, Nicholas Meyer, Leonard Nimoy

Tagline The battle for peace has begun.

‘Star Trek: Insurrection’ (1998)

Worldwide gross: $117,800,000.

While the show itself produced countless great episodes , the films starring the cast of Star Trek: The Next Generation never occupied the same place with audiences that the original series cast had. While Star Trek: Insurrection performed surprisingly well at the box office considering the highly negative reviews, the film underperformed in comparison to its two direct predecessors, grossing a little over $117 million at the global box office.

The main issue was that the films starring the cast of Star Trek: The Next Generation never felt like “events,” as the series itself had only just wrapped up a few years prior. Considering audiences were used to seeing these characters on television, there was less enthusiasm behind seeing them on the big screen for what ostensibly felt like a two-part episode of the series. A lack of action and odd physical comedy certainly didn’t help Star Trek: Insurrection endear itself to fans of the show.

Star Trek: Insurrection

Release Date December 11, 1998

Director Jonathan Frakes

Cast LeVar Burton, Brent Spiner, Jonathan Frakes, Patrick Stewart, Gates McFadden, michael dorn

Runtime 103

Writers Michael Piller, Rick Berman, Gene Roddenberry

Tagline The battle for paradise has begun.

‘Star Trek Generations’ (1994)

Worldwide gross: $120,000,000.

As the first of the films starring the cast of Star Trek: The Next Generation to hit theaters, Star Trek Generations generated a lot of enthusiasm based on the popularity of the show. While the original Star Trek series was canceled after three seasons, Star Trek: The Next Generation was a major television hit that earned multiple Primetime Emmy Awards and generated enthusiasm for its memorable cast of characters . While Star Trek Generations generally failed to live up to the hype, it nonetheless succeeded in grossing $120 million at the global box office .

In addition to seeing the beloved characters hit the big screen for the first time, Star Trek Generations got a boost in popularity thanks to an appearance by Captain Kirk . Shatner’s appearance in the film was enough to generate interest from audiences who had seen the character in previous films.

Star Trek: Generations

Release Date November 18, 1994

Director David Carson

Runtime 118

Writers Rick Berman, Brannon Braga, Gene Roddenberry, Ronald D. Moore

Tagline Two captains. One destiny.

Website http://www.startrek.com/custom/include/feature/specials/generations_site/GenerationsBegin.html

‘Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home’ (1986)

Worldwide gross: $133,000,000.

While many franchises begin to run out of creative juice by the time that they reach their fourth installment , Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home outperformed its predecessors by adding more comedy and heart to the series . Although it continued the storyline introduced in Star Trek III: The Search for Spock, Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home brought the crew of the U.S.S. Enterprise to New York City for an adventure that felt like a typical 1980s comedy. With a greater appeal to non- Star Trek fans than previous entries, Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home grossed $133 million at the global box office .

While it certainly pleased fans of the franchise with its references to the past, Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home is best remembered for its important message. The film’s pro-environmentalist themes have given it much more longevity than other entries in the series.

Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home

Release Date November 26, 1986

Runtime 119

Main Genre Adventure

Genres Sci-Fi, Adventure

Writers Peter Krikes, Steve Meerson, Harve Bennett, Gene Roddenberry, Nicholas Meyer, Leonard Nimoy

Tagline How on Earth can they save the future?

‘Star Trek: The Motion Picture’ (1979)

Worldwide gross: $139,000,000.

The science fiction genre was completely re-energized by the success of Star Wars in 1977, inspiring other studios to quickly release new films within the genre by the time that the decade concluded. While it had been over a decade since the original series had been canceled, Star Trek: The Motion Picture was a box office smash hit that revitalized interest in the franchise. Earning a global box office total of $139 million , Star Trek: The Motion Picture became one of 1979’s top grossers.

The success of Star Trek: The Motion Picture is somewhat surprising considering how offbeat and cerebral the film was . Opting for a nuanced approach to sci-fi similar to 2001: A Space Odyssey, Star Trek: The Motion Picture was certainly an interesting first entry in the series due to its vast tonal and aesthetic differences with its sequels.

Star Trek: The Motion Picture

Release Date December 7, 1979

Director Robert Wise

Cast Majel Barrett, William Shatner, George Takei, Leonard Nimoy, Deforest Kelley, James Doohan

Runtime 132

Genres Mystery, Sci-Fi, Adventure

Writers Harold Livingston, Alan Dean Foster, Gene Roddenberry

Tagline The human adventure is just beginning.

‘Star Trek: First Contact’ (1996)

Worldwide gross: $150,000,000.

While Star Trek Generations has been a modest financial hit and earned mixed reviews from hardcore fans of the series, Star Trek: First Contact became the most successful film starring the cast of Star Trek: The Next Generation . With its global box office total of $150 million , the film clearly managed to satisfy both fans of the series and appeal to broader audiences.

