srixon z star tour compression

Srixon Z-Star 2023 Golf Ball Review

Published: 23 January 2023 Last updated: 23 June 2023

At a glance

• TG Rating 5 out of 5
• Owner Rating Not yet rated
• RRP £47.99

What we say...

The 2023 srixon z-star is jam-packed with new technology designed to help golfers deliver more distance and better spin..

For 2023 Srixon have released their eighth generation of Z-Star, one of the best golf balls in the game. The brand claim that the new generation of balls will be the most complete package yet with “unmatched” performance and feel.

Srixon say this iteration of the Z-Star will be the most responsive yet. With an extra thin urethane cover golfers will see more spin on the shots around the green.

Partnered with the cover, the new Spin Skin+ coating creates increased friction between the club and the ball. This results in more control on approach shots and higher levels of spin on and around the green.

The Z-Star features Srixon’s unmistakable Speed Dimple, the 338 aerodynamic dimple design that is used across the brand’s family, and is key to the success of many of their balls.

The dimples help with the launch of the ball even in most testing conditions. Their deep dimensions produce less drag which in turn helps maintain a penetrating ball flight.

The new FastLayer DG Core is a key part of making the Z-Star perform how it does. The soft to firm design of the core is intended to give golfers a great feel off the face whilst delivering greater ball speeds.

The standard Z-star is engineered with a thin mid-layer and softer compression to prioritize a softer feel and approach shot spin.

New tech for 2023

The Srixon Z-Star is one of the  best tour golf balls , you can find out which Srixon ball is best for you here. We see how the 2023 model is better than previous versions.

FastLayer DG Core

The all-new FastLayer core is soft in the center and rapidly becomes firm around its edge. As a result, players with high swing speeds benefit from great feel and plenty of ball speed for maximized distance

Srixon’s redeveloped Spin Skin is a durable coating that digs deep into your wedge and iron grooves, allowing golfers maximum spin for better control and stopping power.

Speed Dimple

Srixon’s 338 aerodynamic speed dimples result in more distance and better performance in the wind, reduced drag at launch, and increase lift during descent.

What Srixon say about the Srixon Z-Star

Joe Miller, Product expert at Srixon Sports Europe

“Finding the right golf ball for your game is just as important as finding the right irons or driver.

“It’s the one piece of equipment you use on every single shot, which is why technological advances like the new Spin Skin+ and FastLayer DG Core give players confidence that their ball is going to react how it should and excel in every category that matters – more spin, bite, and speed.”

READ NEXT –  TaylorMade TP5 golf ball review – Titleist Pro V1 golf ball review – Callaway Chrome Soft golf ball review

BECOME A TODAY’S GOLFER MEMBER:  Unlimited access to premium content and exclusive rewards!

Product Information

Srixon z-star.

RRP £47.99  per dozen |  VIEW UK OFFER   / $47.99 |  VIEW US OFFER  

Construction Three-piece ball

Cover Urethane

Compression  92

Swing Speeds  90+ MPH

Launch  Mid

Colours White and Yellow

First released:  February 2023

www.srixon.com

Photo Gallery

Your Reviews

Srixon balls user reviews.

Remove Product?

• Z-STAR Series

Z-STAR Golf Balls

Z-STAR provides maximum greenside spin for unmatched control and stopping power. Its premium 3-piece construction gives skilled players complete tour performance, tee to green.

• Estimated Ship Date: N/A Available To Order Estimated Ship Date: 5/21/2024

A WINNING FORMULA

To push the limits of your game, you need a ball with all the right ingredients. That’s why the entire Z-STAR Series was designed to deliver tour-level distance, control and feel, from tee to green. Starring a reformulated FastLayer DG Core and improved Spin Skin+ coating, you, too, can experience the formula trusted by Major Champions when wins are on the line.

FASTLAYER DG CORE

The trade-off is age-old: hard cores are fast, soft cores are slow. But the firmer a golf ball, the harsher it feels at impact, which can reduce your confidence when the pressure is on. That’s why our new FastLayer DG Cores are soft at the center and get firmer from the inside out. The contrasting compression helps them rebound quicker off the face for incredible distance while still providing exceptional feel.

NEW SPIN SKIN+ COATING

This micronic layer of specialized urethane increases the cover’s degree of friction for even more spin and control.

THIN, PREMIUM COVER

Every Z-STAR Series golf ball features an extra thin, thermoplastic urethane cover to provide tour-level stopping power around the greens.

SPEED DIMPLE™ PATTERN

With their deep dimensions, the 338 Speed Dimples on each Z-STAR Series golf ball punch through air for a penetrating launch. Once aloft, the dimples generate lift, driving the ball upward toward its peak and maximizing glide distance during descent. When conditions get tough and the winds reach high speeds, the 338 Speed Dimples’ low drag coefficient helps the ball stay on target through the moving air and maintain distance in headwinds.

MODEL COMPARISON

Z-STAR provides maximum spin and exceptional feel for pinpoint approach shots and unmatched stopping power on the greens.

Z-STAR XV offers maximum ball speed for unmatched Driver and Iron distance, while still enjoying plenty of greenside control.

Z-STAR ♦ DIAMOND delivers a blend of long-game distance and greenside control, plus increased spin on long and mid Iron shots.

SWING SPEED

CONSTRUCTION

COVER MATERIAL

COVER THICKNESS

COMPRESSION

DIMPLE NUMBER

Available in both Pure White and Tour Yellow.

PERSONALIZED BALLS

Let your creativity and personal style shine every time you tee it up with a personalized box of Z-STAR Series golf balls. Add up to 17 characters or three lines of text. Choose any letters, numbers, typical keyboard symbols, or specialty logos.

Personalize

• Play Number
• Custom Text

Add a Play Number. Must be 1 or 2 digit numerical value from 0-99

We reserve the right to refuse to imprint words, phrases, or symbols that are inappropriate or trademarks of other brands.

Ball Reviews

Srixon z-star tour ball review.

Z-STAR Tour

Srixon Z-Star / Z-Star SL / Z-Star XV Price: $45/dozen

Golf Digest Hot List Rated: Performance: 4.5 stars Innovation: 4.5 stars Feel: 4.5 stars Demand: 2 stars

Tech Talk: The Z-Star line expands this year to include the lower compression SL, which is designed to produce a higher launch angle for average swing speeds. Each model features a large-core design that increases in firmness from center to exterior in a unique gradient. The urethane covers are among the thinnest in the game, including the firmer-compression XV (.012 inches) Verdict: The standard Z-Star provides the most spin around the green of the three balls, but the SL offers an intriguing alternative that many of our players preferred.

—— More information:

The new Z-STAR golf ball’s proprietary urethane cover is super soft for added spin control without sacrificing distance. The 324 aerodynamic dimple design, combined with the large Energetic Gradient Growth(TM) core, produces a penetrating ball flight that is unyielding to the wind. The Z-STAR is available in both Pure White and Tour Yellow for added visual performance.

HOW IT COMPARES

The Z-STAR is a high performance multilayered ball with extremely soft feel. This offering is the softer of the two premium Z-STAR balls and provides slightly more spin and feel around the green. The Z-STAR performs best with driver swing speeds between 80 mph and 105 mph.

WHAT IS S.T.A.R. PERFORMANCE

SPIN- Tuned to increase distance on the driver while providing unparalleled stopping power on approach shots.

TRAJECTORY- Designed to produce an aggressive ball flight that maximizes distance regardless of weather conditions. High ball speed is maintained for a longer period of time during flight.

ACCELERATION-Developed to maximize the energy transfer to the ball for more ball speed resulting in greater distance.

RESPONSIVENESS-Configured to provide great touch and feel greenside. In addition, the ball is responsive on full shots that need to be shaped.

2012 Bridgestone B330-RX and RXS Golf Ball Editor Review

TaylorMade Penta TP5 Ball

GolfWRX is the world's largest and best online golf community. Expert editorial reviews, breaking golf tour and industry news, what to play, how to play and where to play. GolfWRX surrounds consumers throughout the buying, learning and enrichment process from original photographic and video content, to peer to peer advice and camaraderie, to technical how-tos, and more. As the largest online golf community we continue to protect the purity of our members opinions and the platform to voice them. We want to protect the interests of golfers by providing an unbiased platform to feel proud to contribute to for years to come. You can follow GolfWRX on Twitter @GolfWRX and on Facebook .

10 Comments

pooperacyjne

Jun 19, 2014 at 2:53 am

Yet another issue is really that video gaming became one of the all-time greatest forms of excitement for people of every age group. Kids engage in video games, plus adults do, too. Your XBox 360 is just about the favorite video games systems for individuals that love to have hundreds of activities available to them, plus who like to learn live with people all over the world. Thank you for sharing your notions.

Aug 8, 2013 at 8:09 pm

What is up with the latest Z-star?? I’ve played them for the last year and a half, but out of the last 2 dozen I’ve purchased, I’ve had 5 golf balls crack. It starts as a small line in the urethane cover and progresses to a full separation of the underlying core.

Jul 25, 2013 at 1:02 am

This review was not well thought out at all. It hardly mentions anything about the XV which a lot of us get on here to see how it compares to other balls like the Pro-V X1 and other balls. More effort needs to be done…

Jun 29, 2013 at 3:25 pm

Like the Z Star SL. Get better distance yet similar control to Q Star. Find it comparable to Callaway Hex Chrome & Bridgestone B-330 RX.

Dean Stewart

Sep 10, 2012 at 11:14 am

Agreed this was not a review…however let us not go ‘dark’ here.

Aug 20, 2012 at 11:39 pm

This is not a review…;. this is a cut and paste without any real substance . I can see that from your review you pretty much picked your nose and fingered your dog and this just wasted 2 min that i cant get back !

Avishek Dey

Jul 29, 2012 at 4:14 am

Check out the Srixon University webpage on Srixon. Tells you more about the Srixon range of Golf Balls. Helps you find the best golf ball suited for your game.

http://www.srixon.com/srixonuniversity.html

Jul 28, 2012 at 4:09 pm

You really should try the Bridgestone B330-RX

http://www.golfwrx.com/33152/2012-bridgestone-b330-rx-and-rxs-golf-ball-editor-review/

Pretty solid ball.

