butterfly effect time travel movie

Retrospective: is The Butterfly Effect the most horrifically bleak time travel movie of all time?

Ashton Kutcher can’t help fiddling around with his tragic past in 2004’s The Butterfly Effect , an unforgettably dark sci-fi thriller. Here’s Luke Buckmaster on the film’s troubling moral questions.

The Butterfly Effect

You’ve never seen a sci-fi or a thriller quite like The Butterfly Effect : a wildly in-your-face time-travel-with-a-twist story about a man who uses his personal journals to traverse the temporal continnum, setting out to right certain wrongs—with decidedly ghastly results. Starring Ashton Kutcher in the lead role as Evan, the diary enthusiast whose written recollections form his equivalent of Doc Brown’s DeLorean, this film is so gut-wrenchingly dark and twisted I’d also call it a horror movie, with virtually no respite once its core premise swings into gear.

The horror comes in part from wince-inducing scenes that’ll have you watching through the slits of your fingers. One that involves a woman walking towards a dynamite-rigged mailbox is too disturbing to put into words; likewise for another involving a tortured animal. But the horror also comes from its stunning reversal of moral expectations: more specifically the terror of watching somebody attempt to do the right thing, while in the process unwittingly orchestrating situations a thousand times worse.

“Every time I try to help someone, everything just goes to shit,” Evan says, reinforcing a point the film makes with sledgehammer-to-the-face subtlety. Its title stems from a concept related to Chaos Theory: that a small event in one part of the world can massively affect another—the old “the butterfly flutters its wings and causes a tornado” chestnut. Co-writers and co-directors Eric Bress and J. Mackye Gruber apply that idea not to distance, but time, creating a mess of multi-versian outcomes, where the cost of fixing one or more lives is the destruction of another.

The Butterfly Effect opens with Evan in a panic, running into an office and hiding under a desk as he writes a note, reading his words aloud for the audience’s benefit: “if anyone finds this, it means my plan didn’t work and I’m already dead.” This is called beginning in media res —or “in the thick of it”—thrusting audiences into a dramatic scenario that evokes obvious questions i.e. what happened, what went wrong, does this dude suffer from some kind of iron deficiency?

The story jumps back 13 years, with Evan as a normal, nice kid, notwithstanding some moments when he does weird things he cannot recall—drawing a shockingly violent doodle in art class, for example, and holding a knife while staring menacingly ahead. A psychologist suggests he suffers from a “missing father complex” but it’s more complicated: these apparent “blackout” episodes are the moments into which he time travels. Evan discovers his unusual ability in college, revisiting his past to remedy terrible formative events.

These revolve around a childhood friend, Tommy (played in different timelines by William Lee Scott, Jesse James and Cameron Bright) who’s like the kid from The Omen or We Need to Talk About Kevin —which is to say pure, naked evil. Tommy’s sister is Evan’s love interest Kayleigh (Amy Smart, Irene Gorovaia and Sarah Widdows) and their father is a pedophile named George (Eric Stoltz).

In one chain of events, Evan travels back to scare George out of abusing Kayleigh; he’s successful, but as a consequence, George comes down extra hard on Tommy, making him even more of a monster. When released from prison he comes after Evan—culminating in a violent showdown in which Evan kills him, then goes to jail on murder charges. That’s just one example and it’s not the most hard-hitting. Eventually Bress and Gruber find some kind of compromise, delivering an ending that isn’t happy per se (in many ways it’s a downer, though nothing compared to the director’s cut ) but at least leaves the characters mostly unaffecred by Evan’s interference.

It’s rare to see a film with a moral compass like this—so grossly pessimistic and sensationally askew. You’d be excused for thinking the underlying message is: you can’t improve the world, so don’t bother trying. Evan’s father (Callum Keith Rennie), who suffers from the same curse, says as much when he screams “there is no right . You can’t change who people are , without destroying who they were .”

On the other hand, The Butterfly Effect is, in a strange way, about how our actions really can make a difference, in the sense what we do in our lives has the potential to dramatically influence the people around us. It stands to reason that, if changing things can go all bad, they could also go all good, right? After rewatching this shockingly unique and abrasively staged film, I’ll hold onto even the faintest glimmers of optimism. Time for a stiff drink.

retrospective
TIME TRAVEL

Joel Edgerton tangles with quantum physics, alternate reality and himself (kinda) in Dark Matter

In Apple TV+’s luxurious, new sci-fi Dark Matter, a man is kidnapped by himself.

The best horror movies on Amazon Prime Video New Zealand

Whatever you’re afraid of, Amazon’s streaming service certainly has a great movie about it to send shivers up your spine.

The best movies of 2024 so far… and where to watch them

These are the movies we’ve gotten excited about this year – and where you can watch them.

The rules of the rom-com run free in The Idea of You

Anne Hathaway and Nicholas Galitzine star in this newest contender for the rom-com crown.

The 20 best movies to watch on TVNZ+

We’ve combed through the extensive free-to-stream movie selection on TVNZ+.

The best TV shows on TVNZ+

No matter your tastes, there are plenty of shows on the free-to-stream local platform to sink yourself into.

The best horror movies on NEON

Find a brand new fright, or an old haunting favourite, on our list of handpicked horror selections.

The best horror movies on Netflix New Zealand

Our freshly updated guide to the best sinister, supernatural, or simply shocking Netflix horror.

Search suggestions

Movies in Cinemas
Movies & Shows Streaming
Coming Soon
News & Opinion

Get to your watchlist.

Or sign in with your email

Don’t have a Flicks account? Sign Up.

I forgot my damn password.

Keep track of the movies and show you want to see + get Flicks email updates.

Or sign up with your email

By signing up, you agree to our terms & conditions and privacy policy .

Already have a Flicks account? Sign in

Password reset

Don’t have a Flicks account? Sign Up

Remembered your password? Sign In

To post ratings/reviews we need a username. This is what will appear next to your ratings and reviews.

I don't know, create one for me

SORRY TO SAY, FLICKS NO LONGER SUPPORTS IE9

Please update to Microsoft Edge , or another browser.

Or, if you want to stick it out with Internet Explorer, please update your browser to the latest version ( IE 11 )

Cookie banner

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to improve your browsing experience on our site, show personalized content and targeted ads, analyze site traffic, and understand where our audiences come from. To learn more or opt-out, read our Cookie Policy . Please also read our Privacy Notice and Terms of Use , which became effective December 20, 2019.

By choosing I Accept , you consent to our use of cookies and other tracking technologies.

Filed under:

The Meanest Time Travel Movie Ever Made, 20 Years Later

If ‘The Butterfly Effect’ is remembered for anything, it’s unrelenting cruelty. The thing is, it was almost even crueler.

Share this story

Share this on Facebook
Share this on Twitter
Share All sharing options

Share All sharing options for: The Meanest Time Travel Movie Ever Made, 20 Years Later

In the feverish final moments of The Butterfly Effect , Evan Treborn (Ashton Kutcher) escapes his psychiatric cell, turns on an old home video of his pregnant mother, and magically wormholes his way into her womb. It’s a sacrificial last resort. Over the course of this unrelenting psychological thriller, Evan’s time travel abilities have created numerous alternate realities with disastrous ripple effects for his friends and family. Ultimately, he concludes that killing himself is the only way to ensure that his loved ones survive.

Moments later, floating in his amniotic sac, Evan wraps his umbilical cord around his neck and flatlines.

Cue the credits.

Twenty years later, the movie’s writer-directors, Eric Bress and Jon Mackye Gruber, can’t exactly remember who came up with that horrifying and twisted fade to black. “I think it was your girlfriend,” Gruber tells Bress over a recent Zoom call. Either way, the sci-fi concept, a sort of “anti– It’s a Wonderful Life ,” as Bress describes it, was the first image that unlocked one of the bleakest, meanest time travel movies of all time. “I thought the idea was really cool,” Gruber says. “You’re young and you’re being a little punk rock, and at the end of the movie, the audience is gonna sit there and go, ‘Don’t talk to me. I need to absorb what I just saw . ’”

Loosely based on chaos theory—the idea that small actions can have unpredictable and extreme consequences— The Butterfly Effect is primarily a cinematic montage of worst-case scenarios. When a college-aged Evan discovers he can portal back to his traumatic adolescence and change the past, each of his well-intentioned alterations makes things worse for those around him. In various time lines, he’s confronted with pedophilia, fatal cancer, and animal abuse. In others, his girlfriend, Kayleigh, falls victim to drug addiction, while Evan commits manslaughter and goes to prison. At one point, he even becomes a paraplegic and nearly drowns himself. No matter how many times Evan returns to the past, everyone around him ends up miserable. His death by suicide tops off two hours of philosophical misery porn.

The Ringer ’s Streaming Guide

A collage of characters from popular TV shows, from Barry to Succession

There’s a lot of TV out there. We want to help: Every week, we’ll tell you the best and most urgent shows to stream so you can stay on top of the ever-expanding heap of Peak TV.

Except audiences never saw that gut punch of an ending. Despite New Line Cinema’s initial interest in the filmmakers’ extremist sensibilities, the studio got cold feet and requested that Bress and Gruber sub in a more palatable finale. The pair eventually complied, removing the torturous miscarriage and shooting an open-ended conclusion in which Evan never befriends Kayleigh instead. When the movie debuted in theaters, the open-ended coda hit a different emotional note. “I was quite upset at the moment,” Gruber says. “I was so mentally attached to that baby ending.”

Today, the directors still have mixed feelings about it. The theatrical version, which scored big at the box office, offers a respite from the movie’s relentless pain and suffering. But the original ending, which was relegated to the director’s cut DVD, commits to Evan’s ultimate sacrifice and has since provoked ethical debates. Like their time-traveling protagonist, the filmmakers can’t help but imagine how things might have been different had the studio kept their vision two decades earlier. “I think the human mind is geared toward living in regret and what-if,” Bress says. “We’re kind of wired to do it.”

In the mid-1990s, Bress and Gruber were eager to break into Hollywood. Influenced by the decade’s indies like Clerks and Swingers , their scripts defied standard three-act structures and “went all over the place,” Bress says. But they struggled to turn heads: “We were sort of lazy writers who lived in a world of ‘Let’s reinvent the wheel over here in this loft.’”

One late night—while smoking weed—they began brainstorming about the past. At the time, Bress had been mulling over a traumatic experience he’d had with a friend. He wondered how his life might be different if he’d been able to reverse this bit of personal history. “We just played it out. ‘Well, if that had never happened, then we wouldn’t have met,’” he says. “It was just kind of fascinating to think that all these little decisions could have such a huge impact on life.” That’s when the baby ending formed, a climax that could be reverse engineered into a time-travel story. “We were still fighting the Hollywood system,” Bress says. “We just wanted it to be darker and grittier and really interesting.”

Soon, the two of them hashed out a script called Blackouts , a sci-fi drama about a kid who loses his memory at various traumatic points in his life—the moments his future self attempts to change. “We hadn’t structurally cracked the nut yet,” Gruber says. “But we thought there was something there.” The rough draft was so sinister—one scene featured an 8-year-old Evan blowing a guy’s head off with his dad’s shotgun—that it left their manager disgusted. “He was like, ‘You should not be doing this. This is not your thing,’” Gruber remembers. “He made us feel so bad about it, like it was a piece of shit.” The pair put it in a drawer. “We were kind of disappointed because we felt like, ‘Wow, there was something unique in there.’”

Two years later, a mutual friend landed them a sit-down with J.C. Spink and Chris Bender at Zide Entertainment. The two managers liked some of their scripts but asked whether the pair had anything else to share. “We’re like, ‘Well, we have this one thing, but we think it’s probably not very good …’” Gruber remembers. On a flight the next day, Bender couldn’t get over the final pages. “I distinctly remember reading the ending just before getting off the plane, and when I walked off, I called them right away,” Bender says. “I had never seen anything like that before. It’s such a disturbing idea.”

The pair’s dusty draft still needed work—the butterfly effect concept hadn’t been fully developed yet. “We really dove into the rules and logic and tried to make it all work,” Bender says. After Bress and Gruber filled in plot holes and fleshed out characters, they returned with a sanded-off script. But “there was no weight to any of the changes,” Bress says. “There was no real ride to go on.” In a sense, they overcorrected, practically pushing the story into lighthearted rom-com territory. “We wanted to make them like us. We thought maybe it was too dark our way,” Gruber says. “And then we had to realize the reason they brought us in is because they like the darkness.”

Back to the drawing board. Though both Bress and Gruber consider themselves “mischievous, not sadistic,” they also admittedly found disturbing things funny. Over the next month, they sat on their apartment floor and began thinking up the darkest, most dire outcomes and circumstances to push their protagonist over the edge. “It became patterns of just going back and forth and trying to have a progression,” Gruber says. “Each time we had to up the ante.” After tying up some loose ends with producer and writer Craig Perry, they began shopping their script around and taking meetings with various studios. “Everyone kept on saying, ‘It’s too complex, and it’s really dark, and I don’t know if there’s an audience for it,’” Gruber says.

In the face of rejection, Bress and Gruber eventually found a detour. New Line head Richard Brener was looking for writers for Final Destination 2 . He’d liked the Blackouts script and thought their sensibility might match a franchise all about killing people in eccentric ways. What are those baby-killer guys like? Brener thought. They seem to have the right temperament. The pair eventually wrote a formidable sequel and in 2002 convinced New Line to sign off on some speculative funding for their script, so long as they secured a major star. At the same time, Ashton Kutcher was looking to pivot away from comedy—what better way to do that than with a time travel movie in which his character shanks an inmate in the groin?

Shot in Vancouver on a tight schedule, The Butterfly Effect and its crew pushed things to their ethical limits. In one scene, Kayleigh’s brother traps a dog in a burlap bag, and it’s suggested that he sets the dog on fire. Gruber remembers his DP shaking his head in the midst of filming an animatronic dog inside the bag. “He goes, ‘This might be the worst thing I’ve ever shot in my career.’” In another scene , a firework explodes inside a mailbox, killing a mother and her baby. “There’s a close-up on the ground of the pacifier falling with flames on it,” Gruber says with a laugh. “There’s a couple of shots that we instinctively knew would never live in the movie, but we shot them anyway, just for our own sick amusement.”

Inspired by Requiem for a Dream and Trainspotting , the filmmakers quickly learned that their sense of humor didn’t exactly translate to the screen. Not everything would be as funny outside their on-set bubble. “Those final seconds are traumatizing,” Bress says of the firework bomb. “There is no joke—there’s no room for humor, no bandwidth for that at all.”

After watching the guys film an onslaught of cruelty, Bender began having second thoughts about the movie’s climactic sacrifice. He remembered what an older line producer told him at the start of filming. “He’s like, ‘I don’t understand why you guys want to make this movie. It seems so dark and without any hope at the end,’” Bender says. As a younger producer, he was thirsty for surprises and twist endings. But doubt was creeping in. “I remember feeling like, ‘You know, he’s not wrong.’”

Near the final days of production, Bress and Gruber started prepping for the finale. They knew that the actual strangling would take place on an ultrasound monitor, and that most of the shots inside the womb would rely on visual effects and a solemn score. Still, wanting to demonstrate Evan’s transference without being cheesy, they put out a casting call for a real newborn. As with some of the other dark scenes they had shot, things got a little awkward. “I remember the casting of the baby and wanting to make sure the baby looked fetus-like enough,” Bender says, “which is sort of a bizarre thing to be casting for.”

