trek 1.2 women's road bike 2010

• off.road.cc
• Dealclincher
• Fantasy Cycling

Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

• Sportive and endurance bikes
• Gravel and adventure bikes
• Urban and hybrid bikes
• Touring bikes
• Cyclocross bikes
• Electric bikes
• Folding bikes
• Fixed & singlespeed bikes
• Children's bikes
• Time trial bikes
• Accessories - misc
• Computer mounts
• Bike bags & cases
• Bottle cages
• Child seats
• Lights - front
• Lights - rear
• Lights - sets
• Pumps & CO2 inflators
• Puncture kits
• Reflectives
• Smart watches
• Stands and racks
• Arm & leg warmers
• Base layers
• Gloves - full finger
• Gloves - mitts
• Jerseys - casual
• Jerseys - long sleeve
• Jerseys - short sleeve
• Shorts & 3/4s
• Tights & longs
• Bar tape & grips
• Bottom brackets
• Brake & gear cables
• Brake & STI levers
• Brake pads & spares
• Cassettes & freewheels
• Chainsets & chainrings
• Derailleurs - front
• Derailleurs - rear
• Gear levers & shifters
• Handlebars & extensions
• Inner tubes
• Quick releases & skewers
• Energy & recovery bars
• Energy & recovery drinks
• Energy & recovery gels
• Heart rate monitors
• Hydration products
• Hydration systems
• Indoor trainers
• Power measurement
• Skincare & embrocation
• Training - misc
• Cleaning products
• Lubrication
• Tools - multitools
• Tools - Portable
• Tools - workshop
• Books, Maps & DVDs
• Camping and outdoor equipment
• Gifts & misc

The 1.2 is the middle of Trek's three 1 Series aluminium road bikes, sitting between the Shimano Claris-equipped 1.1 (£575) and the 1.5 (£750), which comes with Shimano Tiagra components.

Is it the right bike for you? We've picked out four reasons why it might be, along with a reason that might make you think twice.

1 It provides solid performance with few surprises

The 1.2 puts in a solid performance out on the road, offering a stable, predictable ride, the only real disappointment being the lack of braking power (see below).

Hitting the scales at 9.48kg (20.9lb), the 1.2 isn't as lively as many lighter bikes, but for £650 this is certainly a decent enough weight. Compared to bikes of a similar price, it accelerates well. You'll find a little more flex in the frame and fork than in higher level models in Trek's range, but this is a bike that's well capable of holding its own when you crank up the power.

You could't say that the 1.2 is the fastest climber but it's far from sluggish when things get lumpy. It's helped in its hill-climbing endeavours by a compact chainset (with 50-tooth and 34-tooth chainrings rather than 52 or 53 and 39). Most bikes of this price come with something similar these days. Matched up to an 11-28-tooth cassette, it'll allow you to get up the vast majority of gradients without your knees popping or your lungs bursting, while still providing enough big gears to keep you bowling along quickly on the flat and downhill.

Aluminium frames have a reputation for feeling harsh but that's a gross generalisation. Some are jarring – as some carbon frames are – but plenty aren't. This bike is certainly comfortable enough for racking up the big miles.

For a start, it comes in Trek's H2 fit. That requires a brief explanation. Compared to Trek's H1 fit, H2 has a taller head tube: 3cm taller in the case of our 58cm test model. Why? It puts you into a more upright riding position with less strain on your lower back and neck. You could achieve a similar position by adding a bunch of headset spacers on an H1 bike, but if you want your bars at that height, you're better off going for an H2 fit because the front end will be stiffer and the handling will be better.

The Bontrager Race VR-C alloy handlebar has a shallower drop than usual too: 124mm rather than the 145mm you get on Bontrager's Race Lite Classic, for example. That means it's that much easier to get down on the drops. A lot of people have a bar with a deep drop and rarely take their hands off the hoods.

The other reason for the comfort is that the 1.2 is inherently pretty smooth. Sure, there are plenty of bikes out there that will filter our more road vibration but this one does a decent enough job on that front. Swapping the 23mm tyres for 25s would add more comfort but this bike isn't crying out for them by any means.

The Bontrager Gel Cork bar tape provides good cushioning for your hands and the Bontrager Affinity 1 saddle has plenty of padding too. Truth be told, I found it a little too soft, verging on squidgy, but everyone has their own taste when it comes to saddles.

2 You get a neat, well-proven frame and fork

All three bikes in the 1 Series share the same 100 Series Alpha Aluminium frame. It's fairly busy looking with a squared off upper edge to the down tube that makes it resemble that of Trek's more costly Madone.