Blair M. Phillips

Jul 21, 2012 at 1:24 am

I use a Srixon soft cover and low compression ball. I get good results with my swing and clubs. Can someone name one other ball being made in 2012 that fits my swing and equipment?

Feb 5, 2014 at 10:36 pm

2014 NXT Tour S.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

You may like

Jason Day on his recent switch into Srixon ZX5 and ZX7 Mk II irons

Tua Tagovailoa’s WITB + 9 interesting equipment photos from the Cognizant Classic

A mysterious prototype 3-wood and 10 interesting gear photos from the Tour

7 gear takeaways from an utterly chaotic week in golf equipment at The Sentry

Here’s why Vijay Singh has red numbers written all over his irons

Adam Scott makes 3 more big changes to his equipment setup at the Memorial

Is the Future of Golf Balls Lower Spin?

For years now, TaylorMade has been preaching lower spin to create more distance, especially in its drivers. Its original SLDR driver was actually so low spinning that TaylorMade encouraged golfers to try higher-lofted club heads, or to “loft up,” so golf balls wouldn’t dive out of the air. Now, when you look around at the popular drivers in the industry, most of them are designed to lower spin. TaylorMade was ahead of the curve.

With its new TP5 and TP5x golf balls, TaylorMade is pushing a similar initiative: lower spin on all full shots.

“This ball is different. You can make the argument this is too hot a golf ball for people who don’t spin it (enough). But that’s not the large percentage of golfers.”

For driver shots, it’s easy to understand the benefit of lower spin as long as the golfer launches it high enough. Low spin plus high launch equals more distance; that’s just a math equation. But with golf balls, as opposed to drivers, their jobs are also to get close to the hole, not just go as far and straight possible. With that in mind, is lower spin necessarily beneficial on ALL full shots, including the irons?

For Jon Rahm and Rory McIlroy, who both switched to TaylorMade TP5x golf ball this season — the lower-spinning and slightly firmer-feeling golf ball in the TP5 line — the answer is clearly “yes.” Rahm saw an 800 rpm drop in iron spin with a 4-iron compared to his Titleist’s Pro V1x golf ball and a 400 rpm drop in driver spin, according to TaylorMade. McIlroy saw up to 10 yards in extra distance with a 5-iron, and he picked up distance with the driver, as well. According to Eric Loper, Director of Golf Ball R&D at TaylorMade, McIlroy was hitting his 7 iron at 16.1 degrees of launch with 6350 rpm, and his 4 iron at 11.1 degrees of launch with 3800 rpm during his initial Trackman testing at The Bear’s Club.

“(With a 7 iron) you have to hit it about 7000 (rpm) or less, and he was hitting (his previous ball) up to 7500 (rpm),” Loper said. “That’s too high… (With the TaylorMade TP5x) he didn’t express any concern with (spin being too low). It was launching high, getting to its apex and landing soft.”

Hoyt McGarity, President of True Spec Golf , an internationally renowned custom club fitter with more than a dozen locations, has seen similar performance gains with TaylorMade’s TP5x golf ball through his personal testing and his testing with Tour players. He said he’s seeing 2-3 mph more ball speed compared to other golf balls. Just as importantly, he’s seeing those gains with a higher ball flight in what he called “straight up” club tests.

“Some of the Tour players — straight up, same loft, same lie, same golf club, same everything — they would launch this golf ball almost a degree higher, which is amazing,” McGarity said. “I was seeing almost 2-3 mph more ball speed for these Tour players, not that they need more distance, but I’m like, ‘You’re launching higher and it’s going further and it’s still coming in soft; it’s not coming in low and hot. It’s coming in high and still soft, so what’s the disadvantage?’ If you’re a low-ball hitter with low spin, you might have some issues. Your half shots might be tough to control the distance on it, that’s all.”

So while TaylorMade’s TP5 and TP5x golf balls are designed to go farther and with less spin on full shots, the company says their steeper landing angles will help them stop nearly as fast as higher-spinning balls. TaylorMade’s belief is based on the company’s scientific bounce-and-roll calculations, which factor in green conditions and landing characteristics. Yes, the lower spin of its golf balls in relation to competitors leads to minimally more roll out, but the amount is insignificant according to TaylorMade: an additional 1-1.5 feet. The company also points out that with a longer-flying golf ball, golfers will be hitting shorter clubs into greens, leading to more control. An 8 iron will yield greater stopping power and accuracy than a 7 iron, right?

Expert fitter Scott Felix of Felix Clubworks  agrees with TaylorMade in theory. He said that as long as the golf ball is coming into a green at a steep enough angle, low spin is not a problem for approach shots.

“Most golfers spin the ball too much with their irons, costing them distance,” Felix said, “…but for golfers who already have a flat trajectory (with their irons), lowering spin won’t help them hold the green.”

McGarity added that about 80 percent of golfers who come to him for a fitting spin the ball too much, and for Tour players, the drop in spin won’t have a detrimental effect.

“Lets say the average spin on Tour is 6,000 (rpm with a 6 iron); it’s not like [TaylorMade’s TP5x golf ball is spinning] around 4,000 (rpm),” McGarity said. “If your average land angle is 49 degrees, they’re hitting these balls at say 5800 spin, which I think is great, and with a 50-degree land angle, so what’s the harm? It’s not like it’s coming in at 44 degrees; that’d be probably a one hop over the back and get into a little trouble.”

On the other hand, Felix notes that some Tour players simply want maximum control from a golf ball due to firmer fairway and green conditions, so lowering spin isn’t always the best option for them. But for average golfers, the distance gains will be beneficial.

“Most golfers aren’t playing in Tour conditions and will simply benefit from hitting the ball farther and having shorter irons into the green,” Felix said.

McGarity also warns golfers who already play low-spinning irons and drivers, and who spin the ball below 2,000 rpm with the driver, that the TP5 and TP5x golf balls may not be for them.

“This ball is different,” McGarity said. “You can make the argument this is too hot a golf ball for people who don’t spin it (enough). But that’s not that large percentage of golfers.”

After announcing an equipment contract with TaylorMade at The Players Championship, Rory McIlroy called TaylorMade’s TP5x golf ball the most important factor in his decision to sign with the company. With the new ball, he said he not only picked up distance, but consistency and control in the wind.

“I wasn’t really happy with the golf ball I was playing, and I needed to do something,” McIlroy said. “I felt like I struggled in the wind. So I sort of went back to the drawing board and tested for about 10 days pretty extensively after Augusta … I worked with the TaylorMade guys one day and started just on Trackman on the range and saw stuff with the golf ball … I thought, ‘Wow, this is what I need.’ This is exactly the thing that I’ve been struggling with.”

McGarity’s experiences confirmed McIlroy’s sentiments.

“I picked up a half club and I sit around and hit balls all the time on Trackman, so for me to pick up a half a club, it’s not the club it has to be the ball,” McGarity said. “And into the wind I can definitely see it’s more penetrating. I’m not a super high-spin player, so some shots I’ll hit the ball farther than I expected, but I’d rather have that issue than (to hit it) short.”

So there’s agreement that the ball spins less, goes farther and performs better in the wind with irons. But when fitting a golf ball, is iron play even the best place to start? Golf is about more than just iron shots, after all.

For Felix, a ball fitting begins by having a client hit “a bunch” of different golf balls on the putting green to narrow it down to a few based on feel preferences. Then he has the golfer take those golf balls to the chipping green and bunker. He then works back to 40-yard shots, narrowing down the options throughout the process based on feel and performance. After that, golfers will progress to the driver, and then to the irons.

“Usually you want to get a few balls you really like on and around the greens, then work backwards from there,” Felix said.

Initial testing for McIlroy started on the golf course, and not on Trackman, according to TaylorMade representatives. Once he became comfortable with performance and feel, he then took to Trackman to get dialed in with spin and match the golf ball to his equipment.

TaylorMade’s TP5x and TP5 golf ball (right), which has a slightly firmer feel.

Despite the low-spinning qualities of the golf balls on full shots, TaylorMade believes it’s giving up nothing to the competition in terms of short game performance. “There’s no golf ball that spins more around the greens,” a TaylorMade representative told me. That’s a legal way of saying no other golf ball company can prove, with confidence, that its golf ball spins more around the greens.

By producing extremely low spin on full shots, but without giving up performance and feel around the greens, TaylorMade says it’s providing the best qualities from each end of the spectrum with its TP5 and TP5x golf balls. But… how? TaylorMade engineers accomplished the feat by using larger and softer-compression cores. TaylorMade says the cores “activate” at 70 mph of swing speed inside of the five-piece constructions, which also have firm mantle layers and soft, urethane covers. The result is low spin on full shots, and high spin on shorter shots.

“It’s the real first golf ball (TaylorMade has) made that’s a game changer,” McGarity said.

TaylorMade does admit, however, that golfers may be sacrificing a bit of “workability” with the irons. That’s to say hitting hooks and slices with its golf balls becomes more difficult due to the lower spin. While the TP5 will offer a bit more of that control than the TP5x, it’s definitely something to keep in mind for those who prefer to play a Bubba Watson-style of golf.

Looking to the future

So does all of this mean that lower-spinning golf balls on full shots are the future of golf? Will we see golf equipment companies striving for drastically lower spin over the next few years?

TaylorMade representatives say they continue to chase lower spin in their prototyping, and until the golf ball is diving out of the air to the golfer’s detriment, lower spin is the future of golf balls. Obviously, TaylorMade is fully committed to a lower-spinning golf ball, and lower spin in general throughout its product lines.

For other premium golf ball manufacturers, bringing lower-spinning options to the market seems likely, given the performance benefits and Tour validation of TaylorMade’s new golf balls. But there’s a reason there are so many variations of golf balls on the market; every golfer is different. Some need more spin with the driver and want more workability with the irons, some want a super firm feel and others just want the cheapest ball possible.  

