trek competitors

Trek vs. Giant Bikes | The Ultimate Comparison Guide

Trek vs. Giant is a great bike rivalry that has benefited everyone who loves bikes. If you need to decide between the two, you will have to compare the components of their respective road bikes, gravel bikes, and e-bikes. Warranty and customer service also need to be discussed. Let’s do this.

When compared to each other, Trek vs. Giant bikes results in a pretty close race. Giant is generally cheaper with more high-quality components on their bikes, whereas Trek tends to be more innovative in its designs. Both brands deliver high-quality bikes in different categories.

It could be a difficult choice when you are in the bike shop, and you need to choose between a Trek or a Giant model. As I will explain in the article, Giant is generally cheaper, but if you’re looking for a high-performance bike, then Trek leads the way. Choosing one over the other is a win-win situation, as both brands are fantastic.

Trek vs. Giant: Product Range

Trek vs. giant: design, trek vs. giant: innovations, trek vs. giant: overall price, trek vs. giant: frame material, trek vs. giant: suspension and gears, trek vs. giant: brakes, trek vs. giant: pro-cycling wins, trek vs. giant road bikes: performance, trek vs. giant: e-bikes, trek vs. giant: gravel bikes, trek vs. giant mtb: performance, trek vs. giant: what their warranties cover, trek vs. giant: what their warranties don’t cover, trek vs. giant: customer service, trek vs. giant bikes: comparison.

Giant is the world’s largest manufacturer of bicycles, and Trek is the leader, most popular, and respected bike brand in the American market. Both of these bike manufacturers offer models in most categories, price points, catering for all types of cyclists.

When comparing Trek vs. Giant bikes, it’s like comparing Chevrolet and Ford vehicles. Both are hugely respected and liked brands, with solid reputations to boot. Ask a thousand people to choose between the brands, and it may be split down the middle of a clear win for one. 

Ask another thousand people, and the results could be different. I’m trying to get across that both brands are very well supported. There are some minor differences between the brands that can help you decide whether you want a Trek or a Giant bike.

As mentioned earlier in the article, Trek is the leader in the American market. They have the broadest range of bicycle options; whether you are looking for an entry-level bike or a high-performance bike used by professionals, Trek has you covered.

Giant also boasts an impressive selection of anything bike; however, they lack behind Trek in their product range. An interesting fact about Giant is that in some cases, they can manufacture bikes designed by competitor brands, as their team has excellent bike manufacturing facilities across the world.

Trek road bike designs are flashy and cutting edge, geared towards research and development, focused on making their bikes look and feel better when on the saddle. More people tend to go for a Trek Road bike when money isn’t a problem. 

Giant road bike designs are less flashy and more geared to adding quality parts to the design than turning heads on the road. Giant tend to merge the practicality of their bikes’ with added performance by going with their general design, whereas Trek’s models seem to be more streamlined every year.

Both brands have played an instrumental role in incorporating innovative ideas in bike manufacturing, changing the way we build and ride bikes.

Trek Innovations

Here are some of the revolutionary technologies developed by Trek over the years:

• OCLV Carbon
• Alpha Aluminum
• Active Braking Pivot 
• Full Floater
• Trek IsoSpeed 

Giant Innovations

Here are some of the innovative technologies developed by our friends at Giant:

• Compact Road Design 
• OverDrive 
• Comax Composite Technology  
• Maestro Suspension
• Dfuse Technology 

Both of these manufacturers have played a massive part in the evolution of the bicycle, and long may it continue.  

Today, both brands are still at the forefront of innovative designs, revolutionary accessories, and yearly improvements on the bikes we have grown to love. Deciding who gets your money may rest on what technologies are present in the model you’re looking at. 

Trek has proved its worth regarding the production of award-winning reliable racing bikes, where Giant is all about the comfort of the ride and producing affordable quality bikes for everyone.

Trek bikes are generally more expensive than Giant. The main reason for this is that Trek bikes are manufactured in the United States, where the components cost more than in Taiwan, where the components cost less.

Giant bikes are less expensive than Trek bikes, mainly because they are manufactured in Taiwan. The island contains a closely interweaved supply chain incorporated with mature manufacturing technology. 

The parts are cheaper, allowing Giant to add extra accessories within a reasonable price frame.

Everything is closely situated, from the suppliers to the OEM companies, this results in lead times in materials, manufacturing, and design being shortened. Giant differentiates itself from competitors that, from ideation to raw materials to the finished product, is all controlled in-house (whole process.)

Giant produces bikes almost half the time it would take in the United States and brings them to the market at a much lower cost . Lower cost, in this case, does not mean lower quality, as Giant prides itself on delivering quality products to the market at the best possible price.

With any product, the more expensive ones tend to be the best manufactured, best-performing ones. These bike brands offer some more affordable bikes and some pretty expensive ones.

Trek Road Bikes have been referred to as indestructible, and if you have ever owned one, this will make perfect sense to you. They use only the strongest OCLV Carbon fiber in constructing their road bikes.

Some of Trek’s models are made from Alpha Aluminium, and through the process of Hydro Foaming, creates a frame that’s not as stiff as aluminum frames of old, giving the frame:

• Reduced Weight
• Reduced Stiffness (in critical areas that produce a harsh ride quality)

Some of their frames are tested in wind tunnels to help with optimum aerodynamics, and they love to produce a stiff, typically rugged frame compared to that of the opposition.

When engineering quality carbon, it’s crucial to minimize voids – spaces between the layers of carbon that can compromise the frame’s durability and strength. Trek’s OCLV Carbon exceeds aerospace standards; your bike frame will literally survive when launched into space!

Giant Bike Frames are made from an Advanced Grade Composite (Raw carbon), which features an excellent stiffness-to-weight ratio, that is both light and highly durable.

For some models, they employ what they call Modified Monocoque Construction , where the front triangle is molded and assembled as one piece without reducing:

• The quality of the ride
• Strength of the frame
• Stiffness of the frame

Giant also produces frames from aluminum alloy, which is light in weight yet durable. However, these frames may need regular servicing to keep them in perfect condition and avoid rusting. 

One thing to remember is that Giant started as an OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer), making frames for their bikes, even some bikes for their competitors like Trek were their thing.

If your main aim is to enjoy the act of cycling, then a cheaper aluminum frame could work for you. If you aim to be super-competitive and train to win, you should spend your money on a carbon fiber frame.

Trek is a master when it comes to suspensions . Trek fits their models with the following suspension systems, each one playing a significant part in one of the essential areas of any bike, the suspension:

• Full Floater – This allows for an extraordinarily responsive and nimble suspension that gives you the feeling of bottomless travel.
• IsoSpeed – This road bike suspension system decouples the seat tube from the top tube, decreasing driver fatigue.
• RE:aktiv – This suspension system adapts to the terrain with affective dampening and low shaft velocity. 

Giant’s suspension systems are also top-notch and are of high-technological quality:

• Maestro Full Suspension – This suspension system is used on their mountain bikes; it utilizes four tactically placed pivot points connected to two linkages, creating a single floating point that minimizes suspension compression. 
• Flexpoint Suspension – A suspension system that offers the same benefits as a multi-link system without the added cost/need for regular maintenance.

In some of their higher-priced models, both Trek and Giant use SRAM RED eTap AXS Groupset, expect Shimano kits on the mid-range models. Trek uses higher gear ratios in their bikes, whereas Giant prefers to go with lower gear ratios in similar models.

Trek revolutionized the biking industry by releasing their patented  Active Braking Pivot or ABP system. Manufacturers struggled for years with breaks and the suspension system, as braking would lock up the suspension.

That was until Trek unleashed the ABP, which allowed the suspension system to function at its best while braking, resulting in:

• Less Unintentional Skidding
• Less Chatter
• Driver Confidence (On or off the brakes)

Trek and Giant Road bikes use hydraulic disc brakes on their road bikes , although you might find rim brakes on some older or specific models. Hydraulic disc brakes are a way more effective braking system and hardly get damaged when put to the test.

Both have a wide range of brakes that they use on different types of bikes, but it’s usually hydraulic for road bikes, which is considered the most efficient braking system available. 

If you are into competitive racing, you probably have a hero that you follow religiously. When looking at some pro-cycling wins for each of the respective brands, it looks like Trek nails it with regards to producing high-performance bikes in the pro-cycling circuit!

Trek vs. Giant Bikes: Road Bike 

When comparing two brands, it’s best to compare their top-of-the-range models with each other. Have you heard the saying that goes that you are only as good as your last bike?

When you compare Trek’s Émonda SLR 9 eTap vs. Giant’s Propel Advanced Pro Disc 1, the slight differences are usually found in the different technologies used by the specific manufacturer, a different part here or there, both bikes are of high-quality and worth the price.

Trek’s Émonda SLR 9 eTap won the Best Road Bike of The Year award, which comes as no surprise to Trek lovers.

Trek bikes are ideal for the serious, heavy-duty racer and heavier than the average rider. Trek is known for its superior rear suspension, making mincemeat any terrain without feeling bumps or ruts. 

When used in urban areas, giant road bikes are typically more geared for the average rider. Giant likes to give the user a very comfortable ride compared to a Trek bike where performance is everything, and people sometimes refer to Giant bikes as “souped-up” tourist bikes.

That being said, Giant is no slouch when it comes to producing high-end road bikes. They have been doing it for many years, maybe just not as regularly as Trek does.

Some manufacturers design e-bikes that use a twist throttle to engage the electronic drive system, where you are not required to pedal for the motor to engage, but not Trek or Giant. They only produce pedal-assist e-bikes that deliver power according to driver input.

You will notice that Trek has a wider variety of e-bikes models under each respective category, compared to Giant, servicing a larger consumer base:

• Verve+  
• Allant+ 
• Vale Go!  
• Powerfly Electric Mountain Bikes 
• Powerfly Equipped Electric Mountain Bikes 
• E-Caliber 
• Domane+ HP 
• Domane+ ALR
• Townie Go!  
• Townie Path Go!
• Attitude Go!

Giant’s e-bike range is also one of great variety, matching client expectations regarding options. The difference is the number of models under each category of e-bike (:

• FastRoad E+ EX (2022)
• Revolt E+ (2022) 
• Roam E+ 
• Trance X Advanced E+ 
• FastRoad E+ EX Pro
• Talon E+ 29 3 
• Trance X E+ Pro 29
• Revolt E+ Pro 28mph
• Stance E+ 
• Explore E+ 

There is little that separates both brands regarding their respective e-bike line of models . Your decision may rest on the price and functionality of the bike also what technology is used in the design.

Giant recently released a model – Reign E+ 0 (2022) that features a 750Wh battery – whereas, until last year, the most powerful battery used was 650Wh by both Trek and Giant.

They both produce bikes in the following categories:

The guys at Bicycling.com and Outsideline.com   concluded that Trek’s E-Caliber 9.9 XTR won the e-mountain bike of the year award in 2021. Another feather in Trek’s hat, a full hat, I might add.

Gravel bikes are designed to perform on gravel paths and tarmac, a bit of a choose-your-own-adventure bike. 

Trek again has a broader range of models for gravel bikes, and their new model Checkpoint SLR 9 eTap has taken the gravel bike scene by storm. 

Giant’s Revolt Advanced Pro (2022) is a cheaper option, with less technology involved, but still a fantastic ride. 

When you can’t afford the top-of-the-range models, you will always find a model from either company that gives you value for money . Finding the right bike for you is all about personal riding preference, your budget, and what you expect to get out of the bike.

Giant VS Trek Mountain Bikes

Both are major mountain bike brands and leaders in the industry, for the right price you get an awesome bike. Some Trek MTB frames are in fact from Giant! Both make great bikes and crappy bikes depending on the price range, anything over $800 is often far superior to a $600-$700 bike.

If you’re a very fast rider or rather heavy don’t get a Giant. Giant’s MTB  suspension have long and flexible lower link which is less comfortable at high speeds and heavy riders might consider it a bit too flexible. Your weight might compress the suspension too much wasting energy and performance.

Only just a couple of years ago Trek had better geometry and suspension design but nowadays there’s hardly any noticeable difference. The most important part is the frame, both offer great frames but with a few small differences . Most of the components come from Shimano or SRAM.

Giant offers the best bang for your buck, they recently even cut prices where Trek did the opposite. From a value proposition, Trek is less attractive , with the recent difference in prices, this is where Giant stands out. Unless you’re able to get a discount on a Trek,  budget-wise Giant is the better choice.

Giant is the largest manufacturer in the world and makes bikes for every brand, their frames are top quality and even Trek sometimes has Giant frames (check the photos from the Giant bike factory in Taiwan). 

Other people report that they find Giant’s frames not stiff enough, but it depends on what you like best and it’s less relevant when it comes to mountain biking. If you’re not the racing type or break bikes occasionally, get a Giant.

Others find Giant’s frame angles less progressive compared to Trek .  When it comes to hydraforming (a process using fluid and high pressure to shape the tube), Trek is doing trickier stuff to gain strength and stiffness.

Most of the time Trek does a better job optimizing frames when it comes to the strength-to-weight . In doubt and if you feel they are equal, check which of them offers the best warranty.

Both perform excellent depending on the bike and your personal preference or body type. Heavyweights and racers will often be better off with a Trek because of the differences in suspension.

Trek is often considered like a plow bike and Giant is more playful , this also depends on how you set up your bike. The more you pay the better the performance and this goes for every reputable brand.

A $500 mountain bike performs a lot worse compared to a higher-end $1500 bike. You get what you pay for and sometimes saving a little bit more is really worth it if you’re looking at a lower range bike. I’d stay away from the cheaper models if you can unless you only plan to use it on roads and pavements.

Here’s a big difference, you often get better quality components when you buy a Giant MTB considering you’re comparing bikes at the same price range. Like mentioned before, Giant can get their parts cheaper because they own many of the factories and buy in bulk.

The components often don’t have anything to do with the brands, they buy them from other manufacturers but the price makes a difference.

Both make great designs and this is really a personal preference. It’s all in the eye of the beholder but often people like Trek designs better . This also might have to do with the brand’s status. Giant is less shiny/flashy, like the Toyota of mountain bikes. They’re reliable, more affordable but not the sexiest.

Giant’s focus is on the quality of the parts and Trek is more into research and development trying to innovate and make better bikes. Suspension layout, for example, is a bit different on Trek bikes.

Trek vs. Giant: Warranty And Customer Service

A warranty is a manufacturer’s guarantee that the product you buy from them is of good quality and doesn’t contain manufacturing defects from their side. 

It gives the consumer (you) the legal right to ask for help from the manufacturer, should any problems arise with their product, according to their terms and conditions.

Both Trek and Giant offer lifetime warranties on their frames and forks, with Trek offering a two-year warranty on:

• Parts 
• Accessories
• Rear Suspension Linkage Components – Rocker link, bearings, accompanying hardware, and components
• Bontrager wheels (with alloy rims)

Trek allows ownership to change from the original owner to a buyer, offering the new owner a warranty on frames and forks. Trek’s Carbon Care Warranty allows customers to get a discount on frame repairs for non-warranty damages.  

Giant’s warranty is for one year on the following and only applies to the original owner of the bike:

• All original components and the paint finish, all Giant repair parts, accessories, and replacement parts are warranted to be free from defects in workmanship and material for one year from the original date of purchase.
• Normal wear and tear
• Improper maintenance
• Improper assembly
• Installation of any components, accessories, and parts not originally intended for or compatible with the bicycle when sold
• Damage or failure due to misuse, accident, abuse, or neglect
• Labor charges for the replacement of parts or changeover
• Non-proprietary products – any other original component or part – covered by the original manufacturer’s warranty

Any modification of the bike’s frame, fork, or any of the components will void the warranty in its entirety. The warranty will be valid from the purchase date and is expressly limited to the replacement or repair of defective items at the manufacturer’s discretion. 

All bikes must be registered when bought by the manufacturers to place the bike under warranty. Spending lots of cash on a bike and not registering it for a warranty is negligent. Please remember to register your new bike immediately.

Both manufacturers offer excellent customer service, as you would expect from industry leaders, such as themselves:

• Customer Service | Trek Bikes  
• Customer Support Contact | Giant Bicycles US

Having the most retail outlets and service centers, Trek might edge Giant in this department regarding faster service delivery.

If you are stuck with a set budget, then Giant may be the bike for you. If your finances allow for it, and you like flashy things, then Trek is the easier choice. High-performance road bikes are Trek’s domain at the moment. A Giant will do just fine for the average rider looking for a comfortable, more playful ride. 

When it comes to Trek vs. Giant, one will always bring out a better model than the other, placing the ball in the other’s court. The thing is that the rival always responds with innovation and upgrades, which is why the bicycling industry is in such a healthy state. 

It all comes down to personal preference, and the whole world can tell you what’s best, but until you get on the saddle of the bike, it’s all just noise. Try both brands at least once, and make your choice from personal experience.

I always had a thing for cycling sports and love almost anything that involves bikes and boards. I work part-time as a designer in the tech industry and work on my blogs whenever I can.

