trek 1.5 road bike

Trek 1.5 road bike review

The Trek 1.5 is designed to be solid and dependable option for the new road cyclist, that will feel equally at home on a commute as a long Sunday ride

• Sign up to our newsletter Newsletter

If you are looking for a first road bike or solid winter steed, this is a quality frame that will last the course and not let you down. The geometry is very relaxed, with this bike better suited to all day comfort and less flexible riders. The ride is smooth, but the brakes and a couple of other minor details let the overall package down when we consider the price.

Smooth ride

Accelerates well

Tiagra shifting is good

Tubeless ready rims

Lifetime warranty on the frame

23mm tyres not 25mm

No 32t cassette

Boring styling

You can trust Cycling Weekly. Our team of experts put in hard miles testing cycling tech and will always share honest, unbiased advice to help you choose. Find out more about how we test.

Trek frames are synonymous with quality and their faith in the product is backed up by life time warranty. The frame is Trek's top drawer 'Alpha aluminium' whilst the fork is carbon fibre. In order to test the Trek 1.5 we have been riding it throughout winter, on commutes and longer training rides.

>>> The best cheap road bikes ridden and rated

The One series is Trek's base level frame and would potentially suit a large number of cyclists. If you are in the market for your first road bike, a dependable winter bike, or just something for epic sportives that won't break the bank, the Trek 1.5 is a great option. Hinting at this versatility is the inclusion of eyelets on the stays and forks, to aid the fitting of mudguards. There is also loads of mudguard/tyre clearance under the brakes. But, if you are flexible, or have good core strength you may find the upright posture this bike encourages limiting when you want to get lower and more aero.

 Geometry

The geometry of the Trek 1.5 is relaxed. For those new to cycling, this means that the horizontal reach from the saddle to the handle bars is shorter and the vertical height of the handle bars is higher. Rather than a super aggressive flat back like Bradley Wiggins , this enables the rider to sit more upright, in a more relaxed position.

This makes it ideal for new riders, who are yet to develop the core strength and flexibility that makes an aggressive position more sustainable. Our 58cm test model came with 44cm bars, which although less aerodynamic than a narrower bar, they may help add stability to overall handling to less confident riders.

>>> Complete buyer's guide to road bike groupsets

The Trek 1.5 comes fitted with a range of components. The shifters and derailleurs are Shimano Tiagra , but the chain set is FSA Vera and the brakes are unbranded callipers. We were hugely  impressed with the quality of the shifting on this bike. The FSA chainset works well in this regard with little or no flex, to hamper shifts.

We felt that the brakes let the bike down. The unbranded callipers didn't feel as responsive or stable as a Tiagra or Shimano 105  calliper. The lack of strength translates to less braking power and compromised modulation. That considered, the first thing we would upgrade on this bike would be the brakes. This is disappointing when we consider the overall price.

Our test model featured 23mm Bontrager R1 tyres. These rolled nicely and were puncture free for over a few weeks of winter riding and commuting on roads strewn with potential puncture hazards. We would have preferred to see this bike come fitted with 25mm tyres as they are stronger and can aid comfort. We do however like that Trek have equipped the bike with tubeless ready rims . Using tubeless tyres could reduce the risk of punctures.

>>> Guide to road bike tyres

The Tiagra rear cassette is 12-30t. With professionals even adopting 32t cassettes on steep mountainous days, it would be nicer if the Trek came with either a 12-32t cassette or a medium length cage rear derailleur, which would allow a 32t cassette to be fitted. Being a short cage derailleur, it is designed to only go up to 30t. This is in contrast to other bikes in a similar price range, such as the Giant Defy 3 and B'Twin Alur , which both have 32t cassettes as standard.

Ride and handling

Our favourite thing about the Trek 1.5 is the ride handling. Use of round tubes helps contribute to stiffness, whilst the carbon fork offers some dampening. The ride is very smooth, with the frame doing an excellent job of ironing out imperfections and bumps. Considering how well the frame absorbs road buzz we were pleasantly surprised to find that the bike is no slouch when you want to accelerate out the saddle either.

Compliant frames can often feel spongy when you give it the beans, but the Trek 1.5 quickly gets up to speed without any fuss. Wheels on bikes in this price range can often be bargain basement, with spokes that feel as if they are made of cooked spaghetti, but we were pleasantly surprised by the Bontrager wheels on this bike. They compliment the frame well and don't sacrifice ride quality.

Overall, the bike feels nicely balanced, with the weight centred. This is noticeable when riding uphill or track standing. Our 58cm test weighed in at a respectable 8.7kg without pedals. Cornering can feel a little tame, but will always be the case when a bike has a high front end. A lower front end enables you to lower your centre of gravity to a greater degree.

Whilst colour is subjective, we feel the Trek is rather boring to look at. The first thing that draws your eye to a bike is the way it looks and the Trek looks pretty utilitarian. Don't expect to cop admiring glances at the cafe stop. That said, plenty of us value function over form.

For more information, head over to Trek .

Thank you for reading 20 articles this month* Join now for unlimited access

Enjoy your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1

*Read 5 free articles per month without a subscription

Join now for unlimited access

Try first month for just £1 / $1 / €1

Get The Leadout Newsletter

The latest race content, interviews, features, reviews and expert buying guides, direct to your inbox!

Oliver Bridgewood - no, Doctor Oliver Bridgewood - is a PhD Chemist who discovered a love of cycling. He enjoys racing time trials, hill climbs, road races and criteriums. During his time at Cycling Weekly, he worked predominantly within the tech team, also utilising his science background to produce insightful fitness articles, before moving to an entirely video-focused role heading up the Cycling Weekly YouTube channel, where his feature-length documentary 'Project 49' was his crowning glory.  

The Visma-Lease a Bike rider was set to ride the Italian Grand Tour for the first time

By Adam Becket Published 11 April 24

'I must be as good as I once was' is not a reliable maxim when it comes to long rides, it seems

By James Shrubsall Published 11 April 24

Second at Paris-Roubaix Espoirs, just a year after his career was almost cut short, the young Brit is ready to turn pro

By Tom Davidson Published 11 April 24

Useful links

• Tour de France
• Giro d'Italia
• Vuelta a España

Buyer's Guides

• Best road bikes
• Best gravel bikes
• Best smart turbo trainers
• Best cycling computers
• Editor's Choice
• Bike Reviews
• Component Reviews
• Clothing Reviews
• Contact Future's experts
• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Cookies policy
• Advertise with us

Cycling Weekly is part of Future plc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site . © Future Publishing Limited Quay House, The Ambury, Bath BA1 1UA. All rights reserved. England and Wales company registration number 2008885.

• MAGAZINE OFFERS
• BIKE INSURANCE
• Best Products
• Maintenance
• Accessories
• Long-Term Reviews
• BikeRadar Podcast
• First Look Friday
• Bike of the Week
• Tech Features
• Routes and Rides
• Bike Galleries
• BikeRadar Bargains
• Buyer's Guides
• Fitness & Training
• Sizing & Fit
• Mountain Biking UK
• Cycling Plus

Trek 1.5 review

Build your road confidence

Joby Sessions

Guy Kesteven

Trek haven’t changed their entry-level road frame much for the past couple of years, but there are plenty of riders who want ‘sit up and beg’ comfort and relaxed handling in a road bike style, so there’s no reason they should. It wouldn’t be our first choice for more competitive work though.

Ride & handling: Comfortable enough for long rides and ideal for building confidence

There’s a fair amount of sideways flex in the Trek 1.5's tall head tube and narrow-stance fork if you bully rather than coax the steering. Starting with a downer on one small aspect of the handling is slightly unfair though, as the rest of the ride is unfailingly friendly and easy to live with.

Even Trek’s race bikes have a reputation for being more relaxed and surefooted than others and with a higher bar position and more centralised weight the 1.5 is even less threatening on descents or twisty lanes. High levels of vibration absorption in the slim, tall tubes reduce the chatter and ragged traction effect that can throw you off-line in rough conditions.

The tall cockpit height and shallow handlebar create a comfortable position when your hands are hooked into the more secure position of the drops, making the Trek a great confidence builder for those who don’t generally like to push their trust in tarmac traction. More accessible hand positions and the impressive amount of comfort for a mid-price alloy frame also make the 1.5 a welcoming place to be when you’re heading into work or putting in the long miles at the weekend.

The upright position means plenty of breathing space too, which, combined with the low complete bike weight and the extra-large rear cog on the cassette, means it cruises up steep hills surprisingly easily. Start applying pressure though and it’s less convincing. Flex from the crankset combines with a soft overall feel from the chassis – particularly when bracing bar against pedals – to take the edge off your effort before it reaches the road.

The upright position that saves your spine from too much strain but also prevents you from really putting your back into it or escaping from headwinds when you need too. However, keep your pedal revs high and your pedal pressure down and it’ll spin along quite happily. If you do use it for racing, you’ll find the fatigue reduction during the ride a bonus when you get to the run.

