2002 ford excursion hood

• Shopping Cart 0

2002 Ford Excursion Hoods

• Factory Hood Panels
• Hood Shocks + Struts
• Hood Locks + Latches
• Hood Release Cables + Handles
• Hood Hinges + Springs
• Cowl Panels
• Hood Insulations
• Hood Hardware

Shop By Service Type

Popular Products

2002 Ford Excursion Hoods Reviews

• 2002 Ford Excursion Limited
• 2002 Ford Excursion XLT
• Discount Ford Excursion Aftermarket Hoods
• 2002 Ford Excursion Body Panel
• 2002 Ford Excursion Vacuum Pumps
• 2002 Ford Excursion Replacement Ignition Parts Online
• 2002 Ford Excursion Fuel System Sensors

CarParts.com will be back soon!

We apologize for the inconvenience. The CP Team is working on some upgrades to improve our service. Thank you for using CarParts.com!

You can call us at

1-866-529-0412

Reference ID: 18.6fc733e.1712426670.8f50290

Ford Excursion Fiberglass Hoods 

• Fiberglass Hoods (6)
• Duraflex (3)
• $500 and Over (6)

• Order Tracking

Ford F250 F350 Super Duty 1999-2007 Pickup Truck Excursion Hood Insulation Pad with ROUND OEM Style Clips

Write a review.

• Description

DMT black fiberglass hood insulation pad for 1999-2007 Ford Super Duty pickup trucks and Excursions  with (17) OEM style, textured head hood pad retainers.

1999 99 2000 00 2001 01 2002 02 2003 03 2004 04 2005 05 2006 06 2007 07 F250 F350

2000  2001 01 2002 02 2003 03 2004 04 2005 05 Excursion

This is our own, reverse engineered, created in CAD and die cut. This piece has perfectly cut edges. The shape is perfectly symmetrical.  Made from  automotive spec dark gray fiberglass insulation with BLACK fiberglass scrim / matt facing  insulation pad insulates heat transfer to the hood and well as reducing sound/noise. 

Our hood pads come rolled in a long box not folded. Reason I mention this is the "other company" ships thier hood pads folded. They come wrinkled with tears at the folds during storage and shipping.

Also the "other company" makes thier hood pads on a CNC knife machine. Thier pads edges and holes look like the were cut with a chainsaw from "fluffy" material. Ours are die cut with hard tooling from firm, crisp material. Don't say I didn't warn you.

NOTE: This is NOT a molded hood pad like the original. It is a nice, inexpensive functional equivalent.  See attached photo installed on our test hood. 

Shipping Rolled and shipped in a box. Not folded.

Posted by Nate Worgan on 30th Nov 2022

All of the holes lined up well and it looked good. Make sure to follow instructions to go from middle out.

Related Products

Toyota Tacoma 95-00 Pickup Truck Hood Insulation Pad with Clips

DMT black fiberglass hood insulation pad for 1995-2000 Toyota Tacoma pickup trucks with (1

Chevy 93-97 Camaro Hood Insulation Pad with ROUND OEM Style Clips

DMT NEW black fiberglass hood insulation pad for 1993-97 Chevrolet Camaro with (9) OEM sty

Chevy GMC 73-77 Pickup Truck Suburban Hood Insulation Pad & 19 Clips C10 C20 K10 K20

DMT black fiberglass hood insulation pad for 1973-77 Chevrolet and GM pickup trucks and Suburbans&nb

Chevy GMC 81-87 Pickup Truck Suburban Hood Insulation Pad with Clips C10 C20 K10 K20

DMT black fiberglass hood insulation pad for 1981-87 Chevrolet and GM pickup trucks and Suburbans&nb

Chevy GMC 78-80 Pickup Truck Suburban Hood Insulation Pad & 18 Clips C10 C20 K10 K20

DMT black fiberglass hood insulation pad for 1978-80 Chevrolet and GM pickup trucks and Suburbans&nb

How To Open Hood: 2002 Ford Excursion XLT 6.8L V10

Ford excursion model years - 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005.

Open the Hood - Locate hood latches and open the hood

Hans Angermeier is an ASE certified Maintenance and Light Repair Technician and has produced over 100,000 videos showing drivers how to fix things on their cars. He has broad expertise on basic repair procedures covering the majority of cars on the road. Over the past 10 years, Hans has been focused on building CarCareKiosk, which is visited by millions of drivers each month.