Mongoose VS Trek Bikes (5 Key Differences)

Mongoose and Trek are two of the most popular mountain bike brands on the market. Both offer a wide range of mountain bikes designed for different riding styles and levels of experience.

Mongoose has been a leading name in the bike world for decades, and their bikes are known for being tough, durable, and able to take a beating.

Trek, on the other hand, is a newer name in the bike world, but they have quickly made a name for themselves by making high-quality, lightweight bikes that are perfect for both leisurely rides and competitive racing.

Mongoose VS Trek Bikes

The main difference between Mongoose and Trek bikes is that Mongoose bikes are designed for more aggressive riding, while Trek bikes are more versatile and can be used for both casual and aggressive riding .

Mongoose bikes tend to be heavier and have more suspensions than Trek bikes. Trek bikes also have a higher price tag than Mongoose bikes.

When it comes to mountain bikes, Mongoose is known for its affordable and durable bikes. Mongoose offers a wide range of mountain bikes, from entry-level to high-end, that is designed to tackle any terrain.

Trek, on the other hand, is known for its higher-end mountain bikes that offer more features and better performance. Trek also has a wide range of affordable mountain bikes that are perfect for entry-level riders.

When it comes to quality, both Mongoose and Trek offer high-quality bikes. Trek bikes are generally considered to be better quality than Mongoose bikes. They are also more expensive than Mongoose bikes.

If you’re looking for a bike that’s going to last, then Trek is the better choice. If you’re on a budget, then Mongoose might be a better option.

When it comes to features, both brands offer a wide range of features. Trek bikes tend to have more advanced features than Mongoose bikes. For example, Trek bikes often have better suspension and brakes.

Mongoose Bikes Overview

Mongoose is a bike company that was founded in South Africa in 1974. The company produces mountain, BMX, and freestyle bikes. Mongoose has been owned by Pacific Cycle since 2001.

Mongoose bikes are known for their durability and performance. The company offers a wide range of bikes for both beginner and experienced riders. Mongoose also offers a wide variety of accessories and parts for their bikes.

Mongoose bikes are available at many retailers, both online and in-store. The company also has a website where you can buy bikes and parts directly from Mongoose.

Whether you’re looking for a mountain bike to tackle the trails or a BMX bike to ride at the skate park, Mongoose has a bike that will suit your needs.

So check out Mongoose bikes today and see what all the hype is about!

Trek Bikes Overview

Trek Bikes is a leading manufacturer of bicycles and related products. Based in Wisconsin, USA, Trek Bikes has been in business since 1976 and offers a wide range of products for both recreational and competitive cyclists.

Trek Bikes sponsors some of the world’s top professional cyclists and teams, including Lance Armstrong and the RadioShack-Nissan-Trek team.

Trek Bikes offers a variety of different bicycle models for different riding styles and purposes. Their road bikes are designed for speed and performance, while their mountain bikes are built for durability and off-road riding.

Trek also offers a line of hybrid bikes, which combine features of both road and mountain bikes, as well as a line of electric bikes for those who want a little extra power.

No matter what type of bike you’re looking for, Trek has a model that will suit your needs. And with a wide network of dealers and retailers, it’s easy to find a Trek bike shop near you.

So if you’re in the market for a new bike, be sure to check out Trek Bikes.

Mongoose VS Trek Bikes Suspension

Mongoose bikes are known for their aggressive riding style, and their suspension systems reflect this.

Mongoose bikes typically have shorter travel forks and shocks than Trek bikes, which makes them better suited for downhill and freeride riding.

They also tend to be stiffer overall, which gives them a more responsive feel on the trail. Trek, on the other hand, is more focused on cross-country and trail riding.

Their suspension systems are designed to offer a more versatile ride, with longer travel forks and shocks that can handle a wider range of terrain.

Trek bikes also tend to be more flexible, which makes them easier to control on technical trails.

It depends on your riding style and the type of trails you like to ride. If you’re mostly interested in downhill and freeride riding, then Mongoose is a good choice.

If you want a bike that can handle a wider range of terrain, then Trek is a better option. Whichever brand you choose, make sure to test ride both

Mongoose VS Trek Bikes Frame

There are a few key differences to consider when comparing Mongoose and Trek bike frames. For one, Mongoose bike frames tend to be made from aluminum, while Trek bike frames are typically made from carbon fiber.

This can affect the overall weight and durability of the frame. Additionally, Mongoose bikes often have suspension forks, while Trek bikes typically do not.

This can impact the ride quality and how the bike handles on different terrain. Finally, Mongoose bikes tend to be more affordable than Trek bikes, making them a great option for budget-conscious riders.

When it comes to choosing a bike frame, it’s important to consider your individual needs and riding style. If you’re looking for a durable and lightweight frame, Trek is a great option. If you’re on a budget or you’re looking for a bike with suspension forks, Mongoose is a great choice.

Ultimately, the best bike frame for you is the one that fits your needs and riding style the best.

Mongoose VS Trek Bikes Groupset

Mongoose bikes tend to be more affordable than Trek bikes. This is due in part to the fact that Mongoose outsources some of its manufacturing. Trek, on the other hand, manufactures all of its own products in-house.

This allows them to maintain a higher level of quality control, but it also makes their bikes more expensive.

Mongoose bikes are also known for being more aggressive and trail-oriented than Trek bikes. If you’re looking for a bike to take on serious off-road adventures, Mongoose is probably the better option.

Trek bikes, on the other hand, are more popular for casual riding and commuting.

When it comes down to it, the best bike for you will depend on your specific needs and budget. If you’re looking for a durable, high-quality bike that won’t break the bank, Mongoose is a great option.

If you’re willing to spend a little more for a bike that’s built to last and can handle any terrain, Trek is the way to go.

Mongoose VS Trek Bikes Fork

When it comes to choosing a mountain bike, one of the most important considerations is the frame. There are many different types of mountain bike frames on the market, but two of the most popular brands are Mongoose and Trek.

Both companies make high-quality frames that are designed to perform well in a variety of different conditions. Mongoose frames are typically made from aluminum, which is a lightweight and durable material. Trek frames are usually made from carbon fiber, which is even lighter and more durable.

Both materials have their advantages and disadvantages, so it’s important to decide what’s most important to you in a mountain bike before making a decision.

Another important consideration is the groupset. The groupset is the collection of components that make up the drivetrain of a bike. It includes the chain, cassette, crankset, derailleurs, and shifters.

Mongoose and Trek both offer a variety of different groupsets, so it’s important to compare them side-by-side to see which one is right for you.

Mongoose offers a wide range of mountain bikes, so it’s easy to find one that’s perfect for your needs. Trek also makes a great selection of mountain bikes, but they’re often more expensive than Mongoose bikes.

Ultimately, the decision of which brand to choose is up to you and what you’re looking for in a mountain bike. Consider your budget, riding style , and the features that are most important to you before making a final decision.

Mongoose VS Trek Bikes Wheels And Tires

When it comes to choosing the right bike, there are a lot of factors to consider. But two of the most important things to think about are the wheels and tires.

After all, these are the parts of the bike that actually make contact with the ground. So which is better? Mongoose or Trek?

Mongoose has a reputation for making good-quality bikes. And their wheels and tires are no exception. Their tires are known for being tough and durable, able to handle a lot of abuse. And their wheels are built to be strong and lightweight.

Trek, on the other hand, is known for making high-end bicycles. So it’s no surprise that their wheels and tires are also top-notch. Their tires are designed for speed and traction, while their wheels are built for durability.

Is Mongoose A Good Brand Of Bike?

Mongoose is a good brand of bike. The company has been around for a while and makes quality products. Mongoose bikes are durable and can be ridden on rough terrain. They are also lightweight and easy to maneuver. Mongoose makes bikes for all types of riders, from beginner to professional.

The company has a long history of making quality products that are built to last. Mongoose bikes are perfect for riding on rough terrain and are easy to maneuver.

Whether you’re a beginner or a professional, Mongoose has a bike that’s right for you.

Is Trek Bike A Good Brand?

Trek has been in business since 1976, so they know a thing or two about bikes! Their bikes are designed to be durable and comfortable, so you can ride for miles without having to worry about your bike falling apart.

And if you do have any problems with your Trek bike, their customer service is excellent and they will help you get your bike back in working order as soon as possible.

So if you’re looking for a new bike, I would definitely recommend checking out Trek !

What Are The Top Indirect Competitors For Trek?

Trek is a leading manufacturer of bicycles and related products. While their direct competitors are other brands such as Specialized and Giant , there are many other companies that compete indirectly with Trek.

These indirect competitors include companies that make products that can be used in conjunction with Trek products, or that provide services that Trek does not offer.

Some of the top indirect competitors for Trek include:

• Components manufacturers: companies that make components that can be used on Trek bicycles, such as Shimano and SRAM.
• Bike accessory manufacturers: companies that make accessories for bikes, such as helmets, lights, and racks.
• Clothing manufacturers: companies that make clothing and footwear specifically for cyclists .
• Bike rental companies: companies that rent bikes, such as Trek Tandem.
• Repair and maintenance services: companies that offer repair and maintenance services for bikes.

While Trek does have many indirect competitors, they are still the leading Bicycle Company in the world. This is due to their innovative products, high-quality construction, and excellent customer service.

Trek has built a strong reputation among cyclists, and this has helped them to maintain its position as the top bicycle company.

Are Mongoose Bikes Heavy?

Mongoose bikes are not particularly heavy when compared to other brands on the market . Their average weight is around 27 pounds, which is on par with other popular brands like Trek and Specialized.

However, there are some Mongoose models that are heavier than others.

For example, their downhill mountain bikes can weigh up to 45 pounds. But overall, Mongoose bikes are not excessively heavy and should be able to be handled by most people without much difficulty.

Are Mongoose Bikes Good For Commuting?

Mongoose bikes are a great option for commuting. They’re affordable, reliable, and easy to ride. If you’re looking for a bike that can handle city streets and rough terrain, a Mongoose bike is a good choice.

Mongoose bikes are available in a variety of styles, so you can find one that suits your needs. Mountain bikes, hybrids, and cruisers are all great choices for commuting. If you want a bike that can handle any terrain, a Mongoose mountain bike is a good option. They are also very affordable. If you’re on a budget, you can find a Mongoose bike that fits your needs without breaking the bank.

If you’re looking for a reliable and easy-to-ride bike for commuting , a Mongoose bike is a great choice. With a variety of styles to choose from, you can find the perfect bike for your needs.

And with their affordable price tags, Mongoose bikes are a great value for your money.

Both Mongoose and Trek offer a lot of advantages, but it really depends on what you’re looking for in a bike.

If you’re just getting into cycling and want a bike that’s affordable, Mongoose is a great option. But if you’re looking for a top-of-the-line racing machine, Trek is the way to go. Of course, there are other factors to consider besides price and quality. If you have a local bike shop that you prefer, that may sway your decision.

And if you’re looking for a specific type of bike, like a BMX or kids’ bike , Mongoose may have a better selection.

Ultimately, the best way to decide between Mongoose and Trek is to test ride both brands and see which one feels best to you.

Related Posts:

• Schwinn vs Mongoose (6 Key Differences)
• Kent Vs Mongoose - 4 Key Differences Explained
• Mongoose Dolomite Vs Malus Bikes (7 Helpful Differences)
• Huffy Vs Mongoose Bikes (7 Helpful Differences)
• Mongoose Hitch vs Malus Bikes (7 Helpful Differences)
• Mongoose vs Diamondback Bikes (7 Helpful Differences)

Giant Vs. Trek: Full Bike Comparison With Pros, Cons & More

By Author Anna

Posted on Last updated: April 7, 2023

In a world saturated with choices, separating the wheat from the chaff is difficult, and the sentiment rings ever true for the cycling world. Giant and Trek are bike companies that infiltered every corner of the cycling world, so it’s only natural to want to know which of these two brands is worth your hard-earned money.

The choice depends on user preference, but cyclists agree that Trek:

• follows fewer trends
• focuses on innovation
• is technologically advanced

In contrast, Giant:

• has more options for the price
• has better components
• is best suited for entry-level
• is more affordable

It’s helpful to know precisely how these two titans compare . If you carefully note what each company brings, you’ll realize that there’s something for everyone .

History, Reputation, & Resale Value of Giant Vs. Trek Bikes

Both companies have long and fascinating histories and have built trustworthy reputations globally . They are close matches, and each brand has something unique . The onus is on buyers to know what they want because they’ll likely find it between these two corporations.

Giant Bikes: An Overview

Giant has had an illustrious history, with the company being born in 1972 . From its inception in Taiwan, Giant would start as the Giant Manufacturing Company , producing bikes for top cycling brands worldwide. It wouldn’t be until 1981 that the Giant we know today would emerge.

Giant’s first significant milestone came in 1987 when they stunned the cycling world with the first CADEX carbon fiber road bike . They used computer-aided design and innovative volume production methods to push the needle just a tad forward.

In the following decade, Giant would become a recognized sponsor and again contend for the title of world’s first with the introduction of their Compact Road Frame design.

This design of increased frame rigidity and dialed-in handling would effectively decrease the overall bike weight and would see the company being taken to two Tour de France wins by Joseba Beloki around 1997.

At this stage, Giant began foreshadowing its market dominance and cementing its rapidly growing reputation. In the following years, Giant would continue:

• assert itself in the cycling world
• win awards for innovation

The company would go on to form the offshoot company Liv , which specializes in women-centric bike designs .

Now decades down the line, Giant is considered the largest bicycle company and manufacturer worldwide. Although Giant is widely considered a leading budget bike brand , that doesn’t seem to diminish the company’s glowing reputation.

Giant has an extensive bike range , and most of its longstanding lines regularly drop to a warm market reception. The company may not be the best in all the bike categories but they still give Trek and other competitors stiff competition .

Because Giant is such an enormous brand, it purchases large quantities of quality components at a discounted price. This is how it maintains its “budget” status without compromising on the quality of the components.

This is also why the company can compete with more expensive brands at a lower price. Although some cyclists prefer Trek because of its home-ground advantage, Giant often has comparably better components for your dollar.

High-end Giant bikes hold their value quite well. Although there is depreciation across the board, the percentage is dependent on the care of the bike and its current condition .

Giant mid-range and up bikes are often kitted with sturdy and competitive components made to last many years. You should expect Giant bikes like the ToughRoad SLR 2 to hold at least 70-80% of their value , which isn’t typical for most brands.

Trek Bikes: An Overview

Trek has a storied past and a culture of adventure . The seedling of what would become the second-biggest bike brand on Earth . This American company sprouted from a pure love of cycling and would become a treasured family venture.

The Waterloo, Wisconsin-based brand and retailer came to be over a couple of beers at a local bar. At the shake of hands and pursuit of adventurous travel , the name and mission statement: Trek would be agreed upon.

The following year Trek would begin producing the longstanding 904 touring bike frames in a barn. Trek would lay the groundwork for what is to come through their handcrafted products that showcased the company’s incredibly visionary artistry .

Each meticulous build was Trek’s way of announcing that cyclists should not only expect good bikes to come from Europe . The craftsmanship and care that would go into each design would later lead to the company creating bikes that would garner several Tour de France podium positions .

Trek would shake up the cycling world in the many decades to follow with their rebellious designs . The company would grow to excel in manufacturing cutting-edge frame designs . It continues to innovate and invent to this day.

The company continues expanding to create other famous brands like:

At each brand’s forefront is:

• accessibility

Trek’s reputation almost needs no further expansion as the brand is one of the most widely recognized . This is in large part to their capability to produce both high-end to entry-level bikes . Although the company sometimes gets minor flak for not being as cost-efficient as Giant , it is still widely respected.

Trek’s lineup is built for comfort and longevity and their midrange to high-end bikes model that sentiment. Their more expensive lines hold at least 50% of their value , which is higher than average.

Durability, Warranty, and Customer Service of Giant Vs. Trek Bikes

Trek has developed something of a cult following over the years, challenging the steady following behind Giant .

Both companies have had to invest in satisfying their customers to rise to such levels. Although Trek does seem to hold some advantage when it comes to longevity, Giant also doesn’t park idly by.

Giant Bikes: Important Factors to Consider

Giant wouldn’t be able to maintain its position as the biggest bike brand in the world if its products weren’t up to snuff. The company is known for producing bikes that:

• use quality components
• last several years in decent condition

The company’s bikes often outlast similarly priced bikes . They retain their usability for years and function great even if used.

Giant has a non-transferable lifetime warranty on their bikes. You can call it in if you notice a f actory defect years after your purchase. This warranty can’t be used for a second-hand Giant bike .

Giant takes pride in their frameset and claims to do whatever it can to rectify issues.

They also offer a limited warranty on things like paint finish and original components, usually a year from the purchase date . Giant is a massive company and occasionally suffers from bad press . Still, the large consensus is that it treats its customers with respect and deals with issues in a timely manne r.

Purchases from local bike shops seem to be more favored. The online store doesn’t get the best reviews for honoring lifetime warranties and replying to customer concerns in a quick manner.

