BicycleVolt

Trek FX2 vs FX3 (Comparison)

Photo of author

Bikes , Hybrid bikes , Other , Road bikes

Updated: April 25, 2023

Disclosure: I may receive referral fees from purchases made through links on BicycleVolt. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.

If you’re looking for advice in choosing between Trek’s FX2 and FX3, then you’ve come to the right place.

Trying to pick from one of these two great hybrid bikes is never going to be easy, so my intention today is to make that decision a little more straightforward for you.

I’ve previously compared the FX3 and FX4 and, on balance, felt there was a clear winner (Spoiler: it was the FX3). With the FX3 and FX4 there’s around a $150 price difference, so it’s important to be clear about what you get for your extra bucks. With the FX2 and FX3, there’s an even bigger price difference ($200), so what’s the deal? What do we get on the FX3 for our 200 dollars? Is that a worthwhile investment? Or should we keep the cash and get the FX2 instead?

Decisions. Decisions.

But, like I said, I’m trying to make this easier for you not harder. So, firstly I’m going to give you a side-by-side comparison of the spec list for these two bikes. Then I’ll highlight what the big differences are between the two with a review of each to show you where your money is being spent. Finally, I’ll give you my opinion on which bike gives you the best value for money.

If you just need an answer RIGHT NOW! then here’s my recommendation. My view is go with the FX3. I said it before in my comparison with the FX4 and I’ll say it again: it’s got to be one of the most perfect hybrid bikes out there. For leisure riding or commuting, when you’re looking to zip along smooth pavement, this is a great bike at a great price.

If you’ve got time for a bit more detail, then stick around and we’ll discuss these bikes further.

Trek FX overview

Hybrid bikes, like Trek’s FX range, are the unsung heroes of the bike world and I’m a huge fan.

When you want an ‘everyday’ bike that’s perfect for commuting to work on city streets, or zipping to the beach along smooth pavement, or loading up with groceries to bring back home…then a hybrid is the one you reach for. Sure, road bikes might be faster (though they’re not as comfortable to ride), and mountain bikes might be more rugged for shooting down black-graded bike trails, but they’re specialists. Generalist bikes i.e. hybrids are suited to a wider range of activities so they’re much more versatile.

That aside, they’re also a helluva lot of fun to ride.

Trek is a manufacturer with an awesome heritage (they’ve been on the go since 1976) and they’re FX range of hybrids is fantastic. Light aluminum frames with an upright and comfy riding position. An excellent set of components for each model and pricing to suit every pocket. Whichever FX you buy you know you’ll be getting a great hybrid bike and, with the top end models, you’ll get a bike that is capable of matching the speeds of many semi-pro road bikes.

As an aside, if you decide you need a bike that is more capable of taking on single-track bike trails, then hop on over to my article comparing the FX with Trek’s Dual Sport bikes . These are hybrids that come with an extra injection of ruggedness in the form of a front suspension fork to handle rough and bumpy terrain.

There are 14 models in the full FX range and these incorporate different component sets and a variety of frame shapes (male/unisex, step-through, and women’s). These go from the entry-level FX1 (under $500 and ideal for a variety of cycling activity) right up to the FX Sport 6, which has a drool-worthy carbon frame and spec list.

Let’s take a detailed look at the FX2 and FX3 to see how they compare to each other. Which has the best specification for the price? Which bike should you choose?

Trek FX2 review

trek fx 2 vs 3 reddit

The FX2 Disc is a big step up from the entry-level models, the FX1 and FX1 Disc. Many of the components have been given upgrades with the biggest improvement being the brakes.

The FX1 has a linear-pull brake system – a simple to operate (and maintain) braking system where the brake lever operates a cable which pulls brake blocks against the rims of the wheels slowing the bike down. Linear brakes work well in dry conditions where the wheel rims are in good condition. Unfortunately, they tend to fall down somewhat in wet, slippery conditions and where the rims are warped or dented.

A step up from linear-pull systems are mechanical disc brakes (as the FX1 Disc has). These have a separate brake disc near the wheel rims which the brake pads pull against. They’re operated by a cable from the brake lever and are less affected by water and mud than the linear-pull brakes.

The FX2, by comparison, has an even superior system: hydraulic disc brakes. These operate by pulling the brake lever which presses the brake pads against a brake disc near the wheel rims. Sounds similar to the mechanical disc brakes on the FX1 Disc? Well it is, but the difference lies in the bit that goes from the lever the brake pads. Mechanical disc brakes use a cable to transfer the braking force, whereas the hydraulic disc brakes use fluid. There’s lots of physics and technical jargon which explain the differences but in layman’s terms hydraulic brakes are more responsive, need less pull on the levers to operate, are less impacted by complex brake cable routing, and far lighter. In fact, the combination of the Tektro hydraulic disc brakes with the other improvements that the FX2 has, bring the bike in at nearly a pound and a half lighter than the FX1.

The FX2 Disc is a fantastic all-round package at a great price. It’s fast, responsive, and fun to ride. In fact, if the FX3 Disc didn’t exist, then I’d definitely recommend it as my bike of choice from the FX range.

Trek FX3 review

trek fx 2 vs 3 reddit

…I like the FX3 Disc. Cutting to the chase, this is my recommendation. However, there’s a $200 difference from the FX2, so is that price hike justified? Where are the differences with the FX2? Are they sufficient? (Another Spoiler Alert: yes, I think they are)

The FX3 is, I think, the tipping point where the FX goes from being an excellent hybrid bike for leisure cycling to something that is so much more than that. Take a look over the specification list above and you’ll see a number of critical upgrades. The ones I’d like to highlight are the forks, the brakes, the drivetrain, and the tires.

The FX3 has a bike weight of less than 26lbs and one of the main drivers for this is the front fork. This is the upgrade that, I feel, takes the bike into serious commuter bike territory. Swapping the alloy fork of the FX2 and below, for a carbon fiber fork gives a number of benefits including cutting weight and also giving more flexibility in order to soak up lumps and bumps in the road (to give you a more comfortable ride, particularly at higher speeds).

As with the FX2 the brakes are hydraulic disc brakes – with all the benefits that these provide in terms of responsiveness and stopping power. The FX3’s brakes are a step up though, swapping the Tektro HX-R280’s for Shimano’s MT201 braking system. As an aside you’ll see a number of Shimano upgrades throughout the FX3 spec list, notably the gear shifters and front/rear derailleurs.

Speaking of gears, the FX3 has a 2×9 system which is simpler to operate and less prone to niggles than 3 cog systems like the FX2 has. 2×9 gear systems also help to shave off a little extra bike weight as well. All of which helps you get places faster.

Something else that can get you there faster is the slimmer tires on the FX3. 700x32c Bontrager tires in comparison to the FX2’s 700x35c. Less rubber means less weight and it also reduces road friction which translates into higher speeds.

All of which goes to say that the FX3 Disc is my recommendation of these two excellent hybrids from Trek. And, my color of choice for the FX3? That would be the Rage Red. Awesome.

Conclusion – which one to go for?

Hopefully you’ll have got the message that I think the FX3 is the one to go for? But, look, here’s the deal. There’s a significant price gap between the two bikes so you need to be sure you’re choosing the right one for you. If you’re strictly an occasional leisure rider who likes to pedal along gently, then pocket the difference and grab yourself the FX2 (you’ll be delighted). If you ride regularly, you like going fast (possibly beating some of those road bikers in their tight spandex), and you do commuter miles during the week and more miles at the weekend, then I’d choose the FX3 Disc. You’ll be delighted and you’ll leave a trail of heartbroken “roadies” in your wake.

  • Cycling Basics
  • Cycling Techniques
  • Bike Maintenance
  • Bike Gear Reviews
  • Bike Destinations
  • Health + Fitness
  • Cycling Safety

trek fx 2 vs 3 reddit

CYCLING BASICS

CYCLING TECHNIQUES

BIKE MAINTENANCE

BIKE GEAR REVIEWS

BIKE DESTINATIONS

HEALTH + FITNESS

CYCLING SAFETY

2024 © BicycleVolt

AFFILIATE DISCLAIMER | COOKIE POLICY | TERMS | PRIVACY

Trek FX 2 Disc Equipped review: Unspectacular but effective

The trek fx 2 disc is a versatile all-rounder with surprising levels of comfort and stability.

The Trek FX 2 Disc leans against a graffiti'd container

Cyclingnews Verdict

Built around a frame with a superb balance between responsiveness and comfort, the Trek FX 2 Disc Equipped will tackle any task required of a hybrid bike in an effective, if unspectacular, manner

The frame has a great balance between responsiveness and comfort

Equipped for night riding, bikepacking or commuting

Can carry a decent amount of weight

Stable ride for long distances

Would need a drivetrain upgrade to become a serious fitness bike

On the heavy side for a rigid frame

You can trust Cyclingnews Our experts spend countless hours testing cycling tech and will always share honest, unbiased advice to help you choose. Find out more about how we test.

A hybrid bike can and will mean different things to different people. But sometimes it is simply the bike that fills the gaps, that doesn't do any one thing but in fact does it all. Purists may scoff and say to compromise is to ruin the essence of life: if you are not something, you are nothing. But Trek has offered a repost: if you can't be something, be everything.

That certainly appears to be the aim of the Trek FX 2 Disc Equipped. It's the jack-of-all-trades, odd-jobber of a bike. It comes, as the name suggests, fully loaded with a pannier rack, lights, mudguards and even a kickstand but what elevates it to a place among the best budget hybrid bikes available today is that, as part of Trek's fitness range, all that versatility does not come at the cost of all rideability. 

And that's a crucial element. Just because a bike has more practical functions – going to the shops, commuting, family bike rides etc – doesn't mean it can't be fun, have its own personality and leave us looking forward to running that next errand.

Trek's FX range of bikes is quite extensive, starting at the £500.00/$599.99 FX 1 and going all the way to the full-carbon £3,050.00/$2,799.99 FX Sport 6. The FX 2 is available with a step-through frame – in both the Equipped and standard versions – and has been updated for 2023, with the main difference from the 2021 model being a move from a 3x8 to a 2x9 gearing system.

The FX 2 Disc Equipped is priced at £740.00 - it's not currently available in the USA - which is £90 more than the FX 2 Disc standard (£650.00/$799.99) which foregoes the rack, lights, mudguards and kickstand. Although it does come in a couple of extra colour options.

Design and specification

Recognising alloy frames' bad reputation for comfort compared to steel and carbon, Trek set itself a goal to "build more compliant frames that retain the acceleration and affordability that have always made aluminium popular" – and it is the fruit of that labour that the FX 2 Disc Equipped is designed around. 

The Alpha Gold Aluminium frame, while not the lightest, does offer a great balance between responsiveness and comfort. It is also strong: according to Trek, the FX 2 Disc can take weights of up to 136kg (for bike, rider, and cargo combined), which fares well compared to other hybrid bikes in the same class such as the Merida Speeder 200 (120kg) and Scott Sub Cross 50 (128kg). The pannier rack that comes with it is also very solid and suitable for carrying loads up to 25kg despite weighing less than 600g itself.