Low coolant levels is all to common - top yours up today

Did you know that the sun wears out wiper blades faster than rain? Replace your blades twice a year

Driving with your phone pressed against your ear is illegal in many places. See how to talk hands free!

Sure you can take it in for a $19 lube, but are you OK with a stripped oil pan and cheap parts in return?

• Honda City helped make these videos
• Download Ford owners manuals

This video shows you how to open the hood in your 2002 Ford Excursion. Popping the hood, or bonnet, on your Excursion is a two step process, you need to release the hood latch inside your Excursion and then you need to release the safety latch under your hood in the front of your Excursion. The video above shows you the location of both hood latches.

Sometimes, the hood on Fords gets stuck and won't pop up after the interior latch is released. If you need to open the hood with a stuck latch on your Excursion, simply pull up on the hood and it should pop up for you to release the second latch. Another option is to pull the interior hood release, then bang on the hood to see if that pops it open.

If your hood still won't open, you may have a broken hood release cable. Opening the hood on your Excursion with a broken cable requires you to use a coat hanger to reach through the grille and release the latch on the bottom of the hood latch. Sometimes, especially on older Excursions, you may have difficulty getting your hood to latch when you close it. In this case, the interior release lever on your 2002 Ford Excursion is probably stuck in the “open” position – push the release lever back and forth several times and then try to close your hood.

• Advance Auto coupon for 20% off entire order: KIOSK20

All excursions in Moscow

(feel free to get in touch via WhatsApp/Viber at +7 (915) 430-35-73)

• Search Menu
• Virtual Issues
• Advance Articles
• Supplements
• Highly Cited Articles
• Podcast Episodes
• Author Guidelines
• Submission Site
• Review Guidelines
• Open Access
• Self-Archiving Policy
• Reasons to Publish with Military Medicine
• About AMSUS
• About Military Medicine
• Become a Reviewer
• Editorial Board
• Advertising and Corporate Services
• Journals Career Network
• Journals on Oxford Academic
• Books on Oxford Academic

Article Contents

Introduction, the assault, the hostages, acknowledgments, conflict of interest statement, data availability, nord-ost: russia’s medical failure in the 2002 crisis.

The views expressed in this study are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the DoD, Department of the Army, Madigan Army Medical Center or the U.S. Government.

• Article contents
• Figures & tables
• Supplementary Data

Matthew D Turner, Jason Sapp, Nord-Ost: Russia’s Medical Failure in the 2002 Crisis, Military Medicine , 2023;, usad467, https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usad467

• Permissions Icon Permissions

The 2002 hostage crisis at a Moscow theater transfixed the attention of the world. While the initial assault, led by Spetsnaz commandos, successfully secured the building, the Russian security force’s utter failure at coordinating with medical services led to the preventable deaths of over 100 hostages.

On October 23, 2002, the musical production of Nord-Ost was performing at the Dubrovka Theatre, 1 some 5 km from the Kremlin, the very seat of Russia’s power. At the start of the second act, the theater was suddenly swarmed by armed assailants, 22 men and 19 women, led by a Chechen rebel commander named Movsar Barayev. 1 The attack was meticulously planned and executed—the Chechens had prepared for 2-3 months prior and brought with them 15 rifles, 114 grenades, 11 pistols, and even a homemade grenade launcher. 2 Within minutes, they had secured 979 hostages. 3 As Russian authorities scrambled to respond, the Chechens converted the theater into a veritable fortress. Many donned suicide belts; explosives were affixed to the theater’s columns, 1 key entry points were covered by explosives and snipers, and the explosives were constantly moved whenever hostages were released or visitors came into the building. 2

Over the next several days, Russian authorities surrounded the theater, and conditions soon began to deteriorate. Despite the releasing of some 200 hostages, supplies inside the Dubrovka quickly ran low. The orchestra pit was converted into a mass latrine, further contributing to the miserable conditions. 1 Although the Kremlin insisted that they would soon open official negotiations, President Vladimir Putin never intended to negotiate, at one point telling his cabinet that “I want to stress that Russia will not enter into any agreement with terrorists and will not yield to any blackmail.” 1

Between 05:00 and 05:15 on 26 October, 2 Russian special forces teams began pumping a powerful anesthetic gas into the Dubrovka’s air-conditioning system. The gas was not instantaneous—one hostage was able to call a local radio station some 2 min before being overwhelmed by the fumes, and some of the hostage-takers were described as screaming “Gas! Gas! Turn on the air conditioning!” One British hostage remembered the hostage-takers pointing out the dense clouds of smoke as they slowly descended from the ceiling. 4 By some accounts, a handful of the Chechens were able to don protective respirators, while others on the outskirts of the theater were not affected at all. 2

Approximately 15 min later, three separate Spetsnaz teams stormed the theater, 2 systematically eliminating most of the hostage-takers, conscious or not. 1 By 07:20, the building was deemed secure. 2 In one regard, the authorities were incredibly lucky—the terrorists had a brief window before the gas took effect in which they could have detonated the explosives and killed hundreds. Their failure to do so has been attributed to surprise, 1 a collapse in their hierarchy due to Barayev’s death during the early stages of the assault 2 or a combination of other factors.