Golfers should view TaylorMade’s TP5 and TP5x golf balls as options in the vast marketplace of golf balls, and perform thorough testing to figure out if this is the right line of golf balls for their game. And remember, lower spin and more distance will require recalibrating your iron distances, and possibly adjusting your equipment, so a mid-season switch is recommended only to those who are willing to put in the necessary work.

Review: Callaway Chrome Soft X Golf Balls

Pros:  Incredibly soft feel like the Chrome Soft, but the Chrome Soft X increases spin through the bag to give better players more control.

Cons:  Golfers who struggle with too much slice or hook won’t find it any easier to keep shots close to the target with the Chrome Soft X.

Who They’re For: Better players with higher swing speeds looking for a soft-feeling ball that checks up faster with iron shots than Chrome Soft.

Callaway says the Chrome Soft is “the ball that changed the ball,” and in many ways that’s true. It’s a tour-level golf ball with a softer feel, less spin through the bag and even a lower price point ($39.99) than some other tour balls in its category.

The Chrome Soft is Callaway’s best ball option for the vast majority of golfers ( and received a 5-star rating by GolfWRX ), but it isn’t for everyone. Callaway’s solution for them is its new Chrome Soft X golf ball.

What’s New in the Chrome Soft X

The original Chrome Soft golf ball, launched in 2015 had the very soft compression of 65. When Callaway released the 2016 version of Chrome Soft, it gave the ball a slightly higher compression (75), which improved its consistency on short-iron shots. The compression of its new Chrome Soft X is 90.

The reason for the higher compression has to do with the low-spin profile of the Chrome Soft, a blessing to most golfers as it helps their shots fly straighter and farther. It’s not ideal for some tour pros and better golfers, however. We’re talking about the kind of golfers who have great mechanics and strike shots consistently on the center of the club face. They often have a ball flight that is so dialed in that the lower-spinning performance of the Chrome Soft makes their shots harder to control. To address that small but important segment of the golfing population, Callaway created the higher-spinning Chrome Soft X.

Under the hood, Callaway used a slightly thinner urethane cover, increased the size and hardened the compression of the Dual SoftFast core, and enhanced the HEX Aerodynamics. As a result, the Chrome Soft X should generate more ball speed and spin through the entire bag.

Dave Bartels, Callaway’s Senior Director of Golf Ball R&D, says golfers will be able will notice the differences and have a clear favorite. “We expect that golfers who like the Chrome Soft X probably won’t like the Chrome Soft very much, and vice versa.”

Performance

Since the Chrome Soft X is meant to be a complimentary golf ball to the Chrome Soft, we tested them head-to-head.

Compared to the Chrome Soft the Chrome Soft X should:

• Feel almost as soft as the Chrome Soft with the same durability.
• Generate more spin where better golfers need it.
• Generate faster ball speeds.

Like previous reviews, I tested these on the course and on a launch monitor with a 60-degree wedge, 6-iron and a driver. To allow me to re-hit each ball numerous times, I completed the testing indoors on a camera-based SkyTrak launch monitor. To keep the numbers as consistent as possible between the balls, I threw out and re-hit any shots that were not struck on the center and did not land within a designated target zone for each club (Wedge: +/- 3yards, 6 Iron: +/- 8 yards, Driver: Target width of 40 yards).

But I’m not a robot, so take that into account.

60-degree full wedge shots

What the data actually shows: Pretty much as expected. Overall, the Chrome Soft X clocked 1 mph more ball speed, 136 rpm more spin and carried 2 yards farther. These are very subtle differences, and for an amateur like me I would not expect to notice a difference on the course.

The larger Dual SoftFast core and higher compression could account for the additional ball speed and carry distance. For me, 2 yards won’t require much of an adjustment. If you are a better player completely dialed in with your distances, you might need to make a minor adjustment.

What I saw on the course: When I’m testing golf balls, I like to drop one down without looking at the label and hit a shot. This allows me to remain unbiased in my expectation and just watch what the ball does. When I did this test with the Chrome Soft X on a full wedge shot, I was instantly impressed. The feel was incredible and the distance was spot on. After the wedge testing, I would’ve put this ball straight in the bag.

6-iron shots

What the data actually shows: The Chrome Soft X is continuing to spin more through the bag. Ball speeds were slightly higher by about 0.8 mph. The Chrome Soft X generated a considerable amount of additional spin, but also flew slightly higher and had a steeper descent angle.

Just like you’ll see with the driver below, the additional spin decreased my distance (the Chrome Soft X averaged 3 yards less carry and 4 yards less total distance), but increased my stopping power.

What I saw on the course: Just like previous Chrome Soft balls, the feel off the club face with mid irons was very soft. I really noticed the additional spin on the course, as my draw shot shape started to get a little more curve to it and my shots stopped faster on the greens. I felt like I was able to attack greens with longer irons, flying shots all the way to the hole instead of playing a little short and letting the ball release more.

Driver shots

Main differences we expect to see: The Chrome Soft X should spin more slightly more and deliver higher ball speeds than the Chrome Soft.

What the data actually shows: I am not a high swing-speed player. My average playing swing speed is around 105 mph, which is generally considered the cut-off before you have a “high swing speed.” Also, I am not a low-spin player, so having a ball that can spin a little more might not be the best for my specific game. Based solely on that, I would not expect to see the full benefits of the Chrome Soft X

The testing backs this up. The Chrome Soft X delivered the same ball speed, but with 432 rpm more spin. Bartels says Callaway’s testing has shown golfers either spinning the Chrome Soft and Chrome Soft X the same off the tee, or an increase of 100-200 rpm with the Chrome Soft X. He called 400 rpm “within the ballpark,” but not typical.

Just to be clear, we’re talking about a change in performance that resulted in just 1 yard less carry distance and 3 yards less total distance; basically nothing.

What I saw on the course: As my launch monitor data showed, the Chrome Soft X appeared to fly higher and not roll as much when it hit the ground.

The one place I saw a benefit to the Chrome Soft X was when I contacted a drive high off the club face. With the Chrome Soft, these drives fell out of the sky more quickly, costing me carry distance. With the Chrome Soft X, they stayed in the air a little longer. It’s clear for low-spin players, or those with already optimal launch conditions, the Chrome Soft X can provide as good, if not better performance.

Around the Green

I put the Chrome Soft X through the paces of low spinners, high flop shots, bump and runs, and bunker shots. As expected, it performed identically to the Chrome Soft.

Feel is subjective, but I found the Chrome Soft X to be one of the softest tour balls on the market today.

I completed all my testing with only one ball, so it saw a considerable amount of shots. Like previous Chrome Soft balls, the Chrome Soft X is very durable. It took a beating with the 60-degree and showed only light scuff marks. Both the Chrome Soft X and the Chrome Soft perform very similarly in terms of durability.

The Takeaway

The Chrome Soft X isn’t for everyone and that is why Callaway is marketing the “X” as a complimentary ball to the Chrome Soft and not a replacement.

With the changes Callaway has made, the Chrome Soft X checks off all the criteria for a high-performance premium golf ball. If you thought the 2016 Chrome Soft was a little too soft with too little spin through the bag, the Callaway Chrome Soft X might just be the ball you’re looking for.

Review: Callaway Chrome Soft golf balls

Pros:  The Chrome Soft has an incredibly soft feel, but doesn’t skimp on performance. It will create maximum distance off the tee for 99 percent of golfers, yet offers short-game spin that rivals more expensive models.

Cons: Golfers with high swing speeds (105+ mph) — a.k.a. the 1 percent — may lose a few yards off the tee due to the Chrome Soft’s low-compression design.

Who They’re For:  Any golfer can play the Chrome Soft.

Last year, Callaway released the Speed Regime golf ball line , which offered three different golf balls designed for different swing speeds, all with slightly different levels of compression and design. While this gave golfers the ability to really “fit” a golf ball to their game, more choices doesn’t always translate into better decision-making.

With its new Chrome Soft golf balls, Callaway has released just one ball, with one set of specifications, designed to provide a benefit to all golfers regardless of their swing speed.

The three-piece Chrome Soft, with a low-compression Soft Fast core and extremely soft DuraSpin cover, generates lower spin off the driver and long irons for more distance, while generating tour-level spin with shorter irons and shots around the green.

Let’s Talk Core

Thanks to a brand new SoftFast core, as Callaway calls it, the ball has a compression rating of 65. By comparison, last year’s Callaway SR-3 had a compression of around 105. Typically, the softer the core, the more the ball deforms at impact. This is great for slower swing speed players who need the ball to deform more so it can spring back into shape and generate more distance. But faster swing speed players can actually lose distance if the ball is too soft. After experimenting with 39 different prototypes, however, Callaway was able to create the right combination of the core and mantle layer so the Chrome Soft retains the energy from impact and keeps ball speed high — even at faster swing speeds.

The Chrome Soft is available now in White , Soft Yellow and Truvis Technology with an MSRP of $37.99. Custom player numbers and personalization is also available.

We put the new Chrome Soft to the test against the Callaway Speed Regime SR-3, which I tested last year .

Compared to the Speed Regime line the Chrome Soft should:

• Feel softer off every club, with slightly better durability.
• Generate less spin off the driver.
• Create more spin off shorter irons.

Like all reviews, I tested these on the range, on the course, and on a launch monitor with a 60-degree wedge, 6-iron and a driver. I headed to BridgeMill Golf Academy and worked with head pro Tom Losinger to get the data using a Trackman in his indoor studio.

What the data actually shows: Exactly what we expected to see. The Chrome Soft generated 200 rpm more spin than the SR-3, while launching lower and hitting a slightly lower peak height. I did, however, see a big difference in ball speed and carry distance, with the Chrome Soft flying three more yards on average.

Increased ball speed or carry distance with the shorter irons is not typically on the list of requests from better players. In this case, it’s a by-product of the new SoftFast core and three more yards of carry with a 60-degree wedge is fairly significant. That 10-foot putt for birdie is now almost 20. These types of gains will require an adjustment.

What I saw on the course: This ball was perfect inside 100 yards. If it was flying farther than other balls I’ve played, I didn’t notice. The trajectory on full wedge shots was nice and low compared to other balls, and I was already able to notice a difference in feel between the Chrome Soft and the SR-3. A difference of 200 rpm of spin wasn’t noticeable on the course, as both balls performed very similarly when they hit the green.