The top tube slopes towards the seat tube junction and tapers down as it does so, and slim seatstays provide compliance at the back.

You get mounts for a mudguard and a rack back there too. They'll be useful if you want to ride the bike year round and perhaps carry stuff to and from work on a daily commute.

You don't get the oversized bottom bracket or tapered head tube that are regular features designed to add stiffness to higher-end performance bikes, but this is a £650 bike and the frame is good for the money. The welds are pretty tidy throughout and the same can be said of the paint job.

The fork is Trek's own with carbon blades and an alloy steerer. Like the frame, it comes with eyelets for fitting mudguards that will save a lot of faffing.

It's worth noting that the Trek 1.2 is available in eight sizes from 47cm up to 62cm. That range will cover nearly everyone.

3 Shimano's Sora shifters and mechs are excellent for the money

Nine-speed Sora is Shimano's fifth tier road groupset (if you don't count the electronic variants) and it offers fantastic value for money.

Back in the olden days (before last year), you changed gear on Sora by pushing the brake lever to the side or by using a small thumb lever on the side of the shifter body, depending on the direction you wanted to shift.

Now, though, Sora levers are Dual Control, so instead of that thumb lever, there's a lever tucked behind the brake lever. It's the same design that Shimano use right up to top-level Dura-Ace and it's a big improvement, making it far easier to change gear from the drops.

Resting your hands on the hoods is comfortable and there's a little gear indicator on the top of each of the levers that you might find useful. I can't say I ever checked them – I just couldn't get into the habit – but they're there if you want to.

Whereas the gear cables run underneath the bar tape on Shimano's higher level groupsets, they head out from the side of the levers with Sora and loop around to the frame in the fresh air. That's certainly not a problem from a functional point of view, although visually it's a less tidy way of doing things. That's being picky, though. Sora shifting has taken a massive leap forward with this latest design. It works very much like the highest level offerings from Shimano, just adding a little weight. Even there, the difference isn't massive.

Trek don't give you a complete Sora groupset here, just the shifters and mechs. The chainset is FSA Vero, a square taper design that does its job just fine, and the brakes, as mentioned, are unbranded.

Most other big brand bikes at this price, such as the Giant Defy 3 (£649) and the Felt F95 (£649), have Shimano Sora components too. It's worth comparing the spec sheets to see exactly how they match up, but don't buy a bike solely on that basis.

4 Bontrager's wheels and other components are good, reliable kit

The wheels are made up from Bontrager's own alloy hubs, containing cup and cone (rather than cartridge) bearings, and Tubeless Ready http://www.bontrager.com/technology/why_tubeless_ready rims. That means you can run the wheels without inner tubes at some point in the future, although you'll need to upgrade to Tubeless Ready tyres first.

The tyres that come fitted as standard are Bontrager's T1s (700 x 23). They're some pretty hefty rubber, made for durability rather than all-out speed, but they're reasonably resistant to punctures and they hold the road well even in damp conditions.

I had no problems at all with the wheels during the month-long test period. They're not the lightest wheels ever, taking some coaxing up to speed, but they're still as round and as true as they were out of the box, and there's a lot to be said for trouble-free operation. Fast wheels aren't so fast when you're standing on the side of the road trying to remove a broken spoke.

Most of the rest of the kit is no-nonsense stuff from Bontrager too, the handlebar, stem and seatpost being reliable alloy options and the Affinity 1 saddle providing at least as much cushioning as most people will want.

And the compromises

There are no two ways about it, the 1.2's brakes are disappointing. Trek have put the Shimano Sora theme to one side here and specced nameless dual pivot callipers that lack bite. Don't get me wrong, they're consistent and they'll stop you, just not as quickly as you might like. You have to engage the brakes for a bit longer than normal or pull the levers a bit harder to get down to your desired speed.

You adjust to this within a ride or two and don't really think about it until you ride with people who have better brakes on their bikes, or jump back on to a bike with better brakes yourself. Then you're struck by the contrast.

Swapping the brake pads helps, but the bottom line is that these brakes are a compromise to make a price point and, for me, they're the weakest aspect of the entire bike.

Other compromises? There's nothing that really stands out. Trek offer a decent all-round package here.

The Trek 1.2 is a very good bike for the money. The frame and fork are sound, reliable options and the Sora shifters and mechs are better than anything previously available for this kind of cash. They're a great example of the benefits of trickle down technology.