My size large test bike as a whole weighed in at 13.4kg with pedals. The rack, lights, mudguards, and kickstand account for just over a kilogram of that weight but it's still a touch on the heavy side for a fixed-frame hybrid in this price range. 

While the focus is on the practicality of the frame, it is by no means ugly – especially when stripped of all the accessories – with internal cable routing, a gentle curve to the top tube that is reminiscent of the Specialized Sirrus (one of the classic beauties of the hybrid world) and the choice of a striking Viper Red or classy Lithium grey colourway. The geometry is pretty much what you would expect from a hybrid, with perhaps a slightly longer chainstay length adding to its stability. It is not as upright as, say, the Sirrus but similar to the Cannondale Quick 3 – which is a good bike to use as a comparison in general.

Like the Quick 3, the Trek FX 2 comes with a Shimano Acera/Altus 2x9 drivetrain and has an integrated mounting system in the stem, as well as the ability to track cadence and other metrics using an integrated wireless sensor. 

Trek's Blendr stem system is designed for easy installation of computers, lights and other accessories to your cockpit. It does, rather annoyingly, require an additional base to be purchased (which plugs into the stem) and then a further mount for the specific accessory (which attaches to the base) but that does allow for a wide range of options to suit all needs.  

The DuoTrap S is a Bluetooth/ANT+ sensor that integrates into the chainstay and wirelessly transmits to a smartphone or computer to track cadence and other metrics. Again, it requires a separate purchase, but the frame is set up for it to be attached without the need for zip wires or other ungainly fasteners.   

Trek has made an effort to include ergonomic grips on the FX 2 Disc Equipped, although they are a little on the basic side, especially compared to those on the more expensive models in the FX range. 

The lights, however, are far more impressive, particularly the AXA Greenline 35 headlight. USB-charging, it has a wide beam, is also designed to be visible from the side and is discreetly mounted on the top of the fork, which avoids cluttering the cockpit.

The Tektro HD-R280 hydraulic disc brakes are pretty standard now for mid-range hybrids. My test bike came with Bontrager H2 Comp 700x32c tyres but with the mudguards fitted there is room for up to 35mm and Bontrager H2 Hard-Case Light 700x35c tyres are listed as an option on the spec sheet. Without the mudguards, Trek says the frame can accommodate tyres up to 38mm in width.

Performance

Trek deserves credit here for really delivering on its aim of a responsive-yet-compliant frame. It's one thing coming up with the jargon, but another bringing it to fruition at a genuinely affordable price. While the FX 2 Disc Equipped might come across as a bit of a plodder on paper, in reality, it has a surprising amount of responsiveness. Loaded up with a carry pack on top of the pannier rack, I was happy overtaking other cyclists on reasonably fast country roads, knowing I had the acceleration to get past and back across to the side of the road in ample time.

Yes, it's no speed demon – it doesn't have the playfulness of the Boardman URB 8.9 or the lightweight climbing ability of the Merida Speeder 200, two bikes at a similar price point – but where it completely outscores both is in comfort and stability, even with a rack, mudguards, light, kickstand all bolted on. 

Interestingly enough, I took it for a ride with all those added extras stripped off and, while significantly lighter – making an obvious difference on climbs – there was not a huge noticeable change in its performance on the flat. 

My test bike came with a slightly-different-to-advertised Microshift Marvo front derailleur instead of Acera T3000, which is roughly equivalent, and I had no issues with it. However, as a whole, I did find the drivetrain to be under-par for a fitness bike. It's perfectly functional and will get you pretty much wherever you need to go, but it is a little clunky and I noted that the next bike up in the FX range, the FX 3 Disc Equipped , comes with a 10-speed Shimano Deore groupset which, in my experience, is a huge step up in performance. 

In particular, I could not get to grips with the drastic change when switching chainrings on the 46/30 chainset. If I didn't downshift on the 4th sprocket or earlier I found myself spinning out – and this is perhaps a rare example of the FX 2 Disc Equipped coming a little unstuck wanting to satisfy in all areas. That 16-tooth difference in the chainrings (the same difference as a 50/34 compact road chainset, for example) means the bike has the range to get up steep hills while also having enough gas on the flats, but the user experience is compromised a little in doing so. 

Where it doesn't compromise, however, is in its comfort and handling, whether I took it on potholed roads, bike paths, or light gravel it felt so balanced and stable. I was even happy taking it on the grassy, rutted track of a nearby nature reserve – and this was all with the standard 32 mm tyres it came with. Even when there was a little rattling, you could tell it was coming from the rack, fenders, and lights rather than the frame. 

Taking it out at night in light rain did little to change my faith in its dependability and the lights were superb, particularly the wide-beam fork-mounted headlamp – a marked improvement from the usual glorified-torch-on-the-handlebars setup I usually use. Neither front nor rear light offered an intermittent option but, having been driven to distraction on long night rides behind blinking bulbs in the past, that was no great loss to me.

I took the Trek FX 2 Disc Equipped on rides around the countryside, trips to the shops, rides with the kids, rides at night, in the rain, for exercise, for errands and more, and on every occasion, it delivered. It is solid and dependable without feeling clunky or cumbersome. It's not sexy but it's not ugly. It's not overly fun but it's no chore to ride.

It will do what it needs to do in almost every situation you will need a hybrid bike for. Not necessarily to the highest level, but to a high enough level that you won't feel like you are missing out. 

Yes, I did find the Altus/Acera groupset to be restrictive in terms of performance but drivetrains can be upgraded, along with wheels and grips and seatposts etc. Having a top frame is such a great building block. I would stress, however, this frame still has a ceiling to what it can do as a fitness bike, even if it were upgraded in all those areas. It is built for sturdiness as much as anything else and the fact that its performance was similar with and without the rack, fenders, kickstand et al is quite telling. I'm not going to use it to take on the Brecon Beacons in the Dragon Ride but I might choose it over a more expensive performance-oriented bike for a long-distance overnight ride such as the Dunwich Dynamo , where comfort, stability and safety are the overriding priorities.

Tech specs: Trek FX 2 Disc Equipped

  • Price Trek FX2 Disc Equipped : £740.00 / $N/A
  • Price Trek FX2 Disc : £650.00 / $799.99 
  • Sizes : S, M, L, XL
  • Weight : 13.4kg (actual, size L, with pedals)
  • Frame : Alpha Gold Aluminium
  • Fork : FX Alloy
  • Shifters : Shimano Altus M2010, 9-speed
  • Front derailleur : Microshift Marvo
  • Rear derailleur : Shimano Altus M2000
  • Crankset : 46/30
  • Cassette : Shimano HG200, 11-36, 9-speed
  • Brakes : Tektro HD-R280 hydraulic disc
  • Wheels : Bontrager Connection
  • Tyres : Bontrager H2 Comp, 700x32c
  • Saddle : Bontrager Sport
  • Seatpost : Bontrager Alloy, 12mm offset
  • Stem : Bontrager Comp, Blendr Compatible, 7-degree, 90mm length
  • Handlebars : Bontrager alloy, 31.8mm, 15mm rise
  • Extras : Rack, Eurofender Snello mudguards, Spanninga SOLO rear light and AXA Greenline 35 headlight, Bontrager Satellite grips, kickstand

trek fx 2 vs 3 reddit

Thank you for reading 5 articles in the past 30 days*

Join now for unlimited access

Enjoy your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1

*Read any 5 articles for free in each 30-day period, this automatically resets

After your trial you will be billed £4.99 $7.99 €5.99 per month, cancel anytime. Or sign up for one year for just £49 $79 €59

trek fx 2 vs 3 reddit

Try your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1

Ben has been a sports journalist for 16 years, covering everything from park football to the Olympic Games. As well as cycling, his passions include podcasts, tennis and speaking enough Italian to get by on his snowboarding trips to the Dolomites. A DIY rider who is almost as happy in the toolbox as he is in the saddle, he is still trying to emulate the feelings he experienced as a nine-year-old on his first Peugeot racer – he couldn’t fathom the down-tube friction shifters then and he’s still wrestling with groupsets now. When he isn’t making a beeline for the nearest Chiltern hill, he is probably tinkering or teaching his kids how to clean a bike properly. He rides a heavily modified 1980 Peugeot PVN10 Super Competition (steel is real) when the road is smooth and dry, and a BMC Alpenchallenge when it’s not.

'Front derailleur killer' Classified launches most premium partnership to date

Florian Sénéchal apologises after berating Bianchi in post-Roubaix rant

La Flèche Wallonne men LIVE - Can Tom Pidcock repeat his Amstel Gold success?

Most Popular

trek fx 2 vs 3 reddit

BikeRenovate

Trek FX2 Vs FX3 [Which Bike Is Better?]

These are two popular bikes in Trek’s lineup of fitness hybrids.

Both bikes are designed to provide a comfortable, efficient ride for recreational cyclists and commuters alike.

Both bikes feature a lightweight aluminum frame and a wide range of components, making them great options for riders looking for a reliable, comfortable ride.

However, FX2 and FX3 have their differences, and it’s important to understand these differences in order to make an informed decision about which bike is best for you.

In this article, we’ll compare Trek FX2 and FX3 in terms of frame materials, components, and overall performance.

Trek FX2 Vs FX3

What Is Trek Fx2 Bike

This one is an excellent choice for riders looking for a versatile hybrid bike that can handle a variety of terrain.

This bike is ideal for commuters, recreational cyclists, and fitness enthusiasts alike. With its lightweight aluminum frame and performance-oriented components, the FX2 is designed to provide a comfortable and efficient ride.

Trek FX2 features a lightweight aluminum frame that is both durable and responsive.

The frame is designed to provide a comfortable upright riding position, making it ideal for longer rides. The frame is also equipped with mounts for racks and fenders, making it a great choice for commuters. The FX2 is equipped with a Shimano drivetrain, providing smooth and reliable shifting.

This is also equipped with Tektro hydraulic disc brakes , providing excellent stopping power in all conditions.

FX2 also features a suspension fork that helps to absorb bumps and vibrations, making it more comfortable to ride. It is a great bike for riders looking for a versatile and comfortable ride.

Its lightweight aluminum frame, performance-oriented components, and comfortable upright riding position make it an ideal choice for commuters, recreational cyclists, and fitness enthusiasts alike.

Whether you’re looking for a bike to get you to and from work or just want to explore the great outdoors, the Trek FX2 is a great choice.

Advantages of Trek FX2

  • Affordability: This bike is generally priced lower than the FX3, making it a more budget-friendly option for those seeking a reliable hybrid bike.
  • Versatility: FX2 is designed as a versatile hybrid bike, suitable for commuting, fitness riding, and recreational cycling. It can handle a variety of terrains and riding conditions with ease.
  • Lightweight: Although not as light as FX3, the aluminum frame of FX2 still offers a lightweight build, making it easier to maneuver and accelerate.
  • Reliable Components: While not as high-end as FX3, the components on FX2 are still reliable and durable. They provide consistent performance and require minimal maintenance.