What the data actually shows:  The data backed up the expectations when it came to ball speed. However, I actually saw more spin on my 6-iron compared to the SR-3 and even other tour balls. This could be due to a variety of factors concerning my individual swing, and other golfers might see less spin off their mid irons. Compared to the SR-3, the Chrome Soft launched a little higher, with more spin and ball speed, allowing it to carry a little more than one yard farther. It also hit a higher peak height with a steeper descent angle.

What I saw on the course:  I was probably most impressed with the Chrome Soft with the mid to long irons. Yes, the ball performed great off the driver, but the softer feel was very apparent with an iron in my hands. Launching shots with mid to long irons had a more effortless feel. I was also able to get some nice height and spin on my longer irons without sacrificing distance, so I could land shots on the green and see them stick, instead of hitting and running off the back.

Main differences we expect to see: The Chrome Soft should spin less, but still generate more ball speed than the SR-3.

What the data actually shows: I’m a borderline high-speed guy with the driver. My average swing speed is around 106 mph — right on the borderline where golfers can start to “over-compress” the Chrome and possibly lose distance.

You may have read editor Zak Kozuchowski’s reviews on GolfWRX, who can generate more than 115 mph of swing speed with his driver. In his on-course testing , he said he hit the Chrome Soft about the same distance as other tour balls.

“If they liked everything else about the ball, I can’t imagine a golfer who swings 105+ mph wouldn’t play the Chrome Soft just because it was a few yards shorter than a higher-compression tour ball off the tee,” he said. “If a soft feel is important to them, that’s going to take precedence over a few yards of extra distance. And they’ll get those few yards back with their long irons, anyways.”

In my testing, the Chrome Soft generated slightly faster ball speeds, and a lot less spin — almost 300 rpm less spin than the SR-3. This translated into an extra 1.5 yards of carry, and more than 5 extra yards of total distance.

What I saw on the course: The distance gains and lower spin appeared to translate to the course. I wasn’t having any issues getting the ball to run out once it hit the fairway. And the distance appeared to be spot on, if not slightly longer.

Around the green

It is always fun to have that moment in a round where you hit the low, checking chip that freaks out your playing partners. I had that moment from about 55 yards away to a back pin, with out of bounds directly behind the green. With a 56-degree wedge, I hit the low shot and right before the ball hit the green, my playing partners were yelling “get down!” But I knew I hit it well and the ball bounced, checked, and then just lipped the cup.

Could I have executed that shot with other tour balls? Yes. But, it is important to know I can execute it with the Chrome Soft. I’m not a short-game wizard like one of Callaway’s more well-known tour pros, but these balls allow me to hit any kind of shot around the green without hesitation.

The Chrome Soft feels much softer than the SR-3, which was noticeably softer than previous generation Callaway tour balls. The sound profile has a lower, less “clicky” sound that translates into improved feel. The engineers really have brought the incredible feel of the SuperSoft to the tour-level Chrome Soft.

I’ve rolled some beautifully smooth putts with these balls. They are predictable and roll true when you strike them well. While I won’t go so far as to say they are the best feeling golf ball on the market (although they are close), they are the best feeling Callaway golf ball I’ve tested.

When most people hear “softer cover,” they instantly assume it will be less durable — and for good reason. It is counter intuitive to believe that soft equals durable. I’m not going to pretend to know the science behind it, but the DuraSpin cover is made from Thermoplastic Urethane, which actually becomes more durable the softer it gets.

I’ve played numerous rounds with the same ball, and also completed all the testing with only three Chrome Soft golf balls, so I can back up Callaway’s claims. These balls are definitely durable and can last numerous rounds if you don’t lose them. With fresh wedge grooves, I was getting all the spin benefits and little to no scuffing. I did see some minor scuffs after finding some rocky rough off the tee, but the ball was still playable and I shouldn’t have been over there in the first place!

If you’ve avoided Callaway balls in the past because of the “clicky” stigma that has followed them around, it might be time to try a sleeve of the Chrome Soft. Many golfers, myself included, really love the feel of the Callaway SuperSoft , but not the overall performance. The Chrome Soft is a marriage of the soft feel of the SuperSoft with the tour-level performance of the Callaway SR-3. With low spin off the driver and the most spin on short irons of the tour balls I’ve tested this year, the Chrome Soft is one of the best golf balls on the market today.

We gave the Chrome Soft 5 stars, but one of our editors made the case that on a scale of 1-10, the Chrome Soft is an “11.” If you’ve seen the movie Spinal Tap, you know what he means.

See what GolfWRX Members had to say about the Chrome Soft in our Official Forum Testing Thread. 

[wrx_retail_links productid=”12″]

Dave Portnoy places monstrous outright bet for the 2024 Masters

Things got heated at the Houston Open between Tony Finau and Alejandro Tosti. Here’s why

Justin Thomas on the equipment choice of Scottie Scheffler that he thinks is ‘weird’

Tiger Woods arrives at 2024 Masters equipped with a putter that may surprise you

‘Absolutely crazy’ – Major champ lays into Patrick Cantlay over his decision on final hole of RBC Heritage

Report: Tiger Woods has ‘eliminated sex’ in preparation for the 2024 Masters

Two star names reportedly blanked Jon Rahm all week at the Masters

Report: LIV Golf identifies latest star name they hope to sign to breakaway tour

Neal Shipley presser ends in awkward fashion after reporter claims Tiger handed him note on 8th fairway

What we know about Bryson DeChambeau’s 3D-printed Avoda irons

Kevin Tway WITB 2024 (May)

Kevin Tway what’s in the bag accurate as of the Wells Fargo Championship. More photos from the event here. Driver:...

Matthieu Pavon WITB 2024 (May)

Pavon’s WITB accurate as of the Wells Fargo Championship. More photos from the event here.  Driver: Ping G430 Max (9...

WITB Time Machine: Rory McIlroy’s winning WITB, 2015 Wells Fargo Championship

Then-No. 1 player in the world Rory McIlroy began the week at the Wells Fargo Championship at 3-1 odds, if...

Akshay Bhatia WITB 2024 (May)

Akshay Bhatia what’s in the bag accurate as of the Wells Fargo Championship. Bhatia is deciding between drivers. More photos...

LET pro gives detailed financial breakdown of first week on tour…and the net result may shock you

Report: LIV star turns down PGA Championship invite due to ‘personal commitments’

Gary Player claims this is what ‘completely ruined’ Tiger Woods’ career

Team McIlowry (Rory McIlroy, Shane Lowry) winning WITBs: 2024 Zurich Classic

Details on Justin Thomas’ driver switch at the Wells Fargo Championship

Golf fans left surprised by LIV’s choice of course for its 2024 individual championship event

Top 100 Golf Ball Tests & Reviews

• Club Fitting
• Personal Lesson
• Ball Fitting
• GOLF TIPS How To Play: Beginner Tips Golf Drills & Swing Tips Golf Swing Tips Golf Shots & Swing Setups Golf Exercises & Stretches Mental Golf Golf Magazine Online Golf Workouts: Your Health Bunker Golf Tips Golf Alignment Sticks
• GROUPS Pro Golfers Signature Shots Pro Golfers Swing Sequence Better Golf Watching the Pros PGA Tour Players Signature Move Golf's Greatest Teachers Ladies Golf Tips Left Handed Golf Tips Senior Golf Tips & Lessons PGA Players On Course Golf Video Lessons
• EQUIPMENT Drivers Tips Fairway Woods Tips Hybrid Tips Irons Tips Wedges Tips Putting Tips Comparison Charts Best Golf Hybrids Chart Best Golf Irons Chart Best Golf Putters Chart Best Golf Shoes Chart Best Golf Bags Chart Golf Balls Golf Ball Custom Fitting Golf Ball Reviews Golf Ball Compression Chart Golf Ball Comparision Chart Golf Ball Layers Chart Golf Ball Dimples Golf Ball Spin Chart Golf Ball Cover Chart Golf Ball Core Chart Golf Ball Price Chart Top Rated Golf Balls Reviews Golf Iron Reviews Golf Hybrid Reviews Golf Club Reviews, and Test Golf Ball Reviews Golf Glove Reviews Golf Bag Reviews Golf Push Cart Reviews Golf Putter Reviews Golf Shoe Reviews Golf GPS Reviews Golf Shaft Reviews Golf Club Sets Reviews Golf Course Reviews Golf Equipment News Golf Equipment Choices Golf Training Aids Thomas Golf Reviews
• GUIDES Golf Grip Golf Club Fitting Golf Practice Golf Techniques Golf Questions Answered Golf Quiz United States Golf Courses Canada Golf Courses United Kingdom Golf Courses Golf Course Reviews Golf Course Map Unlimited Free Golf Tips & Lessons
• INFO Home Golf Terms Golf Shop Golf in the USA Golf Videos Golf Rules Golf Tours List Golf Jokes Golf News All For Golf History of Golf Handicap Calculator Key Principles of Golf
• SEARCH ARTICLES
• SHOT TYPE Driving Woods Hybrids Irons Bunkers Chipping Putting
• GAME IMPROVEMENT Shot Setup The Golf Swing Practice & Drills Playing Conditions Mental Game Alignment Sticks Questions Answered
• GROUPS Greatest Teachers Pro Golfers Beginners Seniors Ladies Left Handed
• INFO Golf in the USA Personalized Lesson Ball Fitting Club Fitting
• SEARCH VIDEOS

Srixon Z-STAR SL: A Tour Ball for the Rest of Us

Ball tested: Srixon Z-STAR SL

Category: Tour/Advanced/Performance

Tested for golfers with average driving distance of: 196 to 245 (carry + roll) / 246 to 300+ yards (carry + roll)

Specs: Construction – Three-piece; Cover – Urethane; Core – Energetic Gradient Growth; Dimples – 324

Compression: Mid

Price as tested (new): $44.99 per dozen

Ball notes: The softest of the three balls in Srixon’s Z-STAR lineup, the 80-compression Z-STAR SL is geared toward golfers with driver swing speeds below 100 mph. This differentiates it from the Z-STAR and Z-STAR XV , which are best suited to players who swing faster.

