trek x caliber 9 vs scott scale 965

Bike Comparison

Ask the 99 Spokes community on Discord

For Bikes Like These

Based on frame geometry and build specs.

Based on build material and quality level of the frame, fork, wheelset, groupset, suspension system, and more.

A bike with lower gearing will be easier to ride up steep hills, while a higher top end means it will pedal faster down hills.

X-Caliber 9

(descending)

• Forum Listing
• Marketplace
• Advanced Search
• MTBR Discussion Forums
• What Bike to Buy

Trek X-Caliber 9 or Scott Scale 965?

• Add to quote

Trek X-Caliber 9 Hardtail Mountain Bike 2021 Matte Nautical Navy

SCOTT Scale 965 Bike

Reaperactual said: The one issue I noticed on your link is a big discrepancy between the pictures and initial spec compared to the technical spec lower down saying the Trek is fitted with an entry level Sram SX 12 speed drivetrain instead of a Shimano drivetrain? This could simply be a mistake in the listing on the Leisure Lake Bikes website. Looked at this clip and that states it's the SLX/XT drivetrain but also worth a watch for a closer look:- Overall and like you said they are very similar in nearly every other aspect and a close call between the two choices. I can understand your difficulty in which one to choose.? Click to expand...

eb1888 said: Both those bikes have old short reach steep head tube angle XC geo frames. The frames haven't been updated in years. Pretty much a waste of money, imo. Trek also has nothing yet. Newer models are a Giant Fathom 2 (new for 2021) Link. and a Specialized Fuse Comp (new for 2020). Link. This Vitus would be decent for less. Link. While this Vitus has a much better Marzocchi Z2 fork. 11sp is good. Link. You'll notice these bikes have 30mm inner width rims. Imo this or wider is critical to getting performance out of 2.35-2.6" 29 tires at lower pressure. More traction and control. A Nukeproof Scout 290 is another example. Link. The RS Recon fork is much lower in performance than the Z2. Stanton bikes are UK designed and high quality. Like the Switch9er Link. Also available in ti frame for a softer ride and less weight. REVIEW: The 2020 Specialized Fuse Comp 29 - Hardtail Party - YouTube Stanton Switch9er Review: Hardtails on Hard Trails: Captain Ahab on a UK Steel Hardcore Hardtail - YouTube Click to expand...

Top Contributors this Month

Comparar bikes

Trek X-Caliber 9 2021 vs Scott Scale 965 2021

Assine a nossa newsletter.

Receba no seu email as últimas novidades no mundo do ciclismo, lançamentos, tendências, calendário de provas e muito mais.

Não se preocupe, nós odiamos SPAM assim como você.

Compare bikes

Trek X-Caliber 8 2021 vs Scott Scale 965 2021

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Receive the latest news in the world of cycling, new bike releases, trends and much more.

Don't worry, we hate SPAM just like you.

Trek X-Caliber 8 hardtail review

• February 14, 2023

There are plenty of plus-points to the Trek X-Caliber 8 hardtail mountain bike, like reliable components and a sure-footed feel

Product Overview

Overall rating:, trek x-caliber 8 2022.

• Tubeless-ready wheels and tyres
• Heaviest bike on test

Manufacturer:

Price as reviewed:.

The Trek X-Caliber 8 is a sure-footed 29er hardtail mountain bike, with plenty of reliable elements that boost its score to impressive levels, but a few missteps that hold it back from quite making it as one of the best hardtail mountain bikes we’ve tested. There’s a whole lot to like though.

Twenty nine inch wheels have long been an integral part of Trek’s mountain bikes, especially the hardtails. And where initially there was uncertainty and hesitation in the industry, Trek pushed on with this larger wheel size and the persistence paid off: with 29in wheels now accepted globally and across all mountain bike categories, not just for the cross country crowd.

Trek’s early 29in wheel bikes were XC hardtails and since then, the X-Caliber has shifted upmarket and now sit between the entry-level Marlin and the carbon Pro-Caliber. All three platforms run 100mm travel forks.

We’ve pulled in the X-Caliber 8 for this review, which is just shy of the Scott Scale 965 in price and shares many of the same components. With all four bikes on test running Shimano brakes and 1×12 transmissions, we were keen to take this consistency a step further and chose models with regular seatposts, rather than droppers. Primarily for comparing the weight of the bikes, but riding dynamics and overall value played a part too as we felt it really levelled the playing field, and maintained the XC hardtail design ethos.

With a steeply sloping top tube and a super-low standover height the X-Caliber is a very striking bike. It’s a silhouette that’s mirrored through all the brand’s hardtails – with the notable exception of the carbon Pro-Caliber – as is the wide size range that Trek is well known for offering. Seven frame sizes are available (with the XS and S rolling on 27.5in wheels to keep proportions in check) with a useful M/L option that’s a great problem solver for riders stuck between the popular M and L options. So hats off to Trek for this level of commitment to getting a good fitting bike.