Trek Bikes: Important Factors to Consider

Trek is famous for manufacturing high-quality touring bikes that often last decades . Their durability is largely uncontested, and they have had customers loyal to them longer than the internet has been alive .

It’s good to know that Trek isn’t only recognized because of its intelligent advertisement campaigns and robust builds . They corner the market of all bike levels with decent quality and beautiful craftsmanship.

Trek is incredibly proud of its craftsmanship . The lifetime warranty on the original equipment and its aftermarket products prove that. Their warranty claim policy is straightforward, and the company tries to keep it as stress-free as possible .

They have a lifetime warranty on their framesets and full suspension parts as long as the original owner keeps them.

There’s also a 2-year warranty on their other products . Subsequent owners get a limited three-year warranty as long as you can prove that the original owner purchased the bike in that timeframe .

Like Giant, Trek is a humongous company with a mixed bag of customer feedback . While good customer service is typical, still, the company has its fair share of annoyed customers over slow response time and frustrating warranty contention .

Giant Vs. Trek: Accessibility & Servicing

Giant and Trek are such gargantuan companies that almost every bike shop can accommodate their bikes. However, it’s still important to compare each company’s ease of obtaining products and whether or not their bikes are made simple enough for home tinkerers to do light servicing by themselves.

Giant Bikes: Accessibility & Servicing

Although Giant doesn’t have manufacturing facilities here in the States, it fulfills all its orders through many retailers nationwide .

Their orders are shipped quickly and at a fraction of the cost of other brands. Many local retailers offer servicing and assembly without much hassle.

Trek: Accessibility & Servicing

Trek has the advantage of being made locally , although there’s been a move to overseas manufacturing in recent years.

The company also ships to many local bicycle retailers and fulfills servicing similarly. Most of their bikes are simple so self-servicing is possible , which significantly reduces the cost of ownership over the years.

Design, Components, and Technologies: Giant Vs. Trek

A good bike works with the user without complications . If a company can showcase its innovation through technology and implement that into its products while keeping it user-friendly , that is the best-case scenario.

Giant Bikes: Overview of Design, Componants & Technology

Giant invests a lot of effort and time into the technologies to make their brand competitive. The company is known to utilize solid components even in its entry-level bikes.

Aluxx Aluminum Technology

Giant invests a lot of effort in innovations and proudly advertises its many efforts. Giant’s Aluxx Aluminum Technology is touted as performance-level 6061 alloy aluminum .

This material is used with single-butted tubes to help create light and strong framesets across the company’s bike range. Aluxx SL and SLR Aluminum Technology is the natural evolution of this material for Giant’s higher-end models, and its performance can compete with carbon fiber.

Advanced Composite Technology

This is Giant’s quality carbon material , and the company focuses on an optimal ratio of stiffness to weight .

Giant uses High-Performance Grade raw carbon fiber material to make their custom carbon material. Final products are made as seamlessly as possible through a continuous production method called Modified Monocoque Construction . 

Aero system Shaping Technology

This is less of a technology and more of a way for Giant to lift the veil on how they work to ensure quality-performing bikes .

This “technology” of using Computational Fluid Dynamics to model their machines for the best aerodynamic performance isn’t anything. Still, it’s good to know that such a big brand is keeping up with reasonable industry standards .

Comax Composite Technology

Giant uses this production technique to create material that caters to fitness and sports riding . Their engineering labs do this by combining fiber-reinforced polymer with pure carbon fiber to manufacture framesets that are:

• lightweight
• comfortable

Compact Road Design

One of Giant’s original innovations for their high-performance bikes, it helps tailor the fit for riders of different sizes . The design helps create a smaller triangle on the front and rear of the frames, which reduces weight and increases bike stiffness .

Giant’s Mechanics and Features

They have an extensive platter of technologies and features that they’ve been honing over the years. Below are just some of the most current and prevailing technologies .

Crest 34 Suspension Fork

The Crest is Giant’s rendering of a fully tunable suspension fork . Their design is meant to give the rider comfortable and accurate steering control .

Trek Bikes: Overview of Design, Componants & Technology

Innovation and artisan design have been behind Trek’s ethos from the start. After the founders of the company realized that selling just any bike wouldn’t do, they invested heavily in handcrafted and American-made designs and technologies .

Regarding technology and components, the company focuses on quality, not quantity .

Trek’s Aerodynamics

Trek has invested much of its attention into developing racing machines that not only slice the wind but aim entirely to remove it as an obstacle.

Trek’s Materials

The company has prided itself on using quality materials to emphasize its craftsmanship and attention to detail. Their material science is a high priority next to their dedication to hand-built bikes in their Waterloo development laboratory.

OCLV Carbon

Trek has been working on perfecting its patented carbon fiber technology for over two decades, Optimum Compaction Low Void (OCLV) carbon.

Compared to most carbon usage, their manufacturing processes now produce carbon material that is :

• more varied

Trek’s seamless frames are continually tweaked and worked on, as evident from their carbon armor design . This design slows down and spreads out any acute impact on the frame and the innovation fosters rider confidence .

Alpha Aluminum

Aluminum has been the go-to material for bike construction dating back to the machine’s dawn. To this day, aluminum remains one of the cheapest materials to make a good bike.

Still, Trek doesn’t rely solely on these factors when they utilize aluminum for their bikes .

Their Alpha Aluminum bike frames use advanced science to improve the performance of their aluminum bikes. Rivaling some carbon frames, their aluminum frames have superior :

• shock absorption

Alpha Aluminum frames are more rider friendly by being less stiff and maximizing the bike ride quality . The frames are made stiff only where needed without compromising the snappiness and fun of the aluminum frame, great for riding longer on any terrain .

Trek’s Suspension

Suspension may not be necessary for non-competitive cycling off the trails. Still, it adds a welcomed comfort to day-to-day riding .

A company that has invested time in its suspension technology will reap:

• lighter rides
• offroad capabilities
• welcomed comfort

Active Braking Pivot

Trek’s Active Braking Pivot (ABP) is another one of their simple but ingenious patents . This design ensures the rider can brake without locking the rear suspension on dual-suspension bikes.

ABP helps the rider stay in control of their rear shocks and not worry about losing out on their benefits if they slam on the brakes.

With Trek’s repositioning of the rear suspension pivot, riders can use both rear suspension and brakes on dodgy route segments without losing momentum and flow .

ABP has proven to be an exceptional competitive advantage . Riders always have traction without having to rely on brakes as much because of the improved braking efficiency.

HOT TIP: Trek now uses ABP technology on their entire lineup of full-suspension mountain bikes.

Trek’s RE: Aktiv with Thru Shaft is the company’s response to riders complaining about the shock engagement lag out on the trails.

This shock system provides laser tracking out in the wild. It can seemingly respond instantaneously to terrain changes which significantly increases ride flow and pushes momentum .

The internal mechanics of these shocks can transition between high-speed and low-speed compression dampening without archaic pause. Trek is continually tweaking to make its shocks invisible while providing tangible results.

Full Floater

This rear shock mount system has two suspended contact points, creating a floating feel throughout its range of motion. Trek’s Full Floaters create the illusion of more travel without actually resorting to it, which helps with power efficiency .

Trek’s tech takes out that gnarly feeling of shocks bottoming out and transitioning too abruptly in its motion. This shock mounting setup brings an added level of comfort and efficiency to your suspension.

If you’ve spent some time perusing bike specs, you’ve probably come across IsoSpeed as a term. Without giving up the diamond-shaped frameset, IsoSpeed is a way of :

• handling predictability
• stiffness control
• frame compliance

IsoSpeed utilizes decoupling techniques that allow certain parts to respond independently, like the seat tube flexing from the road outside the top tube. This technology helps reduce rider fatigue over long distances without stealing their momentum.

Some cyclists contest that the IsoSpeed does teeter on being a gimmick . Still, the technology has been making noticeable and legit strides in fulfilling the tech’s original intent.

Giant Vs. Trek: Bike Range And Prices

Both companies have an extensive inventory of bikes for every price point and level.

Giant Bikes: Pricing & Range

Giant has bikes optimized for:

• bikes for kids

Their prices range from $500 for road bikes to around $12,500 . The company is known to include components that can be used across all of its bike types . 

Trek Bikes: Pricing & Range

Trek is famous for the technology it puts into its mountain bikes and the sturdy nature of its touring bikes. The company makes spectacular:

• women-specific bikes

Trek loses out on the market of people searching for entry-level bikes as its most affordable road bikes are around $1,000 , and the high-end is up around $14,000 .

Their hybrid category does offer bikes for around $600 . Still, the component assembly makes these leisure bikes feel like an afterthought.

Pros And Cons of Giant Vs. Trek Bikes

Giant and Trek compare against each other quite well. Geometry and suspension is often their most prominent point of divergence and a place for praise and criticism.

Again, critics admit that any qualms they have with new drops from the brands come down to their taste , and any praise is towards a solution that might not be an issue with everyone .

Giant Bikes: Pros & Cons

The company has a slight lead when it comes to variety and affordability . Their road bikes even begin at a cheaper rate. Giant tries to incorporate a few staunch components throughout their entry-level range to prop up the build.

However, this sometimes appears more of a tactic to justify a lacking build , as slapping SRAM or Shimano into a spec list can fool the layperson. Fortunately, the lifetime warranty on their frames is a big plus for many Giant veteran users. Most users also tout Giant for having comfortable builds .

Trek Bikes: Pros & Cons

Trek has become beloved for its innovative but minimalistic designs . Their origin story also serves the company well in creating authenticity .

The builds that come from the company are reliable and have proven themselves to last decades , which is why it’s helpful to have a lifetime warranty on their frames .

However, many critics aren’t too thrilled by how commercial Trek has become . A large portion of their dependability is thanks to their intelligent marketing .

Even though the company has an enormous offering of products, they aren’t as cheap as Giant . This leaves many people feeling that they are now paying more for the brand name than the product.

Trek and Giant provide a close matchup in every regard . When picking your champion, it depends entirely on your taste as either company will give you a bike you’ll enjoy for many seasons .

If you are on a budget, Giant is the brand to look at for a more extensive entry-level spread . But, your pockets are free to sail, then Trek has much to offer . 

You might also be interested in:

• Giant Vs Trek Vs Schwinn: Full Comparison
• Are Giant Bikes Good? Full Guide

Share me if you found me helpful!

• ⋙ Start Here

Search suggestions:

Popular searches:.

• Best cycling jeans
• Urban cycling brands
• stylish helmets
• Gifts for cyclists

Are Trek Bikes Worth It? (BRAND ANALYSIS)

By Kevin Glenton

Updated Sep 29, 2023

This post may contain affiliate links, which help to keep Discerning Cyclist rolling. Learn more .

Choosing which bicycle brand you wish to follow, if any, will come down to a number of personal choices and factors. Heritage, lifestyle, impact on society, ethics, values, environmental and economic factors are part of the decision-making process in signing on to any company’s goods or services.

Bicycles are a consumer product and manufacturers compete for your attention and cash. They have proven to be capable of fulfilling many needs from essential means of transportation, through to a commuting tool, leisure vehicle and source of sporting competition.

With such a wide range of uses and budgets working from a wonderfully simple design process, manufacturers need to create and furnish values and meanings to distinguish one from another.

This is especially true as many of the component parts are made by third-party providers. The bicycle manufacturer can partner with these companies who are brands in their own right.

Not Sure What Bike You Need? Take Our 10-Second Quiz⬇️

Trek is a bicycle manufacturer which has been active since 1976. They are a family-owned business from the USA who started out from a small red barn, producing 900 machines in their first year. That barn is still around, just along from their HQ.

They have had revenues reported to exceed over $1 billion per annum from sales of over a million machines and are established as a global cycling brand with main dealerships, authorised repairers and licensed outlets across the world. 

The company offers a huge range of different styles of bicycle and were early adopters of the e-bike model too. They are focused on always thinking about the next phase of their development. They offer clothing, helmets, lighting, accessories, mudguards / fenders, all through their in-house ranges.

We’ll have a little look into the journey the Trek brand has taken, some of the ups and downs and examine some of the values, qualities, messages and principles it brings to the production and sale of its bicycles in particular.

Is Trek a Good Bike Brand?

The aspects of a brand are what sets it apart from others. They provide stability, foundation and direction. Trek focuses on maintaining quality, they make their employees feel critical to the business and reward them with bonuses and incentives. Brand values help workers put in longer hours. 

A rewarded and well-compensated workforce makes fewer compromises. More of their products meet the high standards demanded from the brand. Their retail stores contain happier people to greet you. They feel invested in the company.

Once you have happy employees, you get more ideas about products, more of the right decisions are made and more people get on board with them and time and effort are saved in the production. Trek spends time caring about its employees. 

According to US business magazines, its minimum wage is above the usual amount in the USA and they have regular ‘pulse’ surveys to check in with teams. There are deliveries of gift boxes and packages to employees.

The company feels that this reflects back into the pride and love that each employee has for the finished products that are designed and made. Customers feel happy and cared about too.

As a global company, Trek needs to ensure that its responsibilities and concerns are in sync with the world around them. The company has taken steps to deliver good messages around the world although there have been rocky roads it has needed to negotiate through as well.

Trek provided the bicycles for Lance Armstrong at times when he was winning the Tour de France. No doubt they saw increased demand during his moments of victory. The fallen hero saw his personal brand take a blow in subsequent years and it is likely that the company had to rebuild its reputation too.

During a time of heightened civil-rights tensions in the US, the company responded to scenes of their bicycles being used by police to control crowds of demonstrators. 

It made a commitment to creating jobs and investing in training and scholarship programmes and funding in underserved areas of the community. It also granted employees paid time off to volunteer in non-profit areas designed to build local communities.

The company has invested over the years in technology to help with the design of frames, geometry, suspension and components too.

They have acquired companies over the years and utilised the expertise and knowledge of similarly motivated pioneers like their own founders.

Gary Fisher and Keith Bontrager are two such radicals who lit up the early mountain biking scene in the USA whose companies have and now sit under the Trek umbrella.

Who Owns Trek Bike Company?

All research done indicates that it is Intrepid Corporation. When Trek was established, an investment of start-up money came via them. The key decisions and passions stem from the co-founders, Richard Burke and Bevill Hogg. Members of the Burke family hold senior positions today.

Are Trek Bikes British?

Trek is a US company which distributes its bicycles, components and accessories all over the world. It has offices across the globe including in the United Kingdom. 

Are Trek Bikes Made by Giant?

Design and manufacture are separate elements of the process and we know that components often come from other parties. Trek designs its own bicycles and some components. Like other manufacturers, frames can be supplied from factories around the world and some of those produce frames for Giant.

Where Are Trek Bikes Manufactured?

Although Trek’s headquarters are based in Wisconsin, USA, their components and bikes are manufactured across the world, primarily in the Netherlands, China, Taiwan and Germany.

Are Trek Bikes Expensive?

Entry-level adult bikes from Trek start at £475 ($500) but can reach as high as £13,600 ($13,549) for premium models. Of the 329 bikes available to buy on Trek’s website, the average price of a Trek bike was £4414.80 ($5840), while the median price was £3,600 ($4,762).

Trek bicycles are more expensive than those you might purchase from bicycle supermarkets and less so than handmade machines designed and manufactured in Italian artisan workshops.

Why is Trek So Expensive?

It is a fact of commercial life that sometimes the best brands have a price tag attached to the values they highlight.

Rather than specialising in niche areas, Trek offers machines for all riders. This costs more than putting all your eggs in one basket. It invests in quality materials, new technologies and design methods. It runs hundreds of retail outlets around the world. Research and marketing come at a price.

Their trust in the products is the catalyst for their lifetime warranty on newer frame sets (frame and rigid fork), main frame and full suspension swing arms for the lifetime of the original owner and for their in house carbon wheels with carbon rims. Manufacturers have introduced part-carbon, part-alloy wheels so the distinction is necessary.

Clothing, parts and accessories, rear suspension linkage components, including bearings, rocker link and accompanying hardware and components, Bontrager wheels with alloy rims and paint and transfers have a two-year warranty package. Some of their kit made before 2019 also benefits from a warranty package.

They have aftercare for carbon materials and their customer service also supports good relationships and a culture of listening to you when you bring your bicycle in. 

Trek Bikes: Cheapest vs Most Expensive Model

Are Trek Bikes Overpriced?

Trek bicycles are trusted and well thought of in their own country and worldwide. Negative views tend to be limited to brand decisions or sales decisions unrelated to manufacture or design. There are so many competitors to take sales away from Trek but this does not seem to affect them.

Their lowest full-price bicycle for Discerning Cyclists is the 2021 FX 1 Disc Hybrid bike , which retails for £475 ($500). The disc brakes inspire more confidence, it has internal cable routing for cleanliness and reduces the risk of damage.

The Trek Alpha Aluminum frame it uses is regularly reviewed and updated for strength and as an entry-level bicycle offers full mudguard / fender and rack compatibility,

Do Trek Bikes Keep Their Value?

