videos de journey when you love a woman

When You Love a Woman

More By Journey

Select a country or region

Africa, middle east, and india.

Côte d’Ivoire
Congo, The Democratic Republic Of The
Guinea-Bissau
Niger (English)
Congo, Republic of
Saudi Arabia
Sierra Leone
South Africa
Tanzania, United Republic Of
Turkmenistan
United Arab Emirates

Asia Pacific

Indonesia (English)
Lao People's Democratic Republic
Malaysia (English)
Micronesia, Federated States of
New Zealand
Papua New Guinea
Philippines
Solomon Islands
Bosnia and Herzegovina
France (Français)
Deutschland
Luxembourg (English)
Moldova, Republic Of
North Macedonia
Portugal (Português)
Türkiye (English)
United Kingdom

Latin America and the Caribbean

Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina (Español)
Bolivia (Español)
Virgin Islands, British
Cayman Islands
Chile (Español)
Colombia (Español)
Costa Rica (Español)
República Dominicana
Ecuador (Español)
El Salvador (Español)
Guatemala (Español)
Honduras (Español)
Nicaragua (Español)
Paraguay (Español)
St. Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
St. Vincent and The Grenadines
Trinidad and Tobago
Turks and Caicos
Uruguay (English)
Venezuela (Español)

The United States and Canada

Canada (English)
Canada (Français)
United States
Estados Unidos (Español México)
الولايات المتحدة
États-Unis (Français France)
Estados Unidos (Português Brasil)
美國 (繁體中文台灣)

an image, when javascript is unavailable

Flashback: Journey and Steve Perry Reunite for ‘When You Love a Woman’

By Andy Greene

Andy Greene

Journey’s 1996 LP Trial by Fire was supposed to be beginning of a whole new chapter for the San Francisco soft rock band. They hadn’t worked together during the past ten years, a difficult time when frontman Steve Perry largely disappeared from the public eye and guitarist Neal Schon and keyboardist Jonathan Cain found minor success with their new supergroup Bad English. But in 1994, Perry returned with the new solo album For the Love of Strange Medicine , which he supported with a brief tour. When it wrapped, he phoned up Journey and said he was ready to finally make new music again.

The first anyone heard of the album was the kickoff single “When You Love a Woman,” which hit radio in July of 1996. It was a radically different pop landscape than the one they left 10 years earlier, with “Macarena” topping the charts alongside hits by Jewel, Alanis Morissette and Bone Thugs-N-Harmony. The song still managed to connect with audiences hungry for Journey and it reached Number 12 on the Hot 100, setting the album up very nicely for a Number Three debut on the album chart a few months later. This was the era of the mega-reunion tour with Kiss, Page & Plant and the Eagles all making a fortune on the road flogging their oldies, but Journey managed to one-up them by having a new hit. It even won a Grammy for Best Pop Performance by a Duo or Group.

Billie Eilish Would Like to Reintroduce Herself

Kristi noem describes executing puppy she 'hated' in new book, kanye west announces 'yeezy porn' amid reports of adult film company, billie eilish, lorde, green day among artists to sign letter in support of ticketing reform act.

The obvious next move was to hit the road and start raking in millions. They signed Irving Azoff as their manager, the best-equipped person on the planet to make that happen. Everything was coming together when Steve Perry injured his hip on a hike in Hawaii. The group grew incredibly frustrated as he kept delaying a decision about whether or not to get hip replacement surgery. Meanwhile, the album was falling down the charts and they were losing a lot of hard-earned momentum. Perry felt pressured to make a very difficult medical decision, and the situation quickly got ugly. In 1998, the group couldn’t wait a minute longer and made the choice to hit the road with replacement singer Steve Augeri.

Journey wouldn’t stand on stage with Steve Perry again until the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame induction ceremony last week . Even that occasion wasn’t enough to get him to actually sing with them, meaning that Trial by Fire remains the last time they made music together. Check out the “When You Love a Woman” video to see the final gasp of Perry-era Journey.

Eric Church's 2024 Stagecoach Performance Was a Helluva Thing to Witness

Desert Drama
By Joseph Hudak

Jelly Roll Shines During Stagecoach Performance

Stagecoach 2024
By Tomás Mier

Jelly Roll Shares Toby Keith Cover Ahead of Stagecoach Debut

By Daniel Kreps

Lana Del Rey Joins Paul Cauthen for 'Unchained Melody' Duet at Stagecoach

By Charisma Madarang

Fans Think Bad Bunny's Verse On Myke Towers' New Song 'Adivino' Is About Kendall Jenner

guessing game
By Julyssa Lopez

Most Popular

Anne hathaway says 'gross' chemistry test in the 2000s required her to make out with 10 guys: that's the 'worst way to do it' and 'now we know better', 'the lord of the rings' trilogy returning to theaters, remastered and extended, louvre considers moving mona lisa to underground chamber to end 'public disappointment', sources claim hugh jackman’s worrying behavior may have something to do with his breakup, you might also like, animated vr anthology ‘blue figures’ brings jazz greats to life, victoria justice shimmers in sequins at latin american music awards in dazzling cutout dress, the best yoga mats for any practice, according to instructors, ‘what’s the matter with helen’ is a quotable midnight movie ritual made for two, vince mcmahon lists final tko shares for sale.

Verify it's you

Please log in.

Journey’s Heartfelt Ballad: When a Classic Band Loves a Woman

Exploring the Depths of Journey’s Emotional Ballad

Dive into the emotional depths of journey’s timeless power ballad, “when you love a woman,” and explore its heart-rending impact on fans and music icons alike..

Journey, the classic American rock band formed in 1973, is best known for their powerful ballads and timeless anthems. With a lineup that has evolved over time, key members of the band include Neal Schon ( guitar ), Ross Valory (bass), Steve Smith (drums), Jonathan Cain (keyboards), and none other than the iconic Steve Perry ( vocals ). Though Perry left the band in 1998 and was replaced by several vocalists throughout the years, he remains an essential part of the band’s formative period and is often remembered for his soaring vocal performances.

“When You Love a Woman,” released in 1996 as a part of the band’s album “Trial by Fire,” is a prime example of Journey’s mastery in crafting emotional ballads. The song’s deep message, coupled with Perry’s unmistakable voice, creates a heart-rending experience for listeners. The power ballad explores the essence of love and the intricacies of relationships, delving into the importance of trust and understanding.

The track’s success was undeniable, earning a Grammy Award nomination for Best Pop Performance by a Duo or Group with Vocals in 1997. This well-deserved recognition elevated the band’s status even further in the realm of rock music.

However, one can’t help but point out that Journey’s reliance on power ballads has caused a sense of predictability in their music over time. While tracks like “When You Love a Woman” showcase the band’s expertise in crafting emotional songs, it is hard to ignore the similarities in structure and theme to other famous Journey ballads like “Open Arms” and “Faithfully.” This lack of experimentation has been a topic of critique among music aficionados, but it doesn’t take away from the undeniable impact of the band’s music on millions of fans.

Nonetheless, the band’s impressive catalog of award-winning songs and countless live performances have secured Journey’s legacy as rock legends. “When You Love a Woman” stands as a testament to the band’s ability to create a soul-stirring connection with their audience, and will undoubtedly continue to resonate with fans and music lovers alike for years to come.

Charting the Journey of a Love Anthem

Journey’s “when you love a woman”: a powerful love anthem that climbed charts and captured hearts, leaving an indelible mark on music history..

“When You Love a Woman” by Journey was released on October 2, 1996, as the lead single from their tenth album, “Trial by Fire”. The song quickly gained traction and made its way to the Billboard charts, showcasing the band’s signature sound and powerful balladry.

