community based tourism in south africa

Operational Guidelines for Community-Based Tourism in South Africa

• Published: 2016

How useful was this resource?

Click on a star to rate it!

As you found this resource useful...

Share us on social media!

Description

This South Africa Department of Tourism set of guidelines explains community-based tourism and provides basic guidance to help businesses establish and operate commercially viable community-based tourism ventures in South Africa while showcasing best practices.

“ A. Spenceley ;   2016;   Operational Guidelines for Community-Based Tourism in South Africa;   BTRP-ID:  2606″

Like this Resource?

• [email protected]

Report an entry

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Community-Based Tourism: A Panacea for Community Development in Nqileni Village, Eastern Cape, South Africa

This article investigates the viability of community-based tourism (CBT) in support of socio-economic development and poverty alleviation through a case study in Nqileni Village, Eastern Cape Province in South Africa. This was done through data solicited using a qualitative research approach amongst residents of Nqileni village in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. The data collected was then analysed using NVivo system, version 11, which provided substance to the research through the creation of a comprehensive observation report. The results indicated a positive view of members of the community relating to the contribution of CBT to community development (socio-economics) and poverty alleviation.

Related Papers

Sustainability

Owen Gohori

This article examines the perceptions of local people concerning the potential of tourism to alleviate poverty and bring about community development in the Manicaland Province, Zimbabwe. In-depth interviews, direct observations, and informal conversations were used to collect data in the four districts of Manicaland where there were functional community-based tourism (CBT) projects. After establishing a poverty criterion, data were collected from 43 local poor people in the four districts of the case study area. The results show that tourism development in Manicaland brought about community development through social, economic, environmental and cultural benefits. The authors suggest that there are interrelationships between tourism, poverty alleviation and community development. They show these interrelationships through a tourism and community-development framework which they developed based upon the results of the various methods of data collection used in this study.

African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure

Duduzile Boemah

The domestic tourism survey shows that the North West Province is ranked third for one-day special events, and fifth for more than one-day special events. Although the province supports village tourism through its villages, townships and small dorpies economic programme, village tourism is not well understood by many communities. Many studies have looked at the socio-economic impacts of events within the scope of what could be classified as events by the Western, failing to acknowledge the socio-economic impacts of events that are rooted from the African communities. As a result, numerous villages host events with social emphasis rather than economic advancements. Eighty-two community members attending the North West Provincial House of Traditional Leaders' launch at Tshidilamolomo Village were surveyed. Respondents were randomly selected and results were analysed through participatory theory and theory of margin. Communities prefer to share their cultural dances with tourists w...

Lwazi Apleni

This research was designed to assist the local community and tourism entrepreneurs to enhance their knowledge of needed engagement so as to bolster tourism to the area in question as a favoured attraction. The fundamental aim of this paper was thus to assess the level of community engagement in tourism development processes through the case of Elliotdale, Bulungula Lodge in the Eastern Cape Province. Tourism is considered to be a viable tool for economic development, specifically in the developing world. It was envisaged and deemed necessary to develop tourism in the local communities as it would generate community development, thus supporting its overall development. Apart from this, tourist sites enhance community cohesion and promote peace within the host community. The researchers argue that there is a sizeable gap between tourism stakeholders such as the local municipalities, small business enterprise and tourists with the communities in relation to tourism. Moreover, the findi...

The aim of this paper is to assess tourism as a catalyst for rural development and community awareness in a case study of Coffee Bay. Tourism is considered as a viable tool for economic development, specifically in the developing world. It was envisaged and deemed necessary to develop tourism in the local community as it would generate community development, thus supporting its overall development. Apart from this tourist sites enhance community cohesion and promote peace within the host community. The study adopted both qualitative and quantitative methods of data collection. Questionnaires were distributed to community members of Coffee Bay. Furthermore, a random sampling method was used for the purpose of the study. Data obtained was analysed through the use of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). The findings of the study revealed a high awareness and a high level of community willingness to participate in tourism ventures. Furthermore, findings of the study r...

This policy brief assesses community participation in the tourism industry of South Africa. It is aimed at assisting policy-makers, government and various bodies that play a pivotal role in the development of tourism. It is the view of this policy brief that participation of communities in tourism can be enhanced through the development of pro-poor livelihood strategies in areas where tourism can thrive with good infrastructure and an understanding of the expectations of the tourists as well as financial and human capital for the poor to be involved. The policy brief will also unpack some of the factors concerning community participation in tourism in the country. This is because community participation in South Africa has been a missed opportunity for communities and there are many factors that may be attributed to it.

elmarie Slabbert

Research on Humanities and Social Sciences

DOMINIC ROTICH

Orthodox Tefera

Rural tourism is an important means for the development of rural areas in the world. In South Africa, tourism was earmarked as being a potential economic pillar for the development of rural areas. Accordingly, the eThekwini Municipality initiated the Durban Green Corridor (DGC), which is a nongovernmental organisation with the aim of reducing unemployment and poverty using rural tourism. However, in order to use the full potential of tourism in these areas, the full involvement and unique nature of the culture of the community need to be considered. This study was conducted to investigate the involvement, perceptions and challenges of the community in the rural tourism development of Isithumba Village in eThekwini. A quantitative research method, using a questionnaire, was used to collect data. A sample size of 183 households was drawn from the 349 households living in the Isithumba Valley, comprising officials, youths, and residents in the different households. The findings of the ...