Chassis: Simple but relatively lightweight frameset builds a similarly light bike

Trek base the 1.5 around their H2 geometry, a higher fronted, more upright version of their H1 competition positioning. That’s the reason behind the very tall, slim head tube which is increased in effective height even further by the deep external cups of the FSA Intellaset headset on this build. Quite what extra intelligence it adds we weren’t able to confirm, but it certainly gives the bike a high brow.

There doesn’t seem to be much elaborate thinking in the tube shapes, with a round-to-straight top tube and only very slight shaping on the down tube. The D-section-to-round chainstays and oval-to-round seatstays finish at plain chunky dropouts, although the pearl and blue-black paint finish adds a dash of decorative class.

While Trek haven’t gone overboard on the external detailing or tube shaping, frame weight is still perfectly reasonable thanks to unseen butting that removes excess metal from the tube walls. Utility use is definitely still on the agenda though, and commuter use is certainly possible with rack and guard mounts at the rear and mudguard eyes on the slim crowned, carbon-legged fork.

Equipment: Square-taper crankset is a disappointment at this price

It seems that the £800 bike club is operating a strict “if you ain’t wearing Shimano Tiagra, you ain’t coming in” door policy this year. While the Trek will get past the bouncers outside, a close look at the FSA Vero compact chainset makes entry through the component ‘velvet rope’ less likely. While square-taper internal bottom brackets tend to last well, they’re also prone to more creak, flex and eventual removal trauma than external cups are.

There’s loads of mudguard/fat tyre clearance under the deep drop brakes though, and cartridge pads keep them reasonably sharp in feel despite the longer arms. While the ride position is far from aero, the Bontrager rimmed wheels get fashionable bladed spokes. They also use a new Clix skewer system and the front hub uses a larger than normal cam offset and a big locking collar, which means no more messing about with skewer wind-on/wind-off, which is great for cold-fingered puncture fixing or new riders. The ‘Plus’ puncture protection on the Bontrager R1 tyres should mean flats are less likely in the first place, though.

The Bontrager Approved gear is the lowest grade of named components, but it all does a decent job. The shallow compact bend makes the dropped section on the handlebar more useable but the long stem doesn’t have an entirely positive effect on handling – it has a tendency to lurch around at really slow speeds, so be careful if you’re chasing your tail on a quick turnaround.

Share this article

• Terms & Conditions
• Subscribe to our magazines
• Manage preferences

• ALL (67 Forums)
• WHEELS & TIRES
• SPECIALIZED
• CYCLOCROSS BIKES
• TIRES & WHEELS

Trek 1.5 Road Bike

New for 2008 •Frame - Alpha Black Aluminum •Fork - Bontrager Race, carbon •Wheels - Bontrager SSR •Crank - Bontrager Sport 53/39 or 50/39/30 •Rear Derailleur - Shimano Tiagra •Sizes - 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62, 64cm •Color - Pearl White/Trek Red

• USER REVIEWS

It's a great base frame for the money. I bought mine from new in 2007 and I still love riding it (6500km last year) It's pretty bombproof and I think it still looks good despite it being 15 years old now! People have said the saddle is a weak point, but I've tried 3 alternatives now and keep coming back to the Bontrager saddle that came with the bike

The brakes are shocking, so I upgraded them to some FSA brakes, which are a marked improvement. These are soon to be replaced by some Ultegra R8000's along with all the rest of the drivetrain. I know the frame can handle such an upgrade. Swapped the wheels for some Vision Team 35's as well. These durable hoops made a huge difference to the speed and quality of the ride. When the Ultegra Gruppo turns up this week and it will feel like 'New Bike Day! I just need a new set of tyres now as I actually put the originals back on for some winter durability! They are certainly durable, but not the plushest, or speedy!

Frame is light and strong. Geometry is all day comfort.

Both derailleurs, cranks, wheel set, and brakes.

Took everything off the bike. Put on a Shimano compact double crank with just the outer 50t ring. Tectro dual pivot brakes. Old pair of Shimano 501 wheels that I installed ceramic bearings. 16t rear cog and Forte chain tension wheel. BOOM!! A single speed monster! Light (13lbs) and agile. Handles predictable and toss-able. The stiff frame makes it climb better than most single conversions. GRAB a used one and scrap the components and create your own single.

Similar Products Used:

1969 Gitane Tour de France -- Reynolds 531 1999 Schwinn Super Sport converted to 105 2005 Bianchi Giro 2008 Orbea Opal Record/Chorus mix 2014 Orbea Orca Gold

Value price, light weight

Original wheels, Break Calipers

I bought Trek 1.5 as my first roadbike and have ridden more than 3000 miles. This is great bike...comfortable and stiff frame. The price around $1000 is very valuable. After 2000 miles, I replaced original wheels to lighter ones. Then the bike has been much faster and easy to climb hills. The stopping power of original break calipers is poor. Even I replaced to good pads, I didn't see an improvement. So I am replacing to shimano's one. The calipers to fit Trek 1.5 should be a long reach calipers (57mm). So selections are limited. Don't buy regular calipers, such as Shimano105 or Ultigra.

wheels, seat,bb,

take the wheels / tyres off and throw in the bin along with the seat and factory chain as soon as you buy it. After thats done it is the best racing commuter available. Bb needs regular replacement along with drive chain but this is routine maintenace. Brillient frame a real giant killer. Axium race wheels and gps 4000s tyres are unbeatable on this frame. The tiaga groupset works well and will last longer than any other groupset. Brakes are stiff and dont flex. Cheap compedative bike.

Lightweight (my 54 is 22lbs, take it as you will), affordable, decent groupset, comfortable ride

some flex, not a great wheelset

I have a 2011 Trek 1.5 that I got for about $800 dollars during an end of season super-clearance. I bought this bike as my first road bike, and have since gotten a new bike, a 2012 Orbea Orca Bronze Di2. I used the 1.5 as a race and training bike for several seasons, and have had no major issues with it. I only have one complaint and that is the wheels seem to get out of true fairly easily. I would chalk it up to hard, constant use though more than anything. The frame is fairly light weight and handles well. I did end up lowering the bars, but that is more personal preferance than a flaw in the bike. Other than that, I've only changed the bar tape after a couple of bad crashes. It does have some flex when you are really hammering it out of the saddle, but it is nothing most people should worry about. It is a great bike for someone looking to get into the sport, or to start racing.

Orbea Orca Bronze Di2

Inexpensive, upgradeable, great beginner bike, not afraid to mess with it.

Heavy, shifting with front derailleur, wheels feel unresponsive.

2010 version. I really have enjoyed riding this bike the past 3 seasons. I ride mostly flat and rolling hills so the weight has not really been an issue but when I do climb I feel it (I weigh 68kg/150lbs). Standing in the pedals the wheels can feel a bit unresponsive and slow. I plan on upgrading them soon. It is a great entry level bike and has really allowed me to learn how to work on bikes because I am not afraid to mess with it. The front derailleur sucks. I have had major problems shifting into the small cog and even dropped the chain twice just before important climbs. Sometimes it would just freeze up and not allow me to shift. I have had it adjusted and adjusted it myself numerous times. The rear derailleur on the other hand I have never had to touch! The front brake also gave out after one season but my LBS replaced it on warranty. I dropped the bars to a more agressive riding position after 2 seasons and it made a huge difference in how the bike felt. The geometry is rather relaxed but this is good for getting used to putting in the miles. I have the white paint job and I know now I will never own another white bike. Everything shows on the frame. I would go with a darker frame color.

Light (compared to old steel bike). Decent component Tiagra components. Fast and responsive. Carbon fork makes for smooth ride. Strong - I had a crash and frame and wheels held up (tire & tube didn't.)

Need to get used to this bike's compact frame geometry. Foot on pedal can hit back of front wheel during certain turning configurations. Compact double gear-set not as conducive for hill climbing as triple.

This is my first modern road bike. Previously, I was riding a 20 year old steel Huffy 12 speed that weighed something like 33 lbs. This thing is at least 10 lbs. lighter and the difference is very noticeable. I bought it used on Craigslist so my value rating may not be realistic, but I really didn't want to spend $1k on an entry level road bike which is what this is. On the other hand, I don't understand what $4k - $6k for high-end bikes will get you, either. I plan to either replace the cassette or possibly just change the gearing a bit so I can get a lower gear that will be better for hill climbing than what comes standard with the compact double. This model came in two versions; a compact double and a triple. If you live in a hilly area, get the triple.

Very smooth ride, will coast for long time before slowing down.

The derailing system is cheap. I have a problem going up a hill and shifting to a easier gear, it will skip. I took it in twice and still have problems with it. When your going up a hill and it slips its the worst, you lose speed and and have to work harder.