Eventually, they landed on a 2-week-old infant whose mother was so eager to have him on-screen that “it almost seems like she signed her baby up for SAG in the womb,” Gruber laughs. With just 20 minutes to work with, they put the baby on a lazy Susan that had been covered in a plain black cloth so that effects could be added in post. Then they draped a prosthetic umbilical cord near the baby’s throat. “The mother’s like, ‘You could put it really in there if you want,’” Gruber remembers with shock. “It was sort of scary.” But the biggest challenge was keeping their equipment dry. “The baby kept on peeing into the camera lens,” he says. “As much as we wanted it, Eric and I just felt uncomfortable.”

As the movie began wrapping up, New Line intervened. The studio had grown concerned about the ending and wanted some backup material in case audiences didn’t respond well. “I think Ashton almost didn’t want to do [the alternative ending]. He’s like, ‘Don’t even give them the option to sabotage your film,’” Gruber says. “Even [cinematographer] Matthew Leonetti said, ‘I joined this film because of that ending.’” But the first-time directors couldn’t sandbag their debut, so Bress and Gruber looked over the studio’s proposed script changes, thought up a few shot designs, and set up cameras downtown.

In the reimagined conclusion, Evan cuts ties with Kayleigh as a kid. The script then portals him back to college, where he learns everyone is unharmed. Eight years later, in New York, Evan is on the phone with his mother when he vaguely recognizes Kayleigh on the street. In the first ending, they pass each other, turn around briefly, and then go their separate ways. “He may not be in her life anymore, but she’s having a happy life,” Gruber says. “There’s resolution. It’s bittersweet, but he’s still honorable.”

But still, the studio wanted a few more options. On the next take, the directors set up the same preamble, but after the cut to New York, Evan walks by Kayleigh, pauses, and begins following her. The directors called it their “stalker version.” “We were definitely like, that is creepy ,” Bress says. “It might have come off as hopeful, like he’s giving it another shot. But the angles [looked like] he was following her down the road and sneaking up on her.”

The last take was narratively controversial: Instead of passing each other, Evan and Kayleigh stop to introduce themselves and agree to a cup of coffee. “I don’t even know why we shot that,” Bress says. “The one lesson in the film is stay out of her life. Let her live.” Ultimately, Gruber wasn’t too worried. “Eric and I were still convinced that the baby ending was living,” he says.

After a rough cut of the movie had been put together, New Line began screening the different endings for test audiences. Though the studio preferred the romantic meet-cute version, the ambiguous walk-by earned glowing reviews at the first screening. New Line was convinced enough to keep it. “They’re like, ‘It ain’t broke, why fix it?’” Gruber remembers. “We’re like, what about screening our ending? They go, ‘That’s why you’ve got DVD.’”

Gruber felt as if they’d lost their most valuable asset. The ending that had crystallized the movie—the ending that got Bender to hire them—wouldn’t hit the big screen. “It was heartbreaking for me and Eric,” Gruber says. “We wrote this when I was 25. We were like, ‘That’s just so much fucking better.’”

“It wasn’t a cop-out,” Bender says. “It was still true to the story we told. It was a choice he made. It just wasn’t as dark of a choice.”

When The Butterfly Effect premiered in theaters on January 23, 2004, the lighter ending didn’t prevent critics from scrutinizing its unstructured logic and nonstop cruelty. “There’s so much flashing forward and backward, so many spins of fate, so many chapters in the journals, that after a while I felt that I, as well as time, was being jerked around,” Roger Ebert wrote in his review. And yet audiences couldn’t get enough. The movie earned $96 million against its $13 million budget, its ambiguous ending prompting all kinds of theories. Did Kayleigh recognize him? Was she truly better off? Would Evan tempt fate and still try to get together again?

Two months later, the directors experienced the new ending’s power firsthand. Before the movie’s debut at the Brussels International Fantastic Film Festival, a journalist warned Bress and Gruber that the audience would be raucous, screaming, and throwing objects at the screen. “I’m like, ‘This is gonna be a shit show, and I’ve invited my family,’” Gruber says. The two of them started drinking. However, around halfway through the movie, the crowd went dead silent, shushing anyone who raised their voice. “It dawns on me that ‘No, they’re really into the movie, and they don’t want anyone to fuck it up for them by yelling something stupid,’” Bress says. When Evan and Kayleigh eventually passed each other and the credits rolled, the filmmakers became rock stars. “There’s a fucking eruption, like a standing ovation,” Bress says. “People were reaching to find us and touch us. It’s like we’ve made the greatest film of all time.”

That summer, when the director’s cut DVD was released, people finally got the full Butterfly Effect experience. In addition to absorbing Evan’s devastating choice to kill himself, fans were drawn to a deleted scene in which Evan’s mother remarks that she’d had a few miscarriages before giving birth to him. Another dark and depressing wrinkle emerged: Did Evan have previous siblings who had similarly tried to alter the past and killed themselves like him? “How many other possible times has this come full circle before?” Bress says. “We knew that we could drop the hints that this [decision] is coming.” The extra details provided more devastating mythology to Evan’s sacrifice and a better argument for its theatrical inclusion—and it has only continued to feed Reddit board debates full of surprised first-time watchers . In what might otherwise have been a forgotten B-movie thriller with bungled logic , the extreme notes and controversial sequences have kept The Butterfly Effect in the collective memory as one of the most visceral cinematic attempts to tackle chaos theory.

Over time, Gruber has mellowed, seeing the merits of both endings. Bress does too, though after rewatching the movie recently, he’s struck by how much they punished moviegoers. “It does not take its foot off the gas pedal,” he says. “At one point, there’s no more humor. It just goes from bad to worse.” That realization has made him want to return to the past again. Even though the meet-cute contradicts the point of Evan’s entire sacrifice, Bress still thinks about taking a time machine to test the alternate romantic ending. “I’d be really curious to see how that would affect them,” he says of their audience. “I bet a lot of people would watch that and think even higher of the film.”

This provokes another debate between them.

“If we went with a traditional ending, would we have the almost-cult status of the movie?” Gruber asks. “Or would that have ruined it?”

Bress concedes his point. “I’d be like, ‘You fool, why did you go back in time?’”

Jake Kring-Schreifels is a sports and entertainment writer based in New York. His work has also appeared in Esquire.com, GQ.com, and The New York Times .

Amanda Dobbins on the 2017 Oscars’ Best Picture Fiasco | Ringer Moments

Ryan gosling isn’t just ken, fear and longing in the teenage tv wasteland.

Ashton Kutcher, Of All People, Made a Hugely Underrated Time-Travel Thriller

Are you brave enough to revisit the horrors of... 2004 ?

The Butterfly Effect may not go down as one of sci-fi’s most impactful and intense tragedies of circumstance, but it deserves better than the critical drubbing it received in 2004. Today, free of the mockery star Ashton Kutcher tended to attract, it can be appreciated as a heartbreaking gut-punch. Between Kutcher’s surprisingly inspired dramatic performance, the film’s unfettered willingness to push boundaries and present unsettling realities, and its raw emotional core — one of the best examples of “it’s better to have loved and lost” in genre cinema — the singular experience it provides withstands the test of time better than one would assume.

Say what you will of him nowadays, but in 2004, Kutcher was beloved... for being a funny, light-hearted guy. He was doing Punk’d and starring in rom-coms and wacky comedies, at least until Eric Bress and J. Mackye Gruber’s The Butterfly Effect came along. It’s always satisfying when a performer known for their levity is given something dramatic to chew on: think Jim Carey in Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind , or Will Farrell in Stranger Than Fiction . Kutcher may not have felt like an actor capable of pulling that transition off, but despite doubts, he was a natural at tapping into the nuances of Evan Treborn.

Treborn finds himself dealing with personal demons as a result of once-blacked-out periods of his life starting to return to him as harrowing memories. The movie follows his attempts to relive these muddled moments to gain clarity, only to realize he can travel back in time and change events that made the lives of him and his loved ones a living hell. But good intentions can take us to bad places, and Treborn soon learns the cost of meddling with time.

Kutcher’s layered performance proved he understood the innocent, yearning heart of a complicated young man, but also that Evan’s impulses to change the course of his life and those of his friends were ultimately selfish. It’s the central harsh reality in a film full of harsh realities, and it’s what makes the crushing director’s cut ending — where everything is so much better for everyone in a world where Evan never existed — work.

Much of that is owed to Kutcher’s ability to meet each tragic scenario at the height of its stakes. This is an outlier opinion; contemporary critics weren’t sold on Kutcher’s turn, believing he should have stuck to comedy. But in rewatching this movie with older, more mature eyes, it’s striking how well Kutcher’s panicked efforts and dark impulses bolster the overall narrative, even if some moments make the movie feel like the early 2000s come to life. In 2009, The Guardian ’s Peter Bradshaw even argued that he and others had been a little too harsh on The Butterfly Effect, largely because of Kutcher’s reputation for immaturity. Time, ironically, continues to be kind to it.

Kutcher, seen here studying up on the finer effects of time travel.

In order for Kutcher’s performance to truly serve the story, the movie can’t hold back. The Butterfly Effect is an assault of devastation after devastation, and each catastrophe seems to spin out far beyond its reach to torch everything the eye can see. These events are life-changing and life-ruining for the characters, but the stakes are everything, so the film has to go there. Murder, sexual assault, incest, animal cruelty... it seems excessive, and on one hand, it is. The movie is memorable for tackling the worst the world has to offer, but to successfully tell a tragic parable, exaggeration helps drive the lesson home.

But for all the ugliness, the film’s most crucial element is its emotional core. “It is better to have loved and lost” is a concept that’s permeated pop culture since Tennyson wrote the famous phrase, but no film truly defines the mantra the way The Butterfly Effect does. Evan’s actions are driven by self-preservation, but his interpretation of safety always includes his childhood sweetheart Kayleigh (Amy Smart) coming out unscathed.

Part of the tragedy, of course, is that he can’t actually prevent her from meeting the horrors of life. Whenever he thinks he has, something else comes barreling along to torment her. Evan’s storyline as a frat boy happily dating Kayleigh that ends in the slaying of her sadistic brother Tommy (William Scott Leigh) is a perfect example of this perpetual doom. But no matter which ending you watch, the moral always comes back to Tennyson. Evan was always going to have to give Kayleigh up to save her, and that core is where the film’s timelessness lives.

The Butterfly Effect , regardless of its genre leanings and poor reviews, has a universal message. Everyone can relate to Evan’s relentless pursuit of harmony for his friends and family, and his unwillingness to settle for less than peace for the woman he loves. But they can also relate — some more literally than others — to the relentless obstacles he faces, and how those towering blockades can feel like an unstoppable dark destiny. Only a few special films have faced reality with such open eyes, yet so clearly reaffirmed the complexities of love and loss in their wake.

This article was originally published on Jan. 23, 2024

Science Fiction

‘The Butterfly Effect’ 20 Years Later: Exploring the Dark Side of Time Travel

From the infamous grandfather paradox to accidentally creating a timeline where Ned Flanders rules the world, there’s an element of existential horror to every single time travel story. However, it seems that most filmmakers prefer to focus on the exciting adventure aspects of these mind-bending yarns, as very few films choose to explore the terrifying personal ramifications of going back in time to mess with events in your own life.

Obviously, there are several exceptions to this “rule,” and one of the most entertaining just happens to be Eric Bress and J. Mackye Gruber’s sci-fi thriller The Butterfly Effect , an under-appreciated relic of the 2000s that I think has aged into a much better movie than most folks give it credit for. And now that we have two decades of hindsight regarding time travel cinema, I’d like to take a look back on this weird little flick and dive into why it might also appeal to horror fans.

The film that became The Butterfly Effect began its journey to the big screen as a highly-sought-after spec script that just couldn’t secure enough funding to be brought to life. It was only when Bress and Gruber made a name for themselves by writing Final Destination 2 that they managed to get a hold of Ashton Kutcher to produce and star in their long-gestating project, leading to the flick’s release in early 2004.

In the finished film, we follow Kutcher as Evan Treborn, a troubled young man who experienced a series of mysterious blackouts when he was growing up. He eventually discovers that these blackouts were the result of his ability to travel back in time and occupy his own consciousness in the past, with this discovery leading Evan to use his powers to improve his depressing present. Naturally, this temporal meddling has unforeseen consequences, and Evan soon finds himself trapped in increasingly dire timelines as he faces the titular Butterfly Effect .

SO WHY IS IT WORTH WATCHING?

Over the years, The Butterfly Effect has garnered a reputation as “ Donnie Darko for frat bros,” with a lot of cinephiles agreeing that it’s a deeply silly and excessively morbid movie that bites off more than it can chew when it comes to sci-fi shenanigans. While I can’t exactly argue that this film is an unsung masterpiece, I think folks have been way too hard on what was always meant to be just an entertaining midnight movie.

The overall plot may not stand on its own where logic is concerned (though I guess you could say the same for pretty much all time-travel flicks), but you’ve got to admit that the film does a great job of using its sci-fi elements as an excuse to explore deeply disturbing subject matter as it tells a story about coming to terms with trauma. Sure, some of these situations feel like they were ripped straight out of a soap-opera, but the exaggerated emotional stakes give the characters a chance to shine as they deal with sociopathic children, abusive parents and even dead babies.

And regardless of what you think about his career before and after Butterfly Effect , there’s no denying that Kutcher is completely dedicated to his role here. The actor supposedly conducted months of research into both psychopathology and chaos theory in order to bring the troubled Evan to life, and while not all that effort can be appreciated on-screen, you can certainly tell that he was really psyched to a part of this project.

Lastly, while this doesn’t necessarily reflect the overall quality of the movie, I also really appreciate the flick’s overall vibe . I mean, The Butterfly Effect contains some quintessential early-2000s atmosphere, with the movie being part of the so-called movement that the internet is now referring to as “nu-metal cinema.” The saturated colors and period-appropriate outfits and soundtrack may be unintentional quirks of the era, but they also make the experience feel like a snapshot of a slightly more stylish (and admittedly corny) moment in film history – which I think is quite fitting for a time travel flick.

AND WHAT MAKES IT HORROR ADJACENT?

The Butterfly Effect may not contain any out-right jump-scares or imagery traditionally associated with the horror genre, but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t tackle some downright scary ideas . From forcing the protagonist to face a sociopath hell-bent on burning his dog to death to having characters be brutally murdered, there’s no shortage of dark moments here.

Sure, the movie is regrettably blunt when dealing with some of its disturbing subject matter (like the surprisingly insensitive subplot about sexual assault in prison and the entire character of Katie’s pedophile dad), but I appreciate that the filmmakers were willing to explore the logical extremes of their intriguing premise. Hell, the movie even managed to squeeze in a little bit of body horror once Kutcher’s temporal shenanigans result in a timeline where his character loses both arms after trying to prevent a childhood tragedy.

However, one of the most horrific aspects of the film didn’t actually make it to the theatrical release, as the studio originally opted to change Bress and Gruber’s original ending due to its uncomfortable implications. And while I have some reservations about the director’s cut (mostly due to it feeling like It’s a Wonderful Life in reverse), I’d argue that it’s the more interesting version of the film and worth seeking out if you’ve only ever seen the theatrical cut.