When it comes to new frame standards, Trek has always been an early adopter, so it’s no surprise to see a tapered head tube and Boost hub spacing on the X-Caliber frame. But it’s Boost with a twist… here, Trek using 141mm rear dropout spacing with a traditional Q/R hub, rather than a 148mm bolt-thru design.

It’s not a deal breaker though, as the fixed rear triangle of a hardtail doesn’t need stiffening up like a full suspension design, and a quick online search reveals plenty of wheel upgrade options from the likes of Hunt, Hope and Bontrager for the 141 standard.

A modern touch that hasn’t been executed as well as on other bikes in test, is the internal frame routing for the cable and rear brake hose – they’re not clamped where they enter the down tube and rattle noisily on rough terrain, just like on the Trek Roscoe in our Hardtail of the Year test.

Trek has equipped the X-Caliber 8 with a RockShox fork and it’s listed as a Judy SL, so we expected to see an upgrade or two. However, all the tech is identical to the regular Judy forks seen on the Cube and Scott – a tapered aluminium steerer, steel upper legs, a Solo Air spring and the brand’s basic TurnKey damper.

The Trek is the only bike in test that doesn’t have a remote lockout lever though, just a simple dial on the top of the fork leg, with an on/off function and no graded adjustment between those points. At least it’s one less cable to maintain and gives more handlebar space for a dropper post remote lever.

And while the X-Caliber frame does not use a bolt-thru rear axle, the 100mm travel Judy fork does have the 15x110mm Boost hub standard – although the website lists the lighter tooled axle as standard, our test bike had the same QR lever operated version as the Scott Scale.

Shimano was slow to filter its 1×12 transmissions down to the lower price points, but it’s there now and proving to be a very popular choice, all four bikes in this test using Shimano drivetrains. The X-Caliber’s specification lists a Shimano chainset, but our bike shipped with a model from FSA, and it’s the only deviation from a complete Shimano drivetrain.

Trek has also gone with a smaller 30t chainring and combined with the Deore 10-51t cassette you get a super-low gear, which is useful on the climbs because at 13.53kg (29.82lb) the Trek is the heaviest bike in test.

Another wise move is the genuine Shimano chain which performs faultlessly in wet filthy conditions and plays well with the steel FSA chainring. The benchmark XT rear mech is good to see, as is the rubber chainstay protector, which is a detail the other three brands seemed to have overlooked.

Performance

The dropped top tube, wider 750mm bar, long wheelbase and slackish 68º head angle (the slackest of the four bikes) give the X-Caliber the look and feel of a trail bike. However, the Trek’s geometry and attitude is not in the same league as the most progressive 100mm trail hardtails such as Kona’s test-winning Mahuna .

Even on this size XL, the frame’s front triangle is very compact, especially when compared to the Giant XTC, but it still sports two sets of bottle cage mounts – essential on an XC bike. In fact, Trek has added plenty of mounts to the X-Caliber, with fittings for a rack and kickstand making it a very capable all-terrain bike.

With one of the lightest wheelsets on test, we expected some zip and liveliness from the X-Caliber but it lacked the immediate urgency of the Scott and Giant and on longer non-stop cross country blasts, its weight was noticeable, certainly towards the end of the ride.

You can’t knock the Trek’s sure-footed nature though – the lengthy wheelbase (for an XC hardtail) and wide bar aid stability, and it was only the Judy fork’s lack of refinement that held us back from diving into more challenging terrain. A slightly shorter stem would no doubt help here too.

Although the compact front end still has a tall 525mm seat tube, the seat stays are dropped, giving a tighter rear triangle. This certainly gives the X-Caliber a chuckable hardtail vibe, but the ride quality was a touch less compliant than the other bikes here.

With that in mind, there’s plenty of frame and fork clearance for higher volume tyres to help smooth the ride further, and Trek helpfully supplies the X-Caliber 8 with rim strips, valves and sealant so you can go tubeless straight from the box and reap the benefits immediately.

• Best hardtail mountain bikes
• Best mountain bike helmets: a bunch of brilliant brain-savers
• How to avoid arm pump when mountain biking

With a sure-footed ride, reliable Shimano components and a sorted tubeless wheelset, it feels like there’s a trail bike hiding under the X-Caliber’s glossy frame finish just waiting to get out, but being held back by the fork and lack of a dropper post. Stepping up a model to the X-Caliber 9 would be our recommendation then, as it gets a dropper post and a more capable and refined fork. Ultimately, the Trek X-Caliber 8’s weight is noticeable and even with the same control tyres fitted to all of the test bikes, the Trek lacks the race-bike urgency of the Scott and Giant.