canyon vs trek vs specialized

Based on frame geometry and build specs.

A bike with lower gearing will be easier to ride up steep hills, while a higher top end means it will pedal faster down hills.

Diverge Elite E5

Domane AL 2 Gen 4

(descending)

Based on build material and quality level of the frame, fork, wheelset, groupset, suspension system, and more.

Best endurance bikes 2024: a buying guide

Our top picks of the best endurance bikes suited to long days in the saddle plus what to look for when buying an endurance bike

• Sign up to our newsletter Newsletter

The Best Endurance Bikes Buyers Guide

The best endurance bikes are designed so you can just keep riding, with comfort and stability top attributes. Heading out with just a few provisions in your pockets and exploring known and unknown roads always feels a lot like freedom. For many of us, it's why we began cycling in the first place. 

Of course adventurous road rides can be experienced on any bicycle. But they're far more enjoyable if undertaken on one of the best endurance bikes.

These are road bikes designed for long days in the saddle; drop bar machines that are less concerned with speed, rather on delivering bags of comfort over demanding terrain. If you're planning on tackling a sportive or gran fondo or training to ride 100 miles , then these are the bikes best suited to the challenge ahead.

So what do the best endurance bikes have in common?

The frame's geometry will certainly be more relaxed than that of a race bike, with a more upright riding position and a shorter reach to the handlebars. This more upright riding position is likely to be accompanied by a frame design that places a premium on compliance - including in most cases room for wider tyres. Often you'll get other comfort features like microsuspension built into the frame too, helping to smooth out the constant vibration from uneven road surfaces. 

The idea of comfort extends into the bike's gearing , with a wide range commonplace, offering you a low gear for the steepest climbs as well as helping to preserve your energy, while still allowing you to ride quickly on flatter roads. Other features you should expect to see include disc brakes and mounts for mudguards.

The endurance sector is well-established meaning there's plenty of choice but also many decisions to make when choosing the best road bike for you.

We've ridden and reviewed a wide range of endurance bikes, so here's our pick of the best endurance bikes, after which we'll help to answer questions about what features you should look out for when searching for a bike in this category.

The Best Endurance Bikes

You can trust Cycling Weekly. Our team of experts put in hard miles testing cycling tech and will always share honest, unbiased advice to help you choose. Find out more about how we test.

The alloy Canyon Endurace range provides quality riding

1. Canyon Endurace AL 7.0 Disc

Our expert review:

Specifications

Reasons to buy, reasons to avoid.

The Endurace AL 7 has had a recent update.  It's still designed for all-day riding adventures, with geometry racy enough to provide a fast and fun ride. However it now has clearance for 35mm tyres and comes specced with 32mm (as opposed the 28mm on our review bike). There are also mounts for a tube tube box, further adding to its all-day riding credentials.

Elsewhere it still uses Shimano's ever-reliable 105 groupset - the 11-34 cassette provides plenty of range - and Fulcrum Racing 900 wheels. It's also still available in some markets with a rim-brake option.

Read our full review of the older model Canyon Endurace AL 7 .

The Giant Deft Advanced Pro range has a quality spec for its price

2. Giant Defy Advanced Pro 1

With a relaxed position and stable ride, those long miles will be eaten with ease aboard any of the Defy models.

Giant tweaked its best selling bike in 2020. It has taken its D-Fuse seatpost concept and applied it to the handlebars. Now both the seatpost and handlebar will dampen the bumps on the road. The brand has also lengthened the wheelbase slightly to add a comfortable level of stability. The tubes have also been re-shaped.

The Overdrive 2 steerer promises excellent handling and front end stiffness thanks to oversized headset bearings. 

The reviewed model comes with a Shimano Ultegra drivetrain. However for 2023 the 11-speed mechanical Ultegra groupset is now offered on the Defy Advanced Pro 2, which features Giant's SLR-2 carbon wheelset, while the Advanced Pro 1 is offered with both 12-speed Shimano Ultegra Di2 and SRAM Force eTap AXS. The top-tier Advanced Pro 0 uses SRAM Red eTap AXS while the Advanced Pro 3 is equipped with Shimano 105.

