orbea vs trek mountain bike

• Help Center
• Chat with a Ride Guide
• 1-866-401-9636
• Retail Store
• Bike Services

Reset Password

We will send you an email to reset your password.

Don't have an account? Create an account

Create Account

Already have an account? Sign In

• Favorite your products & save them to your account
• Save a search & get notified when new products drop
• Be first to know about the latest events & promotions

Bike Finder

Results have arrived, orbea mountain bike buyer's guide: oiz, occam, alma & more.

Built in the Spanish Basque Country, Orbea mountain bikes are podium contenders for everything from World Cup XC to the Enduro World Series. Here's how to pick the right bike for you and your trails.

Written by: Bruce Lin

Published on: Apr 1, 2022

Posted in: Guides

Orbea has been building bikes in Mallabia, Spain for over 100 years and it has been racing them for nearly as long. Its mountain bikes have won some of the world's biggest races, including Olympic gold, and its current crop of bikes are top contenders in any off-road discipline. If you’re looking for an Orbea mountain bike, this guide will cover the differences between each model so you can pick the bike that’s best for you.

Orbea MTB models explained

[button] Shop Orbea bikes [/button]

Aluminum vs. carbon models

The Alma, Oiz, Oiz TR, Occam, and Occam LT are offered with either aluminum or carbon fiber frames. Orbea’s aluminum frames use lightweight hydroformed and triple-butted aluminum tubing while carbon frames use Orbea’s OMX or OMR carbon fiber. The OMX/OMR moniker refers to the carbon layup of the frame. OMX is the lightest and highest quality. OMR carbon is slightly heavier and marginally less stiff, but it’s more affordable. 

OMR carbon frames are 500-600 grams lighter than aluminum frames. OMX carbon frames are another 200-300 grams lighter than OMR frames. Most carbon Orbea mountain bikes use OMR carbon. Top-end (M Pro, M Team, and M LTD) Alma and Oiz models switch to OMX carbon to save additional weight. 

Aluminum and carbon models can be identified by the letter following the model name. “H” designates aluminum models and “M” designates carbon models. 

Model hierarchy 

Orbea model names are accompanied by a number indicating the component build level. Numbers will range from 50-10. Lower numbers indicate that a bike is built with nicer components. Top-of-the-line models will use “pro,” “team,” or “LTD” instead of a number. 

Example hierarchy:

29” vs. 27.5” wheels

All Orbea mountain bikes currently use 29” wheels. 27.5” models have been offered in the past, and small and medium-size XC bikes like the Alma and Oiz used to be available with 27.5” wheels. The previous generation Occam also had a 27.5” option. For the foreseeable future, however, Orbea has committed to designing all of its bikes around 29” wheels. The one exception is the Rallon enduro bike, which can run a 29”/27.5” mullet set-up .

[newsletter]

The Alma is a lightweight XC hardtail and the choice of elite racers who demand the most efficient bike. Aboard the Alma, XC legend Julien Absalon took his second Olympic gold medal in 2008 and Catharine Pendrel won the XC world championship in 2011. The latest version has kept up with industry trends, slacking out the headtube to a confidence-inspiring 68 degrees. 

The Oiz (pronounced like “Oy-eth” — the name is Basque in origin) is Orbea’s full-suspension XC race bike. It features a rear shock that is neatly recessed into the top tube to create a sleek silhouette and free up space to fit two water bottles. It also has an impressive race pedigree with several World Cup XC wins and a win at BC Bike Race.  

Orbea Oiz TR

The “TR” or trail version of Oiz adds 20mm of travel front and rear to make it more capable on descents. It can be considered Orbea’s “downcountry” bike, a cross-country bike that balances downhill performance and pedaling efficiency. It will hold its own in fast XC races, but it’s versatile enough to satisfy trail riders doing big rides on technical terrain.

Who it's for: Marathon XC racers and riders looking for an efficient but capable “downcountry” bike.

Orbea Laufey

The Laufey is Orbea’s basic aluminum trail hardtail. With a 140mm fork and a slack 65.5-degree headtube, it’s ready to tackle steep and gnarly downhills that would scare less-capable hardtails away. The robust aluminum frame and affordable builds make it a great choice for newer riders building their confidence and skills on the trail. 

Who it's for: Trail riders looking for a fun, inexpensive, easy-to-maintain hardtail trail bike.

Orbea Occam

Occam’s razor is a theory that favors simplicity. Orbea’s do-it-all Occam trail bike is aptly named. For most riders, it’s the only bike they will need, a machine that’s equally capable uphill and downhill and designed to suit the widest range of terrain. If you’re looking for a quiver-killer bike, the versatile Occam should be high on your list.

Orbea Occam LT

A lot of riders will be best-served by a quiver-killer trail bike, but some tend to favor the descents more than the climbs. To tackle tougher downhills, the Occam LT (long travel) hops up the standard Occam by adding 10mm of travel front and rear along with beefier downhill-oriented fork and shock options, blurring the line between trail and enduro.  

Who it's for: Trail riders who want a do-it-all bike with a bit of extra travel to take on the downhills. 

Orbea Rallon

To tackle steep and gnarly trails, the Rallon (pronounced “Ray-on” — named for a Spanish peak in Navarre) is equipped with long and slack geometry and plenty of travel. It’s a pure enduro race bike designed to compete against the world’s fastest riders on the toughest trails. If downhill speed is your top priority, the ultra-capable Rallon will have your back.  

No matter which Orbea you choose to ride, you’re in for a good time. Having trouble deciding which bike is right for you? Contact our expert Ride Guides at [email protected] or call (866) 401-9636. They can help you understand all the pros and cons, and find the right bike for you. Do you already own an Orbea mountain bike? Let us (and other cyclists) know in the comments what you love about it!

More Guides

Features, Gravel, Guides, Latest Apr 24, 2024

My 2024 Unbound Gravel Kit: Can Clothes Help You Ride Faster?

Features, Guides, Latest Apr 16, 2024

How I Fuel for Performance in LONG Bike Races

Features, Gravel, Guides, Latest Apr 10, 2024

The Best Gravel Bike Comfort Upgrades for Unbound (and Beyond)

FAQs, Guides, Latest, MTB Apr 3, 2024

FAQ: Top 5 Mountain Bikes That Hold Their Value

Features, Gravel, Guides, Latest Apr 1, 2024

Waxing Your Chain vs. Using Wet Lube for Dust, Mud, & Unbound Gravel

Guides Mar 26, 2024

Shimano vs. SRAM: Guide to Groupsets, Drivetrains, Brakes, and More

Features, Gravel, Guides, Latest Mar 25, 2024

1x vs. 2x: What Drivetrain Should You Race at Unbound Gravel?

Features, Gravel, Guides, Latest Mar 21, 2024

Choosing The Best Tire Setup for Racing Unbound Gravel

FAQs, Guides Mar 18, 2024

The Best Used Bike Marketplaces Online (& Offline Too) in 2024

FAQs, Guides, Latest, Road Mar 14, 2024

FAQ: The Roval Alpinist CL II vs. Roval Rapide CL II

Guides, Latest, Road, Tech Feb 23, 2024

The Best Affordable Carbon Road Wheels for Budget Racers

Features, Guides, Latest Feb 20, 2024

QUOC Shoe Review & Guide: Simple, Stylish, & Refined Cycling Shoes

New arrivals.

Certified Pre-Owned

Santa Cruz Stigmata Force 1X Carbon CC Gravel Bike - 2021, 56cm

Ibis Ripmo GX Mountain Bike - 2019, Large

Evil Chamois Hagar Gravel Bike - Medium

Trek Domane SLR 6 Gen 4 Project One Road Bike - 2023, 62cm

Pivot LES 27.5 XT Mountain Bike - 2019, Small

Giant Defy Advanced 2 Road Bike - 2022, Small

Santa Cruz Megatower C X01 Mountain Bike - 2021, X-Large

Factor Ostro VAM Road Bike - 2023, 52cm

Diamondback Haanjo 7C Carbon Gravel Bike - 2022, 53cm

Cannondale Topstone Carbon 105 Gravel Bike - 2022, Large

Trek Domane SL 6 AXS Gen 4 Road Bike - 2023, 58cm

Specialized Roubaix Road Bike - 2021, 56cm

2024 Orbea Orca vs Trek Emonda

Our bicycle maestro Bernard Lu compares the Orbea Orca and Trek Emonda, comparing the variant, features, technologies and pricing.

In this article, I’ll guide you through a comparison between the Orbea Orca and Trek Emonda ; both popular road bikes among cyclists.

I’ll walk through the Orbea Orca and Trek Emonda models lineup, their specifications, and retail pricing (USD). I’ll explain the carbon fiber technology used ( Orbea Monocoque (TorayCa) Carbon vs Trek OCLV ), and unique frameset features for each bike.

The goal is to help you get a better understanding before you make your final purchasing decision.

The latest Orbea Orca was launched in mid-July 2023, during the last week of the Tour de France.

Compared to its predecessor, the 2024 Orbea Orca is a lot lighter (832g previously vs 750g for a size 53 frame). This is achieved using a traditional-looking, round tube frame without the dropped seat stays seen on the majority of road bikes today. At 6.7kg for the top-of-the-line M11eLTD PWR model with SRAM Red AXS , it’s among the lightest, disc brake road bikes available today, alongside the likes of Cannondale Supersix Evo LAB71 and Cervelo R5 .

Like many other Orbea models, the Orbea Orca offers a lot of customization options for the riders, thanks to the MyO configurator. There are 11 models available with either Shimano or SRAM electronic shifting groupsets. The models with PWR indicate it comes with a power meter, the LTD models use the highest grade OMX carbon.

Orbea Orca vs others

2024 BMC Teammachine SLR vs Orbea Orca

2024 Cannondale Supersix Evo vs Orbea Orca

2024 Canyon Ultimate vs Orbea Orca

2024 Cervelo Soloist vs Orbea Orca

2024 Giant TCR Advanced vs Orbea Orca

2024 Orbea Orca vs Pinarello Dogma F

2024 Orbea Orca vs Pinarello F

2024 Orbea Orca vs Scott Addict RC

2024 Orbea Orca vs Specialized Aethos

2024 Orbea Orca vs Specialized Tarmac SL7

Trek Emonda

The Trek Emonda is a lightweight bike for the high mountains.

The lightest Trek Emonda frame weighs less than 700g using Trek’s OCLV 800 carbon. This is the bike Richie Porte rode to his third place in the 2020 Tour de France.

The SLR is the lightest and most expensive atop the Trek Emonda models. There are six Emonda SLR options, specced electronic shifting groupsets from SRAM or Shimano.