Upon its initial release, the song entered the Billboard Hot 100 chart at position #68, a respectable start for a rock ballad making its way into the mainstream. It didn’t take long for the song to climb the charts, reaching its peak position of #12 on December 7, 1996. Though it may not have reached the pinnacle of the chart, its impact as a love anthem was undeniable.

Journey’s “When You Love a Woman” also achieved significant success on the Billboard Adult Contemporary chart, where it climbed to the #1 spot on November 23, 1996. The song held onto the top position for four consecutive weeks, solidifying its place as a beloved ballad in the hearts of listeners.

Beyond the United States, “When You Love a Woman” also found success in other countries. In Canada, the song peaked at #5 on the RPM Top Singles chart and held a position in the Top 50 for an impressive 17 weeks. Across the Atlantic, the song reached #74 on the UK Singles Chart, demonstrating its worldwide appeal.

Adding to the accolades of this powerful love song, “When You Love a Woman” was nominated for a Grammy Award in 1997 in the category of Best Pop Performance by a Duo or Group with Vocals. Though it didn’t take home the trophy, the nomination further solidified the song’s place in history as a standout track from Journey’s impressive discography.

In conclusion, Journey’s “When You Love a Woman” may not have achieved the chart-topping success of some of the band’s previous hits, but it left an indelible mark on the music world. Its powerful lyrics, emotive vocals, and memorable melody have cemented it as a timeless love anthem, forever ingrained in the hearts of music lovers everywhere.

Delving Into the Soul-Stirring Lyrics

When you love a woman You see your world inside her eyes When you love a woman You know she’s standing by your side A joy that lasts forever There’s a band of gold that shines waiting somewhere, oh yeah

If you think I’m feeling lonely And you know I love you only Show the world how much you care Give me strength when I feel scared

It’s enough to make you cry When you see her walking by And you look into her eyes

Let’s dive into the profound lyrics of the song “When You Love a Woman” by Journey. The song was released in 1996 as part of their album “Trial by Fire” and became one of their most memorable and touching ballads. The lyrics take us on a journey of love, emotion, and commitment, reflecting the spirit of the time.

The 90s was a time when society was going through a significant shift. It was a decade of hope, with people seeking love, peace, and compassion. The lyrics perfectly capture the essence of the era, emphasizing the importance of love and companionship. The song describes what it feels like to be truly in love with a woman, as one can see their world in her eyes and feel the unwavering support by their side.

The song also touches upon the idea of showing love and care in times of need, giving strength to the beloved when they feel scared. This sense of support and connection forged a bond between people in the 90s, as they navigated the changing landscape of the world together.

Another notable aspect of the song is its powerful, soul-stirring effect. The beautiful imagery of a “band of gold that shines waiting somewhere” symbolizes a lasting and eternal love that can bring joy and happiness. The lyrics evoke a sense of longing and tenderness, creating an emotional resonance with the listener.

In conclusion, the lyrics of “When You Love a Woman” by Journey encapsulate the spirit of the 90s, capturing the essence of love, compassion, and togetherness. The song’s heartfelt message remains relevant and powerful, even today, as it continues to inspire and move its listeners.

When You Love a Woman: The Music Video That Captured Our Hearts

Journey’s ’96 classic “when you love a woman” music video: a timeless blend of emotion and visual artistry that still captures hearts today..

Journey’s “When You Love a Woman” music video, directed by the talented Wayne Isham, is a perfect blend of emotion, storytelling, and visual artistry that fully complements the powerful ballad. The video was released in 1996 and has since become one of Journey’s most iconic and well-loved music videos.

Wayne Isham, the director behind the video, has been praised for his artistic vision and cinematic approach to music videos. With a career spanning over three decades, Isham is no stranger to the music scene having directed videos for artists such as Bon Jovi, Metallica, and Britney Spears. Isham’s experience in the industry is clearly evident in the “When You Love a Woman” video, as he manages to bring out the profound emotions embedded within the song through visual storytelling.

The music video features the band members performing in a dimly lit room, with lead singer Steve Perry passionately serenading the audience. Interspersed with the performance scenes are beautifully shot sequences featuring a love story between a man and a woman, played by actors Shaun Baker and Victoria Rowell. The narrative takes us through the ups and downs of their relationship, mirroring the emotional intensity of the song’s lyrics.

The production details for the music video showcase the meticulous attention given to creating an atmosphere that evokes romance and heartfelt emotions. Soft lighting, a carefully curated color palette, and close-up shots of the actors’ expressions work together seamlessly to heighten the emotions portrayed in the video. Additionally, the overall aesthetic of the video gives it a timeless quality that still resonates with viewers today.

“When You Love a Woman” may not have had an astronomical budget, but the creative team behind the video made the most of their resources to craft a visual masterpiece that has stood the test of time. The music video has garnered millions of views on YouTube, and its impact on Journey’s fans can be seen through the numerous tribute videos and covers that have been uploaded over the years. This powerful ballad, coupled with its evocative music video, has undoubtedly made a lasting impression on the hearts of music lovers around the world.

The Mastermind Composer: Jonathan Cain

Diving deeper into the heart of “When You Love a Woman,” it’s essential to shine a light on the brilliant composer behind the song, Jonathan Cain. As a gifted keyboardist and lyricist, Cain joined Journey in 1980 and became an indispensable part of the band’s signature sound. His unique songwriting talent led to the creation of many of Journey’s greatest hits, such as “Don’t Stop Believin’,” “Open Arms,” and “Faithfully.” Cain’s longstanding collaboration with Journey’s other members, particularly Neal Schon and Steve Perry, has yielded some of rock music’s most unforgettable anthems. With a keen ear for melody and an uncanny ability to convey deep emotions through his lyrics, Jonathan Cain has undoubtedly cemented his legacy as one of the most accomplished composers in the realm of classic rock.

Accolades, Appearances, and Covers

“when you love a woman”: a timeless journey classic, enchanting fans with soulful melodies and endless accolades, media appearances, and heartfelt covers since 1996..

“When You Love a Woman” has been lauded for its engaging melody and soulful lyrics ever since its release in 1996. The song’s timeless appeal is evidenced by the accolades and recognition it has garnered over the years. For instance, the track was nominated for a Grammy Award in the category of Best Pop Performance by a Duo or Group with Vocals. While it didn’t clinch the award, the nomination itself is a testament to the song’s quality and the lasting impact it has had on fans and the music industry.

The enchanting ballad has also made its presence felt in various forms of media, adding to its fame and popularity. It was featured in the movie “Trial by Fire: The Making of Journey’s Trial by Fire” (1996), which chronicled the making of Journey’s album “Trial by Fire” that same year. Furthermore, the song has been included in TV shows such as “American Idol” and “So You Think You Can Dance” as contestants often perform their renditions of the tune, showcasing the versatility of “When You Love a Woman” in resonating with different audiences.

As the song has continued to be a favorite among music enthusiasts, it’s no surprise that it has been covered by numerous artists over the years, spanning various genres and styles. These covers only add to the rich tapestry of interpretations and adaptations of the beloved track. Some notable covers include performances by Filipino singer Arnel Pineda, who later became Journey’s lead vocalist, as well as up-and-coming musicians on online platforms such as YouTube, where thousands of fans share their own interpretations of the song.

In summary, the enduring allure of “When You Love a Woman” is undeniable. With its Grammy nomination, appearances in movies and TV shows, and the multitude of covers that have been produced since its release, the song remains a cornerstone of Journey’s musical legacy and a testament to the band’s ability to create captivating and memorable music.