Overall very nice, but still working on getting the front end dialed in. It will skip the middle gear when going up a hill and when I am shifting down.

No just cheap walmart/toys R us mountain bikes.

Stiff, lightweight frame, good value for money

Frame is possibly too stiff! Nothing else i can think of!!

I upgraded from a Kona MTB that i used for travelling to work as i wanted to start taking cycling more eriously without spending a fortune! This was the perfect bike for the price and performance it provides! The acceleration from a very stiff frame is amazing, always giving you the feeling that it wants to go faster, the only thing stopping it is my ability! Having done over a thousand miles on it i havnt had a single mechanical problem and there is very little wear and tear! The only slight downside is that the frame is possibly too stiff, i ended up with side/hip pain when riding 50+ miles! So all in all i couldnt reccommend this bike highly enough for the price, and even though it will be a while before i upgrade i would happily go with another Trek!

Price-performance ratio seems OK to me.

The mix of gear components. Trek should go with one of the Shimano series. Brakes.

The bike is a 2008, but that option was not available. Overall I´m satisfied, but you should tighten the spokes before usage. The factory Bontrager SSR are a bit loose. The brakes should also be changed. Perhaps they become better in the summer.

Earlier I had a Columbus Pinta, a local brand from Sweden. Was a bit more expensive, but the developement in the bike market since 2003 has come a long way.

Get the latest road bike reviews, news, race results, and much more by signing up for the Roadbikereview Newsletter

Hot Deals See All Hot Deals >>

Get the latest roadbike reviews, news, race results, and much more by signing up for the Roadbikereview Newsletter

• EDITORIAL REVIEWS
• CLASSIFIEDS

ABOUT ROADBIKEREVIEW

• TERMS OF USE
• PRIVACY POLICY
• ADVERTISING

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2024 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.

• Specialized
• Bridge Bikeworks
• Brooklyn Bicycle Co.
• Bunch Bikes
• CYCLE OF GOOD
• DALLINGRIDGE
• Diamondback
• Eddy Merckx
• Electric Bike Company
• EVO Bicycles
• Fahrradmanufaktur
• Flyer by Radio Flyer
• iGO Electric
• Intense 951
• JupiterBike
• Lectric eBikes
• LeMond Bicycles
• Lightweight
• View all brands
• Pivot Cycles
• Qualisports
• Quintana Roo
• Rad Power Bikes
• Raleigh Electric
• Riese & Müller
• Rocky Mountain
• Schindelhauer
• State Bicycle Co.
• Surface 604
• Urban Arrow
• Van Nicholas
• VELO DE VILLE
• Vintage Electric
• Yeti Cycles
• YT Industries

• AUS $ NZD $ USD $ CAD $ GBP £ EUR €

At a glance

Rocketing down serpentine descents, flattening hilly centuries, and leading the group ride; Trek’s 1.5 C does it all and more. Its Trek Alpha aluminum frame and carbon fork are light, stiff and velvety smooth for all-day comfort. The Bontrager wheels slice through the air and effortlessly accelerate out of turns quickly. Plus, the wide-ranging 20-speed Shimano drivetrain means you have the gears to get up the steepest hills and dual-pivot brakes ensure safety and confidence on the way back down. You’ll also love the fine Bontrager stem, bar, seatpost and saddle that make every ride a great ride.

Where To Buy

Specifications

Q: how much is a 2015 trek 1.5.

A 2015 Trek 1.5 is typically priced around $1,100 USD when new. Be sure to shop around for the best price, and also look to the used market for a great deal.

Q: What size 2015 Trek 1.5 should I get?

No comments on this bike yet. Why not be the first?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Want more road bikes in your mailbox?

The latest on road bikes delivered straight to your mailbox.

More General Bikes View All

Giant Avail Composite 2 - Women's

Head out on a local club ride, knock out a charity century, or just follow a favorite road over the horizon: Giant’s Avail Composite 2 features the goods to take…

Trek Madone SLR 9 eTap

Cervélo R3 Disc Ultegra Di2

- The R3 is a high performance allrounder, ready for everything from the Tuesday night world champs to an epic weekend ride. Light, stiff, and designed for confidence-boosting handling, this…

Deals View All

View all deals, recent posts view all.

What is Road Bike Database?

Whether you're a seasoned cyclist or just starting out, choosing the right road bike can…

Send Feedback

Have a suggestion? Looking for a bike that's not on Road Bike Database? Or perhaps you've spotted an error?

We'd love to hear from you. Let us know with the form below.

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience possible. Learn more.

About Road Bike Database

Explore, search and compare thousands of the world’s best road bikes here on Road Bike Database.

Compare prices, components, reviews, images and more on current and past road bikes. You can even share reviews, comments and questions on road bikes. View and compare a huge selection of bikes from brands such as Cervélo , BMC , Trek , Specialized and more .

We strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information for road bikes on Road Bike Database. If you’ve spotted any issues, please let us know . We also include helpful tools, such as our frame size calculator, to assist you in choosing the right road bike. Bear in mind that these tools serve as a guide and simply provide a general indication. Refer to information provided by your bike manufacturer for the most applicable information for your bike.

Bikes By Brand

Bikes by year, bikes by riding style.

• Electric Road
• folding-bike
• general-road
• general-urban
• long-tail-cargo

Bikes By Wheel Size

Popular bikes.

• 2023 Scott Sub Comfort 20 Unisex
• 2023 Co-op CTY e2.2
• 2023 Argonaut GR3 Force
• 2023 Brooklyn Bicycle Co. Wythe Fixie Bike
• 2022 CUBE SUPREME HYBRID, SLX 625
• 2021 Cannondale CAADX 2
• 2022 Bulls Crossbike Street Trapeze

Latest Bikes

• 2024 Riese & Müller Delite4 GT touring
• 2024 Riese & Müller Delite4 GT rohloff
• 2024 Riese & Müller Delite4 GT rohloff HS
• 2024 Riese & Müller Delite4 GT vario HS
• 2024 Riese & Müller Delite4 GT vario
• 2024 Riese & Müller Delite4 GT touring HS
• 2024 Riese & Müller Roadster4 Mixte vario HS

2014 Trek 1.5 review

My time with the 2014 Trek 1.5 is about to end. Over the last few months I’ve ridden over 500km on the 1.5 exactly as it arrived except for my own pedals and bottle cages.

I’ve ridden over all kinds of road conditions and surfaces and along flat roads as well as over steep and rolling hills. To cut to the chase, I’ve found the new Trek 1.5 a thoroughly likeable companion and I genuinely feel it’s an excellent step forward over the old one and for me, is a fine buy at its £875 price point.

2014 Trek 1.5

In case you haven’t read my first look post ( http://girodilento.com/2014-trek-1-5-first-ride-review/ ) I used to own the previous generation Trek 1.5, which I bought after a strong recommendation from a bike shop owner. After riding 1,000 miles on it through winter, I just didn’t like the old one to keep it. Trek have certainly fixed this with the new one and it’s been a really pleasant companion. The ride quality is smooth, the handling is composed and assured at all times. It does everything well. For the price point of £875 at retail running a Tiagra 10 speed drivetrain except for the long reach brakes (and FSA cranks) – everything works as well as you’d think it should. It’s not a super light, super stiff race bike but that’s not what it’s designed to be either.

Really a bike like this should be bread and butter for Trek and it feels like that as a product. I’m a big fan of the Trek H2 geometry as I feel it’s a sensible tweaking of race geometry for the everyday rider without going all “Sportive” and running a really high headtube. On the 56cm model I was riding, the head tube length of 170mm is actually shorter than a Cervelo R5 (in size 56cm) and it has the same head tube length as a Specialized Tarmac S-Works SL3 had – so it’s far from lofty or lengthy. I’m labouring the point a little as I’ve seen a few comments over the last few years criticising the “high” headtube on the H2 geometry and I think that’s both unfair and simply wrong. It’s certainly a height that works for me and allows me to run less spacers than a more aggressive front end would and is perfect for the target market for the bike.

Wearing some fancy Reynolds Attack wheels and looking good – Trek 1.5

The update to the frame with some Kammtail style tube shaping on the top tube and the downtube give the frame a nice modern look as well as having transformed the ride. It’s UCI certified too, which is nice if you want to race one – although I don’t think this is where the bike is at its best.

To me the new Trek 1.5 is great in a range of circumstances. I think it’s a terrific beginner’s bike – it’s comfortable, smooth riding, does everything well and so makes a great bike to find your legs on. For those of you that have now found your legs, I still think the bike has a lot of appeal. It has long drop brakes and huge clearance for running full mudguards, so can become a fine winter training bike and I do think it has a lot to offer here. The smooth riding, comfortable, good nature of the bike is perfect for winter riding. In the compact gearing I rode the bike in, it features a 12-30 cassette, which is low enough to climb the steepest of hills. I reckon it’d even make a good Audax bike – although I won’t get the chance to find out. It has rack mounts too for commuting or riding to the shops, (or carrying cakes on for your mid ride stops!) – especially once you’ve fitted your SKS Chromoplastic mudguards, which would be a perfect match for the bike. In fact it has so much mudguard clearance I reckon you might be able to get 28mm tyres and full mudguards on this bike – definitely 25mm and full guards.