Disadvantages of Trek FX2

  • Lower-grade Frame Material: This one comes with a standard aluminum frame, which may not offer the same level of lightweightness and ride quality as an upgraded Alpha Gold Aluminum frame of FX3.
  • Limited Drivetrain Options: It typically comes with a 3×7 or 3×8-speed drivetrain, which provides a decent range of gears but may not offer the same efficiency and simplicity as the 2x drivetrain found on FX3.

What Is Trek Fx3 Bike

This is a versatile hybrid bike that is perfect for anyone looking for a reliable and comfortable ride.

It’s designed to be fast, agile, and comfortable, making it ideal for commuting, fitness riding, and recreational rides. The frame is lightweight aluminum, so it’s easy to carry and maneuver.

The geometry is designed to provide a comfortable upright riding position, and the suspension fork helps to absorb road bumps and vibrations.

FX3 is equipped with a Shimano drivetrain, making it easy to shift between gears. Tektro hydraulic disc brakes provide reliable stopping power in all conditions. This is a great option for anyone looking for a reliable and comfortable ride.

It’s a great choice for commuting, fitness, and recreational rides. The lightweight aluminum frame and suspension fork make it easy to maneuver, while the Shimano drivetrain and Tektro hydraulic disc brakes provide reliable performance.

The upright riding position and comfortable geometry make it a great choice for any rider.

If you’re looking for a reliable and comfortable ride, Trek FX3 is a great choice.

Advantages of Trek FX3

  • Upgraded Frame Material: FX3 features an Alpha Gold Aluminum frame, which is lighter and provides improved ride quality compared to the standard aluminum frame of the FX2.
  • Enhanced Drivetrain: This bike typically comes with a 2×9 or 2×10-speed drivetrain, offering a more streamlined gear range, smoother shifting, and improved efficiency.
  • Higher-quality Components: FX3 is equipped with higher-grade components, including shifters, derailleurs, cranksets, and brakes, which enhance performance and durability.
  • Light Weight: Due to an upgraded frame material and components, FX3 is generally lighter than FX2. This can contribute to easier maneuverability and improved efficiency.

Disadvantages of Trek FX3

  • Higher Price: FX3 is priced higher than FX2, making it less accessible for those on a tight budget.
  • Potential Overkill for Casual Riders: Its higher-end components and drivetrain of the FX3 may not be necessary for casual riders who do not require the additional features and performance benefits.

Trek Fx2 And Trek Fx3 Bike – Key Differences

These are both popular models of hybrid bikes manufactured by Trek. While they belong to the same series and share some similarities, there are key differences between the two models. Here are the main distinctions:

Trek FX2 Bike is a hybrid bike designed for commuters, fitness riders, and recreational cyclists. It features a lightweight aluminum frame and a suspension fork for a smooth ride.

The bike is equipped with Shimano components, including a 24-speed drivetrain, hydraulic disc brakes, and an adjustable stem.

It also comes with a comfortable saddle and flat handlebars for an upright riding position.FX2 is available in a variety of sizes and colors, and it can be customized with accessories such as fenders, a rack, and a kickstand.

Trek FX3 Bike is a hybrid bike designed for commuters, fitness riders, and recreational cyclists. It features a lightweight aluminum frame and a suspension fork for a smooth ride.

This bike is equipped with Shimano components, including a 27-speed drivetrain, hydraulic disc brakes , and an adjustable stem.

It also comes with a comfortable saddle and flat handlebars for an upright riding position. It is available in a variety of sizes and colors, and it can be customized with accessories such as fenders, a rack, and a kickstand.

Trek FX2 Bike: This bike features a Shimano Altus 9-speed drivetrain, which includes a Shimano Altus shifter, a Shimano Altus derailleur, and an 11-42T cassette. The drivetrain is designed to provide smooth and reliable shifting, making it easy to tackle hills and long rides.

This bike also features a sealed bottom bracket for improved durability and reduced maintenance.

Trek FX3 Bike: This bike features a Shimano Acera 9-speed drivetrain, which includes a Shimano Acera shifter, a Shimano Acera derailleur, and an 11-34T cassette. The drivetrain is designed to provide smooth and reliable shifting, making it easy to tackle hills and long rides.

Trek FX2 Bike: It features Bontrager Connection double wall rims with alloy hubs and stainless steel spokes. Its wheels are designed to provide a strong and reliable connection between the bike and the road, allowing for a smooth and comfortable ride.

The wheels are also lightweight and durable, making them ideal for commuters and recreational riders alike.

Trek FX3 Bike: It features Bontrager Connection double wall rims with alloy hubs and stainless steel spokes. Its wheels are designed to provide a strong and reliable connection between the bike and the road, allowing for a smooth and comfortable ride.

Additionally, these wheels feature an eye-catching design that will make you stand out from the crowd.

These Trek bikes are equipped with Tektro MD-C550 mechanical disc brakes . These brakes are designed to give the rider maximum stopping power in all conditions. They feature adjustable reach levers, which allow for easy adjustment of the brake lever position.

Tektro MD-C550 brakes also offer consistent braking performance in wet and dry conditions.

These brakes are also low maintenance and require minimal servicing. Both Trek FX2 and FX3 bikes come with front and rear Tektro MD-C550 brakes, allowing the rider to stop quickly and confidently.

Trek FX2 Bike is a hybrid bike that is designed to offer a comfortable and efficient ride on a variety of terrain.

It features a lightweight aluminum frame, Shimano components, and a suspension fork to absorb bumps and vibrations. FX2 also has a wide range of gears to help you tackle hills and long rides.

The bike is ideal for commuters, recreational riders, and those looking for an all-around bike.

Trek FX3 Bike is an upgraded version of FX2.

It features a lightweight aluminum frame, Shimano components, and a suspension fork to absorb bumps and vibrations.

FX3 also has a wide range of gears to help you tackle hills and long rides. This bike is ideal for commuters, recreational riders, and those looking for an all-around bike.

In addition, FX3 has an adjustable stem, disc brakes, and a wider range of gears to make it a great choice for more experienced riders.

Trek FX2 Bike: It features a front suspension system to absorb bumps and provide a smoother ride. The FX2 has an SR Suntour NEX suspension fork with 63mm of travel.

This is a good amount of travel for a hybrid bike, and it will help to smooth out the ride on rough roads or trails.

FX2 also features a rear suspension system to help absorb bumps and provide a smoother ride. The rear suspension on the FX2 is a coil-over shock with 50mm of travel. This is a simple and effective suspension system that will help to make your ride more comfortable.

Trek FX3 Bike: It features a front suspension system to absorb bumps and provide a smoother ride. FX3 has an SR Suntour XCT suspension fork with 100mm of travel.

This is more travel than the FX2, and it will provide a smoother ride on rougher roads or trails.

FX3 also features a rear suspension system to help absorb bumps and provide a smoother ride. The rear suspension on the FX3 is an air-sprung shock with 50mm of travel. This is a more advanced suspension system than the coil-over shock on FX2, and it will provide a smoother and more controlled ride.

Accessories

Trek FX2 Bike Accessories

It is a great bike for recreational riders who want a comfortable ride and an affordable price. It comes with a variety of accessories that can help you get the most out of your bike.

  • Bike Rack: A bike rack is a great way to store your FX2 when you’re not using it. This can be helpful if you want to take your bike on road trips or commute to work.
  • Fenders: Fenders are a great way to keep dirt and debris from flying up onto you while riding. This can be especially helpful if you’re riding in wet or muddy conditions.
  • Lights: Lights are important for visibility when riding in low light conditions. This can help you stay safe and avoid accidents.
  • Water Bottle Cage: A water bottle cage is a great way to stay hydrated while riding. This is especially important if you’re riding for long distances or in hot weather.
  • Helmet: A helmet is essential for safety while riding. This is the most important accessory you can buy, as it can protect your head in the event of a crash.
  • Pump: A pump is necessary for keeping your tires inflated. This is important for ensuring that your tires have the correct pressure, which can help you ride more efficiently and comfortably.
  • Lock: A lock is a great way to keep your bike secure when you’re not riding it. This is especially important if you’re leaving your bike in a public place.

Trek FX3 Bike Accessories

It is an upgraded version of the FX2, and it comes with a few additional accessories that can help you get the most out of your bike.

  • Kickstand: A kickstand is a great way to keep your bike upright when you’re not riding it. This can be helpful if you’re parking your bike in a tight space or if you need to take a break from riding.
  • Basket: A basket is a great way to store items while you’re riding. This can be helpful if you need to carry groceries or other supplies with you.
  • Tool Kit: A tool kit is essential for making repairs and adjustments on the go. This can be helpful if you have a flat tire or if you need to make a minor adjustment to your bike.

Both the Trek FX2 and FX3 are great bikes for recreational riders who want a comfortable ride and an affordable price. The FX3 comes with a few additional accessories that can help you get the most out of your bike, but the FX2 is still a great option if you’re on a budget.

Trek FX2 Bikes: It features Shimano Altus 8-speed shifters. These shifters are designed for reliable and easy shifting, with a light action that makes it easy to get into the right gear.

Altus shifters are also designed to be durable and reliable, so you can count on them to last for many rides to come.

These shifters feature an ergonomic design that is comfortable to use, even on long rides. The shifters are also easy to operate, even with gloves on.

Trek FX3 Bikes: It features Shimano Altus 9-speed shifters. These shifters offer a wider range of gearing options than the 8-speed shifters on the FX2, which can be helpful for climbing hills or riding on different terrain.

The Altus 9-speed shifters also feature an ergonomic design that is comfortable to use, even on long rides. The shifters are also easy to operate, even with gloves on.

Trek Fx2 Vs Fx3 Bike – Similarities

There are many similarities between the bikes. Here are some similarities between the Trek FX2 and Trek FX3 bikes:

Hybrid Design

Both the Trek FX2 and Trek FX3 belong to Trek’s FX series, which is designed as versatile hybrid bikes. These bikes are suitable for a variety of purposes, including commuting, fitness riding, and recreational cycling.

Frame Geometry

The frame geometry of the FX2 and FX3 is similar, aimed at providing a comfortable and efficient riding position. The geometry is typically optimized for a more upright riding posture, allowing for better visibility and reducing strain on the rider’s back and neck.

Both models typically come with a 700c wheel size, which is a common standard for hybrid bikes . This wheel size strikes a balance between efficiency and comfort, offering good rolling capability on various terrains.

The FX2 and FX3 usually come with relatively wide tires compared to road bikes, providing added stability and comfort. The exact tire width may vary depending on the specific model and tire configuration, but generally, they are designed for a mix of paved roads and light off-road trails.