The Butterfly Effect is far from a perfect film, suffering from inconsistent time-travel logic and more than a few groan-worthy plot contrivances, but I think it’s still a really great time if you can set logic aside and simply enjoy the ride. While I understand that some viewers may be put off by the more edgy and mean-spirited elements of the flick, I think this blast from the past is just as effective today as it was back in ’04.

There’s no understating the importance of a balanced media diet, and since bloody and disgusting entertainment isn’t exclusive to the horror genre, we’ve come up with Horror Adjacent – a recurring column where we recommend non-horror movies that horror fans might enjoy.

Born Brazilian, raised Canadian, Luiz is a writer and Film student that spends most of his time watching movies and subsequently complaining about them.

Six Post-Apocalyptic Thrillers to Watch While You Wait for “Fallout” Season 2

Despite ancient humans having already overcome several potential doomsday scenarios in real life, post-apocalyptic fiction used to be relatively rare until the invention of the atomic bomb convinced us that the end of the world could be just around the proverbial corner.

Since then, we’ve seen many different stories about the collapse of civilization and the strange societies that might emerge from the rubble, but I’d argue that one of the most interesting of these apocalyptic visions is the post-nuclear America of the iconic Fallout games. A witty satire of American jingoism and cold war shenanigans, it’s honestly baffling that it so long for us to finally see a live-action adaptation of this memorable setting.

Thankfully, Graham Wagner and Geneva Robertson-Dworet’s Fallout TV show isn’t just a great adaptation – it’s also an incredibly fun standalone story that makes the most of its post-apocalyptic worldbuilding. And since fans are going to have to wait a while to see the much-anticipated second season, we’ve decided to come up with a list highlighting six post-apocalyptic thrillers to watch if you’re still craving more Fallout !

As usual, don’t forget to comment below with your own apocalyptic favorites if you think we missed a particularly fun one. And while it’s not on the list, I’d also like to give a shout-out to The Hughes Brothers’ underrated post-apocalyptic action flick The Book of Eli – which I recently covered in its own article.

With that out of the way, onto the list…

6. The Divide (2011)

Xavier Gens may be best known for his memorable contribution to the New French Extremity movement – with the eerily prescient Frontière(s) – but the filmmaker is also responsible for a handful of underrated thrillers that flew under the radar despite being legitimately solid films. One of the most interesting of these flicks is 2011’s The Divide , a single-location exercise in claustrophobic tension.

Telling the story of a group of New Yorkers who find themselves trapped in a bomb shelter after a surprise nuclear attack, this dark thriller is more interested in the ensuing social chaos than effects-heavy physical destruction. And while critics at the time were horrified by the bleak story and cynical characters, I think this mean streak is precisely what makes The Divide worth watching.

5. The Day After (1983)

One of the highest-rated TV films of all time, ABC’s The Day After is one of the scariest movies ever made despite being more of a speculative docu-drama than an actual genre flick. Following an ensemble of families, doctors and scientists as they deal with the horrific aftermath of all-out nuclear war, this radioactive cautionary tale was vital in convincing real-world politicians to review their policies about nuclear deterrence.

In fact, the film is even credited with scaring President Ronald Reagan into changing his mind about expanding the United States’ nuclear arsenal, with this new stance eventually leading to a treaty with the Soviet Union. With a story this powerful, I think it’s safe to say that The Day After is a must watch for Fallout fans interested in the more down-to-earth elements of the apocalypse.

4. The Postman (1997)

If I had a nickel for each unfairly maligned post-apocalyptic epic starring Kevin Costner that was released in the 90s, I’d have two nickels – which isn’t a lot, but it’s weird that it happened twice. And while Waterworld has since seen a resurgence in popularity with fans defending it as a bizarrely expensive B-movie, I haven’t seen a lot of discussion surrounding 1997’s more serious vision of a fallen America, The Postman .

Following Costner (who also directed the flick) as a post-apocalyptic nomad who begins to rebuild America by pretending to be a member of the newly reformed postal service, this David Brin adaptation is consistently fascinating – especially if you view the story as a cynical fairy-tale, which was Costner’s original intention.

And while the flick suffers from some goofy dialogue and a bloated runtime, it makes up for this by having directly inspired Hideo Kojima’s Death Stranding .

3. Turbo Kid (2015)

Turbo Kid may have been billed as an indie Mad Max with bicycles instead of cars, but François Simard, Anouk Whissell and Yoann-Karl Whissell’s comedic throwback to the post-apocalyptic future of 1997 is much more than meets the eye. From quirky characters to madly creative designs, the flick rises above nostalgia bait by being a legitimately fun time even if you don’t get the copious amounts of ’80s and ’90s references.

And despite the horror-inspired ultraviolence that colors the frequent action scenes as we follow a young comic-book fan deluding himself into thinking that he’s a superhero, it’s the childlike sense of wonder that really makes this a treat for cinephiles. It’s just a shame that we’re still waiting on the sequel that was announced back in 2016…

2. Six-String Samurai (1998)

A lo-fi homage to spaghetti westerns and classic samurai films – not to mention the golden age of rock ‘n roll – Six-String Samurai is a must-watch for those who appreciate weird cinema. While I’ve already written about the madly creative vibes that make this such an entertaining flick , I think it’s worth repeating just in case some of you have yet to give this musical fever dream a try.

And appropriately enough for this list, the film was also a source of inspiration for the 3D Fallout games – especially Obsidian’s fan favorite New Vegas . The game even includes a New Vegas Samurai achievement (unlocked by killing enemies with a katana) with a vault-boy illustration modeled after the film’s rendition of Buddy Holly.

1. A Boy and His Dog (1975)

The grisly post-apocalyptic comedy that inspired the original Fallout games, L.Q. Jones’ adaptation of Harlan Ellison’s novella is just as shocking today as it was back in ’75. Telling the story of a teenage scavenger who travels the wastelands of 2024 America alongside his telepathic canine companion , A Boy and His Dog feels like a Heavy Metal comic brought to life.

While the film’s rampant misogyny and brutal violence make it tough to revisit under modern sensibilities, it’s still a landmark in post-apocalyptic cinema and one hell of a memorable ride. Not only that, but the flick also inspired the creation of Fallout’ s most beloved NPC, the ever-loyal Dogmeat.

‘Infested’ Review – One of the Best Spiders Attack Horror Movies in Years

Limited Edition Morticia & Wednesday Addams ‘Monster High’ Dolls Releasing Next Week!

Isla (Alix West Lefler) holds up a hand covered in bees

‘The King Tide’: An Island Town Rots with Moral Decay in Canadian Folk Horror Fable [Review]

5 Deep Cut Horror Movies to Seek Out in May 2024

TWO New ‘Evil Dead’ Movies Now in the Works; Sébastien Vaniček & Francis Galluppi Directing

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Sign up for the Rotten Tomatoes newsletter to get weekly updates on:

Upcoming Movies and TV shows
Trivia & Rotten Tomatoes Podcast
Media News + More

By clicking "Sign Me Up," you are agreeing to receive occasional emails and communications from Fandango Media (Fandango, Vudu, and Rotten Tomatoes) and consenting to Fandango's Privacy Policy and Terms and Policies . Please allow 10 business days for your account to reflect your preferences.

OK, got it!

Movies / TV

No results found.

What's the Tomatometer®?
Login/signup

Movies in theaters

Opening this week
Top box office
Coming soon to theaters
Certified fresh movies

Movies at home

Fandango at Home
Netflix streaming
Prime Video
Most popular streaming movies
What to Watch New

Certified fresh picks

The Fall Guy Link to The Fall Guy
I Saw the TV Glow Link to I Saw the TV Glow
The Idea of You Link to The Idea of You

New TV Tonight

Hacks: Season 3
The Tattooist of Auschwitz: Season 1
Shardlake: Season 1
A Man in Full: Season 1
The Veil: Season 1
Star Wars: Tales of the Empire: Season 1
Acapulco: Season 3
Welcome to Wrexham: Season 3
John Mulaney Presents: Everybody's in LA: Season 1
My Next Guest Needs No Introduction With David Letterman: Season 4.2

The Butterfly Effect

Where to watch.

Rent The Butterfly Effect on Fandango at Home, Prime Video, or buy it on Fandango at Home, Prime Video.

What to Know

The premise is intriguing, but it's placed in the service of an overwrought and tasteless thriller.

Audience Reviews

Cast & crew.

J. Mackye Gruber

Ashton Kutcher

Evan Treborn

Kayleigh Miller

Eric Stoltz

George Miller

William Lee Scott

Tommy Miller

More Like This

Critics reviews.

How The Butterfly Effect's Time Travel Works

Hello friends and fellow travelers, and welcome back for a new adventure here at the CinemaBlend labs! When we last met, we got to dig into the temporal madness of Terry Gilliam’s 12 Monkeys , and yes, that was young Brad Pitt ’s butt! Also, if that film is to be believed, fate is a horrific mistress we cannot run from, no matter how many random voice mails you leave for future posterity. Quick sidetrack: does anyone else think 12 Monkeys would make a good double feature with Tenet ? Well, there’s no need to worry about that now, as this time out, we’ll be time traveling with Ashton Kutcher, as he tries to use The Butterfly Effect to create the perfect life.

If you really want to read a breakdown of Tenet , or any other time related adventure we’ve tackled during out studies in traveling from here to there in the then and now, you can always travel into our archives and read our studies nice and carefully. Though, it should be noted, that if you subscribe to the method of time travel that The Butterfly Effect displays throughout its twisted tale, you might not want to read too carefully. As an example of why you should be careful, I just opened up our past examination of the Happy Death Day time loops , and had to figure out how to escape all three loops that writeup entailed. Grab some compositional notebooks, a freshly sharpened pencil, and a ton of tissues with Aloe, as we’re about to dive into The Butterfly Effect’s chaotic theory on time travel.

The Butterfly Effect Evan, Kayleigh, and Lenny talk with Tommy before the prank

The Time Travel in The Butterfly Effect

Living in suburbia already has enough of a bum rap, but the lives of Evan Treborn ( Ashton Kutcher ) and Kayleigh Miller (Amy Smart) are filled with traumas all the way down. The pair of childhood sweethearts seem to be separated by fate, with Evan swearing to carve the perfect path for the two of them to live on. Which is where the young man’s time traveling abilities come into play.

Who's Time Traveling

Blessed (or cursed, depending on how you see things) with the hereditary ability to travel back in time, Evan is one of two time travelers that we know of in The Butterfly Effect . The only other person we see with those abilities is Jason (Callum Keith Rennie), Evan’s father.

From When To When

While there’s no exact time frame given to The Butterfly Effect’s chain of events, there’s an easy chain of clues to give us the three years that make up the film’s storyline. This time span is based off of the fact that in their teenage years, Evan and his friends go to see Se7en in its theatrical release, which happened in 1995. Using that as a benchmark, the childhood events six years prior would have taken place in 1989, with the bulk of the “present day” story being set seven years later, in 2002. So Evan’s traveling between events that take place in 1989, 1995, and 2002.

CINEMABLEND NEWSLETTER

Your Daily Blend of Entertainment News

The Purpose Of Their Trip

The one thing that Evan really wants in life is to be able to live in peace, with Kayleigh by his side. After accidentally triggering her suicide in the initial timeline of The Butterfly Effect , Evan gets the bright idea to revisit key points of traumatic events in their childhood, in order to fix their collective fate. But what starts out as a quest to save one life turns into a chain reaction that ruins several in its wake; leaving Evan to make another trip, in hopes that it will be the one to correct the entire mess.

The Butterfly Effect Evan writes in his journal

How Time Travel Happens In The Butterfly Effect

Good news, time travelers! The Butterfly Effect doesn’t require any sort of special computers of doom , hijacked alien vessels , or 1.21 Gigawatt lightning strikes that mimic the presence of plutonium! In a story that sees tons of problems crop up in the lives of Evan and his friends, all of the good news we can get is much appreciated. All you really need to time travel is a really good memory, thanks to a habit of keeping journals throughout your traumatic, blackout filled childhood.

Plagued by moments of lost time throughout his life, Evan is told to keep a journal of his memories, so he can more easily fill in the gaps he’s been experiencing. However, those journals, and his inherited abilities, are the ultimate method of time travel in The Butterfly Effect . All Evan has to do is concentrate on his journals extra hard, read back the memories he’s written down, and he’s transported back to the moments he wants to go to in order to potentially change everyone’s fate. This method also works with home movies, something that comes in handy when it comes to Evan’s final time traveling trip in the big finale.

Revisiting a memory can bring him back to that time and be in control of his past self.

The Butterfly Effect Kayleigh and Evan share a booth at the diner

Can History Be Changed As A Result Of Time Travel In The Butterfly Effect?

In the history of time travel examinations I’ve conducted here at the CinemaBlend labs, this is probably the most chaotic example of history being changed through the usage of time travel. Not to mention The Butterfly Effect takes its name from a bedrock set of principles in Chaos Theory that dictate the unpredictable nature one decision can have on changing the flow of time. At this point, I’d like to just say a quick thank you to two pioneers of Chaos Theory: Dr. Ian Malcolm and author Ray Bradbury !

As we see throughout Evan’s actions throughout his quest to create the perfect version of his life with Kayleigh, the more he tries to change things, the more out of control things get.

With Evan’s life alone, we see him go from a simple psych student to a frat boy, an amputee, a prisoner, and an unintentional murderer. Travelling back in time to key hinge points in his own timeline, The Butterfly Effect sees our protagonist, and everyone around him, changing with every alteration he decides to put into play. Each time, that decision rewrites the entirety of the timeline from that moment forward, with some pretty severe consequences on the line.

The Butterfly Effect Evan tries to look innocent in the exam room

What Are The Consequences Of Time Travel In The Butterfly Effect?

Evan’s trials and tribulations in The Butterfly Effect lead to all sorts of variations in his life, ranging from something as small as a cigarette burn to larger consequences like the deaths and/or traumas of his friends and family. There’s also a physical toll that Evan’s journey takes on him, as while he’s able to remember everything from the various timelines, by the time he gets to the final iteration, he’s packed on about 40 years worth of memories. With each new trip, each deviation from the previous timeline, Evan’s mind becomes more physically damaged and he come back with increasingly severe nosebleeds.

The Butterfly Effect does ultimately arrive at Evan arriving at a crossroads that see him arrive at one final play to save his life, and the lives of all around him. One path leads to a happier/bittersweet result, while the other is the darkest timeline possible. Depending on which cut you watch, the result differs drastically.

The Best Scenario In The Butterfly Effect

In the theatrical cut of The Butterfly Effect, Evan uses his mother’s home movies and goes back to the birthday party where he and Kayleigh met, circa 1989. Evan tells Kayleigh that he hates her, as well as delivers the ultimatum that if she ever comes near him again, “I’ll kill you and your whole damned family.” This scares Kayleigh into going to live with her mother, instead of her father, which wipes the entire history between Kayleigh, Tommy, Lenny, and Evan.