The 1.5 seems very well made and finished as you’d expect from Trek and the colour scheme has been something I’ve really enjoyed too. It’s fairly masculine, but I’m a guy and I like it!

On the way up the Ashdown Forest

So it can’t all be perfect can it? Well no obviously, nothing is perfect but I think for the price point this is a bike I’d be happy to spend my own money on (I did once before!) There are some things I liked less about the bike, but unless you’re doing a no expenses spared dream build there’s usually a compromise or two.

For me the bits I liked less were really only the wheels, brake pads and the handlebars. Wheels on most bikes at this price point are not the finest. The Bontrager approved hoops that come with the 1.5 are a bit portly and not the most lively but they roll wheel and I’ve not managed to knock them out of true through a wet, wet winter that seems to have had far more of its fair share of potholes. These wheels would be something I’d upgrade, especially if you wanted something more sprightly for the summer – but they do the job adequately. For commuting and winter training they’d be just fine till your wore them out. The brake pads weren’t great and they seemed to be a bit harsh on the rims. If it were my own bike, I’d quickly swap them out for some Koolstop Salmon brakepads – which are my favourites. Very easy on the rim and lovely brake feel – not something you could say about the stock ones.

Waiting for a friend to start a ride…

The only bad thing I could find to say about 10 speed Tiagra, which shifts fantastically for the money is that I noticed when riding in the dark that the exposed cables can get in the way of the beam from my front light. They can also rattle against the bars a bit on what is otherwise a pretty quiet bike. Very minor quibbles that you don’t get on 105 level Shimano or higher as the cables are run under the handlebar tape. I didn’t find the shape of the bars quite to my liking either, they feel wider than their 42cm sizing and I found both the reach and the drops deeper than I’d like – but they do the job just fine and I probably wouldn’t change them if it was my bike.

Overall though, I’ve really enjoyed this bike. It’s smooth, comfortable, versatile, dependable and makes a fine riding companion – especially for the money. Given the fact that the frameset has a lifetime warranty – I think it’s good value too.

Out on a ride in Sussex

If this had been the 1.5 I’d bought personally back in 2012, I’m almost certain I’d still own it today and would have travelled many thousands of miles on it by now. For sure, I think it’s fine winter bike for anyone who doesn’t want to go crazy and spend a fortune on one. It’s comfortably under the £1,000 cycle to work threshold, which will make it interesting to a lot of riders in the UK. As a first bike it’s perfect because once you get fit and decide you want something lighter and faster, chuck some mudguards on this and keep it as your winter trainer. So many cyclists, myself included buy a bike around this price point, then sell it to step up to something fancier then end up looking for a winter trainer – buy one of these and that’s a job ticked off from the start. The 2014 Trek 1.5 is a fine bike for the money, I’ll miss it.

2014 Trek 1.5 – a fine bike for the money

More info from Trek here: http://www.trekbikes.com/uk/en/bikes/road/performance_race/1_series/1_5/#/uk/en/model/features?url=uk/en/bikes/road/performance_race/1_series/1_5

If you’re interested in buying, you can click through and order one from Evans Cycles (and this site gets a small commission that helps keep it running):  http://tidd.ly/1a3c4788

Thanks for reading

About The Author

girodilento

Cookies and Privacy

By visiting and using our website, you are consenting to our use of cookies in accordance to our Cookie Policy .

Guest Login

Enter Your Details to Continue as Guest

An account exists with this Email Address. Click here to continue your shopping.

Trek 1.5 C (2013) : ChooseMyBicycle.com Expert Review

Get in touch, have questions we're here to help.

Help our team understand your requirements by filling up the details below

Preferred Communication

Please Check Form Errors

Thank you! Our experts will contact you shortly

Introducing Vishnu, our dedicated Cycling Enthusiast with a long journey of riding and crafting expert bicycle reviews exclusively for ChooseMyBicycle. With an avid passion for Cycling and an unwavering commitment to staying at the forefront of Bicycle Technology, Vishnu's insightful reviews are your trusted companion in making informed choices for your next ride.

• Similar Bicycles
• Product Video
• Expert Review
• User Reviews

Things We Like

• Fantastic frame fit
• Excellent componentry
• Light weight and durable frame

Things We Don't Like

• Narrow Saddle

Frame is light but without compromising on stability and strength.

The carbon front fork drastically improved ride experience by absorbing minor vibrations and shocks.

Smooth 2x10-Speed Drivetrain

Responsive Caliper Brakes

Entry level Road Bicycle wheelset

Technical Specifications

Trending Products

Trek is without a doubt one of the biggest names in the cycling industry. Their top of the line road and mountain bicycles have made a name for themselves with tremendous performances at tours worldwide. Trek's entry level range of road bicycles is no different. And so we figured this might be the ideal brand to start our reviews with. Meet the Trek 1.5 C 2013 Road bicycle; an entry level road bicycle that, Trek claims, gives you the riding experience of a pro tour bicycle. Here's our complete lowdown

• Fantastic frame fit that could work for you irrespective of your cycling experience. Newbie or veteran? It doesn't matter.
• Excellent componentry. The Tiagra compact coupled with the 10 speed cassette makes riding a dream.
• Light weight and durable frame. The 100 series alpha aluminium and carbon fork help give you a smooth and responsive ride.
• The ride can be a little hard on bumpy roads. Wear a pair of cycling shorts to improve your ride. But if you're not going to take advantage of the performance aspect of the narrow saddle, we'd recommend a saddle change to up the comfort.

Frame, Fork and Design

To start off, you can almost instantly notice that Trek has maintained their high standard when it comes to quality and style. With a gorgeous colour combination and impeccable finish quality, the frame looks like a work of art. Trek uses their light weight 100 series alpha aluminium frame that keeps the bicycle lighter without compromising on stability and strength. We took the bicycle down a route we've done many times and the carbon front fork drastically improved ride experience by absorbing minor vibrations and shocks. And while we had amazing weather to test the bicycle, the frame does come equipped with mudguard mounts that can help you enjoy your ride irrespective of the weather. The cable routing made it convenient to carry around when we needed to take it up or down a flight of stairs.

Comfort and Fit

As far as the fit and comfort are concerned, I had absolutely no qualms. Trek's H2 Frame fit finds the perfect balance between an aggressive riding position and a comfortable upright cruising position. The head tube is a little taller and gave me a slightly more comfortable riding posture. This can reduce strain on your back and neck if you're relatively new to roadies. The saddle can feel a little hard when you ride on bumps. But this is the case on most road bicycles. There are many advantages to a hard narrow saddle compared to a wide cushioned saddle. So if you're kitted up right and the roads are good, this shouldn't be too much of a problem.

The Trek 1.5 C comes with an entry level road bicycle wheelset. If I were to upgrade any component on this bicycle, this is what I'd start with. Putting on a good set of wheels can do wonders to your riding efficiency, especially if you're looking at participating in local races.

Drivetrain, Brakes and Shifters

The bicycle features the Tiagra Compact crankset(or Tiagra Double). This means the crankset has only 2 chain rings, 50t and 34t, as opposed to the standard 3 chain ring crankset. Believe it or not, the larger 50t chainring coupled with the 10 speed cassette was more than sufficient for our test ride. To be honest, I didn't even miss the extra chain ring. And the 34t chainring provided perfect assistance on slow climbs as well. This combination should have you covered on most rides; whether you intend on riding fast or taking it easy. In addition to reducing the weight of the bicycle a tiny bit, another advantage of having just 2 chainrings is that the wear on the chain reduces and the damage caused by cross chain is greatly lowered. The Tiagra STI (Shimano Total Integration) Brake levers and shifters worked great. Needless to say, they proved to be very responsive and comfortable. The gear indicators were easy to see while riding as well.

1.5 2012 vs 1.5 C 2013

If you've already got yourself the Trek 1.5 2012 model, we'd suggest giving this one a miss. Apart from the colour and finish, there's practically no difference between the two versions. The massive price difference is the result of the import duty hike on bicycles and bicycle parts that was introduced in 2012.

I'd be lying if I said I wasn't happy riding this bicycle. I was able to ride fast when I wanted to and also felt really comfortable when I took it easy. And with the option of upgrading components around this fantastic frame, IŠ—Èd say this bicycle is a winner.

Prices are subject to change by the brand, without due notice

Found this review useful?