Yes, if you pay a couple of hundred pounds more you'll get a lighter bike that leaps into life more eagerly when you up the intensity for a sprint or tough climb, but that's always the way. As it is, the Trek 1.2 is a very able road bike that'll reward your efforts with decent speed, and it's comfortable enough to ride all day long. The fact that it comes with mudguard and rack eyelets increases its versatility, so you can use it as a year-round workhorse if that's what you're after.

We'd have no hesitation recommending this bike for someone after their first proper road bike, or for anyone else looking for plenty of value.

Very good value, ideal for anyone looking for a first real road bike, with just the brakes as a low point

road.cc test report

Make and model: Trek 1.2

Size tested: 58

About the bike

State the frame and fork material and method of construction. List the components used to build up the bike.

Frame 100 Series Alpha Aluminium

Fork Trek carbon road

Sizes 47, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62cm

Front hub Bontrager alloy

Rear hub Bontrager alloy

Rims Bontrager Tubeless Ready

Tyres Bontrager T1, 700x23c

Shifters Shimano Sora, 9 speed

Front derailleur Shimano Sora

Rear derailleur Shimano Sora

Crank FSA Vero, 50/39/30 (triple)

Cassette SRAM PG-950, 11-28, 9 speed

Pedals Nylon body w/alloy cage, toe-clip/strap

Chain KMC X9

Bontrager Affinity 1

Seatpost Bontrager Alloy, 2-bolt head, 27.2mm, 8mm offset

Handlebar Bontrager Race, VR-C, 31.8mm

Stem Bontrager Elite Blendr, w/computer & light mounts, 31.8mm, 7 degree

Headset 1-1/8" semi-cartridge bearings

Brakeset Alloy dual-pivot

Accessories

Bar tape Bontrager gel cork tape

Tell us what the bike is for, and who it's aimed at. What do the manufacturers say about it? How does that compare to your own feelings about the bike?

Trek say: "1 Series aluminium road bikes feature the same aero shaping and race-ready detail as our top-end bikes. They're strong, light, and built to fly over the pavement," [Trek, being from the US, use "pavement" to mean the surface of a road rather than a path].

Frame and fork

Tell us about the build quality and finish of the frame and fork?

It's a tried and tested frame built to a high quality. The same goes for the carbon leg/alloy steerer fork.

Tell us about the materials used in the frame and fork?

The frame is made from aluminium: what Trek call 100 Series Alpha Aluminium.

Tell us about the geometry of the frame and fork?

The 1.2 is built to Trek's H2 geometry that I've explained in the body of the review. Essentially, it's slightly more relaxed than a full-on aggressive race position, but it's still speed orientated.

How was the bike in terms of height and reach? How did it compare to other bikes of the same stated size?

It's a little taller at the front end than a traditional low and stretched road bike.

Riding the bike

Was the bike comfortable to ride? Tell us how you felt about the ride quality.

I found it comfortable both in terms of ride position and ride quality. It's certainly a long way from being a bone shaker.

Did the bike feel stiff in the right places? Did any part of the bike feel too stiff or too flexible?

It's not mega-stiff but it's not too flexy either.

Which components had the most effect (good or bad) on the bike's comfort? would you recommend any changes?

I found the saddle a touch too squidgy for my taste, but I'd rather that than too firm.

In all of these marks, I'm comparing the bike to similarly priced alternatives.

The drivetrain

Wheels and tyres, your summary.

Did you enjoy riding the bike? Yes.

Would you consider buying the bike? It would certainly be on my shortlist if I was after a bike at about this price.

Would you recommend the bike to a friend? I'd recommend it should be on their shortlist too.

Anything further to say about the bike in conclusion?

Nearly all big brand bikes at this price have these features: aluminium frame, fork with carbon legs and alloy steerer, an incomplete Shimano Sora groupset (chainset and brakes being the most frequent omissions), in-house aluminium handlebar, stem and seatpost. If you simply compare spec lists, you'll see that the 1.2 comes out better than some and not quite as well as others.

However, we'd caution against making a decision based solely on a comparison of spec sheets. We've not reviewed all of the 1.2's chief rivals, but we can tell you that this bike will provide you with a very good all-round performance, the brakes being the only real low point.

Overall rating: 8 /10

About the tester

Age: 43   Height: 190cm   Weight: 75kg

I usually ride:    My best bike is:

I've been riding for: Over 20 years   I ride: Most days   I would class myself as: Expert

I regularly do the following types of riding: commuting, club rides, sportives, general fitness riding,

Help us to fund our site

We’ve noticed you’re using an ad blocker. If you like road.cc, but you don’t like ads, please consider subscribing to the site to support us directly. As a subscriber you can read road.cc ad-free, from as little as £1.99. 