Next in line is the SL, the mid-range, more budget-friendly option. It has the same frame design and geometry as the SLR but uses the OCLV 500 carbon instead. The groupset choices are Shimano Ultegra Di2 , Shimano 105 Di2 , SRAM Force AXS , or SRAM Rival AXS .

The Trek Emonda SLR and SL framesets are also available separately.

Trek Emonda vs others

2024 Canyon Ultimate vs Trek Emonda

2024 Pinarello Dogma F vs Trek Emonda

2024 Pinarello F vs Trek Emonda

2024 Scott Addict RC vs Trek Emonda

2024 Specialized Aethos vs Trek Emonda

2024 Specialized Tarmac SL7 vs Trek Emonda

2024 Specialized Tarmac SL8 vs Trek Emonda

2024 Trek Emonda vs BMC Teammachine SLR

2024 Trek Emonda vs Cannondale SuperSix Evo

Orbea vs Trek carbon fiber

Orbea monocoque (torayca) carbon.

Orbea uses carbon fiber from TorayCa in their bikes. It’s one of the handful of bike manufacturers that uses a monocoque carbon fiber construction, resulting in a lighter and stiffer frameset. The two most prominent types of carbon used in Orbea’s bike frames are OMX (T1100K) and OMR (T800) carbon.

• OMX ( Orbea Monocoque X ) carbon is Orbea’s top-grade carbon fiber, with the ultimate blend of stiffness, lightness, and strength. Monocoque refers to a type of construction technique where the external skin supports the structural load, which, when applied to bike frames, results in a balance of strength and weight. Due to its high manufacturing cost, OMX carbon is typically reserved for Orbea’s top-tier models.
• OMR ( Orbea Monocoque Race ) is the standard carbon composite used by Orbea. While OMR doesn’t match the absolute performance capabilities of OMX, it offers a fantastic performance-to-value ratio. This makes it a great choice for riders looking for top-notch performance without the premium price tag of the top-grade OMX carbon.

Trek OCLV carbon

The OCLV (Optimum Compaction, Low Void) carbon is a proprietary carbon fiber manufacturing technology developed by Trek.

• Optimum Compaction refers to the heat and pressure applied during the curing process to squeeze out excess resin and ensure that the carbon layers are compacted to the optimal density.
• Low Void refers to the goal of reducing microscopic air pockets or voids that can occur in the carbon fiber and create weaknesses.

One of the key advantages of OCLV carbon is its ability to achieve an optimal balance between stiffness, strength, and weight. Trek engineers carefully tune the carbon layup and utilize varying modulus carbon fibers to create stiff frames in certain areas to maximize power transfer while maintaining compliance in other areas to enhance comfort and ride quality.

The OCLV carbon is available in 800 and 500 series.

• OCLV 800 is the highest-grade carbon fiber used by Trek. The carbon modulus is higher in OCLV 800, making it stiffer and lighter. The manufacturing process is more refined, using more advanced carbon and resins, leading to a bike frame that provides top performance levels for stiffness, weight, and strength. OCLV 800 is used in all models with SLR .
• OCLV 500 is a lower-grade carbon but still offers a high level of performance. It has a slightly lower carbon modulus, meaning it’s a bit less stiff and heavier than OCLV 800. OCLV 800 is used in all models with SL .

It’s worth noting that the different OCLV grades don’t only refer to the material itself, but also to the manufacturing techniques used to form the carbon fiber into bike frames. Higher-grade carbon requires more precise manufacturing techniques to take full advantage of its superior material properties.

Frameset technologies and innovations

Orbea Orca and Trek Emonda framesets incorporate advanced technologies to enhance their bikes’ performance and ride characteristics.

Here’s an overview of the technologies used in each bike model.

Where to buy

Orbea retailers.

• Orbea retailers . Use this tool to find your nearest Orbea dealers.
• Trek online shops . Australia, Austria, Canada, Germany, Netherlands, United Kingdom, United States
• Trek retailers . Use this tool to find your nearest Trek retailers.

Bernard Lu has 7+ years of experience working in a bicycle shop, overseeing the retail and workshop operations. He’s a qualified bicycle mechanic who understands a cyclist’s needs and speaks the same cycling lingo.

If you meet him at the cafe, he will happily talk to you for hours about all the intricacies of bikes and cycling tech. Just buy him a coffee next time you see him.

Mr. Mamil's content is for educational and entertainment purposes only. The content is not a substitute for official or professional advice. Please do your own due diligence.

Mr. Mamil participates in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites. We also participate in various other affiliate programs, and at times we earn a commission through purchases made through links on this website.

Privacy Policy

Website Terms

© Mr. Mamil, 2023

Blister Brand Guide: Orbea Mountain Bike Lineup, 2021

When considering a new mountain bike, there are so many similar-looking bikes on the market being made by so many different companies, it is virtually impossible to (1) know where to begin; (2) quickly figure out which one or two products from a given brand might work well for you; and (3) determine what products from other brands might be the most similar and also worth considering.

In our “Blister Brand Guide” series, we provide an overview of the entire product lineup of a brand and highlight how each product stands out from the rest to help you find the best women’s mountain bike or men’s best mountain bike for you .

In our individual product reviews , we go very  deep into the details of particular products. With these Brand Guides, the goal is not Depth, but Breadth. Our Brand Guides and full reviews are designed to complement each other — provide a broad overview of entire company lineups, and then also very detailed reviews of individual products. 

Our mountain bike Brand Guides are presented by CBGTrails . Learn more and start planning your trip today at cbgtrails.com , then download the CBG Trails app for info on the 750+ miles of singletrack and 150+ trails in Crested Butte and the Gunnison Valley, Colorado.

See our other MTB Brand Guides

About Orbea

Orbea was founded in 1840 by brothers Juan Manuel, Mateo, and Casimiro Orbea in Eibar, Spain. Orbea started designing and producing bicycles in 1920 after having produced rifles and guns for 90 years. They were involved in the Tour de France as early as 1934, and began making mountain bikes around 1989. 

Today, Orbea is run as a co-op, making it a unique company in the bike world. They are part of the Mondragón Cooperative Corporation, an umbrella corporation of co-ops, giving them access to many different assets from other co-op partners. Their current lineup of bikes includes mountain, road, triathlon, and urban / commuter bikes. 

Focusing on just their mountain bike lineup, they make five models ranging from an XC hardtail to a full-suspension Enduro bike. They make both alloy and carbon frames, and their build kits range from more budget-friendly, entry-level options to high-end kits with top-tier components. Build kits with an “M” in the title indicate a carbon frame, and kits with “H” in the title indicate an alloy frame. They also have the “MyO” customization program in which you can pick a unique combination of frame colors and change components to personalize your bike. All models mentioned in this guide can be customized in MyO besides the Laufey. You can also change various components of the bike to your liking in every standard build kit.

Orbea makes carbon frames in two different layups, OMR and OMX. OMR is more budget-friendly, whereas OMX is lighter and stiffer. OMX frames tend to be around 200-300 grams lighter than their OMR counterparts. 

Orbea is currently headquartered in Mallabia, Spain.

Current Warranty (for the original purchaser)

• Lifetime warranty on all frames and rigid forks
• Three year warranty on paint and finish
• For more information, visit Orbea’s warranty page . 

Orbea’s Suspension Design : 4-bar with dropout-concentric pivot

(For more on different suspension designs, see our Suspension 101 article)

Before we get into specific models and build options, here are some things to keep in mind when deciding on which build level to go with, and why.

First, when looking at complete bikes, suspension and wheels are going to make the biggest difference in how a bike really rides. Spend money on those before other things like higher-end drivetrain parts, cockpit parts (e.g., stem, handlebars, etc.), cranks, etc.

Tires make an enormous difference in performance, but are cheaper and easier to upgrade, especially since they tend to wear down quicker than other components. Upgrading a lower-end front tire to something better — and saving the original for rear-tire use — can be a good way to improve a bike while still making use of the originals, since front tires are generally a lot more important than rear tires when it comes to traction.

Drivetrain parts can be upgraded piecemeal as they wear out, or if you just want to upgrade down the line. Higher-end cassettes are mostly just lighter, while higher-end shifters and derailleurs get lighter, smoother, and sometimes last a bit longer as you go up in price.

We’ll outline here the different models in Orbea’s MTB lineup, organized from most cross-country-oriented (XC) to downhill-oriented (DH). In other words, the bikes at the top of the list are optimized to pedal and climb uphill very well, while the bikes at the bottom are optimized to handle very rough, steep, and challenging descents very well.

We’ve included some notable information for each model:

Available build kits & their MSRP

• Best Budget Build : These are the build kits that we think make the most sense for people trying to spend the least amount without ending up with a build that’s going to immediately break or need to be upgraded.
• Most Performance for the Price : These are the build kits that we think make the most sense for people seeking the best balance of performance and cost. I.e., if you don’t need to get the cheapest bike, but you also don’t need the absolute lightest bike or all the newest bling, this is the build we think makes sense for you.
• Suspension travel (e.g., 100 mm of travel, 130 mm of travel, etc.)
• Wheel size (e.g., 27.5”, 27.5+, 29”)
• Frame material options (e.g., alloy vs. carbon)
• A brief description of what the bike was designed for and any notable design details.
• Some of the bike’s most direct competitors from other brands
• Which Orbea bike it’s most similar to
• Reasons why you should buy it
• Reasons why you should not buy it

Orbea Mountain Bikes

(Most Cross-Country-Oriented to Most Downhill-Oriented)

• Front: 0-100 mm
• Rear: Hardtail
• S, M, L, XL (61.1-78” / 155-198 cm)

Orbea’s XC race hardtail, designed to be lightweight and efficient. The Alma frame was designed with a comfortable ride and efficient power transfer in mind. Features “Blocklock,” a steering limiter system to protect the frame and allow for a straighter downtube. “M LTD” build features a rigid front fork.