Breaking Down the Musical Components

“When You Love a Woman” showcases Journey’s exceptional musicianship and songwriting prowess. The song is composed in the key of D major, which lends itself to an uplifting and hopeful tonality. The harmonic progression follows a standard I-IV-V structure, with the iconic chorus consisting of a sequence of D major, G major, and A major chords. This progression provides a strong foundation for the emotionally charged vocals and powerful guitar work.

The tempo of the song is set at a moderate pace of approximately 67 beats per minute, which allows the track to maintain a sense of urgency without sacrificing the emotional depth and vulnerability that pervades the lyrics. This tempo also supports the intricate guitar solos and melodic embellishments that are characteristic of Journey’s style.

One standout feature of “When You Love a Woman” is its use of dynamic contrasts throughout the arrangement. The song begins with a gentle piano intro that gradually builds in intensity, leading to the first verse. The verses showcase a more subdued and intimate delivery from vocalist Steve Perry, while the pre-chorus and chorus sections explode with soaring harmonies and rich, layered instrumentation. This ebb and flow of dynamics serves to heighten the emotional impact of the song, drawing the listener in and keeping them engaged throughout the track’s runtime.

Another noteworthy aspect of the song is the use of guitar harmonics by Neal Schon, Journey’s lead guitarist. These delicate, bell-like tones add an ethereal quality to the track and serve to accentuate key moments within the song’s structure. Schon’s masterful use of harmonics, combined with his signature melodic soloing style, adds depth and complexity to the arrangement, setting “When You Love a Woman” apart from other power ballads of the era.

In terms of production, “When You Love a Woman” benefits from a polished and balanced mix that allows each element of the arrangement to shine. The blending of Steve Perry’s emotive vocals with the band’s tight and expressive musicianship creates a sonic landscape that is both expansive and intimate. This careful attention to detail, along with the song’s memorable melody and heartfelt lyricism, has solidified “When You Love a Woman” as a timeless classic in Journey’s diverse catalog.

Red, Red Romance: UB40’s Classic Take on “Can’t Help Falling in Love”

Red, Red Romance: UB40's Classic Take on "Can't Help Falling in Love" UB40's Timeless Take on a Classic Ballad UB40 revitalizes Elvis' classic "Can't Help…

Saturday Night Fever: A Deep Dive into The Bay City Rollers’ Iconic Anthem

Saturday Night Fever: A Deep Dive into The Bay City Rollers' Iconic Anthem Revisiting Rollermania with the Bay City Rollers "Relive the tartan-clad craze of…

Desert Echoes: The Timeless Journey of Camel’s ‘Rajaz’

Camel | Rajaz Welcome to a musical odyssey that transcends the boundaries of progressive rock to embrace the mystical allure of the desert. In this…

Unraveling the Magic of ELO’s Timeless Classic: A Deep Dive into “Telephone Line”

Unraveling the Magic of ELO's Timeless Classic: A Deep Dive into "Telephone Line" The Calling of a Classic: ELO's Timeless Tune ELO's "Telephone Line" masterfully…

Exploring the Sonic Explosion: Unraveling the Story Behind Charli XCX’s “Boom Clap”

Exploring the Sonic Explosion: Unraveling the Story Behind Charli XCX's "Boom Clap" Exploring Charli XCX's Journey to Chart-Topping Success "Charli XCX: Defying genres and smashing…

Boston’s “Peace of Mind”: A Pioneering Classic Rock Anthem That Still Resonates Today

Boston's "Peace of Mind": A Pioneering Classic Rock Anthem That Still Resonates Today Discovering Serenity with Boston's Timeless Classic Embark on a timeless journey to…

“When You Love a Woman” by Journey: Lyrics, Meaning, and Song Analysis

Music has a unique way of touching our souls, evoking emotions, and resonating with our personal experiences. One such song that has captivated audiences for decades is “When You Love a Woman” by Journey. This article delves into the lyrics, meaning, and song analysis to unravel the beauty and depth of this timeless classic.

Background of Journey

Journey, an American rock band formed in 1973, has been a powerhouse in the music industry. With their distinctive sound blending rock, pop, and progressive elements, they have garnered a massive fan following worldwide. Over the years, the band has undergone several lineup changes but continues to produce music that transcends generations.

Overview of “When You Love a Woman”

“When You Love a Woman” was released in 1996 as part of Journey’s album “Trial by Fire.” The song quickly climbed the charts, becoming a massive hit and earning accolades from both critics and fans alike. Its heartfelt lyrics and soulful melody struck a chord with listeners, cementing its place as one of Journey’s most iconic tracks.

Lyrics Analysis

In my life I see where I’ve been I said that I’d never fall again Within myself I was wrong My searching ain’t over and over I know that

When you love a woman You see your world inside her eyes When you love a woman (Well) You know she’s standing by your side A joy that lasts forever There’s a band of gold that shines Waiting somewhere, oh, yeah

If I can’t believe that someone is true To fall in love is so hard to do I hope and pray tonight Somewhere you’re thinking of me girl Yes I know, I know that

It’s enough to make you cry When you see her walking by And you look into her eyes

When you love a woman When you love, love, love, love When you love a woman You see your world inside her eyes

The lyrics of “When You Love a Woman” paint a vivid picture of love, vulnerability, and commitment. Each verse and chorus is filled with profound insights into the complexities of relationships. Key themes such as trust, understanding, and unconditional love are woven seamlessly throughout the song, making it relatable to audiences of all ages.

Musical Composition

Musically, “When You Love a Woman” is a masterpiece. The soft piano melodies, soaring guitar solos, and soulful vocals create a mesmerizing atmosphere that complements the lyrics perfectly. The arrangement is meticulously crafted, allowing each instrument to shine while maintaining a cohesive and harmonious sound.

Deep Dive into the Meaning

At its core, “When You Love a Woman” is a testament to the power of love and the lengths one would go to protect and cherish it. The lyrics delve into the joys and challenges of being in a relationship, highlighting the importance of communication, patience, and understanding. The song captures the essence of true love, making listeners reflect on their own experiences and emotions.

Cultural Impact

The impact of “When You Love a Woman” extends beyond the music charts. It has been featured in numerous films, TV shows, and commercials, further solidifying its status as a cultural phenomenon. The song’s universal themes and timeless appeal continue to resonate with audiences, making it a favorite among fans and newcomers alike.

Critical Reception

Critics and fans alike have showered “When You Love a Woman” with praise since its release. Many have lauded its poignant lyrics, impeccable musical arrangement, and heartfelt vocals. The song’s ability to evoke strong emotions and connect with listeners on a personal level has earned it a place in music history.

Legacy of the Song

Over the years, “When You Love a Woman” has stood the test of time, remaining as relevant and impactful as ever. Its enduring popularity has led to numerous covers and tributes by other artists, further showcasing its influence and staying power in the music industry.

“When You Love a Woman” by Journey is more than just a song; it’s a timeless ode to love, understanding, and commitment. Through its heartfelt lyrics, soulful melody, and universal themes, it continues to captivate audiences and touch hearts around the world. Whether you’re a longtime fan or discovering it for the first time, this classic track is sure to leave a lasting impression.

“When You Love a Woman” by Journey: Lyrics, Meaning, and Song Analysis FAQs

“When You Love a Woman” is from Journey’s album “Trial by Fire,” released in 1996.
The song was written by Jonathan Cain, Steve Perry, and Neal Schon.
While the song has received critical acclaim, it has not won any major awards.
Yes, Journey released a music video for the song featuring the band performing and scenes depicting love and relationships.
Several artists have covered “When You Love a Woman,” showcasing its enduring popularity and influence in the music industry.