Connect With Our Expert

Customize Your Accessories Pick by speaking to our Bicycle Expert

We've Got Your Message. Our Expert Would Contact You In Sometime. Have A Nice Day.

Get A Sweet Deal

Want a sweet deal on a product? Reach out to us!

Search This Blog

This is the blog for Scheller's Fitness and Cycling. Find posts about events in the community, cycling products, fitness products and other interesting and useful bike and fitness information.

• 2013 Road bikes
• 2013 Trek 1.5
• 2013 trek bikes
• 2013 trek likeup
• 2013 Trek road bikes
• bike shop clarksville
• bike shop Lexington
• bike shop louisville
• scheller's

2013 Trek 1.5 Road Bike Review by Scheller's

2013 trek 1.5 road bike comes with 100 series alpha aluminum.

Nice share go to this site website link read this

Post a Comment

Our locations:, popular posts, 2014 trek 7.2 fx | bike review | scheller's fitness and cycling, 2015 trek endurance/race bike: domane pictures.

• Forum Listing
• Marketplace
• Advanced Search
• Manufacturer Forums

2008 Trek 1.5

• Add to quote

I have a 2007 Trek 1000 which is the same as a 1.2 I believe. Close to what you have. This is my first road bike and I love it. Handles well and hasn't given me any problems. Great bike if you're first getting into it. Put some good miles on it. No upgrades. Everything stock...well, except for tires. The stock ones were crappy. This spring I'm throwing down for a Madone 5.2 but hanging onto the 1000 for some commuting and rain rides. Enjoy!  

Farmer Tan said: I have a 2007 Trek 1000 which is the same as a 1.2 I believe. Close to what you have. This is my first road bike and I love it. Handles well and hasn't given me any problems. Great bike if you're first getting into it. Put some good miles on it. No upgrades. Everything stock...well, except for tires. The stock ones were crappy. This spring I'm throwing down for a Madone 5.2 but hanging onto the 1000 for some commuting and rain rides. Enjoy! Click to expand...

MANTEIGA said: Bought one last january for a winter bike.... At the time everyone thought it was a 6.9.!? (same paint job ) Click to expand...

Sora-Tiagra derailleur combo pak needs to be upgraded though..choppy throws and that little knob thing that breaks your thumb whenever you want to shift is a huge pain in the ass..... not to mention you have to shift from the hoods only... Click to expand...

other than that i absolutely loved the bike, almost 95% the same geo as madone too.... (easy transition from seasons) sadly i had to sell it to make space. miss it though. Click to expand...

Malone said: I bought one last spring for $950, and am very happy with it. The dealer gave me a big discount on some crankbrother's pedals and a Trek Incite wireless bike computer. My bike was a special order because my dealer doesn't stock 1.5, just 1.2 and 2.1. After doing some research, I felt the 1.5 was the best compromise of price vs performance. Plus I really liked the black / white / red paint. Click to expand...

The day after I took it home, I did a 39 mile benefit ride. While I loved the bike, I wasn't very impressed with the tires, so I bought a pair of Bontrager Race Lite Hard Cases. These roll faster, handle better, and are more durable. They are slightly heavier though but are flat resistant. Click to expand...

So far, I haven't had any problems with brakes, shifting, etc. But I am thinking about replacing the bar tape. The white is starting to look a little funky... Click to expand...

Enjoy your 1.5! Malone out Click to expand...

btw.. you can shift the in both directions from the drops.. just takes practice... I've got the 1.2 and did some upgrading.. straight to full rival.. I coulda had the 1.5 but the price difference wasn't worth it..  

K&K_Dad said: btw.. you can shift the in both directions from the drops.. just takes practice... I've got the 1.2 and did some upgrading.. straight to full rival.. I coulda had the 1.5 but the price difference wasn't worth it.. Click to expand...

for that price you'd be stupid not to go for the 1.5.. my seatpost is the same as yours though. I realize that there are differences in some parts but one of my biggest factors were the 2 extra mouths I have to feed. I'm glad I went with the 1.2 since now I know i'll never run shimano again(as long as I can help it). I think everyone starting out should buy a lower model end so that the next one they buy will be what they want. but I must say you definitely got a deal on yours, especially if it's NOS..  

K&K_Dad said: for that price you'd be stupid not to go for the 1.5.. my seatpost is the same as yours though. I realize that there are differences in some parts but one of my biggest factors were the 2 extra mouths I have to feed. I'm glad I went with the 1.2 since now I know i'll never run shimano again(as long as I can help it). I think everyone starting out should buy a lower model end so that the next one they buy will be what they want. but I must say you definitely got a deal on yours, especially if it's NOS.. Click to expand...

Have you considered SRAM? Ultegra is ~ 5.38 lbs and Rival is ~4.94 lbs. SRAM is nice. and now that 'Lance' is running Red you can be a super fredalicious copy cat. :lol:  

K&K_Dad said: Have you considered SRAM? Ultegra is ~ 5.38 lbs and Rival is ~4.94 lbs. SRAM is nice. and now that 'Lance' is running Red you can be a super fredalicious copy cat. :lol: Click to expand...

2ndGEN: I just purchased a 09 1.5. I noticed that the 08 and 09 1.5 in the black/red/white are almost identical. The only difference being the 09 had the new Trek logo in all black and the 08 had it in outline black. When i picked up my 1.5, i was expecting it to have a bold black logo, and it has the older outlined logo. I asked the dealer about this, and he said that Trek made a design change after catalogs were printed to go back to the outline design on this bike. Now i see the picture of your 1.5 and it has the bold logo. I normally wouldn't mind, but my trek store said that the only 08 models left over had the red/white color scheme. I paid the extra $60 to upgrade to an 09 to get the red/black/white colors. I feel like i may have been given an 08 frame. Anyone else have an 09 1.5 in red/black/white? Post a picture if you do showing the logo. Thanks!  

drmayer said: 2ndGEN: I just purchased a 09 1.5. I noticed that the 08 and 09 1.5 in the black/red/white are almost identical. The only difference being the 09 had the new Trek logo in all black and the 08 had it in outline black. Click to expand...

When i picked up my 1.5, i was expecting it to have a bold black logo, and it has the older outlined logo. I asked the dealer about this, and he said that Trek made a design change after catalogs were printed to go back to the outline design on this bike. Now i see the picture of your 1.5 and it has the bold logo. I normally wouldn't mind, but my trek store said that the only 08 models left over had the red/white color scheme. I paid the extra $60 to upgrade to an 09 to get the red/black/white colors. I feel like i may have been given an 08 frame. Anyone else have an 09 1.5 in red/black/white? Post a picture if you do showing the logo. Thanks! Click to expand...

Thanks for the verification. I will definatly be looking into this further. Not because i really care one way or the other, just that i paid the premium for the 09 to get the colors i wanted and got an 08. Edit: I found the serial #, and the first few digits are WTU07CXXXXX. What does your serial # start with?  

drmayer said: Thanks for the verification. I will definatly be looking into this further. Not because i really care one way or the other, just that i paid the premium for the 09 to get the colors i wanted and got an 08. Edit: I found the serial #, and the first few digits are WTU07CXXXXX. What does your serial # start with? Click to expand...

drmayer said: I called the Trek Store and inquired. The got back to me after talking with Trek that they have made the '09 1.5 with both logo types. I'm waiting for a response from the factory to verify. Click to expand...

I have the Bontrager Crank. Here is the response i just received from Trek: David, Thanks for writing. The 1.5 did have a mid-season change in the graphics. When I look at the '09 model on our internal website we still show the outline logo as in the attached picture. It's still an '09 though, we were just later in changing the Trek logo design. I hope you enjoy the bike and please let me know if you have any further questions. I will reply to Trek with this info.  

Another response from Trek: David, Same situation there. There really has been no change between the '08 and '09 models other then those two things which where later on in the '09 model year. Not all bikes go from a solid '08 model to an '09. They don't all get changed from year to year, sometimes we carry a particular model or color forward, as in this case. Occasionally due to supply issues or design changes small differences will occur during that time. You can find bikes with the bold letters and the Bontrager cranks as well, or vice versa the outline lettering and the FSA cranks probably from that transition period. The current white/black bike still has a 2008 part number because the model itself didn't change, just a few detail changes occurred mid production run in 2009. The black/white models never went on closeout because there was no definitive difference between the '08/'09 models until the graphics got changed and that was a running spec change, not a model year redesign or anything. Sounds like you got lucky with an "updated" '09.  