Consider If:

• You ride or race XC-style on more smooth trails
• You appreciate a lightweight hardtail that climbs well
• You prioritize efficiency over plushness/forgiveness

Don’t Bother If:

• You often ride or race very bumpy, steep, and/or technical trails
• You like a bike that is forgiving on descents
• M50: $2,099
• M50 Eagle: $2,099 
• M30: $2,699 – Best Budget Build
• M25: $3,199
• M Pro: $4,599 – Most Performance for the Price
• M Team: $5,899
• M LTD: $8,599
• OMX Frame: $3,099
• OMX Frame & rigid fork: $3,599
• Specialized Epic HT
• Trek Procaliber
• Santa Cruz Highball
• Scott Scale
• Norco Revolver HT
• Canyon Exceed
• Mondraker Chrono Carbon & Podium Carbon

• Front: 100 or 120 mm
• Rear: 100 or 120 mm
• 29” (27.5” available on size S)
• Alloy or Carbon

Orbea’s lightest and most efficient full-suspension bike, designed for XC racing and riding. Standard builds come with 100 mm of travel front and rear, and “TR” builds come with 120 mm of travel front and rear as well as a dropper post and a few more downhill-oriented components. Sizes M-XL can fit two water bottles in the front triangle. Higher-end kits feature a three-position remote suspension lockout. H30 and H20 builds come with 120 mm of travel front and rear, but without the dropper and more downhill-oriented components.

More like the Alma than the Laufey.

• You ride or race XC on more bumpy trails or for longer distances
• You appreciate a full-suspension bike that climbs well
• You like to push your limits of endurance and all-around speed
• You like a bike that is more forgiving on descents than it is a good climber
• The trails you ride are very rocky/rooty, steep, and/or technical
• H30: $2,799
• H20: $3,199 – Best Budget Build
• H10 TR: $3,499
• M30: $3,999
• M20 TR: $4,499
• M10: $4,999
• M10 TR: $5,199 
• M Pro: $5,999
• M Pro TR: $6,199 – Most Performance for the Price
• M Team: $7,999
• M LTD: $9,899
• OMX Frameset: $3,899
• Specialized Epic & Epic EVO
• Scott Spark RC & Spark
• Giant Anthem 29
• Cannondale Scalpel & Scalpel SE
• Santa Cruz Blur
• Pivot Mach 4 SL
• Intense Sniper XC
• Norco Revolver FS 100 & Revolver FS 120

Orbea Laufey

• Front: 140 mm
• S, M, L, XL (59.1-78” / 150-198 cm)

The Laufey is designed to be a versatile, capable, and fun hardtail with aggressive trail geometry that comes in at affordable prices. Comes with wide 2.6-inch tires with confidence-inspiring traction.

More like the Occam than the Oiz.

• You appreciate hardtails, but want one with slightly more aggressive geometry
• You often ride trails that are more steep, bumpy, and technical
• You are on a budget
• You are looking for a lightweight, efficient, XC-style hardtail
• The trails you ride are mostly smooth and flat
• You want a bike that is more forgiving on descents
• H30: $1,699
• H10: $2,199 – Best Budget Build 
• H LTD: $2,699 – Most Performance for the Price
• Specialized Fuse
• Commencal Meta HT
• Santa Cruz Chameleon 29”
• Rocky Mountain Growler
• Kona Big Honzo
• Norco Torrent HT
• Devinci Kobain HT
• Giant Fathom 29
• Canyon Stoic

Orbea Occam

• Front: 140 or 150 mm
• Rear: 140 mm

Orbea’s best Quiver Killer, the Occam is meant to handle a bit of everything. Certain builds come with a 140 mm fork, while others come with a 150 mm fork for a little more downhill capability. Features adjustable high/low geometry settings and an asymmetric frame, designed to improve stiffness and access to shock damper controls.

More like the Rallon than the Laufey.

• You’re looking for a do-it-all trail bike
• You ride a mix of terrains and styles
• You appreciate a good, fast, technical, and / or steep descent, and are willing to climb for it
• You occasionally ride lift-served bike parks or shuttle to the top of descents
• You primarily want a bike that is a quick, lightweight climber
• You want a very capable and forgiving bike that crushes descents and are willing to sacrifice some climbing ability
• H20: $3,299
• H20 Eagle: $3,299 – Best Budget Build
• H10: $3,999
• M30: $4,299
• M30 Eagle: $4,299
• M10: $5,699 – Most Performance for the Price
• M-LTD: $8,499
• OMR Frameset: $3,599
• Santa Cruz Hightower
• Trek Fuel EX
• Pivot Switchblade
• Kona Process 134 29
• Specialized Stumpjumper 
• Commencal Meta TR
• Giant Trance X 29
• Rocky Mountain Instinct
• Intense Primer 29
• YT Jeffsy 29
• Norco Sight 29
• Devinci Troy 29
• Evil The Offering
• Scott Genius 
• Cannondale Habit
• Revel Rascal
• Canyon Spectral 29
• Ibis Ripmo & Ripmo AF

Orbea Rallon

• Front: 170 mm
• Rear: 160 mm
• S/M, L, XL (63-78” / 160-198 cm)

Designed around Enduro racing, the Rallon is Orbea’s most downhill-capable bike, able to crush descents while still being able to pedal to the top. Features adjustable high/low geometry settings. [Editors note: the Rallon has been updated since posting, see our review ]

• You want a bike that is capable and forgiving on the descents
• You often ride lift-served terrain and/or like to shuttle to the top of descents
• You race Enduro and/or enjoy pushing your limits on fast, steep, chunky, and technical terrain
• The trails you ride aren’t very steep, bumpy, and technical
• You're looking for a plush freeride bike, rather than an enduro racer
• M20: $4,899 – Best Budget Build
• M10: $5,599
• M Team: $6,999 – Most Performance for the Price
• M LTD: $9,699
• Frameset: $3,899
• Specialized Enduro
• Santa Cruz Megatower
• Norco Range
• Nukeproof Giga
• Propain Spindrift
• Rocky Mountain Altitude 29″
• Intense Carbine
• Evil The Reckoning LB
• YT Capra 29
• Devinci Spartan 29
• Scott Ransom
• Transition Spire
• Canyon Strive 29
• Giant Reign 29
• Mondraker Superfoxy

1 comment on “Blister Brand Guide: Orbea Mountain Bike Lineup, 2021”

In the Alma kit section, you totally forgot to list the H models. I just bought the Alma H10 and was hoping to see your list of comparable models.

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Based on frame geometry and build specs.

A bike with lower gearing will be easier to ride up steep hills, while a higher top end means it will pedal faster down hills.

2023 Fuel EXe 9.5

2022 RISE H30

(descending)

Based on build material and quality level of the frame, fork, wheelset, groupset, suspension system, and more.

TESTED - 2023 Orbea Rise Long Term Review 21

Orbea's next-generation rise drops weight and increases integration. is it enough to remain one of the best lightweight emtbs on the market.

L aunched in 2020, the Rise was Orbea's first 'SL' (super light) eMTB offering. At the time, few brands offered models in the fresh category that Orbea deemed "less e, more bike." The bike was launched to positive reviews and quickly became a benchmark for lightweight eMTBs due to its superb ride quality, power-to-range ratio, customization options, and competitive price points. 

As eMTB technology has continued to progress, Orbea has not rested on the success of the inaugural Rise, and has continued to optimize the platform. The goal of the 2023 Rise was to decrease weight, add more battery options, and enhance overall integration, all in the name of a high-performance ride experience — a package that Orbea refers to as Rider Synergy.

We've spent the past six months testing the Rise with two different component packages (a super light trail build and a more aggressive all-mountain build) to see if the latest version continues to carry the torch as a class leader in the lightweight e-bike category.

2023 Rise Highlights

• OMR Carbon frame 
• 29-inch wheels
• 140mm (5.5 inches) of rear wheel travel // 150mm (5.9 inches) fork travel
• 65.5-degree head tube angle (150mm fork)
• 76.5-degree effective seat tube angle
• 12x148mm rear hub spacing
• Internal cable routing
• SIC Cockpit System
• 60Nm Shimano EP801 RS-Tuned Motor
• 360Wh integrated battery (540Wh battery available for + $159)
• 252Wh range extender sold separately (+ $529)
• Sizes: S-XL
• Verified weight of M-LTD Build (size L, no pedals): 35.6 lbs (16.1 kg) 
• Verified weight of MyO Build (size L, no pedals): 39 lbs (17.7 kg) 
• MSRP M-LTD Build Tested: $11,499 USD 
• MSRP of MyO Build Tested: $11,723 USD

Orbea Rise Overview

The Rise's carbon frame is constructed with Orbea's premium OMR carbon layup technique which Orbea claims improves its stiffness-to-weight ratio. While very similar aesthetically to the prior version, front triangle stiffness has been increased, and thanks to Orbea's Secure Battery System, the integrated battery's weight is now better distributed within the frame. Slimmer batteries have also allowed the downtube's waistline to shrink, resulting in a frame that is hardly distinguishable from a normal mountain bike. 

Much like their new Wild eMTB , Orbea took the opportunity to improve the integration of its technologies with the rider. An integrated cable guidance system (SIC System) presents a cleaner cable aesthetic and shorter cable lengths while maintaining the ease of maintenance or adjustability of a non-integrated cockpit. In reality, interacting with the integrated headset proved more complex than a traditional headset—more on that below when we cover swapping forks on our Rise build.  

It's hard to argue the tidiness of the cockpit and frame where only the front brake cable is exposed. The custom SIC headset also utilizes Orbea's new Spin Block, a bumper that activates at 124º, prohibiting the bar and stem from turning further than necessary, further enabling short cable lengths. The Spin Block isn’t noticeable when riding, but exists to stop the bar from spinning around in a crash or when lifting the bike. 

Sealed Enduro bearings are now used in all pivots. The heavy-duty bearings are double the cost of a standard bearing, an investment Orbea believes is well worth the long-term durability for their customers.

Shimano EP801 RS-Tuned System

The 2023 Rise maintains Shimano's EP system but updates to the new EP801 motor with the Rise-specific RS (Rider Synergy) tune. The Orbea-specific tune limits the motor's output to 60Nm. 

While the motor sees small revisions (the highlight being compatibility with Shimano's latest XT Di2 drivetrain ) , the system adds a new handlebar-mounted EN600 controller. The new remote is intuitive for changing modes by thumb and contains a power button and LED lights corresponding with assistance modes and battery level, all of which are easy to understand while on trail with a quick glance. The previous version of the Rise featured the power button low on the seat tube and a small Shimano EW-EN100 junction attached to the brake line to display assist mode. The lack of a power button in the seat tube now allows for deeper seat post insertion. A green light on the remote indicates battery life until the battery drops below 20% when it turns orange, and then red when the battery is near depletion. The new remote's power cable is routed through Orbea's OC handlebar and headset for a clean cockpit.

Shimano's E-tube smartphone app provides additional details and a slightly more accurate battery level reading. And, of course, the app allows for specific power tuning, fixing bugs, and updating software. The Rise is also compatible with Garmin computers. Interestingly, the only way to know the exact battery level is via a Garmin device. 

The Rise now uses new 21,700 cell batteries that shave weight (300g on the 360Wh) and offer a better charge and discharge ratio with improved heat management.