“When You Love a Woman” by Journey: Lyrics, Meaning, and Song Analysis www.wisehise.com

Movie Popcorn Prices: How Much Does Popcorn Cost at the Movies in 2024?

[ Cancel replying ]

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

No comments yet.

"When You Love A Woman" lyrics

Journey Lyrics

Meaning of When You Love A Woman by Journey

"When You Love A Woman" by Journey explores the profound experience of being in love and the depths to which it can affect one's life. The lyrics depict a journey of self-discovery, admitting past mistakes and a new-found realization of the power of love.

In the first verse, the speaker reflects on their past and acknowledges that they once believed they would never fall in love again. However, through introspection, they discover that they were mistaken. This suggests a personal transformation and a recognition that love still has a role to play in their life.

The chorus captures the essence of loving a woman. The singer expresses how when you truly love someone, you can see your entire world reflected in their eyes. The line about the band of gold signifies commitment and the enduring nature of love. It suggests that there is a promise of lasting happiness and fulfillment in a loving, committed relationship.

In the second verse, the singer shares their vulnerability and doubts about finding someone who is genuine and trustworthy. They acknowledge the challenges and complexities of falling in love, suggesting a fear of being hurt. However, they cling to hope and faith that this person is thinking of them in return.

The bridge emphasizes the emotional impact of love: it can bring tears to one's eyes when witnessing the person they love walking by. The intensity of the emotion is evident in the depth of connection felt between two people.

Overall, "When You Love A Woman" conveys the transformative power of love, highlighting the importance of having someone to stand by your side unconditionally. It speaks to the joy and fulfillment that can be found in a loving relationship, emphasizing the profound impact that love has on one's world when it is reciprocated.

This meaning interpretation was written by AI. Help improve it with your feedback

More from this artist

After All These Years

After the Fall

All Day All Night

All The Way

Trending this week

End of Beginning

Heaven Knows (The Angel Has Flown)

Orange & Lemons

Juan Martha

Banda El Limon

LETRAS.COM - Letras de canciones

Géneros musicales
Diccionario
Aplicaciones

Búsqueda rápida con Spotify

Mira la letra de lo que estás escuchando.

Enviar letra
Ubicación: Idioma:

Quiero recibir notificaciones de artistas destacados y noticias.

Inicia sesión para activar tu suscripción y eliminar los anuncios

Traducción generada automáticamente

When You Love A Woman

Cuando amas a una mujer

En mi vida veo donde he estado In my life I see where I've been Dije que nunca me volvería a caer I said that I'd never fall again Dentro de mí me equivoqué Within myself I was wrong Mi búsqueda no ha terminado My searchin' ain't over, over Lo sé I know that

Cuando amas a una mujer When you love a woman Ves tu mundo dentro de sus ojos You see your world inside her eyes Cuando amas a una mujer When you love a woman Sabes que está a tu lado You know she's standin' by your side Una alegría que dura para siempre A joy that lasts forever Hay una banda de oro que brilla esperando en alguna parte... oh sí There's a band of gold that shines waiting somewhere, oh, yeah

Si no puedo creer que alguien sea verdad If I can't believe that someone is true Enamorarse es tan difícil de hacer To fall in love is so hard to do Espero y rezo esta noche I hope and pray tonight En algún lugar que estés pensando en mi chica Somewhere you're thinkin' of me girl Sí, lo sé... lo sé Yes I know, I know that

Cuando amas a una mujer When you love a woman Ves tu mundo dentro de sus ojos You see your world inside her eyes Cuando amas a una mujer When you love a woman Sabes que está a tu lado You know she's standin' by your side Una alegría que dura para siempre A joy that lasts forever Hay una banda de oro que brilla esperando en algún lugar... oh There's a band of gold that shines waiting somewhere, oh

Es suficiente para hacerte llorar It's enough to make you cry Cuando la veas paseando por When you see her walkin' by Y la miras a los ojos And you look into her eyes

Cuando amas a una mujer When you love a woman Ves tu mundo dentro de sus ojos You see your world inside her eyes Cuando amas a una mujer When you love a woman Bueno, sabes que está a tu lado Well you know she's standin' by your side Una alegría que dura para siempre A joy that lasts forever Hay una banda de oro que brilla There's a band of gold that shines

Cuando amas a una mujer When you love a woman Cuando amas, amas, amas, amas When you love, love, love, love Cuando amas a una mujer When you love a woman Ves tu mundo dentro de sus ojos You see your world inside her eyes

Diccionario de pronunciación

Comentários.

Envie dúvidas, explicações e curiosidades sobre a letra

Faça parte dessa comunidade

Tire dúvidas sobre idiomas, interaja com outros fãs de Journey e vá além da letra da música.

Confira nosso guia de uso para deixar comentários.

Enviar para a central de dúvidas?

Dúvidas enviadas podem receber respostas de professores e alunos da plataforma.

Fixe este conteúdo com a aula:

Posts relacionados ver más en el blog.

Opções de seleção

Copiar trecho
Copiar toda a letra
Comentar sobre este trecho Novo
Pesquisar no dicionário de pronúncia
Don't Stop Believin'
Separate Ways (Worlds Apart)
Who's Crying Now
Any Way You Want It
Send Her My Love
Wheel In The Sky
I'll Be Alright Without You
Stone In Love
Only The Young
Ask The Lonely
Be Good To Yourself
Higher Place
Girl Can't Help It
Foolish Heart
After All These Years

Playlists relacionadas

BESAME (remix) (part. Seven Kayne, Milo J, Tiago PZK, KHEA y Neo Pistea) BHAVI
Fortnight (feat. Post Malone) Taylor Swift
The Tortured Poets Department Taylor Swift
Pretty Little Devil Shaya Zamora
I Can Do It With a Broken Heart Taylor Swift
Down Bad Taylor Swift
So Long, London Taylor Swift
But Daddy I Love Him Taylor Swift
Hell N Back (remix) (feat. Bakar) Summer Walker
Who's Afraid of Little Old Me? Taylor Swift

Contribuciones

¿estás buscando la traducción.

Todavía no recibimos esta contribución. ¿Te apetece enviárnosla?

Navegue sem anúncios

Curta as suas músicas sem interrupções

Pague uma vez e use por um ano inteiro

Já é assinante? Faça login .

Editar playlist

Share full article

For more audio journalism and storytelling, download New York Times Audio , a new iOS app available for news subscribers.

The Crackdown on Student Protesters

Columbia university is at the center of a growing showdown over the war in gaza and the limits of free speech..

This transcript was created using speech recognition software. While it has been reviewed by human transcribers, it may contain errors. Please review the episode audio before quoting from this transcript and email [email protected] with any questions.

[TRAIN SCREECHING]

Well, you can hear the helicopter circling. This is Asthaa Chaturvedi. I’m a producer with “The Daily.” Just walked out of the 116 Street Station. It’s the main station for Columbia’s Morningside Heights campus. And it’s day seven of the Gaza solidarity encampment, where a hundred students were arrested last Thursday.

So on one side of Broadway, you see camera crews. You see NYPD officers all lined up. There’s barricades, steel barricades, caution tape. This is normally a completely open campus. And I’m able to — all members of the public, you’re able to walk through.

[NON-ENGLISH SPEECH]

Looks like international media is here.

Have your IDs out. Have your IDs out.

Students lining up to swipe in to get access to the University. ID required for entry.

Swipe your ID, please.

Hi, how are you, officer? We’re journalists with “The New York Times.”

You’re not going to get in, all right? I’m sorry.

Hi. Can I help please?