While the storyline involving James Cromwell as the scientist Zefram Cochrane spoke of more optimistic elements of the series, Star Trek: First Contact was an action film first and foremost . By pitting Picard and his crew against the villainous Borg aliens, Star Trek: First Contact was easily the most intense entry in the series since Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan . Considering the boom in popularity of action cinema in the 1990s, it's unsurprising that Star Trek: First Contact ’s action-heavy tone yielded it great success.

Star Trek: First Contact

Release Date November 22, 1996

Runtime 111

Tagline Resistance is futile.

‘Star Trek Beyond’ (2016)

Worldwide gross: $335,673,708.

Despite a box office total of over $335 million at the global box office, Star Trek Beyond was a significant financial failure that put the future of the franchise in serious jeopardy. Despite a massive budget of $185 million and a strong marketing campaign, Star Trek Beyond grossed over $100 million less than its predecessor. Star Trek Beyond ’s underperformance is disappointing considering how thoughtful, heartfelt, and entertaining the film is in comparison to more recent iterations of the franchise.

Star Trek Beyond ’s financial underperformance has stalled work on another sequel, as a fourth entry in the “Kelvin timeline” series has been stuck in development hell for nearly a decade. Given how radically the cinematic marketplace has changed in the years since the film’s release, the Star Trek franchise will need a bold reinvention to once again rank among the industry’s most valuable franchises.

Star Trek Beyond

Release Date July 7, 2016

Director Justin Lin

Cast Sofia Boutella, Zoe Saldana, Chris Pine, Simon Pegg, Idris Elba, Shohreh Aghdashloo

Runtime 120

Genres Sci-Fi, Action, Adventure

Writers Doug Jung, Roberto Orci, Gene Roddenberry, John D. Payne, Patrick McKay, Simon Pegg

Studio Paramount Pictures

Tagline Fifty year. One legacy

Website http://www.startrekmovie.com

Watch on Paramount Plus

‘Star Trek’ (2009)

Worldwide gross: $386,839,614.

The Star Trek franchise was considered dead in the early 21st century, as the failure of the film series involving the Star Trek: The Next Generation cast and the cancellation of Star Trek: Enterprise suggested a grim future for the series. However, Paramount Pictures decided to hire Lost innovator J.J. Abrams to retool the series and effectively reboot it. 2009’s Star Trek managed to introduce the franchise to a new generation , earning an impressive global box office total of over $386 million .

While the insertion of more action certainly didn’t hurt, the Star Trek reboot succeeded because of the appeal of its new cast . Chris Pine ’s brilliant reinvention of Captain Kirk managed to endear itself to a younger generation of viewers in the same way that Shatner’s work had for previous generations. It provided a comeback for the series and was a critical hit, earning the franchise its first Academy Award for Best Makeup.

Release Date May 6, 2009

Director J.J. Abrams

Cast Eric Bana, Bruce Greenwood, Zachary Quinto, Leonard Nimoy, Chris Pine, Karl Urban

Runtime 126

Writers Roberto Orci, Alex Kurtzman, Gene Roddenberry

Tagline The future begins.

Website http://www.StarTrekMovie.com

‘Star Trek Into Darkness’ (2013)

Worldwide gross: $467,381,584.

While the way in which it retooled elements of Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan remains divisive among fans of the series, Star Trek Into Darkness was an unprecedented box office juggernaut that easily became the biggest film in the entire series. While the franchise has certainly produced some commercial hits, Star Trek Into Darkness ’ amazing global box office gross of over $467 million placed it as one of the highest grossing films of 2013.

It’s difficult to imagine the Star Trek franchise ever reaching the financial heights of Star Trek Into Darkness ever again, as the saga has stuck to its television roots in recent years. While the announcement of the Michelle Yeoh -led film Star Trek: Section 31 certainly has potential, it will take a significant marketing push to earn the same enthusiasm that Star Trek Into Darkness generated over a decade ago.

Star Trek Into Darkness

Release Date May 5, 2013

Cast Zachary Quinto, Zoe Saldana, Chris Pine, Simon Pegg, Karl Urban, John Cho

Runtime 133

Writers Roberto Orci, Alex Kurtzman, Damon Lindelof, Gene Roddenberry

Tagline Earth will Fall.