Available in yellow, the Z-STAR SL joined its mates as a gold medal winner on Golf Digest’s 2013 equipment Hot List. Let’s see how it stacks up.

On the clubface: A ball with a urethane cover and low-compression core should be soft, and the Z-STAR SL is soft, indeed. You don’t have to be a gorilla to compress it against the clubface, either. The ball smushes and springs off the driver and irons regardless of swing speed, and retains the light feel on and around the greens.

Off the tee: While it takes considerable clubhead speed to get sufficient height out of standard-issue tour balls, like the Z-STAR and XV, the SL version launches nice and high off a driver swung at 85 – 95 mph. Length was good if not great, but it’s difficult to find a ball this soft and playable that’s also long for average swing speeds. Accuracy was quite good, with just enough sideways action to allow for fades and draws without much fear of slices and hooks.

From the fairway / rough: Sometimes, it’s tough to guess how an extra-soft ball will react off the irons. Will it generate too much spin, or flutter rather than penetrate? The Z-STAR SL eased any concerns with a stable, piercing trajectory, plenty of height and a decent amount of spin. This ball feels terrific when struck on the sweet spot, and we loved the hop-spin-and-stop action with the wedges.

Around the green: The SL proved a solid performer in the short game, if not quite as versatile as the standard Z-STAR and XV models. That said, it will suit the needs of most amateurs more than adequately. It’s exquisitely soft off the putter, perhaps too soft for some tastes, and seemed to require a tad more hit on medium-speed greens.

Bottom line: If you’re among the fortunate percentage who can break 105 mph with the driver, we’d recommend the Z-STAR or Z-STAR XV over the SL. But if you’re under 100 mph and want “tour” ball performance without losing yardage, this one makes an excellent choice – especially if soft is your thing.

– Compression Video – Spin Video – Dimples Video – Golf Ball Brands Video – Titleist Video – Understanding Spin Video

Categories Explained:

Value/Recreational/Distance – Designed for mid- to high-handicap golfers with swing speeds below 90 mph; typically feature two-piece construction and firm covers; promote greater distance over high spin rates. Examples: Pinnacle Gold, Slazenger RAW Distance

Premium – Designed for low- to mid-handicap golfers with swing speeds of 90-99 mph; typically feature multi-layer construction and medium-soft covers; happy medium between Value/Recreational and Tour categories for distance and spin qualities. Examples: Titleist NXT Tour, Callaway HEX Diablo

Tour/Advanced/Performance – Designed for low-handicap and professional golfers with swing speeds in excess of 100 mph; typically feature multi-layer construction and soft covers; promote greater spin rates and enhanced feel over distance. Examples: Titleist ProV1, Bridgestone Tour B330

Share This Page

Your information has been received.

(We respect privacy and keep all emails confidential)

You have reached the maximum number of submissions for today.

Equipment Spotlight: Premium brand Thomas Golf - Custom golf clubs with Shot Accuracy Technology

Drivers | Woods | Hybrids | Irons + Wedges | Putters | Chippers | Accessories | Clearance

New Golf Lessons Delivered Each Week

• Please enter a valid email address.

New Product: Hybrid Mini Driver

AT705 Driver 10.5° Right Hand

AT705 Driver 10.5° Left Hand

AT725 Driver 10.5° Right Hand

Pete Styles PGA Pro Instructor

I Will Improve Your Game!

10,000+ videos by PGA Pros

Improve Your Game Fast!

Hybrid Golf Clubs

#1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,PW,GW,SW,LW Right Handed / Left Handed

Only $129 each Includes Free Pro-Fitting Service

AT705 Hybrid Mens

AT705 Hybrid Ladies

AT725 Hybrid Mens

AT725 Hybrid Ladies

My Account | Sitemap | Support This Site | Suggest A Tip

Golf Info Guide copyright 1998-2024, Privacy Policy

Srixon Z Star Review – Could They Enhance Your Game?

A good swing technique is the most important thing for any golfer, but it will only take you so far. You also need the right clubs, the right accessories, and a decent set of golf balls. If we want to push our golfing performance to its absolute limits, we must first acknowledge one simple fact: not all golf balls are created equally. 

In this Srixon Z Star review, we will cover if the new Z Star golf balls are worth the price. 

The Srixon Z Star – a premium golf ball – has been designed to fly straight with one of the softest feels on the market.

But does it live up to its premium expectation? Can it enhance the game of the average golfer ? 

Features and Benefits

1. titleist pro v1, 2. callaway chrome soft, 3. taylormade tp5, who should use the srixon z-star, what’s the difference between srixon z-star and srixon z-star xv, who plays srixon z-star, are srixon z-star good for high handicappers, do any pros use srixon z star, related articles, srixon z star review.

• Incredibly soft, offering maximum control on greens
• High levels of spin for chipping, pitching, and irons
• Good distance
• Highly durable
• Slow swinging players may not benefit from the FastLayer core

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

The fifth generation of the Z Star is packed full of the quality craftsmanship that we have come to expect of Srixon golf balls Z Star . Its technology and design have been subtly refined since the earlier models, granting cutting-edge levels of feel and control. We have no reservations in comparing the quality of this ball to that of the Titleist Pro V1.

This three-piece golf ball is one of the softest balls we have ever tested. It is extremely soft off the putter, with a soft sound to match. On the greens, these things were a joy to hit; we felt totally in control of our putts.

Stepping off the green to try out some chips and pitches, we were treated to some seriously high levels of spin. They don’t spin quite as much as their Z Star XV counterparts, but they are more than capable of providing you with good stopping action for some precise pitching.

You can learn more about the Srixon Z Star vs the Z Star XV in the video below:

Regarding iron and wood play, you might think that the softer structure significantly affects distance. While it’s true that these golf balls won’t go the absolute farthest, we couldn’t help but notice that these things are still capable of some serious distance.

The Srixon Z Star truly lives up to its premium status in terms of durability. After a few joyful sessions of smashing these things around with wedges, irons, and drivers, the wear and tear were minimal.

And, of course, they look great. The pristine cover is dressed in the simple and sharp Srixon design we know and love. It also features the oh-so-helpful double-arrowed line-up graphic.

If you’re the kind of player who favors a soft golf ball, who is looking to push their game into new realms of control without sacrificing distance, the Srixon Z Star could be your perfect match. Higher handicapped player s are welcome to give these balls a whirl, but they probably won’t get as much game advancement as a lower handicapped player.

If you would like a golf ball buying guide , we have written about that in our review of the best golf balls .  

Fast Layer Core

As far as three-piece golf ball designs go, this is about as good as it gets. The FastLayer Core consists of a soft center that gradually becomes firmer towards the edge. This is targeted mostly toward fast-swinging players, allowing them to get good feel while achieving decent ball speeds and distances.

We can certainly attest to the exceptional feel of this ball. It is not as noticeable with the long-game, but the ball speeds and distances we recorded speak to the excellent design of the FastLayer Core. 

4th Generation Spin Skin with SeRM

The cover of the Srixon Z Star is crafted with a special urethane coating , containing flexible molecular bonds that enable it to dig into the grooves of wedges and irons. The goal is to achieve maximum spin, control, and stopping power.

Mission accomplished. These things can spin like crazy, wielding a stopping power, the likes of which we rarely see. We are new to urethane covers, but we would welcome their use in future golf balls.

Speed Dimples

In order to combat the distance-lowering consequences of a softer design, Srixon has built this golf ball with 338 speed-enhancing dimples. These dimples promise to offer less drag and more lift, encouraging straighter flights and greater distances. They also work to counteract the wind.

These certainly flew further than we were expecting, given their softness. And from where we were standing, they flew like a charm, undeterred by drag and wind. 

Compression

The Srixon Z Star golf ball compression clocks in at around 90. You have a softer mid-launch model with low driver spin and the highest greenside spin. 

At a 90 compression rating, golf players who swing the driver anywhere from 80 to 105 mph will see the most reward. Compared to the rest of the market, the Srixon Z Star golf balls offer plenty of firmness. For high handicappers, they can grab plenty of extra distance. 

We give the Srixon Z Star balls 4 out of 5 stars. Its highlight features are ball compression, FastLayer Core, speed dimples, and a 4th generation spin skin. 

If you want a few more yards, the Z Star XV offers a little better launch, and we would consider this the distance ball. On the other hand, the Z Star delivers a slightly better greenside spin. We consider the Z Star more of a mid-launch ball compared to the XV’s higher launch. 

If you’d like to learn more about who makes Srixon golf balls , you can read our full answer. 

Srixon Z Star Alternatives

If you read this Srixon Z Star golf balls review all the way through, and the balls aren’t quite the right match for you, not to worry. Here are some alternatives which you could also check out.

Pro V1s have dominated the market for almost two decades, and their latest incarnation shows no signs of letting up.

Having now entered a new technological space, these balls feature a 17 percent thinner cover than their predecessors – part of a full design aimed at creating more distance than ever before.

No doubt about it, these things truly go the distance – usually further than the Z Stars. Like the Z Star, the cover is made from urethane, meaning decent levels of spin can of course be achieved.

However, since the entirety of the ball has been designed with distance as the priority, it doesn’t offer quite as much control as the Z Star.

Regardless, these balls are used by countless pros, and in the right hands, they can produce some extraordinary results.

The latest Callaway Chrome Soft ball pretty much ticks all of the premium boxes. Its four-piece construction features a dual-core, which works to provide a strong and stable ball flight.

It can achieve remarkable distances, even when faced with some tricky winds.

With irons and wedges, they can be struck with the confidence that they will stop to attention, meaning you can be aggressive with your lines.

In fact, the spin and control is almost equal to that of the Z Star, granting some of the best short-game potential in the market.

Continuing their unique heritage of using a five-layer construction, TaylorMade have once again, quite literally, hit it out of the park with the TP5.