Dinah Mangope

Community-based tourism (CBT) has been promoted as a way of development whereby the sociocultural, environmental and economic needs of local communities are met through tourism product offerings. CBT is known to contribute to social and economic survival of the marginalised communities in developing countries and the preservation of natural resources in the affected areas. In developing countries tourism has often been observed as the spin around for small-scale enterprises and job creation, and therefore the uplifting of local community’s standard of living. Where CBT is practiced well, there is a potential to provide some exceptional opportunities for communities by offering not only better benefits but also enhancing their contribution in planning and management of tourism in their community. To progress towards sustainability, CBT must contribute to the empowerment of host communities. To achieve this, communities must be allowed to participate in decision-making where important...

Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs

Salme Ahlström

RELATED PAPERS

Journal of Hepatology

Regis Vilchez

NURIA NOVAS CASTELLANO

salud uninorte

Alejandra Herrera

Glorina Curammeng

Osman Demirhan

The American Journal of Pathology

juan ramon flores. t

Gazette Student Journal

sorour jalalvandi

Andika Ahsana

Papers. Revista de Sociologia

Margot Pujal I Llombart

2002 Annual Conference Proceedings

Richard Magin

Carlos Lancis

Journal of Labor Economics

Frank Mathewson

dendi syahriadi

Patricia K De Camillis

Tekİn Özdemİr

Rifat Akbiyikli

Instituto Geológico, Minero y Metalúrgico – INGEMMET

Orlando De La Cruz

87527357毕业证成绩单原版学位证假文凭 未能正常毕业？办理毕业证成绩单

Turkish Journal of Hematology

Burhan Turgut

Olga Valentim

Gigi Mondelo

IAEME PUBLICATION

IAEME Publication

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

a journal of research & art

• Contributors
• How to Cite EuropeNow
• Special Features
• Special Series
• Call for Applications: EuropeNow Editorial Committee 
• Current Issue
• Past Issues
• Editor’s Pick
• COVID-19 Series
• Ukraine Series
• Sponsored Research
• The Borders Project
• Favorite Books in Translation
• Campus Spotlights
• Campus Dispatches
• Campus Book Reviews
• Campus Interviews
• Special Campus Series
• Campus Round-Up
• Assessments & Lesson Plans
• Student Contributions
• CES-Sponsored Student Research
• Digital Classroom

Reconciling Neo-liberalism and Community Based Tourism in South Africa: The African Ivory Route

The commodification of culture in tourism is often critiqued and lamented in academic texts (Wishitemi et al. 2007). What this process often seems to entail is that so called “cultures” of local communities are showcased to tourists from around the world. Often, it is especially what is considered “exotic” and “indigenous” that is showcased to tourists (Wels 2004). This is the case in South Africa, for instance, regarding Zulu culture, however, white Afrikaner or English cultures in the same country are not promoted or put up for consumption by tourists. One of the reasons these practices is critiqued is because powerful tourist entrepreneurs are accused of “exploiting” less-powerful local communities for their carefully crafted and marketed exoticism (cf. Lindfors 1999) while not giving them enough in return, either financially speaking or in terms of management and decision-making (Spierenburg et al. 2011). In other words, “the winner takes it all” and the local communities are once again on the losing end. Would it be possible for communities to showcase their own local cultures, while at the same time earning a serious income and being involved with the management and decision making around the tourism venture? Is it possible to reconcile showcasing community cultures and local participation in tourism operations? To put it more abstractly, more conceptual and more radical: is it possible to reconcile neo-liberalism with the strong ideological principles of Community Based Tourism (CBT) (cf. Suansri 2003)? Or is this too good to be true?

We would like to present the South African case study of the African Ivory Route (AIR) that involves a partnership between a private sector tourism company, Transfrontier Parks Destinations (TFPD) and the AIR Secondary Cooperative. This latter legal based entity was established when the Provincial Government transferred ownership of the AIR to this entity representing the local communities. Provincial Government took this step when, after 2011, several tourism camps ceased operation due to financial constraints and a resulting lack of maintenance. TFPD teamed up with the provincial government, and continued to work together with all the communities like the provincial government had done before, in order to try and promote tourism as a viable livelihood strategy for the communities. But TFPD also intends and is in the process of extending the number of tents and huts in all the camps, generally upgrading them to comply with the demands of the industry. This process is not yet completed due to financial constraints. So, the operation continues based on the same ideological principles, but also with the explicit private sector’s aim to try and make a profit.