NEXT: Every Jurassic Park Movie, Ranked by Box Office

Every Star Trek Movie, Ranked by Box Office

IMAGES

  1. Star Trek (2009) : 4 choses à savoir sur le film de J.J. Abrams

    star trek movies by jj abrams

  2. 5 Major Criticisms of JJ Abrams’ Star Trek Films

    star trek movies by jj abrams

  3. Cinema-Universe: SAGA STAR TREK

    star trek movies by jj abrams

  4. The Shuttle Pod Crew Revisits The Birth Of The Kelvin Timeline In ‘Star

    star trek movies by jj abrams

  5. Star Trek Lower Decks Just Took Shots At JJ Abrams

    star trek movies by jj abrams

  6. JJ Abrams Confirms Star Trek 4 With Original Cast

    star trek movies by jj abrams

COMMENTS

  1. Star Trek (film)

    Star Trek is a 2009 American science fiction action film directed by J. J. Abrams and written by Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman.It is the 11th film in the Star Trek franchise, and is also a reboot that features the main characters of the original Star Trek television series portrayed by a new cast, as the first in the rebooted film series. The film follows James T. Kirk and Spock (Zachary ...

  2. Star Trek (2009)

    Star Trek: Directed by J.J. Abrams. With Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Leonard Nimoy, Eric Bana. The brash James T. Kirk tries to live up to his father's legacy with Mr. Spock keeping him in check as a vengeful Romulan from the future creates black holes to destroy the Federation one planet at a time.

  3. Jj Abrams Star Trek Movies In Order

    In this article, we will take a journey through the final frontier and explore JJ Abrams' Star Trek movies in order. 1. Star Trek (2009): The first installment of JJ Abrams' Star Trek trilogy takes us back to the origins of the iconic crew of the USS Enterprise. This film serves as a reboot of the original series and introduces audiences to ...

  4. List of Star Trek films

    Logo for the first Star Trek film, Star Trek: The Motion Picture (1979). Star Trek is an American science fiction media franchise that started with a television series (simply called Star Trek but now referred to as Star Trek: The Original Series) created by Gene Roddenberry.The series was first broadcast from 1966 to 1969. Since then, the Star Trek canon has expanded to include many other ...

  5. Star Trek Movies in order

    4. Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home (1986) To save Earth from an alien probe, Admiral James T. Kirk and his fugitive crew go back in time to San Francisco in 1986 to retrieve the only beings who can communicate with it: humpback whales. 5.

  6. Star Trek movies in chronological order

    2. Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan. (Image credit: Paramount Pictures) Release date: June 4, 1982. Cast: William Shatner, Leonard Nimoy, Ricardo Montalban. Ask a Star Trek fan what the best Star ...

  7. Star Trek Into Darkness (2013)

    Star Trek Into Darkness: Directed by J.J. Abrams. With Leonard Nimoy, Chris Pine, Zachary Quinto, Zoe Saldana. After the crew of the Enterprise find an unstoppable ...

  8. 12 Biggest Ways Star Trek Is Different In J.J. Abrams' Movies

    8 Vulcan Was Destroyed. Vulcan is a hugely important planet in the Prime Star Trek universe, so it was a bold statement of intent to destroy it in the first Abrams movie. The destruction of Vulcan was part of Nero's revenge for the Romulan supernova, and robbed Spock of his mother Amanda, and perhaps even his betrothed, T'Pring.

  9. The Legacy of JJ Abrams' STAR TREK

    JJ Abrams' Star Trek hit theaters on May 8, 2009. Ten years later, it remains not only an entertaining movie with an incredible cast, but it is also far more influential than it gets credit for.

  10. JJ Abrams: 'I never got Star Trek'

    Add in TV shows like Alias and Fringe, and movies like Cloverfield and Mission: Impossible III and he's one of the most powerful forces in the industry. Now, with the addition of Star Trek's ...

  11. How Many Star Trek Movies Are There?

    The most successful Star Trek movies at the box office were the three J.J. Abrams-produced films released between 2009 and 2016. However, this box office success became a curse as concerns over the box office figures for Star Trek Beyond led to difficulties in getting Star Trek 4 to theaters.

  12. ‎Star Trek (2009) directed by J.J. Abrams • Reviews, film + cast

    The fate of the galaxy rests in the hands of bitter rivals. One, James Kirk, is a delinquent, thrill-seeking Iowa farm boy. The other, Spock, a Vulcan, was raised in a logic-based society that rejects all emotion. As fiery instinct clashes with calm reason, their unlikely but powerful partnership is the only thing capable of leading their crew through unimaginable danger, boldly going where no ...

  13. In defense of the J.J. Abrams Star Trek movies

    published 28 October 2021. J.J. Abrams' Star Trek movies dared to go boldly go where 'some men' had gone before. (Image credit: Paramount Pictures) For a fanbase as passionate as the one Star Trek ...

  14. J. J. Abrams

    Jeffrey Jacob Abrams (born June 27, 1966) is an American filmmaker and composer. He is best known for his works in the genres of action, drama, and science fiction.Abrams wrote and produced such films as Regarding Henry (1991), Forever Young (1992), Armageddon (1998), Cloverfield (2008), Star Trek (2009), Star Wars: The Force Awakens (2015), and Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker (2019).