If you don’t want to subscribe, please turn your ad blocker off. The revenue from adverts helps to fund our site.

Help us to bring you the best cycling content

If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £1.99. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.

Mat has been in cycling media since 1996, on titles including BikeRadar, Total Bike, Total Mountain Bike, What Mountain Bike and Mountain Biking UK, and he has been editor of 220 Triathlon and Cycling Plus. Mat has been road.cc technical editor for over a decade, testing bikes, fettling the latest kit, and trying out the most up-to-the-minute clothing. We send him off around the world to get all the news from launches and shows too. He has won his category in Ironman UK 70.3 and finished on the podium in both marathons he has run. Mat is a Cambridge graduate who did a post-grad in magazine journalism, and he is a winner of the Cycling Media Award for Specialist Online Writer. Now over 50, he's riding road and gravel bikes most days for fun and fitness rather than training for competitions.

Add new comment

13 comments.

I'm riding this bike now for over 6 years. Inexpensive when bought for  €600. Needed maintenance about 2 years ago which was about €400 (new wheelset, cassette/chain/cabling etc). I've replaced the 700x23-tyres by 700x25-tyres a long time ago without changing anything else. Works like a charm.

Great value for the money but brakes could indeed be better. Meanwhile looking to add a new bike (and use this one solely on the Tacx) with disc-brakes.

• Log in or register to post comments

The current Trek 1 Series bikes have plenty of clearance for fixed mudguards, even with a 25mm tyre. The 2013 1.2 had little clearance, and this was because Trek used the 2 series frame for that particular year. I'm guessing evo_playa has one of these. Agree that SKS Raceblade Long guards are great. The lack of availability is due to a redesign - SKS are developing the new version to allow for bikes with disc brakes. I gather they won't be available until this autumn at the earliest. UK distributors sold out of the old versions months ago.

Seems like a comparable spec and set up to other value bikes. Agree that even low spec bikes are good and has recently made me question my prior choice of 105 or nothing. Anyone know if Claris is any good ? Always found the Trek styling a bit bland but this one looks ok. The latest B twin road bikes seem anazing value if your in the market for a new bike. www.tinpony.co.uk/shop

Tin Pony wrote: Seems like a comparable spec and set up to other value bikes. Agree that even low spec bikes are good and has recently made me question my prior choice of 105 or nothing. Anyone know if Claris is any good ? Always found the Trek styling a bit bland but this one looks ok. The latest B twin road bikes seem anazing value if your in the market for a new bike. www.tinpony.co.uk/shop

The 8 speed Sora front and rear Derailleurs on my Trek are long since worn out and were replaced with Claris just before the winter kicked in. It works really smooth with no problems - even on the old Sora shifters with thumb button.

I've had the 2011 1.1 with shimano 2300 (remember that?) for just over 4 years now, and it certainly scrubs up well. Even with just 2300 and a different wheelset I've raced on it for a couple of years to some success, it certainly doesn't feel like it holds me back, which is very impressive for such a cheap machine. In fact, I like it enough to complete the change to 5700 groupset in the spring.

I can't say I ever had a problem with the brake calipers, and I can't tell the difference between the alloy calipers and the Shimano long drop calipers having swapped them out- they are certainly good enough.

However, I'm not a fan of the H2 fit with the massive head tube- I hate long head tubes and was lucky to get mine before they were introduced.

Excellent winter trainer and commuter. My 2007 Trek 1.2 is still going strong - it's had a few minor changes but still has the Sora 8 speed with thumb button - oh and a pannier rack!

It's still a lovely bike to ride and recommended first road bike.

Not a racing bike. Sit up and beg.

WHY wouldn't they put sensible 25mm tyres on the bike?

Mike T. wrote: WHY wouldn't they put sensible 25mm tyres on the bike?

Quite. I can't really understand why they'd have clearances so tight, seems unecessary. It may be that 25mm tyres would work with some mudguards already mentioned, but probably not full guards that also help keep crud off the chainset especially in winter.

Word of warning though, if it is like my Trek 1.2 with the carbon fork you will be lucky to get a fixed mudguard that fits even though the bike has mudguard eyelets.

