is star trek a communist society

That's because the federation and human society are not socialist. There is a higher standard of living that is the result of technological breakthroughs that eliminated hunger and poverty. Buildings can be made with replicators, and rocks can be converted into food. There are things in the Star Trek universe that are scarce because a ...

It's not really a socialist utopia, and definitely not a communist one. Things like Starfleet and Section 31 hold massive amounts of power and tend to be strongly concentrated in the US. Something like the Maquis deportations wouldn't happen in a socialist society. Reply reply. bennettbf.

Gave Us a Utopian Vision of an Egalitarian, Postcapitalist Future. By. Simon Tyrie. Unlike many classic works of sci-fi, Star Trek offered an optimistic vision of humanity's future — one where democracy triumphs, exploitation is ended, and everyone's material needs are met. Still from Star Trek: The Next Generation.

The plot of "Star Trek" closely followed J. Posadas's essay proposing solidarity between the working class and the alien visitors. ... wrote "Red Star," a utopian novel about a Communist ...

Following Gene Roddenberry's dream of a future society lacking prejudice and focused on inclusion, social and legal equality, and egalitarian post-scarcity economics, Trek is well-known for its ...

Trekonomics: The Economics of Star Trek is a 2016 book by French economist Manu Saadia.The book deals with the topic of the scarcity in the economy by looking at it in reverse. The author describes the 24th-century Star Trek universe in which scarcity does not exist at all. The book explores a post-scarcity age and how our society would need to change to adapt itself to such an environment.

That said, I've noticed for a while now, on this sub, and elsewhere, this pervasive idea that Star Trek depicts a Communist or Marxist society, and that it's a pro-Communism show. I just read through a 600-post deep thread on this very sub where about a dozen or more users passionately argued these point. And I've seen videos and commentary ...

The United Federation of Planets in Star Trek is mostly libertarian-socialist, post-scarcity economy.These may seem antithetical, but they're not. Socialism in its only true idealistic form comes about in a post-scarcity economy where the means of production are effectively limitless with no financial consequences (in fact, there are no finances at all).

I find your 'answer' sickening bigotry and offencive and represents everything Star Trek is not. First of all it is factually incorrect for example you take the racist idea 'the Romulans were the Chinese' Gene based them on Mao's currupt interpretation and realisation of communist China - a political movement not the Chinise as a people.

Individualism, Not Socialism. Star Trek sometimes catches flack for portraying a Socialist space utopia. There's a vast, far-reaching central government, and Captain Picard often waxes - especially when time travel gives him the opportunity to lecture present-day people - about how humanity has evolved beyond self interest.

Asked by Dowd whether he was a bigger fan of "Star Wars" or "Star Trek," Thiel replied that, as a capitalist, he preferred the former. " 'Star Trek' is the communist one," he said.

The Star Trek utopia will free us from the fetters of the dismal science. The economics of Star Trek is thus True Communism. Fortunately, without the intervening bit of socialism that anyone has ...

yes with a Marxism-plot-convenience-ism tendency and potential posadist roots. now go away, in start-trek all politics must be expressed through alien-foreheads, ship-design, interpretations of the prime directive as well as phenomena like wormholes time-travel and parallel universes. 2. CenturionV. • 6 yr. ago.

Communist society is characterized by democratic processes, not merely in the sense of electoral democracy, but in the broader sense of open and collaborative social and workplace environments. ... The economy and society of the United Federation of Planets in the Star Trek franchise has been described as a communist society where material ...

Though Communism has historically led to nothing but famine, death, and societal collapse, the official Star Trek website recently interviewed Will Nguyen, also known by the moniker 'The Star Trek Communist', and discussed his belief that the failed economic system is the key to achieving the utopian future presented throughout the franchise by the official Star Trek website.

Communism is a philosophy of no hierarchy but of Social bliss, as the call it. I don't think Star Trek is Communist. If anyone read Communist history, they would know that human rights are not important, what is important is that state. The people of the Federation value human rights and diversity.

"Communist State" is an oxymoron. The Federation appears to be a technocratic, meritocratic, post-scarcity Socialist society. People often confuse Starfleet with the Federation, but Starfleet is merely an organization within the Federation which takes on the role of exploration, mediation between members, and diplomatic functions.

The Economics of Star Trek. Written: 2000.03.04 Last revised: 2000.07.10 ... goal of this document is to show that the writers and producers of Star Trek are promoting the values and ideals of communism. ... In real life, it was dangerous to stand out in a communist society. The police would often come and take someone without warning, and ...

Based on these visions, we have implemented our economic realities. Star Trek represents a work in this chain that began with Adam Smith in the late-18th century. It then led to a pushback by Karl Marx in the mid-19th century. Without mentioning economists by name, the series continues the tradition of arguing for and against parts of Smith and ...

Brainrot probably. The person praising Musk is from the Star Trek mirrorverse: The Terran Empire. So, he's not from the communist Federation. Jason Isaacs claims he ad-libbed Musk into that line. True that it's said by Evil Lorca but they probably didn't leave it in for that reason. It's still mostly a lib show.

Star Trek was co-opted by capitalists a long long long long time ago. It started with DS9, and really settled in with Voyager, which is why it was complete trash. Capitalists understand that Star Trek is explicitly anti-capitalist, and so they have to control it in order to distort it.

Star Trek: Discovery is one of the most widely-mocked shows in history, and Star Trek: Picard was an overall terrible production. Star Trek: New Worlds even had January 6 as a "major event."