Mounting Points

Both bikes typically feature mounting points on the frame, fork, and seat stays. These allow you to attach accessories such as racks, fenders, and water bottle cages, adding versatility for commuting or touring purposes.

Compatibility

Both the FX2 and FX3 are compatible with a range of additional accessories and components, such as kickstands, lights, and panniers. This flexibility enables you to customize the bike based on your specific needs and preferences.

Brake Options

The FX2 and FX3 typically offer multiple braking options. They may come equipped with either V-brakes or disc brakes, depending on the specific model and configuration. This allows riders to choose the braking system that suits their preferences and riding conditions.

FX2 and Trek FX3 bikes are best suited for a variety of terrain, including paved roads, gravel paths, and light trails.

FX2 is a hybrid bike that is designed for comfort and versatility, making it ideal for commuting, leisurely rides, and light off-road adventures.

FX3 is a more performance-oriented bike, with a lightweight frame and components that make it better suited for longer rides and more challenging terrain.

Final Words

Trek FX2 and FX3 bikes are both great options for cyclists looking for a reliable and comfortable ride.

FX2 is a great choice for those who are new to cycling and want a comfortable ride with plenty of features. FX3 is a great choice for those who are looking for a more performance-oriented ride with additional features.

Both bikes offer a great combination of comfort, reliability, and performance, making them ideal for any cyclist.

Laura Anderson

Hi, I am Laura Anderson. I am a renowned Lady biker in my neighborhood. So, Mike introduced me to his beloved friend Mehedi. So that I can talk with you about my experience and renovation of cycles, especially those that are used by females. But having knowledge about the bikes, I have written and will be written.

Scott Spark Vs Genius [Which Bike Is Better?]

Shimano altus vs deore [which groupset is better], leave a reply cancel reply.

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

  • RWR Home Page
  • Recent Posts
  • Bike Reviews

Trek FX 2 Review: Ultimate Guide To The Fitness Hybrid Gravel Grinder

  • by Riding With Ryan (Official)

My first bike from a legitimate bike shop was a Trek FX 2 Disc. There have been several changes over the years, almost all making this bike even better. If you are just getting into cycling and are interested in this Trek FX 2 review, be very careful. This bike will draw you into cycling, and soon you will start obsessing about saving grams, LYCRA, and Strava KOMs. Also, be sure to check out this 2022 Trek FX 3 review .

No need to worry about high prices with this bike. In other words, the Trek FX 2 is an awesome bike with a low price point, below $1,000. So what kind of bike is it, and who is it good for? These are both questions we will answer, and more, in this Trek FX 2 review. After that, you will want to call your bike shop to setup a test ride.

What Kind Of Bike Is The Trek FX 2?

The Trek FX 2 is a fitness hybrid bike. A hybrid bike is simply any bike that doesn’t fall into a specific category like road bike, mountain bike or cruiser. Fitness hybrids are bikes with similar geometry to an endurance road bike, but it will have flat handlebars instead of traditional road bike drop bars.

Fitness hybrid bikes can be ridden in the road, on light gravel, or a combination of the two. They make great bikes for commuting, as well as making an awesome gravel bike with flat bars. It really is a do-it all bike that’s good at everything, great at nothing.

For a long time I ran two different sets of wheels on my Trek FX 2. I had a set of wheels with 40mm gravel tires, and I replaced the stock 35mm tires for some slightly more aggressive 32mm road tires for the factory wheelset. Eventually tire upgrades were not enough and I started buying upgraded bikes. However, I love my Trek FX 2 so much I still own it today.

Who Is The Trek FX 2 Good For?

The Trek FX 2 is made for anyone looking for a high quality ride without sacrificing comfort. This bike is incredibly fast to anyone not already riding a road bike. With beefier tires its a capable endurance bike.

The Trek FX 2 has multiple rack and fender mounts for commuters, and plenty of storage add-ons available for tourers.

It’s not often a single bike fills the holes of so many different riding disciplines. This Trek FX 2 review may be the first bike review I’ve done that covers road biking, fitness, gravel, and recreational riding. All of which are extremely fun and comfortable on the FX 2. The only riding discipline the FX 2 isn’t good for is mountain biking.

Trek FX 2 Gravel Upgrades

One of the most popular questions in the bike shop these days is about gravel bikes. Its an awesome riding discipline that has exploded in popularity for good reason. An easy and affordable way to ride gravel is with the Trek FX 2.

The maximum tire size recommended by Trek for the FX 2 Disc model is a 38mm tire. I have first hand experience fitting 40mm tires on my Trek FX 2 without a single issue. Above all, you don’t want to risk your warranty. It’s best to stay within the specifications Trek recommends. Adding fenders restricts that maximum tire size to 35mm.

After the new tires the FX 2 is ready to shred your next gravel trail. Modifying grips and saddles, as well as adding clipless pedals are all recommendations I would make. Getting those accessories specifically for gravel riding will only enhance your riding experience.

Gravel Purists, or Gravel Snobs, will not appreciate your flat bar gravel bike. Gravel bikes have drop handlebars. Some forged bar ends hanging down should be the final touch to keep everyone happy. They will also give you some additional hand positions on longer rides.

Is the Trek FX 2 Worth It?

Yes, the 2022 Trek FX 2 Disc is certainly worth it’s $779.99 price tag. Save the extra $150 to afford the Trek FX 3 Disc. It comes with an upgraded group set and a carbon fork to eat up additional vibrations from the road. In other words, you can’t go wrong with any Trek FX model.

The 2022 Trek FX 2 Disc bikes come in two color options. Firstly, is Trek’s traditional Satin Lithium Gray that has been a color option every year on the FX model. The second color option is absolute fire. It is Satin Viper Red and it looks amazing.

I love the Viper Red for two reasons. Firstly, it makes the bike look great and look fast. Secondly, is the way the color stands out. Someone driving by is going to see this Viper Red bike. If they see you they are less likely to run you over. Which is, you know, a great thing!

If you are looking for a great way to transport your bikes read: Kuat NV 2.0 Review .

Trek FX 2 Disc vs Rim Brakes

Trek offers the FX 1 and 2 models in rim brake and disc brake versions. The FX 3 is disc brakes only. What exactly is the difference, and are disc brakes worth the upgrade? Lets dive into those details.

First, the difference between disc and rim brakes can be dramatic. Disc brakes provide better stopping power in all conditions. The Tour De France was won on rim brakes for over 100 years, but you can’t argue against disc brake stopping ability.

The only reason someone should consider rim brakes over disc brakes is if their budget requires it. Riding a rim brake bike is better than riding no bike at all. Also, many dry climates won’t notice much difference between disc and rim brakes. The differences are more noticeable in wet riding conditions.

In conclusion, if you aren’t sure which model of FX is best for you I’d recommend browsing through the details on Trek’s website. Also, you can read this 2022 Trek FX 3 review .

1 thought on “Trek FX 2 Review: Ultimate Guide To The Fitness Hybrid Gravel Grinder”

' src=

I just bought a Trek FX 2 Disc at Scheels Grand Forks, North Dakota on July 22nd, 2023. They installed cheap brake: RUSH bake system and Cheap tire 700x32c with no name on it into my bike. These components were not as specifications on sale list at Scheels Grand Forks, North Dakota. The bake system should be Tektro HD-R280 and the tires should be Bontrager H2 Comp, 700x35c. First, they said that they will replace the brake and the tire as the specifications on the sale list. Then they call me to come back to the store and told me they only change the tires to the Bontrager H2 Comp, and if I want to change the brake I have to pay for the labor. I really disappointed about this. To my experience, you should check out the component of the Trek bike before you buy it. If you don’t, maybe your Trek bike get a cheap component installed on it.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Privacy Overview

en_US

CyclistsHub.com logo 500px with transparent background.

Subscribe to my YouTube channel for video reviews.

Trek FX 1 vs. 2 vs. 3 and FX Sport 4 vs. 5 vs. 6 Compared: Which One to Choose?

Profile picture of Petr Minarik - the founder of cyclistshub.com

CyclistsHub is supported by its readers. We may receive a commission if you buy products using our links.

In this article, I’ll help you navigate the Trek FX hybrid bike family by comparing the FX 1 , 2, 3, and FX Sport 4, 5, and 6 .

You’ll learn about the differences between each model, who they are best suited for, and more. 

Plus, I’ll tell you which model gives you the best value for your money to help make your decision easier.

KEY TAKEAWAY

Trek FX and FX Sport are ideal hybrid bikes for commuting and maintaining your fitness, thanks to their sporty geometry. They also have smooth tires, so you will be fast on paved roads. However, they can handle light terrain as well. On the other hand, they are still slower and heavier than the Trek Madone or Émonda and less versatile than the Trek Dual Sport .

Trek FX 1 vs. 2 vs. 3 and FX Sport 4 vs. 5 vs. 6

The following table summarizes the main differences between all FXs and FXs Sport, Trek’s hybrid bike families .

FX (Sport) Pros & Cons Summary

I summarized the pros & cons of the FX (Sport) series below.

FX (Sport) Pros

  • Relaxed geometry for a comfortable ride
  • Suitable for a wide range of terrains
  • Aluminum or carbon frame
  • Availability in multiple sizes and colors
  • Pedals included
  • Compatible with racks, kickstands, etc.
  • Compatible with DuoTrap S sensor
  • Partially internal cable routing
  • Lifetime warranty

FX (Sport) Cons

  • Some bikes have a narrow gear range
  • Some models don’t come with tubeless-ready wheels or tires
  • No suspension (can be a pro due to the lower weight)

Also available as a step-through

FX Main Features

Let me now explain the most important features of the Trek FX and FX Sport bikes and compare these two families.

Frame and Geometry

All FX bikes come with an aluminum frame , available in XS-XXL sizes , but with forks made of different materials – steel, aluminum, or carbon.

FX Sport bikes have a high-end carbon frame with a carbon fork , resulting in lower weight and better riding comfort due to carbon’s ability to absorb road vibrations.

Trek FX (top) vs. Trek FX Sport (bottom) comparison.

Their geometry also differs slightly. Despite the name suggesting a more performance-oriented geometry, the FX Sport is surprisingly more relaxed , allowing you to sit more upright.

The geometry of both FX families is relaxed enough for less flexible riders and those who prefer comfort over the speed that comes from a more aggressive, and therefore more aerodynamic, stance.

Trek FX vs. FX Sport geometry comparison using the bikeinsights.com tool. FX is more aggressive than FX Sport.

Finally, it is important to add that FX bikes are also available in a step-through version suitable for women. FX Sport bikes are not.

Wheels and Tires

The wheel size on FX bikes is the same as on most hybrid bikes – 700c – but with wider tires than those used on road bikes, ranging from 32 to 40mm. The tire clearance is up to 45mm.

The tires have a pattern to provide increased traction on light gravel or dirt roads but are not suitable for demanding terrain like mountain bike tires.

Trek FX Bontrager Connection wheel and H2 Comp tire detail.