Our M-LTD test bike came with a 360Wh battery; however, Orbea's MyO customization program offers the choice between a 360Wh or 540Wh battery across all builds. A 252Wh range extender is also available, maxing out battery capacity at an impressive 792Wh.

When we were first introduced to the new Rise last fall during Orbea's press camp for the bigger-hitting Wild enduro eMTB, we were surprised to learn that no updates had been made to the geometry. While its reach numbers are relatively in line with today's trail bike standards, the Rise's wheelbase and chainstay run on the shorter end of the spectrum, resulting in the sizing feeling small. Furthermore, the 66°/65.5° head angle (140mm fork/150mm fork) leans conservatively, especially in modern trail bike offerings. 

According to Orbea's sizing chart, our 5'9" (175cm) tester was smack in the middle of medium and large — not the first time we've experienced this with Orbea's sizing. Being accustomed to that, we knew to go with the size Large.

Four factory-spec carbon frame builds exist, ranging from $6,999 up to $11,499. Three alloy, or Hydro, builds complete the Rise family, ranging from $5,299 to $8,799.  If none of the factory builds suit your taste, Orbea's MyO customization program offers the ability to choose specific components and create an eye-catching paint scheme. There truly is something for everyone. 

We first tested the top-level carbon build, M-LTD. The M-LTD uses the 360Wh battery with a 140mm FOX Factory 34 fork, a Float DPS inline shock, a Transfer SL dropper post, Shimano's XTR 9100 drivetrain and brakes, and Orbea's Oquo carbon wheels with Maxxis Rekon tires. We then swapped our suspension to a 150mm FOX Factory 36 fork (+$159) and Float X shock (+$45), and Maxxis Minion DHF/DHR tire combo (+$20). These options are available through MyO, but the economical way to achieve our second build would be to purchase the M-Team build for $9,999 and receive the more aggressive components from the get-go. 

Our M-LTD build weighed in at 35.6 pounds before pedals— quite impressive for an eMTB regardless of the very light-duty tires. Our second all-mountain build tipped the scale at 39 pounds. While the frame and battery do shave a small amount of weight over the previous version, the final weigh-in is not a drastic difference from the prior model which was already one of the lightest eMTB offerings. 

To see all the models lined up for comparison, check our Product Guide .

On The Trail

Throughout our six-month test, we rode a wide variety of terrain from our local Reno/Tahoe Eastern Sierra mixture of decomposed granite and rock — including many laps on fall-line singletrack and machine-built trail at Sky Tavern Bike Park — to San Francisco Bay Area tacky loam and fast flowy terrain in Oregon. 

Beginning with the lightweight M-LTD setup, we spent most of our ride time with the Float DPS rear shock's sag near 25% to reduce bottom-out. With the 34 up front, we were about 10% above FOX's suggested PSI range to keep the fork from diving. 

Upon switching to the Float X, we increased sag to 28-30% as the shock was much more supportive and forgiving. The 36 fork worked well within its suggested PSI range with a few clicks of low- and high-speed compression. 

Descending Performance

Already familiar with the previous Rise, little time was needed to adapt to the new model. Not only did familiarity play a role in its descending friendliness, but the Rise simply rides like a normal mountain bike. When the pedals aren't turning, and the motor isn't engaged, it's very easy to forget that a motor and battery are tucked into its svelte frame. The motor and battery are out of mind until it is time to climb back up and take nothing away from the bike's playfulness or cornering abilities. To say that the Rise mimics a normal mountain bike would be an understatement. It IS a mountain bike— a highly capable one that happens to have e-assist. 

Its agile personality makes it easy to change lines at a moment's notice, and the active suspension provides plenty of support and traction through rocks, roots, and technical trail obstacles. Jumping was very intuitive on the Rise and it was easy to take to the air. It's difficult to resist kicking the rear end around for some whipping action. While not designed to be a bike park bike, the Rise was a joy to blast through flowy berms and floaty jumps.

The stoutness of the rear end came into question under aggressive riding as it is not the stiffest, and throwing the bike into corners or landing off-centered on jumps made this extra flex immediately apparent.  The 65.5-degree head angle with the 150mm fork proved effective except when pointed down steep, rocky terrain. Here, we couldn't help but wonder what an extra half-degree or so of slackness could do for confidence and stability. 

Climbing Performance

To best describe the climbing performance of the Rise, imagine an incredibly lightweight and nimble trail bike, then add 1.5x power to it. Essentially turning the bike into a superpowered XC race machine, the Rise's climbing capabilities are impressive. 

While many full-power eMTBs equate to a lot of bike to handle on technical climbs (despite the benefits of the motor), the Rise is an astounding pleasure to ascend. Intuitive, much like a normal trail bike, the bike is responsive to quick input and can easily change lines while ticking off the elevation. The 29-inch wheels provide excellent traction, though the Rise's light weight does require getting the body weight up over the front of the bike on steeper climbs to keep the front tire planted. Otherwise, it's easy to find the front wheel dangling in mid-air. 

The DPS shock does feature a 3-position switch, but we never felt the need to use the climb mode. The Float X shock, being more supple, provided a bit more traction on more technical climbs. 

Shimano EP801 RS Motor Performance

Shimano's EP8 motor has been a staple in eMTBs for years, with relatively little change over time. Other than being limited to 60Nm, the EP801 RS motor in the Rise is very much status quo, which overall is a good thing.  When we first took delivery of our Rise, we were confused to find that the new motor emitted a very high-pitched sound, a whirling scream of sorts— noticeably more audible than the prior Rise we tested. We immediately brought this to Orbea's attention, and after a discussion with Shimano, Orbea had a motor swap in the works. 

Swapping the motor is fairly simple and quick, requiring a crank arm removal, a handful of bolts, and two quick wire connections. Fortunately, the replacement motor did the trick. The high-pitch sound was absent, and the motor's overall noise output was quieter than the previous Rise. Orbea informed us that our test bike was the first 2023 Rise sent to the United States before production models landed. We have been assured the issue we experienced on the first Shimano motor is not a concern for the production bikes. 

The EP8's power delivery was straightforward. Shimano's eTube app makes it easy to adjust motor output across various profiles, something we did upon replacing the motor. With the light weight of the Rise, we preferred a power curve that started less aggressively. The stock tune created a startling jolt when first applying pressure to the pedals.

Unfortunately, we found Shimano's eTube app cumbersome, and connecting with the bike via Bluetooth was difficult. The only way for the app to connect with the bike was to turn them both on simultaneously and wait 30 seconds to a minute for the connection to complete. There is no instant connection upon powering up the motor like some other manufacturers. The app also failed to give an exact battery level reading, using only bars that represent 20% increments. Fortunately, adjusting the motor's power output and setting profiles was straightforward.

The optimal cadence range of the EP801 RS is between 75-90 rpm. The detuned motor does have a noticeable cut-off point when that cadence range ends. Most of the testing time was spent in the Eco and Trail modes, only using Boost on occasion when riding with full-power bikes or on steep grades. The detuned EP8 rewards riders who are fit and don't mind pedaling. Under the right amount of rider input, the life of the 360Wh battery is impressive. On a particular ride accompanied by numerous full-power eMTBs, we achieved 6,000 feet of elevation — using mostly eco and trail modes— keeping the full-power bikes in sight on most climbs before expiring the battery as we returned to the vehicle. The 540Wh battery is an obvious upgrade for riders who want more juice, as using Boost mode eats up battery life much more quickly. The other option is the 252Wh range extender that can be attached to the frame for longer rides. The silver lining with lightweight e-bikes is that even if the battery dies during a ride, it can be pedaled without much penalty. 

M-TLD and MyO Build Kit Analysis

An important factor to consider with the Rise build kits is that Orbea's MyO customization program allows the buyer to change many components, giving preference to what type of riding the user intends to do. Analyzing the M-LTD build kit tested, we have two complaints, one minor and one more bothersome. 

We immediately swapped the uncomfortable Fizik Antares R1 saddle, but the real gripe was with the FOX Transfer SL seat post. The SL post (yes, even seat posts are available in superlight form these days) features only two seat post heights — fully extended and fully retracted. When not spinning up a consistent climb, most riders will probably find that the ideal saddle position rests somewhere between each option. When riding unfamiliar terrain, surprises on the trail result in the rider having to spend more time concentrating on getting the saddle entirely out. With a standard dropper, lowering the post a few centimeters is usually enough to allow for more rider movement to navigate tricky climbs. The Transfer SL is also prone to a large amount of play and noticeably flexes under the rider's weight. The good thing is Orbea offers the option for a standard Transfer post at no additional charge other than the heavier weight. 

Why Upgrade to Beefier Suspension? 

We began the test with a 140mm FOX Factory 34 FIT fork and a Float DPS shock. The 34's limited compression adjustments made finding a setup that kept the fork riding higher in its travel a little tricky. Even with running pressure higher than suggested, we would still find the fork using most of its travel quickly on medium-sized compressions. This may have been solved with an additional volume spacer, but rather than fiddle more, we installed the Factory 36 GRIP2 150mm fork to see if it would be more to our liking. 

When we swapped the Fox 34 fork for the 36, Orbea's internally routed headset setup presented some challenges. A few swear words were uttered as we struggled to stay organized with the numerous headset spacers, Spin Block, and various pieces involved in Orbea's intricate design. It was nearly a two-headed, three-handed project. After going through this process a few times, it likely becomes easier, but it definitely requires some patience. 

Once the 36 was mounted, there was no looking back. The 36 was an immediate step in the right direction, and we noticed how it did not deflect from obstacles like the 34. The GRIP2 damper felt instantly more supportive and responsive than the 34's FIT damper, with a full range of high- and low-speed compression and rebound adjustments. 

The Float DPS rear shock's limited adjustability made it challenging to tune the bottom-out we were experiencing on rougher trails and bigger hits. Much like we experienced with the fork change, the upgrade to the Float X was instantly appreciated. The low-speed compression adjustor offers plenty of noticeable tune range, and our bottom-out issues disappeared. 

For riders sticking to pure trail or more xc-style riding, the 34 and Float DPS will do the job, and the lighter weight will be appreciated. Riders who choose more aggressive trail riding and look to get rowdy on the way down will be better suited to the 36 and Float X, which are plenty qualified for the job and well worth the upgrade cost.