I just got "luckier"! The only weak link in the drivetrain is the front der. I came across a 6500 Ultegra front der. for $10. and the seller even brought it to me. So, that questionable part has been addressed. Correct me if I'm wong here, but the Trek site has the solid lettering for the '09 with the FSA crankset, right? And on that same site, in the archive, they have the outlined lettering with Bonty cranks. Right? Trek's response to you confused me a bit...they almost said it backwards. When I read what they wrote, it reminded me of the "These aren't the droids you're looking for" Jedi mind trick of Obi Won Kenobi in Star Wars when the StormTroopers confronted them. Wow...that's funny. I'm on their site now trying to get you the link and they've removed the Black/White bike picture for the '09 1.5. They only have the Lime/White picture (note that even the Lime/White bike has the bold lettering). http://www.trekbikes.com/int/en/bikes/road/1_series/15/ Ok...let me check the archive; Here's the 2008 with the outline lettering and the Bonty cranks spec'd. http://www.trekbikes.com/int/en/bikes/2008/archive/15# Your bike looks like a what they describe to be a 2008 to me. My bike looks like what they describe to be a 2009. Granted, it's true what they said that the bikes are basically identical (besides graphics and cranksets), but that's not the point. You paid for a 2009 and actually paid extra for a specific 2009 (color-wise). You didn't get what you wanted. I'd seek some sort of recompense. Your LBS messed up and if they aren't going to own up to it, then it should be known. Give them a chance to redeem themselves. Tell them you paid for a 2009 and got a 2008. 2008's are significantly less than 2009's and are going at great prices (again, I got mine for $725.00). Demand a 2009 bike or a refund for the difference of a leftover 2008 either in cash or in upgrades to your bike and you'll keep you mouth quiet about it or possibly even tell the world how your LBS did a great job taking care of the situation. :thumbsup:  

• ?            
• 205.1K members

Top Contributors this Month

• off.road.cc
• Dealclincher
• Fantasy Cycling

Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

• Sportive and endurance bikes
• Gravel and adventure bikes
• Urban and hybrid bikes
• Touring bikes
• Cyclocross bikes
• Electric bikes
• Folding bikes
• Fixed & singlespeed bikes
• Children's bikes
• Time trial bikes
• Accessories - misc
• Computer mounts
• Bike bags & cases
• Bottle cages
• Child seats
• Lights - front
• Lights - rear
• Lights - sets
• Pumps & CO2 inflators
• Puncture kits
• Reflectives
• Smart watches
• Stands and racks
• Arm & leg warmers
• Base layers
• Gloves - full finger
• Gloves - mitts
• Jerseys - casual
• Jerseys - long sleeve
• Jerseys - short sleeve
• Shorts & 3/4s
• Tights & longs
• Bar tape & grips
• Bottom brackets
• Brake & gear cables
• Brake & STI levers
• Brake pads & spares
• Cassettes & freewheels
• Chainsets & chainrings
• Derailleurs - front
• Derailleurs - rear
• Gear levers & shifters
• Handlebars & extensions
• Inner tubes
• Quick releases & skewers
• Energy & recovery bars
• Energy & recovery drinks
• Energy & recovery gels
• Heart rate monitors
• Hydration products
• Hydration systems
• Indoor trainers
• Power measurement
• Skincare & embrocation
• Training - misc
• Cleaning products
• Lubrication
• Tools - multitools
• Tools - Portable
• Tools - workshop
• Books, Maps & DVDs
• Camping and outdoor equipment
• Gifts & misc

The 1.2 is the middle of Trek's three 1 Series aluminium road bikes, sitting between the Shimano Claris-equipped 1.1 (£575) and the 1.5 (£750), which comes with Shimano Tiagra components.

Is it the right bike for you? We've picked out four reasons why it might be, along with a reason that might make you think twice.

1 It provides solid performance with few surprises

The 1.2 puts in a solid performance out on the road, offering a stable, predictable ride, the only real disappointment being the lack of braking power (see below).

Hitting the scales at 9.48kg (20.9lb), the 1.2 isn't as lively as many lighter bikes, but for £650 this is certainly a decent enough weight. Compared to bikes of a similar price, it accelerates well. You'll find a little more flex in the frame and fork than in higher level models in Trek's range, but this is a bike that's well capable of holding its own when you crank up the power.

You could't say that the 1.2 is the fastest climber but it's far from sluggish when things get lumpy. It's helped in its hill-climbing endeavours by a compact chainset (with 50-tooth and 34-tooth chainrings rather than 52 or 53 and 39). Most bikes of this price come with something similar these days. Matched up to an 11-28-tooth cassette, it'll allow you to get up the vast majority of gradients without your knees popping or your lungs bursting, while still providing enough big gears to keep you bowling along quickly on the flat and downhill.

Aluminium frames have a reputation for feeling harsh but that's a gross generalisation. Some are jarring – as some carbon frames are – but plenty aren't. This bike is certainly comfortable enough for racking up the big miles.

For a start, it comes in Trek's H2 fit. That requires a brief explanation. Compared to Trek's H1 fit, H2 has a taller head tube: 3cm taller in the case of our 58cm test model. Why? It puts you into a more upright riding position with less strain on your lower back and neck. You could achieve a similar position by adding a bunch of headset spacers on an H1 bike, but if you want your bars at that height, you're better off going for an H2 fit because the front end will be stiffer and the handling will be better.

The Bontrager Race VR-C alloy handlebar has a shallower drop than usual too: 124mm rather than the 145mm you get on Bontrager's Race Lite Classic, for example. That means it's that much easier to get down on the drops. A lot of people have a bar with a deep drop and rarely take their hands off the hoods.

The other reason for the comfort is that the 1.2 is inherently pretty smooth. Sure, there are plenty of bikes out there that will filter our more road vibration but this one does a decent enough job on that front. Swapping the 23mm tyres for 25s would add more comfort but this bike isn't crying out for them by any means.

The Bontrager Gel Cork bar tape provides good cushioning for your hands and the Bontrager Affinity 1 saddle has plenty of padding too. Truth be told, I found it a little too soft, verging on squidgy, but everyone has their own taste when it comes to saddles.

2 You get a neat, well-proven frame and fork

All three bikes in the 1 Series share the same 100 Series Alpha Aluminium frame. It's fairly busy looking with a squared off upper edge to the down tube that makes it resemble that of Trek's more costly Madone.

The top tube slopes towards the seat tube junction and tapers down as it does so, and slim seatstays provide compliance at the back.

You get mounts for a mudguard and a rack back there too. They'll be useful if you want to ride the bike year round and perhaps carry stuff to and from work on a daily commute.

You don't get the oversized bottom bracket or tapered head tube that are regular features designed to add stiffness to higher-end performance bikes, but this is a £650 bike and the frame is good for the money. The welds are pretty tidy throughout and the same can be said of the paint job.

The fork is Trek's own with carbon blades and an alloy steerer. Like the frame, it comes with eyelets for fitting mudguards that will save a lot of faffing.

It's worth noting that the Trek 1.2 is available in eight sizes from 47cm up to 62cm. That range will cover nearly everyone.

3 Shimano's Sora shifters and mechs are excellent for the money

Nine-speed Sora is Shimano's fifth tier road groupset (if you don't count the electronic variants) and it offers fantastic value for money.

Back in the olden days (before last year), you changed gear on Sora by pushing the brake lever to the side or by using a small thumb lever on the side of the shifter body, depending on the direction you wanted to shift.

Now, though, Sora levers are Dual Control, so instead of that thumb lever, there's a lever tucked behind the brake lever. It's the same design that Shimano use right up to top-level Dura-Ace and it's a big improvement, making it far easier to change gear from the drops.

Resting your hands on the hoods is comfortable and there's a little gear indicator on the top of each of the levers that you might find useful. I can't say I ever checked them – I just couldn't get into the habit – but they're there if you want to.

Whereas the gear cables run underneath the bar tape on Shimano's higher level groupsets, they head out from the side of the levers with Sora and loop around to the frame in the fresh air. That's certainly not a problem from a functional point of view, although visually it's a less tidy way of doing things. That's being picky, though. Sora shifting has taken a massive leap forward with this latest design. It works very much like the highest level offerings from Shimano, just adding a little weight. Even there, the difference isn't massive.

Trek don't give you a complete Sora groupset here, just the shifters and mechs. The chainset is FSA Vero, a square taper design that does its job just fine, and the brakes, as mentioned, are unbranded.

Most other big brand bikes at this price, such as the Giant Defy 3 (£649) and the Felt F95 (£649), have Shimano Sora components too. It's worth comparing the spec sheets to see exactly how they match up, but don't buy a bike solely on that basis.

4 Bontrager's wheels and other components are good, reliable kit

The wheels are made up from Bontrager's own alloy hubs, containing cup and cone (rather than cartridge) bearings, and Tubeless Ready http://www.bontrager.com/technology/why_tubeless_ready rims. That means you can run the wheels without inner tubes at some point in the future, although you'll need to upgrade to Tubeless Ready tyres first.

The tyres that come fitted as standard are Bontrager's T1s (700 x 23). They're some pretty hefty rubber, made for durability rather than all-out speed, but they're reasonably resistant to punctures and they hold the road well even in damp conditions.