Kayleigh and Tommy live a happy life with their mother, while Evan and Lenny remain friends through life. Eventually, the boys even become college roommates; though the awesome memories of Ethan Suplee’s Thumper will live on forever. However, Evan does find Kayleigh again in 2002, as they pass as strangers in New York. Depending on which of the four endings to The Butterfly Effect you watch, the two friends either keep going their separate ways, or reconnect with a chance of paving the way to a new future together. Either way, someone who looks a lot like Demi Moore is probably on the other end of that phone call, as this flash forward is supposed to take place in 2010; provided our timeline math holds up.

The Worst Scenario In The Butterfly Effect

If you watched the Director’s Cut of The Butterfly Effect, there’s a totally different, much darker fate that awaits Evan. Rather than just separating himself from Kayleigh altogether, Evan thinks that the world would be a lot better off without him. This is supported by a deleted scene where a fortune teller literally tells him that he was “never meant to be,” and that he doesn’t even have a soul.

By time the ending to the Director’s Cut kicks in, the home movie Evan’s watching is the day that his mother gave birth to him. Just when you thought The Butterfly Effect couldn’t get any darker, our protagonist goes back to his own birth, and kills himself by strangulation in the womb. And based on the voice over from Evan’s mother Andrea (Melora Walters) that plays during his death, this might be the fourth time this sort of scenario has happened. With Evan out of the picture, the rest of the Theatrical Cut’s events occur, with Tommy and Kayleigh straightening up and Lenny never finding himself traumatized into a catatonic state.

The Butterfly Effect Evan walks away from Kayleigh

We'll Come Back For You

Friends and fellow travelers, thank you so much for taking this dark journey into the heart of The Butterfly Effect! If you like what you’ve seen, I’d like to remind you that you can hit the CinemaBlend Time Travel Archives and see past studies in temporal madness. Not to mention, if there’s a time travel story you really want to see broken down through our scientific methods, you can drop us a line and we’ll grab it in time. In fact, our next trip is one we’ve been looking forward to for a while, and it also came up as a suggestion from one of you fantastic fans!

Looks like it’s time to go back to space, the final frontier… again. You asked for it, you’ve been waiting for it, and I literally threw this into my list of initial stories to examine; yes folks, Star Trek ‘09 is next in the lineup! Which means I’ll need to fill out some pre-expedition paperwork with Tempus Fugit Insurance , so the inevitable damage claims get processed and paid in time.

Mike Reyes is the Senior Movie Contributor at CinemaBlend, though that title’s more of a guideline really. Passionate about entertainment since grade school, the movies have always held a special place in his life, which explains his current occupation. Mike graduated from Drew University with a Bachelor’s Degree in Political Science, but swore off of running for public office a long time ago. Mike's expertise ranges from James Bond to everything Alita, making for a brilliantly eclectic resume. He fights for the user.

10 Billie Eilish Red Carpet Looks That Challenged Norms For Women’s Fashion

The 32 Best LGBTQ+ Movies As Ranked By Rotten Tomatoes

Robert Downey Jr. Defends Thor After Chris Hemsworth Said He Felt Like A ‘Security Guard’ In Early MCU Films

5 Great Movies That Use The Butterfly Effect To Tell Their Stories

Even a tiny change in the past is enough to drastically alter the future. These mind-bending movies showcased the Butterfly Effect at its best.

The Butterfly Effect is part of the Chaos Theory that suggests that small, almost imperceptible changes in one part of a complex system can produce huge, unexpected results elsewhere. Jeff Goldblum’s character in Jurassic Park has iconically described it as a flap of a butterfly’s wings in the Amazonian jungle causing rain instead of sunshine in Central Park. It gets more complicated from there.

Numerous movies have explored the topic of the Butterfly Effect, where a single choice can alter the protagonist’s timeline. It seems that their characters are not familiar with the number one rule of any self-respecting time traveler — don’t change any detail in the past, no matter how small or seemingly trivial, or face the drastic consequences in the future. Instead, they keep ‘correcting’ their past choices in the hope of getting a better outcome. It’s like they’ve never seen Back to the Future .

RELATED: 5 Horror Movies That Involve Time Travel

One of the first movies to masterfully employ the Butterfly Effect-style plotline was the1981 (though released only in 1987 due to political censorship) Polish-language film Blind Chance , directed by Krzysztof Kieslowski. It explored three vastly different timelines created by a man catching or missing his train. The film covering tough topics like politics and religion set the bar high and prompted a wave of time-twisting, mind-bending features. These movies are excellent examples of the Butterfly Effect in action and a must-watch for any alternate reality-loving fan .

Frequency (2000)

Gregory Hoblit’s sci-fi thriller follows John Sullivan (Jim Caviezel), a homicide detective who finds a way to communicate with his firefighter father, Frank (Dennis Quaid), 30 years in the past over a HAM radio. John warns Frank about his impending death in a warehouse fire, therefore saving him but setting in motion a chain of events that leads to his mother’s murder. The father and son then join forces to find the killer and change the past/future once again.

The film is a rare case where time meddling results in an improved timeline rather than a metaphorical train wreck, common for the similarly-themed movies — a casually-dropped tip about an early investment in Yahoo! would do that. Frequency takes the Butterfly Effect and wraps it into a fast-paced and engaging thriller, well worthy of the attention of any sci-fi and action-loving fan.

Mr. Nobody (2009)

This sci-fi drama starring Jared Leto , Diane Kruger, Sarah Polley, and Rhys Ifans is a dazzling, thought-provoking, and philosophical piece that gained a cult status over the years. The splintering story follows Nemo Nobody (Leto), the last mortal on Earth left after the human race achieved quasi-immortality. Due to an anomaly occurring during his conception, Nemo can recall all the possible futures created by his life-altering choices — starting with a fundamental decision of whether to stay with his father or mother after their divorce — making the journalist interviewing him at the age of 118 struggle to determine the ‘real’ timeline.

Right from the start, the film introduces the concept of the Butterfly Effect, beautifully showcased by a floating leaf that causes Nemo’s parents to meet. It picks up from there, building into a wonderful cacophony of alternate realities and depicting a man at a constant crossroad. Mr. Nobody ’s non-linear, mind-bending narrative, gorgeous cinematography, deep characters, and exceptional soundtrack all rightfully make it one of the most iconic yet underappreciated movies diving into the countless ‘what if’ scenarios and outcomes.

Run Lola Run (1998)

Fast-paced, action-packed, and visually stunning, Run Lola Run became a cult classic, beloved by both its original German and international audience . Written and directed by Tom Tykwer, the movie follows Lola (Franka Potente), who has twenty minutes to reach her boyfriend, Manni (Moritz Bleibtreu), who messed up and now needs to get 100,000 Deutsche Mark or his boss will kill him. In three subsequent scenarios, Lola makes choices that alter the outcome and impact the fates of several side characters in the process.

Run Lola Run is an exhilarating ride, backed by a heart-pumping soundtrack, extraordinary cinematography, and electric chemistry between the main characters. Masterfully playing with the mix of the Butterfly Effect — true to its tagline “Every second of every day you make a choice that can change your life” — and Groundhog Day , the film is just as much a thought-provoking crime drama as it is a nail-biting action.

Donnie Darko (2001)

The director Richard Kelly will be forever remembered for creating the most puzzling, dark, and bizarre cinematic experience that is Donnie Darko — a movie that reached cult status by deliberately messing with people’s heads and leaving them deeply impacted but utterly confused. The story follows Donnie (Jake Gyllenhaal), a moody teenager who is saved by a mysterious figure in a creepy bunny costume that calls him out of the room just moments before a jet engine crashes into it. After that, the rabbit, also known as Frank , tells Donnie the world will end in 28 days and convinces him to commit a series of crimes, which have unpredictable consequences for the people around him.

Donnie Darko feverishly throws together Butterfly Effect, Chaos Theory, time travel, paradoxes, quantum physics, and dream-like near-madness, creating an unparalleled experience. With the stellar, spot-on cast featuring Maggie Gyllenhaal, Drew Barrymore, Patrick Swayze, and Jena Malone and an unexpectedly twisted circular narrative, the movie remains one of the oddest and most intriguing features that leave the audience forever wondering what it all really meant.

The Butterfly Effect (2004)

It only makes sense to include this film among the others. Co-directed and co-written by Eric Bress and J. Mackye Gruber, famous for the Final Destination series , this sci-fi drama follows a college student, Evan Treborn (Ashton Kutcher), who discovers he inherited the ability to time travel and decides to change the traumatic events that affected him and his friends in the past. Of course, nothing is simple, and his actions have dire and unfortunate consequences on the present.

Unlike Frequency or Back to the Future , The Butterfly Effect is a cautionary tale that suggests that the best thing a time traveler can do — unless they want to keep spreading pain and misery — is nothing. While the film’s original ending was much darker (featuring a pre-natal suicide), the movie famously ends on a bittersweet note, with Evan sacrificing his chance for true love to save the ones he cares about.

While The Butterfly Effect has been criticized for the inaccurate representation of the theory — Evan accurately calculating the odds for the best outcome technically goes against the chaos and unpredictability at the principle’s core — it remains an exciting, mind-twisting, and beautiful experience and a must-watch for any sci-fi fan with a soft spot for time-traveling romance.

MORE: 5 90s Horror Movie Twists That Stand The Test Of Time

40 Facts About The Movie The Butterfly Effect

Written by Elfreda Bellows

Modified & Updated: 05 Mar 2024

Reviewed by Jessica Corbett

40-facts-about-the-movie-the-butterfly-effect

The Butterfly Effect is a captivating and mind-bending movie that has fascinated audiences since its release. Directed by Eric Bress and J. Mackye Gruber, this psychological thriller takes viewers on a thrilling journey through the concept of time travel and the consequences of altering the past. Released in 2004, the film stars Ashton Kutcher, Amy Smart, and Eric Stoltz, delivering powerful performances that bring the complex storyline to life.

In this article, we will delve into 40 intriguing facts about The Butterfly Effect that even the most devoted fans of the movie may not be aware of. From behind-the-scenes revelations to interesting trivia about the cast and production, these facts will shed light on the intricate details and hidden gems that make this film an enduring favorite for cinephiles.

Key Takeaways:

The Butterfly Effect, released in 2004, stars Ashton Kutcher and explores the idea that small actions can have big consequences, making it a thought-provoking and emotionally-charged movie.
The movie’s nonlinear storytelling, dark themes, and iconic twist ending have made it a cult classic with a dedicated fan base, sparking philosophical discussions about fate and free will.

The Butterfly Effect was released in 2004.

The movie, directed by Eric Bress and J. Mackye Gruber, made its debut in theaters in It quickly gained popularity and became a cult classic.

Ashton Kutcher stars as the lead character, Evan Treborn.

Ashton Kutcher, known for his comedic roles, took on a more serious and dramatic role as Evan Treborn, a young man who discovers he can travel back in time and alter the past.

The movie explores the concept of the butterfly effect.

The butterfly effect is the idea that small actions can have major consequences. In the movie, Evan’s time travel experiments reveal the profound impact his actions have on the future.

The Butterfly Effect has multiple alternative endings.

The filmmakers created several different endings for the movie, each with its own twist and outcome. This allowed audiences to interpret the story in different ways and added to the film’s intrigue.

It has a nonlinear narrative structure.

The movie jumps back and forth in time, showcasing different versions of events that shape Evan’s life. This unconventional storytelling technique adds to the suspense and keeps viewers engaged.

The film tackles sensitive topics such as child abuse and mental illness.

The Butterfly Effect delves into heavy themes and explores the psychological impact of traumatic experiences on a person’s life. It is a thought-provoking and emotionally-charged movie.

The movie’s tagline is “Change one thing, change everything.”

This tagline encapsulates the central concept of the butterfly effect and hints at the repercussions of Evan’s time travel experiments.

The Butterfly Effect was a commercial success.

The movie grossed over $96 million worldwide, making it a financial success for the filmmakers. It also gained a significant following after its release.

It received mixed reviews from critics.

Critics had varying opinions about The Butterfly Effect. While some praised its ambitious storytelling and powerful performances, others found it confusing or overly dark.

The movie has a dedicated fan base.

The Butterfly Effect has garnered a dedicated fan base over the years, with many viewers appreciating its thought-provoking themes and mind-bending plot twists.

The film’s soundtrack features popular songs from the early 2000s.

The soundtrack includes tracks from artists such as Coldplay , Evanescence, and Blink-182, adding depth and emotion to the movie’s scenes.

The Butterfly Effect has inspired several sequels and spin-offs.

The success of the original movie led to the production of two direct-to-video sequels and a standalone film loosely connected to the franchise.

It was initially considered a risky project.

Due to its complex storyline and dark themes, The Butterfly Effect was initially seen as a gamble by the studio. However, it proved to be a successful and memorable film.

The movie’s production budget was $13 million.

Despite its relatively low budget, The Butterfly Effect was able to deliver impressive visual effects and a captivating story.

The film received an R rating.

The Butterfly Effect contains violent and disturbing scenes, which warranted an R rating. It is not suitable for younger audiences.

The Butterfly Effect explores the concept of fate versus free will.

Throughout the movie, Evan grapples with the idea of whether his actions can truly change the course of his life or if fate is ultimately in control.

The movie was shot in Vancouver, Canada.

The film’s production took place in Vancouver, which served as the backdrop for Evan’s journey through time.

The script for The Butterfly Effect was originally titled “The Chaos Theory.”

The initial title of the movie referred to the scientific concept that small changes in initial conditions can lead to drastically different outcomes.

The Butterfly Effect has gained a reputation as a cult classic.

Over the years, the movie has developed a strong cult following, with fans appreciating its unique storytelling and engaging performances.

The film’s success helped solidify Ashton Kutcher’s transition into more serious roles.

Ashton Kutcher’s portrayal of Evan Treborn showcased his versatility as an actor, enabling him to take on more complex and dramatic roles in the future.

The Butterfly Effect explores the idea of unintended consequences.

Evan’s time travel experiments often lead to unintended and unforeseen consequences, highlighting the potential dangers of altering the past.

The movie’s title refers to the butterfly effect theory coined by mathematician Edward Lorenz.

The concept of small actions having significant consequences is often associated with Edward Lorenz’s discovery of the butterfly effect within chaos theory.

The Butterfly Effect delves into the blurred boundaries between reality and memory.

Evan’s ability to change the past raises questions about the nature of reality and the reliability of one’s memories.

The production team considered several other actors for the lead role before casting Ashton Kutcher.

Actors such as Jake Gyllenhaal and Josh Hartnett were considered for the role of Evan Treborn before Ashton Kutcher was ultimately chosen.

The movie’s twist ending has become iconic.

The Butterfly Effect’s surprising twist ending has become one of the most memorable aspects of the film, leaving viewers with lingering questions and interpretations.

The movie’s release date was delayed due to its dark themes and ending.

The studio initially hesitated to release the film, concerned about its dark themes and the impact it could have on audiences. This led to a delay in its release.

The Butterfly Effect features a stellar supporting cast.

In addition to Ashton Kutcher, the movie includes talented actors such as Amy Smart, Elden Henson , and Eric Stoltz in pivotal roles.

It explores the concept of memory repression and retrieval.

Evan’s journey through his past forces him to confront repressed memories and explore the ways in which memory can shape one’s perception of reality.