While the initial stages of the assault succeeded, the rescue effort almost immediately fell into disorganized chaos. 1 Unsure of their orders, Spetznaz commandos began to simply carry out unconscious hostages at approximately 06:20, laying them out on the sidewalk in front of the theater. 5 Although War Veterans Hospital No. 1 stood just across the street, 2 there was no field hospital set up nearby, no triage teams had been readied, and there had been no organized preparation to distribute the hostages across the city’s healthcare network. 5 This specific failure to coordinate combat and logistical forces can be seen as part of a wider culture of miscommunication and disorganization within Russian counterinsurgency forces during both the First and Second Chechen Wars. 6

There was no evacuation available until 07:20, when the first bus full of drugged captives finally left the theater. The next two buses didn’t leave until 07:50, and hostages were still being retrieved from the theater by 11:00. 5 Even then, there were no medical personnel on board the buses, and the city’s police failed to clear traffic for the victims. The distribution of victims was also lax; some hospitals were completely overwhelmed by the influx of causalities, while others saw little more than a handful. 5

While military medics visited Moscow hospitals several hours before the raid and cryptically advised staff to increase their supplies of naloxone, 7 the authorities refused to release any further information on the gas. Initial responders were not told what chemical had been used and were not given instructions on how to treat affected hostages. 1 In contrast, the Spetnaz commandos appear to have been well prepared—reports after the incident noted that the theater’s floors were littered with empty syringes, presumably used by special forces as an antidote against exposure to the gas. 2 This failure of communication between security forces and medical personnel directly lead to the deaths of at least 125 hostages in the raid. 1 Hundreds more suffered from permanent damage to their vision and hearing. 5 For several days following the raid, authorities placed armed guards at hospitals, ordering that none of the former hostages be released. 4 To this day, the true formula of the gas remains classified. 5

It wasn’t until under 30 October, under mounting international pressure, that the Russian Health Minister declared that the gas used was a derivative of fentanyl, and thus did not violate the Chemical Weapons Convention. 4 The aerosol was likely a mixture of carfentanil and remifentanil, incredibly potent fentanyl derivatives typically used to tranquilize large animals. The Russian military had expressed an interest in these compounds since the early 1990s, 4 and should have taken the extremely lethal potential of these gases 4 into account when planning the attack. General Vladimir Vasil’ev’s assertion after the raid that the hostages needed only “a little fresh air” 5 rings hollow in this regard, particularly when the hostages, weakened by 3 days of imprisonment in miserable conditions, would have been even more susceptible to the gas. 2

In contrast, the November 15, 2015 multisite terrorist attacks in Paris, involving four separate locations and hundreds of hostages, show the lifesaving potential when civilian emergency medical services are properly coordinated with military personnel. Despite significantly less warning time than in the case of Nord-Ost, French personnel enacted the White Plan, a 20-year contingency for mass casualty scenarios. While the scale was similar to that of Nord-Ost, with 129 dead and over 300 injured, effective evacuation, triage, and treatment allowed the French response to save hundreds of lives. Even during the pivotal moments of the night, when government forces launched an assault on hostage-takers in the Bataclan concert hall, medical personnel were in active and transparent communication with both the government and the public, minimizing panic while maximizing the number of lives saved. 8 The exceptionally low hospital mortality rate can be directly attributed to the successful coordination between various emergency units that night. 9

The Nord-Ost assault was hailed as a success by the Russian government. 10 Reportedly, Russian forces were willing to accept a maximum loss of 150 hostages. 2 Against such a well-prepared and entrenched enemy, collateral damage is likely inevitable. However, the utter failure of the security forces to coordinate even rudimentary evacuation and treatment with medical services led to scores of deaths that might have been prevented with even the most basic preparation. 1

The authors have no acknowledgements.