This time, special attention has been paid to the layer just below the cover, which is made of the “ fastest material that TaylorMade has ever used in a golf ball.” 

Needless to say, the distance potential of this ball is up there with the best; it can match the likes of the Pro V1 yard for yard.

Additionally, thanks to the varying levels of firmness in their other layers, the TP5 has a lot to offer in the way of control. It’s not quite the spin king that the Srixon Z Star is, but its overall performance is undeniably brilliant.

The Srixon Z-Star makes sense when you want to maximize your greenside spin with plenty of distance. It would make the perfect choice for those who swing a driver at 80 to 105 mph. They designed it especially for low handicappers. 

The Srixon Z-Star differs from the Srixon Z-Star XV in that the XV flies higher than the Z-Star. One golf expert weighed in by saying that both new generation balls fly lower than in the past. The Srixon Z-Star offers greater greenside spin than the XV.

Brooks Koepka, a professional player on the PGA Tour, is known for using the Srixon Z-Star. In fact, he signed a deal with Srixon toward the end of 2021, which became one of the biggest player moves in the last few years. 

Many high handicappers will appreciate the Srixon Z-Star because many design features were made for them. For example, the softer compression of 90 makes it the ideal choice for high handicappers. The compression will deliver velocity, distance, and a higher launch. 

Currently, five Tour pros have it in their golf bag. Z-Star Golf Balls have gained popularity among the PGA Tour players like Russell Knox, Shane Lowry , Keegan Bradley, Hideki Matsuyama , and Graeme McDowell. When golf professionals trust the equipment, there must be something to the product. 

Final Thoughts

Let’s wrap up our Srizon Z Star review. Srixon’s goal with the newest Z-Star golf balls was to combine a soft feel with superior distance – a feat not easily achieved. However, we can say with confidence that they succeeded. These little gems are among the softest balls we have ever played with, yet they are still capable of some serious yardage.

On the greens, we had maximum control. When pitching, we were greatly encouraged by the stopping power. When driving, we had accuracy and distance. We can only imagine how good these balls feel in the hands of a scratch golfer .

Of course, balls of this quality don’t come cheap. If you’re a high-handicapper, you’ll want to think carefully about whether or not these golf balls are worth your hard-earned cash. Sure, they’re amazing, but you might not notice much difference compared to standard golf balls. They’re not the best golf balls .

If you’re a more advanced player, however, go nuts. Offering unparalleled levels of control and spin without sacrificing any significant distance, the Srixon Z-Star golf balls could be the key to unlocking the next levels of your game. 

• Review: TP5 vs TP5x Golf Balls
• Low Compression Golf Balls
• Titleist AVX Golf Ball Review

Nick is the founder of GolfSpan and an avid golfer. He's not quite a pro but has over 15 years of experience playing and coaching golfers worldwide. His mission is to bring the golfing community a better experience when it comes to choosing the right golf gear and finding the right setup for your game.

• Nick Lomas https://www.golfspan.com/author/nicklomas Callaway Supersoft Golf Balls Review: Pros, Cons, & Costs
• Nick Lomas https://www.golfspan.com/author/nicklomas 14 Golf Exercises For Seniors To Make You More Mobile
• Nick Lomas https://www.golfspan.com/author/nicklomas What Is A Good Golf Handicap: Data Reveals Where You Stand
• Nick Lomas https://www.golfspan.com/author/nicklomas 7 Best Low Compression Golf Balls: Pros & Cons of Using Them

You might also like these

CONNECT WITH US

Get plugged in…

Srixon Z-Star Diamond Golf Ball Review

More in golf balls:.

50 Words or Less

The Srixon Z-Star Diamond golf ball offers substantially different long game performance than its brothers.  Firm feel akin to the Z-Star XV.

Introduction

Srixon’s premium golf ball started 2021 with a bang, winning the year’s first major.  They’re starting this year with a different kind of excitement: the announcement of a third Z-Star golf ball.  In this review, I’ll break down what Z-Star Diamond brings to the game.

Check out our review of the Z-Star and Z-Star XV HERE

Srixon rates the Z-Star Diamond as “Soft” which is the same as the Z-Star XV.  The standard Z-Star is rated as “Softer.”

On the greens, I found the Z-Star Diamond nearly indistinguishable from the Z-Star XV .  Both are noticeably firmer than the Z-Star.  For those that really want to pick the smallest nits, the sound of the Diamond off the putter is fractionally lower pitched than the XV.

From the wedges through the driver, I found it impossible to feel or hear a difference between the Z-Star Diamond and the Z-Star XV.  The standard model can be picked out as being a bit softer if you’re paying close attention.

In the short game, Srixon rates the Z-Star Diamond as having spin between the Z-Star and XV.  They state that the Z-Star has “Highest” greenside spin with the Z-Star XV being simply “High.”

In my testing, I found very modest differences between the three models .  On long pitches and near-full wedges, the difference was not more than a couple hundred RPM.  Though the margins were small, I did see the same order as Srixon, with the Z-Star spinning the most.

This tight grouping in short game spin is probably a positive for most players as it allows you to get your preferred long game performance without sacrificing short game control.  For the few players who want less wedge spin, the Z-Star family may not be for you.

In the long game, the three Srixon Z-Star golf balls separate themselves more clearly.  During iron testing , the Z-Star Diamond produced about 10% more spin the other two.  I did not see a meaningful difference between the Z-Star and Z-Star XV.

That same gap was present in testing with the driver.  Srixon states that the driver spin from the Z-Star and Z-Star XV is “Low,” and my experience is that they are two of the lower-spinning Tour balls.  The Z-Star Diamond is noticeably higher spin off the tee .  This will make it a good choice for low spin players and those who want to shape their drives.  It might also work well for those who strongly favor carry distance over roll.

Srixon staffer Brooks Koepka has found his new gamer with the Srixon Z-Star Diamond.  If you’re seeking elevated spin off the tee and in your approach shots, this might be a great choice for you as well.

Visit Srixon HERE

Recent posts.

• New Level SPN Wedge Review - May 9, 2024
• TaylorMade Qi10 Max Fairway Wood Review - May 8, 2024
• Wiley X Sunglasses Review - May 7, 2024

Guys with a swing speed of 85 to 90 would the Srixon diamond ball be of any or more benefit to me

That probably won’t be the best fit for your long game, but you’ll still get the short game performance out of it. My advice is always to buy a sleeve and see if you like them, or get a professional fitting.

Recently played a sleeve and found these balls to be great for my game. Great off the tee and with approach shots. Hits the window that I aim for (no pun intended). Great spin on the green with the check that I want. Off the putter, it’s firm but true. Played the Z Star and Z Star XV, but truly think the Z Star Diamond is the “Goldilocks” ball for me.

#doublesecret

In robot testing at 85mph was 1yrd behind the longest ball and also no.2 for spin with 7iron. 4th with wedge spin from 35yrds. Best ball overall in these categories.

Leave a Comment Cancel

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Email Address

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• ASICS GEL-KAYANO ACE 2 Golf Shoe Review
• Golf News – May 9, 2024
• New Level SPN Wedge Review
• TaylorMade Qi10 Max Fairway Wood Review
• Sunday Golf Big Rig Cart Bag Review

Contact Us Advertise Subscribe

Advertise on this site.

Plugged In Golf

Do You Like Free Golf Gear?

Sign up for our weekly newsletter and not only will you get the latest reviews, instruction, and more delivered directly to your inbox, you’ll also be entered into regular giveaways for golf clubs and more.

Tee Precision

Srixon Z Star vs Q Star Tour: Which Golf Ball is Best for Your Game?

As a golf enthusiast, I’m always looking for the best equipment to improve my game. One of the most critical pieces of equipment is the golf ball. There are so many options available, but two of the most popular Srixon golf balls are the Z Star and Q Star. In this article, I’ll be comparing the Srixon Z Star vs Q Star to help you decide which one is the best fit for your game.

Both the Z Star and Q Star are tour-level golf balls that offer exceptional performance. The Z Star is designed for golfers with high swing speeds, while the Q Star is ideal for those with moderate swing speeds.

Both balls feature a urethane cover and Spin Skin technology, providing excellent greenside spin and a soft feel. However, there are some differences between the two golf balls that can impact your game, such as the amount of spin and the distance they offer.

In this article, I’ll be taking a closer look at the Srixon Z Star vs Q Star, comparing their features, performance, and suitability for different types of golfers. Whether you’re a beginner or an experienced player, this comparison will help you make an informed decision about which Srixon golf ball is best for your game. So, let’s dive in and explore the differences between these two popular golf balls.

Table of Contents

Srixon z star vs q star tour, golf ball basics, srixon z star, srixon q star, srixon golf balls review video.

When it comes to comparing Srixon’s Z Star vs Q Star Tour golf balls, it’s important to note that both are excellent choices for golfers of all skill levels. The Z Star is a premium ball that’s designed for golfers with high swing speeds, while the Q Star Tour is a softer ball that’s perfect for those with moderate to slightly slower swing speeds.

Design and Performance

The Z Star features a urethane cover and a Spin Skin coating that provides exceptional greenside spin and a soft feel. It’s a high compression ball that’s designed for golfers with fast swing speeds who demand maximum distance and spin.

On the other hand, the Q Star Tour has a softer feel and a lower compression core that’s designed for golfers with moderate swing speeds. It also features a slide ring material that helps reduce side spin and improve accuracy on tee shots.

The Z Star is a premium ball that’s priced higher than the Q Star Tour. However, it’s important to note that both balls are priced competitively compared to other tour-level golf balls on the market. Golfers who are looking for the best performance should consider the Z Star, while those who are looking for a softer ball with great performance at a lower price should go for the Q Star Tour.

Both the Z Star and Q Star Tour are great golf balls that offer excellent performance on the course. Golfers should choose the ball that best suits their swing speed, playing style, and budget.

What to Consider When Choosing a Golf Ball

As a golfer, choosing the right golf ball is crucial to your game. When selecting a golf ball, there are several factors to consider. One of the most important factors is your swing speed.