Tire Performance

Our M-LTD arrived with Maxxis Rekon tires, which Maxxis considers a light-duty trail tire. While our teeth are far from straight and pretty, we still prefer having them versus not. The Rekons contribute to a very light build, but a more capable and durable tire combo would be preferred straight out of the box, especially up front. Fortunately, again, Orbea's MyO program provides options for Dissector, Minion, and Assegai, even in DH casing. We swapped the tires before putting the bike through a proper test. Orbea sent us the Minion DHF/DHR combination (+20), which complemented the Rise in most conditions. 

2-Piston Brakes on an eMTB?

Our build featured Shimano's XTR 9100 2-piston brakes. While the stopping power of the 2-piston caliper impressed us, the brakes can be upgraded to the four-piston 9120 through the MyO program for only $55. For riders burning descents on the daily, don't even think twice about reaching for the four-piston model. 

Our build came with 180mm rotors front and rear. When we swapped forks, the front rotor was upgraded to 200mm, and offered noticeably more bite. 

Long Term Durability

Other than the Shimano EP8 motor issue at the beginning of our test, we found no signs of long-term worries with the Rise. The paint and clear coat are of high quality, holding up exceptionally well, and we have experienced no creaks, with pivots and bearings still working as well as day one. Orbea offers a lifetime warranty on the frame should a manufacturing defect occur.

What's The Bottom Line?

The Rise is a unique eMTB, not only because it can essentially be built to cater to different riding styles and terrain but because it can be the best of both worlds — a no-sacrifice, fun-consuming, playful trail bike that happens to be equipped with a motor. Most rewarding for riders who don't mind putting in the work to pedal (especially with the 360Wh battery), the Rise’s 60Nm motor and ability to offer 792Wh of battery capacity make it one of the leading models in the lightweight category. 

A refined evolution from the original model rather than a revised offering, the Rise’s enhanced integrations balanced with carry-over geometry may not warrant a reason to upgrade for existing Rise owners. But for potential e-bike buyers wanting a lightweight eMTB that gives up little to nothing in handling characteristics and pure fun, the Rise is one of the most advanced and honed e-bikes available today. 

For more information on the Rise, please visit orbea.com

Photos by Zach Heath

View key specs, compare e-bikes, and rate the Orbea Rise models in the Vital MTB Product Guide.

About The Reviewer

Rick Reed  - Age: 39 //  Years Riding MTB : Who’s counting? //  Height : 5' 9” (1.75m) //  Weight : 142 pounds (64.4kg)

A veteran of the bike industry, Rick now finds himself in his first phase of self-described “early retirement,” allowing him time to actually ride. Obsessive about bike setup, dissecting products and European croissants, Rick enjoys riding fast tech, backcountry singletrack, and bike parks, occasionally with the company of a select human being or two (you know who you are). He resides and takes siestas in Reno, NV with his terror dog, Zuul.

View replies to: TESTED - 2023 Orbea Rise Long Term Review

Most Popular

Trek Bicycle vs Orbea

Orbea vs trek bicycle: side-by-side brand comparison.

Compare Trek Bicycle vs. Orbea side-by-side. Choose the best bike brands for your needs based on 1,440 criteria such as newsletter coupons, Apple Pay Later financing, PayPal Pay Later, Shop Pay Installments and clearance page . Also, check out our full guide to the top 10 bike brands .

Know someone shopping for Trek Bicycle or Orbea? Share this comparison via Gmail or Facebook .

Trek Bicycle

Trek Bicycle vs. Orbea: Side-by-Side Comparison

Trek bicycle vs. orbea: compare store policies & checkout features.

Long Term Review: Orbea Oiz M20 full suspension XC race mountain bike

• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
• Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)

First revamped in 2012 as a 26” World Cup race rocket, the Orbea Oiz switched to 27.5” and 29er wheels for the 2015 model year but kept it’s XC race pedigree. At the launch event , we rode it through the mountains of France, putting it through plenty of uphill and flowing pedaling sections and some steep, aggressive descents. First impressions were very good, so we brought one in for long term review.

The upper/mid-range Oiz M20 29er arrived, offering a mix of SLX, XT and XTR components, DT Swiss wheels and Race Face cockpit parts for $4,999. The Oiz is offered in both 27.5″ (S/M/L) and 29er (M/L/XL) wheel sizes, and carbon fiber levels. The M20 uses their OMP level carbon frame, which is about 200g heavier than the top level OMR carbon found on the M10 and higher models…which start at $6,299 and go way up from there.

On paper, the bike would be perfect for our very XC-ish local trails in Greensboro, NC. The rear suspension is efficient, travel is short and the frame was now proven under Catharine Pendrel. And for a while it lived up to the hype…

DETAILS & ACTUAL WEIGHTS

The spec at this level leaves little to be desired, using respected name brand parts everywhere. Like virtually every bike, it ships with tubes, but I immediately set up the Maxxis Ikon 29×2.20 tires tubeless.

The frame is heavily shaped everywhere, which is typical for Orbea. It’s done mainly for stiffness here, but as you’ll see, it also adds functionality. All internally run cables enter at the front of the head tube (shift cables and rear shock remote). The rear brake hose runs outside the downtube.

Stack and reach on the Oiz follow linear, proportional growth across frame sizes, and head tubes are short on all of them so the rider can get in a low racy position if desired.

If you appreciate having a lockout, you’ll like knowing the front and rear CTD suspension is controlled by a single lever, but it creates a very cluttered cockpit. Honestly, the rear suspension is so efficient here (thanks to the high leverage and compression ratios used, which are detailed in our post from the bike’s launch), that I kept it in Trail mode almost exclusively, even when descending because the “D” mode on Fox’s 2015 32-series forks was simply too soft and blew through the travel. Unless you’re racing for the rainbow stripes, it’s my opinion this bike would be better served (and lighter) by ditching the lockouts and going with the RS-1 up front. Or the new 2016 Fox 32 . Considering the intended use, this bike screams for a better XC fork.

It’s worth mentioning that when we rode the Oiz at launch, several of us jimmied the cable’s position to set the fork in Trail while the shock went to Descend, which worked great.

The rear suspension linkage is minimal and sleek. Smaller frame sizes lack the split top tube, but it helps reinforce the seat tube on the XL we tested.

The frame is ready for any drivetrain and shock system, mechanical or electronic (Di2, iCTD). In fact, our first ride on the new XTR Di2 was on one of these.

The most unique feature of the Oiz is the small steel strut (looks like a spoke) used to tie the seatstay pivots together. It’s not there to keep each side from acting independently, rather to keep the linkage from spreading apart under compression and wearing prematurely. That’s the stated intent anyway, in reality it seemed to have a massive impact on rear end stability. Keep reading…

The bottom bracket shell is extra wide, sized for PF92. It, along with the angular downtube shaping made for a solid pedaling platform with negligible if any pedal bob while seated and minimal bob while standing. Putting the suspension in “Climb” mode made it feel like a hardtail.

On the other side of the BB, the rear derailleur cable housing exits the downtube and runs through a liner between the BB shell and swingarm and through a guide to redirect it along the bottom of the chainstay. Another cable port just above the one visible here is for Side Swing front derailleurs, but this bike used a traditional FD.

The seatstays are slim, designed to bow upward to make up for the lack of a rear pivot near the axle. Orbea stuck with a 135mm QR to save weight and make for quicker wheel changes. More opinion on this coming up soon, too…

The inside face of the dropouts is metal to prevent wear and tear between hub shell and carbon.

Plenty of clearance top and bottom for the Maxxis Ikon 29×2.2 tires.

The complete bike, size XL and without pedals, came in at 25.49lb (11.56kg). Spec includes alloy Race Face bar, stem and seatpost, DT Swiss X 1700 wheels, Maxxis Ikon TLR 120tpi tires, Selle Italia SL XC Flow saddle, SLX shifters/brakes/front der., XTR rear der., and Fox Factory suspension. Retail is $4,999.

RIDE REVIEW

Lemme start this off with a list of pros and cons, as it’s mostly positive bullet points:

• The Oiz very fast and efficient both sitting and standing, with great power transfer even while leaving the suspension fully active. Catharine Pendrel is pedaling this to World Cup XC wins, albeit with a bit different spec , and there’s no doubt why.
• It rockets uphill and along the flats, whether they’re smooth or rooted.
• Along those lines, you can keep hammering through roots, rocks and other trail chatter with no fear of pedal strike. This particular feature stood out as I could pedal through rough sections that I’ve clipped pedals on with other bikes. The BB height is 325mm (12.79″), with a BB drop of 45mm. That’s more drop than both the Specialized Epic (40mm) and Niner JET9 (35mm), two 100mm travel bikes, the latter of which I ride as my daily bike, yet the Oiz felt like I could pedal through stuff more cleanly. This could be due to the lower sag recommendations on the Oiz combined with the firmer rear suspension. Whatever it was, it worked…
• …and without giving up a capable suspension. The Oiz handles aggressive terrain far better than its XC branding would suggest. I wouldn’t throw a bigger fork on it, but it handled some Pisgah Forest exposure just fine.
• Decent front triangle stiffness meant the bike felt solid when rocking it back and forth in sprints or driving into a corner.

• It could do without the lockouts, doesn’t really need it in the rear unless you want to feel like you’re racing a hardtail.
• This bike was made for a fork like the RS-1 and would be made much better by spec’ing the newer Fox forks or similar. It’s not the bike’s fault, but the entire 2015 range was spec’d with CTD forks.
• While the front end was plenty stiff, the rear end could be stiffer. This is my only real performance complaint, so I’ll elaborate:

If there’s one thing we can give Orbea credit for, it’s going for it. They had an idea to do it differently and they went for it. And for some riders, it probably works just fine. The Oiz suspension’s design was done to save weight wherever possible. There’s no pivot at the rear axle, instead relying on the seatstays to flex. And they stuck with the quick release to save grams compared to a thru axle.

Another key design choice they made was to make the upper linkage out of carbon rather than aluminum. That saved ~45g, but it required a spoke-like strut to keep the pivot arms from splaying outward. It was this explanation of the strut’s purpose that made my experience with the bike all the more flummoxing.

After a month of riding, the rear end started getting sloppy, like a sailor that hadn’t found his sea legs. The rear end would lag behind in corners, and the overall stability of the bike just fell apart. I could grab the top of the rear tire and wobble it back and forth almost 2cm. Problem was, everything seemed to be tight. The upper and lower suspension pivots were tight. The skewer was tight. The hub and bearings were tight. Yet there was a tremendous amount of play at the rear wheel, making the bike unrideable.

Turns out, the strut worked itself loose, but not so loose as to be apparent. But once it was loose, the quality of the ride went to pot.

Fixing it literally amounted to a turning the strut’s outside bolt (I also gave the inner bolts a few small turns to be safe) and the rear end was back to normal, and it stayed that way for the duration of our test. Considering it’s not marketed as a structural stiffening component on the bike, the strut’s impact on performance was very surprising.