The question of whether it is possible to reconcile (aspects of) neo-liberalism with principles of Community Based Tourism is relevant given a recent academic, but also ideological, debate in tourism studies, between two academics, one Dutch, Stasja Koot (2016) and one South African, Keyan Tomaselli (2017), about how to assess the combination of commercial exploitation of a community owned lodge in the Kalahari. Based on two months of ethnographic fieldwork, Koot (2016) criticized the tourism entrepreneur, who happens to be the owner of Transfrontier Parks Destinations, for neoliberalism, while Tomaselli in a response article (2017) criticized the approach of the Dutch scholar, based on his own extensive fieldwork over years with TFPD management consent at !Xaus Lodge (Tomaselli 2012), arguing that aside from more theoretical considerations, Koot had not done proper fieldwork, had not triangulated his data, and as a consequence had come up with too speculative interpretations and conclusions, critiquing the neo-liberalism of !Xaus Lodge, while Tomaselli argued for the fact that !Xaus Lodge is a good example of where neo-liberalism and Community Based Tourism are reconciled. Here, we take a closer look at a trail of other destinations of TFPD, the African Ivory Route. What do the qualitative data tell us about this destination in relation to neo-liberalism and community involvement and ownership? Contradictions or reconciliation? Here, a Dutch and a South African academic write together. One of the authors, Chris Boonzaaier, has been involved with the development of the African Ivory Route from its inception and has combined his work on the route with years of ethnographic fieldwork. The other author, Harry Wels, has been working with Boonzaaier on tourism related research, and together they have supervised a number of South African and Dutch Master students doing their research on various topics in relation to the African Ivory Route.

The establishment of the African Ivory Route

In the late 1990s, the African Ivory Route (AIR) was initiated by the Directorate Tourism of the Limpopo Province, with the vision to make the Limpopo Province the preferred eco-cultural tourism destination in southern Africa (Directorate Tourism n.d. The Golden Horseshoe of Tourism). In order to achieve this, the route would be based on the metaphoric notion of a Golden Horseshoe. The Golden Horseshoe refers to a vast arc of land along the eastern, northern, and western borders of the Limpopo Province. Its outer core is predominantly land of which the majority is dedicated to wildlife conservation or ranching land in a comparatively unspoilt condition, or land that is rehabilitated. The inner core boasts a diversity of traditional cultural settlements and lifestyles. The product of the African Ivory Route was visualized as a combination of the cultural dimension (primarily the inner core) with the wildlife dimension (primarily located within the outer core). This would imply that communities would be given the opportunity to own tourism products within high potential provincial parks, which included so-called Big Five properties (where four of the five wildlife camps were located).

The strategy with the African Ivory Route development, as outlined in the development plans (Directorate Tourism n.d., The Golden Horseshoe of Tourism), was to assist disadvantaged communities who do not have the capacity, skills, or financial resources to become established as participants, at the level of operators and managers of products, in a highly competitive industry. The approach was thus for government first to identify cultural communities representative of the cultural diversity of the Limpopo Province, which they expected would have the potential cultural attractiveness that would draw tourists. Secondly, small community cultural homesteads (based on the traditional lay-out of cultural homesteads), as well as small tented safari camps (inside protected areas (reserves)), would be developed, both on state and community owned land, and then to lease these cultural homesteads and safari camps to the respective appropriate community structures for the sole purpose of tourist accommodation. Today, the African Ivory Route consists of eight destinations in the Limpopo Province, five cultural homesteads and three tented safari camps. Thirdly, cultural routes would be developed in the rural villages of the selected communities in order to enable tourists to observe and experience authentic indigenous cultures. In the fourth instance, all of these developments would empower local people in order to administer the camps and route themselves as an integrated product with joint marketing and centralized, coordinated marketing taken care of by the Provincial Government.

This latter meant that the respective communities had to be structured into legal entities. Originally, the community structures were esatblished as Community Tourism Associations but they did not have any legal status and were therefore subsequently changed and registered as Cooperatives – Primary Coops for the respective individual camps and a Secondary Coop with representation from all the resepctive Primary Coops. As such, communities had to nominate candidates to be trained as camp managers/operators towards which the government would also contribute. The intention was that government would play a purely facilitative role (Directorate Tourism n.d., Official Document).

The initial aims and objectives of the African Ivory Route as formulated by the Limpopo Provincial Government fall squarely into the alternative development paradigm of community-based tourism. But what happened to these ideals when a private sector tour operator, TFPD, in 2011 went into a partnership agreement with the African Ivory Route Secondary Cooperative and started to restructure its operations? How far were private sector interests for profit and a fitting neo-liberal approach to be reconciled with the initial community based tourism approach?