INDIVIDUAL AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION

CPT M.D.T. compiled the research and wrote the first draft of the original manuscript. COL J.S. reviewed the manuscript, providing editing and advice. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

INSTITUTIONAL CLEARANCE

Not applicable.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Institutional review board (human subjects), institutional animal care and use committee (iacuc).

None declared.

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. All data are freely available.

Short   P : Putin . Henry Holt and Company , 2022 .

Google Scholar

Google Preview

Pilch   R , Dolnik   A : The Moscow theater hostage crisis: the perpetrators, their tactics, and the Russian response . Int Negot   2003 ; 8 ( 3 ): 577 – 611 .doi: 10.1163/1571806031310798

Snetkov   A : The image of the terrorist threat in the official Russian press: the Moscow theatre crisis (2002) and the Beslan hostage crisis (2004) . Eur Asia Stud   2007 ; 59 ( 8 ): 1349 – 65 .doi: 10.1080/09668130701655192

Riches   JR , Read   RW , Black   RM , Cooper   NJ , Timperley   CM : Analysis of clothing and urine from Moscow theatre siege casualties reveals carfentanil and remifentanil use . J Anal Toxicol   2012 ; 36 ( 9 ): 647 – 56 .doi: 10.1093/jat/bks078

Holiman   A : The case of Nord-Ost: Dubrovka and the search for answers . Eur Asia Stud   2009 ; 61 ( 2 ): 283 – 311 .doi: 10.1080/09668130802630862

Kramer   M : Guerrilla warfare, counterinsurgency and terrorism in the North Caucasus: the military dimension of the Russian–Chechen conflict . Eur Asia Stud   2005 ; 57 ( 2 ): 209 – 90 .doi: 10.1080/09668130500051833

Wax   PM , Becker   CE , Curry   SC : Unexpected “gas” casualties in Moscow: a medical toxicology perspective . Ann Emergency Med   2003 ; 41 ( 5 ): 700 – 5 .doi: 10.1067/mem.2003.148

Hirsch   M , Carli   P , Nizard   R , et al. : The medical response to multisite terrorist attacks in Paris . Lancet   2015 ; 386 ( 10012 ): 2535 – 8 .doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01063-6

Carli   P , Pons   F , Levraut   J , et al. : The French emergency medical services after the Paris and Nice terrorist attacks: what have we learnt?   Lancet   2017 ; 390 ( 10113 ): 2735 – 8 .doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31590-8

Tin   D , Kallenborn   Z , Hart   A , Hertelendy   AJ , Ciottone   GR : Opioid attack and the implications for counter-terrorism medicine . Prehosp Disaster Med   2021 ; 36 ( 6 ): 661 – 3 .doi: 10.1017/S1049023X21001059

Author notes

Email alerts, citing articles via, looking for your next opportunity.

• Recommend to Your Librarian

Affiliations

• Online ISSN 1930-613X
• Print ISSN 0026-4075
• Copyright © 2024 The Society of Federal Health Professionals
• About Oxford Academic
• Publish journals with us
• University press partners
• What we publish
• New features  
• Open access
• Institutional account management
• Rights and permissions
• Get help with access
• Accessibility
• Advertising
• Media enquiries
• Oxford University Press
• Oxford Languages
• University of Oxford

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide

• Copyright © 2024 Oxford University Press
• Cookie settings
• Cookie policy
• Privacy policy
• Legal notice

This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

For full access to this pdf, sign in to an existing account, or purchase an annual subscription.

• #Luxury travel
• #Unusual Moscow
• #Jewish Heritage
• #Russian traditions

As stated in ancient chronicles, in 1147, Prince Yury Dolgoruky invited his relative, Prince Svyatoslav Olgovich, to see him in Moscow, which was a small castle lost in the boundless Russian forest. Thus, the history of Russia's most important political, economic, cultural, and scientific center began. In the 12th century, Moscow turned into a fortress. By the 13th century, it was already a town, and in the 15th century, Moscow became the capital of the Russian State. Today Moscow, with its history, architectural masterpieces, and innumerable art treasures, has found itself in a whirlpool of global currents determining world development. People worldwide come to witness Moscow's splendors and fall for the charm the capital of the largest empire on earth certainly possesses.

• #Saint Petersburg

• #Russian History

• #Red Square
• #Interesting places

• #Royal resindences

• #Golden Ring
• #Special Interest

• #Bolshoi Theatre

• #Travel tips

We use cookies to improve your experience on our Website, tailor content, and measure advertising. By continuing to use our Website, you accept our Privacy Policy .

Your request has been sent successfully! Our travel expert will contact you shortly.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.