Once fixed, the rear end is stiff enough. It’s not the stiffest, but it worked for my admittedly-large-for-an-XC-racer frame of 6’2″ and 190lbs (188cm / 86kg). For comparison, Pendrel and her teammates look to be maybe 100lbs soaking wet and they’re killin’ it on this bike. My feeling is that a rear thru axle and using a larger diameter hollow axle in place of the strut, even if only 10mm round, would provide massive gains in stiffness with minimal weight penalty. And that would make an otherwise very good bike an excellent race bike for XC and marathon for any size rider.

Tyler Benedict is the Founder of Bikerumor.com . He has been writing about the latest bikes, components, and cycling technology for almost two decades. Prior to that, Tyler launched and built multiple sports nutrition brands and consumer goods companies, mostly as an excuse to travel to killer riding locations throughout North America.

Based in North Carolina, Tyler loves family adventure travel and is always on the lookout for the next shiny new part to make his bikes faster and lighter.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

Even before anyone starts about that puny strut, QR on a $$$$ full-sus bike in 2015? I’m calling fail.

Who rides bikes without pedals? Can anyone actually do it?

Why not just weigh the bike without tires, grips, saddle, etc – someone may choose to put their own preferences of these items instead…

Too bad the full weight would make the bike seem heavy and overpriced per weight..!

bikeduder – we weigh them without pedals because it’s consistent for any bike we weigh, apples to apples, and because that’s how you’ll pick up the bike at the shop unless you want cheap plastic flats used for demo rides in the parking lot. There are so many different brands and types of pedals that it’s not practical to include them in complete bike weights since the pedals you use are likely different. Best bet is to weigh your pedals, then add that to any published weight you see for a bike.

archie – FWIW, it depends on the design if it really matters. On a true URT bike like the Niner JET9, the gains in stiffness were infinitesimal and the thru axle added weight (their words, not mine), but consumers demanded it so they did it. I have two JET9 RDO’s in my stable, one with QR and one with TA and they ride identical to one another. On this bike, though, which uses independent sides that are only joined at the chainstay yoke, I do believe a thru axle would make a noticeable difference for heavier riders.

Tyler – To test your thru-axle theory try installing a bolt-on skewer like the Halo Hex Key and see if it makes any difference to rear-end stiffness.

Thru axle = repeatable rotor placement. No other reason is even needed. QR is out.

greg – Doesn’t seem to be a problem for Catharine Pendrel.

I don’t have problems at all with rotor position after putting the wheels back on the bike, with QR…XT brakes, maybe that matters. In fact, I’ve been using for some days a hardtail 29er with thru axles in both ends, and those’ve been a pain in the ass every time I had to put the wheels back after a car ride or whatever.Specially the front, with an evil Manitou QR, that takes quite a while to get used to. Every time I swap wheels in my QR equipped MTB, or road bike, feels like heaven. Ah, TBH, I didn’t find any advantage with the thru axle, even in stiffness.

Pasabaporaquí – Probably the main reason those thru-axle wheels are a pita to put back on have to to with tight fitting disk pads and aligning them in. Axle system doesn’t change how a wheel goes in.

Having grown up used to QR for many years, I could take of and mount QR wheels blindfolded, so changing to thru-axle might get a while getting used to, but that doesn’t mean it’s better or worse.

Thru axles have other benefits, other than stiffness: – The interface with the fork/frame is designed by the same fork/frame designers, so it can be as good or bad as they want to! Hub designers just have to focus on their side of the problem. – Wheel alignment is always perfect, even if not tightened properly. Noobs are saved! Best of all your wheel isn’t going to fall off. – Larger diameter axles allow designers to play with newer materials and overall have better weight and strength. 9mm QR was designed when the best material available was wood.

Tyler Benedict – What brand and model is that blue helmet, it looks nice.

in XC theres a lot of steep uphill so weight actually matters quite a bit more than road cycling (or dh/enduro/blah .. specially dh where weight basically doesnt matter) 500gr+ start to make a diff you really feel.

XTC – it’s an Orbea helmet (Model: MTB1-Y-1), and it’s very comfortable and reasonably light. Much more normal looking and better fitting than some of their other models from years past.

Tyler, should you ever grow weary of choosing which JET9 to ride, I will gladly take one. I ride a Large.

Tyler Benedict – Thanks for the information.

I love the bike, but need an XL with 27.5 wheels. I know several with ride XL sized bikes who prefer 27.5 wheels.

Thanks for the review. Do you think a smaller size, 27.5 version would still have the same cons? Also how did the bike perform on decents?

I have this bike, and I can attest to everything written. Being 6’2 240 and riding everything from XC races to 24 hour Endurance Races. The bike has been nearly flawless. I too had the same issue with the strut loosening after about 200 miles, and I also wish the bike would have come with a 12mm thru axle like the 2016 Ocaam will… But all in all, this bike has been pretty awesome. 25.5 lbs for an XL 29er, full suspension with pedals…

Do you know if the large 29er frame the same exact frame as the large 27.5 frame or do they differ in geometry?

I have an OIZ M30, I have put over 1000 miles of single track trails in just about 11 months and I can say that it is the best mountain bike I have ever owned. (I had a 2013 Epic Carbon, and a niner RIP RDO 2013 ) This bike is a racing bike it isn’t the most comfortable for extra long rides but it is the most nimble and accurate bike of the three. As I have it set up today it is just under 25lbs (L) frame, XTR everything other than brakes, those are still SLX, the result are dynamics perfect for cross country riding. The tires have been excellent, the fork, shock and accesories have worked better than I expected. The only changes I have done have been out of pure stubbornness or as a result of a crash, with only regular maintenance I already can tell that this bike has the potential to outlast my old aluminum bikes.

I honestly believe that this bike can be one of the best of bikes ever produced, it has a great design, excellent workmanship and so far great customer support.

So I’ve read this review and despite the spoke problem, I got it anyway. Sounds more like an ajustment than a real problem. Anyone cam tell me how the spoke adjustment must be done? The manual says 0,5nm on it. Seems so few. When you guys retight the spoke, how much torque do you leave there?

I have 1700 miles on my 2015 M20 OIZ, I have had specialized mountain bikes and without a doubt this bike is the best XC Carbon bike of them all. I have always been a fan of FOX and they don’t disappoint with the fork and shock. The stock tires are great (MAXXIS Ikon) the Shimano components are reliable and work perfectly as long as they are maintained. My large frame with XTR pedals is under 24 pounds I have upgraded most components to carbon and run single 36T chain ring up front. Overall the geometry and suspension design make this bike an excellent climber and great on the descends. I had an issue with the tension bolt but the dealer took care of it right away.

ordered the updated oiz m20 2017. Boost and thru axle. will give a review in 6 months time.

waiting for review with interest, as might do the same on an m20/m30

Follow Us On

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.

Is Orbea OCCAM H30 A Good Choice? – [Orbea OCCAM H30 Review]

Table of Contents

Orbea OCCAM H30 Review

• Price: $3299
• Frame: Aluminum
• Tires: Maxxis Rekon 2.40″

What we like about it: The ability to support customization within a certain range, catering to the needs of a wider range of riders.

What we didn’t like about it: Lack of a water bottle cage, which may be inconvenient for riders who enjoy riding in remote areas.

Rating: (4.8/5)

Whenever I ride on forest trails, I can feel the tranquility of the woods. This feeling, mixed with excitement, keeps me wanting more. To share this joy with more people, we discovered the Orbea OCCAM H30. I am very excited to see how it performs on forest trails.

In the following sections, we will analyze the riding experience, key features, components, specifications, and other versions of the Orbea OCCAM H30. Additionally, we will compare it to several other top bike models in the latter part of this article. If you want to learn more about bike reviews, feel free to follow us.

Riding Experience

As a highly capable full-suspension forest trail bike, I had high expectations for the Orbea OCCAM H30. To put it to the test, I booked a flight and reserved a hotel on IHG, heading to Bike Park Ireland.

At Bike Park Ireland, I chose the Black Trail 26. This trail spans 582 meters and primarily descends, with a slight uphill section in the middle. The elevation drop is 72 meters. The trail is narrow, allowing for only one bike at a time. It is filled with gravel, fallen branches, and sharp turns. What surprises will these elements bring to my ride?

Forest Trail Riding

I started my descent on the Black Trail 26, constantly adjusting the Shimano Deore M6100 SGS Shadow Plus rear derailleur to adapt to different gradients. The 140mm front travel provided excellent suspension, and I didn’t experience excessive bumpiness during downhill sections.

Furthermore, when encountering steep downhill sections, I controlled my speed with the Shimano MT201 Hydraulic Disc brakes before soaring through the air. In mid-air, I adjusted my posture, found a suitable landing spot, and continued riding. This provided a thrilling experience.

During uphill sections, I shifted the Shimano Deore M6100 SGS Shadow Plus rear derailleur to the smallest gear ratio and stood up to accelerate. I also utilized the dropper function of the OC Mountain Control MC20 seatpost to lower its height, preventing any collision between my legs and the saddle.

I reached a section with continuous turns, which might intimidate some riders. However, with my extensive experience and adventurous spirit, I embraced the challenge.

I skillfully maneuvered the OC Mountain Control MC30 handlebar, executing agile turns. I continuously adjusted my speed using the Shimano MT201 Hydraulic Disc brakes to avoid any hazards.

The Maxxis Rekon tires provided excellent traction, allowing me to find the optimal point of power delivery and handle each turn with precision. It instilled a sense of confidence in me.

Is that all?

The Orbea OCCAM H30 is equipped with the Selle Royal 2058 DRN saddle, crafted from exceptional materials. It features a comfort-oriented geometric shape that provides excellent support in any position. I find it very comfortable to sit on, and even during bumpy rides, I don’t feel my buttocks becoming stiff.

Furthermore, the Orbea OCCAM H30 is equipped with the outstanding Maxxis Rekon, a lightweight off-road tire with a 60TPI casing. The special blend of compounds reduces rolling resistance, optimizes tread wear, and provides enhanced traction and grip. The EXO puncture protection effectively prevents tire punctures, ensuring my safety.

Specifications

The Orbea OCCAM H30 is a highly capable full-suspension forest trail bike. It features the Orbea Occam Hydro High Polished Triple Butted aluminum frame, which is extremely sturdy. The 29″ aluminum wheels offer excellent maneuverability, and the 140mm front travel provides exceptional suspension performance.