The Giant Defy Advanced range starts with a model equipped with a Shimano Tiagra groupset (not available in the US). The Advanced 2 features Shimano 105 while the Advanced 1 boasts an Ultegra groupset. There's also an Advanced 0 which utilises SRAM's Rival eTap AXS electronic groupset. 

We have a full explainer of all the bikes in the Giant Defy range or you can read our full review of the Giant Defy Advanced Pro 1 here.

Ribble's bike builder lets you decide on the spec that you want

3. Ribble Endurance SL Disc

With aerodynamically optimized tube shapes and a 2x11 hydraulic disc brake groupset, this offering from Ribble represents extremely good value. The quality of the frame does not disappoint, with the carbon doing a lot to absorb the road buzz. With discrete eyelets for mudguards and confidence-inspiring handling, long winter miles aren’t a problem for this bike.

The Mavic Aksium wheels our bike came with are not the lightest, nor the most aerodynamic. While they are certainly dependable and robust, in pure performance terms they do hold back the bike a little from its full potential.

Fortunately, Ribble allows you to swap out components with its Bikebuilder app. There are a wide range of wheelset options, heading up to some very expensive raceworthy hoops and you can choose the groupset spec that suits your budget, including the new Shimano Ultegra Di2 12-speed . 

You can read more about the Ribble Endurance SL Disc here.

The Specialized Roubaix has great vibration damping

4. Specialized Roubaix Sport

The Specialized Roubaix saw a major overhaul in 2017 with the addition of the 'Future Shock' front suspension, and 2019 saw another update, with adjustable suspension added to the top models. 

The suspension built into the steerer tube provides 20mm of damping between the Hover handlebars, with their slight raise, and the frame. The Future Shock suspension does a great job of improving comfort on really rough surfaces, and also helps to improve handling, as the tyre spends more time in contact with the tarmac around bumpy surfaces. The bar shape does mean that there's less room to mount lights and other accessories though.

At the rear the carbon S-Works Pave seatpost is clamped below the top of the frame, adding some extra flex and compliance and there's clearance for 33mm tyres, although no mudguard mounts. There's a good quality range of finishing kit, although we found the Praxis Alba chainset didn't shift as smoothly as an in-series Shimano 105 unit.

The 2023 Roubaix comes in a number of models with wide ranging specs. The entry level Roubaix Sport comes with a Shimano 105 hydraulic groupset (with a Praxis chainset), while the Comp model is offered with  an electronic SRAM Rival eTap AXS groupset (£5,000). There are also Expert and Pro builds as well as the top-tier S-Works bike that comes with Shimano Dura-Ace Di2 12-speed and has an RRP of £12,600.

We reckon that the higher specced models of the Roubaix are a better bet than the entry-level Sport spec, as they give you features like a lockable Future Shock, which helps if you're riding hard. Take a look at our reviews of the Specialized Roubaix Comp .

For more info, read our explainer of the Specialized bike range or our full review of the Specialized Roubaix Sport .

Cannondale's SmartSense system uses a single battery to power lights and a rearview radar

5. Cannondale Synapse Carbon

The Cannondale Synapse is renowned for offering a comfortable ride, without cancelling out the quality handling and frame reactiveness that you want from a road bike.

It's been significantly updated for 2022 and we haven't yet had the opportunity to fully review the latest models, although you can read our first impressions of the Synapse Carbon 2 RL. 

The headline-grabbing new feature is the integration of SmartSense lighting and a radar to let you know what's coming up behind you. There's also a new carbon frame with clearance for 35mm tyres, better aerodynamics and mounts for mudguards and a top tube bag. 