Clearance on the front is not good and i had to end up using Crud mudguards for the front wheel.

craigr wrote: Word of warning though, if it is like my Trek 1.2 with the carbon fork you will be lucky to get a fixed mudguard that fits even though the bike has mudguard eyelets. Clearance on the front is not good and i had to end up using Crud mudguards for the front wheel.

As ever, SKS Raceblade Longs. Sorted.

KiwiMike wrote: craigr wrote: Word of warning though, if it is like my Trek 1.2 with the carbon fork you will be lucky to get a fixed mudguard that fits even though the bike has mudguard eyelets. Clearance on the front is not good and i had to end up using Crud mudguards for the front wheel.

Tried quite a few including SKS chromeplastic ones.

edit: tracked them down, looks like instock here : http://www.tredz.co.uk/.SKS-Race-Blade-Long-Mudguard-Set_51833.htm

Fairly simple and inexpensive to swap out the substandard brake calipers.

I upgraded my Trek 1.1 to Shimano non series long drop brake calipers and the difference in braking was amazing.

Latest Comments

Dr Dan ? nothing, Main Road in Kesgrave is just as bad as anything Woodbridge chucks at you to cycle on, imo its actually worse, but people always...

If you cycled regularly you would know that it isn't a small number of drivers that are bad, its just a small number that get caught.

Design and concept is great, build quality and customer service are not quite up to the same level.  Unfortunately for an expensive item they don't...

How long until she claims her account was hacked?

Anyone got a map / view of what's actually being proposed (or indeed opposed)?  The formal planning application seems to be here but ICBA to wade...

While Polis Scotland can come across as being inept and clueless regarding road crime I think they're stuck between a rock and a hard place due to...

Great win from Welshman Stephen Williams!

I haven't seen the report to which you refer but looking at the graph that you shared there it appears only to have looked at speed versus the...

Another utterly pathetic sentence...

Ah, well, without prejudice to my above defence, I would say that on the balance of probabilities the mudguards are SKS Longboards, fitted at a...

Related Reviews

Boardman SLR 8.6

Comfortable, lively ride, an excellent gear range and well-chosen components – one of the best entry-level bikes you can buy

Fara F/Road

Quick, nimble, fun, an impressive ride quality and excellent comfort – and I think it looks stunning

Factor O2 VAM

A master of climbing – but a bike that's also incredible fun and extremely capable everywhere else

Orro Venturi STC SRAM Force eTap Tailor Made 2024

Real world aerodynamics and well-designed geometry create an excellent bike that is fast and easy to ride

• ALL (67 Forums)
• WHEELS & TIRES
• SPECIALIZED
• CYCLOCROSS BIKES
• TIRES & WHEELS

Trek 1.2 WSD Road Bike

Trek's 1.2 Triple WSD is a shining example of trickle-down technology. The heart and soul of this speed demon is Trek's Alpha White aluminum frame and the Bontrager carbon fork, an impressive combination shared with much more expensive machines. Add the Shimano 24-speed drivetrain, powerful dual-pivot brakes and select Bontrager parts and you have an amazing road rig ready to take you everywhere you want to go, from touring the countryside to cruising local loops for fitness.

• USER REVIEWS

For being my first road bike or any real bike, this bike is great. I tested a flat bar hybrid and this one and loved this one. It was much faster. I know that the parts are not top of the line but they work great for my kind of riding. I can't wait to get back on the bike after each ride. Perfect for me!

Get the latest road bike reviews, news, race results, and much more by signing up for the Roadbikereview Newsletter

Hot Deals See All Hot Deals >>

Get the latest roadbike reviews, news, race results, and much more by signing up for the Roadbikereview Newsletter

• EDITORIAL REVIEWS
• CLASSIFIEDS

ABOUT ROADBIKEREVIEW

• TERMS OF USE
• PRIVACY POLICY
• ADVERTISING

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2024 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.

• MAGAZINE OFFERS
• BIKE INSURANCE
• Best Products
• Maintenance
• Accessories
• Long-Term Reviews
• BikeRadar Podcast
• First Look Friday
• Bike of the Week
• Tech Features
• Routes and Rides
• Bike Galleries
• BikeRadar Bargains
• Buyer's Guides
• Fitness & Training
• Sizing & Fit
• Mountain Biking UK
• Cycling Plus

Trek 1.2 review

A very stable bike that would be great for a cautious new rider

bikeradar us

For a new rider who is unsure about a road bike’s handling, the Trek 1.2 could be a great solution, as its slow steering makes it stable at slow speeds.

Ride and handling: Cushioning and stable

All our testers commented on how well the Trek 1.2 rode in terms of comfort and stability.