Yeah, it’s total lockdown here at Columbia.

Please have your IDs out ready to swipe.

From “The New York Times,” I’m Michael Barbaro. This is “The Daily.” Today, the story of how Columbia University has become the epicenter of a growing showdown between student protesters, college administrators, and Congress over the war in Gaza and the limits of free speech. I spoke with my colleague, Nick Fandos.

[UPBEAT MUSIC]

It’s Thursday, April 25.

Nick, if we rewind the clock a few months, we end up at a moment where students at several of the country’s best known universities are protesting Israel’s response to the October 7 attacks, its approach to a war in Gaza. At times, those protests are happening peacefully, at times with rhetoric that is inflammatory. And the result is that the leaders of those universities land before Congress. But the president of Columbia University, which is the subject we’re going to be talking about today, is not one of the leaders who shows up for that testimony.

That’s right. So the House Education Committee has been watching all these protests on campus. And the Republican Chairwoman decides, I’m going to open an investigation, look at how these administrations are handling it, because it doesn’t look good from where I sit. And the House last winter invites the leaders of several of these elite schools, Harvard, Penn, MIT, and Columbia, to come and testify in Washington on Capitol Hill before Congress.

Now, the President of Columbia has what turns out to be a very well-timed, pre-planned trip to go overseas and speak at an international climate conference. So Minouche Shafik isn’t going to be there. So instead, the presidents of Harvard, and Penn, and MIT show up. And it turned out to be a disaster for these universities.

They were asked very pointed questions about the kind of speech taking place on their campuses, and they gave really convoluted academic answers back that just baffled the committee. But there was one question that really embodied the kind of disconnect between the Committee — And it wasn’t just Republicans, Republicans and Democrats on the Committee — and these college presidents. And that’s when they were asked a hypothetical.

Does calling for the genocide of Jews violate Penn’s rules or code of conduct? Yes or no?

If the speech turns into conduct, it can be harassment.

And two of the presidents, Claudine Gay of Harvard and Elizabeth Magill of the University of Pennsylvania, they’re unwilling to say in this really kind of intense back and forth that this speech would constitute a violation of their rules.

It can be, depending on the context.

What’s the context?

Targeted at an individual. Is it pervasive?

It’s targeted at Jewish students, Jewish individuals. Do you understand your testimony is dehumanizing them?

And it sets off a firestorm.

It does not depend on the context. The answer is yes. And this is why you should resign. These are unacceptable answers across the board.

Members of Congress start calling for their resignations. Alumni are really, really ticked off. Trustees of the University start to wonder, I don’t know that these leaders really have got this under control. And eventually, both of them lose their jobs in a really high profile way.

Right. And as you’ve hinted at, for somewhat peculiar scheduling reasons, Columbia’s President escapes this disaster of a hearing in what has to be regarded as the best timing in the history of the American Academy.

Yeah, exactly. And Columbia is watching all this play out. And I think their first response was relief that she was not in that chair, but also a recognition that, sooner or later, their turn was going to come back around and they were going to have to sit before Congress.

Why were they so certain that they would probably end up before Congress and that this wasn’t a case of completely dodging a bullet?

Well, they remain under investigation by the committee. But also, as the winter wears on, all the same intense protests just continue unabated. So in many ways, Columbia’s like these other campuses. But in some ways, it’s even more intense. This is a university that has both one of the largest Jewish student populations of any of its peers. But it also has a large Arab and Muslim student population, a big Middle Eastern studies program. It has a dual degree program in Tel Aviv.

And it’s a university on top of all that that has a real history of activism dating back to the 1960s. So when students are recruited or choose to come to Columbia, they’re actively opting into a campus that prides itself on being an activist community. It’s in the middle of New York City. It’s a global place. They consider the city and the world, really, like a classroom to Columbia.

In other words, if any campus was going to be a hotbed of protest and debate over this conflict, it was going to be Columbia University.

Exactly. And when this spring rolls around, the stars finally align. And the same congressional committee issues another invitation to Minouche Shafik, Columbia’s President, to come and testify. And this time, she has no excuse to say no.

But presumably, she is well aware of exactly what testifying before this committee entails and is highly prepared.

Columbia knew this moment was coming. They spent months preparing for this hearing. They brought in outside consultants, crisis communicators, experts on anti-Semitism. The weekend before the hearing, she actually travels down to Washington to hole up in a war room, where she starts preparing her testimony with mock questioners and testy exchanges to prep her for this. And she’s very clear on what she wants to try to do.

Where her counterparts had gone before the committee a few months before and looked aloof, she wanted to project humility and competence, to say, I know that there’s an issue on my campus right now with some of these protests veering off into anti-Semitic incidents. But I’m getting that under control. I’m taking steps in good faith to make sure that we restore order to this campus, while allowing people to express themselves freely as well.

So then the day of her actual testimony arrives. And just walk us through how it goes.

The Committee on Education and Workforce will come to order. I note that —

So Wednesday morning rolls around. And President Shafik sits at the witness stand with two of her trustees and the head of Columbia’s new anti-Semitism task force.

Columbia stands guilty of gross negligence at best and at worst has become a platform for those supporting terrorism and violence against the Jewish people.

And right off the bat, they’re put through a pretty humbling litany of some of the worst hits of what’s been happening on campus.

For example, just four days after the harrowing October 7 attack, a former Columbia undergraduate beat an Israeli student with a stick.

The Republican Chairwoman of the Committee, Virginia Foxx, starts reminding her that there was a student who was actually hit with a stick on campus. There was another gathering more recently glorifying Hamas and other terrorist organizations, and the kind of chants that have become an everyday chorus on campus, which many Jewish students see as threatening. But when the questioning starts, President Shafik is ready. One of the first ones she gets is the one that tripped up her colleagues.

Does calling for the genocide of Jews violate Columbia’s code of conduct, Mr. Greenwald?

And she answers unequivocally.

Dr. Shafik?

Yes, it does.

And, Professor —

That would be a violation of Columbia’s rules. They would be punished.

As President of Columbia, what is it like when you hear chants like, by any means necessary or Intifada Revolution?

I find those chants incredibly distressing. And I wish profoundly that people would not use them on our campus.

And in some of the most interesting exchanges of the hearing, President Shafik actually opens Columbia’s disciplinary books.

We have already suspended 15 students from Columbia. We have six on disciplinary probation. These are more disciplinary actions that have been taken probably in the last decade at Columbia. And —

She talks about the number of students that have been suspended, but also the number of faculty that she’s had removed from the classroom that are being investigated for comments that either violate some of Columbia’s rules or make students uncomfortable. One case in particular really underscores this.

And that’s of a Middle Eastern studies professor named Joseph Massad. He wrote an essay not long after Hamas invaded Israel and killed 1,200 people, according to the Israeli government, where he described that attack with adjectives like awesome. Now, he said they’ve been misinterpreted, but a lot of people have taken offense to those comments.

Ms. Stefanik, you’re recognized for five minutes.

Thank you, Chairwoman. I want to follow up on my colleague, Rep Walberg’s question regarding Professor Joseph Massad. So let me be clear, President —

And so Representative Elise Stefanik, the same Republican who had tripped up Claudine Gay of Harvard and others in the last hearing, really starts digging in to President Shafik about these things at Columbia.

He is still Chair on the website. So has he been terminated as Chair?

Congresswoman, I —

And Shafik’s answers are maybe a little surprising.

— before getting back to you. I can confirm —

I know you confirmed that he was under investigation.

Yes, I can confirm that. But I —

Did you confirm he was still the Chair?

He says that Columbia is taking his case seriously. In fact, he’s under investigation right now.