Remember that some models have tubeless-ready wheels but don’t come with tubeless-ready tires , so you may need to swap them later if you want.

Also, the higher-end the bike, the better the wheels. For example, the Trek FX Sport 6 has carbon Bontrager wheels that are lighter, stiffer, and a bit faster than the aluminum ones.

While the FX family offers a wider range of gears thanks to 2X and 3X drivetrains, the FX Sport has a narrower gear range due to the 1X drivetrains.

1X drivetrains are popular because they are easy to maintain and shift and lighter than 2X or 3X groupsets.

However, their disadvantage is a smaller gear range. So, depending on the terrain you often want to ride, you may occasionally miss some gears. On the other hand, you don’t have to worry about cross-chaining.

Although the FX series offers entry-level models with rim brakes (which are also a bit cheaper), the industry’s pressure has pushed for disc brakes.

Disc brakes are more effective, especially in the rain, as they do not lose their braking power. The debate between supporters and opponents of disc and rim brakes seems endless.

Trek FX and FX Sport mechanical/hydraulic disc brakes.

All FX bikes, except for one model, use hydraulic disc brakes . Check out this article for the differences between mechanical and hydraulic disc brakes .

Since hybrid bikes often don’t require as much braking power as mountain bikes, you can rely on sufficient stopping power for all the used brakes.

Another difference between FX and FX Sport is cable routing . On Trek FX , it is partially integrated , while on FX Sport , it is almost completely integrated , including the area around the handlebars, simplifying and improving the overall appearance.

All FX and FX Sport bikes are compatible with the DuoTrap S sensor , sold separately, which measures your speed, distance, and more. You can pair it with a speedometer or bike computer.

Trek FX with DuoTrap S sensor (detail).

FX frames have mounts for kickstands and racks , making it easy to install these accessories. You can also leverage the Blendr stem to easily attach compatible accessories from the Trek/Bontrager ecosystem.

Lastly, most FX bikes come with slip-on grips , while all FX Sport models have lock-on grips that are easier to install and replace than slip-on grips. FX Sport bikes also use better IsoZone grips that are more comfortable and alleviate the pressure on your hands.

So, which bike should you choose between Trek FX and Trek FX Sport? And which bike from each family is the best?

If you’re on a tighter budget and looking for an affordable bike for commuting and leisure riding, then go for Trek FX. These bikes are mostly sufficient for beginners.

Trek FX Sport bikes are more expensive due to their carbon frames, which result in much lower weight. They resemble road bikes with flat handlebars and are suitable for those looking for a lightweight and comfortable hybrid bike. Just remember that their gear range is more limited.

I believe the FX 2 Disc provides the best value for the money from the FX family. First, you avoid an obsolete 3X drivetrain on the FX 1 Disc . Then, you get hydraulic disc brakes, significant weight reduction, and better components. While the price difference between the FX 2 and FX 3 is relatively large, the added value is not as significant.

The best bike from the Trek FX Sport family is the mid-range FX Sport 5 Disc, as it uses a simple 1X drivetrain and is much lighter than the FX Sport 4.

While the Trek FX Sport 6 is much lighter, mainly due to the carbon wheels, it is also much more expensive.

Trek FX FAQ

Trek FX bikes are designed for riders who seek a versatile bike that can handle a variety of terrains and riding styles, from commuting to fitness rides and from paved roads to light off-road. These hybrid bikes are comfortable and reliable and offer a balance between the speed of road bikes and the versatility of mountain bikes. With many models available, Trek FX and FX Sport bikes are suitable for riders of all levels, from beginners to experienced cyclists.

The main difference between Trek FX and Trek FX Sport is the frame. FX bikes have an aluminum frame with a fork made from different materials depending on the range. In contrast, FX Sport bikes have an aerodynamically shaped carbon frame that resembles modern road bikes. FX bikes offer a wider gear range but can be more complex when it comes to shifting. Most FX Sport bikes leverage 1X shifting for weight reduction and easier shifting. If you’re looking for a more budget-friendly bike and don’t prioritize performance, you should consider buying a Trek FX. However, if you want a lightweight hybrid bike and don’t mind spending more money, then the Trek FX Sport is more suitable for you.

The Trek FX and Trek Verve bikes differ in their frame geometry. The Trek FX has a relaxed yet more aggressive geometry, making it great for maintaining fitness and riding longer distances. On the other hand, the Trek Verve is more suited for riding in the city. It has an upright riding position that gives you better visibility, particularly in traffic. Additionally, Verve bikes come with a suspension seatpost to increase your riding comfort. They also offer better maneuverability.

The Trek FX and Trek Verve bikes have different frame geometry, suspension, and tires. The Trek FX has a more relaxed geometry compared to the Dual Sport. Dual Sport bikes are similar to mountain bikes but not as extreme. They have front suspension with short travel and wide tires that make them better suited for off-road riding and rough terrain.

About The Author

Profile picture of Petr Minarik - the founder of cyclistshub.com

Petr Minarik

2 thoughts on “trek fx 1 vs. 2 vs. 3 and fx sport 4 vs. 5 vs. 6 compared: which one to choose”.

Profile picture of Petr Minarik - the founder of cyclistshub.com

Thanks for the article, I’m trying to decide on a new hybrid and I have my eye on an FX 3 Disc or FX Sport 4. Unfortunately at least one of your specs is inaccurate for both of these bikes – both have a 1×10 drivetrain, instead of a 2×10 which you have in the table, while you specifically call out the 2x and 3x drivetrains as a benefit of the FX series. I am hesitant about the more limited range but I do like the simplicity and weight savings, and it does seem to be where things are headed anyway.

Profile picture of Petr Minarik - the founder of cyclistshub.com

Hi Anne, Thanks for noticing that. I fixed the info. I would say that the gear range also depends on the area you live in. If you have a lot of hills and climbs there, a wider gear range might be more useful. But the simplicity of shifting can overweigh. I know many recreational riders who don’t use their entire gear range, so 1X groupsets should be enough for them. I hope this helps. 🙂 – Petr

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Start typing and press enter to search

  • News, Current Affairs & Politics

CycleChat Cycling Forum

  • Cycling Forums
  • Bikes & Buying Advice - What Bike?

trek fx 2 2022 vs giant escape 3 vs pinnacle neon 1 vs pinnacle lithium 3

  • Thread starter sasquath
  • Start date 1 Sep 2021

Well-Known Member

vickster

Legendary Member

vickster said: If you want a bike with a suspension fork (is that what you mean by front shock), better to buy a bike designed with one. why do you need to cycle one handed? Disability? Click to expand...

I’ve had an FX in the past, not really designed for proper off road, although they do come with fatter tyres these days (mine was 28mm IIRC, carbon fork, rim brakes) These are more flat bar road bikes than mountain bikes. A number of other brands offer front suspension 700c hybrids, Whyte, Merida, Fuji from Wiggle , Ridgeback, Boardman, Cube for example although stocks are low all over  

Cycleops

Don’t know why a hybrid without a suspension fork would be ‘super squirrelly’, perhaps any owners on here could comment if they’ve encountered this phenomenon. A suspension fork isn’t going to change the head angle. The last thing I’d be doing is fitting one. Why are you worried about the price of the Clark’s brakes on the Neon? MBR and Bike Radar have done reviews. XL should be fine for you. Ride comfort will be down to tyre size and pressure.  

Cycleops said: Don’t know why a hybrid without a suspension fork would be ‘super squirrelly’, perhaps any owners on here could comment if they’ve encountered this phenomenon. A suspension fork isn’t going to change the head angle. The last thing I’d be doing is fitting one. Why are you worried about the price of the Clark’s brakes on the Neon? MBR and Bike Radar have done reviews. XL should be fine for you. Ride comfort will be down to tyre size and pressure. Click to expand...

Bonefish Blues

Bonefish Blues

Banging donk.

The Lithium comes from the MTB end of the spectrum, so if I were going to fit suspension to any of them (and I wouldn't), then that's probably the best suited to your requirements.  

Active Member

I have a trek fx 2 probably my fave.. I tend to do a lot of cycling down back ruff country roads I find the bike can takes the bumps and handles well in bad weather also feels very easy to ride can go on long rides with it.. seems to roll forever. where as my road bike when I go over a bump I know about and slips around at bit on poor roads in bad weather, but fx2 not as fast if speeds a thing. Fx feels very relaxed and stable to ride  

si_c

Bit of a bargain there. Just need some pics now.  

CanucksTraveller

CanucksTraveller

Macho business donkey wrestler.

Bit late now since you bought it already but I've got both an older FX3 and a newer Giant Escape, I'd describe niether of them as squirrelly and in fact they're both really benign in handling. Neither are an off road bike but they'll both do tracks and they're both loads of fun. My FX was my London commuter years back. I'd never think to retrofit a suspension fork, if I wanted to do proper off road I'd have bought a bike that was designed and fitted with one, but it's niether here nor there as you'll have your reasons, anyway it sounds like you're enjoying your new Trek, so have fun!  

Tbh it is squirrelly when compared to 1982 steel road bike. But miles better than lithium, that thing was build for navigating ant swarms without killing one.  

kayakerles

Have a nice ride.

742F7CF1-5DB0-485F-A29F-9B15532B9245.jpeg

@kayakerles I broke a steel fork about 20 years ago, but I did take road bike(flat bar converted) to a MTB racing event, and next day on a pothole front wheel run away from me!! steerer tube snapped on the bottom bearing.  

8D25EC61-EFBC-4A6A-825E-799D481D873E.jpeg

Similar threads

dhd.evans1

  • This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register. By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies. Accept Learn more…

FX is a perfect bike for commuting, exploring local bike paths, or even training for a longer charity or century ride. The robust FX lineup offers a range of models with particular strengths and purposes that ensure there’s a perfect option for everyone. This simple guide is a starting point in answering the question—which FX is right for me? Find your rider profile below, and visit your local retailer to test-ride the suggested options before making your final decision.

Cruise, workout, get outside

If you’re looking for incredible value along with the utility to haul essential items and the performance to include some riding in your workout routine, these models are an excellent place to start. Aluminum frames feature a comfortable riding position and are lightweight yet affordable. You’ll cruise along your favorite weekend loop effortlessly with enough cash leftover for an ice cream after every ride. Durable wheels stand up to rougher riding surfaces, while integrated mounts allow you to easily install racks, fenders, kickstands, and lights so that everything you need for your commute or shopping trip is conveniently along for the ride. These models are perfect for everyday trips and the occasional longer ride. Riders planning to take longer rides more often will appreciate the additional performance features of FX 3, which include a larger gear range, lighter and faster tires, and a vibration-damping handlebar and grips.