Additionally, the Orbea OCCAM H30 is equipped with a 1×12 Shimano Deore M6100 SGS Shadow Plus rear derailleur, ensuring smooth gear shifting. The Maxxis Rekon 2.40″ tires provide exceptional traction and grip. The EXO puncture protection further enhances rider safety.

It is worth mentioning that the Orbea OCCAM H30 supports customization within a certain range, catering to the needs of more riders.

Other V ersions

After numerous tests, our understanding of this bike has deepened. It is an outstanding hardtail mountain bike.

However, many riders have their own performance or component requirements. Therefore, we explored other bikes of the same type for further investigation.

Orbea OCCAM H20 LT

The Orbea OCCAM H20 LT is impressive. Compared to the Deore groupset on the Orbea OCCAM H30, it features the superior Shimano SLX Race Face groupset, providing powerful performance and smoother gear shifting. Additionally, the Orbea OCCAM H20 LT has 150mm front travel, offering better suspension performance.

Geometrically, these two bikes are identical. However, the Orbea OCCAM H20 LT is $700 more expensive than the Orbea OCCAM H30. Therefore, if budget is a concern, I recommend the Orbea OCCAM H30. If you desire better components and enhanced suspension performance, the Orbea OCCAM H20 LT will be an excellent choice.

What do we like about it?

• The ability to support customization within a certain range, catering to the needs of a wider range of riders.
• Three color options, each with its unique characteristics.
• The Maxxis Rekon 2.40″ tire with EXO puncture protection provides a greater sense of security.
• Excellent climbing and descending capabilities.

What don’t we like about it?

• No water bottle cage, which prevents riders from hydrating promptly.
• Is this bike suitable for beginners?

This bike is suitable for both beginners and experienced riders.

• Can the components be changed on this bike?

It allows for component customization within a specified range.

• What’s the braking system on this bike?

The braking system on this bike is the Shimano MT201 Hydraulic Disc.

• How do I choose the right size?

The size chart is below:

These sizes are just general guidelines, and the most accurate way to find your size is to try it out.

C omparison T able

Orbea occam h30 vs canyon neuron cf 9.

The Canyon Neuron CF 9 features a carbon frame and carbon wheels, making it lighter in weight compared to the aluminum frame and wheels of the Orbea OCCAM H30. Additionally, the Canyon Neuron CF 9 is available in two wheel sizes, 27.5″ and 29″. The 29″ wheels provide better terrain clearance, while the 27.5″ wheels offer more agility and better maneuverability, giving riders more options.

Furthermore, the Canyon Neuron CF 9 is $700 more expensive than the Orbea OCCAM H30. However, the Orbea OCCAM H30 offers three color options. If you prioritize more color choices, the Orbea OCCAM H30 would be a great fit. If you have a sufficient budget and desire more size options for the wheel, the Canyon Neuron CF 9 would be the perfect choice for you.

Orbea OCCAM H30 vs Trek Top Fuel 7

The Orbea OCCAM H30 features 140mm front travel, providing a highly effective suspension compared to the Trek Top Fuel 7 with 120mm front travel. However, the Trek Top Fuel 7 is equipped with Shimano XT and SLX components, offering superior performance and a more precise and smooth Shimano Deore XT M8100 12-speed gear shifting.

With a stack/reach ratio of 1.32, the Orbea OCCAM H30 provides greater flexibility and a more comfortable riding experience compared to the Trek Top Fuel 7 with a stack/reach ratio of 1.29. If you prioritize a more comfortable ride, the Orbea OCCAM H30 would be better suited for you. If you desire components with superior performance, I would recommend the Trek Top Fuel 7.

Learn More: Is Trek Top Fuel 8 A Good Bike? [Trek Top Fuel 8 Review]

Orbea OCCAM H30 vs YT Industries Izzo CORE 3 29

The YT Industries Izzo CORE 3 29 features a carbon frame, which is very lightweight and can enhance riding speed. However, it is more prone to breakage when facing lateral impacts. On the other hand, the Orbea OCCAM H30 has an aluminum frame that is sturdier and offers greater strength, making it less prone to breakage.

The YT Industries Izzo CORE 3 29 is equipped with SRAM GX Eagle, which provides better performance compared to the Shimano Deore equipped on the Orbea OCCAM H30. However, the YT Industries Izzo CORE 3 29 has 130mm front travel, resulting in weaker suspension compared to the Orbea OCCAM H30 with 140mm travel.

In summary, if you prefer a lighter bike frame, the YT Industries Izzo CORE 3 29 would be more suitable for you. If you prioritize a sturdier bike frame and better suspension performance, the Orbea OCCAM H30 would be a better choice to meet your needs.

Orbea OCCAM H30 vs Ibis Ripmo AF GX

The Ibis Ripmo AF GX features an excellent 160mm front travel and 147mm rear travel, providing superior suspension compared to the Orbea OCCAM H30 with 140mm travel.

Additionally, the Orbea OCCAM H30 is equipped with the Marzocchi Bomber Z2 fork, while the Ibis Ripmo AF GX comes with the Marzocchi Bomber Z1 fork. The Bomber Z2 fork utilizes Marzocchi’s Rail damper, which has a low-speed compression lever at the top for quick and silent infinite adjustments. On the other hand, the Bomber Z1 fork uses the Grip damper, which offers a straightforward setup process.

Therefore, if you prefer a fork with an easy setup process, I would recommend the Ibis Ripmo AF GX. If you value silent adjustments, the Orbea OCCAM H30 would be the better choice for you.

Learn More: Is Ibis Ripmo AF GX Worth Buying? – [Ibis Ripmo AF GX Review ]

This is our review of the Orbea OCCAM H30. This is our comprehensive evaluation of the Orbea OCCAM H30. This exceptional full-suspension trail bike delivers impressive performance during rides. Based on our evaluation, we give it a high rating of 4.8. If you would like to obtain more information about bicycles, feel free to check out our other reviews.

Lastly, if you enjoy our content, please share it with your friends. If our content has been helpful to you, you can click the email subscription button below. We appreciate your support!

Related Posts

[Orbea URRUN 10 20mph Review] – Best Used By People Who Enjoy Riding To Get AFeel For The Mountains!

[schwinn admiral hybrid bicycle review] -is schwinn admiral hybrid bicycle worth buying？.

[Specialized Turbo Como 5.0 Review] – Good Choice?

15 of The Best Mountain Bike Saddles You Can Buy

20 INCH FOLDING BIKE BTWIN 120 Review－Fold up and put in “pocket”

2023 Top 10 Best Fun Kids Bike Bells – Will This Bring Joy To Your Child’s Ride?

27.5 vs 29er Mountain Bikes – The Battle Of The Century

Best 20 inch Bikes For 6-13 Years Old Kids Bikes (With Gears)

Best 27.2 Dropper Post

Best 30.9 Dropper Post In

Best 31.6 Dropper Post

Best Mountain Bike Stems-Better Travel Through The Mountains And Forests

Leave a comment cancel reply.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

• Forum Listing
• Marketplace
• Advanced Search
• Community Help Section
• Archived Discussions

Trek X-Caliber 9 2017 vs. Orbea Alma H30 29er 2017

• Add to quote

Both are OK but have fallen behind in the current move towards more trail capable geo and Plus tire capacity. Boost 148 rear and 110 front hubs are the new standard. Plus tires will be safer and easier for riding more difficult terrain. Wider rims give tires more sidewall support which means no tire foldover in turns and less abrupt washouts and falls. The top 5 mountain bike trends for 2017 - BikeRadar And there are better bikes for the money. Bikeradar does articles. I'd be looking for a 27.5+/29 compatible hardtail at about your budget point. A used 2016 Stache may be in that range. That frame will take 29+, 27.5+ and 29 tire sizes.  

eb1888 said: Both are OK but have fallen behind in the current move towards more trail capable geo and Plus tire capacity. Boost 148 rear and 110 front hubs are the new standard. Plus tires will be safer and easier for riding more difficult terrain. Wider rims give tires more sidewall support which means no tire foldover in turns and less abrupt washouts and falls. The top 5 mountain bike trends for 2017 - BikeRadar And there are better bikes for the money. Bikeradar does articles. I'd be looking for a 27.5+/29 compatible hardtail at about your budget point. A used 2016 Stache may be in that range. That frame will take 29+, 27.5+ and 29 tire sizes. Click to expand...

Let's liven This Thread up I'm in the market and looking at the alma. Does anybody have some first-hand experience with this bike?  

• ?            
• 15.5M posts
• 517.1K members

Top Contributors this Month

• Forum Listing
• Marketplace
• Advanced Search
• Manufacturer Forums

Orbea vs. Trek

• Add to quote

I have been happily riding a 2006 Orbea Onix for the past few years. It is equipped with Ultegra and mid level Shimano wheels. A couple months ago, my friend sold me his 2004 Trek 5900 Superlight at a bargain price. The bike has Dura Ace and some inexpensive wheels. He kept the wheels that were on it for his new bike. My intentions were to use the Trek as a second bike....mostly on the trainer and in poor weather. I am sorry to report that the Trek blows away my beloved Onix. It is much, much more responsive and quicker. Handles better. Stiffer and stronger in the bottom bracket. The Onix only betters the Trek in comfort and not by much.  

You’re comparing apples and oranges. The Trek is a high $$$ top level racing machine and the Onix is a great low/mid $ level recreational/century machine, one of the best out there for what it does but not in the same league as a 5900 SL.  

Eric, You make a good point. I did not expect the difference to be quite so dramatic since the Trek frame is older and retailed for approximately the same amount as the Onix frame. The wheels on the Trek bike are significantly lower in quality than the wheels on the Orbea. This reduces the advantage of the Trek. However, I do plan on keeping and enjoying both bikes. It would be very interesting to compare the Trek to the Orca and Opal and hear from other riders. Thanks for your input.  

Rockne said: Eric, You make a good point. I did not expect the difference to be quite so dramatic since the Trek frame is older and retailed for approximately the same amount as the Onix frame. The wheels on the Trek bike are significantly lower in quality than the wheels on the Orbea. This reduces the advantage of the Trek. However, I do plan on keeping and enjoying both bikes. It would be very interesting to compare the Trek to the Orca and Opal and hear from other riders. Thanks for your input. Click to expand...

Rockne said: I have been happily riding a 2006 Orbea Onix for the past few years. It is equipped with Ultegra and mid level Shimano wheels. A couple months ago, my friend sold me his 2004 Trek 5900 Superlight at a bargain price. The bike has Dura Ace and some inexpensive wheels. He kept the wheels that were on it for his new bike. My intentions were to use the Trek as a second bike....mostly on the trainer and in poor weather. I am sorry to report that the Trek blows away my beloved Onix. It is much, much more responsive and quicker. Handles better. Stiffer and stronger in the bottom bracket. The Onix only betters the Trek in comfort and not by much. Click to expand...