With a good level of support via the warranty scheme which extends to secondary owners and a brand-leading reputation, Trek represents a good win for owners and prospective owners. 

Trek invests in frame geometry design and is innovative. They have a reputation for quality and comfort. Trusted around the world, they support pro teams to enhance the value of their products and they have a wide support network. This helps build confidence in their offer and supporting value.

A 2019 Trek Domane SL7 Disc Women’s road bike would cost £4,178 ($5,780) new. In good condition, the value would be up to £2,351 ($3,252). This model retains more value than the average equivalent bicycle . Other examples are available with a search on second-hand sites.

Do Trek Bikes Go On Sale?

Like most manufacturers, when a specific line comes to an end, their prices will be reduced in order to help sales and move the inventory on. Trek has distribution licensing deals with independent bicycle retail outlets and these shops sell them at discounted prices too. 

Is a Trek Bike Worth the Money?

The long-standing nature of Trek in a competitive marketplace is a good sign of value for money.  Reviews and feedback about quality, lifespan and service build the whole package. Decisions made about downshifting to less expensive machines might be linked to other factors like use or budget. 

If your employer is signed up to any one of the many Cycle to Work schemes which operate in the UK, a Trek bicycle could be acquired and the cost can be spread over a couple of years.

How Long Does a Trek Bike Last?

The build quality of the frame and components made by Trek give them a good reputation for being long lasting. As always, use and care play a part and mechanical components on a bicycle wear out through use. I have ridden one Trek frame since 2013 and one since 2019 and each performs well for me.

Trek Bikes Pros + Cons

Is a trek bike good for commuting to work.

With the reputation for quality and range of bicycles on offer, Trek would be considered a good bicycle for commuting to work. Many of the products in their range of commuting bicycles come ready made for accepting racks and mudguards / fenders and lighting accessories too.

Best Trek Bikes for Commuting 

Best Electric Trek Bike: Verve +1

As city-living and dwelling increases in the 21st Century, transportation by bicycle is becoming legitimised again as it once was in the early and mid 20th century without shame or embarrassment. 

Road networks are diversifying to accept designated cycle lanes and not just in city centres. The bicycle is sharing space safely, albeit slowly, with other forms of transport and not being shunted to canal towpaths or side streets.

This electric bicycle is intended to work with you and for you to do whatever your life in the city demands. Sure, it’s not designed for trails but it has suspension forks because we know that potholes come around as soon as they are mended.

It comes with your choice of a Bosch Active Line pedal assist battery, is equipped with mudguards, a built in lock and a rack so you are ready to go as soon as it leaves the shop. 

It has wide tyres for stability and disc brakes to help you stop resolutely and assuredly. It has a sit up Dutch-bike style and is available with a standard top tube or walk through top tube. It comes with a chain guard.

As road traffic snarls up congested streets, this is a £2,000 investment that has what it takes, to take you anywhere you want to go in the urban environment and on the country roads each day.

Trek Verve +1 Electric Bike

The ideal commuter e-bike. Powered by a Bosch Active Line battery that has a massive range of up to 88km. Prices from: 🇬🇧 UK: £2000 🇪🇺 EU: €2200 🇺🇸 US: $2500

Best Trek Bike: Domane AL 3 Disc

This bicycle can give you access to many different moods, landscapes and adventure but if and when you need it cor commuting, it will be stable, dependable and laid-back.

It’s a real all-rounder at this price and combines road racing handlebars, aspects of gravel racing geometry and technology, plus a weight and gearing to give you confidence to try longer rides. 

Tyre clearance is wide enough to allow for all-action weekend work on the light trails, racks and mudguard / fenders can easily be fitted, disc brakes are standard for when you need to slow down and the main components come from Shimano. The Domane concept is taken forward into Trek’s most comfortable endurance road-riding 

Trek Domane Al 3 Disc Bike

A simply stunning road bike that can also handle light gravel trails. Light and fast. Prices from: 🇬🇧 UK: £1100 🇪🇺 EU: €1150 🇺🇸 US: $1380

Best Value Trek Bike: FX 1 Disc 2022

Without being the lightest, or most technologically-advanced bicycle in the range, the FX 1 Disc is a boon for beginners. 

This hybrid is designed with a lightweight frame specially machined to save weight and offer a comfortable ride, it comes with a wide 16-speed gear ratio, solid if unspectacular wheels with a wide clearance as required. There is a chain guard fitted as standard. It will be a friendly and reliable workhorse and companion. It won’t show up as glowing hot if you need to lock it up in the open and won’t encourage you to take risks on the city streets.

Trek FX 1 Disc Bike

Trek's best value commuter bike. The lightweight aluminium frame ensures this is a nippy ride, while also boasting powerful disc brakes. Prices from: 🇬🇧 UK: £550 🇪🇺 EU: €514 🇺🇸 US: $650

Discerning Cyclist Store

Visit the Discerning Cyclist's Shop

Ride in style

Join our weeky newsletter to get early access to our latest discoveries.

Related reads

8 Things You Can Do to Prevent E-Bike Theft

By Herman Eloff

8 Uses for Cargo Bikes That Will Make Your Life Easier

By Lawrence Bywater

Should E-Bikes Be Banned? (The Truth)

By Lawrence Goozee

7 Reasons You’ll Probably Own an E-Bike in the Next 10 Years (If You Don’t Already)

No, Electric Bikes Are NOT “Lazy” (5 Stats That Prove It)

Best Italian Bicycle Brands: Top 20 Manufacturers in Italy

Trek Bicycle

President & CEO

CEO Approval Rating

Private Subsidiary of Roth Distributing Co., Inc.

https://www.trekbikes.com/

Trek Bicycle Competitors

Trending Companies

All of cycling information sources

Home » FAQ » What Are Three Indirect Competitors For Trek Bicycle

What Are Three Indirect Competitors For Trek Bicycle

What are the indirect competitors for trek bicycle.

Despite the success of being the largest U.S. bike manufacturer, Trek has four major competitors: Giant Manufacturing, Specialized Bicycle Components, Electra Bicycle Company, and Schwinn Bicycle Company.

What are the top 3 direct competitors for Trek?

Top Competitors of Trek Bicycle Giant Bicycles. 1,800. $2 Billion. Specialized. 1,600. $434 Million. Canyon Bicycles. 800. $248 Million. Huffy. 605. $164 Million. Mongoose. 575. $115 Million. Scott Sports. 1,000. $87 Million. Evans Cycles. 1,000. $280 Million. Accell Group. 3,410. $1 Billion.

Who is Trek Bicycle competitors?

Trek Bicycle Corporation competitors include scott, Specialized Bicycle Components, Shimano and Giant Bicycles. Trek Bicycle Corporation ranks 1st in CEO Score on Comparably vs its competitors.

What are the three different types of cycling?

“At their core, road cycling, mountain biking and cyclocross are all about pedaling, but each sport is quite different,” says Ted King, a U.S. professional road-racing cyclist who rides for Cannondale Pro Cycling.

How many employees does trek have?

Today, Trek is a billion-dollar company with 2,000 employees, half of whom work in Wisconsin, and it still makes custom road bikes by hand in the US.

Who owns specialized?

This is Mike Sinyard, founder and owner of Specialized, one of the founding fathers of mountain biking and a man at the helm of a bicycle company that now measures its annual turnover in eight figures.

Is Trek owned by giant?

Giant is the world’s largest bike manufacturer by revenue. The company sells bikes under its own name and makes them for major brands like Trek, Scott and Colnago. At 79, Mr.

Are Trek bikes good?

Are Trek Bikes Any Good? Yes, Trek bikes are very good. Trek has a long history of making quality bikes that are used by beginner, hobby, and elite cyclists around the world. Trek bikes last for a long time and have excellent reselling value years after purchase.

What is the best bike brand in the world?

From the abundant options, we have listed down the 8 best bike brands around the globe. Trek: We have seen Trek bike everywhere, it is a very popular brand and it possesses a rich heritage. Cannondale: Kona: Specialized: Merida: Scott: Santa Cruz: Cervelo:.

Is Giant bikes publicly traded?

(commonly known as Giant) is a Taiwanese bicycle manufacturer, recognized as the world’s largest bicycle manufacturer.Giant Bicycles. Type Public Traded as TWSE: 9921 Industry Bicycle manufacturing Founded Dajia, Taichung, Taiwan, 1972 Founder King Liu.

What is a cycling competition called?

Road bicycle racing is the cycle sport discipline of road cycling, held on paved roads. Road racing is the most popular professional form of bicycle racing, in terms of numbers of competitors, events and spectators.

Which type of cycling is best?

Road bikes are best for riding on smooth, asphalted roads. Mountain bikes are best for riding off road. Hybrid bikes are a very popular choice for bike commuters, thanks to their versatility. Touring bikes are built for the road less travelled, and also make excellent commuters for rough city roads.

What are types of cycling?

There are several categories of bicycle racing including road bicycle racing, cyclo-cross, mountain bike racing, track cycling, BMX, and cycle speedway. Non-racing cycling sports include artistic cycling, cycle polo, freestyle BMX and mountain bike trials. Bicycle racing is recognised as an Olympic sport.

Who is the CEO of Trek?

John Burke has worn a lot of hats at Trek Bicycle since his first job packing parts when he was in high school. He’s been the president of the company since 1997.

Did trek buy Gary Fisher?

Trek Buys Gary Fisher Bikes After Trek purchased Gary Fisher Bikes in 1993, the Fisher brand began to excel. The brand was being sold in 500 locations in the U.S. and over 20 countries worldwide. In 2002, Gary would introduce the 29er.

What country makes Trek bikes?

Milwaukee, WI.

What is better Trek or Specialized?

There isn’t a clear winner. Both offer similar bikes and components in the same price range. Trek has a wider variety of bikes to choose from compared to Specialized. At entry-level, you get slightly better parts when you go with Specialized.

What bicycles are made in USA?

Recap: Best Bikes Made in the USA Detroit Bikes A-Type – Lightweight City Bike. Allied Cycle Works Echo – Performance Road Bike. Co-Motion Cycles Camino – All-Purpose Road Bike. Litespeed Bicycles Pinhoti Boost – All-Purpose Mountain Bike. Chumba USA URSA Major Titanium 1.0 – Fat Tire Bike.

Why is there a shortage of specialized bikes?

Some overseas factories did shut down for a time, and shipping is way up in general for tons of products, but with the bike shortage, it’s mostly a surge in demand that has overwhelmed factories.

Why is Trek so expensive?

One of the biggest factors in the cost of bicycles is materials. Carbon fiber comes in various forms and grades. The higher the quality of carbon, the greater the cost of sourcing from manufacturers. If a bike manufacturer is also fabricating its own carbon, this cost must be recouped in the sale price of a bike.

Why are Trek bikes so heavy?

It’s heavy because of Disc-brake and IsoSpeed, two huge weight contributors. Plus, the current one adds 200 more grams with the T47 schell, the built-in storage box and the excessively wider tire clearance Their first 2021 bike may be OCLV800-based Domane SLR. Why is the Trek Domane SLR7 so heavy???Feb 17, 2021.

Is trek made in China?

Most Trek bicycles are manufactured outside the United States, in countries including the Netherlands, Germany, Taiwan and China.

What is Trek known for?

Trek is known for building technologically advanced bicycles for the market. Trek unveiled a collection of road, mountain, and hybrid bikes along with best in class parts, accessories and riding gear available at retailers throughout India.

Are Trek bikes unisex?

Trek’s lineup includes gender-neutral and women’s models, which have touchpoints like saddles and handlebars that can provide a better fit and feel to some women from the start. Every model is held to the same high standard of comfort and performance. No two riders are exactly the same, and that’s why we have options.

Do Trek bikes hold their value?

Specialized and Trek bicycles often have excellent value, as these brands are known for quality manufacturing and are desired by bike enthusiasts. What is this? Their S-Works models really hold their value.”.

Related Posts

• Quick Answer: What Are The Top Three Direct Competitors For Trek Bicycle
• Question: Who Are The Top Three Competitors Of Trek Bikes
• Who Owns Trek Bicycle Company
• Question: Is My Trek Bicycle Registered
• Who Are Trek Bicycle Stakeholders
• Quick Answer: Who Makes Trek Bicycle Frames
• How To Find Bicycle Model Trek
• Question: Is Your Trek Bicycle Still Available
• Quick Answer: What Year Is My Trek Bicycle
• Question: Where Are Trek Bicycle Frames Made
• Question: Whos Cheaper Trek Or Budget Bicycle
• What Is Trek

• Help Center
• Chat with a Ride Guide
• 1-866-401-9636
• Retail Store
• Bike Services

Reset Password

We will send you an email to reset your password.

Don't have an account? Create an account

Create Account

Already have an account? Sign In

• Favorite your products & save them to your account
• Save a search & get notified when new products drop
• Be first to know about the latest events & promotions

Bike Finder

Results have arrived, the best trail hardtail: specialized fuse expert 29 vs. trek roscoe 9.

The Specialized Fuse 29 and Trek Roscoe are the two most popular aluminum trail hardtails on the market. We compare the best-selling 2023 Fuse Expert 29 and Roscoe 9 models to see which mountain bike is best.

Written by: Bruce Lin

Published on: Nov 14, 2023

Posted in: Guides

What’s the best mountain bike to get if you’re on a budget? The answer is an affordable and versatile trail hardtail. Trail hardtails are simple (there’s no rear suspension) so they’re cheaper and easier to own and maintain. But with relaxed geometry and a longer travel fork, they can handle a wide range of terrain from fast flow trails to steep and gnarly downhill tracks.  

The two most popular models in the trail hardtail category are the Specialized Fuse Expert 29 and the Trek Roscoe 9. They’re best sellers and they come with decent mid-range components so they won’t need any upgrades. But how do they stack up against one another? We compare these two do-it-all hardtails to find out. 

[button] Shop Mountain Bikes [/button]

1. Specialized Fuse vs. Trek Roscoe: Overview

Both bikes use aluminum frames with threaded bottom brackets, internal cable routing, two bottle cage mounts, and 29” wheels. Both weigh right around 30 pounds, which is fairly standard for entry- to mid-level aluminum hardtails.

Both use TransX dropper seatposts. Other than the drivetrains, the biggest difference between the two bikes is in the forks. The Fuse comes with a 130mm Fox Rhythm 34 while the Roscoe uses a 140mm Fox Rhythm 36. The Fox 34 is lighter because it has thinner 34mm stanchions compared to the Fox 36 which uses 36mm stanchions. On the flip side, the Fox 36 is a bit stiffer and has more travel than the Fox 34, which keeps it a bit more plush feeling and composed on rough terrain. The Fox 36 caters more toward aggressive downhill riding while the Fox 34 is a bit more balanced for all-around trail riding. 

One other feature worth noting is the sliding rear dropouts on the Fuse. This gives riders the option to adjust the chainstay length or set the frame up as a single speed. 

2. Specialized Fuse Expert 29 vs. Trek Roscoe 9: Component Comparison

• Frame: Both frames are nearly identical in terms of construction and quality. I prefer the adjustable rear dropouts of the Fuse, however, because it gives riders more adjustability, plus additional options for fixing backcountry mechanicals or trying a future singlespeed build. Winner: Fuse
• Fork: Both use Fox Rhythm forks with the basic Grip damper. I tend to prefer the stiffer Fox 36 chassis because I ride more rough and technical downhills. Winner: Roscoe
• Drivetrain: SRAM GX vs. Shimano SLX/XT are both super solid and reliable. I’m a SRAM user, and I like that the Fuse has a 52t granny gear (vs. 51t) and it doesn’t use a third-party crankset (the Roscoe uses an e*thirteen crank). Winner: Fuse 
• Brakes: Both bikes have 4-piston brakes for extra stopping power. I personally prefer the feel of SRAM brakes to Shimano. Winner: Fuse
• Wheels: Both bikes use entry-level alloy wheels with 29mm internal rim widths and basic hubs. There’s really nothing to choose between these wheels, but I like that the Bontragers aren’t generic and at least have a model name… Winner: Roscoe
• Dropper: Both bikes use basic TransX droppers with similar travel for the various frame sizes. I’m going to give this to the Roscoe though because it uses the more common 31.6mm size versus the oversized 34.9mm dropper on the Fuse. It will be easier to replace or upgrade in the future. Winner: Roscoe
• Weight: With the stock build, the Roscoe is about a pound lighter. Winner: Roscoe
• Price: The Roscoe retails for $400 less. Winner: Roscoe

Final Score

• Fuse Expert 29: 3
• Roscoe 9: 5

It looks like the Roscoe beats out the Fuse by a couple of points, but keep in mind that these points are mostly based on my personal tastes and are pretty subjective.

Some features may also be more important to some riders than others. For example, the sliding rear dropout is the standout feature of the Fuse to me, and it’s the main reason I’d pick the Fuse, but many other riders likely won’t care about it. 