Well, let me ask you this.

I need to check.

Will you make the commitment to remove him as Chair?

And when Stefanik presses her to commit to removing him from a campus leadership position —

I think that would be — I think — I would — yes. Let me come back with yes. But I think I — I just want to confirm his current status before I write —

We’ll take that as a yes, that you will confirm that he will no longer be chair.

Shafik seems to pause and think and then agree to it on the spot, almost like she is making administrative decisions with or in front of Congress.

Now, we did some reporting after the fact. And it turns out the Professor didn’t even realize he was under investigation. So he’s learning about this from the hearing too. So what this all adds up to, I think, is a performance so in line with what the lawmakers themselves wanted to hear, that at certain points, these Republicans didn’t quite know what to do with it. They were like the dog that caught the car.

Columbia beats Harvard and UPenn.

One of them, a Republican from Florida, I think at one point even marvelled, well, you beat Harvard and Penn.

Y’all all have done something that they weren’t able to do. You’ve been able to condemn anti-Semitism without using the phrase, it depends on the context. But the —

So Columbia’s president has passed this test before this committee.

Yeah, this big moment that tripped up her predecessors and cost them their jobs, it seems like she has cleared that hurdle and dispatched with the Congressional committee that could have been one of the biggest threats to her presidency.

Without objection, there being no further business, the committee stands adjourned. [BANGS GAVEL]

But back on campus, some of the students and faculty who had been watching the hearing came away with a very different set of conclusions. They saw a president who was so eager to please Republicans in Congress that she was willing to sell out some of the University’s students and faculty and trample on cherished ideas like academic freedom and freedom of expression that have been a bedrock of American higher education for a really long time.

And there was no clearer embodiment of that than what had happened that morning just as President Shafik was going to testify before Congress. A group of students before dawn set up tents in the middle of Columbia’s campus and declared themselves a pro-Palestinian encampment in open defiance of the very rules that Dr. Shafik had put in place to try and get these protests under control.

So these students in real-time are beginning to test some of the things that Columbia’s president has just said before Congress.

Exactly. And so instead of going to celebrate her successful appearance before Congress, Shafik walks out of the hearing room and gets in a black SUV to go right back to that war room, where she’s immediately confronted with a major dilemma. It basically boils down to this, she had just gone before Congress and told them, I’m going to get tough on these protests. And here they were. So either she gets tough and risks inflaming tension on campus or she holds back and does nothing and her words before Congress immediately look hollow.

And what does she decide?

So for the next 24 hours, she tries to negotiate off ramps. She consults with her Deans and the New York Police Department. And it all builds towards an incredibly consequential decision. And that is, for the first time in decades, to call the New York City Police Department onto campus in riot gear and break this thing up, suspend the students involved, and then arrest them.

To essentially eliminate this encampment.

Eliminate the encampment and send a message, this is not going to be tolerated. But in trying to quell the unrest, Shafik actually feeds it. She ends up leaving student protesters and the faculty who support them feeling betrayed and pushes a campus that was already on edge into a full blown crisis.

[SLOW TEMPO MUSIC]

After the break, what all of this has looked like to a student on Columbia’s campus. We’ll be right back.

[PHONE RINGS]

Is this Isabella?

Yes, this is she.

Hi, Isabella. It’s Michael Barbaro from “The Daily.”

Hi. Nice to meet you.

Earlier this week, we called Isabella Ramírez, the Editor in Chief of Columbia’s undergraduate newspaper, “The Columbia Daily Spectator,” which has been closely tracking both the protests and the University’s response to them since October 7.

So, I mean, in your mind, how do we get to this point? I wonder if you can just briefly describe the key moments that bring us to where we are right now.

Sure. Since October 7, there has certainly been constant escalation in terms of tension on campus. And there have been a variety of moves that I believe have distanced the student body, the faculty, from the University and its administration, specifically the suspension of Columbia’s chapters of Students for Justice in Palestine and Jewish Voice for Peace. And that became a huge moment in what was characterized as suppression of pro-Palestinian activism on campus, effectively rendering those groups, quote, unquote, unauthorized.

What was the college’s explanation for that?

They had cited in that suspension a policy which states that a demonstration must be approved within a certain window, and that there must be an advance notice, and that there’s a process for getting an authorized demonstration. But the primary point was this policy that they were referring to, which we later reported, was changed before the suspension.

So it felt a little ad hoc to people?

Yes, it certainly came as a surprise, especially at “Spectator.” We’re nerds of the University in the sense that we are familiar with faculty and University governance. But even to us, we had no idea where this policy was coming from. And this suspension was really the first time that it entered most students’ sphere.

Columbia’s campus is so known for its activism. And so in my time of being a reporter, of being an editor, I’ve overseen several protests. And I’ve never seen Columbia penalize a group for, quote, unquote, not authorizing a protest. So that was certainly, in our minds, unprecedented.

And I believe part of the justification there was, well, this is a different time. And I think that is a reasonable thing to say. But I think a lot of students, they felt it was particularly one-sided, that it was targeting a specific type of speech or a specific type of viewpoint. Although, the University, of course, in its explicit policies, did not outline, and was actually very explicit about not targeting specific viewpoints —

So just to be super clear, it felt to students — and it sounds like, journalistically, it felt to you — that the University was coming down in a uniquely one-sided way against students who were supporting Palestinian rights and may have expressed some frustrations with Israel in that moment.

Yes. Certainly —

Isabella says that this was just the beginning of a really tense period between student protesters and the University. After those two student groups were suspended, campus protests continued. Students made a variety of demands. They asked that the University divest from businesses that profit from Israel’s military operations in Gaza. But instead of making any progress, the protests are met with further crackdown by the University.

And so as Isabella and her colleagues at the college newspaper see it, there’s this overall chilling effect that occurs. Some students become fearful that if they participate in any demonstrations, they’re going to face disciplinary action. So fast forward now to April, when these student protesters learned that President Shafik is headed to Washington for her congressional testimony. It’s at this moment that they set out to build their encampment.

I think there was obviously a lot of intention in timing those two things. I think it’s inherently a critique on a political pressure and this congressional pressure that we saw build up against, of course, Claudine Gay at Harvard and Magill at UPenn. So I think a lot of students and faculty have been frustrated at this idea that there are not only powers at the University that are dictating what’s happening, but there are perhaps external powers that are also guiding the way here in terms of what the University feels like it must do or has to do.

And I think that timing was super crucial. Having the encampment happen on the Wednesday morning of the hearing was an incredible, in some senses, interesting strategy to direct eyes to different places.

All eyes were going to be on Shafik in DC. But now a lot of eyes are on New York. The encampment is set up in the middle of the night slash morning, prior to the hearing. And so what effectively happens is they caught Shafik when she wasn’t on campus, when a lot of senior administration had their resources dedicated to supporting Shafik in DC.

And you have all of those people not necessarily out of commission, but with their focus elsewhere. So the encampment is met with very little resistance at the beginning. There were public safety officers floating around and watching. But at the very beginning hours, I think there was a sense of, we did it.

[CHANTING]: Disclose! Divest! We will not stop! We will not rest. Disclose! Divest! We will not stop!

It would be quite surprising to anybody and an administrator to now suddenly see dozens of tents on this lawn in a way that I think very purposely puts an imagery of, we’re here to stay. As the morning evolved and congressional hearings continued —

Minouche Shafik, open your eyes! Use of force, genocide!

Then we started seeing University delegates that were coming to the encampment saying, you may face disciplinary action for continuing to be here. I think that started around almost — like 9:00 or 10:00 AM, they started handing out these code of conduct violation notices.