Rockne said: If you have ridden Trek and Orbea, please share your observation. I am torn between a used Orbea Onix and Trek 5900 SL. Click to expand...

• ?            
• 205.4K members

Top Contributors this Month

ON TEST | The 2021 Orbea Oiz M Team Is A Sub-10kg Speedster

With a long and storied history that dates all the way back to 2006, the Orbea Oiz is the Basque brand’s lightest, sharpest, and most efficient full suspension mountain bike. Designed as a no-holds-barred, World-Cup-winning, hammer-dropping race machine, the Oiz features 100mm of travel front and rear, the option to run dual water bottles, and a slick remote-adjustable suspension system.

Orbea has made some key updates to the Oiz for 2021, so to see exactly what’s changed, how it rides on the trail, and how it compares directly to the likes of the latest Specialized Epic, Cannondale Scalpel and Canyon Lux, we’ve just gotten in a brand new Oiz M Team. Here we’ll be taking a closer look at the Basque Beauty in preparation for the full review, coming soon.

The 2021 Orbea Oiz – What’s New?

The most recent version of the Oiz was rolled out two years ago, and for the most part, the 2021 version looks pretty much identical. Indeed the frame shape, suspension design, and most of the geometry remains the same. The big change with the new Oiz is the introduction of a lighter OMX frame option for the top-end models.

OMX is Orbea’s premium high-modulus carbon fibre that, up until now, was only used in its flagship road racing bikes. During construction, carbon fibre sheets are laser cut and arranged in a layup that is specific to each frame size, in order to minimise excess material and keep weight to the minimum. Full EPS moulds along with polyurethane and latex inserts are used in order to smooth out compaction internally, eliminating wrinkles and excess resin buildup.

Compared to the existing Oiz OMR frame, the new Oiz OMX with its fancy carbon fibre is claimed to drop 250 grams, which equates to a very healthy 12% drop in frame weight.

Is It The Lightest?

Orbea’s claimed frame weight for the new Oiz OMX is 1,740g for a medium frame including the rear shock. We’re still waiting to confirm with Orbea if that figure is for a painted frame, and whether that includes the seat clamp, cable bits, rear axle and derailleur hanger, which seems to be the most common way that weights are published.

Either way, if we’re talking about claimed frame weights only, the Oiz OMX is bloody light, but it isn’t quite the lightest on the market. That mantle goes to the new Specialized S-Works Epic EVO , which funnily enough, is actually lighter than the regular Epic since it doesn’t use the Brain damper.

• Specialized S-Works Epic EVO – 1,659g
• Orbea Oiz OMX – 1,740g
• Scott Spark RC HMX SL – 1,799g
• Specialized S-Works Epic – 1,869g
• Cannondale Scalpel Hi-Mod – 1,910g
• Trek Supercaliber – 1,933g
• Giant Anthem Advanced Pro 29 – 1,983g
• Canyon Lux CF SLX – 1,986g
• Pivot Mach 4 SL – 2,124g
• Santa Cruz Blur CC – 2,250g

There’s A New Back-End Too

Along with the new OMX carbon fibre mainframe, the top-end Oiz models also get a new rear end. The main difference is that it’s shorter (430mm vs 435mm), which should help to improve cornering agility, perhaps at the expense of some high-speed stability.

The one-piece carbon swingarm uses Orbea’s UFO design, which relies on flex through the seatstays to provide the necessary articulation required for the shock to cycle through its travel. According to Orbea, the pivot-less rear end saves around 100g compared to using a conventional pivot at the rear dropout. Driving the shock is a long-fibre injected composite Fibrelink, which is lighter than the alloy link that comes on the cheaper Oiz models.

According to Orbea, the pivot-less rear end saves around 100g compared to using a conventional pivot at the rear dropout. Further grams are saved via the long-fibre injected composite Fibrelink.

Also new is the move to a flat-mount disc brake, which has helped to reduce material around the dropout. It also brings the flex point down closer to the axle, which Orbea claims improves the suspension kinematics. At the very least, the direct mount calliper looks super clean with the 160mm rear rotor.

And lastly, the Oiz OMX frame now uses the SRAM UDH (Universal Derailleur Hanger). While it’s still not exactly universal, with Trek, Specialized and Santa Cruz on board, it’s apparent that this will likely become the dominant derailleur hanger standard in the future.

While it’s still not exactly universal, with Trek, Specialized and Santa Cruz on board, it’s apparent that this will likely become the dominant standard in the future.

So Fresh & So Clean-Clean

Both the fork and shock are linked up to a handlebar-mounted remote lockout lever that Orbea calls Squidlock. The paddle shape is reminiscent of Scott’s TwinLoc system, and it uses its own clamp to mount next to the left-hand grip. The Squidlock engages both the fork and shock simultaneously, offering the pilot the ability to flick between Open, Medium and Firm settings.

The rear shock itself is also specific to Orbea, with a custom cable-actuation that sees the lockout cable entirely hidden from view inside the top tube. Orbea calls this i-Line (Inside Line), since it offers the most direct path between the lever and the shock to minimise cable friction. Combined with the push-to-unlock orientation, the paddle has a nice and light action, especially compared to the Canyon Lux we reviewed recently .

The i-Line rear shock is also specific to Orbea, with a custom cable-actuation that sees the lockout cable entirely hidden from view inside the top tube.

Of course there’s also internal routing for the derailleur cable and brake line, giving the Oiz some lovely clean lines. And in the hope of keeping things looking clean for longer, there’s a new low-profile chainstay protector, and a minimalist upper chainguide that integrates discreetly onto the main pivot.

Accentuating the frame shape is the new OC stem, which is complemented with matching headset spacers that give the cockpit a semi-integrated look. The bar and stem still utilise standard fitments though, so there’s nothing funky to worry about if you do want to change one out. Likewise, you’ve got a conventional PF92 bottom bracket shell, and 148x12mm dropouts.

Ready, Steady, Race!

With the exception of the 5mm shorter chainstay length, the rest of the Orbea Oiz’ geometry remains the same as the 2020 version. Compared to some of the more boundary-pushing XC bikes out there, the Oiz stays true to the XC dream with sharp angles and an aggressive, low front end.

• Head Angle: 69°
• Seat Angle: 75°
• Reach: 407mm (S), 435mm (M), 456mm (L), 476mm (XL)
• Stack: 586mm (S), 591mm (M), 600mm (L), 614mm (XL)
• Chainstay Length: 430mm
• BB Height: 327mm
• BB Drop: 47mm

There’s A Trail Version Too

Orbea splits the Oiz into two distinct versions: the regular Oiz (100/100mm travel) and the Oiz TR (120/120mm travel). Both utilise the same frame, though the Oiz TR adds in a slightly longer stroke shock and a longer fork to lift travel by 20mm at each end. Additionally, the TR models come with more aggressive tyres and a dropper post, making them a more versatile option.

This trick of up-forking and up-shocking a frame has become a popular one, which we’ve seen elsewhere in the likes of the Scott Spark, Norco Revolver FS and the Cannondale Scalpel. As well as creating two bikes from one, it also gives you the potential to upgrade your frame down the track. If you bought the XC version for example, you could always change the fork and shock and turn it into more of a trail bike. And vice versa.

What’s Available In The 2021 Orbea Oiz Lineup?

There are ten Oiz models available for 2021, which are spread across three different frames;

• OMX: Full carbon fibre, Fibrelink
• OMR: Full carbon fibre, AlloyLink
• Hydro: Full alloy, AlloyLink

The four top-end models utilise the new OMX carbon frame, the three mid-level bikes use the OMR frame, and the three entry-level bikes use the Hydro frame. Prices start at $4,299 AUD for the Oiz H30 and go up to $12,999 AUD for the Oiz M LTD.

What’s really cool is that there are options to customise each bike with dropper posts, wheel upgrades, and tyre swaps, all of which you can select at the point of purchase. If you’re looking at the OMX models, that also opens up the option of Orbea’s MyO program, which offers you a staggering array of paint jobs and further options to change components including the drivetrain, brakes and suspension.

2021 Orbea Oiz M Team On Review

To put the new Oiz to the test, Orbea Australia sent us out the new Oiz M Team, which sits just one rung down from the very top of the range. Of course it uses the new OMX carbon frame, and it comes decked out with a Fox Factory Series suspension package, new DT Swiss XRC 1501 wheels, and a full Shimano XTR groupset.

Having recently reviewed the new Specialized Epic, Cannondale Scalpel and Canyon Lux, we’re eager to see how the Orbea Oiz compares on the trail. We’ll be testing the Oiz over the coming weeks, so stay tuned for the full review. And if you’ve got any questions in the meantime, as always, hit us up in the comments.

• Frame | OMX Carbon Fibre, UFO Single-Pivot Suspension Design, 100mm Travel
• Fork | Fox 32 Float Step-Cast, Factory Series, Remote-Adjust, 44mm Offset, 100mm Travel
• Shock | Fox Float DPS, Factory Series, Remote-Adjust, 190x40mm
• Wheels | DT Swiss XRC 1501 Spline 30, Carbon Rims, 30mm Inner Width
• Tyres | Maxxis Rekon Race EXO 29×2.35in
• Drivetrain | Shimano XTR 1×12 w/XTR 34T Crankset & 10-51T Cassette
• Brakes | Shimano XTR M9100 2-Piston w/180mm CenterLock Front & 160mm Rear Rotors
• Bar | OC3 Carbon Flat, 31.8mm Diameter, 760mm Wide
• Stem | OC3 Alloy, -8° Rise, Length: 60mm (S), 75mm (M-L), 90mm (XL)
• Grips | Orbea Foam
• Seatpost | OC2 Carbon, 31.6mm Diameter
• Saddle | Selle Italia SLR Boost Fill, Titanium Rails
• Available Sizes | Small, Medium, Large, Extra-Large
• Confirmed Weight | 9.86kg (Medium, setup tubeless & w/out pedals)
• RRP | $10,999 AUD

Mo’ Flow Please!

Enjoyed that article? Then there’s plenty more to check out on Flow Mountain Bike, including all our  latest news stories  and  product reviews . And if you haven’t already, make sure you subscribe to our  YouTube  channel, and sign up to our  Facebook  page and  Instagram  feed so you can keep up to date with all things Flow!

• Submit for Review
• Terms & Conditions

Enjoy reading this?

Get similar articles delivered directly to your inbox