Perform, train, go the distance

Enthusiasts who are hoping to ride longer distances, put a serious dent in their fitness goals, or simply love riding fast also have great options in the FX lineup. Sport models offer incredibly lightweight frames—especially FX S 5 and S 6, which feature Trek’s high-performance 400 Series OCLV Carbon—along with a more aerodynamic riding position ideal for maintaining speed. Powerful flat-mount hydraulic disc brakes provide ample stopping power in any conditions, and all sport models feature a wide gear range that’s ready to rip up the open road and conquer the steepest climbs. Blendr stems allow you to easily attach a computer or smartphone directly to the handlebars, and DuoTrap S compatibility makes keeping track of your fitness goals the easiest part of your workout. Think of FX Sport models as versatile road bikes with flat handlebars. They’re ready to ride and train as hard as you are.

Commute, explore, ride anywhere

Adventurous types and committed commuters will find FX Disc models to be the best match for their do-anything attitude. Disc brakes provide superior stopping power and continue to work well in inclement weather and when dirty, meaning there are fewer limits to when and where you can ride. More capability allows the FX Disc rider the option to take their bike beyond the pavement, and the weather will never again be an excuse not to ride. Throw some fenders and racks on for an all-weather adventure machine that’s ready to explore all weekend. Even if you’re simply looking for a reliable commuter, opt for disc brakes if you live in a wet climate or spend most of your time riding gravel bike paths. The advantages of disc brakes shouldn’t be reserved for only the most dedicated riders, so nearly every FX model is offered in a disc option.

Women’s-specific models

Back in 2000, Trek was the first manufacturer to release a full line of bikes designed specifically for women. We’ve been at it ever since, and those years of experience inform the design of the entire FX Women’s lineup. One of the things we’ve learned is that there isn’t a bike that’s perfect for women across the board. Any bike a woman rides is a women’s bike. That said, FX Women’s models include more than distinct paint schemes. Touchpoints are the parts of the bike that you come in direct contact with, and they play a major role in determining your comfort level while riding. Women’s models come stock with saddles, grips, and handlebars that are designed and sized to be more comfortable for most women. Visit your local retailer and test-ride a few women’s-specific and mainline models to see which look and feel you prefer. With so many choices, you’re sure to find an FX that fits you perfectly.

trek fx 2 vs 3 reddit

Based on frame geometry and build specs.

A bike with lower gearing will be easier to ride up steep hills, while a higher top end means it will pedal faster down hills.

Dual Sport 2 Gen 5

(descending)

Based on build material and quality level of the frame, fork, wheelset, groupset, suspension system, and more.

Two Wheels Better

Trek FX Vs. Verve: Complete Comparison! [2024 Update]

October 16, 2022

Erik Bassett

Last updated: January 13th, 2024

The Trek FX, FX Sport, and Verve are fun and practical hybrids with a nice range of spec levels.

All three series are appropriate for riding in roughly the same situations : mostly pavement, at a non-racing pace, with some gravel or well-kept trails thrown in.

Riding posture is the biggest practical difference. The FX and FX Sport prioritize efficiency whereas the Verve prioritizes comfort —something I’ll cover at length below. That’s not to say the FX is uncomfortable or the Verve is slow. Rather, they have some geometry and component differences that tilt the balance one way or the other.

This guide will cover what stands out to me in terms of value, suitability, or overall riding experience, so you can find the right model for you .

This article might contain affiliate links. As a member of programs including Amazon Associates, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Trek Verve, FX & FX Sport compared

Verve for relaxed, everyday riding & commuting.

The Verve series has more upright posture, slightly swept-back handlebars, and wider tires that hint at traditional city bikes. Consider the Verve if you like the concept of a classic Dutch bike , but need something much lighter, livelier, and more affordable.

trek fx 2 vs 3 reddit

It’s a terrifically practical bike, and livelier than any beach cruiser, but perhaps still too relaxed to satisfy performance-oriented riders.

FX for sportier riding & commuting

The FX models use slightly aggressive, forward-leaning posture that’s more efficient and nimble. If you ride for sport as much as transportation, or you need more nimble handling for hectic downtown traffic, then you should feel at home on an FX.

trek fx 2 vs 3 reddit

Posture is moderately forward-leaning, as on a mountain bike. Most riders find that pleasant enough, but it won’t feel as relaxed and comfortable as the Verve.

FX Sport for all-out speed (or just enjoying the best)

Finally, if what gets you excited is an ultra-light flat-bar road bike for chasing PRs and even venturing onto some gravel , then the FX Sport (one of today’s lightest hybrids ) might be right up your alley.

trek fx 2 vs 3 reddit

It would be a top-tier commuter…but the lack of rack mounts reduces its utility.

My quick picks

The FX 1 and Verve 1 are terrific budget options —not just within the Trek range, but overall. The more relaxed, comfy Verve and the livelier-feeling FX have long been my favorite affordable hybrids on the market.

Rather than flashy components or cutting-edge materials, your money buys a reliable and versatile bike that’s easy to upgrade if you like , but will keep most riders happy off the shelf.

But unlike cheap-o Target bikes , they’re from a supremely reputable brand that’s sold (and serviced) worldwide.

If weight is a goal and budget’s not, then the FX Sport 6 has nearly all the lightweight goodies money can buy. By my reckoning, it’s the third-lightest hybrid around, losing out to Specialized and Canyon by only a pound or so. It adds a grand onto the already high price tags of the FX 4 and 5…but if you’re looking for the best , then simply buying it is usually more satisfying than going halfway.

Finally, if you have the budget for thoughtful upgrades but aren’t keen to go all out, then the Verve 3 and FX 3 are the best value . Both have meaningful drivetrain and brake upgrades over their cheaper variations.

Frame and fork

The FX line shares an aluminum frame made of Trek’s proprietary Alpha Gold alloy. The FX 2 and 3 add internal cable routing, which is a nice aesthetic touch that’s worth the mild headache when it comes time to replace cables.

Forks do differ, with steel on the FX 1, aluminum on the FX 2, and carbon on the FX 3. Carbon’s obviously the lightest, and in my general experience, it provides the best vibration dampening of the three: better than aluminum, and generally better than entry-level steel. Take that with a grain of salt, since I haven’t been able to test all three FX variations side-by-side.

The FX Sport uses an identical carbon frame and fork across the line.

Finally, the Verve line also shares an aluminum frame, and the Verve 2 and 3 offer a lighter aluminum fork compared to steel on the Verve 1.

Notes on weight

Weight varies by size, but you can expect:

  • Verve: 30–32 lbs
  • FX 1 and 2: 26–27 lbs
  • FX 3: 25 lbs
  • FX Sport 4 and 5: 22–24 lbs
  • FX Sport 6: < 21 lbs

Pragmatically, bicycle weight matters far less than marketers (and many cyclists) would have you believe. Wheel and tire weight does affect acceleration, since it’s exponentially more work to start mass rotating versus merely moving forward. Otherwise, unless you’re regularly picking the bike up, a couple pounds in the frame and fork won’t make a meaningful difference while riding.

Granted, more upright bikes like the Verve will feel slower since their posture is less aerodynamic. They also happen to weigh more, but it’s just a coincidence. Any perceived sluggishness has more to do with posture and less to do with weight . (They’re also more comfortable, so less efficiency is just a trade-off, not necessarily a problem.)

Finally, before paying top dollar to shave weight, consider what racks, accessories, and cargo you’ll carry . A few pounds’ difference between two bikes—say, the FX 1 and FX Sport 4—might seem like a lot, but it’s a tiny percentage by the time you throw on a pannier and baskets full of groceries.

Geometry & sizing comparison

I find that geometry affects ride quality at least as much as the frame and fork material or weight. You can tweak it with seatpost and bar/stem changes, but you can’t fundamentally change it, so geometry might be the single most important thing to understand when comparing bikes.

Verve geometry: long & relaxed with a convenient step-through option

The Verve is available with a step-over or step-through frame, with sizes S-XL for riders approximately 5’1″ to 6’6″. The step-through version adds an XS option for riders down to 4’10”, so there’s an option for probably 99% of adults and older children.

I applaud Trek for not calling the Verve step-through a “women’s” bike. Men—myself included—often ride step-through frames for the sheer convenience of mounting and dismounting with cargo or a child on the back!

The Verve has noticeably longer chainstays and a slightly longer effective top tube than the FX/FX Sport or most other hybrids. I find that these longer-wheelbase bikes have a smoother, predictable feel in general. Length only becomes a liability in racing situations or technical singletrack, but those are far outside the intended use of these and all other hybrids.

The Verve’s 70.5° head tube angle is about one degree slacker than most hybrids’. This cooperates with the long wheelbase and taller front end to make steering feel a bit steadier , especially at high speeds.

The seat tube angle varies by size (that’s typical) but is a bit more relaxed than on other hybrids. That helps maintain a decent hip angle relative to the higher handlebars.

FX geometry: a quintessential, versatile hybrid

The FX comes in step-over or “stagger” (low-step) options. Both come in sizes S-L for riders 5’1″-6’1″, and the step-over FX extends to XXL for those between 6’1″ and 6’8″.

If you were to write down the archetypical hybrid bike geometry, it would probably resemble that of the FX. Everything, from head and seat tube angle (74° and 71.5° on a medium) to the 450mm chainstays, are more relaxed and generous than on a road bike , but still lively enough for weaving through traffic (if that’s your thing).

Some low-step sizes get 1° slacker head tubes than their step-over counterparts, but that isolated difference won’t be too apparent, and certainly won’t be a game-changer.

The low-step FX Stagger models are not true step-through frames. They’ve got far more standover clearance, but aren’t that much easier to swing a leg through. If you want low clearance for getting on and off, then go with the low-step Verve instead.

FX Sport geometry: a surprisingly steady feel

As for the FX Sport, it’s strictly a step-over design , in keeping with practically all high-performance carbon bikes. Sizes XS-XL cover riders from 4’10”-6’6″, so there’s a super-light option for almost everybody—or at least everybody with the cash.

You might expect the FX Sport to share the steep angles and snappy feel of most road bikes, but that’s not the case. Its geometry is nearly identical to that of the regular FX, differing by only a few millimeters here and half a degree there.

I’m of the opinion that aggressive road-bike geometry is overrated in general, and downright undesirable with flat bars (due to their greater leverage and torque), so the FX Sport’s geometry should still keep aggressive riders happy without introducing quirks or unpredictability for less intense ones.

You can always upgrade drivetrain parts (subject to some compatibility limits), but it’s still nice to have good value and plenty of gear range out of the box.

Rather than rehashing the manufacturer’s specs, I’ll draw your attention to a few notable points.

Gear range comparison

Below are the minimum and maximum gear inches for all FX, FX Sport, and Verve models. I’ve also noted the gear configuration, although overall range (high gear inches minus low gear inches) is what really counts.

In my experience, a low under 30″ and a high above 90″ should let you pedal up and down almost anything you’ll tackle on a hybrid. All models check those boxes. To learn how to interpret these numbers, check out this guide to hybrid bike gearing .