  15. Star Trek

    JJ Abrams's Star Trek: 'I went in fearing the worst, I came out a convert' ... Enterprise reprised. 2 May 2009. Star Trek's Eric Bana: 'The film's almost made for the non-fan' 6 May 2009. Most ...

  16. Discovery Officially Makes JJ Abrams' Star Trek Movies Canon

    Warning: SPOILERS for Star Trek: Discovery season 3, episode 9, "Terra Firma, Part 1".. Star Trek: Discovery season 3 has officially acknowledged the existence of the Kelvin timeline and made J.J. Abrams' Star Trek movies part of the Prime Universe canon. Now that Star Trek: Discovery is set in the 32nd century, over 900 years after the events of the prior seasons and of Abrams' trilogy, CBS ...

  17. Star Trek: J.J. Abrams teases his original cast's return in fourth film

    On Tuesday, J.J. Abrams announced plans for a fourth Star Trek film at the Paramount Investors Day presentation. The film will be directed by Matt Shakman (WandaVision) with Abrams producing, and ...

  18. Star Trek

    Star Trek reignites a classic franchise with action, humor, a strong story, ... J.J. Abrams managed to make a movie with some incredible acting and a really good story. The new actors were all ...

  19. Star Trek prequel movie from JJ Abrams in the works

    Star Trek is getting a new prequel movie produced by JJ Abrams. The filmmaker's company Bad Robot is producing an origin story set decades before Abrams' 2009 Star Trek film, which rebooted the ...

  20. J.J. Abrams Talks "Compelling" Story For 'Star Trek 4'; Chris Pine

    The saga of J.J. Abrams' attempt to follow up Star Trek Beyond with another feature film at Paramount Pictures continues with the first comments from the producer himself since his high-profile ...

  21. J.J. Abrams

    J.J. Abrams. Producer: Lost. Jeffrey Jacob Abrams was born in New York City and raised in Los Angeles, the son of TV producer parents. At 15, he wrote the music for Don Dohler's Nightbeast (1982). In his senior year of college, he and Jill Mazursky teamed up to write a feature film, which became Taking Care of Business (1990). He went on to write and produce Regarding Henry (1991) and...

  22. J.J. Abrams' Star Trek Had A 'Code Word' That Guided The Entire ...

    Abrams, coming off successful TV shows like "Lost" and his first feature film "Mission: Impossible III," was the director selected by Paramount to helm the brand-new reboot of "Star Trek."

  23. 10 Best Benedict Cumberbatch Movies, Ranked

    Director: J.J. Abrams. ... but it is a slick and engaging sci-fi movie that pushes Star Trek - for better or worse - further into action movie territory than ever before.

  24. Star Trek: Generations Could Have Been A Captain Kirk Vs ...

    David Carson's 1994 film "Star Trek: Generations" has a farfetched premise, even by Trek's own outlandish standards. ... From The Next Generation to J. J. Abrams," edited by Mark A. Altman and ...

  25. 10 Biggest Changes J.J. Abrams Made To Star Trek

    J.J. Abrams' Star Trek films reimagine the era of Star Trek: The Original Series with elements that have been adopted by the franchise's newest shows. Star Trek: Strange New Worlds borrows the most inspiration from Abrams' updated visions, as a show set aboard the USS Enterprise NCC-1701.Star Trek: Discovery has nods to alien designs and concepts that originated in the Kelvin Timeline movies.

  26. Only 5 Star Trek Movies Didn't Destroy The Starship Enterprise

    J.J. Abrams' version of the USS Enterprise NC1701 had a rough time in Star Trek into Darkness and Star Trek Beyond. However, the newly-minted Federation flagship more than holds its own against ...

  27. Star Trek Only Survived By Becoming More Like Star Wars

    Of course, the biggest example of the "Star Warsification" of Star Trek is the J. J. Abrams reboot series that started with 2009's Star Trek. Prior to the reboot, Star Trek was in a lull.

  28. Why Star Trek Uniform Colors Changed From the Original Series to Next

    These stories adhere to the division colors from TNG, but whenever the franchise goes back to pre-TNG era — including the J.J. Abrams reboot movies or Strange New Worlds — the TOS colors come ...

  29. J.J. Abrams Movies

    J.J. Abrams Movies by BaxterCallow | created - 31 May 2017 | updated - 18 Dec 2019 | Public Refine See titles to watch instantly, titles you haven't rated, etc. ... Star Trek reignites a classic franchise with action, humor, a strong story, and brilliant visuals, and will please traditional Trekkies and new fans alike. 3.

  30. Every Star Trek Movie, Ranked by Box Office

    Watch on Max 'Star Trek V: The Final Frontier' (1989) Worldwide gross: $70,200,000. While Leonard Nimoy proved himself to be a terrific filmmaker with his contributions to the Star Trek film ...