While not super stiff or quick to turn (attributes a racer might look for), the Trek 1.2 was easy to steer at slow speeds, and felt comfortable and stable riding over rough pavement and on choppy dirt roads.

Frame: Neutral frame with extra-stable fork

Two things set the Trek apart from the other seven bikes in our “Best Road Bikes Under $1,000” test. One, the bike has the slowest steering of the bunch, more akin to an easy-riding cruiser that a twitchy track bike. And two, the Trek comes in more sizes than any in our test: an 8-size array runs from a tiny 43cm to a towering 62cm.

Equipment: A beginner-friendly arrangement

As with all the bikes in the “Best Road Bikes Under $1,000” test, the F85 features a compact 50/34 crank (a standard crank has bigger 53/39 chain rings). The cassette is 11-28.

Chain rings and cassette cogs have an inverse relationship: bigger chain rings mean more gear, more speed and more effort, while bigger cassette cogs mean a smaller gear, less speed but less effort – especially when going uphill.

Bottom line: the Trek 1.2 can get you up and down mountains without blowing out your knees or your lungs.

The wheels, tires and saddle are from Trek’s Bontrager house brand. They are all of good quality.

Share this article

• Terms & Conditions
• Subscribe to our magazines
• Manage preferences

• Trek 1.2 WSD 2010

Bike summary

Bike components.

Alpha White Aluminum

Suspension Fork

Bontrager Approved, carbon

Rear Derailleur

Shimano Tiagra

Front Derailleur

Shimano Sora

Shift Levers

Shimano Sora STI, 9 speed

SRAM PG-950 11-26, 9 speed

FSA Vero 50/39/30

Nylon body w/alloy cage

Alloy hubs; Bontrager Approved alloy rims

Bontrager Race AW, 700x23c

Alloy dual pivot w/Shimano Sora STI levers

Bontrager SSR, 10 degree, 31.8mm

Bontrager VR WSD, 31.8mm

Aheadset Slimstak w/semi-cartridge bearings, sealed

Bontrager R1 WSD

Bontrager Alloy, infinite tilt adjustment

Bike geometry

About this model.

1.2 WSD completes the Trek 12 model. Trek launched 16 bikes of this model so far. You can get a glimpse at all models from 2010 , by clicking on this link .

When cycling always take safety very seriously. Wear a helmet, obey the traffic rules and wear hi-vis clothes. In short, take care of yourself so others can take care of you.

Average price for Race bikes

If you want to purchase a solid Race bike, it is important to know that the average cost is 3350 $ . However, paying less money than this amount doesn’t mean that you couldn’t get a great Race bike. In short, before purchasing your ideal bike do some research about its components, and also check for reviews online.

1.2 WSD components

Fork material.

The fork is made out of carbon, so, it’s a great addition to the bike’s value. However, carbon forks should be regularly inspected for damage because even the smallest crack could cause the fork to fall apart.

Wheels size

When leaving the production line, the 1.2 WSD model has 700c aluminum wheels. These wheels are the most used kind for road bikes in general. However, while they give you great speed and control, these wheels are not so bump-friendly.

Nothing is more important on a bike than its ability to brake properly. Trek 1.2 WSD is equipped with Rim brakes. Rim brakes are cheaper than hydraulic brakes, and also easier to maintain. However, they have problems in wet conditions.

Trek 12 models from 2017

Trek 12 models from 2016, trek 12 models from 2015, trek 12 models from 2014, trek 12 models from 2013, trek 12 models from 2012, trek 12 models from 2011, trek 12 models from 2010, trek 12 models from 2009, trek 12 models from 2008.

Not sure what's your riding style?

Find your ideal bike in seconds!

Take our 30 seconds quizz and find out which bikes suit you the best.

Handy tools

Tools to help you even more.

WOMEN'S APPAREL

Discover apparel for every season

• filter controls Items 24 24 48 72 filter controls Sort by Featured Featured A-Z Z-A Price Low-High Price High-Low

NEED HELP CHOOSING?

Use the Bike Finder to narrow your choices, compare models, and find the Trek that’s right for you.