The RRP for the top spec Synapse Carbon 1 RLE is £9,000 but some of this new tech is offered on cheaper models, such as the Synapse Carbon 3 L, which still boasts the SmartSense lights, and the frameset improvements but is specced with Shimano 105 to help lower the price significantly to £3,200.  The spec sheet above applies to this new version rather than the 105-equipped model we reviewed in 2020.

We have recently ridden this latest iteration of the Synapse , where we got to experience first hand the various updates including the SmartSense lights and radar.

The Boardman SLR range provides great value

6. Boardman SLR 8.9

The Boardman SLR 8.9 delivers a carbon frame and fork, which have been wind tunnel tested, for a price that's not much over £1000, where many brands will give you alloy. Although billed as an all-rounder, the SLR 8.9 is plenty comfortable for longer rides and sportives. 

To hit that price it's made a few compromises, so you get rim brakes rather than discs, although we found them as effective as the cable operated discs that you're likely to find at this price. 

You also don't get quite the full 11-speed Shimano 105 groupset, with an FSA chainset, but it's impressive for the price. Tyre clearance at 28mm is okay, but wider rubber would up the compliance.

Read our full review of the Boardman SLR 8.9 here.

Wide tyres and IsoSpeed provide all-day comfort 

7. Trek Domane SL6

The Trek Domane has evolved over the years into an extremely capable endurance road bike that can tackle long miles on surprisingly rough terrain. Part of its magic is the inclusion of the front and rear IsoSpeed decouplers; these pivot-based flex points take the square edge off big hits without sacrificing any efficiency or power transfer.

The other piece of the pie is the tyre clearance. There is room in the frame for up to 38c tyres (35c with fenders), which also makes it somewhat gravel-friendly. Trek has also integrated nifty down tube storage that comes with a tool roll and is big enough for a few spares and tools or heaps of snacks.

We reviewed the 2019 SL 6 but the 2022 version is offered with both Shimano's Ultegra groupset (as tested) or if you prefer electronic shifting, SRAM's Rival eTap AXS. There's a broad range of Domane models in the range, starting with the sub-£1000 alloy Domane and topped off by the Domane SLR 9 at over £11,000, so it's worth reading our Trek bike range overview for more context.

Read our full review of the Trek Domane SL 6 too.

The BMC Roadmachine offers fast handling along with comfort

8. BMC Roadmachine 01 Four Di2

The Roadmachine from Swiss brand BMC has the slightly more upright ride position, tubes shaped for compliance and space for tyres up to 33mm that mark it out for endurance riders. It's a bit faster handling than many endurance bikes though.

The Roadmachine 01 comes with BMC's top end carbon and an Ultegra Di2 groupset. There's a D-shaped seatpost, also designed to smooth the road and BMC's integrated cockpit for clean looks. There are no fittings for full mudguards, but BMC does make a rear clip-on that's mounted to the rear of the seatpost to help keep your rear end dry.

Read our full review of the BMC Roadmachine here.

Countervail tech helps add comfort to the Infinito XE

9. Bianchi Infinito XE Disc

Painted up in its trademark celeste green, the Bianchi Infinito XE sees a slightly more relaxed position than its racier cousins with a taller head tube and a slightly longer wheelbase — which also makes more room between the rear stays for bigger 32c tyres.

But hidden between the layers of carbon that make up the frame is Bianchi's Countervail vibration cancelling technology. The viscoelastic material which is incorporated into the layup was originally developed for NASA and does surprisingly well to eat up harsh road vibrations before they reach the touchpoints. The layup also sees the same Carbon Nano Technology used in the Oltre XR which reduces the gaps between the resin and carbon fibres vastly increasing the overall stretch and stiffness.

All of this adds up to a planted and confident frame that creates a plush ride, but with chunky tubing that is unyielding to twisting and flexing during big efforts and sprints.

The current model is offered across three builds: 11-speed Shimano 105, Ultegra and SRAM Rival eTap AXS. 

Read our full review of the Bianchi Infinito XE .

What is an endurance or sportive bike?