Golf balls are designed to perform differently depending on your swing speed. Golfers with slower swing speeds will benefit from softer golf balls that provide more spin, while golfers with faster swing speeds will benefit from firmer golf balls that offer more distance.

Another factor to consider is the type of shot you want to hit. Golf balls are designed to perform differently on different types of shots. If you want more control on your approach shots, you may want to consider a golf ball with a softer cover that provides more spin.

If you want more distance off the tee, you may want to consider a golf ball with a firmer cover that offers less spin.

Different Types of Golf Balls

There are several different types of golf balls available on the market. The most common types of golf balls include distance balls, soft feel balls, and tour level balls. Distance balls are designed to provide maximum distance off the tee.

They typically have a firmer cover and a larger core, which helps to reduce spin and increase ball speed. Soft feel balls are designed to provide a softer feel and more spin around the greens. They typically have a softer cover and a smaller core, which helps to increase spin and provide more control on approach shots.

Tour level balls are designed for golfers with high swing speeds who want maximum performance and control. They typically have a urethane cover and a multi-layer construction, which helps to provide maximum spin and control on approach shots. It’s important to note that there is no one “perfect” golf ball for every golfer.

It’s important to experiment with different types of golf balls to find the one that works best for your game.

When it comes to golf balls, Srixon is a brand that many golfers trust. The Srixon Z Star is one of their most popular golf balls, and for good reason. In this section, I will discuss the overview, design and performance, and price of the Srixon Z Star.

The Srixon Z Star is a premium ball that is designed for golfers who demand the best performance from their golf ball. It is a three-piece ball that features a soft urethane cover and a soft core. The ball is designed to provide maximum distance off the tee while still offering excellent control and feel around the greens. The Z Star is available in both white and yellow colors.

The Srixon Z Star is designed to offer golfers maximum performance on the course. The soft urethane cover provides excellent greenside spin and control, while the soft core helps to reduce spin off the tee for maximum distance. The ball also features a new Spin Skin coating that is designed to increase friction between the ball and clubface, resulting in even more spin and control on approach shots.

The Z Star is a ball that is designed for golfers with high swing speeds. The high compression of the ball means that it is best suited for golfers with swing speeds of 100 mph or higher. If you have a slower swing speed, you may want to consider the Srixon Q Star instead.

The Srixon Z Star is a premium ball, and as such, it comes with a premium price tag. A box of Srixon Z Star golf balls typically costs between $40 and $50, depending on where you purchase them. While this may seem expensive, many golfers find that the performance of the Z Star is worth the extra cost.

As a mid-range golf ball, the Srixon Q Star is a great option for golfers who want a balance of distance and control. It is designed to provide a soft feel and low spin off the tee, while still delivering enough spin and control around the greens.

The Srixon Q Star features a 338 Speed Dimple pattern that reduces drag for a more penetrating ball flight. It also has a soft, thin cover made of urethane that provides a great feel and increased greenside spin. The ball is designed for moderate swing speeds, with a compression rating of 72.

One of the key features of the Q Star is its Spin Skin technology, which is a soft, elastic coating that increases friction between the ball and clubface. This results in more spin on approach shots and better control around the greens.

Overall, the Srixon Q Star is a great option for golfers who want a ball that is easy to control and provides a soft feel. It is also a good choice for those with moderate swing speeds who want to maximize their distance without sacrificing control.

The Srixon Q Star is priced in the mid-range for golf balls, with a suggested retail price of $29.99 per dozen. This makes it a great value for golfers who want a high-quality ball without breaking the bank.

Design and Performance Comparison

When comparing the Srixon Z Star vs Q Star Tour, it’s important to note that both golf balls are designed to perform well for different types of golfers. The Srixon Z Star is designed for players with high swing speeds, while the Q Star Tour is designed for players with moderate to slightly slower swing speeds.

The Srixon Z Star features a soft feel and urethane cover that provides more greenside spin and a premium ball experience. On the other hand, the Q Star Tour features a softer ball feel and a spin skin coating that provides more spin on approach shots.

Both the Z Star and Q Star Tour are tour level golf balls, but the Z Star is better suited for players with high swing speeds, while the Q Star Tour is better suited for players with moderate to slightly slower swing speeds. The Z Star XV is also a great option for players with fast swing speeds who want a distance ball.

Price Comparison

When it comes to price, the Srixon Z Star is slightly more expensive than the Q Star Tour. However, both golf balls are priced similarly to other premium golf balls on the market.

For most golfers, the price difference between the Z Star and Q Star Tour is not significant enough to make a difference in their decision. However, for those who are on a budget or looking to save some money, the Q Star Tour may be a better option.

Both the Srixon Z Star and Q Star Tour are great golf balls that perform well for different types of golfers. The Z Star is better suited for players with high swing speeds who want more greenside spin and a premium ball experience, while the Q Star Tour is better suited for players with moderate to slightly slower swing speeds who want more spin on approach shots.

After comparing the Srixon Z Star vs Q Star Tour, it’s clear that both golf balls offer exceptional performance and quality.

For those with high swing speeds, the Srixon Z Star may be the better option due to its higher compression and ability to generate more spin. However, the Srixon Q Star Tour is a great choice for those with moderate swing speeds who want a softer feel and more greenside spin.

Ultimately, the decision between the two golf balls comes down to personal preference and playing style. Both the Z Star and Q Star Tour are excellent choices for mid to low handicappers looking for a premium ball with great performance.

It’s important to note that while the Srixon Z Star and Q Star Tour are both tour-level golf balls, they are designed for different types of golfers. Those with faster swing speeds may benefit more from the Z Star, while those with slower swing speeds may prefer the Q Star Tour.

Overall, Srixon golf balls are known for their exceptional quality and performance. Whether you choose the Z Star, Q Star Tour, or another Srixon ball, you can be confident that you’re playing with one of the best golf balls on the market.

• Recent Posts

• Should Tee Boxes Be Level? - January 23, 2024
• 3 Hybrid Distance - November 15, 2023
• Innovations in Golf Mobility: An In-depth Review of Top Golf Scooters - October 12, 2023

Wells Fargo Championship

Quail Hollow Club

Srixon Z-Star Divide: What you need to know

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW: The Srixon Z-Star Divide golf ball brings the two-tone visuals introduced last year in its Q-Star Tour Divide to its tour-level multilayer urethane cover balls.

PRICE: $45 per dozen.

THE DEEP DIVE: To some it may look like a toy or perhaps a castaway from a Myrtle Beach Treasure Island miniature golf course. Even some historians might recall it as reminiscent of the Ping Eye1 and Eye2 golf balls of the 1970s, '80s and '90s. But that would be completely missing the point behind the new Srixon Z-Star Divide golf balls.

Building on the success of last year’s introduction of the two-tone, split-hemisphere colored Q-Star Tour Divide, Srixon is bringing that same visual look to its highest tech and highest performing models. The Z-Star and Z-Star XV are aimed at the best players, including last week’s Sony Open winner and defending Masters champion Hideki Matsuyama . Both feature the thinnest urethane covers in the company’s line (0.6 and 0.5 millimeters, respectively) and both utilize a special cover coating (called “SpinSkin”) that improves the chemical bonds of the cover material, making it more flexible so it provides more grab in the grooves on short shots for extra spin. Beneath the cover, both balls bake in extra firmness at the outer edges (XV uses a dual-core construction) for more resilience and greater initial ball speed.

Of course, while all that’s inside the Z-Star Divide and Z-Star XV Divide is the same as the original white (and yellow) versions introduced last year, it’s mixing the white and yellow covers on the same ball in the two-tone model that’s getting all the attention. Not merely a cosmetic trick, though, the split hemispheres of yellow and white provide a perfect visual dividing line for aiming putts. The split color pattern is attractive for other reasons, too, said Brian Schielke, Srixon North America general manager.

“They’re so easy to see flying through the air, and give great visual feedback on pitches and chips around the green,” he said.

The Z-Star Divide is designed for swing speeds over 90 mph and has the higher greenside spin of the two models. The Z-Star XV Divide features a mid-high launch and is designed for swing speeds over 100 miles per hour.

The Z-Star Divide and Z-Star XV Divide will be in stores Jan. 21.

More from Golf Digest

Trending now.

Winner's bag: Taylor Pendrith's clubs at the 2024 CJ Cup Byron Nelson

T aylor Pendrith won his first PGA Tour title at the CJ Cup Byron Nelson with some strong play - and a miss from Ben Kohles on the final hole. The victory came with a mixed bag of equipment featuring Ping, Srixon, Cleveland and Odyssey clubs.

Take a closer look at Pendrith’s gear setup below.

Driver: Ping G430 LST ( Accra TZ6 shaft), 9 degrees

Ping G430 LST Custom Driver

3-wood: Ping G430 Max (Project X HZRDUS Smoke Green 80 6.5TX shaft), 15 degrees

5-wood: Ping G425 Max (Project X HZRDUS Smoke Green 90 6.5TX shaft), 20.5 degrees

Irons: Srixon ZX5 MKII (4-5; True Temper Dynamic Gold Tour Issue X100 shafts), Srixon ZX7 MKII (4-9; True Temper Dynamic Gold Tour Issue X100 shafts)

Srixon ZX5 MK II Custom Irons

Srixon zx7 mk ii custom irons.

Wedges: Cleveland RTX 6 Tour Rack (46-10 Mid, 52-10 Mid, 56-10 Mid and 60-9 Full degrees; True Temper Dynamic Gold Tour Issue X100 shafts)

Putter: Odyssey Jailbird Versa 380 CS (SuperStroke Zenergy Flatso 1.0 shaft)

Ball: Srixon Z-Star Diamond

Srixon Z-STAR DIAMOND 2023 Golf Balls

Grips: Golf Pride New Decade Multi-Compound

Golf Pride Multi-Compound Plus 4

Want to overhaul your bag for 2024?  Find a fitting location near you at True Spec Golf .

The post Winner’s bag: Taylor Pendrith’s clubs at the 2024 CJ Cup Byron Nelson appeared first on Golf .

Srixon Z-Star vs Srixon Z-Star XV Golf Balls: Read Our Head-To-Head Verdict

We compare two of the best golf ball offerings from Srixon and find out which one is best for your game

• Sign up to Golf Monthly Newsletter Newsletter

Which ball should you choose?