The African Ivory Route as a Community-based tourism development initiative

Academic research distinguishes and characterizes community-based tourism on the basis of the following criteria, people-centerdness, sensitivity towards the environment, sustainability, participation and empowerment (Scheyvens, 2002; Telfer, 2002: Timothy, 2002)

People centeredness

This principle distinguishes CBT, which form part of the alternative development paradigm, from all other development paradigms (Telfer 2002). However, it is not always spelled out exactly how people centeredness should be understood.

In the case of the African Ivory Route, this principle has been introduced by the establishment of cultural homesteads where only a limited number of visitors can be accommodated in order to reduce the cultural impact on the local community as far as possible. In addition, evening programs are presented in order to expose and entertain visitors to indigenous games and plays, indigenous cuisine and storytelling. In this way, a particular appreciation and understanding of the host community is expected to be created among visitors. People centeredness or cultural sensitivity is not only demonstrated at the cultural homesteads, but to some extent, also in respect of the location of the cultural homesteads.   

A representative example concerns the Baleni cultural homestead in the north eastern lowveld of the Limpopo Province (Kolkman, 2002). This homestead has been established close to the last unspoilt hot spring in South Africa. Apart from salt extraction from the soil surrounding the hot spring, the hot spring and the immediate area surrounding it are regarded as sacred. A few years after the establishment of the cultural homestead, the hot spring suddenly started to cool down. The local people ascribed it to the fact that no rituals had been performed before the visitor homestead was erected (Boonzaaier 2007). This case demonstrates that cultural impact assessments must be done prior to developments of this nature, preferably by anthropologists who are acquainted with the specific people. Government officials are not necessarily aware of cultural meanings and practices associated with particular sites and natural phenomena. Although this case could be interpreted as a lack of cultural sensitivity, it appears rather to be an issue of ignorance of particular cultural beliefs than anything else.

The development of cultural routes in the rural villages in order to expose visitors to (authentic) cultural practices was a significant step doing justice to the principle of people centeredness. In this way, tourists are enabled to experience the host community’s everyday life. In order to achieve this, local people from the respective communities were trained as tourist guides. In the training of these guides, particular attention was given to the concept of culture and how tourism could endanger it.

Sensitivity towards the environment

Too many developments in developing countries have experienced the appropriation of their natural environment, which is often endowed with cultural meaning and sacredness, by foreign developers as part of their neo-liberal approach to tourism. Robinson (1999:14) remarks that “(t)he environmental intrusions of the tourism industry are frequently cultural intrusions.” In the process, such communities have become estranged from their natural assets and very seldom receive any benefits from the tourism developed in this way.

To a certain extent, this also happened in the case of the African Ivory Route. An article of Chris Boonzaaier (2010) reveals that the Reserve was established without taking the cultural beliefs and practices of the relevant community, surrounding the Reserve, into consideration. The initiative to turn the area into a nature reserve was taken by the former Lebowa Bantustan, a creation of the Apartheid government in 1985 (Minutes of the Masebe Nature Reserve Management Committee, n.d.). The agreement was entered into with the chief (and his councillors). The government officials were obviously not aware of the cultural meanings attached to many of the mountains, and obviously the chief and his councillors did not tell them about it, and the possible impact that the fencing could have on the people adjacent to the Reserve who do attach meanings to the mountains. It appears that it is actually the people in the seven rural villages adjacent to the Reserve that have been affected by the fencing. Consequently, the community has become estranged from particular cultural practices that prior to the fencing of the Reserve had been performed inside the Reserve. This has led to considerable discontent among community members. The establishment of the African Ivory Route safari camp in the Reserve has not improved the situation. On condition that the Reserve starts benefitting the seven rural villages surrounding it, it is doubtful that their dicontent towards the Reserve will be resolved (Boonzaaier 2010). Within the context of CBT development these are challenges that the African Ivory Route Secondary Cooperative via its Primary Coop, will have to attend to. This case also demonstrates that the principle of people centeredness should not only be pursued in pure cultural practices, but also in respect of the environment. From the Directorate Tourism of Limpopo Province’s side there has also been positive operations in terms of sensitivity towards the environment. The safari tented camps for instance have been designed only to accommodate a limited number of vistors in order to keep the impact on the environment as low as possible (Directorate Tourismn.d., Official Document).

Sustainability, participation and empowerment in Community Based Tourism

Sustainable community-based tourism development requires the involvement of local communities. Different types of participation are distinguished by Timothy (2002). However, the ideal is that participation will take place at the level of decision-making, as well as the implementation and management of development projects. In this respect, the mission of the African Ivory Route to assist disadvantaged communities to become established as participants in the tourism industry, corresponds with the realization by researchers that indigenous communities are not only impacted upon by tourism but that they respond to it through entrepreneurial activity (Telfer 2002).