3.  Specialized Fuse vs. Trek Roscoe: Geometry Comparison

The Fuse and Roscoe use very similar geometry. The biggest difference between the two frames is the head angle. The Roscoe’s 65-degree head angle is 1.5 degrees slacker than the Fuse (which also gives the Roscoe a ~20mm longer wheelbase). What does this mean? In the most basic terms, the Roscoe will feel more stable while the Fuse will feel more agile. Both bikes can handle a very wide range of terrain, but if you’re regularly riding steep and fast downhill trails, the slacker Roscoe will feel a bit more confidence-inspiring. The Fuse, on the other, will feel less sluggish on climbs, and more lively on flat or rolling trails. 

Both bikes have decently steep seat angles to put riders in a good position over the cranks on steep climbs, but the Roscoe’s seat angle is slightly steeper, which some riders might prefer (though I honestly don’t think that 0.7 degrees will make that big of a difference). 

The other notable difference is in the stack height. In every size, the Fuse has 5-10mm less stack height. This can be important to riders who want to run a lower bar height for XC riding. 

Note that the Fuse has a range for chainstay length because of the sliding rear dropouts. It can be adjusted to be both shorter (more agile) and longer (more stable) than the Roscoe. 

Finally, it’s worth noting that the Roscoe is also available in an additional M/L size. This could be good for riders who feel like they are between the medium and large sizes. 

4. Concluding Thoughts 

With a lighter Fox 34 fork and slightly steeper head angle, the Fuse should appeal more to riders who lean more toward the XC side of the riding spectrum. For riders more interested in the enduro and downhill side of the spectrum, the bigger Fox 36 fork and slacker head angle of the Roscoe will be more appealing.

As for value, the Fuse Expert 29 and Roscoe 9 have very comparable specs, so the Roscoe is the better value with a retail price that is $400 less. 

What would I pick? Personally, I’d choose the Fuse. As I’ve already mentioned, I’m a SRAM fan and I like having a sliding rear dropout so I can convert the bike to a singlespeed someday in the future. What would you choose?

More Guides

FAQs, Guides, Latest, MTB Apr 3, 2024

FAQ: Top 5 Mountain Bikes That Hold Their Value

Features, Gravel, Guides, Latest Apr 1, 2024

Waxing Your Chain vs. Using Wet Lube for Dust, Mud, & Unbound Gravel

Guides Mar 26, 2024

Shimano vs. SRAM: Guide to Groupsets, Drivetrains, Brakes, and More

Features, Gravel, Guides, Latest Mar 25, 2024

1x vs. 2x: What Drivetrain Should You Race at Unbound Gravel?

Features, Gravel, Guides, Latest Mar 21, 2024

Choosing The Best Tire Setup for Racing Unbound Gravel

FAQs, Guides Mar 18, 2024

The Best Used Bike Marketplaces Online (& Offline Too) in 2024

FAQs, Guides, Latest, Road Mar 14, 2024

FAQ: The Roval Alpinist CL II vs. Roval Rapide CL II

Guides, Latest, Road, Tech Feb 23, 2024

The Best Affordable Carbon Road Wheels for Budget Racers

Features, Guides, Latest Feb 20, 2024

QUOC Shoe Review & Guide: Simple, Stylish, & Refined Cycling Shoes

Guides, Latest Jan 29, 2024

The Ultimate New & Used E-Bike Buyer’s Guide

Guides, Latest, Tech Jan 19, 2024

Road, Gravel & Mountain Bike Tire Pressure: Beginner's Guide w/PSI Chart

Gravel, Guides, Opinion Jan 13, 2024

Gear for Old Man Winter: The 12 Essentials for Winter Riding Kit

New arrivals.

Certified Pre-Owned

Cannondale SystemSix Carbon Red eTap AXS Road Bike - 2020, 54cm

Specialized Turbo Kenevo Comp 6Fattie Mountain E-Bike - 2021, S4

Felt IA Advanced Ultegra Di2 Triathlon Bike - 2020, 56cm

Salsa Cycles Beargrease C SLX Fat Bike - 2022, Large

Specialized Epic Pro Mountain Bike - 2018, Medium

Yeti SB6 Turq Mountain Bike - 2019, X-Large

Specialized Roubaix Sport Road Bike - 2022, 56cm

Cervélo Caledonia Ultegra Road Bike - 2022, 48cm

Trek Émonda SL 6 Pro Road Bike - 2023, 56cm

Santa Cruz 5010 C XT Mountain Bike - 2022, X-Large

Bombtrack Hook EXT-C Gravel Bike - 2020, X-Small

Rodeo Labs Flaanimal 5.0 Titanium Gravel Bike - 2022, 61cm

Trek Domane vs Specialized Roubaix: Which Is The Best Endurance Road Bike?

In this post I’m going to compare the Trek Domane with the Specialized Roubaix. Which, if you’ve stumbled upon this post by accident and you’ve missed the tone of things round here, are both road bikes.

I’ll give an overview of the range of bikes available within each of these model families. I’ll also look at the particular features that are specific to the bikes, particularly in the area of comfort and ride smoothening.

This is part of a series of posts I’m writing, comparing the road bikes stables of these two large US bike manufacturers, Trek and Specialized. If you haven’t already, you should check out my introductory post on the subject .

Whilst other posts in this series (will) deal with aero bikes, lighter climbing bikes and gravel bikes, this one is really about my specialist subject (sort of): the bike for the older, more comfort-seeking gent.

Or ‘endurance road bike’, as the cycling industry seems set on calling it.

Why I Might Be Biased

I own a Trek Domane (a 4.3, which I bought in 2013). I really like it.

So much so that I just took it back to the frame, cleaned all the components, bought some new bits and then put it all back together:

I do therefore have an affinity towards it, and Trek in general.

That said, I would  really  like a Roubaix (or any high-end Specialized road bike), so I can’t see me being particularly negative about it, or the company as a whole, as I write this post.

Drool mode… engaged:

Bikes Mentioned In This Post

Er, this isn’t going to come as much of a shock…

• Specialized Roubaix – click here to visit the Specialized website to see the full range
• Trek Domane – click here to see the Domane at Trek

Note: this post contains affiliate links. If you click and buy something, I get a commission.

It’s All In The (Brand) Positioning

Trek and Specialized, pretty early on, both identified that the sort of bike frame that might suit the amateur MAMIL (more relaxed geometry; a bike that soaks up bumps in the road; a more upright riding position, all else being equal) was similar to that used by the pros in the more arduous cobbled classics races (sort of: the pros still use an aggressive riding position).

Thusly, with a bit of smart branding, we could buy a bike altogether more suited to our riding needs and low levels of flexibility whilst still pretending that we had a race-ready riding rig.

If Fabian Cancellara was riding the Domane and Tom Boonen the Roubaix whilst battling it out on the  Carrefour de l’Arbre  in the early 2010s, who could question the pro pedigree of our choice of bike?

Fabian Cancellara's farewell Paris-Roubaix Trek Domane SLR | https://t.co/U3YFUhcXU6 https://t.co/DizNSUTTvt pic.twitter.com/0GX0kKRfur — Cyclingnews (@Cyclingnewsfeed) April 8, 2016

In fact, in the pro world, there is probably less of a gap between ‘endurance’ and ‘race’ bikes these days.

The early and middle parts of races are generally being ridden with more intensity, so race management is much more about reducing fatigue going into the later stages.

Increasing rider comfort on the bike can help with this, and this is being reflected in pro bike geometry, riding positions and tyre choices.

Professionals still look better on a bike than us mere mortals though.

Trek (You Say) Domane

Trek’s endurance bike is the Domane. No one seems to know how to pronounce the word.

Whilst sort of looking French, it’s made up. It’s an anagram of Madone (the name of Trek’s aero road bike, as well as an infamous climb near Nice).

If I were in Trek’s marketing department, I’d say it the same way you pronounce ‘domain’ in English. As I’m not, it seems to be ‘doe-ma-knee’ (emphasis on the ‘ma’).

I Am A Very Happy Domane Owner

You can  read my ‘review’ of my Domane 4.3 here . That was written years ago (I’m thinking of doing an update in video form). Here’s a photo from the archives:

I bought the bike back in July 2013 as part of an extensive overhaul of my whole bike setup ( new bike, new bike fit, new pedals, new shoes ). It hasn’t disappointed. It’s still going strong.

One of the reasons for getting the Domane (in addition to trying to fool myself that I’m a pro Spring classics rider) was that if it was designed to be robust enough for the Roubaix cobbles, then it must be capable of dealing with the Derbyshire potholes. This reasoning has played out.

My Domane has been subject to a good amount of (road surface based) abuse. I’ve upgraded the wheels (to these Campagnolo Zondas ) but the stock ones (Bontrager) held up well.

Is That Frame Broken (Fire Up The Isospeed Decoupler)?

The most innovative feature of the Domane is the fact that the top tube doesn’t actually connect to the seat post. Which sounds like a recipe for disaster.

In truth the tubes do connect. They’re just not fused together (is that what they do with carbon fibre? ‘bonded’ maybe). Instead, there is an ‘Isospeed Decoupler’ linking the two.

This bracket allows the seat tube to flex (a bit) over its full length, rather than being held in place where it meets the top tube. This limited amount of ‘give’ reduces vibration and that brittle jarring you get when riding over rough surfaces.

And ‘rough surfaces’ is essentially the lot of the British MAMIL in his home environment.

All this vibration damping and flexing at one of the key rider contact points aims to reduce (unnecessary) fatigue over the course of the ride, so the rider is fresh enough to contest the selection, when it comes. Or in my case, to allow me to finish a ride (hopefully).

Upgrades To The Original Domane

My Trek Domane features the first generation of Isospeed ride cushioning.

Subsequent models have seen a number of iterations of the rear ride dampening technology.

In addition to making the joint more sleek, for the higher end SLR models, Trek has given riders the ability to adjust the amount of flex in the seat tube via moving a slider, initially on the seat tube itself and, most recently, underneath the top tube.

The original rear Isospeed was introduced for the derrière. Since then, Trek has brought in a front Isospeed for your…. arrière?

The front Isospeed is located at the top of the headseat, allowing for (again, limited) flex in the steerer tube, reducing the road noise that riders feel through their arms.

Trek describes the headset as sitting in a rocker cup. This allows front and back movement in the steerer tube, but no lateral movement. Which is probably a good thing if you want to avoid riding into hedges.

You can  read more about the whole Isospeed caboodle on the Trek website  (if you should so desire…).

Other Things That Have Changed Since 2013…

Whilst the UK legislative agenda may have ground to a halt, we’ve at least had the ‘disc brake revolution’.

All Domanes these days come with disc brakes only. No rim brakes allowed (other than on the aluminium version, the AL, but thats essentially a different bike for a different blog post).

With great (disc brakes) power comes great responsibility (tyre clearance). I recall when I bought my Domane, much fanfare was made about its ability to handle wider tyres. That was something like 28cm.

The most recent generation of Domanes can take up to a 38cm width. They’ll be fitting it with front and rear suspension next. Oh, wait…

Next, the latest generation of Domanes have a hole (deliberately) in the down tube which provides an internal storage compartment for tools and, say, a CO2 cartridge.

And what’s this?

The Trek Domane No Longer Uses A Press Fit Bottom Bracket!

That’s right. The BB90 press fit bottom bracket that is apparently hated by everyone (but which I enjoyed learning how to fit in this video) has been replaced with a T47 threaded bottom bracket.

Mechanics everywhere will rejoice. Monty will stand around looking vacant.

(Whilst he’s looking vacant, let’s move on to the Specialized Roubaix)

Roubaix Roubaix Roubaix Roubay (Ooo-oo-ooo-oo)

Specialized’s endurance bike model is, as mentioned, the Roubaix. It featured on the short list of bikes I considered back in 2013.

Roubaix is a town in northern France famous historically for producing wool and textiles. It was chosen as a model name by Specialized to fit in with its strategy of choosing industrial names for bikes, like the Tarmac.

(I’m very tempted just to stop here…)

Sure, there’s a famous bike race each year that finishes in the Roubaix velodrome. Famous for traversing 29 cobbled sectors ( proper  cobbles). Famous for testing riders and their bikes to the limit. And being called ‘the Hell of the North’.

So Specialized probably named the Roubaix after that. Sure sure sure.

Does The Specialized Roubaix Have Suspension?

At the time I was looking at buying a Roubaix, Specialized tackled the whole ‘quasi-suspension’ thing by integrating ‘Zertz’ inserts into the seat stays and the fork.

These plastic (okay, ‘viscoelastic polymer’) dampeners purported to absorb vibrations that would otherwise pass unhindered into the rider’s butt-oxe and hands.

Specialized adopts a similar principle to the comfort features of the Domane. Logic as follows:

• Vibrations lead to fatigue.
• Fatigue leads to tiredness.
• Tiredness leads to pain.
• Pain leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to… suffering.

Anygroad, Specialized have dispensed with Zertz in the most recent generations of Roubaix (Roubaiz?). Instead they do have an actual shock absorbing piston, with 20mm of travel, built into the head tube.

This feature, known as the ‘Future Shock’ gives (understandably) more vertical movement than the Zertz-based flexy-forks approach. This makes for a more comfortable rider experience in the ‘cockpit’ area of the bike.

Like Trek’s Isospeed feature (in the more expensive models), the Future Shock 2.0 used in bikes at the higher end of the Roubaix range can be adjusted to control the amount of dampening.

Towards the bottom end of the range (Roubaix Comp and below), the Future Shock 1.5 is used, which does not have the adjustment knob (it still has 20mm of travel though).

Does The Specialized Roubaix Have Rear Suspension?

In short, no.

Distinct from the Domane, the Roubaix provides no mechanical ‘comfort features’ around the seat tube and chain stays. Your butt-oxe will no longer be cossetted. Many apologies.

That said, all of the models come with the S-Works Pave seatpost (there you go – a little bit of S-Works bling, even at the low end of the range).

Specialized states that the Pave is the ‘first compliant seatpost that’s aerodynamic’ and without any ‘contraptions’ (surely a dig at Trek?). More flex has been built into upper part of the seat post (quite what ‘more flex’ is relative to isn’t stated).

Anyhoo, at least Specialized are thinking about these things, so it’ll be better than nothing.

The Specialized Roubaix Range

The aim of this section is to give an overview of the Specialized Roubaix range so you can quickly triangulate between the name (Sport, Comp, etc), the price and the high level spec.

For more detail you’ll want to check out the Specalized website (also the range differs slightly between the US and the UK).

Roubaix Sport

• Cost: £2,750 / $2,900
• Frame: FACT 10R
• Suspension: Future shock 1.5
• Colour scheme options: 2
• Components: Shimano 105 R7000 (11 speed) other than Praxis Alba crankset (compact)
• Wheels: DT Swiss R470

Roubaix Comp

• Cost: £3,500 / $3,600
• Components: Shimano Ultegra R8000; compact 11 speed; clutch rear derailleur RX800

Roubaix Expert

• Cost: £4,750 / $6,000 (no idea why the US price is so high relative to the UK)
• Colour scheme options: 1
• Suspension: Future shock 2.0
• Components: Shimano Ultegra R8000 Di2; compact 11-speed; clutch rear derailleur RX805 (Di2)

Roubaix Pro

• Cost: £6,600 / $6,700
• Suspension: Future Shock 2.0
• Components: SRAM Force eTAP with RED etap rear derailleur; 12 speed; compact (46/33t)
• Wheels: Rovel Alpinist CL

S-Works Roubaix – SRAM Red eTAP AXS

• Cost: £10,500
• Frame: FACT 11R
• Components: SRAM RED eTAP AXS 12-speed with power meter
• Wheels: Rovel Alpinist CLX

S-Works Roubaix – Sagan Collection

• Cost: £10,069
• Components: Dura-Ace Di2 11-speed with dual-sided powermeter
• Wheels: Rovel Rapide CLX

The Trek Domane Range

Oof, there are a lot of variants of the Domane available, making them difficult to summarise without this post descending into a turdpile of tedium*.

(* Ha ha, yes, I see, you already think it’s a tur…)

Again, you’ll want to check out the full range at the Trek website:

At the top end you have the SLR series of bikes, all of which use Trek’s highest quality OCLV 700 Series carbon frame (something to do with the quality of the carbon layup…).

Then you have a few sub-variants:

• SLR 6 – mechanical Ultegra / Bontrager Aeolus Pro 3V wheels – $6,800 / £5,500
• SLR 7 – electronic Ultegra Di2 / Bontrager Aeolus Pro 3V wheels – $7,800-8,300 / £6,350-6,900
• SLR 7 eTap – wireless electronic SRAM Force eTap AXS / Bontrager Aeolus Pro 3V wheels – $8,500-8,800 / £7,000
• SLR 9 – electronic Dura-Ace Di2 / Bontrager Aeolus RSL 37 wheels – $12,000 / £10,000
• SLR 9 etap – wireless electronic SRAM RED eTap AXS / Bontrager Aeolus RSL 37 wheels – $12,000 / £10,100

In case you’re wondering, the prices ranges for the two SLR 7 variants is because there appears to be a ‘standard’ colour scheme for each one (lower price) and then a few colour options that are built to order (higher price)

The SLs all have the OCLV 500 series frame. Not as high spec as the 700 but designed to be lightweight, strong and stiff (but aren’t they all…).