I had no problems at all with the wheels during the month-long test period. They're not the lightest wheels ever, taking some coaxing up to speed, but they're still as round and as true as they were out of the box, and there's a lot to be said for trouble-free operation. Fast wheels aren't so fast when you're standing on the side of the road trying to remove a broken spoke.

Most of the rest of the kit is no-nonsense stuff from Bontrager too, the handlebar, stem and seatpost being reliable alloy options and the Affinity 1 saddle providing at least as much cushioning as most people will want.

And the compromises

There are no two ways about it, the 1.2's brakes are disappointing. Trek have put the Shimano Sora theme to one side here and specced nameless dual pivot callipers that lack bite. Don't get me wrong, they're consistent and they'll stop you, just not as quickly as you might like. You have to engage the brakes for a bit longer than normal or pull the levers a bit harder to get down to your desired speed.

You adjust to this within a ride or two and don't really think about it until you ride with people who have better brakes on their bikes, or jump back on to a bike with better brakes yourself. Then you're struck by the contrast.

Swapping the brake pads helps, but the bottom line is that these brakes are a compromise to make a price point and, for me, they're the weakest aspect of the entire bike.

Other compromises? There's nothing that really stands out. Trek offer a decent all-round package here.

The Trek 1.2 is a very good bike for the money. The frame and fork are sound, reliable options and the Sora shifters and mechs are better than anything previously available for this kind of cash. They're a great example of the benefits of trickle down technology.

Yes, if you pay a couple of hundred pounds more you'll get a lighter bike that leaps into life more eagerly when you up the intensity for a sprint or tough climb, but that's always the way. As it is, the Trek 1.2 is a very able road bike that'll reward your efforts with decent speed, and it's comfortable enough to ride all day long. The fact that it comes with mudguard and rack eyelets increases its versatility, so you can use it as a year-round workhorse if that's what you're after.

We'd have no hesitation recommending this bike for someone after their first proper road bike, or for anyone else looking for plenty of value.

Very good value, ideal for anyone looking for a first real road bike, with just the brakes as a low point

If you're thinking of buying this product using a cashback deal why not use the road.cc Top Cashback page and get some top cashback while helping to support your favourite independent cycling website

road.cc test report

Make and model: Trek 1.2

Size tested: 58

About the bike

State the frame and fork material and method of construction. List the components used to build up the bike.

Frame 100 Series Alpha Aluminium

Fork Trek carbon road

Sizes 47, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62cm

Front hub Bontrager alloy

Rear hub Bontrager alloy

Rims Bontrager Tubeless Ready

Tyres Bontrager T1, 700x23c

Shifters Shimano Sora, 9 speed

Front derailleur Shimano Sora

Rear derailleur Shimano Sora

Crank FSA Vero, 50/39/30 (triple)

Cassette SRAM PG-950, 11-28, 9 speed

Pedals Nylon body w/alloy cage, toe-clip/strap

Chain KMC X9

Bontrager Affinity 1

Seatpost Bontrager Alloy, 2-bolt head, 27.2mm, 8mm offset

Handlebar Bontrager Race, VR-C, 31.8mm

Stem Bontrager Elite Blendr, w/computer & light mounts, 31.8mm, 7 degree

Headset 1-1/8" semi-cartridge bearings

Brakeset Alloy dual-pivot

Accessories

Bar tape Bontrager gel cork tape

Tell us what the bike is for, and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own feelings about the bike?

Trek say: "1 Series aluminium road bikes feature the same aero shaping and race-ready detail as our top-end bikes. They're strong, light, and built to fly over the pavement," [Trek, being from the US, use "pavement" to mean the surface of a road rather than a path].

Frame and fork

Tell us about the build quality and finish of the frame and fork?

It's a tried and tested frame built to a high quality. The same goes for the carbon leg/alloy steerer fork.

Tell us about the materials used in the frame and fork?

The frame is made from aluminium: what Trek call 100 Series Alpha Aluminium.

Tell us about the geometry of the frame and fork?

The 1.2 is built to Trek's H2 geometry that I've explained in the body of the review. Essentially, it's slightly more relaxed than a full-on aggressive race position, but it's still speed orientated.

How was the bike in terms of height and reach? How did it compare to other bikes of the same stated size?

It's a little taller at the front end than a traditional low and stretched road bike.

Riding the bike

Was the bike comfortable to ride? Tell us how you felt about the ride quality.

I found it comfortable both in terms of ride position and ride quality. It's certainly a long way from being a bone shaker.

Did the bike feel stiff in the right places? Did any part of the bike feel too stiff or too flexible?

It's not mega-stiff but it's not too flexy either.

Which components had the most effect (good or bad) on the bike's comfort? would you recommend any changes?

I found the saddle a touch too squidgy for my taste, but I'd rather that than too firm.

In all of these marks, I'm comparing the bike to similarly priced alternatives.

The drivetrain

Wheels and tyres, your summary.

Did you enjoy riding the bike? Yes.

Would you consider buying the bike? It would certainly be on my shortlist if I was after a bike at about this price.

Would you recommend the bike to a friend? I'd recommend it should be on their shortlist too.

Anything further to say about the bike in conclusion?

Nearly all big brand bikes at this price have these features: aluminium frame, fork with carbon legs and alloy steerer, an incomplete Shimano Sora groupset (chainset and brakes being the most frequent omissions), in-house aluminium handlebar, stem and seatpost. If you simply compare spec lists, you'll see that the 1.2 comes out better than some and not quite as well as others.

However, we'd caution against making a decision based solely on a comparison of spec sheets. We've not reviewed all of the 1.2's chief rivals, but we can tell you that this bike will provide you with a very good all-round performance, the brakes being the only real low point.

Overall rating: 8 /10

About the tester

Age: 43   Height: 190cm   Weight: 75kg

I usually ride:    My best bike is:

I've been riding for: Over 20 years   I ride: Most days   I would class myself as: Expert

I regularly do the following types of riding: commuting, club rides, sportives, general fitness riding,

Help us to fund our site

We’ve noticed you’re using an ad blocker. If you like road.cc, but you don’t like ads, please consider subscribing to the site to support us directly. As a subscriber you can read road.cc ad-free, from as little as £1.99. 

If you don’t want to subscribe, please turn your ad blocker off. The revenue from adverts helps to fund our site.

Help us to bring you the best cycling content

If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £1.99. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.

Mat has been in cycling media since 1996, on titles including BikeRadar, Total Bike, Total Mountain Bike, What Mountain Bike and Mountain Biking UK, and he has been editor of 220 Triathlon and Cycling Plus. Mat has been road.cc technical editor for over a decade, testing bikes, fettling the latest kit, and trying out the most up-to-the-minute clothing. We send him off around the world to get all the news from launches and shows too. He has won his category in Ironman UK 70.3 and finished on the podium in both marathons he has run. Mat is a Cambridge graduate who did a post-grad in magazine journalism, and he is a winner of the Cycling Media Award for Specialist Online Writer. Now over 50, he's riding road and gravel bikes most days for fun and fitness rather than training for competitions.

Add new comment

13 comments.

I'm riding this bike now for over 6 years. Inexpensive when bought for  €600. Needed maintenance about 2 years ago which was about €400 (new wheelset, cassette/chain/cabling etc). I've replaced the 700x23-tyres by 700x25-tyres a long time ago without changing anything else. Works like a charm.

Great value for the money but brakes could indeed be better. Meanwhile looking to add a new bike (and use this one solely on the Tacx) with disc-brakes.

• Log in or register to post comments

The current Trek 1 Series bikes have plenty of clearance for fixed mudguards, even with a 25mm tyre. The 2013 1.2 had little clearance, and this was because Trek used the 2 series frame for that particular year. I'm guessing evo_playa has one of these. Agree that SKS Raceblade Long guards are great. The lack of availability is due to a redesign - SKS are developing the new version to allow for bikes with disc brakes. I gather they won't be available until this autumn at the earliest. UK distributors sold out of the old versions months ago.

Seems like a comparable spec and set up to other value bikes. Agree that even low spec bikes are good and has recently made me question my prior choice of 105 or nothing. Anyone know if Claris is any good ? Always found the Trek styling a bit bland but this one looks ok. The latest B twin road bikes seem anazing value if your in the market for a new bike. www.tinpony.co.uk/shop

Tin Pony wrote: Seems like a comparable spec and set up to other value bikes. Agree that even low spec bikes are good and has recently made me question my prior choice of 105 or nothing. Anyone know if Claris is any good ? Always found the Trek styling a bit bland but this one looks ok. The latest B twin road bikes seem anazing value if your in the market for a new bike. www.tinpony.co.uk/shop

The 8 speed Sora front and rear Derailleurs on my Trek are long since worn out and were replaced with Claris just before the winter kicked in. It works really smooth with no problems - even on the old Sora shifters with thumb button.