A superb premium offering from Srixon, the Z-Star produces a penetrating ball flight on long shots and excellent stopping power on and around the greens.

• Impressive long game performance
• Excellent greenside spin and control
• Great value at its price point
• Performs well in the wind
• Overall solid performer
• Might not be the best fit for low-launch players

The Z-Star XV is a superb premium golf ball. It will appeal to higher swing speed players who want distance off the tee without compromising on feel around the green.

• Impressive distance
• Strong ball flight
• Excellent feel and short game control
• Only faster swing players will reap maximum benefits

'Built for champions' is the slogan that is printed on Srixon's website and, considering some of the illustrious names that use Srixon products, that might be a fair assessment of the high-quality golf equipment the brand produces.

Some of those golfers include the likes of 2019 Open champion Shane Lowry and 2021 Masters champion Hideki Matsuyama , who both use Srixon Z-Star XV golf balls . Meanwhile, on the LPGA Tour, 2022 US Open champion Minjee Lee and four-time Major winner Inbee Park both use the Z-Star golf balls .  

Srixon are known for producing some of the best golf balls in the game and are renowned for designing and building great value equipment, from Tour professionals to beginner golfers. However, it's the brands Z-Star and Z-Star XV golf balls that we are interested in for this piece, as both deliver excellent distances off the tee, superb greenside control and offer great value for money compared to other premium golf balls on the market. 

But how do they stack up against each other? Well, we've put together a comparison of both golf balls, looking at everything from their aesthetics to their feel, to see which one might be best for your needs as a golfer. 

Aesthetically, there isn't much separating these two golf balls with both featuring 338 hexagonal speed dimples designed to help them zip through the air after you've struck them. Both also come in a yellow colorway, which means they are an excellent ball for anyone looking to play through the winter months . They also feature a handy alignment line that spells out the name of each golf ball on its side. 

Feel is perhaps one of the most important things to look out for when buying a new pack of golf balls, as it can affect how well you connect with your golf shot. The Z-Star is the lower compression of the two models, with a compression rating of 90, so it comes out as one of the softest feeling golf balls on the market . Its three-piece urethane shell also helps to deliver an exceptional feel and offers superior greenside control.   

Although the Z-Star XV is still a soft golf ball, it has a higher compression rating of 102, as well as a four-piece shell and a slightly firmer feel than the Z-Star. While that does mean it offers a little less control around the greens, it makes up for it in length, as it is one of the best golf balls for distance . 

Get the Golf Monthly Newsletter

Subscribe to the Golf Monthly newsletter to stay up to date with all the latest tour news, equipment news, reviews, head-to-heads and buyer’s guides from our team of experienced experts.

Overall, the Z-Star XV is the better option for golfers with faster swing speeds, whilst the softer Z-Star is better for players with more moderate swing speeds. 

Beginning with the Z-Star, which provides an excellent mid-flight that penetrates through the air to deliver great distances off the tee. While it doesn't offer the same level of distance as the Z-Star XV, in testing, we found it easier to get off the ground and it didn't fall out of the sky on our longer shots. 

While the XV carries further and has a higher flight than the Z-Star, both options produce strong ball flights thanks to the 338 dimple pattern on their casing. Srixon says that they have made these dimples deeper than any other ball in their range in a bid to produce lower ball flights that pierce through the air.  

The Srixon Z-Star is designed more for players with higher swing speeds

That claim, we thought, is true, as both golf balls zip through the air extremely well, with the XV, in particular, performing admirably on a windy day on the course. What's more, as it delivers more distance off the tee, the XV offers a mid-high ball flight from the driver. It also didn't balloon as much as you'd expect from a mid-flight golf ball, but maintained a stable and true path through the air.

As these are both Tour-level golf balls, they offer excellent yardages off the tee and in the long iron department. Featuring a FastLayer inner core that is soft in the center, but is firmer towards its edges, the Z-Star helps to improve ball speed and keep spin low. We were impressed with the distances this ball offered, especially considering its soft casing. 

As mentioned earlier though, the XV carries further than the Z-Star. This is thanks to its higher compression, four-piece casing and its reformulated FastLayer core. That core is designed to deliver a 'faster snap' off the clubface and it certainly lived up to the billing in testing, as we were highly impressed at how fast the ball traveled off the face of our driver.  

While both are premium balls that offer excellent spin and control around the greens, the Z-Star edges it here in terms of control. As it has the slightly thicker core of the two, we found it delivers excellent control and stopping power around the greens, making it a great option for anyone looking to improve on their pitching or chipping game. 

Srixon's Spin Skin layer is designed to help the ball bite into the grooves of your wedges

If you were to look at the normal Z-Star, you would find Srixon's Spin Skin layer, which has also been incorporated to the XV. This layer is added to the thermoplastic urethane layer of the ball and is designed to help the ball bite into the grooves of your wedges to improve the amount of spin you're getting on the ball.

As mentioned, the Z-Star XV offers slightly less control around the greens than the Z-Star, but as you'd expect from a Tour quality golf ball, we were still impressed by how much it grabbed and held the greens when we connected well with our wedges. 

You should choose the Srixon Z-Star if...

- You have a moderate swing speed and are looking to get the ball off the ground more easily

- You're looking for a durable, premium golf ball for excellent value

- You want to improve your greenside control

You should choose the Srixon Z-Star XV if...

- You can generate fast club head speeds

- You're looking to add more distance to your golf game

- You prefer to use a softer feeling golf ball 

A golfer for most of his life, Sam is Golf Monthly's E-commerce Editor.

Working with golf gear and equipment over the last six years, Sam has quickly built outstanding knowledge and expertise on golf products ranging from drivers, to balls, to shoes. 

He combines this knowledge with a passion for helping golfers get the best gear for them, and as such Sam manages a team of writers that look to deliver the most accurate and informative reviews and buying advice. This takes the form of buying guides, reviews, supporting gear content as well as creating deal content.

This is so the reader can find exactly what they are looking for, at a good price.

Sam now spends most of his time testing and looking after golf gear content for the website, whilst he is also responsible for all content related to golf apparel. 

Additionally Sam oversees Golf Monthly voucher/coupon content which seeks to find you the best offers and promotions from well-known brands like Callaway, TaylorMade and many more.

Unfortunately, Sam is not a member of any club at the moment but regularly gets out on the golf course to keep up the facade of having a single-figure handicap. 

Sam's What's In The Bag: 

Driver: Cobra LTDxLS (9 degrees) 

Fairway Wood: Ping G430 Max (15 degrees), Nike Covert Tour 2.0 (19 degrees) 

Irons (4-PW): Titleist AP2 

Wedges: Titleist Vokey SM7 54˚, 58˚ 

Putter: Scotty Cameron Phantom X 5.5  

Ball: Srixon Z-Star Diamond

Shoes: G/FORE Gallivanter / Nike Air Zoom Victory Tour 3 / Cuater The Ringer (For off the course he goes for Nike Jordan 1 Low G shoes as well)

• Ed Carruthers Writer

A review of the Srixon Z-Star & Z-Star XV balls

By Neil Tappin Published 17 May 11

Jordan Spieth will have his latest Grand Slam effort at next week's PGA Championship - but is still dealing with a nagging wrist issue

By Ben Fleming Published 11 May 24

The four-time Major winner also claimed that he hopes a deal can be struck between the PGA Tour and Public Investment Fund who back the LIV Golf League

By Matt Cradock Published 11 May 24

• Contact Future's experts
• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Accessibility statement
• Cookies policy
• Advertise with us

Golf Monthly is part of Future plc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site . © Future Publishing Limited Quay House, The Ambury, Bath BA1 1UA. All rights reserved. England and Wales company registration number 2008885.

• Bahasa Indonesia
• Eastern Europe
• Moscow Oblast

Elektrostal

Elektrostal Localisation : Country Russia , Oblast Moscow Oblast . Available Information : Geographical coordinates , Population, Area, Altitude, Weather and Hotel . Nearby cities and villages : Noginsk , Pavlovsky Posad and Staraya Kupavna .

Information

Find all the information of Elektrostal or click on the section of your choice in the left menu.

• Update data

Elektrostal Demography

Information on the people and the population of Elektrostal.

Elektrostal Geography

Geographic Information regarding City of Elektrostal .

Elektrostal Distance

Distance (in kilometers) between Elektrostal and the biggest cities of Russia.

Elektrostal Map

Locate simply the city of Elektrostal through the card, map and satellite image of the city.

Elektrostal Nearby cities and villages

Elektrostal weather.

Weather forecast for the next coming days and current time of Elektrostal.

Elektrostal Sunrise and sunset

Find below the times of sunrise and sunset calculated 7 days to Elektrostal.

Elektrostal Hotel

Our team has selected for you a list of hotel in Elektrostal classified by value for money. Book your hotel room at the best price.

Elektrostal Nearby

Below is a list of activities and point of interest in Elektrostal and its surroundings.

Elektrostal Page

• Information /Russian-Federation--Moscow-Oblast--Elektrostal#info
• Demography /Russian-Federation--Moscow-Oblast--Elektrostal#demo
• Geography /Russian-Federation--Moscow-Oblast--Elektrostal#geo
• Distance /Russian-Federation--Moscow-Oblast--Elektrostal#dist1
• Map /Russian-Federation--Moscow-Oblast--Elektrostal#map
• Nearby cities and villages /Russian-Federation--Moscow-Oblast--Elektrostal#dist2
• Weather /Russian-Federation--Moscow-Oblast--Elektrostal#weather
• Sunrise and sunset /Russian-Federation--Moscow-Oblast--Elektrostal#sun
• Hotel /Russian-Federation--Moscow-Oblast--Elektrostal#hotel
• Nearby /Russian-Federation--Moscow-Oblast--Elektrostal#around
• Page /Russian-Federation--Moscow-Oblast--Elektrostal#page
• Terms of Use
• Copyright © 2024 DB-City - All rights reserved
• Change Ad Consent Do not sell my data