However, local involvement can only be achieved by empowering local communities (Telfer 2002; Timothy 2002; Scheyvens 2002). Probably one of the best examples of empowerment and entrepreneurial activity on the African Ivory Route has been the creation of a traditional cultural homestead by one of the local Tsonga community members. The purpose of this homestead is to serve as an educational facility for visiting school groups and to accommodate tourists. For this purpose, he worked hand in hand with Harold Kolkman, the Dutch Master student who, under the supervision of Harry Wels, had previously obtained his Master degree on natural resource management with Baleni as a case study. With Kolkman’s assistance this community member received R2 million from the European Union, which enabled him to establish the cultural homestead and so became an entrepreneur.

Another example of entrepreneurship was the creation of Telekishi cultural village by one of the Langa Ndebele community members adjacent to Masebe Nature Reserve. This village offers accommodation for up to sixteen people with complete self-catering facilities. Since its establishment, a considerable number of researchers from academic institutions have made use of this village. The accommodation tariff at Telekishi competes favorably with that of the African Ivory Route camp inside Masebe Nature Reserve. In addition, cultural dances are performed while exhibits of archaeology, geology, and rock art at the site and its surrounds are on display.

From the Directorate of Tourism’s side, training programs were provided in order to enable community members to become operators and managers of the safari camps and visitor homesteads on the Ivory Route. This training was supplemented by a company, Afrika Leadership, that was contracted by Boonzaaier to deliver education and training in respect of particular topics, such as culture, eco-system, tourism impacts, elementary bookkeeping, catering, drafting of a business plan, tourist guiding, destination marketing, entrepreneurship and leadership. In retrospect, these programs were maybe a bit too ambitious if the number of communities involved, the amount of money and the time available are taken into account. The fact is that the African Ivory Route had never developed to the extent that the management and promotion could be transferred to the respective communities. This situation was exaggerated by the low occupancy rates of particularly the cultural homesteads. As a result, the African Ivory Route could not sustain itself and remained totally dependent on the provincial government for the management, marketing, and remuneration of the staff members. The provincial budget, however, was not sufficient to address these challenges. Hence, by 2011, ten years after the start and initiation of the African Ivory Route, some cultural homesteads had to be closed. In order to rescue the African Ivory Route, the African Ivory Route Secondary Cooperative entered into a partnership agreement with a private company, Transfrontier Parks Destinations (TFPD).

Partnering with TFPD

Entering into a partnership with TFPD makes perfect sense, since it subscribes complteley to the same ideological principles as the African Ivory Route. In fact, this was one of the conditions that TFPD had to adhere to in order to enter into a partnership agreement with the African Ivory Route Secondary Cooperative.

So, the African Ivory Route remained to adhere to be people centered, sensitive towards the environment, emphasizing the empowerment of not only staff members, but also community members to establish entrepreneurships (personal communication). No matter that TFPD is a private sector company and adhering to and believing in the neo-liberal assumption that profits have to be made, this does not necessarily mean that TFPD cannot be activist in its ambitions towards social justice for local communities. Actually, it is a rather sweeping statement to assume that private sector interest will always be a barrier to achieving social justice or that private sector ambitions into that direction should always be looked upon with only suspicion.

In terms of people centeredness, TFPD has retained the existing community structures. These structures are the African Ivory Route Secondary Cooperative, which is a legal entity and the owner of the African Ivory Route. For each of the communities in whose areas safari camps or cultural homesteads have been erected, Primary Cooperatives as legal entities have been established. As a legal entity the African Ivory Route Secondary Cooperative went into the agreement with TFPD in 2012. TFPD is responsible for the management and marketing of the African Ivory Route as well as the training of employees.

The TFPD subscribes to the principles of democracy, sustainable development whilst maintaining cultural diversity, tolerance and individual freedom (personal communication, O’Leary 2018). TFPD is also responsible for the marketing. Well aware that tourism is a global phenomenon and that no tourism enterprise will survive without a global network, another important responsibility is the marketing of the African Ivory Route by TFPD internationally.

The African Ivory Route basically and generally adheres to the principles of Community-based tourism development. No matter the dynamics between academics and civil servants, this does not deny the intention of the African Ivory Route to adhere to the principle of people centeredness, environmental sensitivity, and sustainability of which the latter implies the participation of people who have been empowered to do so.