I've had the 2011 1.1 with shimano 2300 (remember that?) for just over 4 years now, and it certainly scrubs up well. Even with just 2300 and a different wheelset I've raced on it for a couple of years to some success, it certainly doesn't feel like it holds me back, which is very impressive for such a cheap machine. In fact, I like it enough to complete the change to 5700 groupset in the spring.

I can't say I ever had a problem with the brake calipers, and I can't tell the difference between the alloy calipers and the Shimano long drop calipers having swapped them out- they are certainly good enough.

However, I'm not a fan of the H2 fit with the massive head tube- I hate long head tubes and was lucky to get mine before they were introduced.

Excellent winter trainer and commuter. My 2007 Trek 1.2 is still going strong - it's had a few minor changes but still has the Sora 8 speed with thumb button - oh and a pannier rack!

It's still a lovely bike to ride and recommended first road bike.

Not a racing bike. Sit up and beg.

WHY wouldn't they put sensible 25mm tyres on the bike?

Mike T. wrote: WHY wouldn't they put sensible 25mm tyres on the bike?

Quite. I can't really understand why they'd have clearances so tight, seems unecessary. It may be that 25mm tyres would work with some mudguards already mentioned, but probably not full guards that also help keep crud off the chainset especially in winter.

Word of warning though, if it is like my Trek 1.2 with the carbon fork you will be lucky to get a fixed mudguard that fits even though the bike has mudguard eyelets.

Clearance on the front is not good and i had to end up using Crud mudguards for the front wheel.

craigr wrote: Word of warning though, if it is like my Trek 1.2 with the carbon fork you will be lucky to get a fixed mudguard that fits even though the bike has mudguard eyelets. Clearance on the front is not good and i had to end up using Crud mudguards for the front wheel.

As ever, SKS Raceblade Longs. Sorted.

KiwiMike wrote: craigr wrote: Word of warning though, if it is like my Trek 1.2 with the carbon fork you will be lucky to get a fixed mudguard that fits even though the bike has mudguard eyelets. Clearance on the front is not good and i had to end up using Crud mudguards for the front wheel.

Tried quite a few including SKS chromeplastic ones.

edit: tracked them down, looks like instock here : http://www.tredz.co.uk/.SKS-Race-Blade-Long-Mudguard-Set_51833.htm

Fairly simple and inexpensive to swap out the substandard brake calipers.

I upgraded my Trek 1.1 to Shimano non series long drop brake calipers and the difference in braking was amazing.

Latest Comments

I've been lucky enough to own a Colnago CT1. I've also ridden some top titanium bikes, a Bianchi Infinito CV, Condor Leggero (both carbon), etc.....

Indeed - suitable cycle parking for the win!...

We just need to get a tv studio interested in making a small series about it and then maybe the police will start to investigate

I was thinking more of Rudy Project Rydon Readers or BZ Optics PHO Photochromic POLARISED Bifocal Lens or others ???

Next time my frame breaks at the offside rear dropout I'm intending to get it rewelded with more strength and a frame splitter put in on the drive...

Excellent result, and I hope the entitled dog owners and their shitty attitude to others in the public domain take note. Given their refusal to...

My wife has this very jacket and loves the shape for a female fit jacket.  

Is he only interested in customers that drive? If these failing businesses found a way to encourage their customer base to cycle they might find...

Where does that headline about 'cheapest' bike in the pro peloton come from. It's not backed up in the story - it's not even mentioned. Off the top...

Yeah just like the english government supporting the zionists committing genocide.

Related Reviews

Fara F/Road

Quick, nimble, fun, an impressive ride quality and excellent comfort – and I think it looks stunning

Factor O2 VAM

A master of climbing – but a bike that's also incredible fun and extremely capable everywhere else

Orro Venturi STC SRAM Force eTap Tailor Made 2024

Real world aerodynamics and well-designed geometry create an excellent bike that is fast and easy to ride

Pearson Forge 2024

Fast and reactive road bike in a regular-rider-focused geometry

• Bahasa Indonesia
• Slovenščina
• Science & Tech
• Russian Kitchen

Here’s how to rent a Moscow city bike

A young man rides a public bike on a Moscow street.

Finally, it’s sunny and warm in the city, and Muscovites are dusting off their bikes .If you don’t own no worries, it’s a piece of cake to rent a city bike.

1. How to rent a bike

First , you need to register on Moscow’s bike sharing website ( https://velobike.ru/en/ ), on the app (App Store, Google Play), or on a terminal. The app shows the nearest rental station to you. When registering you need to give your name, email, and mobile phone number  – the system will send you an SMS with your personal pin code. You can also add a Troika card  – you cannot pay using it but it's easier to use the system if you do have one.

Choose your bike, press “ok” on its dashboard, enter your login and password (from your SMS), or attach the registered Troika card. Wait until the beep and start riding.

If you would like to know how much time you have left, just press “ok” and you’ll see the timer and mileage.

When you finish, you don’t need to return the bike to the same station – any will do. Push the bike into the lock, press “ok” on its dashboard, and again wait for the sound (one signal means that the rental is over, three signals indicates an error). Important note: You should receive an SMS at this point end and on the bike’s dashboard “ Vozvrat ok” (“The return is ok”) will appear.

If you would like to rent an e-bike, check its battery power: A bike with green, yellow, and red indicators can ride 18 km, yellow and red – 10 km, red - 5 km. The e-bike should can only be returned to the same e-bike station. If you don’t you’ll be fined 1,000 rubles ($16).

2. Find a rental bike station

There are 430 stations across the city with over 4,300 cycles, including 260 e-bikes. You can spot them near metro stations, parks, and on touristic routes. Next to the bikes you’ll find an electronic terminal – use it to take your wheels.

3. Choose the right bike

Look at the pedals: It’s better to choose big ones with plastic spikes as they’ll stop your feet from sliding.  Then adjust the height of the bicycle saddle – and memorize the number on the bike’s ruler under the saddle. It will save you time in future.

Some Russians also note that it’s more comfortable to use the classic side kickstand instead of the center ones as it’s easier to operate.

Don’t take bikes with a twisted saddle because this is how users show that a bike needs to be repaired.  Moreover, if you see a damaged bike at a station, turn the saddle down and technical workers will understand that they need to repair it. (the phone of the helpdesk is +74959664669)

4. The money issue

The price of  renting a bike in Moscow for one day is only 150 rubles and 600 rubles for a month: It includes 30 minutes of riding. The system will freeze 1,000 rubles on your card as a safety deposit, it will be returned after the rental is over. If you plan to ride for more than 30 minutes, the extra time will be paid from your deposit. More than 30 minutes costs 30 rubles ($0.5), two hours – 100 rubles ($1.5), three hours – 450 rubles ($7), and so on. If you ride for more than 48 hours, you’ll be fined for 30,000 rubles ($480).  

The Moscow bike-sharing system accepts Visa and MasterCard. The price for the e-bike is the same.

5. Riding a bike in Moscow

It’s better to ride on the special cycling paths: You’ll find them in the city center and parks. In Russia, cyclists can ride on the right part of the roadway, as well as sidewalks. You cannot use a bike on highways (like Moscow’s Ring Road) and pedestrian areas. You should follow the traffic rules and signal before turning.

If you need to stop for a while, use the retractable cable to lock the bike. Enter the pin code to lock the cable. Enter the pin code again or attach your Troika to use the bike.

You can take your wheels on a commuter train (you need a special ticket), on the bus, and the Moscow Central Circle.

Here are some routes to inspire you to ride . 

If using any of Russia Beyond's content, partly or in full, always provide an active hyperlink to the original material.

to our newsletter!

Get the week's best stories straight to your inbox

• Wheels of change: Russia’s cycling revolution gathers speed
• I like to ride my bicycle, I like to ride my bike
• How to explore Moscow in 1 day on 2 wheels: 5 cycling routes
• Did you know that Russians invented the bike? Find out who rode it!
• How to use a Troika card on Moscow’s Metro, and other ways to buy tickets

This website uses cookies. Click here to find out more.

• General Road
• Rider Notes

2014 Trek 1.5 H2 Triple

An aluminum frame general road bike with mid-range components and rim brakes. Compare the full range

For This Bike

View more similar bikes →

A bike with lower gearing will be easier to ride up steep hills, while a higher top end means it will pedal faster down hills.

1.5 H2 Triple

Similar Bikes

(descending)

Add custom gearing

Jan 2015 · Oliver Bridgewood

The Trek 1.5 is designed to be solid and dependable option for the new road cyclist, that will feel equally at home on a commute as a long Sunday ride

Smooth ride

Accelerates well

Tiagra shifting is good

Tubeless ready rims

Lifetime warranty on the frame

23mm tyres not 25mm

No 32t cassette

Boring styling

Read Review

Last updated June 29 Not listed for 2,477 days