• SL 4 – mix of Shimano Tiagra and Praxis / Bontrager Affinity Disc wheels – $2,400 / £2,100
• SL 5 – Shimano 105 / Bontrager Affinity Disc wheels – $2,900 / £2,550
• SL 6 – mechanical Ultegra / Bontrager Paradigm Comp wheels – $3,800 / £3,350
• SL 7 – electronic Ultegra Di2 / Bontrager Aeolus Pro 3V wheels – $6,000 / £5,100
• SL 7 eTap – wireless electronic SRAM Force eTap AXS / Bontrager Aeolus Pro 3V wheels – $6,200 / £5,650

In case it’s not obvious (it really isn’t), you can transmogrify between the SLR and SL ranges to see that the number 7, say, corresponds to a spec featuring Ultegra Di2 and Aeolus Pro 3V wheels.

I’ll save the electric and aluminium versions of the Domane for other blog posts.

Is There A Trek Domane Women’s Bike?

Actually, yes. And no. Mainly no.

Trek used to do a higher end women’s version of the Domane. Now they are saying that for all new Domane SLRs and SLs, they’re producing frame sizes down to 44cm (i.e. small). So there should be an option that fits every rider, whether they are man, woman or squirrel.

As an aside, there are two new AL (aluminium-framed) versions of the Domane that are described as ‘Women’s’. The frames do look slightly different to the equivalent men’s models (they’re a different colour at least) but the bumf on the website makes more of them being fitted with ‘women-specific’ saddles and handlebars than the geometry.

It’s Probably Worth Saying…

I’ve only ridden one Trek Domane (the one in my garage). The technology and ride feel has no doubt moved on. Similarly, I’ve never been lucky enough to try out a Specialized Roubaix.

This post from Bikeradar  provides a comparison based on their reviews of both bikes (albeit from previous generations of both bikes). And for an actual bike review, you’d like to think they’ve ridden them extensively…

Which Should You Buy?

Here I must disappoint. I’m going to sit on the (carbon fibre) fence.

I have really enjoyed riding my Trek Domane this past six years. Many readers of this blog found it by reading my original ‘review’ of the bike. Almost every comment or email I’ve received about it has been positive.

That said, I (obviously) covet a nice Specialized Roubaix. I’m sure it’s also an excellent choice.

So it looks like if you’re in the market for a new endurance bike (and no cyclist is truly out of the market for a new bike), you’ll have to test them both out. What a hassle…

Stay tuned for the next episode in this occasional Trek versus Specialized series.

In the meantime, do you own either the Domane or the Roubaix (or maybe both!)?

Let me know your views in the comments below.

Subscribe to Sportive Cyclist

I write entertaining articles about road cycling: gear reviews, training advice. All from a MAMIL perspective. Subscribe below and I will send you enjoyable and helpful cyclo-info straight to your inbox.

9 thoughts on “Trek Domane vs Specialized Roubaix: Which Is The Best Endurance Road Bike?”

Hello, At long last after38 years I have now switched from a vintage Koga Miyata Radonneur steel frame to Specialized Roubaix and I am amazed about the quality and smoothness of the ride. Yes, my steel steed was comfortable but some sections of tarmac roads we have here in Scotland are horrible, even on a steel bike. Imagine my astonishment when I rode the Roubaix (2016 model), Zipp Firecrest303 carbon wheels, on these roads and they just became smoother and less harsh. I always thought that carbon is harsh but in the right configuration it is marvelous, not to mention the nearly 9kg in weight saving.

I have a 2016 Specialized Roubaix SL4 Elite Disc, and it is the most comfortable bike I’ve ever ridden. When I was buying in 2016 I got my shortlist down to the Domane and Roubaix. Test rode both, and couldn’t separate them for ride quality and comfort. It eventually came down to price, with the Roubaix being £50 less. On saying that, I’m heading back to the ride quality of steel in a few weeks time, with a Mason Resolution 2 on order. So, if anybody fancies a well looked after Roubaix…? 😂

Thanks for the info. Im still riding my 2013 domane 500 series as well. But thinking it’s time for disc brakes. You didn’t mention electronic shifters either ! Maybe time for that info as well !

Have been following you for a while, always find you entertaining and informative. I wrote off my beloved 2015 domane disc in a ‘night time chain gang vs pothole’ incident (as well doing a number on my right wrist, which is now part bone, part titanium). ( I am now banned from night riding by SWMBO). Bought a Mason Definition 2 with Di2, based on the reviews and an hours ride from their base on the South Coast. But we’ve never ‘gelled’. It gives me neither the comfort nor the speed of the domane. It also feels quite harsh up front, which is not good for my often painful wrist, so the new domane is an itch I think I’ll have to scratch. Looking at a sale 2020 SL 7 with Force eTap and carbon wheels at a bargain price. Never had eTap, but the reviews are excellent. A little nervous as I adore Di2, but almost certainly going to pull the trigger once I’ve had a ride.

Hi Glenn – did you go for another Domane in the end?

Hello Glenn, could you share more about your “wrist?” I just purchased the 2021 Roubaix Sport, after returning from an almost 30-year hiatus and riding, again, my 40 year old, too-big-for-me Fuji Flair. Riding the new bike, I brake entirely too hard and have jolted myself to where I hurt my right wrist (I am right-handed). Thanks in advance for your time and attention.

I’ve ridden a Trek Domane 4.3 since 2013 and recently purchased the Domane SL5. I’ve found the post very low in comparison so have flipped the stem, which has made me more upright. The Arvada saddle for me is creating a lot of pressure compared to my Affinity (no longer available) saddle on my 4.3. I’m therefore changing this to a Trek Versa and hope this will alleviate the problem. Still love my 4.3 and hopefully will enjoy my new SL5 as much once it’s sorted to my liking. The SL5 is my 4th Trek with the pride of my collection being the SL8 full Dura Ace Emonda.

The Affinity saddle is available for a bargain basement price of $75 (carbon rails too). I picked one up for my Trek Fuel and it is the most comfortable saddle I have tried. Search “overstock” on trek’s website. https://www.trekbikes.com/us/en_US/equipment/cycling-components/factory-overstock/bontrager-affinity-pro-carbon-factory-overstock-bike-saddle/p/24630/?colorCode=white

I had the domane 4.3 for many years, great bike. Now I went for the domane sl7 2021 with di2. I love it!

I did my first bike race at 315km. What a comfort!

Leave a comment Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

Trek FX Vs. Verve: Complete Comparison! [2024 Update]

October 16, 2022

Erik Bassett

Last updated: January 13th, 2024

The Trek FX, FX Sport, and Verve are fun and practical hybrids with a nice range of spec levels.

All three series are appropriate for riding in roughly the same situations : mostly pavement, at a non-racing pace, with some gravel or well-kept trails thrown in.

Riding posture is the biggest practical difference. The FX and FX Sport prioritize efficiency whereas the Verve prioritizes comfort —something I’ll cover at length below. That’s not to say the FX is uncomfortable or the Verve is slow. Rather, they have some geometry and component differences that tilt the balance one way or the other.

This guide will cover what stands out to me in terms of value, suitability, or overall riding experience, so you can find the right model for you .

This article might contain affiliate links. As a member of programs including Amazon Associates, I earn from qualifying purchases.

Trek Verve, FX & FX Sport compared

Verve for relaxed, everyday riding & commuting.

The Verve series has more upright posture, slightly swept-back handlebars, and wider tires that hint at traditional city bikes. Consider the Verve if you like the concept of a classic Dutch bike , but need something much lighter, livelier, and more affordable.

It’s a terrifically practical bike, and livelier than any beach cruiser, but perhaps still too relaxed to satisfy performance-oriented riders.

FX for sportier riding & commuting

The FX models use slightly aggressive, forward-leaning posture that’s more efficient and nimble. If you ride for sport as much as transportation, or you need more nimble handling for hectic downtown traffic, then you should feel at home on an FX.

Posture is moderately forward-leaning, as on a mountain bike. Most riders find that pleasant enough, but it won’t feel as relaxed and comfortable as the Verve.

FX Sport for all-out speed (or just enjoying the best)

Finally, if what gets you excited is an ultra-light flat-bar road bike for chasing PRs and even venturing onto some gravel , then the FX Sport (one of today’s lightest hybrids ) might be right up your alley.

It would be a top-tier commuter…but the lack of rack mounts reduces its utility.

My quick picks

The FX 1 and Verve 1 are terrific budget options —not just within the Trek range, but overall. The more relaxed, comfy Verve and the livelier-feeling FX have long been my favorite affordable hybrids on the market.

Rather than flashy components or cutting-edge materials, your money buys a reliable and versatile bike that’s easy to upgrade if you like , but will keep most riders happy off the shelf.

But unlike cheap-o Target bikes , they’re from a supremely reputable brand that’s sold (and serviced) worldwide.

If weight is a goal and budget’s not, then the FX Sport 6 has nearly all the lightweight goodies money can buy. By my reckoning, it’s the third-lightest hybrid around, losing out to Specialized and Canyon by only a pound or so. It adds a grand onto the already high price tags of the FX 4 and 5…but if you’re looking for the best , then simply buying it is usually more satisfying than going halfway.

Finally, if you have the budget for thoughtful upgrades but aren’t keen to go all out, then the Verve 3 and FX 3 are the best value . Both have meaningful drivetrain and brake upgrades over their cheaper variations.

Frame and fork

The FX line shares an aluminum frame made of Trek’s proprietary Alpha Gold alloy. The FX 2 and 3 add internal cable routing, which is a nice aesthetic touch that’s worth the mild headache when it comes time to replace cables.

Forks do differ, with steel on the FX 1, aluminum on the FX 2, and carbon on the FX 3. Carbon’s obviously the lightest, and in my general experience, it provides the best vibration dampening of the three: better than aluminum, and generally better than entry-level steel. Take that with a grain of salt, since I haven’t been able to test all three FX variations side-by-side.

The FX Sport uses an identical carbon frame and fork across the line.

Finally, the Verve line also shares an aluminum frame, and the Verve 2 and 3 offer a lighter aluminum fork compared to steel on the Verve 1.

Notes on weight

Weight varies by size, but you can expect:

• Verve: 30–32 lbs
• FX 1 and 2: 26–27 lbs
• FX 3: 25 lbs
• FX Sport 4 and 5: 22–24 lbs
• FX Sport 6: < 21 lbs

Pragmatically, bicycle weight matters far less than marketers (and many cyclists) would have you believe. Wheel and tire weight does affect acceleration, since it’s exponentially more work to start mass rotating versus merely moving forward. Otherwise, unless you’re regularly picking the bike up, a couple pounds in the frame and fork won’t make a meaningful difference while riding.

Granted, more upright bikes like the Verve will feel slower since their posture is less aerodynamic. They also happen to weigh more, but it’s just a coincidence. Any perceived sluggishness has more to do with posture and less to do with weight . (They’re also more comfortable, so less efficiency is just a trade-off, not necessarily a problem.)

Finally, before paying top dollar to shave weight, consider what racks, accessories, and cargo you’ll carry . A few pounds’ difference between two bikes—say, the FX 1 and FX Sport 4—might seem like a lot, but it’s a tiny percentage by the time you throw on a pannier and baskets full of groceries.

Geometry & sizing comparison

I find that geometry affects ride quality at least as much as the frame and fork material or weight. You can tweak it with seatpost and bar/stem changes, but you can’t fundamentally change it, so geometry might be the single most important thing to understand when comparing bikes.

Verve geometry: long & relaxed with a convenient step-through option

The Verve is available with a step-over or step-through frame, with sizes S-XL for riders approximately 5’1″ to 6’6″. The step-through version adds an XS option for riders down to 4’10”, so there’s an option for probably 99% of adults and older children.

I applaud Trek for not calling the Verve step-through a “women’s” bike. Men—myself included—often ride step-through frames for the sheer convenience of mounting and dismounting with cargo or a child on the back!

The Verve has noticeably longer chainstays and a slightly longer effective top tube than the FX/FX Sport or most other hybrids. I find that these longer-wheelbase bikes have a smoother, predictable feel in general. Length only becomes a liability in racing situations or technical singletrack, but those are far outside the intended use of these and all other hybrids.

The Verve’s 70.5° head tube angle is about one degree slacker than most hybrids’. This cooperates with the long wheelbase and taller front end to make steering feel a bit steadier , especially at high speeds.

The seat tube angle varies by size (that’s typical) but is a bit more relaxed than on other hybrids. That helps maintain a decent hip angle relative to the higher handlebars.

FX geometry: a quintessential, versatile hybrid

The FX comes in step-over or “stagger” (low-step) options. Both come in sizes S-L for riders 5’1″-6’1″, and the step-over FX extends to XXL for those between 6’1″ and 6’8″.

If you were to write down the archetypical hybrid bike geometry, it would probably resemble that of the FX. Everything, from head and seat tube angle (74° and 71.5° on a medium) to the 450mm chainstays, are more relaxed and generous than on a road bike , but still lively enough for weaving through traffic (if that’s your thing).

Some low-step sizes get 1° slacker head tubes than their step-over counterparts, but that isolated difference won’t be too apparent, and certainly won’t be a game-changer.

The low-step FX Stagger models are not true step-through frames. They’ve got far more standover clearance, but aren’t that much easier to swing a leg through. If you want low clearance for getting on and off, then go with the low-step Verve instead.

FX Sport geometry: a surprisingly steady feel

As for the FX Sport, it’s strictly a step-over design , in keeping with practically all high-performance carbon bikes. Sizes XS-XL cover riders from 4’10”-6’6″, so there’s a super-light option for almost everybody—or at least everybody with the cash.

You might expect the FX Sport to share the steep angles and snappy feel of most road bikes, but that’s not the case. Its geometry is nearly identical to that of the regular FX, differing by only a few millimeters here and half a degree there.

I’m of the opinion that aggressive road-bike geometry is overrated in general, and downright undesirable with flat bars (due to their greater leverage and torque), so the FX Sport’s geometry should still keep aggressive riders happy without introducing quirks or unpredictability for less intense ones.

You can always upgrade drivetrain parts (subject to some compatibility limits), but it’s still nice to have good value and plenty of gear range out of the box.

Rather than rehashing the manufacturer’s specs, I’ll draw your attention to a few notable points.

Gear range comparison

Below are the minimum and maximum gear inches for all FX, FX Sport, and Verve models. I’ve also noted the gear configuration, although overall range (high gear inches minus low gear inches) is what really counts.

In my experience, a low under 30″ and a high above 90″ should let you pedal up and down almost anything you’ll tackle on a hybrid. All models check those boxes. To learn how to interpret these numbers, check out this guide to hybrid bike gearing .

Derailleurs

All FX and Verve models use Shimano derailleurs , but from significantly different tiers . I’m glad to see that Trek skips the entry-level Tourney rear derailleur altogether. While serviceable, I always perceive it as less crisp than its slightly upgraded siblings. (It’s manageable as a front derailleur, where shifting is less frequent and needs less precision, so the front Tourney on the Verve 1 + 2 and FX 1 doesn’t bother me.)

I believe the Acera rear derailleur on the FX 3 and Verve 3 makes a meaningful difference from the Altus on the 1-tier bikes…but not enough to justify an upgrade by itself.

On rough terrain, the FX 3’s and FX Sport 4’s clutch-equipped Deore will make a significant difference in shifting precision. The FX Sport 5’s and 6’s GRX (also clutch-equipped) is an appreciable bump up again, but not the night-and-day difference of going from no clutch to clutch in the first place.

Wheels & tires

The Verve 3, FX 3, and all FX Sports come with tubeless-ready rims . It’s still possible to set up conventional rims as tubeless, but it’s a less painful process when they’re designed for that in the first place. Rims are alloy across the board, except for the FX Sport 6, where your (considerable) money buys a carbon set from Bontrager.

The Verve comes with 700C x 45mm tires, which is also the maximum width with or without fenders. That’s a terrific size for city riding: plenty of air volume to absorb all reasonable bumps and chatter, but not so bulky as to slow you down. Sensitive riders might perceive a suppler feel from the Verve 3’s 60 tpi casings (versus 30 tpi on the 1 and 2), but I suspect few will notice and fewer will care.

The FX takes 700C tires up to 38mm without fenders or 35mm with fenders. That’s good clearance for most paved riding, although I’d like to see a few more millimeters to clear fatter tires for rougher city streets and occasional gravel adventures. The FX 3 comes with 32mm tires, as opposed to 35mm on the 1 and 2, which is on the skinner side of what I find appropriate for a modern hybrid.

The FX Sport has stock 700C x 40mm tires. That’s the maximum width with fenders. If you choose to skip fenders, then the tire clearance bumps up to 42mm—nearly as wide as the Verve! That’s quite a bit for such a speedy, pavement-focused, so you’ll be covered for any halfway-decent city street, most gravel routes, and even some gentler trails.