Derailleurs

All FX and Verve models use Shimano derailleurs , but from significantly different tiers . I’m glad to see that Trek skips the entry-level Tourney rear derailleur altogether. While serviceable, I always perceive it as less crisp than its slightly upgraded siblings. (It’s manageable as a front derailleur, where shifting is less frequent and needs less precision, so the front Tourney on the Verve 1 + 2 and FX 1 doesn’t bother me.)

I believe the Acera rear derailleur on the FX 3 and Verve 3 makes a meaningful difference from the Altus on the 1-tier bikes…but not enough to justify an upgrade by itself.

On rough terrain, the FX 3’s and FX Sport 4’s clutch-equipped Deore will make a significant difference in shifting precision. The FX Sport 5’s and 6’s GRX (also clutch-equipped) is an appreciable bump up again, but not the night-and-day difference of going from no clutch to clutch in the first place.

Wheels & tires

The Verve 3, FX 3, and all FX Sports come with tubeless-ready rims . It’s still possible to set up conventional rims as tubeless, but it’s a less painful process when they’re designed for that in the first place. Rims are alloy across the board, except for the FX Sport 6, where your (considerable) money buys a carbon set from Bontrager.

The Verve comes with 700C x 45mm tires, which is also the maximum width with or without fenders. That’s a terrific size for city riding: plenty of air volume to absorb all reasonable bumps and chatter, but not so bulky as to slow you down. Sensitive riders might perceive a suppler feel from the Verve 3’s 60 tpi casings (versus 30 tpi on the 1 and 2), but I suspect few will notice and fewer will care.

The FX takes 700C tires up to 38mm without fenders or 35mm with fenders. That’s good clearance for most paved riding, although I’d like to see a few more millimeters to clear fatter tires for rougher city streets and occasional gravel adventures. The FX 3 comes with 32mm tires, as opposed to 35mm on the 1 and 2, which is on the skinner side of what I find appropriate for a modern hybrid.

The FX Sport has stock 700C x 40mm tires. That’s the maximum width with fenders. If you choose to skip fenders, then the tire clearance bumps up to 42mm—nearly as wide as the Verve! That’s quite a bit for such a speedy, pavement-focused, so you’ll be covered for any halfway-decent city street, most gravel routes, and even some gentler trails.

Other components

Beyond what I’ve already covered, you’re likeliest to notice and care about differences in braking and in the feel of the cockpit (namely, the bar and stem).

All FX, FX Sport, and Verve models (except the FX 1) have disc brakes . Hybrids generally don’t need disc brakes unless extreme terrain, sticky mud, or massive cargo are on the agenda. Still, they’re nice to have. (I’m partial to the power and modulation of hydraulic discs over entry-level mechanical. However, high-end mechanical disc brands like Avid and TRP are terrific for anything shy of extreme mountain biking.)

The FX 1’s Tektro V-brakes work terrifically when properly set up. I’ve owned many pairs on many different bikes over the years, and actually find them more powerful and better-modulating than entry-level mechanical discs.

The Verve 1 has Tektro mechanical disc brakes . They’re par for the course in this price range: definitely on the bottom end of usable mechanical discs, and less powerful than good rim brakes, but at least consistent in wet weather. Once the pads bed in with use, they’re serviceable as long as you keep them in meticulous adjustment. Consider upgrading to TRP or Avid mechanical discs if you find them inadequate…although it’s probably cheaper (and definitely easier) just to buy the hydro-equipped Verve 2 in the first place.

You’ll find hydraulic Tektros on the mid-tier Verve 2 and FX 2, and a roughly similar Promax model on the FX Sport 4. I’m not enamored of them, but they’re at least a worthwhile step up from mechanical Tektros. For my money, things start to get good with the Shimano M2xx-series hydros on the Verve 3, FX 3, and FX Sport 5 and 6.

The FX 3, Verve 3, and all FX Sport models use Bontrager IsoZone bars and grips , meaning they include foam inserts to dampen road vibrations. I strongly prefer locking grips like these, since they stay in place perfectly and are easy to remove/replace.

The IsoZone inserts are a simple (and effective) alternative to the suspension stems that some competitors offer. They do not replace proper suspension forks on rough trails, but suspension isn’t necessary for commuting, cruising, fitness riding, or most other uses that hybrids are intended for.

The FX 2 and 3 and all FX Sports have 15mm of handlebar rise and very little sweep (I’d eyeball it at ~10°). The FX 1’s 30mm of rise will feel just a hair more relaxed .

The Verve has a bit more rise—about 45mm depending on the version—but I estimate closer to 30° of sweep for a more neutral wrist angle. You’ll also get a quill stem, which does feel less stiff under power, but is far easier to raise/lower and helps further dampen vibrations.

So, what’s the better cockpit configuration? I’m partial to swept-back handlebars for any and all paved riding, so in my book, the Verve wins for posture and comfort . The wrist angle is simply more pleasant, and I don’t notice a significant difference in control.

Accessories & mounts

Finally, a few details can make it easy or hard to configure your bike for commuting or other practical uses.

Blendr mount compatibility

Besides the FX 1 and Verve 1, all models have Blendr-compatible stems . It’s a nifty mounting system that attaches one or two accessories (like a headlight, phone, and/or computer) directly to the stem rather than cluttering the handlebars.

But given how easily those things mount on their own—usually with a 1/2″- or 1″-wide rubber strap—I’ve never seen the need for a Blendr stem on my personal bikes.

Racks & fenders

All models have fender mounts , so they’re a cinch to equip for year-round rides.

As for luggage, the FX and Verve all include rack mounts . Racks are useful on their own, and perhaps more importantly, they allow for panniers, which are far more comfortable than a backpack and don’t impact handling like a basket.

Unfortunately, the all-carbon FX Sport line skips the rack mounts , so luggage options are essentially limited to a backpack. (You can roll the dice and mount a basket or rack with P-clamps…but carbon frames and forks aren’t always meant to handle forces from those angles.)

Common questions & comparison about the FX & Verve

Should i get the trek verve vs. dual sport.

They differ quite a bit in posture, but not much in performance. Consider the Gen 5 Dual Sport if you’ll regularly ride on dirt/gravel, and prefer a sportier feel than the upright Verve. Conversely, get the Verve if you prefer more upright posture or you need a step-through frame.

I would avoid the Gen 4 Dual Sport. It had a heavy, poorly performing suspension fork, and its 40 mm tires were a bit narrow for off-road use. I’ve recommend the Gen 5 Dual Sport only because Trek switched to a rigid fork and bumped up to 2.0″ (~50 mm) tires.

How about the Dual Sport vs. FX?

The FX and the Gen 5 Dual Sport have substantially similar riding posture, so it’s a question of how much time you’ll spend on pavement versus dirt/gravel.

If you stick to pavement and you like a sportier feel, then the FX still makes sense. Otherwise, if you spend significant time off-road or just want a smoother feel over nasty pavement, the Dual Sport is a terrific option.

Note that between the two, only the FX has a step-through option.

Is it worth upgrading to the Trek Verve 2 vs. Verve 1?

If the extra $200 isn’t a big deal, then I recommend the Verve 2 over the Verve 1. The biggest upgrade is hydraulic disc brakes, which greatly outperform mechanical at this price range. And the Shimano Altus rear derailleur feels modestly but appreciably crisper than the budget Shimano Tourney—especially when shifting over bumpy ground.

The Verve 2 also adds a suspension seatpost, but I wouldn’t let that guide the decision. In my experience, sprung saddles are preferable on upright bikes since they don’t affect leg extension.

Is the Trek FX 1 or FX 2 a better deal?

Budget permitting, I’d pick the FX 2. I staunchly believe the FX 1 is a great value at its price point, but those with extra cash will appreciate the FX 2’s hydraulic disc brakes (vs. rim), slightly more dependable Shimano Altus M2000 derailleur (vs. Altus M210), and nearly two-pound weight savings.

And what about the FX 2 vs. FX 3?

The differences between the FX 2 and FX 3 are more marginal. If price is a concern at all, then stick with the FX 2 and use the savings for apparel or accessories .

To be fair, the FX 3 has a couple of legitimately nice upgrades that I don’t mind paying for. It swaps the aluminum fork for vibration-dampening carbon fiber, and uses a more modern 1×10 drivetrain with the terrific Shimano Deore rear derailleur. But those are incremental improvements, not game-changers.

Summary: Trek FX vs. Verve

I consider all FX, FX Sport, and Verve models good examples of their style and price point . You may find arguably better specs for your money with some direct-to-consumer brands (I’m partial to Priority and Brooklyn) but you’ll sacrifice the convenience and easy test-rides of mainstream bike-shop brands.

The FX and Verve are both terrific for commuting, leisure riding, and fitness/training. Choosing between them comes down to maximizing speed versus comfort . They’re actually more similar than not, but the Verve will keep you slightly more upright. That’s easier on the back and neck, but can feel slow when accelerating or battling a headwind. Don’t worry: the Verve is far from a beach cruiser , so you’ll have no problem climbing hills or navigating tight spaces.

The FX and FX Sport will encourage moderately forward-leaning posture (albeit less aggressive than any drop-bar road bike), which most of us will find more efficient but also less comfortable.

I consider the Verve 3 and FX 3 the best value . On a tighter budget, the Verve 1 and FX 1 remain outstanding choices , especially if you won’t encounter steep hills and foul weather where high-end disc brakes really count. If money’s no object—and you can live without rack mounts—then the FX Sport 6 spares almost no expense to create a snappy and featherweight package.

TwoWheelsWarrior

Trek Dual Sport 2 vs. FX 2: A Comprehensive Comparison

trek fx 2 vs 3 reddit

If you want a versatile bike that can handle smooth and rough surfaces, you might be interested in the Trek Dual Sport 2 and the Trek FX 2. These hybrid bikes combine features of road and mountain bikes, but they have some differences that make them suitable for different types of riders.

We will compare the Trek Dual Sport 2 and the Trek FX 2 in detail. By the end of this post, you Will have a better idea of which bike is right for you.

Table of Contents

Frame and Design

The Trek Dual Sport 2 and the Trek FX 2 are both lightweight and durable aluminum frames. However, the Dual Sport 2 has a more upright geometry that gives it a relaxed and stable ride, while the FX 2 has a more aggressive geometry that gives it a fast and responsive ride.

The Dual Sport 2 has a suspension fork that provides 63 mm of travel to smooth out bumps and vibrations, whereas the FX 2 has a rigid fork that reduces weight and improves efficiency.

The Dual Sport 2 has a tire clearance of 45c, which allows it to fit wider tires for better traction and comfort on rough surfaces. The FX 2 has a tire clearance of 35c, which limits it to narrower tires for lower rolling resistance and speed on smooth surfaces.

Related: Trek Dual Sport 2 vs. Giant Roam 2: Compared

Performance on Various Terrains

The Trek Dual Sport 2 and the Trek FX 2 can handle different types of terrains, but they excel in different areas.