The film’s cinematography enhances its dark and atmospheric tone.

The visuals in The Butterfly Effect, including the use of lighting and colors, contribute to the film’s overall dark and atmospheric ambiance.

The movie’s concept has sparked philosophical discussions.

The Butterfly Effect’s exploration of time travel and the consequences of altering the past has prompted philosophical debates about determinism, free will, and the nature of reality.

The Butterfly Effect has a nonlinear timeline.

The events in the movie do not follow a linear sequence, creating a sense of disorientation and uncertainty that mirrors Evan’s experience.

The film received an MTV Movie Award nomination for Best Breakthrough Male Performance for Ashton Kutcher.

Ashton Kutcher’s portrayal of Evan Treborn earned the actor recognition and a nomination at the MTV Movie Awards.

The Butterfly Effect contains intense and emotional scenes.

The movie explores heavy emotional themes and features scenes that can be emotionally challenging for viewers.

The film’s title has become synonymous with the concept of the butterfly effect itself.

The phrase “the butterfly effect” is often associated with The Butterfly Effect movie, popularizing the concept and its implications in popular culture.

The movie’s nonlinear narrative structure serves as a metaphor for Evan’s fragmented memories.

The fragmented nature of the film’s storytelling reflects the fragmented memories and experiences of the protagonist.

The Butterfly Effect had a successful DVD release.

The movie gained a strong following through its DVD release, allowing viewers to revisit the story and analyze its intricacies.

The film’s themes resonate with audiences on a personal level.

The Butterfly Effect’s exploration of regret, redemption, and the consequences of our choices resonates with audiences who reflect on their own lives and decisions.

The movie’s ending leaves room for interpretation.

The ambiguous and thought-provoking ending of The Butterfly Effect allows viewers to draw their own conclusions about Evan’s ultimate fate.

The Butterfly Effect showcases the butterfly effect in its most extreme form.

The movie pushes the boundaries of the butterfly effect concept, portraying the drastic and unforeseen consequences of Evan’s actions.

The Butterfly Effect continues to captivate new generations of viewers.

Even years after its release, The Butterfly Effect remains a popular choice for movie enthusiasts, introducing the concept of the butterfly effect to new audiences.

In conclusion, “The Butterfly Effect” is a thought-provoking and captivating movie that explores the fascinating concept of time travel and the repercussions of altering the past. With an engaging storyline, brilliant performances, and clever plot twists, this film has become a cult classic in the science fiction genre. Its exploration of cause and effect, as well as the moral implications of changing one’s past, makes it a compelling watch for movie enthusiasts.Throughout this article, we have delved into 40 fascinating facts about “The Butterfly Effect,” ranging from the film’s origin and development to its impact on popular culture. From its alternative endings to its profound exploration of the butterfly effect theory, there is no shortage of intriguing information about this cinematic gem.Whether you are a longtime fan of the film or a newcomer curious to learn more, these facts have hopefully deepened your appreciation for “The Butterfly Effect” and shed light on the behind-the-scenes aspects that made it such a memorable piece of cinema.

1. Who directed “The Butterfly Effect”? “The Butterfly Effect” was directed by Eric Bress and J. Mackye Gruber.

2. When was “The Butterfly Effect” released? The movie was released on January 23, 2004, in the United States.

3. Who are the main actors in the film? The main actors in “The Butterfly Effect” are Ashton Kutcher, Amy Smart , and Melora Walters.

4. Is “The Butterfly Effect” based on a book? No, “The Butterfly Effect” is an original screenplay written by Eric Bress and J. Mackye Gruber.

5. What is the butterfly effect theory? The butterfly effect theory suggests that small changes can have significant effects on complex systems, like time and events.

6. Are there alternate endings to the movie? Yes, there are alternate endings to “The Butterfly Effect” that provide different outcomes for the story.

7. Has “The Butterfly Effect” been influential in popular culture? Yes, “The Butterfly Effect” has had a significant impact on popular culture, with references and adaptations in various forms of media.

8. Is “The Butterfly Effect” suitable for all audiences? No, “The Butterfly Effect” is rated R for its intense scenes and mature themes. Viewer discretion is advised.

9. Did “The Butterfly Effect” receive any awards? While the film did not earn major awards, it garnered praise for its performances and unique storytelling approach.

10. Where can I watch “The Butterfly Effect”? “The Butterfly Effect” is available for streaming on various online platforms or can be purchased on DVD or Blu-ray.

Was this page helpful?

Our commitment to delivering trustworthy and engaging content is at the heart of what we do. Each fact on our site is contributed by real users like you, bringing a wealth of diverse insights and information. To ensure the highest standards of accuracy and reliability, our dedicated editors meticulously review each submission. This process guarantees that the facts we share are not only fascinating but also credible. Trust in our commitment to quality and authenticity as you explore and learn with us.

Share this Fact:

Time-travel movies

The Butterfly Effect (2004)

Plot synopsis

Evan is a young boy, who suffers from memory blackouts when experiencing traumatic events. His therapist asks him to keep a diary of these moments, so he can remember what happens.

When he is a young adult, he starts to read one of his old diaries and falls into a trance. He then begins to re-experience the event in his diary but with his adult point of view. He is able to change the past for the better.

When he comes out of the trance, this small but significant change in his past has had major consequences in his present!

Evan’s father, who had the same ability and ended up in a mental home, tries to warn Evan. He says that the more attempts that he makes to fix the mistakes of the past, the more problems he will create in the present. It seems this genetic defect is passed down from father to son.

At the end of the film, to prevent himself from also going mad, he goes back to the womb and strangles himself with the cord, before he can be born.

His mother had had two stillbirths before him, so presumably these sons had gone back and also committed suicide in the same way.

The story ends with the lives of his childhood friends, Lenny, Kayleigh and Tommy turning out much better without him being born; his mother even gives birth to a baby, who cannot have the genetic defect because she is a girl.

My comments

The original cinema release of this film had a different ending: Evan goes back to the point when he and Kayleigh first met as children. He threatens to harm her and her family if she ever talks to him again, which causes the timeline to diverge.

This means Kayleigh and her brother, Tommy, don’t have to grow up living with their evil father, and that their friend, Lenny, grows up without being bullied. They all go on to live happy well-adjusted lives.

The film ends when eight years later, Kayleigh and Evan pass on a street with a feeling of déjà vu but keep walking.

Rutgers biophysicist Troy Shinbrot says, “If [Evan] had a better model for the system that is his life, perhaps he could have chosen better outcomes. But then the movie wouldn’t be very interesting.” [1]

Successfully changing the past but making things worse in the future is also the theme of the film, Retroactive (1997).

Summary of time travel

When Evan travels back, he easily makes changes, so the past is open. When he returns to his present, the timeline has strongly diverged. This would suggest an open past, open future model of time with a diverging timeline.

However, on one occasion, he went back in time, made some changes, but on his return, nothing had changed, so it seems a double-well timeline was being used in this film.

Category of time travel

Psychological: psychosis.

Model of time

Open past, open future with a double-well timeline.

[1] Chodos, A. (2004). Butterflies, Tornadoes, and Time Travel. Retrieved 12 Apr 2009, from http://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200406/butterfly-effect.cfm

Copy from this list
Report this list

The Butterfly Effect Movies

A small change in one state can cause big differences in a later state. This theory is called the Butterfly Effect, named after the metaphor that a butterfly flapping its wings can determine the path of a tornado. Which of these movies using the butterfly effect do you like the most? Discuss the poll here Minimum of 1,000 ratings.

Movies or TV
IMDb Rating
In Theaters
Release Year

1. Back to the Future (1985)

PG | 116 min | Adventure, Comedy, Sci-Fi

Marty McFly, a 17-year-old high school student, is accidentally sent 30 years into the past in a time-traveling DeLorean invented by his close friend, the maverick scientist Doc Brown.

Director: Robert Zemeckis | Stars: Michael J. Fox , Christopher Lloyd , Lea Thompson , Crispin Glover

Votes: 1,307,422 | Gross: $210.61M

Including: Back to the Future Part II Back to the Future Part III

2. Donnie Darko (2001)

R | 113 min | Drama, Mystery, Sci-Fi

After narrowly escaping a bizarre accident, a troubled teenager is plagued by visions of a man in a large rabbit suit who manipulates him to commit a series of crimes.

Director: Richard Kelly | Stars: Jake Gyllenhaal , Jena Malone , Mary McDonnell , Holmes Osborne

Votes: 850,332 | Gross: $1.48M

3. Looper (2012)

R | 119 min | Action, Drama, Sci-Fi

In 2074, when the mob wants to get rid of someone, the target is sent into the past, where a hired gun awaits - someone like Joe - who one day learns the mob wants to 'close the loop' by sending back Joe's future self for assassination.

Director: Rian Johnson | Stars: Joseph Gordon-Levitt , Bruce Willis , Emily Blunt , Paul Dano

Votes: 603,100 | Gross: $66.49M

4. The Butterfly Effect (2004)

R | 113 min | Drama, Sci-Fi, Thriller

Evan Treborn suffers blackouts during significant events of his life. As he grows up, he finds a way to remember these lost memories and a supernatural way to alter his life by reading his journal.

Directors: Eric Bress , J. Mackye Gruber | Stars: Ashton Kutcher , Amy Smart , Melora Walters , Elden Henson

Votes: 521,334 | Gross: $57.94M

5. About Time (I) (2013)

R | 123 min | Comedy, Drama, Fantasy

At the age of 21, Tim discovers he can travel in time and change what happens and has happened in his own life. His decision to make his world a better place by getting a girlfriend turns out not to be as easy as you might think.

Director: Richard Curtis | Stars: Domhnall Gleeson , Rachel McAdams , Bill Nighy , Lydia Wilson

Votes: 386,050 | Gross: $15.32M

6. Run Lola Run (1998)

R | 80 min | Action, Crime, Thriller

After a botched money delivery, Lola has 20 minutes to come up with 100,000 Deutschmarks.

Director: Tom Tykwer | Stars: Franka Potente , Moritz Bleibtreu , Herbert Knaup , Nina Petri

Votes: 207,039 | Gross: $7.27M

7. Mr. Nobody (2009)

R | 141 min | Drama, Fantasy, Romance

A boy stands on a station platform as a train is about to leave. Should he go with his mother or stay with his father? Infinite possibilities arise from this decision. As long as he doesn't choose, anything is possible.

Director: Jaco Van Dormael | Stars: Jared Leto , Sarah Polley , Diane Kruger , Linh-Dan Pham

Votes: 245,887 | Gross: $0.00M

8. Miss Peregrine's Home for Peculiar Children (2016)

PG-13 | 127 min | Adventure, Drama, Family

When Jacob (Asa Butterfield) discovers clues to a mystery that stretches across time, he finds Miss Peregrine's Home for Peculiar Children. But the danger deepens after he gets to know the residents and learns about their special powers.

Director: Tim Burton | Stars: Eva Green , Asa Butterfield , Samuel L. Jackson , Judi Dench

Votes: 188,651 | Gross: $87.24M

9. The Jacket (2005)

R | 103 min | Drama, Fantasy, Mystery

A Gulf war veteran is wrongly sent to a mental institution for insane criminals, where he becomes the object of a doctor's experiments, and his life is completely affected by them.

Director: John Maybury | Stars: Adrien Brody , Keira Knightley , Daniel Craig , Kris Kristofferson

Votes: 119,309 | Gross: $6.30M

10. Frequency (2000)

PG-13 | 118 min | Crime, Drama, Mystery

An accidental cross-time radio link connects father and son across 30 years. The son tries to save his father's life, but then must fix the consequences.

Director: Gregory Hoblit | Stars: Dennis Quaid , Jim Caviezel , Shawn Doyle , Elizabeth Mitchell

Votes: 115,781 | Gross: $45.01M

11. Project Almanac (2015)

PG-13 | 106 min | Drama, Mystery, Sci-Fi

A group of teens discovers secret plans for a time machine, and construct one. However, things start to get out of control.

Director: Dean Israelite | Stars: Amy Landecker , Sofia Black-D'Elia , Virginia Gardner , Jonny Weston

Votes: 84,259 | Gross: $22.35M

12. Sliding Doors (1998)

PG-13 | 99 min | Comedy, Drama, Fantasy

After personal and professional setbacks, a woman experiences an alternate reality.

Director: Peter Howitt | Stars: Gwyneth Paltrow , John Hannah , John Lynch , Jeanne Tripplehorn

Votes: 71,509 | Gross: $11.88M

13. Mirage (2018)

TV-MA | 128 min | Drama, Fantasy, Mystery

Two storms separated by 25 years. A woman murdered. A daughter missed. Only 72 hours to discover the truth.

Director: Oriol Paulo | Stars: Adriana Ugarte , Chino Darín , Javier Gutiérrez , Álvaro Morte

Votes: 64,268

14. Chaos Theory (II) (2007)

PG-13 | 87 min | Comedy, Drama, Romance

The story of an obsessively organized efficiency expert whose life unravels in unexpected ways when fate forces him to explore the serendipitous nature of love and forgiveness.

Director: Marcos Siega | Stars: Ryan Reynolds , Emily Mortimer , Stuart Townsend , Sarah Chalke

Votes: 33,537 | Gross: $0.24M

15. Enter Nowhere (2011)

R | 90 min | Mystery, Sci-Fi, Thriller

Three strangers arrive one by one at a mysterious cabin in the middle of nowhere only to learn they've been brought together for a reason.

Director: Jack Heller | Stars: Katherine Waterston , Scott Eastwood , Sara Paxton , Shaun Sipos

Votes: 12,644

16. Blind Chance (1987)

Not Rated | 114 min | Drama, Romance

Witek runs after a train. Three variations follow on how such a seemingly banal incident could influence the rest of Witek's life.

Director: Krzysztof Kieslowski | Stars: Boguslaw Linda , Tadeusz Lomnicki , Zbigniew Zapasiewicz , Boguslawa Pawelec

Votes: 11,207

17. Frozen Land (2005)

130 min | Drama

One bad event begins a chain reaction of misery as problems transfer from one person to another. It starts when a schoolteacher is fired and projects his issues onto his teenage son.

Director: Aku Louhimies | Stars: Jasper Pääkkönen , Mikko Leppilampi , Pamela Tola , Petteri Summanen

Votes: 6,344

18. Happenstance (2000)

R | 90 min | Comedy, Drama, Romance

How, thanks to what's known as the "Butterfly theory" (a random series of unlinked events), can a young woman and a young man meet ?

Director: Laurent Firode | Stars: Audrey Tautou , Faudel , Eric Savin , Nathalie Besançon

Votes: 3,949 | Gross: $0.13M

19. Me Myself I (1999)

R | 104 min | Comedy, Romance

Pamela Drury is unhappy and alone. On her birthday she stumbles across a photo of Robert Dickson and wonders what would've happened had she said yes to his proposal. A freak accident causes... See full summary »

Director: Pip Karmel | Stars: Rachel Griffiths , David Roberts , Sandy Winton , Yael Stone

Votes: 2,669 | Gross: $0.57M

20. The Tesseract (2003)

R | 96 min | Action, Crime, Drama

A psychologist, an Englishman, a bellboy and a wounded female assassin have their fates crossed at a sleazy Bangkok hotel.