Other components

Beyond what I’ve already covered, you’re likeliest to notice and care about differences in braking and in the feel of the cockpit (namely, the bar and stem).

All FX, FX Sport, and Verve models (except the FX 1) have disc brakes . Hybrids generally don’t need disc brakes unless extreme terrain, sticky mud, or massive cargo are on the agenda. Still, they’re nice to have. (I’m partial to the power and modulation of hydraulic discs over entry-level mechanical. However, high-end mechanical disc brands like Avid and TRP are terrific for anything shy of extreme mountain biking.)

The FX 1’s Tektro V-brakes work terrifically when properly set up. I’ve owned many pairs on many different bikes over the years, and actually find them more powerful and better-modulating than entry-level mechanical discs.

The Verve 1 has Tektro mechanical disc brakes . They’re par for the course in this price range: definitely on the bottom end of usable mechanical discs, and less powerful than good rim brakes, but at least consistent in wet weather. Once the pads bed in with use, they’re serviceable as long as you keep them in meticulous adjustment. Consider upgrading to TRP or Avid mechanical discs if you find them inadequate…although it’s probably cheaper (and definitely easier) just to buy the hydro-equipped Verve 2 in the first place.

You’ll find hydraulic Tektros on the mid-tier Verve 2 and FX 2, and a roughly similar Promax model on the FX Sport 4. I’m not enamored of them, but they’re at least a worthwhile step up from mechanical Tektros. For my money, things start to get good with the Shimano M2xx-series hydros on the Verve 3, FX 3, and FX Sport 5 and 6.

The FX 3, Verve 3, and all FX Sport models use Bontrager IsoZone bars and grips , meaning they include foam inserts to dampen road vibrations. I strongly prefer locking grips like these, since they stay in place perfectly and are easy to remove/replace.

The IsoZone inserts are a simple (and effective) alternative to the suspension stems that some competitors offer. They do not replace proper suspension forks on rough trails, but suspension isn’t necessary for commuting, cruising, fitness riding, or most other uses that hybrids are intended for.

The FX 2 and 3 and all FX Sports have 15mm of handlebar rise and very little sweep (I’d eyeball it at ~10°). The FX 1’s 30mm of rise will feel just a hair more relaxed .

The Verve has a bit more rise—about 45mm depending on the version—but I estimate closer to 30° of sweep for a more neutral wrist angle. You’ll also get a quill stem, which does feel less stiff under power, but is far easier to raise/lower and helps further dampen vibrations.

So, what’s the better cockpit configuration? I’m partial to swept-back handlebars for any and all paved riding, so in my book, the Verve wins for posture and comfort . The wrist angle is simply more pleasant, and I don’t notice a significant difference in control.

Accessories & mounts

Finally, a few details can make it easy or hard to configure your bike for commuting or other practical uses.

Blendr mount compatibility

Besides the FX 1 and Verve 1, all models have Blendr-compatible stems . It’s a nifty mounting system that attaches one or two accessories (like a headlight, phone, and/or computer) directly to the stem rather than cluttering the handlebars.

But given how easily those things mount on their own—usually with a 1/2″- or 1″-wide rubber strap—I’ve never seen the need for a Blendr stem on my personal bikes.

Racks & fenders

All models have fender mounts , so they’re a cinch to equip for year-round rides.

As for luggage, the FX and Verve all include rack mounts . Racks are useful on their own, and perhaps more importantly, they allow for panniers, which are far more comfortable than a backpack and don’t impact handling like a basket.

Unfortunately, the all-carbon FX Sport line skips the rack mounts , so luggage options are essentially limited to a backpack. (You can roll the dice and mount a basket or rack with P-clamps…but carbon frames and forks aren’t always meant to handle forces from those angles.)

Common questions & comparison about the FX & Verve

Should i get the trek verve vs. dual sport.

They differ quite a bit in posture, but not much in performance. Consider the Gen 5 Dual Sport if you’ll regularly ride on dirt/gravel, and prefer a sportier feel than the upright Verve. Conversely, get the Verve if you prefer more upright posture or you need a step-through frame.

I would avoid the Gen 4 Dual Sport. It had a heavy, poorly performing suspension fork, and its 40 mm tires were a bit narrow for off-road use. I’ve recommend the Gen 5 Dual Sport only because Trek switched to a rigid fork and bumped up to 2.0″ (~50 mm) tires.

How about the Dual Sport vs. FX?

The FX and the Gen 5 Dual Sport have substantially similar riding posture, so it’s a question of how much time you’ll spend on pavement versus dirt/gravel.

If you stick to pavement and you like a sportier feel, then the FX still makes sense. Otherwise, if you spend significant time off-road or just want a smoother feel over nasty pavement, the Dual Sport is a terrific option.

Note that between the two, only the FX has a step-through option.

Is it worth upgrading to the Trek Verve 2 vs. Verve 1?

If the extra $200 isn’t a big deal, then I recommend the Verve 2 over the Verve 1. The biggest upgrade is hydraulic disc brakes, which greatly outperform mechanical at this price range. And the Shimano Altus rear derailleur feels modestly but appreciably crisper than the budget Shimano Tourney—especially when shifting over bumpy ground.

The Verve 2 also adds a suspension seatpost, but I wouldn’t let that guide the decision. In my experience, sprung saddles are preferable on upright bikes since they don’t affect leg extension.

Is the Trek FX 1 or FX 2 a better deal?

Budget permitting, I’d pick the FX 2. I staunchly believe the FX 1 is a great value at its price point, but those with extra cash will appreciate the FX 2’s hydraulic disc brakes (vs. rim), slightly more dependable Shimano Altus M2000 derailleur (vs. Altus M210), and nearly two-pound weight savings.

And what about the FX 2 vs. FX 3?

The differences between the FX 2 and FX 3 are more marginal. If price is a concern at all, then stick with the FX 2 and use the savings for apparel or accessories .

To be fair, the FX 3 has a couple of legitimately nice upgrades that I don’t mind paying for. It swaps the aluminum fork for vibration-dampening carbon fiber, and uses a more modern 1×10 drivetrain with the terrific Shimano Deore rear derailleur. But those are incremental improvements, not game-changers.

Summary: Trek FX vs. Verve

I consider all FX, FX Sport, and Verve models good examples of their style and price point . You may find arguably better specs for your money with some direct-to-consumer brands (I’m partial to Priority and Brooklyn) but you’ll sacrifice the convenience and easy test-rides of mainstream bike-shop brands.

The FX and Verve are both terrific for commuting, leisure riding, and fitness/training. Choosing between them comes down to maximizing speed versus comfort . They’re actually more similar than not, but the Verve will keep you slightly more upright. That’s easier on the back and neck, but can feel slow when accelerating or battling a headwind. Don’t worry: the Verve is far from a beach cruiser , so you’ll have no problem climbing hills or navigating tight spaces.

The FX and FX Sport will encourage moderately forward-leaning posture (albeit less aggressive than any drop-bar road bike), which most of us will find more efficient but also less comfortable.

I consider the Verve 3 and FX 3 the best value . On a tighter budget, the Verve 1 and FX 1 remain outstanding choices , especially if you won’t encounter steep hills and foul weather where high-end disc brakes really count. If money’s no object—and you can live without rack mounts—then the FX Sport 6 spares almost no expense to create a snappy and featherweight package.

Explore Jobs

• Jobs Near Me
• Remote Jobs
• Full Time Jobs
• Part Time Jobs
• Entry Level Jobs
• Work From Home Jobs

Find Specific Jobs

• $15 Per Hour Jobs
• $20 Per Hour Jobs
• Hiring Immediately Jobs
• High School Jobs
• H1b Visa Jobs

Explore Careers

• Business And Financial
• Architecture And Engineering
• Computer And Mathematical

Explore Professions

• What They Do
• Certifications
• Demographics

Best Companies

• Health Care
• Fortune 500

Explore Companies

• CEO And Executies
• Resume Builder
• Career Advice
• Explore Majors
• Questions And Answers
• Interview Questions

Trek Bicycle competitors

Competitors

Trek Bicycle main competitors are Cannondale, WestPoint Home, and Benjamin Moore.

Competitor Summary . See how Trek Bicycle compares to its main competitors:

• Coty has the most employees (20,000).
• Employees at Cannondale earn more than most of the competitors, with an average yearly salary of $58,933.

Trek Bicycle vs competitors

Trek bicycle competitors jobs, trek bicycle jobs openings vs similar companies, trek bicycle remote jobs.

Rate Trek Bicycle's competitiveness in the market.

Trek Bicycle salaries vs Competitors

Compare trek bicycle salaries vs competitors, compare trek bicycle job title salaries vs competitors, trek bicycle jobs, trek bicycle demographics vs competitors, compare gender at trek bicycle vs competitors, compare race at trek bicycle vs competitors, trek bicycle and similar companies ceos.

Sue Y. Nabi is the Chief Executive Officer of Coty Inc. She is a true veteran in the beauty space, with roughly 30 years of experience across key strategic focus areas for Coty. This includes a track record of success across the mass and luxury channels, and across the core fragrances, color cosmetics, and skincare categories, as well as successful brand building across key international markets. Born in Algeria, Nabi has an Advanced Master's degree in Marketing Management from ESSEC (Paris Business School) and an engineering degree in Agronomy and Environment. She began her career at L’Oréal in 1993, where her passion, ambition and talent for bringing brands alive established her reputation for exceptional leadership and innovation. In 2004, Nabi was promoted to General Manager of L’Oréal France, managing a business of more than 400 million euros in turnover with a team of over 400 people. In mid-2005, she was named the youngest ever president of L’Oréal worldwide. Her tenure saw the L’Oréal brand’s strongest years of growth in the decade - reaching the 4 billion euros mark in 2009 - while her decision to evolve the slogan of L’Oréal Paris to “because we’re worth it” cemented the brand’s commitment to inclusivity. During this period Nabi was named Manager of the Year in 2008 by Cosmétique Magazine and won the Prix d’Excellence Marie Claire award 3 years in a row. In 2009, Nabi was tasked with revitalizing Lancôme. The same recipe for success was applied to make Lancôme the brand of happiness, resulting in three years of up to double-digit growth and a record turnover of €3.2b. During her tenure Nabi pioneered the launch of the most successful fragrance of the last twenty years - 'La Vie est Belle' - which is now the second best-selling prestige perfume in the world. Nabi also oversaw the launch of global blockbusters including Génifique Light Pearl, Teint Miracle, Hypnose Doll Eyes Mascara, Énergie de Vie, Visionnaire and Absolue L’Extrait skincare during her time at Lancôme. In 2014, Nabi left L’Oréal to co-found a new brand and product range with Nicolas Vu, which they in 2017. Green, clean, vegan and genderless, Orveda delivered an empowering, new-age skincare range that is based on the science of glow and working with skin, not against it. Since Nabi joined Coty, Nicolas Vu is the CEO of Orveda. The products are sold on Orveda.com and the brand is present in the most beautiful points of sale or luxury spas and medi-spas in the UK, France, USA, Switzerland, Mexico, Germany, Italy and Net-A-Porter.

Rick James is a Chairman/CEO at Metal Technologies.

Joseph Montgomery is a Chairman/President/CEO at Cannondale.

Willard Speakman III is a Chairman/CEO at Speakman Co.

Trek Bicycle Competitors FAQs

What is trek bicycle's biggest competitor, search for jobs.

• Cannondale Competitors
• Felt Bicycles Competitors
• Metal Technologies Competitors
• Kongsberg Automotive Competitors
• Benjamin Moore Competitors
• Tyco Fire Products Competitors
• Blue Bird Competitors
• Monogram International Competitors
• Coty Competitors
• Earth Friendly Products Competitors
• LaSalle Bristol Competitors
• ConTech Lighting Competitors
• Lightolier Competitors
• AXOR Competitors
• G.L. Huyett Competitors
• Cannondale Overview
• Felt Bicycles Overview
• Metal Technologies Overview
• Kongsberg Automotive Overview
• Benjamin Moore Overview
• Tyco Fire Products Overview
• Blue Bird Overview
• Monogram International Overview
• Coty Overview
• Earth Friendly Products Overview
• LaSalle Bristol Overview
• ConTech Lighting Overview
• Lightolier Overview
• AXOR Overview
• G.L. Huyett Overview
• Jobs at Metal Technologies
• Jobs at Benjamin Moore
• Jobs at Blue Bird
• Jobs at Coty
• Jobs at Earth Friendly Products
• Account Executive
• Administrative Assistant
• Call Center Representative
• Certified Nursing Assistant
• Company Driver
• Customer Service Representative
• Data Analyst
• Data Entry Clerk
• Data Entry Specialist
• Delivery Driver
• Insurance Sales Agent
• Licensed Practical Nurse
• Life Insurance Agent
• Waterloo, WI
• Trek Bicycle
• Trek Bicycle Competitors

Cannondale Quick 3 vs Trek FX3 Disc

In this article, we’re taking a look at two popular mid-range commuter/fitness bikes from two reputable manufacturers,  Cannondale and Trek. They are the Cannondale Quick 3 and the Trek FX3 Disc.

Both of these bikes are aimed at fitness enthusiasts and commuters, who are looking for a reliable new bike and are willing to spend more than the entry-level offerings in exchange for better, more reliable components.

Let’s start with the price, which is pretty similar. The FX3 Disc comes in at $899.99, while the Quick 3 sets you back $925 . The extra 25 dollars isn’t a significant difference to decide for one or the other.

They are also pretty similar in the choice of materials . Both of them come with aluminum frames and carbon forks. It’s nice to see internal cable routing on both bikes, which results in cleaner-looking lines.

FX 3 Disc is a versatile hybrid bike that's primed for performance, comfort, and utility. It has features like a lightweight aluminum frame, a carbon fork, and powerful disc brakes that stop in any weather. It's a commuting pro if you want it to be, or the perfect fitness companion on pavement and rail trails.

Both the Trek and the Cannondale come in 5 sizes , and range from small to extra-extra large, but there is a significant difference in the maximum weight each of these bikes can carry.

The Trek has a maximum total weight limit of 300 lbs (136 kg), which includes the combined weight of the bike, rider and the cargo, while the Cannondale can carry a 300 lb (136 kg) rider and 30 lbs (14 kg) of luggage not including the bike’s own weight . This is good news for heavy riders looking for a bike in the XXL range.

Both bikes are available in women’s versions , which means different color variations and in the case of the FX3, it also has women specific saddles for better comfort for female riders. Both the Quick 3 and the FX3 are also availabe with low step through frames in case you don’t fancy throwing your legs over the rear wheel and the saddle when getting on and off the bike.

Sadly, if you opt for other than the standard Cannondale version, you’re going to pay a higher price. Here’s a comparison chart of the differences.

In terms of groupsets and other components used, both bicycles are quite comparable.

They both come with 9 speed cassettes and double cranks, resulting in a wide gear ratio, but with a difference offered in the lowest and highest gear ratios .

Cannondale’s highest gear ratio is going to provide a faster speed at the same pedal revolution , concentrating on faster speeds, while Trek’s more focused on the lower gear ratios, and helps tackle steep hills better .

The Cannondale Quick 3 uses Shimano Altus shifters, Acera front derailleurs and Alivio rear derailleurs. For brakes it uses Tektro HD-R280 hydraulic disc brakes with 160mm rotors at the front and 140mm rotors at the rear. Even with the smaller rotor at the rear, it provides sufficient stopping power for its intended use.

The Trek FX 3 is equiped with Shimano components both for the brakes and the for the drive train. It uses Shimano Acera shifters and front derailleurs and Alivio rear derailleurs . It’s not a huge upgrade over the Quick 3, but it’s nice to see a higher end shifter for less price. The FX 3 uses Shimano MT201 hydraulic disc brakes with 160mm rotors both at the front and the rear, which again, is slighly better than the Cannondale offering.

In terms of weight, the Cannondale manages to keep it under 25 lbs, while the FX 3 comes in at just under 26 lbs . It’s not a huge difference, especially for the type of use these bicycles are intended, but it’s always nice to have a lighter bike, especially if you need to carry it up the stairs.

One area where Cannondale offers a bit more comfort over the Trek is the tire size, which is 35 mm against the 32 mm of the latter . The 3 mm difference translates into a smoother riding experience on uneven roads, and it makes getting up curbs and hitting potholes a little safer, reducing the chance of a pinch flat.

I also love that Cannondale offers Schwalbe Spicer tires with reflective strips on the wheels . They offer excellent puncture resistance (number 5 on Schwalbe’s scale, which is on par with the Schwalbe Marathon, and runs up to 7). These tires perform very well on urban roads, but they don’t offer much traction off road.

The Trek comes with their own manufactured Bontrager H2 tires, which aren’t terrible, but they definitely offer significantly less puncture protection compared to the Schwalbe. If you want to eliminate the chance of flats , this is something you should probably upgrade as soon as you get the bike.

Both bicycles have mouting points for two bottle cages, fenders and racks, and the FX 3 also includes additional eyelets on the front fork.