TFPD’s approach towards the African Ivory Route and its subscription of the principles of CBT, is clear proof that neo-liberalism can best be reconciled with the principles of CBT through a form of social entrepreneurship. In fact, it is the opinion that a narrow minded clinging to the principles of CBT would be detrimental. The AIR started to make a name for itself when it combined and reconciled aspects of a neo-liberal approach to tourism with clear CBT ambitions. This only happened after TFPD partnered with the Limpopo Provincial Government on the AIR. The exercise also clearly illustrates that academics can play a role in the identification and investigation of issues that arise in a project of this nature. Where undiluted neo-liberalism might only see the instrumental benefit of academic involvement towards realizing profit maximization, it could well be that we have by now entered a different era, an era where challenges we are facing in the world of today, ranging from climate change to increasing economic inequalities, demand a rethinking and reconciliation of neo-liberalism with ambitions towards social justice. Social entrepreneurialism might be one answer to this call. This also seems to be the tone of the call of the latest World Economic Forum, where in a Dutch national newspaper it was reported that “radical times ask for radical answers” (REF,). The social entrepreneurialism of TFPD in the context of the AIR might be a South African answer to that call.

Chris Boonzaaier is an Associate Professor in the Department of Anthropology and Archaeology at the University of Pretoria, South Africa.  In 1997 he was appointed as programme manager of a newly introduced degree course specialising in Heritage and Cultural Tourism. His publications in this field include ‘Community perceptions of tourism in the Tshivhase area of the Limpopo Province, South Africa.’ Anthropology Southern Africa Vol. 35(3&4), together with JHF Grobler (2012); ‘Towards a community-based integrated institutional framework for ecotourism management: the case of the Masebe Nature Reserve, Limpopo Province of South Africa . ‘ Journal of Anthropology  (2012); Juxtaposing a cultural reading of landscape with institutional boundaries: the case of Masebe Nature Reserve, South Africa. Landscape Research , 7, together with Harry Wels (2016); ‘Authenticity lost? The significance of cultural villages in the conservation of heritage in South Africa. ‘ Journal of Heritage Tourism , together with Harry Wels (2017).

Harry Wels is an Associate Professor at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and Publication Manager at the African Studies Centre Leiden at Leiden University. His research interest are in private wildlife conservation, tourism and animal studies in Southern Africa. His publications include Securing wilderness landscapes in South Africa. Nick Steele, private wildlife conservancies and saving rhinos, Leiden (2015) and ‘Rewilding white lions: Conservation through the eyes of carnivores?’ in ‘Wildlife conservation in Southern Africa: Taking stock’ (Leiden, in press).

Photo: Signposting the African Ivory Route by Harry Wels; Salt production at Baleni by Chris Boonzaaier

Boonzaaier, C.C. 2007. Community Dynamics and the quest for Sustainable Tourism Development: An Exploratory Study , in: Wishitemi, B., Spenceley, A & Wels, H. (eds.) Culture and Community: Tourism Studies in Eastern and Southern Africa . Rozenberg Publishers: Amsterdam.

Boonzaaier, C. C 2010 Rural people’s perceptions of wildlife conservation – the case of Masebe Nature Reserve in Limpopo Province of South Africa. Anthropology Southern Africa 33(1&2), 55-64.

Cukier, W., Trenholm, S., Carl, D, and Gekas, G. (2011) Social entrepreneurship: A content analysis, Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability , 7(1), 99-119

Directorate Tourism, n.d. Minutes of the Masebe Nature Reserve Management Committee meetings . Diretorate Tourism, Limpopo Province.

Directorate Tourism, n.d. The Golden Horseshoe of Tourism: A framework for tourism development in the Northern Province. Directorate Tourism, Limpopo Province.

Directorate Tourism, n.d. Official Document.

Hamilton, C. (1998) Terrific majesty: The powers of Shaka Zulu and the limits of historical intervention , Cape Town: David Philip.

Kolkman, H. 2002 Baleni: A research on community based natural resource management in South Africa . Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit.

Koot, S.P. (2016) Contradictions of capitalism in the South African Kalahari: Indigenous Bushmen, their brand and baasskap in tourism, Journal of Sustainable Tourism , 24(8-9), 1211-1226.

Lindfors, B. (1999) (ed.) Africans on stage. Studies in ethnological show business , Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, Cape Town: David Philip.

Robinson, M. 1999 Cultural conflicts in tourism: Inevitability and inequality, in: Robinson, M. & Boniface, P. Tourism and cultural conflicts . CABI Publishing, 1-32).

Scheyvens, R. 2002. Tourism for development: empowering communities . Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

Spierenburg, M., Steenkamp, C. and Wels H. (2011) Resistance of local communities against marginalisation in the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Conservation Area, in: Salman, T. and de Thije, M. (eds.) Local battles, global stakes. The globalization of local conflicts and the localization of global interests , Amsterdam: VU University Press, 259-278.

Suansri. P. (2003) Community Based Tourism Handbook , Thailand: REST Project.