Hell no! Hell no! Hell no!

Then there started to be more public safety action and presence. So they started barricading the entrances. The day progressed, there was more threat of discipline. The students became informed that if they continue to stay, they will face potential academic sanctions, potential suspension.

The more they try to silence us, the louder we will be! The more they —

I think a lot of people were like, OK, you’re threatening us with suspension. But so what?

This is about these systems that Minouche Shafik, that the Board of Trustees, that Columbia University is complicit in.

What are you going to do to try to get us out of here? And that was, obviously, promptly answered.

This is the New York State Police Department.

We will not stop!

You are attempting participate in an unauthorized encampment. You will be arrested and charged with trespassing.

My phone blew up, obviously, from the reporters, from the editors, of saying, oh my god, the NYPD is on our campus. And as soon as I saw that, I came out. And I saw a huge crowd of students and affiliates on campus watching the lawns. And as I circled around that crowd, I saw the last end of the New York Police Department pulling away protesters and clearing out the last of the encampment.

[CHANTING]: We love you! We will get justice for you! We see you! We love you! We will get justice for you! We see you! We love you! We will get justice for you! We see you! We love you! We will get justice for you!

It was something truly unimaginable, over 100 students slash other individuals are arrested from our campus, forcefully removed. And although they were suspended, there was a feeling of traumatic event that has just happened to these students, but also this sense of like, OK, the worst of the worst that could have happened to us just happened.

And for those students who maybe couldn’t go back to — into campus, now all of their peers, who were supporters or are in solidarity, are — in some sense, it’s further emboldened. They’re now not just sitting on the lawns for a pro-Palestinian cause, but also for the students, who have endured quite a lot.

So the crackdown, sought by the president and enforced by the NYPD, ends up, you’re saying, becoming a galvanizing force for a broader group of Columbia students than were originally drawn to the idea of ever showing up on the center of campus and protesting?

Yeah, I can certainly speak to the fact that I’ve seen my own peers, friends, or even acquaintances, who weren’t necessarily previously very involved in activism and organizing efforts, suddenly finding themselves involved.

Can I — I just have a question for you, which is all journalism, student journalism or not student journalism, is a first draft of history. And I wonder if we think of this as a historic moment for Columbia, how you imagine it’s going to be remembered.

Yeah, there is no doubt in my mind that this will be a historic moment for Colombia.

I think that this will be remembered as a moment in which the fractures were laid bare. Really, we got to see some of the disunity of the community in ways that I have never really seen it before. And what we’ll be looking to is, where do we go from here? How does Colombia repair? How do we heal from all of this? so That is the big question in terms of what will happen.

Nick, Isabella Ramírez just walked us through what this has all looked like from the perspective of a Columbia student. And from what she could tell, the crackdown ordered by President Shafik did not quell much of anything. It seemed, instead, to really intensify everything on campus. I’m curious what this has looked like for Shafik.

It’s not just the students who are upset. You have faculty, including professors, who are not necessarily sympathetic to the protesters’ view of the war, who are really outraged about what Shafik has done here. They feel that she’s crossed a boundary that hasn’t been crossed on Columbia’s campus in a really long time.

And so you start to hear things by the end of last week like censure, no confidence votes, questions from her own professors about whether or not she can stay in power. So this creates a whole new front for her. And on top of it all, as this is going on, the encampment itself starts to reform tent-by-tent —

— almost in the same place that it was. And Shafik decides that the most important thing she could do is to try and take the temperature down, which means letting the encampment stand. Or in other words, leaning in the other direction. This time, we’re going to let the protesters have their say for a little while longer.

The problem with that is that, over the weekend, a series of images start to emerge from on campus and just off of it of some really troubling anti-Semitic episodes. In one case, a guy holds up a poster in the middle of campus and points it towards a group of Jewish students who are counter protesting. And it says, I’m paraphrasing here, Hamas’ next targets.

I saw an image of that. What it seemed to evoke was the message that Hamas should murder those Jewish students. That’s the way the Jewish students interpreted it.

It’s a pretty straightforward and jarring statement. At the same time, just outside of Columbia’s closed gates —

Stop killing children!

— protestors are showing up from across New York City. It’s hard to tell who’s affiliated with Columbia, who’s not.

Go back to Poland! Go back to Poland!

There’s a video that goes viral of one of them shouting at Jewish students, go back to Poland, go back to Europe.

In other words, a clear message, you’re not welcome here.

Right. In fact, go back to the places where the Holocaust was committed.

Exactly. And this is not representative of the vast majority of the protesters in the encampment, who mostly had been peaceful. They would later hold a Seder, actually, with some of the pro-Palestinian Jewish protesters in their ranks. But those videos are reaching members of Congress, the very same Republicans that Shafik had testified in front of just a few days before. And now they’re looking and saying, you have lost control of your campus, you’ve turned back on your word to us, and you need to resign.

They call for her outright resignation over this.

That’s right. Republicans in New York and across the country began to call for her to step down from her position as president of Columbia.

So Shafik’s dilemma here is pretty extraordinary. She has set up this dynamic where pleasing these members of Congress would probably mean calling in the NYPD all over again to sweep out this encampment, which would mean further alienating and inflaming students and faculty, who are still very upset over the first crackdown. And now both ends of this spectrum, lawmakers in Washington, folks on the Columbia campus, are saying she can’t lead the University over this situation before she’s even made any fateful decision about what to do with this second encampment. Not a good situation.

No. She’s besieged on all sides. For a while, the only thing that she can come up with to offer is for classes to go hybrid for the remainder of the semester.

So students who aren’t feeling safe in this protest environment don’t necessarily have to go to class.

Right. And I think if we zoom out for a second, it’s worth bearing in mind that she tried to choose a different path here than her counterparts at Harvard or Penn. And after all of this, she’s kind of ended up in the exact same thicket, with people calling for her job with the White House, the Mayor of New York City, and others. These are Democrats. Maybe not calling on her to resign quite yet, but saying, I don’t know what’s going on your campus. This does not look good.

That reality, that taking a different tack that was supposed to be full of learnings and lessons from the stumbles of her peers, the fact that didn’t really work suggests that there’s something really intractable going on here. And I wonder how you’re thinking about this intractable situation that’s now arrived on these college campuses.

Well, I don’t think it’s just limited to college campuses. We have seen intense feelings about this conflict play out in Hollywood. We’ve seen them in our politics in all kinds of interesting ways.

In our media.

We’ve seen it in the media. But college campuses, at least in their most idealized form, are something special. They’re a place where students get to go for four years to think in big ways about moral questions, and political questions, and ideas that help shape the world they’re going to spend the rest of their lives in.

And so when you have a question that feels as urgent as this war does for a lot of people, I think it reverberates in an incredibly intense way on those campuses. And there’s something like — I don’t know if it’s quite a contradiction of terms, but there’s a collision of different values at stake. So universities thrive on the ability of students to follow their minds and their voices where they go, to maybe even experiment a little bit and find those things.

But there are also communities that rely on people being able to trust each other and being able to carry out their classes and their academic endeavors as a collective so they can learn from one another. So in this case, that’s all getting scrambled. Students who feel strongly about the Palestinian cause feel like the point is disruption, that something so big, and immediate, and urgent is happening that they need to get in the faces of their professors, and their administrators, and their fellow students.

Right. And set up an encampment in the middle of campus, no matter what the rules say.

Right. And from the administration’s perspective, they say, well, yeah, you can say that and you can think that. And that’s an important process. But maybe there’s some bad apples in your ranks. Or though you may have good intentions, you’re saying things that you don’t realize the implications of. And they’re making this environment unsafe for others. Or they’re grinding our classes to a halt and we’re not able to function as a University.