Director: Oxide Chun Pang | Stars: Jonathan Rhys Meyers , Saskia Reeves , Alexander Rendell , Carlo Nanni

Votes: 1,330

List Activity

Tell your friends, other lists by brijeshmarand.

Screen Rant

Butterfly effect time travel rule-breaking scene is still bothering fans.

Many years after its release, one scene in The Butterfly Effect which breaks the movie's own time travel rules is still bothering fans to this day.

One scene in The Butterfly Effect is still bothering fans to this day. Released in 2004, the sci-fi thriller stars Ashton Kutcher as Evan Treborn who, as a child, has a history of blackouts and memory loss. Later, as a 20-year-old college student, Evan discovers that by reading his childhood journals, he can transport himself back in time to inhabit his former self during those blackouts. Kutcher's character decides to use his ability to correct the past, soon discovering that even the slightest change comes with major unintended consequences. However, the film doesn't always follow its own time travel rules.

A recent Reddit thread posted by u/KillerQ97 posed the question, " Which continuity error or plot hole in a movie always sticks out in your mind? " and u/BionicTriforce replied with the infamous prison scene from The Butterfly Effect , the comment reaching the top of the thread. A string of users sharing his sentiment replied to the comment, demonstrating how, nearly twenty years after its release, this illogical scene from The Butterfly Effect is still bothering fans. Check out the thread below:

Related: The Adam Project's Time Travel Rules & Real Science Explained

The Butterfly Effect's Time Travel Rules Explained

Early on in The Butterfly Effect , the film establishes its titular principle – every time Evan travels back in time and makes changes to the past, it results in various unintended consequences. When he returns to the present, Evan effectively creates a new timeline, and he's the only person aware of the changes. Using the same example as the Reddit user, when Evan's arms are blown off by an explosion, he wakes up in a new reality and is shocked to find he has no arms, which his roommates are already aware of.

At another point, Evan accidentally kills Kayleigh's unhinged brother Tommy and goes to prison for the crime. There, to try and convince a fellow prisoner he possesses the power of time travel, Ashton Kutcher's character travels back to his childhood and violently stabs his hands on some pointed objects in school, only to end up right back in prison in the present, with some scars magically appearing on his hands. The puzzling scene defies the very logic of the film's title and all the time travel rules it establishes.

Following the time travel rules presented by the film, Evan's actions should have resulted in the creation of an alternate timeline in which his scars were there the whole time with Evan being aware he didn't have them before. Using The Butterfly Effect 's own logic, Evan stabbing his own hands in school would have caused ripple effects that drastically altered the trajectory of his life, meaning he never would have killed Tommy and ended up in prison. This scene in The Butterfly Effect is the only one that defies its own time travel rules, though it's been driving viewers crazy for years.

More: The Butterfly Effect 3 Is (Shockingly) The Franchise's Best

Source: Various (see links above)

The Butterfly Effect (2004) Movie Ending Explained: What Are Two Different Conclusions to The Branched Effect?

“The Butterfly Effect” taps into the chaos theory, illustrating how seemingly insignificant actions can lead to major consequences. The protagonist, Evan, possesses the ability to alter events by traveling back in time. Throughout the film, Evan’s attempts to change the course of his life often result in unintended and detrimental outcomes for himself and those around him. However, after numerous trials and errors, he eventually learns how to rectify the damage caused by his actions. In the climactic moments of the movie, Evan successfully manages to undo the harm he has inflicted upon his loved ones, demonstrating the central theme of the Butterfly Effect and the power of cause and effect.

The Butterfly Effect (2004) Film Summary & Plot Synopsis

“The Butterfly Effect” is a sci-fi thriller featuring Ashton Kutcher, John Patrick Amedori, Logan Lerman, Irina Gorovaia, Amy Smart, Eldon Henson, Jesse James, and Melora Walters. The movie begins with a patient hiding under a table and writing a note, saying that if someone finds it, it means Evan has failed to save her life. Evan also signs the paper.

The scene then shifts to Evan’s childhood, where he asks his mother about his absent father. She avoids the topic and drops him off at school. At school, Evan’s teacher shows his mother a violent drawing he made, but Evan has no memory of it. It becomes evident that Evan suffers from amnesia and experiences blackouts of certain memories.

Why Did Even Leave Town?

When Evan was diagnosed by a doctor, the doctor suggested tracking his memories by journaling. As he began writing in his journal, he made some friends: Kayleigh Miller, Tommy Miller (Kayleigh’s brother), and Lenny Kagan. The movie shifts a few years forward. One day, while they are smoking in the Millers’ basement, Tommy finds dynamite.

High On Films in collaboration with Avanté

They decide to play a prank and plant the dynamite in a neighbor’s letterbox. However, when the dynamite explodes, Evan blacked out. When he came to, Lenny was in shock, and medics were attending to him. Evan claims not to remember anything and to make everything seem fine. Tommy suggests going to the movies, but at the theater, Tommy sees Evan and Kayleigh kissing, which angers him.

He gets into a fight with some bullies and vandalizes the theater. After Tommy is arrested, Evan and Kayleigh go to see Lenny. While talking, they heard rustling in the woods. Investigating, they found that Lenny was about to harm Crockett, Evan’s dog. Tommy hits Kayleigh with a log of wood and also attacks Evan. When they regain consciousness, they find that Tommy has burned Crockett to death. The next day, Andrea decides to move to another city with her son to get him away from these troubles. Before leaving, Evan sends a note to Kayleigh, promising to come back for her.

How Does Evan Travel Back in Time?

The movie then jumps seven years ahead, showing Evan taking an exam at college. His professors are impressed with his performance. When he returns to his dorm room, he tells his roommate that it has been seven years without any blackouts. He also decides to revisit one of his journals. Evan is sitting in his room with his girlfriend when she notices his journals and asks him to read one of his memories. As he reads, he time-travels to the day when Tommy killed his dog. He notices Kayleigh lying unconscious and Lenny desperately trying to untie the bag. However, Lenny stops when Tommy threatens to harm Lenny’s mom. Evan returns to the present just as Tommy sets fire to the bag containing Crockett.

Upon waking up, Evan’s girlfriend tries to convince him it was a dream, but Evan finds it too real. He decides to visit Lenny the next day to ask about what happened that day. During their conversation, Lenny repeats the threat Tommy made, confirming what Evan saw after reading his journal. Evan then returns to his dorm and revisits the day they blew up the mailbox with dynamite. Suddenly transported back to that moment, Evan accidentally burns his T-shirt with a cigarette, leaving a scar on his stomach. In the memory, he sees the owner of the house walking towards the mailbox with her baby, and the dynamite explodes on them. Witnessing this, Lenny freezes while the others flee. Upon waking up, Evan notices the same cigarette burn on his stomach.

How did Evan use the butterfly effect to save Kayleigh?

Later that evening, Evan goes out with his mom and asks about his dad, Jason. Andrea tells him that Jason got great grades without even touching his books. Evan then asks his mom if his dad ever found a way to regain his lost memories. Andrea reveals that Jason, around Evan’s age, had found a way to retrieve his memories. She begins to mention another of Jason’s abilities but stops abruptly. To change the subject, Andrea suggests they try palm reading for fun. However, during the reading, the psychic says Evan has no soul or lifeline and was never meant to exist.

To this, Andrea shares with Evan that he was her miracle baby after two miscarriages. Back in his dorm, Evan reads a memory involving Mr. Miller filming him and Kayleigh. His roommate, Thumper, intervenes and warns Evan that he repressed these memories for a reason. Evan decides to revisit his hometown to see Kayleigh and ask her about the day of the filming. However, Kayleigh becomes upset with him for bringing up the past and questions why he didn’t keep in touch if she meant so much to him.

The Butterfly Effect (2004) Movie Ending Explained

When Evan returns to his dorm, he receives a voicemail from Tommy informing him that Kayleigh has taken her own life. He attends Kayleigh’s funeral from afar and leaves flowers and his note on her grave before returning to his dorm. Distraught, Evan decides to test his theory of altering the past by focusing on the day of the filming. As he recites phrases from that day, Evan finds himself transported back to that moment. When Mr. Miller instructs Kayleigh and Evan to undress for the scene, Evan intervenes and asks Kayleigh to cover her ears.

He then confronts Mr. Miller, warning him that his actions will lead to Kayleigh’s death, and threatens to harm him if he doesn’t stop. As a byproduct, Evan wakes up in a girl’s dorm room next to Kayleigh, both now 20 years old. They share a flash of memories together before walking to class. Evan notices a change in his surroundings: he’s now friends with the fraternity boys who previously bullied his roommate, Thumper, who seems to dislike Evan in this reality.

Why is Evan Sent to Prison?

Evan arranges a romantic dinner for Kayleigh, but their evening is disrupted when they discover someone has vandalized his car. They find a dog collar inside, indicating it’s Tommy’s doing. Kayleigh reassures him that Tommy won’t cause any real harm. But as they walk back to her dorm, Tommy ambushes Evan and attacks him with a bat. Evan defends himself with pepper spray and ultimately strikes Tommy, resulting in his death.

As a result, Evan is sent to prison, where he seeks protection from his cellmate, Carlos. However, Carlos advises him to relocate to avoid abuse. During a visit from Andrea, she gives Evan two of his journals, as the others are in storage. Later, other inmates seize Evan’s journals, but he tears out a few pages to demonstrate his abilities to Carlos.

Did Evan manage to fix his life with the Butterfly effect?

Evan starts recalling memories and reaches the day he drew the disturbing drawing. He sticks both his hands on paper holders and needles to give himself a scar. When he wakes up, Carlos believes him and decides to help. With Carlos’ help, Evan manages to go back to the moment when Tommy is about to burn his dog. He gives Lenny a sharp shard to cut the bag with Crockett to release him. They try to convince Tommy to let the dog go, but Lenny stabs Tommy in the back.

Evan wakes up in his dorm room again, and all the memories start to flash in his mind, making him unconscious. While in the hospital, Evan steals security keys from the doctor and goes to see Lenny. When Evan tries to talk to Lenny, he just stares at the ceiling, but when Evan is about to leave, he asks him if he knows what would happen if he handed the shard to Lenny. Evan replies with a yes, and Lenny tells him that he deserves to be in his place.

Evan revisits the day he met his father. He asks him a way to make things right, but his father tells him it is impossible without destroying a part of himself. He then tells his father that he will try using his powers to make things right, which makes his father lunge at him. After waking up, he decides to visit Kayleigh in his hometown. He asks about her at the diner but realizes she never worked there. He then visits her house and takes her to dinner, but she refuses to believe in his abilities.

Evan returns to his dorm and starts recalling the memory from the day they blew up the mailbox. He warns the mother and daughter to stay away from the mailbox, but Tommy shields them and becomes a hero while Evan gets blown away by the explosion. As he wakes up in his bed, Evan realizes that he lost both his limbs in the blast, and many memories start to flood his mind. Among these memories, he sees that Lenny and Kayleigh are in a relationship.

When Evan and Kayleigh get a chance to spend some time alone, Evan asks her if they could have had a good relationship. Kayleigh replies that Evan was the only reason she stayed with her dad instead of her mom. Evan tells her that nobody could love her like he does. Feeling depressed, Evan attempts suicide, but Tommy intervenes and takes him to the hospital to see Andrea, who is suffering from lung cancer. Evan decides to go back in time to destroy the dynamite, but he fails the first time.

On his second attempt, he reaches the memory of when Mr. Miller tried to shoot a movie. He finds the dynamite near the fireplace and lights it, but Mr. Miller knocks it out of his hand, and Kayleigh picks it up, resulting in her death. Evan then wakes up in a psychiatric ward and is determined to try again. He goes to the doctor’s office to ask for his journals, but the doctor says there are none. At night, Evan sneaks into the doctor’s office and starts writing a goodbye note. A video starts playing on the projector. From here, there are two climaxes: the theatrical climax and the director’s cut climax.

The Butterfly Effect (2004) Movie Ending Explained:

What are two different conclusions to the branched effect.

In the director’s cut, Evan watches the video of his mother giving birth to him and reaches inside the womb. He then strangles himself with his umbilical cord, and Andrea feels a shooting pain. Later, a range of memories flash before him as his friends and family achieve a happy life in his absence. Whereas, in the theatrical climax, when Evan is in the office, a video of him meeting Kayleigh for the first time plays on the screen. He revisits that memory, and when Kayleigh tries to befriend him, he threatens her, causing them to never become friends. As Evan wakes up in his dorm room, his nose starts bleeding as all the memories flood back into his head. In these memories, Kayleigh and Tommy have chosen to live with their mother and have become very successful.

Evan immediately asks Lenny, his former roommate, about Kayleigh, but Lenny responds, “Who’s Kayleigh?” Together, Lenny and Evan decide to burn all the memories and journals from their past. The movie then shifts to eight years later when Evan is seen walking out of a building. He crosses paths with Kayleigh, and she briefly looks at him as if recognizing him but then walks past him.

The Butterfly Effect (2004) Movie Links: IMDb , Rotten Tomatoes , Wikipedia , Letterboxd The Butterfly Effect (2004) Movie Cast: Ashton Kutcher, Amy Smart, Eric Stoltz, William Lee Scott, Elden Henson, Logan Lerman. Ethan Suplee, Melora Walters The Butterfly Effect (2004) Movie Genre: Mystery & thriller, Runtime: 1h 53m

Where to watch the butterfly effect, trending right now.

Behind Your Touch (Season 1), Episode 1: Recap & Ending, Explained – Unveiling Psychic Powers – A Perverted Mess or a Hidden Gift?

Sex Education (Season 4), Episode 2: Recap & Ending Explained – Why does Otis Call Ruby for help?

John Wick: Chapter 4 Shoots to the Top as Franchise’s Best-Rated Film on Rotten Tomatoes & Metacritic

The Infernal Machine (2022): Movie Review & Ending Explained – Who is DuKent and what does he want from Cogburn?

Stranger Than Paradise [1984] – A Charmingly Low-Key Classic of American Indie Cinema

Here’s Where To Watch And Stream Fernando Guzzoni’s Latest Drama Chilean Oscar Entry Blanquita Online

Physics Magazine
Physical Review Journals
Physics Today
Other APS Publications
March Meeting
April Meeting
Meeting Calendar
Abstract Submission
Meeting Archive
Policies & Guidelines
International Affairs
Public Engagement
Women in Physics
Minorities in Physics
LGBT Physicists
Industrial Physics
Renew Membership
Member Directory
My Member Profile
Member Services
APS Chapters
Action Center
Reports & Studies
APS Statements
Contact APS Government Affairs
Physics Jobs
Becoming a Physicist
Career Guidance
Tools for Career Advisors
Statistical Data
News & Announcements
Press Releases
Social Media
Mission, Vision, Values
Strategic Plan
Society Governance
Society History
Donate to APS
Become a Member

June 2004 (Volume 13, Number 6)

Butterflies, tornadoes, and time travel.

The term "butterfly effect" was coined by meteorologist Edward Lorenz, who discovered in the 1960's that tiny, butterfly—scale changes to the starting point of his computer weather models resulted in anything from sunny skies to violent storms—with no way to predict in advance what the outcome might be.