Get started

• Forum Listing
• Marketplace
• Advanced Search
• Classic Forums
• Bikes, Frames and Forks

2010 Trek 2.1 WSD

• Add to quote

New to cycling and thinking about purchasing 2010 Trek 2.1 WSD. Anybody have any experience with this bike? Also my dealer is only showing it available in 1 color scheme. I know probably not important in the grand scheme of things, but wondering if anybody knows if it is offered in another color? The Trek website only showing 2009 models. Thanks in advance!  

cmmeyer1132 said: New to cycling and thinking about purchasing 2010 Trek 2.1 WSD. Anybody have any experience with this bike? Also my dealer is only showing it available in 1 color scheme. I know probably not important in the grand scheme of things, but wondering if anybody knows if it is offered in another color? The Trek website only showing 2009 models. Thanks in advance! Click to expand...

Thank you so much! My husband just bought the 2010 Trek 2.1 with the upgraded components and loves it. I am of course completely jealous! We are both new to cycling, having only ridden cruisers in the past. I was absolutely blown away in the difference in speed/effort with a road bike.  

teoteoteo said: Bike is only offered in one color. Pearl White with yellow and grey decal. Click to expand...

I have a NIB 2009 model as my back-up bike. I'm upgrading to 105 components. Then it will be equivalent to the Trek 2.3. It is a great bike.  

• ?            
• 205.2K members

Top Contributors this Month

• Private Messages and Notices 0
• Forum Msgs to Me 0
• Browse Forums
• Browse Members
• Create a Forum

• My Profile Photo
• My Preferences

The world in a Sand Grain

Hosted by Sand_Grain

Current debate about contemporary life, ancient historical issues, and just about everything in between in different languages

• 1120 MEMBERS
• 43891 MESSAGES
• 0 POSTS TODAY

Discussions

•  7 Days back
•  2 Days back
•  Today
•  Unread Msgs
•  Unread to Me
•  High Interest
•  Unread/High
•  Recently Seen
•  Ignored
•  Attachments
•   Bookmarked Msgs

History and Archaeology

2180 messages in 133 discussions;

On This Day May 26, 2010

Latest 13/6/20 by funiki

Health and Science

3174 messages in 133 discussions;

Doctors Don’t Know About Nutrition (video)

Latest 16/6/23 by Bab6s

On This Day May 26, 2010    History and Archaeology

From: Berylline

Yekaterina Danilova said:

The bomb was detonated by remote control and used about 200 grams (7 ounces) of explosives. The device was packed with small metal objects meant to inflict maximum harm.

On This Day May 26, 2010:

Stavropol, Russia Islamic militants bomb a concert hall

Death toll rises to 7 in Russia bombing

CNN) -- The death toll rose to seven Thursday from a bombing outside a planned performance by a dance company in Russia, officials said.

About forty people were injured in the Wednesday bombing. The bomb went off outside a community center in the southwestern Russian city of Stavropol, according to the Investigation Committee of the Russian Prosecutor's Office, which called the explosion "an act of terror."

The blast happened about 6.45 p.m. (10:45 a.m. ET), 15 minutes before the Chechen dance company Vainakh was scheduled to perform, the committee said.

One of the dead included a pre-teen girl, according to state-run news agency RIA-Novosti.

By the CNN Wire Staff May 27, 2010 4:34 a.m. EDT http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/europe/05/27/russia.explosion.death.toll/index.html?eref=ib_topstories

• Edited 26 May 2020 19:46  by   Berylline

From: funiki

• Message Actions

Share a link to message

Share a link to.

• Sport Betting
• Yearly calendar
• Latest results
• English Español French Italiano Nederlands

TheSports.org

  All sports Site

Handball - Stavropol SKFU (Women)

Stavropol Skfu is a handball team from Russia, based in Stavropol. The club is playing for the season 2023/2024 in the Russia First League Women - Super League.

Stavropol SKFU - Results

2023/2024 2022/2023 2021/2022 2020/2021 2019/2020 2018/2019 2017/2018 2016/2017 2015/2016 2014/2015

Russia First League Women - Super League - Relegation - 2023/2024

Russia first league women - super league - regular season - 2023/2024, stavropol skfu - identity.

• Official name : Stavropol Skfu
• Country : Russia
• Location : Stavropol
• Official website : http://stavplus.ru/gandbol.html
• Manager : Volynchenko Vitaly Vladimirovich
• Postal Address : Stavropol, St. Pirogov, 70, 46 k.