Telfer, D. J. 2002. The Evolution of Tourism and Development Theory, in: Sharpley, R. & Telfer, D. J. (eds.) Tourism and Development, Concepts and Issues . England: Channel View Publications.

Timothy, D. J. 2002. Tourism and community development Issues, in: Sharpley R. & Telfer, D. J. (eds.) Tourism and Development, Concepts and Issues . England: Channel View Publications.

Tomaselli, K. (2017) Picking on the poor: The contradictions of theory and neo-liberal critique. A response to Stasja Koot’s paper on contradictions of capitalism for Indigenous tourism in the South African Kalahari, Journal of Sustainable Tourism , 25(8), 1182-1196.

Wels, H. (2004) About romance and reality: Popular European imagery in postcolonial tourism in southern Africa, in: Hall, C.M. and Tucker, H. (eds.) Tourism and postcolonialism. Contested discourses, identities and representations , London, New York: Routledge.

Wishitemi, B. Spencely, A. and Wels, H. (2007) (eds.) Culture and community. Tourism studies in Eastern and Southern Africa , Amsterdam: Rozenberg Publishers.

Wylie, D. (2009) White myths of Shaka, in: Carton, B. Laband, J. and Sithole, J. (eds.) Zulu identities. Being Zulu, past and present , Pietermaritzburg: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.

Published on March 1, 2018.

Nine Poems by Tanella Boni

The Return of Politics, the End of Merkel? Germany’s New…

© 2016-2024 EuropeNow. All Rights Reserved.

Just in: fly-in safaris now on offer to Tintswalo Safari

7 things to learn from people who live in Blue Zones

Things to do in and around Ulundi

6 affordable weekend getaways in Hartbeespoort Dam

5 KZN curry spots to try when that curry craving hits

Over 85 South African towns renamed, more to come

10 reasons why every South African should visit Joburg at least once

5 lightweight hiking snacks you may not have thought of before

5 community-based lodges to try in south africa.

Tourism in South Africa is the fastest-growing and one of the largest economic contributors to our GDP, making up 7.1%.

It may not be the answer to all of South Africa’s problems, but through supporting tourism growth, the country could reap many benefits.

Five such communities have realised this and are creating unique experiences for travellers through their community-based lodges. In return, guests who stay in these lodges contribute to the communities’ local economies, constant job creation, and even education.

These five community-based lodges will have you going back again and again for the luxury, experience, and one-of-a-kind holiday, while subsequently benefitting a community.

1. Tamboti Bush Camp, Somkhanda Community Game Reserve, KZN

Picture: Somkhanda Community Game Reserve

Somkhanda is a ‘flagship project for land restitution and transformation in South Africa.’

During the 2005 land reform process, the Gumbi community claimed 35 000 ha of land. They chose to keep most of the land under conservation and develop a game reserve that could economically benefit the community. Somkhanda Game Reserve became the first community-owned game reserve to be formally named a nature reserve in February 2009.

Through resource-utilisation practices and sustainable tourism, this Big 5 game reserve serves as an economic stream for both the Gumbi community and neighbouring ones.

Somkhanda is the first community-owned land to have taken part in the WWF Black Rhino Range Expansion Programme , introducing the critically endangered black rhino onto their reserve.

Further, through their metapopulation conservation programmes, they have successfully maintained a healthy wild dog population, among many other conservation successes.

The community actively plays a role, even a leading role, in providing jobs and resources in society, as well as rolling out successful conservation programmes.

• Rates:  R3 000 p p s
• Location:  R69, Mkuze, KwaZulu-Natal
• Contact:  [email protected]

2. Buffalo Ridge Safari Lodge, Madikwe Game Reserve, NW

Picture: Buffalo Ridge Safari Lodge

This is one of South Africa’s first wholly-owned community-based safari lodges.

The Balete Ba Lekgophung community who own the lodge reside in a village just outside the Madikwe Game Reserve. All staff, trackers, and guides originate from the Lekgophung village. Further, community members can train for careers in the tourism industry at Buffalo Ridge Safari Lodge.

In partnership with The Nature Workshop and North-West Parks, they have a 45-year lease to run the lodge and benefit from the revenue and opportunities that come with it.

Staying at Buffalo Ridge will give you the opportunity to visit the community, potentially ‘meet the Kgosi (chief), and learn about the ethnic heritage, cultures, and ancestral history of the local people.’

• Rates:  From R6 111 p p (vary according to season)
• Location:  Madikwe Game Reserve, R49
• Website:  madikwereserve.org

3.Tintswalo Safari Lodge, Manyeleti Game Reserve, Mp

Picture: Manyeleti Game Reserve

Manyeleti Game Reserve borders the Kruger National Park, Sabi Sands, and Timbavati Game Reserves.

Founded in 1963, it was the only game reserve that non-whites were allowed to visit during apartheid. It had few visitors and even less governmental support.