The Dual Sport 2 is more suitable for off-road riding, as it has a suspension fork that absorbs shock, wider tires that grip well on loose gravel or mud, and hydraulic disc brakes that provide powerful and consistent stopping power in all weather conditions.

The FX 2 is fit for on-road riding, as it has a rigid fork that improves efficiency, narrower tires that roll faster on pavement or asphalt, and hydraulic disc brakes that offer precise and reliable braking performance.

The Dual Sport 2 has a lockout feature on the fork that allows it to switch to a rigid mode when riding on smooth surfaces, while the FX 2 has a flat mount disc brake system that reduces weight and improves aerodynamics.

Components and Features

The Trek Dual Sport 2 and the Trek FX 2 have similar components and features, as they both use Shimano Acera derailleurs, Shimano Altus shifters, Shimano MT200 hydraulic disc brakes , Bontrager alloy handlebars, stems, seat posts, saddles, pedals, and grips.

Yet, there are some differences in the drivetrain and wheelset.

The Dual Sport 2 has a 3×8 drivetrain with a forged alloy crankset that offers a wide range of gears for different terrains and gradients, whereas the FX 2 has a 3×9 drivetrain with a forged alloy crankset that offers more precise shifting and higher speeds.

The Dual Sport 2 has Bontrager Connection wheels with Bontrager GR1 Comp tires that are durable and versatile for mixed surfaces. The FX 2 has Bontrager Tubeless Ready wheels with Bontrager H2 Hard-Case Lite tires that are puncture-resistant and smooth-rolling for paved surfaces.

Related: Trek Dual Sport 3 vs. Marlin 7: Compared

Comfort and Ergonomics

The Trek Dual Sport 2 and the Trek FX 2 offer different comfort levels and ergonomics depending on your riding style and preference.

The Dual Sport 2 offers more comfort and stability with a more upright geometry that reduces stress on your back, neck, shoulders, wrists, and hands. It also has a suspension fork that cushions your ride, wider tires that absorb vibrations, and a Bontrager Sport saddle that is supportive and comfortable.

The FX 2 delivers speed and agility, with a more aggressive geometry that puts you in an aerodynamic position. It has a rigid fork that transfers your power to the road, narrower tires that reduce drag, and a Bontrager Sport saddle that is sleek and lightweight.

The Trek Dual Sport 2 costs $749 USD (as of November 2023), while the Trek FX 2 costs $629 USD (as of November 2023). The Dual Sport 2 is $100 more expensive than the FX 2, which is a significant difference for some buyers. However, the price difference reflects the different features and performance of the two bikes.

Related: Trek Dual Sport 3 vs. FX 3: A Detailed Comparison

Final Thoughts

The Trek Dual Sport 2 and the Trek FX 2 are excellent hybrid bikes that suit different types of riders. The Dual Sport 2 is suitable for off-road riding, as it has a suspension fork, wider tires, and a more upright geometry. The FX 2 is ideal for on-road riding, as it has a rigid fork, narrower tires, and a more aggressive geometry.

The Dual Sport 2 is expensive than the FX 2 but offers more versatility and comfort. The FX 2 is cheaper than the Dual Sport 2 but offers more efficiency and speed.

Ultimately, choosing between the two bikes depends on your needs and preferences.

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

IMAGES

  1. Trek FX3 vs Trek FX2: What's The Difference?

    trek fx 2 vs 3 reddit

  2. Trek FX 2 Review

    trek fx 2 vs 3 reddit

  3. Trek FX2 Review [Updated 2023 ]

    trek fx 2 vs 3 reddit

  4. Trek FX 2 2019 SALE PRICED $479.99 Reg $539.99

    trek fx 2 vs 3 reddit

  5. Trek FX 1 vs 2 vs 3 : whichbike

    trek fx 2 vs 3 reddit

  6. 2021 Trek FX 2 Disc

    trek fx 2 vs 3 reddit

VIDEO

  1. ionk wtf happen bcs it said ma live chat stream was disabled !

  2. 7 April 2024

  3. please like 🙏 please like #thar

  4. 2013 7.5 FX review

  5. Trek Fx Sport 6 p3

  6. Trek Fx 2 Disc 2022 Full Đồ 🔥

COMMENTS

  1. Trek FX 2 or FX 3 or other? : r/TrekBikes

    FX 3 has a carbon fiber fork, which is more comfortable than the aluminum fork on the FX 2. FX 3 has 1x10 gearing, which is much easier for inexperienced cyclists than the 2x9 gearing on the FX 2. If you want to venture off-road, the 1x10 gearing is even more valuable. FX 3 has a clutch rear derailleur, which will help keep the chain from ...

  2. Trek FX2 vs FX3 (Comparison)

    Something else that can get you there faster is the slimmer tires on the FX3. 700x32c Bontrager tires in comparison to the FX2's 700x35c. Less rubber means less weight and it also reduces road friction which translates into higher speeds. All of which goes to say that the FX3 Disc is my recommendation of these two excellent hybrids from Trek.

  3. Pure flux one or trek fx 3 equipped? Commute of which first 2 ...

    Just concerned without the ebike element the first 2 miles will be such a slog. Views appreciated - and any other recommendations! I have a pure flux one and carry shopping / panniers on a rear rack. Chugs along fine. If you want to turn off the battery you definitely feel the weight of the bike.

  4. Trek FX 3 Disc Equipped review

    Trek FX 3 Disc Equipped review - BikeRadar

  5. 2022 Trek FX 3 Review

    The 2022 FX 3 comes with a 1X10 Shimano Deore drivetrain. Shifting is incredibly smooth, and there is plenty of range for climbing mountains in Colorado. With the high end drive train, carbon fork, and thoughtful upgrades the price is $150 more than the FX 2 (Read: Trek FX 2 Review), but the upgrades make the FX 3 an incredible value. The ...

  6. Trek FX 2 Disc Equipped review: Unspectacular but effective

    The FX 2 is available with a step-through frame - in both the Equipped and standard versions - and has been updated for 2023, with the main difference from the 2021 model being a move from a ...

  7. Compare: 2020 Trek FX 2 Disc vs FX 3 Disc

    The Trek FX 2 Disc and Trek FX 3 Disc are both 700c aluminum frame fitness bikes with hydraulic disc brakes. The FX 2 Disc has an aluminum fork, better components, and higher gearing; while the FX 3 Disc has a carbon fork. Similar Bikes. Accessories. Ride Feel. Based on frame geometry and build specs. Rider Position.

  8. 2024 Trek FX3 : r/TrekBikes

    This is an adventure-biking sub dedicated to the vast world that exists between ultralight road racing and technical singletrack. All-road, crossover, gravel, monster-cross, road-plus, supple tires, steel frames, vintage bikes, hybrids, commuting, bike touring, bikepacking, fatbiking, single-speeds, fixies, Frankenbikes with ragbag parts and specs, etc. are all fair game here.

  9. Trek fx3 and the fx2 speed differences??

    1x gear trains (where there is just one chainwheel) are a relatively new development on mountain and hybrid bikes. Some might say fashion. Triple chainrings are becoming less common.

  10. Compare: 2022 Trek FX 2 Disc vs FX 3 Disc

    Bike Comparison. The Trek FX 2 Disc and Trek FX 3 Disc are both 700c aluminum frame fitness bikes with hydraulic disc brakes. The FX 2 Disc has an aluminum fork and a 2 × 9 drivetrain providing a wider range of gears, while the FX 3 Disc has a carbon fork and better components.

  11. Trek FX2 Vs FX3 [Which Bike Is Better?]

    Advantages of Trek FX2. Affordability: This bike is generally priced lower than the FX3, making it a more budget-friendly option for those seeking a reliable hybrid bike. Versatility: FX2 is designed as a versatile hybrid bike, suitable for commuting, fitness riding, and recreational cycling.

  12. Trek FX 2 Review: Ultimate Guide To The Fitness Hybrid Gravel Grinder

    Yes, the 2022 Trek FX 2 Disc is certainly worth it's $779.99 price tag. Save the extra $150 to afford the Trek FX 3 Disc. It comes with an upgraded group set and a carbon fork to eat up additional vibrations from the road. In other words, you can't go wrong with any Trek FX model.

  13. Trek FX 1 vs. 2 vs. 3 and FX Sport 4 vs. 5 vs. 6

    Buy FX 3 Disc. Also available as a step-through. The best bike from the Trek FX Sport family is the mid-range FX Sport 5 Disc, as it uses a simple 1X drivetrain and is much lighter than the FX Sport 4. While the Trek FX Sport 6 is much lighter, mainly due to the carbon wheels, it is also much more expensive.

  14. trek fx 2 2022 vs giant escape 3 vs pinnacle neon 1 vs pinnacle lithium

    Thank you all for chipping in, decided to test on large bikes, as no store had xl in stock this narrowed it down to giant escape 2 Vs Trek fx 2. In the end bought second hand FX 3 for whopping £400. Bike was advertised as needing new headset bearings and rear brakes. Headset needed adjustment.

  15. Which FX is right for me?

    Sport models offer incredibly lightweight frames—especially FX S 5 and S 6, which feature Trek's high-performance 400 Series OCLV Carbon—along with a more aerodynamic riding position ideal for maintaining speed. Powerful flat-mount hydraulic disc brakes provide ample stopping power in any conditions, and all sport models feature a wide ...

  16. Compare: 2023 Trek Dual Sport 2 Gen 5 vs FX 2 Disc

    The Trek Dual Sport 2 Gen 5 and Trek FX 2 Disc are both aluminum frame urban bikes with modest components and hydraulic disc brakes. The Dual Sport 2 Gen 5 has 650b aluminum wheels, while the FX 2 Disc has 700c aluminum wheels and higher gearing. Similar Bikes. Accessories. Ride Feel.

  17. Trek FX Vs. Verve: Complete Comparison! [2024 Update]

    The FX line shares an aluminum frame made of Trek's proprietary Alpha Gold alloy. The FX 2 and 3 add internal cable routing, which is a nice aesthetic touch that's worth the mild headache when it comes time to replace cables. Forks do differ, with steel on the FX 1, aluminum on the FX 2, and carbon on the FX 3.

  18. Trek Dual Sport 2 vs. FX 2: A Comprehensive Comparison

    The Trek Dual Sport 2 costs $749 USD (as of November 2023), while the Trek FX 2 costs $629 USD (as of November 2023). The Dual Sport 2 is $100 more expensive than the FX 2, which is a significant difference for some buyers. However, the price difference reflects the different features and performance of the two bikes.

  19. Giant talon 29 3 2024 vs Trek Marlin 5 gen 2? : r/MTB

    Giant talon 29 3 2024 vs Trek Marlin 5 gen 2? WhichBike. So ive narrowed it down to two bikes that im looking at buying here in Australia. For now its more for casual riding with my 2 kids but i dont know the difference in parts etc to make an educated choice. Giant talon 29 3 2024 vs Trek Marlin 5 gen 2? 1 Share. Add a Comment.