In the movie The Butterfly Effect , actor Ashton Kutchner plays a man who has found a way to travel back in time to his youth. Each time he returns to his childhood, he makes minuscule changes that radically alter his life in the present, inevitably leading to (you guessed it) terrifying results.

Human time travel is a purely fictional concept, but according to Rutgers biophysicist Troy Shinbrot, the idea that small changes can lead to dramatically different outcomes is firmly rooted in the physics of chaos theory, at least for some systems.

"If you're willing to suspend your disbelief long enough to accept the possibility of time travel," says Shinbrot, "then, yes, the movie sounds like it has a reasonably plausible premise, from a physics point of view."

Shinbrot should know—his PhD dissertation at the University of Maryland was based on groundbreaking butterfly effect experiments.

Scriptwriters, it seems, have found that the butterfly effect is a useful tool for establishing dramatic tension.

For scientists like Shinbrot, it can be a useful tool for manipulating chaotic systems. In fact, Shinbrot's dissertation was part of an effort to learn how to make small adjustments to a chaotic system to choose the system's outcome.

"NASA currently directs trajectories of spacecraft using the butterfly effect," says Shinbrot. "The first example that I know of was the International Cometary Explorer. They used the fact that the butterfly effect applies to trajectories in the solar system. With tiny amounts of hydrazine fuel, they created little puffs that steered the spacecraft halfway across the solar system to meet up with comet Giacobini-Zinner That's how they achieved the first ever scientific cometary encounter."

In order to make use of the butterfly effect, NASA scientists must study highly accurate models of satellites in the solar system.

As for the adventures Kutchner faces in The Butterfly Effect , says Shinbrot, "If he had a better model for the system that is his life, perhaps he could have chosen better outcomes. But then the movie wouldn't be very interesting."

— Adapted from Physicscentral.com

©1995 - 2024, AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY APS encourages the redistribution of the materials included in this newspaper provided that attribution to the source is noted and the materials are not truncated or changed.

APS News Home

Issue Table of Contents

APS News Archives

Contact APS News Editor

Become an APS Member Submit a Meeting Abstract Submit a Manuscript Find a Journal Article Donate to APS

Renew Membership Join an APS Unit Update Contact Information

Information for

Librarians Authors Referees Media Students

The American Physical Society (APS) is a nonprofit membership organization working to advance the knowledge of physics.

The real butterfly effect

Lorenz, in focus, singular limits, indeterministic results, weather forecasting with artificial intelligence, the real butterfly effect and maggoty apples.

Open the PDF for in another window
Reprints and Permissions
Cite Icon Cite
Search Site

Tim Palmer; The real butterfly effect and maggoty apples. Physics Today 1 May 2024; 77 (5): 30–35. https://doi.org/10.1063/pt.eike.hsbz

Download citation file:

Ris (Zotero)
Reference Manager

We think we know why the weather can be so difficult to predict. It’s the so-called butterfly effect: The flap of a butterfly’s wings in Brazil can set off a tornado in Texas a week later. But because we can’t observe all the butterflies in Brazil, we can’t reliably predict tornadoes in Texas a week in advance.

SOLARSEVEN/SHUTTERSTOCK.COM

As described in James Gleick’s masterful 1987 exposition of chaos theory, 1 the discovery of the butterfly effect is generally attributed to MIT meteorologist Edward Lorenz. In 1963 he famously constructed a model of chaos based on three deterministic coupled nonlinear differential equations. 2 Being chaotic, the evolution of the state of that system is extremely sensitive to the specification of the initial conditions. Therefore, Lorenz’s three-component model describes both the butterfly effect and the unpredictability of the weather.

At least, that’s the folklore. But it isn’t quite correct. The butterfly effect was first described by Lorenz in his talk at the 1972 meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. 3 The title was indeed “Predictability: Does the Flap of a Butterfly’s Wings in Brazil Set Off a Tornado in Texas?” In the talk, Lorenz noted that errors in forecasting the position and intensity of low-pressure cyclonic weather systems tend to double every three days or so. Errors in the individual clouds that are embedded in those weather systems, however, tend to double on shorter time scales. And errors in individual eddies in the subcloud turbulence double on time scales shorter still.

The nonlinear Navier–Stokes equations of fluid mechanics couple the subcloud, cloud, and cyclone scales together. Hence, Lorenz noted, even if you could perfectly observe the atmosphere on the 1000 km scale of the low-pressure system, you would still not be able to predict the structure and intensity of the weather system indefinitely into the future. Initial uncertainties on kilometer or smaller length scales would eventually limit your ability to predict the larger cyclone. The question Lorenz posed was this: How long does it take for uncertainties in the initial conditions on subcloud scales to affect a forecaster’s ability to predict position and intensity on the much larger cyclonic scales? (See figure 1 .)

A low-pressure cyclone system contains many individual clouds. Each individual cloud is a turbulent system comprising many small eddies. The real butterfly effect illustrates how uncertainties in the starting conditions for any of those whirls affect our ability to predict the cyclonic system itself. (Courtesy of Jacques Descloitres, MODIS Rapid Response Team, NASA/GSFC.)

Lorenz’s 1963 paper cannot address that question—and hence the notion of the butterfly effect as Lorenz intended it to mean in his 1972 talk—because the 1963 model equations do not describe how fluid flows at different spatial scales interact. In fact, in his 1972 talk, Lorenz was informally discussing results from a highly technical paper he had published in 1969 in the Swedish journal Tellus . The abstract of the paper, titled “The predictability of a flow which possesses many scales of motion,” begins as follows:

It is proposed that certain formally deterministic fluid systems which possess many scales of motion are observationally indistinguishable from indeterministic systems; specifically, that two states of the system differing initially by a small “observational error” will evolve into two states differing as greatly as randomly chosen states of the system within a finite time interval, which cannot be lengthened by reducing the amplitude of the initial error. 4

The last clause of the sentence is worth reading a couple of times, because it is so surprising. Lorenz is describing chaotic unpredictability in the extreme. That type of unpredictability is much greater than that in his 1963 model of chaos. In the early model, you can predict as far ahead as you like by making the initial error sufficiently small. From a mathematical standpoint, Lorenz’s 1963 model has the property that the evolved state depends continuously on the initial state. As the initial state tends to the true state, so, too, does the forecast state.

On the basis of the Navier–Stokes partial differential equations, Lorenz’s 1969 paper describes systems that do not plausibly have that continuity property. Indeed, the limit of vanishing initial error, which I’ll discuss in more detail below, is what’s known as a singular limit.

To better appreciate what Lorenz proposed in his 1969 paper, suppose that we can observe the initial state of the atmosphere perfectly, with no errors or gaps. That does not mean that we can forecast perfectly, because to make a forecast of the weather, you must assimilate observations into a computational weather model, thus creating a set of initial conditions for the model.

The weather model approximates the Navier–Stokes and other relevant atmospheric equations using a finite, 3D array of so-called gridboxes. Collectively, the gridboxes cover the whole atmosphere and oceans. (Some models use finite sets of orthogonal functions, such as spherical harmonics, but that doesn’t change the argument.) Inside a gridbox, the weather model erroneously assumes that the atmosphere is completely homogeneous. The horizontal size of each gridbox in the very best global weather-forecast models is currently around 10 km.

Next, let’s suppose that we can make accurate weather forecasts of low-pressure systems on average up to seven days ahead with our weather model. In the idealized case of perfect observations, the source of error that limits the forecast’s accuracy lies in the gridbox-homogeneity assumption. Hence, it is reasonable to ask (our employers) for a bigger computer that would allow the weather equations to be integrated with a gridbox half the size. The incorrect homogeneity assumption would then be restricted to scales smaller than before by a factor of two.

Would that factor of two double the range of forecast accuracy from 7 days to 14 days? In his 1969 paper, Lorenz argues that it does not. The errors associated with small scales that were unresolved in the old model but are subsequently resolved in the new one would grow faster than errors in the smallest scales resolved in the old model. For example, if the error-doubling time of the newly resolved scales was half the error-doubling time of the previously resolved scales—meaning that the errors grow twice as fast—the predictability time with the new weather model will only increase by a factor of (1 + ½), which is significantly less than a factor of two.

Indeed, if later still we could afford a computer that would allow a further halving of the size of the gridboxes, the predictability time would only be increased from (1 + ½) × 7 days to (1 + ½ + ¼) × 7 days. If you carried on like that—halving the gridbox an infinite number of times—the predictability time would not be infinite. Rather, it would be (1 + ½ + ¼ + ⅛ + 1/16 …) × 7, or 14 days. With infinitesimally small gridboxes, forecasters would have increased the predictability time of the original model by only a factor of two. (The existence of that finite limit is consistent with the Kolmogorov energy spectrum for 3D fluid turbulence.)

But that sounds contradictory. After an infinite number of gridbox halvings, the (now infinitely powerful) computer represents the Navier–Stokes equations precisely. And because those equations are completely deterministic, we should be able to forecast infinitely far ahead.

To understand what accounts for the short forecast range, imagine having a bucket of apples that contain maggots. If you bite into an apple and discover half a maggot, then you have eaten half a maggot—an unpleasant experience. However, if you bite into an apple and discover a quarter of a maggot, then that’s even worse because you have eaten three-quarters of a maggot. More generally, if you bite into an apple and discover 1/ n of a maggot, you have eaten 1 − 1/ n of a maggot.

The larger the value of n , the greater the fraction of the maggot you have eaten, and the more unpleasant the experience. You might therefore imagine that the limit n = ∞ of a sequence of such apple bitings describes the most unpleasant experience. But it doesn’t. If you bite into an apple and discover no maggot, you may not have eaten a maggot at all! (A tiny maggot fraction is qualitatively different from no maggot.)

That example, first described by theoretical physicist Michael Berry, is known as a singular limit (see his Reference Frame, Physics Today , May 2002, page 10 ). Such limits abound in physics. For example, blackbody radiators never experience a UV catastrophe—the prediction that the intensity of their emitted radiation goes to infinity as wavelength decreases—provided that Planck’s constant h remains nonzero (no matter how small it is). Set h precisely to zero, however, and the classical Rayleigh–Jeans spectrum diverges.

In another example, as long as a fluid’s viscosity remains nonzero, it is able to generate aerodynamic lift across an airfoil, no matter how small the viscosity may be. If viscosity is set to zero, however, the boundary condition across the airfoil qualitatively changes. The lifting force of a 3D body in incompressible, inviscid, irrotational flow is zero, a phenomenon known as d’Alembert’s paradox.

There is also a singular limit at the heart of what I call the real butterfly effect. 5 No matter how small the initial uncertainty, the butterfly effect limits predictability to a finite time horizon. Only when the initial uncertainty is identically zero can you potentially predict arbitrarily far ahead with the Navier–Stokes equations. That’s an unrealistic limit, of course. Is the singular predictability limit a rigorous mathematical property of the Navier–Stokes equations? No one knows. The problem of whether solutions depend continuously on initial conditions is related to the unsolved Clay Mathematics Institute Millennium Prize Problem concerning the existence of smooth, unique solutions to the Navier–Stokes equations.

That is not to say that Lorenz’s more famous 1963 model of chaos has nothing useful to say about the predictability of weather. I have used the model on many occasions to demonstrate that the predictability of a nonlinear system is not a fixed quantity. It varies from one initial condition to another, as shown in figure 2 . Hence, although the average predictability of day-to-day weather may be around two weeks, it can sometimes be longer and sometimes shorter than that. Meteorologists can estimate such flow-dependent predictability by running ensembles of forecasts—typically 50 are run from almost but not quite identical initial conditions. When the atmosphere is in a predictable state, the ensemble forecast spread will be relatively small. When the atmosphere is in an unpredictable state, the spread will be relatively large.

Predictability in a nonlinear system, such as this Lorenz attractor, is dependent on the initial conditions, whose uncertainties are represented by the size and location of a circular ring. (a) The ring of uncertainty does not grow in time at all. (b) Started from a lower position, the ring distorts into banana and boomerang shapes, making it unclear whether the actual system undergoes a transition from the left-hand lobe to the right-hand one. (c) With the ring initiated almost midway between the lobes, the time evolution of the attractor is now very uncertain, and there is no predictability. (Adopted from ref. 11 .)

Ensemble prediction has transformed weather forecasting over recent years. For example, it determines the probability of precipitation on your weather app. More importantly, it is changing the way in which humanitarian and disaster relief agencies respond to extreme weather events. In the past, the unreliability of deterministic predictions meant that they would typically wait for an extreme event to occur before sending in medicine, food, water, and emergency shelter to stricken regions. Now, on the basis of a cost-benefit analysis, those agencies predetermine a threshold probability for extreme weather. And if the ensemble-based forecast probabilities exceed the threshold, the agencies take what’s known as “anticipatory action,” sending in emergency supplies ahead of the weather event.

The real butterfly effect implies that although the governing partial differential equations are deterministic, any computational representation of the equations will be indeterministic. That’s not, however, the way weather and climate models have traditionally been formulated. The processes in such models that cannot be resolved explicitly—cloud formation, the flow of air over small mountains, and ocean mixing, for example—have been represented by deterministic parameterization formulas that mimic molecular viscosity and diffusion.

The real butterfly effect, however, implies that no consistent way to represent those subgrid processes by deterministic formulas exists. One way to alleviate the problem is to make the parameterization formulas in weather and climate models explicitly stochastic. 6 , 7 The first stochastic-parameterization scheme was introduced into a weather forecast model in 1999. And today, most weather models incorporate some form of stochastic parameterization.

Even so, many climate models—even those contributing to assessment reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change—are still formulated with deterministic closure schemes. Such models are inconsistent with the Navier–Stokes equations’ scaling symmetries, which contributes to their (sometimes substantial) long-term systematic errors. 8 Stochasticity can have unexpected effects in nonlinear models. 9 Figure 3 , for example, shows that adding noise to the Lorenz 1963 equations helps to stabilize the Lorenz-attractor regimes. The stabilizing effect is quite counterintuitive until you realize that the model makes transitions from one regime to the other in small regions of state space. Those transitions can be disrupted (and thus the regimes stabilized) by small amounts of noise.

Adding noise to Edward Lorenz’s 1963 system of equations describing chaos affects its dynamics in a nonintuitive way. The top plot shows a time series of the X variable in the standard (deterministic) Lorenz model. The bottom plot has a much more pronounced structure because noise is present. The noise effectively stabilizes the regimes of the Lorenz attractor, shown in figure 2 . (Adapted from ref. 11 .)

Artificial intelligence (AI) is now being used to make weather forecasts with levels of skill comparable to more traditional physics-based models. For both training and forecasting, those AI-based models still use sets of gridded, global atmospheric states, in which atmospheric observations have been assimilated into a global physics-based model. Can such AI forecast systems simulate the real butterfly effect?

To answer that question, Tobias Selz and George Craig (both at the German Aerospace Center in Oberpfaffenhofen) compared the growth of estimates of forecast uncertainty using AI and physics-based models last year. 10 The estimate of the initial uncertainty was obtained by taking the difference between two randomly chosen members of an ensemble of data assimilations, which are used in ensemble weather forecasting. The members of the ensemble differ only in the precise values of the observations being assimilated into the model—the variations in those precise values being consistent with observational error.