Today, the game reserve is owned and managed by the Mnisi Tribe. They successfully claimed the land in line with South Africa’s Restitution of Land Rights Act. Three privately owned lodges have been built in the reserve on a concession basis, leasing the land from the Mnisi community.

Because the reserve is relatively unknown compared to its neighbours, it’s more isolated and exclusive. It offers visitors an escape from the noise and busyness of everyday life.

• Rates:  From R 13,764 p p (Season dependent)
• Location:  Manyeleti Game Reserve, Mpumalanga
• Website:  manyeleti.com

4.Bulungula Eco-Lodge, EC

If you’re in the mood for a beach vacation, consider a stay at Bulungula Eco-Lodge. Bulungula is 100% owned and managed by the coastal Xhosa community which lives in Ngileni village.

Stay in a traditional Xhosa rondavel, go fishing with the local fishermen, join a guided hike, or learn how to drum. Everything you partake in is run by the community and sustains them.

On top of supporting the local community, the lodge aims for carbon neutrality, as well as integrating development strategies in nutrition, health, education, and sustainable livelihoods.

• Rates:  From R660 p p (Forest Cabins)
• Location:  Bulungula/ Nqileni Village, Elliotdale District, Eastern Cape
• Website:  bulungula.co.za

5.!Xaus Lodge, Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park, NC

The Mier and ‡Khomani San communities reached a historic land settlement agreement with SANParks and the South African government in 2002. The two communities now own a portion of land within the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park, but lease it back to SANParks.

The settlement agreement allowed for funds to be used by the community for building and owning the ‘Co-operation Lodge,’ otherwise known as !Xaus Lodge, and has become another of South Africa’s unique community-based lodges.

Black-empowered Lodge Management Company, Transfrontier Parks Destination manages the lodge on behalf of the two communities. The ‡Khomani San and Mier receive a monthly rental fee and almost all employees at the lodge come from the local communities.

• Rates:  R3 900 p p
• Location:  91st Dune, off the Auob River Road, Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park, Northern Cape
• Website: xauslodge.co.za

Pictures: Getaway Gallery

Note: Prices may be subject to change

Follow us on social media for more travel news, inspiration, and guides. You can also tag us to be featured. 

TikTok  |  Instagram  |  Facebook  |  Twitter

ALSO READ: 5 Eco-friendly getaways in South Africa

Related Articles

17 April 2024

12 things you should always pack when you go camping

Privacy overview.

Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.

Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.

WOWZULU to boost community-based tourism

Community-based tourism has received a massive boost with the recent launch of WOWZULU, an initiative that seeks to create inclusive tourist destinations that serve as a best-case South African model for the sector.

This is according to Tourism Deputy Minister Elizabeth Thabethe, who launched the project at the Luthuli Museum in Groutville, in KwaZulu-Natal on Friday.

“The first phase of the project focuses on supporting tour guides involved in emerging community tourism, eateries selling local cuisine, youth owned coffee outlets, craft entrepreneurs, storytelling performers and dancers in Isandlwana Battlefields in the Nqutu area, Ohlange in the Inanda Valley, Ballito in the North Coast, Tembe in the Far North, KwaNzimakwe in the South Coast, Khula Village in St. Lucia Wetlands Park and eMazizizni Village in the Northern Drakensberg,” the department said on Saturday.

Already implemented in seven tourist destinations in KZN, the project is expected to inspire district municipalities across the country to become more sustainable environmentally, socially and economically while injecting life and offering hope for the rural unemployed.

“Responsible tourism is of paramount importance to the tourism sector hence South Africa was the first country to include this concept in its national tourism policy, the 1996 White Paper on the Development and Promotion of Tourism in South Africa,” said Thabethe.

Citing the document, the Deputy Minister said responsible tourism is an approach to the management of tourism aimed at maximising economic, social and environmental benefits and minimising costs to destinations.

South Africa, she said, is the pioneer of responsible tourism standards while the country was second only to Brazil to having a national minimum standard on responsible tourism.

“The historic launch is opening opportunities for growth and development of the tourism sector while contributing to the objective of the National Development Plan and the national imperative to fight poverty, unemployment and inequality,” Thabethe said.

The Deputy Minister commended the partnership of Africa Ignite, Better Tourism Africa, One Planet-Handle with Care’ Trust Fund including the United Nationals Environment Fund with the National Department of Tourism to ensure that the local environment, economy and society benefit through the project.

ILembe District Municipality Deputy Mayor Dolly Shandu, representing Enterprise iLembe, expressed appreciation that the project was empowering women.

Her counterpart in the KwaDukuza municipality, Deputy Mayor Councillor Dolly Govender said that the programme will promote tourism to showcase the four blue drop beaches in the area. –  SAnews.gov.za