An endurance bike, otherwise referred to as a sportive or gran fondo bike, is a bike that has been designed to make long days in the saddle just that little bit easier by providing a more comfortable ride that should not only protect your backside from all the vibrations passing through your seat-post and saddle, but should also keep your legs fresher after multiple hours on the road.

These bikes have become increasingly popular over the last few years for two main reasons. First, the huge growth of sportives and fondos has meant that there are more and more people whose main concern when buying a new bike is that it makes eating up the miles on long rides that bit more pleasant. And second, most people don't get to ride on velvety Swiss roads, and so as to tackle broken tamac and chip seal most riders generally value a bike that is able to take the worst out of rough tarmac.

How should an endurance bike ride?

Comfort is your primary concern when buying an endurance bike. As most of your weight is supported by your saddle rather than the handlebars, it is most important that the back-end of the bike is comfortable. However, depending on your position, your arms and wrists will still be bearing a fair amount of your weight so front end comfort is still important.

But comfort is not the be-all and end-all with an endurance bike. After all, comfort is not going to be your only concern 100-percent of the time, and you still want a bike that is able to respond and give an exciting ride when you want to put the hammer down.

This means that you don't want a bike that provides comfort by building flexibility into every part of the frame as this will result in a frame that cannot respond to quick bursts of power and will mean that you can't hold your speed as well. So any extra comfort would be offset by the extra time that you have to spend out on the road due to lower average speeds.

As you're not going to be tearing up a tight and twisty criterium circuit on an endurance bike, the handling should be leaning towards the more chilled out end of the spectrum. This means that you need to put in more effort to navigate the bike through corners, which might sound like a bad thing, but also means that less effort is required to keep it on the straight and narrow.

Don't worry though, it should still be able to cope with everything but seriously fast and technical descents. And anyway, your bike handling is probably more important than the bike's handling when it comes to cornering.

What is endurance bike geometry?

The geometry is one of the most important elements that defines how a bike rides. Indeed, give an expert a geometry chart and they will be able to have a pretty good guess at the type of bike that they are looking at and how it rides.

The geometry of an endurance bike is tuned to add comfort and stability

There are a number of features of an endurance bike's geometry that should make it comfortable for riding long distances over rough terrain, normally including a more upright riding position that will place less stress on your back and neck.

The first thing to look for is a taller head tube, which will usually be more than 17cm for a 56cm frame, although on some bikes it will be approaching 20cm, which will mean that you don't have to lean over as far to reach the bars. Of course, this position can always be tweaked by the use of spacers underneath the stem and by using stems of different angles.

Endurance bikes will also usually come with a slightly shorter top tube, which will effectively bring the saddle and handlebars closer together. Again this will mean a more upright, less stretched out position to reduce the strain on your back and neck.

Other endurance bike geometry features are designed to improve the comfort of the frame and to alter the bike's handling. Most endurance bikes have a slightly slacker head tube angle and greater fork rake, which will create a more compliant front end and more stable handling, while a longer wheelbase (occasionally greater than a metre) also makes for a less twitchy ride.

Slacker frame angles add stability

What makes an endurance bike comfortable?

Aside from the geometry there are a whole load of different features that different manufacturers build into their endurance bikes to try and make them stand out from the crowd.

One of the most popular such features is the use of some sort of suspension or vibration dampening technology to reduce the amount of road buzz that is transmitted through the frame and into your body. Two of the most well-known are Trek's IsoSpeed decoupler technology and Specialized's Future Shock, although there are other similar systems used by the likes of Pinarello and Lapierre. Other brands like Bianchi (see above) and Look build layers of vibration absorbing materials into their carbon layups.

Yet other manufacturers create comfortable endurance bikes by working with the carbon-fibre layups of the frames to build flex into areas like the seatstays and top tube while other areas of the frame are stiffened up to make sure that power transfer isn't hindered.

Features like Trek's IsoSpeed increase ride comfort

What components should I look out for on an endurance bike?