Stavropol SKFU - Titles, trophies and places of honor

• Best result : Place 5 in 2017/2018

Postal Address

• Krasnoyarsk
• Saint Petersburg
• Karachayevo-Cherkesiya
• Ingushetiya
• Khanty-Mansi
• Zabaykal'skiy
• Kaliningrad
• Compare Climate
• Climate Charts
• All Countries
• British Virgin Islands
• Netherlands
• New Zealand
• Philippines
• Puerto Rico
• Saudi Arabia
• South Africa
• Switzerland
• United Arab Emirates
• United Kingdom
• United States
• Imperial (°F, mph, in)
• Metric (°C, km/h, mm)

Stavropol', Russia Climate

Weather: 20°C/68.0°F, Wind SW at 3 km/h, 43% Humidity, 0% Chance of rain

• Monthly Averages

Climate Graph

Stavropol' temperature by month, historical data.

• Nearby Locations

Stavropol' Climate Summary

Located at an elevation of 599.11 meters (1965.58 feet) above sea level, Stavropol' has a Humid subtropical, no dry season climate (Classification: Cfa). The city’s yearly temperature is 11.55ºC (52.79ºF) and it is 6.28% higher than Russia’s averages. Stavropol' typically receives about 109.21 millimeters (4.3 inches) of precipitation and has 146.63 rainy days (40.17% of the time) annually.

Climate Stavropol': Monthly Averages

The chart below shows the mean monthly temperature and precipitation of Stavropol' in recent years.

Daily Observations

Stavropol' 10 year historical weather data.

• Stavropol' weather in April 2010
• Stavropol' weather in April 2011
• Stavropol' weather in April 2012
• Stavropol' weather in April 2013
• Stavropol' weather in April 2014
• Stavropol' weather in April 2015
• Stavropol' weather in April 2017
• Stavropol' weather in April 2018
• Stavropol' weather in April 2019
• Stavropol' weather in April 2020

Nearby locations

• Abram-Tyubye 0.00 km ( 0.00 mi)
• Chyernolyesskoye 0.00 km ( 0.00 mi)
• Kamyennobrodskaya 0.00 km ( 0.00 mi)
• Byeshpagir 0.00 km ( 0.00 mi)
• Kuchyerla 0.00 km ( 0.00 mi)
• Khyersonskiy 0.00 km ( 0.00 mi)
• Kyevsala 2.71 km ( 1.69 mi)
• Nadzornoye 28.83 km ( 17.92 mi)
• Kochubyeyevskoye 41.09 km ( 25.53 mi)
• Nyevinnomyssk 44.12 km ( 27.41 mi)
• Donskoye 46.72 km ( 29.03 mi)
• Kugul'ta 49.28 km ( 30.62 mi)
• Khar'kovskiy 57.04 km ( 35.44 mi)
• Konstantinovskoye 60.70 km ( 37.72 mi)
• Martynovka 75.14 km ( 46.69 mi)
• Kursavka 77.25 km ( 48.00 mi)
• Ladovskaya Balka 78.80 km ( 48.97 mi)
• Grushyevskoye 85.93 km ( 53.40 mi)
• Kambulat 94.66 km ( 58.82 mi)
• Alyeksandriya 101.27 km ( 62.93 mi)
• Novokavkazskiy 105.03 km ( 65.27 mi)
• Ipatovo 106.44 km ( 66.14 mi)
• Byekyeshyevskaya 109.20 km ( 67.86 mi)
• Kazgulak 112.06 km ( 69.63 mi)
• Bol'shaya Dzhalga 118.80 km ( 73.82 mi)
• Kulikovy Kopani 129.47 km ( 80.45 mi)
• Yessyentuki 131.25 km ( 81.56 mi)
• Mirnyy 134.09 km ( 83.32 mi)
• Goryachyevodskiy 144.14 km ( 89.56 mi)
• Manychskoye 144.42 km ( 89.74 mi)
• Apanasyenkovskoye 148.29 km ( 92.14 mi)
• Krasnyy Manych 163.53 km ( 101.61 mi)
• Arzgir 181.91 km ( 113.03 mi)
• Glubokiy 185.67 km ( 115.37 mi)
• Nikol'skoye 195.76 km ( 121.64 mi)
• Novkus-Artyezian 232.84 km ( 144.68 mi)
• Edissiya 233.68 km ( 145.20 mi)
• Dyerbyetovka 9,349.69 km ( 5,809.62 mi)
• Iskra 10,047.47 km ( 6,243.20 mi)

Comments (0)

• Latest first
• Highest rated

• Rider Notes

2009 Trek 1.2

An aluminum frame race bike with mid-range components and rim brakes. Compare the full range

For This Bike

View more similar bikes →

A bike with lower gearing will be easier to ride up steep hills, while a higher top end means it will pedal faster down hills.

Similar Bikes

(descending)

Add custom gearing

Last updated June 29 Not listed for 2,480 days