By construction, the initial error for a weather forecast is spread across a range of scales—from weather systems with a horizontal wavelength of thousands of kilometers down to the model’s grid scale of 10 kilometers or so. The theory of data assimilation predicts that if the spacing between atmospheric observations is typically a few tens of kilometers, then observations do well at determining the large-scale initial weather patterns, with little error. On kilometer scales, however, the errors will become almost as large as it is possible for them to be. Small-scale errors in the initial conditions are thus almost saturated, while large-scale errors have plenty of opportunity to grow. Accordingly, errors grow almost immediately at the large scale but not at all at the small scale.

To study the real butterfly effect, Selz and Craig divided the initial-error field by a factor of 1000. Then, the small-scale errors were far from saturated. Because they grow so much faster than the large-scale errors, the errors should be dominated by the small scales. That is precisely what is seen when a physics-based model is used. And Selz and Craig used both a low-resolution and a high-resolution physics-based model to demonstrate it. Figure 4 shows the divergence of pairs of forecasts with small initial differences.

The difference in a measure of atmospheric kinetic energy between pairs of forecasts as a function of forecast time. The solid black and orange lines show results from a physics-based (Icon) and artificial intelligence (Pangu) model, respectively, when the initial difference between the pairs is comparable with the typical uncertainty in the initial conditions. The dashed lines show differences in kinetic energy when the initial difference is reduced by a factor of 1000. The blue and black dashed lines show the difference in a high- and low-resolution physics-based model, respectively. The orange dashed line shows the lack of growth from an AI model with similar reduced initial perturbation. AI-forecast systems don’t capture the physics of the real butterfly effect. (Adapted from ref. 10 .)

The high-resolution model did a much better job at simulating the rapid growth of the small-scale errors, but the low-resolution model was not completely hopeless; the growth was simply less dramatic. By contrast, the AI system completely failed to predict the growth of small-scale errors. That’s perhaps not surprising. In the real world, as I mentioned, the small-scale errors are already saturated at the initial time. The AI system never learns about the real butterfly effect from its training data. The results demonstrate that you must be cautious when applying AI to the weather-forecast problem; it does not contain the physics of the real butterfly effect.

As I discuss in my book The Primacy of Doubt , 11 studying the predictability of weather and climate reveals some deep and important properties of nonlinear systems. They are relevant to many problems in applied and fundamental science—in various fields, including social science and the foundations of quantum physics. In short, taking a rigorous approach to the science of uncertainty can help us improve our ability to both predict and understand our very chaotic world.

Tim Palmer is a Royal Society Research Professor in Climate Physics at the University of Oxford in the UK.

Citing articles via

Online ISSN 1945-0699
Print ISSN 0031-9228
For Researchers
For Librarians
For Advertisers
Our Publishing Partners
Physics Today
Conference Proceedings
Special Topics

pubs.aip.org

Connect with AIP Publishing

This feature is available to subscribers only.

COMMENTS

A Sound of Thunder (2005)
A Sound of Thunder: Directed by Peter Hyams. With Armin Rohde, Heike Makatsch, Jemima Rooper, David Oyelowo. A single mistake in the past, by a time travel company in the future, has devastating and unforeseen consequences.
A Sound of Thunder (film)
A Sound of Thunder is a 2005 American science fiction thriller film directed by Peter Hyams and starring Edward Burns, Catherine McCormack and Ben Kingsley.It is a co-production film between the United Kingdom, the United States, Germany, and the Czech Republic. The film is based on the 1952 short story of the same name by Ray Bradbury.It is about "time tourists" who accidentally interfere too ...
Retrospective: is The Butterfly Effect the most horrifically bleak time
You've never seen a sci-fi or a thriller quite like The Butterfly Effect: a wildly in-your-face time-travel-with-a-twist story about a man who uses his personal journals to traverse the temporal continnum, setting out to right certain wrongs—with decidedly ghastly results.Starring Ashton Kutcher in the lead role as Evan, the diary enthusiast whose written recollections form his equivalent ...
The Butterfly Effect (2004)
The Butterfly Effect: Directed by Eric Bress, J. Mackye Gruber. With Ashton Kutcher, Melora Walters, Amy Smart, Elden Henson. Evan Treborn suffers blackouts during significant events of his life. As he grows up, he finds a way to remember these lost memories and a supernatural way to alter his life by reading his journal.
10 Best Movies about the Butterfly Effect
The Butterfly Effect 2 (2006) In the movie, Nick Larson, played by Eric Lively, stumbles upon a unique power, just like Ashton Kutcher's Treborn. By reading his late girlfriend Julie's journal, Nick can time travel. At first, Nick uses this power to fix things in his life and make his relationships better, but as he messes with the past ...
'The Butterfly Effect' Is Still the Meanest Time Travel Movie Ever Made
The Meanest Time Travel Movie Ever Made, 20 Years Later. If 'The Butterfly Effect' is remembered for anything, it's unrelenting cruelty. The thing is, it was almost even crueler. By Jake ...
20 Years Ago, Ashton Kutcher Made the Darkest Time-Travel ...
The Butterfly Effect may not go down as one of sci-fi's most impactful and intense tragedies of circumstance, but it deserves better than the critical drubbing it received in 2004. Today, free ...
'The Butterfly Effect' 20 Years Later: Exploring the Dark Side of Time
The Butterfly Effect is far from a perfect film, suffering from inconsistent time-travel logic and more than a few groan-worthy plot contrivances, but I think it's still a really great time if ...
The Butterfly Effect
The Butterfly Effect is a 2004 American science fiction thriller film written and directed by Eric Bress and J. Mackye Gruber.It stars Ashton Kutcher, Amy Smart, Eric Stoltz, William Lee Scott, Elden Henson, Logan Lerman, Ethan Suplee, and Melora Walters.The title refers to the butterfly effect.. Kutcher plays 20-year-old college student Evan Treborn, who experiences blackouts and memory loss ...
The Butterfly Effect collection (2004-2009)
The Butterfly Effect 2 (2006) R | 92 min | Drama, Sci-Fi, Thriller. Nick Larson discovers a supernatural way to alter his life and travel back in time to key moments in his life by looking at photographs. Director: John R. Leonetti | Stars: Eric Lively, Erica Durance, Dustin Milligan, Gina Holden. Votes: 37,326.
A Sound of Thunder
However, Bradbury's concept of how the death of a butterfly in the past could have drastic changes in the future is a representation of the butterfly effect and is used as an example of how to consider chaos theory and the physics of time travel. See also "A Gun for Dinosaur" - Short story by L. Sprague de Camp; References
The Butterfly Effect: Making cinema's most disturbing time travel movie
Ashton Kutcher and Eric Stoltz in 2004's The Butterfly Effect. (New Line/Alamy) Perhaps most shocking of all is the movie's original theatrical ending, the climax that helped make Bress and Gruber's script one of the early noughties' most talked about unproduced screenplays. After Evan's attempts at fixing the past continually mess up ...
The Butterfly Effect
Rated: 3.5/4 • Aug 16, 2016. College student Evan Treborn (Ashton Kutcher) is afflicted with headaches so painful that he frequently blacks out. While unconscious, Evan is able to travel back in ...
How The Butterfly Effect's Time Travel Works
In the theatrical cut of The Butterfly Effect, Evan uses his mother's home movies and goes back to the birthday party where he and Kayleigh met, circa 1989. Evan tells Kayleigh that he hates her ...
How The Butterfly Effect Violates Its Own Time Travel Rules
2004 sci-fi/horror movie The Butterfly Effect has its lead character repeatedly travel through time, but at one point breaks its own rules. Time travel stories are inherently difficult to keep straight, if only because time travel isn't a thing we can actually do, at least that anyone knows of. Thus, writers are forced to rely either on existing scientific theories, or make up their own rules ...
5 Great Movies That Use The Butterfly Effect To Tell Their Stories
RELATED: 5 Horror Movies That Involve Time Travel. One of the first movies to masterfully employ the Butterfly Effect-style plotline was the1981 (though released only in 1987 due to political ...
40 Facts About The Movie The Butterfly Effect
The Butterfly Effect is a captivating and mind-bending movie that has fascinated audiences since its release. Directed by Eric Bress and J. Mackye Gruber, this psychological thriller takes viewers on a thrilling journey through the concept of time travel and the consequences of altering the past. Released in 2004, the film stars Ashton Kutcher ...
The Butterfly Effect
Evan Treborn (Kutcher) has lost track of time. From an early age, crucial moments of his life have disappeared into a black hole of forgetting, his boyhood marred by a series of terrifying events he can't remember. Determined to do something now that he was incapable of doing then, Evan purposely travels back in time, his present-day mind occupying his childhood body, in an attempt to re-write ...
The Butterfly Effect (2004) < Explanation < Time-travel movies
The real physics behind time-travel movies; Contact; Nav Social Menu. Time-travel movies. The Butterfly Effect (2004) IMDB rating: 7.6. Plot synopsis. Evan is a young boy, who suffers from memory blackouts when experiencing traumatic events. ... Guyline for The Butterfly Effect (2004) Chodos, A. (2004). Butterflies, Tornadoes, and Time Travel.
The Butterfly Effect Movies
A Gulf war veteran is wrongly sent to a mental institution for insane criminals, where he becomes the object of a doctor's experiments, and his life is completely affected by them. Director: John Maybury | Stars: Adrien Brody, Keira Knightley, Daniel Craig, Kris Kristofferson. Votes: 119,239 | Gross: $6.30M. 10.
Butterfly Effect Time Travel Rule-Breaking Scene Is STILL Bothering Fans
Published Dec 23, 2022. Many years after its release, one scene in The Butterfly Effect which breaks the movie's own time travel rules is still bothering fans to this day. One scene in The Butterfly Effect is still bothering fans to this day. Released in 2004, the sci-fi thriller stars Ashton Kutcher as Evan Treborn who, as a child, has a ...
The Butterfly Effect (2004) Movie Ending Explained: What Are Two
The Butterfly Effect (2004) Film Summary & Plot Synopsis "The Butterfly Effect" is a sci-fi thriller featuring Ashton Kutcher, John Patrick Amedori, Logan Lerman, Irina Gorovaia, Amy Smart, Eldon Henson, Jesse James, and Melora Walters. The movie begins with a patient hiding under a table and writing a note, saying that if someone finds it ...
The Butterfly Effect (4/10) Movie CLIP
The Butterfly Effect movie clips: http://j.mp/1BvrLDIBUY THE MOVIE: http://bit.ly/2cyYMHTDon't miss the HOTTEST NEW TRAILERS: http://bit.ly/1u2y6prCLIP DESCR...
Butterflies, Tornadoes, and Time Travel
In the movie The Butterfly Effect, actor Ashton Kutchner plays a man who has found a way to travel back in time to his youth. Each time he returns to his childhood, he makes minuscule changes that radically alter his life in the present, inevitably leading to (you guessed it) terrifying results. Human time travel is a purely fictional concept ...
The real butterfly effect and maggoty apples
In the real world, as I mentioned, the small-scale errors are already saturated at the initial time. The AI system never learns about the real butterfly effect from its training data. The results demonstrate that you must be cautious when applying AI to the weather-forecast problem; it does not contain the physics of the real butterfly effect.

Retrospective: is The Butterfly Effect the most horrifically bleak time travel movie of all time?

The Butterfly Effect

Joel Edgerton tangles with quantum physics, alternate reality and himself (kinda) in Dark Matter

The best horror movies on Amazon Prime Video New Zealand

The best movies of 2024 so far… and where to watch them

The rules of the rom-com run free in The Idea of You

The 20 best movies to watch on TVNZ+

The best TV shows on TVNZ+

The best horror movies on NEON

The best horror movies on Netflix New Zealand

Password reset

SORRY TO SAY, FLICKS NO LONGER SUPPORTS IE9

Cookie banner

The Meanest Time Travel Movie Ever Made, 20 Years Later

Share this story

Share All sharing options for: The Meanest Time Travel Movie Ever Made, 20 Years Later

The Ringer ’s Streaming Guide

Amanda Dobbins on the 2017 Oscars’ Best Picture Fiasco | Ringer Moments

Ashton Kutcher, Of All People, Made a Hugely Underrated Time-Travel Thriller

‘The Butterfly Effect’ 20 Years Later: Exploring the Dark Side of Time Travel

You may like

Six Post-Apocalyptic Thrillers to Watch While You Wait for “Fallout” Season 2

‘Infested’ Review – One of the Best Spiders Attack Horror Movies in Years

Limited Edition Morticia & Wednesday Addams ‘Monster High’ Dolls Releasing Next Week!

‘The King Tide’: An Island Town Rots with Moral Decay in Canadian Folk Horror Fable [Review]

5 Deep Cut Horror Movies to Seek Out in May 2024

TWO New ‘Evil Dead’ Movies Now in the Works; Sébastien Vaniček & Francis Galluppi Directing

Sign up for the Rotten Tomatoes newsletter to get weekly updates on:

Movies / TV

The Butterfly Effect

What to Know

Audience Reviews

More Like This

How The Butterfly Effect's Time Travel Works

The Time Travel in The Butterfly Effect

CINEMABLEND NEWSLETTER

How Time Travel Happens In The Butterfly Effect

Can History Be Changed As A Result Of Time Travel In The Butterfly Effect?

What Are The Consequences Of Time Travel In The Butterfly Effect?

We'll Come Back For You

Most Popular

5 Great Movies That Use The Butterfly Effect To Tell Their Stories

Frequency (2000)

Mr. Nobody (2009)

Run Lola Run (1998)

Donnie Darko (2001)

The Butterfly Effect (2004)

40 Facts About The Movie The Butterfly Effect

Key Takeaways:

The Butterfly Effect was released in 2004.

Ashton Kutcher stars as the lead character, Evan Treborn.

The movie explores the concept of the butterfly effect.

The Butterfly Effect has multiple alternative endings.

It has a nonlinear narrative structure.

The film tackles sensitive topics such as child abuse and mental illness.

The movie’s tagline is “Change one thing, change everything.”

The Butterfly Effect was a commercial success.

It received mixed reviews from critics.

The movie has a dedicated fan base.

The film’s soundtrack features popular songs from the early 2000s.

The Butterfly Effect has inspired several sequels and spin-offs.

It was initially considered a risky project.

The movie’s production budget was $13 million.

The film received an R rating.

The Butterfly Effect explores the concept of fate versus free will.

The movie was shot in Vancouver, Canada.

The script for The Butterfly Effect was originally titled “The Chaos Theory.”

The Butterfly Effect has gained a reputation as a cult classic.

The film’s success helped solidify Ashton Kutcher’s transition into more serious roles.

The Butterfly Effect explores the idea of unintended consequences.

The movie’s title refers to the butterfly effect theory coined by mathematician Edward Lorenz.

The Butterfly Effect delves into the blurred boundaries between reality and memory.

The production team considered several other actors for the lead role before casting Ashton Kutcher.

The movie’s twist ending has become iconic.

The movie’s release date was delayed due to its dark themes and ending.

The Butterfly Effect features a stellar supporting cast.

It explores the concept of memory repression and retrieval.

The film’s cinematography enhances its dark and atmospheric tone.

The movie’s concept has sparked philosophical discussions.

The Butterfly Effect has a nonlinear timeline.