Ergonomic grips and comfortable saddles are included in both packages . These are great for getting started, and if you spend a lot of time in the saddle, you may want to upgrade those down the line.

Both bikes come with basic plastic pedals . The Cannondale is a little more versatile, while the Trek is more geared toward city riding. Again, they are fine just to get started, but you will probably want to replace them if you use your bike a lot.

There are two additional nice details from Cannondale, which are not present in the Trek.

One of them is the inclusion of their integrated wheel sensor , which they developed together with Garmin. It pairs up with your smartphone, and provides you information about your bicycle, service intervals, speed and other useful details. Although it’s not essential, but it’s certainly nice to have.

The second bonus is that the Cannondale paintjob includes 360° reflective details, which makes it super safe to ride at night because it’s virtually impossible to not notice. This, combined with the reflective strip of the Schwalbe tires, is a winning duo.

When it comes to comfort and bike geometry, there are lots of similarities, and some differences too. Let’s see some of them taking the L size bikes in from both manufacturers.

The Quick 3 has a slightly longer wheelbase, which translates to a marginally more stable ride, while the FX 3 is a little easier to steer and turn.

The FX 3 has a slightly longer chainstay, which means that you may be less likely to bump into heel clearence issues if you use a pannier than you are with the Quick 3. The difference is only 15mm, but sometimes that can be the difference between hitting a pannier or not.

The Cannondale is slightly more oriented towards speed, while the FX 3 is a more balanced, and a slightly more upright bicycle .

These differences are quite subtle and probably not very noticeable to a beginner, but one would notice the difference if he sat on one after using the other one for some time

Which is the better choice for you?

If you are committed to spending a lot of time in the saddle, and you want to ride at fast speeds, you should probably opt for the Cannondale Quick 3. It is better for performance riding and offers some other benefits, such as great puncture protection and the integrated wheel sensor. If you weigh more than 263 lbs (120 kg), and you intend to carry some stuff with you, the Cannondale is the only option you have between these two.

If you’re not too concerned about a marginally higher top speed, and you’re looking for a more upright bicycle that can get you up steeper hills, and has slightly better components, the FX 3 won’t disappoint.

Either way you choose, the main thing is to get on your bike and ride it often. The best bike you can own is the one that makes you want to ride it every time you see it.

Happy pedaling!

Sam Benkoczy

Hi, I'm Sam. I own and maintain 6 e-bikes, 15 regular bikes (road bikes, folding bikes, hybrid bikes, city bikes among others). I learned about bikes from my local bike mechanic as well as from bike maintenance courses. I love being out there in the saddle, and using my bike as a practical means of transportation. You can also find me on my YouTube channel at youtube.com/bikecommuterhero Say hi to me at [email protected].

Recent Posts

What Bicycles Would Superheroes Ride?

Do you love bicycles and superheroes? Have you ever wondered what bicycle your favorite superhero would be riding? I asked AI to help me come up with bicycle ideas for vairous superheroes, and to...

HeyBike Sola Hands-on Review

I’m not going to beat around the bush. The Heybike Sola is SHOCKINGLY cheap. This is an electric commuter bike that is currently on sale for less than the price of most regular, non-electric...

PLEASE NOTE

• Experience Drives
• LAND ROVER EXPERIENCE CENTERS
• FACTORY TOURS
• ADVENTURE TRAVEL
• LAND ROVER STORIES
• EVENT & SPONSORSHIP
• DEFENDER SERVICE AWARDS
• DESTINATION DEFENDER
• RANGE ROVER HOUSE
• Deer Valley
• DEFENDER SURF LODGE
• REBELLE RALLY

TRĕK OFF-ROAD COMPETITION

CHALLENGING THE OFF-ROAD AND ADVENTURE SKILLS OF RETAILER EMPLOYEES SINCE 1996

CHALLENGES FACED, OBSTACLES OVERCOME, ABILITIES PUT TO THE TEST

This year’s competition was held in Hidden Falls Adventure Park in Marble Falls, Texas, featuring 109 teams of Land Rover Retailer employees from across the U.S. and Canada. Each team faced head-to-head and team challenges in identically customized 2023 Land Rover Defender 130 vehicles. The top 10 teams from each wave of the competition will return for the TRĕK 2023 Finals, where the overall winner will be crowned at Destination Defender.

FOR OVERSIZED ADVENTURES

Based on the new eight-seat 2023 Defender 130 P400 SE, this year's Defender TRĕK vehicles feature a bespoke matte black wrap with the TRĕK logo in Carbon Black on the doors and custom TRĕK interior and exterior badging. All-terrain equipment includes off-road tires, Remote Control Electric Winch, new LED lighting, a Hitch-Mounted Hi-Lift jack, a suspension lift, roof-mounted Tread Pro traction boards and more.

A LEGACY SHARED

“The TRĕK competition allows our retailers to understand the ‘Embrace the Impossible’ ethos of the Defender brand. Passing down knowledge gained from years of off-road experience to our retailers and, ultimately, our clients is something we cherish each year."

- Charlotte Blank, U.S. Chief Marketing Officer, Jaguar Land Rover North America

What legends are made of.

100 teams of Retailer employees from across North America will gather in Manchester, Vermont, to compete in the 2022 TReK regional trials. Inspired by the original Camel Trophy competition, TReK tests some of the best experts across the U.S. and Canada as they put their abilities to the test in off-road driving, navigation and team collaboration behind the wheel of a custom Defender vehicle.

CREATED FOR CAPABILITY

The Defender 110 TReK vehicle continues the Defender legacy of overcoming the unpaved pathway. Each vehicle is customized with accessories such as Electric Winch 25 , Roof Mounted Tent, Roof Mounted Awning, Side-Mounted Water Storage System, Solar Panel and Auxiliary Battery, plus additional features all created to take on some of the toughest demands.

AN EPIC EXPERIENCE

“As we look ahead, we are thrilled to bring back the TReK competition for another year putting the capability of the Defender and our retailers’ skills to the test. This competition lets us engage with our retailers while letting them embrace and experience firsthand what the Land Rover brand means.”

-  Joe Eberhardt, President and CEO, Jaguar Land Rover North America

70 teams, 70 defenders.

From September 16–26, 2021, 70 teams of Land Rover Retailer employees from across North America competed in the TRĕK qualifying trials. The courage of competitors and the capability of their custom 2022 Land Rover Defender SUVs were tested with off-road driving events, navigation games and team challenges throughout the week.

LAND ROVER AMBASSADOR LINDSEY VONN TESTS HER ADVENTURE SKILLS

This year, champion skier and Land Rover Ambassador Lindsey Vonn used her athleticism and outdoor adventure skills to take on some of the toughest challenges alongside Land Rover Retailers.

CAPABLE OF GREAT THINGS

Each team drove the new 2022 Defender 110 S P300, equipped with 18” Steel Wheels, Off-Road Pack, Towing Pack and a range of accessories to aid them in the competition. The most capable Land Rover vehicle ever produced, the Defender is up to any challenge.

THE FIRST TREK COMPETITION IN 17 YEARS

Originally established in 1996 after the legendary Camel Trophy, the TReK Off-Road Competition was revitalized for the first time in 17 years to celebrate the return of the Defender family to the Land Rover brand. The competition started at The Biltmore Estate in Asheville, North Carolina and continued on to Palm Springs for the finals.

53 TEAMS, 53 DEFENDERS

53 teams of Land Rover Retailer employees from across the U.S. and Canada participated in the re-introduced off-road competition last year to celebrate the return of the Land Rover Defender.

MADE FOR ADVENTURE

Each team drove a Defender 110 SE P400, equipped with 20” Wheels, Explorer Pack and a range of accessories to help them complete challenges. There’s no task too big for the Defender.

2023 WINNERS

No stranger to the TRĕK event, the Defender was tested to its limits in October 2023 as finalists competed for victory across parts of Texas. The event was a testament to the tenacity and resilience of every Land Rover Retailer involved.

First Place : Land Rover Tulsa (Tulsa, Oklahoma)

Second Place : Land Rover Mission Viejo (Mission Viejo, California)

Third Place : Land Rover Denver (Denver, Colorado)

LINDSEY'S TReK EXPERIENCE FROM DOWNHILL TO OFF-ROAD

Lindsey Vonn, famed Olympic ski racer and Land Rover brand ambassador, is a fierce competitor by nature and she had an unforgettable experience at the 2021 Land Rover TRĕK competition. Her team also featured ski mountaineer Hilaree Nelson and adventure journalist Alyssa Roenigk. Follow their expedition through the Biltmore Estate.

EXPLORE OUR VEHICLES

Learn more about Land Rover vehicles

KEEP ME INFORMED

Sign up for all the latest Land Rover news

BOOK AN EXPERIENCE DAY

Experience all-terrain Land Rover capability firsthand

SCHEDULE A TEST DRIVE

Arrange an on-road test drive through your nearest Retailer

Trek Bikes - The world's best bikes and cycling gear

Shop TrekFest to save on bikes and gear! Get the deals

Online bike shopping made easy

Your perfect bike may already be in a store near you. Browse local inventory online for the fastest availability.

Upon arrival, your bike will be assembled by certified bicycle technicians and made ready to pick up or deliver to your home.

If you’re not in love with your bike within the first thirty days, we will take it back without any additional charges or hassle.

Your local bike shop has the knowledge, products, and expertise to help you get the most out of your new bike.

Back-to-back bike of the year

Slash - 2023 Bike of the Year

Fuel ex - 2022 bike of the year.

We’re a different kind of bike company

Pre-owned bikes, certified awesome by Trek

Red Barn Refresh, where pre-owned bikes get another chance to ride.

No time to waste

We’re changing the business of bikes

Trek is a 2023 Fortune 100 Best Company to Work For!

Looking for a great place to work.

Our mission Trek started in a small Wisconsin barn in 1976, but our founders always saw something bigger. Decades later, we're on a mission to make our world a better place to live and ride. We build only products we love, provide incredible hospitality to our customers, and change the world by getting more people on bikes.

Star Trek Fan Wants the Franchise to Clone One Thing From Star Wars

While Star Trek has always been the mainstay for TV science fiction, one fan online points out one thing it could borrow from the competition.

• Star Trek could learn from Star Wars' Andor series in terms of exploring complex dynamics in a dedicated manner on the small screen.
• Fans suggest a potential Star Trek spin-off focusing on the Cardassian occupation of Bajor or Vulcan-friendly Romulan rebels to add depth.
• Paramount's future plans for Star Trek are uncertain, but the franchise could benefit from a more focused, thematic approach like Star Wars.

While Star Trek has always been at the apex of the small screen’s science fiction offerings, one fan has taken to social media to highlight one show from another science fiction franchise that they think Paramount could learn a thing or two from.

Star Trek has been a mainstay of science fiction in households since its inception with the 1966 premiere of Star Trek: The Original Series, with series after series coming to the small screen after Star Trek ’s original series was canceled . While the franchise also had feature-length films early on in its history, the rebooted cinematic experience brought on by franchise guardians Paramount has put a much stronger focus on the films that the franchise has in modern times. This emphasis has somewhat obscured Star Trek’s position in the science fiction zeitgeist, moving it further away from franchises like Doctor Who and more towards another, more theatrically inclined franchise.

William Shatner Reveals One Condition To Reprise Role in Star Trek

While Star Trek fans are worried about the franchise bloating like Star Wars , one of the latter’s more well-received small-screen projects could potentially be a good thing for Star Trek to emulate. Reddit user theginjoints took to the r/startrek subreddit to propose an interesting idea for the franchise in a post titled “Would love to see an Andor type of show in Star Trek.” In the post, the user highlights their enjoyment of Star Wars: Andor, a prequel series to Rogue One that follows its titular character’s journey to that fateful point in galactic history. As a longtime Star Trek fan, theginjoints also highlighted the potential for a new series that explored the dissident/authoritarian bureaucracy dynamic that Andor did in the Star Trek universe.

In addition to liking the idea of Star Trek taking a page from Andor’ s book, theginjoints also had some interesting ideas on what dynamics could be explored within the existing canon. Their ideas include exploring the Cardassian occupation of Bajor from the perspective of the freedom fighters, military, and Obsidian Order, or alternatively, Vulcan-friendly Romulan rebels trying to avoid the Tal Shiar and the military. Failing that, the user also suggested that a new conflict on a planet the federation bureaucracy is not handling well could be interesting as well. This last bit is an interesting consideration and could tie into the desire for more Star Trek material showing the Federation’s early years .

Many fans were quick to point out that Star Trek has dealt with these themes before, a fact that the OP agrees with in an addendum to the post while specifying that their idea is less about the ideas behind Andor and more about the format and depth that it provides. Star Trek has features many conflicts with all sorts of dynamics, including complex ones like the faction-rife Dominion War story arc fans got to enjoy in Deep Space Nine. Thanks to this scale and variation, its inevitable that the franchise has touched on all sorts of conflicts over time, but never in the same dedicated way that a spin-off like Andor was able to capture. Part of the issue lies in Star Wars being a largely theatrical franchise with the occasional forays into shows always having a very focused, specific theme. This focus might be the biggest takeaway for Star Trek as it expands to more closely resemble the Lucasfilm crown jewel.

The idea is potentially one that could be useful to Paramount, as fans know very little about what’s going on with the franchise’s future plans. What is clear is that there are a lot of things in flux, such as the fact that a much-anticipated Star Trek: Picard follow-up series faces an uncertain future at the moment. Only time will tell what direction the execs at Paramount decide on and what sort of media will be produced from that mandate.

The Star Trek franchise is currently available to stream on Paramount+.

Star Trek is a space exploration franchise originally created by Gene Roddenberry. The series has spanned shows like The Original Series, The Next Generation, and Voyager. More recently, developer Scopely came out with Star Trek Fleet Command, a mobile title where you get to be captain of your own ship.

Star Trek: Discovery Season 5 Episode 2 Recap

Source: u/theginjoints|Reddit

Porsche Macan

Polestar says tesla is not the competition but porsche’s new macan ev is.

Polestar is not afraid to voice its opinion. The Swedish EV maker has called out industry leaders for their lack of progress with electric cars. Although often compared to Tesla, Polestar says the EV leader is not its rival. If anything, the new Porsche Macan EV is.

Tesla is not the competition

After Polestar became a standalone EV maker in 2017, Volvo said the brand would compete with Tesla and Mercedes-AMG with high-performance electric cars.

Fast-forward seven years, and the market has changed. Tesla sold 1.8 million EVs last year and another 386,810 vehicles in the first three months of 2024.

After slashing prices last year, Tesla’s cheapest Model 3 starts at just $38,990. The Model Y starts at $44,990, and that’s before the $7,500 EV tax credit. Included, prices start as low as $37,490.

Meanwhile, Polestar delivered around 54,600 vehicles globally last year. The new Polestar 4 electric SUV Coupe starts at $56,300 (including destination), with prices going up to $74,300.

In Europe, it starts at around $68,000 (EUR 63,200). Although compared to the Tesla Model Y, Polestar says it doesn’t see the EV leader as the competition. But the new Porsche Macan EV could be.

Polestar targets new Porsche Macan EV

“From a global perspective … I’m not here to comment on Tesla, but Tesla is … chasing volume.” Graeme Lambert, Polestar’s global design and tech PR and communications head, told Australia media (via Drive ).

Lamber said Tesla is a “mass-market production player,” and Polestar is “a premium luxury brand with volume targets that are in line with that.”

While Tesla is “making millions of cars,” Polestar never said it would do millions. “We’re talking … [as a brand] 150,000 global sales as a target for next year, for example.”

Instead, Polestar sees the new Porsche Macan EV as its target. Lambert said, “The target for us would be something like [the] Porsche Macan EV – a coupe SUV now pure electric. That would definitely be where we are looking, rather than Tesla.”

Porsche unveiled the fully electric Macan earlier this year, joining the Taycan as the brand’s second EV.

The Porsche Macan EV starts at $78,800, while the Turbo version has an MSRP of $105,300. CEO Oliver Blume said the new electric SUV had received over 10,000 orders last month, “and these customers haven’t even been able to drive the car yet.”

Electrek’s Take

Top comment by nozuka.

Porsche is a bit of a stretch. They can go for Audi/BMW/Mercedes, which are more in their price range.

Although Polestar is targeting the new Porsche Macan EV, the brand still considers gas-powered cars its ultimate rival.

Polestar’s CEO Thomas Ingentlath told The Telegraph automakers like Ford, GM, and Mercedes-Benz, that are delaying EV plans are falling into a trap.

“If you don’t participate in that and think you can wait, and customers are ready for it, it’s an incredible trap,” Polestar’s leader explained.

As rivals pull back, like Ford, which announced plans to delay its three-row electric SUV earlier today, Ingenlath sees this as an opportunity for Polestar.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Peter Johnson is covering the auto industry’s step-by-step transformation to electric vehicles. He is an experienced investor, financial writer, and EV enthusiast. His enthusiasm for electric vehicles, primarily Tesla, is a significant reason he pursued a career in investments. If he isn’t telling you about his latest 10K findings, you can find him enjoying the outdoors or exercising