So the only way we’re going to be able to move forward is if you will respect our rules and we’ll respect your point of view. The problem is that’s just not happening. Something is not connecting with those two points of view. And as if that’s not hard enough, you then have Congress and the political system with its own agenda coming in and putting its thumb on a scale of an already very difficult situation.

Right. And at this very moment, what we know is that the forces that you just outlined have created a dilemma, an uncertainty of how to proceed, not just for President Shafik and the students and faculty at Columbia, but for a growing number of colleges and universities across the country. And by that, I mean, this thing that seemed to start at Columbia is literally spreading.

Absolutely. We’re talking on a Wednesday afternoon. And these encampments have now started cropping up at universities from coast-to-coast, at Harvard and Yale, but also at University of California, at the University of Texas, at smaller campuses in between. And at each of these institutions, there’s presidents and deans, just like President Shafik at Columbia, who are facing a really difficult set of choices. Do they call in the police? The University of Texas in Austin this afternoon, we saw protesters physically clashing with police.

Do they hold back, like at Harvard, where there were dramatic videos of students literally running into Harvard yard with tents. They were popping up in real-time. And so Columbia, really, I think, at the end of the day, may have kicked off some of this. But they are now in league with a whole bunch of other universities that are struggling with the same set of questions. And it’s a set of questions that they’ve had since this war broke out.

And now these schools only have a week or two left of classes. But we don’t know when these standoffs are going to end. We don’t know if students are going to leave campus for the summer. We don’t know if they’re going to come back in the fall and start protesting right away, or if this year is going to turn out to have been an aberration that was a response to a really awful, bloody war, or if we’re at the beginning of a bigger shift on college campuses that will long outlast this war in the Middle East.

Well, Nick, thank you very much. Thanks for having me, Michael.

We’ll be right back.

Here’s what else you need to know today. The United Nations is calling for an independent investigation into two mass graves found after Israeli forces withdrew from hospitals in Gaza. Officials in Gaza said that some of the bodies found in the graves were Palestinians who had been handcuffed or shot in the head and accused Israel of killing and burying them. In response, Israel said that its soldiers had exhumed bodies in one of the graves as part of an effort to locate Israeli hostages.

And on Wednesday, Hamas released a video of Hersh Goldberg-Polin, an Israeli-American dual citizen, whom Hamas has held hostage since October 7. It was the first time that he has been shown alive since his captivity began. His kidnapping was the subject of a “Daily” episode in October that featured his mother, Rachel. In response to Hamas’s video, Rachel issued a video of her own, in which she spoke directly to her son.

And, Hersh, if you can hear this, we heard your voice today for the first time in 201 days. And if you can hear us, I am telling you, we are telling you, we love you. Stay strong. Survive.

Today’s episode was produced by Sydney Harper, Asthaa Chaturvedi, Olivia Natt, Nina Feldman, and Summer Thomad, with help from Michael Simon Johnson. It was edited by Devon Taylor and Lisa Chow, contains research help by Susan Lee, original music by Marion Lozano and Dan Powell, and was engineered by Chris Wood. Our theme music is by Jim Brunberg and Ben Landsverk of Wonderly. That’s it for “The Daily.” I’m Michael Barbaro. See you tomorrow.

April 26, 2024 • 21:50 Harvey Weinstein Conviction Thrown Out
April 25, 2024 • 40:33 The Crackdown on Student Protesters
April 24, 2024 • 32:18 Is $60 Billion Enough to Save Ukraine?
April 23, 2024 • 30:30 A Salacious Conspiracy or Just 34 Pieces of Paper?
April 22, 2024 • 24:30 The Evolving Danger of the New Bird Flu
April 19, 2024 • 30:42 The Supreme Court Takes Up Homelessness
April 18, 2024 • 30:07 The Opening Days of Trump’s First Criminal Trial
April 17, 2024 • 24:52 Are ‘Forever Chemicals’ a Forever Problem?
April 16, 2024 • 29:29 A.I.’s Original Sin
April 15, 2024 • 24:07 Iran’s Unprecedented Attack on Israel
April 14, 2024 • 46:17 The Sunday Read: ‘What I Saw Working at The National Enquirer During Donald Trump’s Rise’
April 12, 2024 • 34:23 How One Family Lost $900,000 in a Timeshare Scam

Hosted by Michael Barbaro

Featuring Nicholas Fandos

Produced by Sydney Harper , Asthaa Chaturvedi , Olivia Natt , Nina Feldman and Summer Thomad

With Michael Simon Johnson

Edited by Devon Taylor and Lisa Chow

Original music by Marion Lozano and Dan Powell

Engineered by Chris Wood

Listen and follow The Daily Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Amazon Music

Columbia University has become the epicenter of a growing showdown between student protesters, college administrators and Congress over the war in Gaza and the limits of free speech.

Nicholas Fandos, who covers New York politics and government for The Times, walks us through the intense week at the university. And Isabella Ramírez, the editor in chief of Columbia’s undergraduate newspaper, explains what it has all looked like to a student on campus.

On today’s episode

Nicholas Fandos , who covers New York politics and government for The New York Times

Isabella Ramírez , editor in chief of The Columbia Daily Spectator

A university building during the early morning hours. Tents are set up on the front lawn. Banners are displayed on the hedges.

Background reading

Inside the week that shook Columbia University .

The protests at the university continued after more than 100 arrests.

There are a lot of ways to listen to The Daily. Here’s how.

We aim to make transcripts available the next workday after an episode’s publication. You can find them at the top of the page.

Research help by Susan Lee .

The Daily is made by Rachel Quester, Lynsea Garrison, Clare Toeniskoetter, Paige Cowett, Michael Simon Johnson, Brad Fisher, Chris Wood, Jessica Cheung, Stella Tan, Alexandra Leigh Young, Lisa Chow, Eric Krupke, Marc Georges, Luke Vander Ploeg, M.J. Davis Lin, Dan Powell, Sydney Harper, Mike Benoist, Liz O. Baylen, Asthaa Chaturvedi, Rachelle Bonja, Diana Nguyen, Marion Lozano, Corey Schreppel, Rob Szypko, Elisheba Ittoop, Mooj Zadie, Patricia Willens, Rowan Niemisto, Jody Becker, Rikki Novetsky, John Ketchum, Nina Feldman, Will Reid, Carlos Prieto, Ben Calhoun, Susan Lee, Lexie Diao, Mary Wilson, Alex Stern, Dan Farrell, Sophia Lanman, Shannon Lin, Diane Wong, Devon Taylor, Alyssa Moxley, Summer Thomad, Olivia Natt, Daniel Ramirez and Brendan Klinkenberg.

Our theme music is by Jim Brunberg and Ben Landsverk of Wonderly. Special thanks to Sam Dolnick, Paula Szuchman, Lisa Tobin, Larissa Anderson, Julia Simon, Sofia Milan, Mahima Chablani, Elizabeth Davis-Moorer, Jeffrey Miranda, Renan Borelli, Maddy Masiello, Isabella Anderson and Nina Lassam.

Nicholas Fandos is a Times reporter covering New York politics and government. More about Nicholas Fandos

Cast & crew
User reviews

Back to Black

The life and music of Amy Winehouse, through the journey of adolescence to adulthood and the creation of one of the best-selling albums of our time. The life and music of Amy Winehouse, through the journey of adolescence to adulthood and the creation of one of the best-selling albums of our time. The life and music of Amy Winehouse, through the journey of adolescence to adulthood and the creation of one of the best-selling albums of our time.