As when buying any new bike, the most important thing to look at when buying an endurance bike is the groupset. Most endurance bikes will come with gearing with a wide range that should enable you to get up some pretty steep hills even when tired at the end of a long ride but still ride relatively fast on flat and downhill runs.

This will usually mean a compact chainset (50/34t) and a wide range cassette with a 32t or even 34t largest sprocket. SRAM eTap AXS cassettes go out to 36 teeth. Along with smaller chainrings, enabled by SRAM's cassettes going down to 10 teeth, that means that there's more range on the large chainring before you need to change down and a lot of low range with the small chainring, which goes well below 1:1. 

However, your choice of groupset won't affect the comfort of your endurance bike, while your choice of wheels and tyres certainly will.

You probably won't get much of a choice if you're buying a complete bike, but some wheels with wider rims combined with wider tyres will improve the comfort of the ride. More and more endurance bikes are coming with clearance for 28mm, 30mm or even wider tyres , which can be run at lower pressures to soak up road vibrations, and come with the added benefit of better grip and lower rolling resistance. Most of them can be run tubeless too, which lets you lower tyre pressure even more.

The benefits are greater when combined with wider rims , which allow for a greater volume of air within the tyre at any given pressure, and therefore a more comfortable ride, as well as making for a wheel that is also able to absorb more vibrations from the road and greater tyre stability for predictable cornering.

Endurance bikes typically offer a wide gear range

Finally, the majority of endurance bikes come with disc brakes rather than rim brakes. These are by no means a deal breaker, but certainly offer a number of benefits over rim brakes. Most notably you get more consistent braking performance in wet and dry conditions, while they have more braking power and better modulation as you don't need to squeeze the brake lever as hard to apply the brakes. 

More expensive bikes are likely to have hydraulic rather than mechanical disc brakes. In general hydraulic systems are more powerful than mechanical disc brakes and they're a closed system so not subject to contamination and should be lower maintenance.

How must does an endurance bike cost?

There's no need to splash the cash in search of a good endurance bike. The geometry is probably the most important thing in creating a comfortable endurance bike, and in general bikes at the lower end of the market have a more relaxed geometry. This means that you should be able to pick up a comfortable endurance bike for well under a grand.

However, if you want something made out of carbon fibre and featuring the bells and whistles of some snazzy vibration dampening technology, then you can spend a lot more than that. £2,000 / $2500 and a bit of shopping around should be able to secure you a bike with the same frame design features as used by the pros in the likes of Paris-Roubaix and the Tour of Flanders, albeit made with a cheaper mix of carbon fibre and with a cheaper (although usually perfectly good) groupset and heavier wheels.

Spending more money than this will move you up the groupset ladder but might not give you a significantly better frame, so it's worth considering whether this extra money is better spent on other kit, such as some high quality shorts which will greatly improve your comfort on long days in the saddle, or a bike fit which could relieve any aches and pains that you get from riding.

Get The Leadout Newsletter

The latest race content, interviews, features, reviews and expert buying guides, direct to your inbox!

After winning the 2019 National Single-Speed Cross-Country Mountain Biking Championships and claiming the plushie unicorn (true story), Stefan swapped the flat-bars for drop-bars and has never looked back. 

Since then, he’s earnt his 2ⁿᵈ cat racing licence in his first season racing as a third , completed the South Downs Double in under 20 hours and Everested in under 12 .

But his favourite rides are multiday bikepacking trips, with all the huge amount of cycling tech and long days spent exploring new roads and trails - as well as histories and cultures. Most recently, he’s spent two weeks riding from Budapest into the mountains of Slovakia . 

Height: 177cm

Weight: 67–69kg

A versatile and well-made rack that will fit most bikes, but is particularly useful for frames that lack rack mounts.

By Paul Grele Published 29 March 24

Tom Davidson joins British Continental team Lifeplus-Wahoo as they prepare for the most feared race of the season

By Tom Davidson Published 29 March 24

Useful links

• Tour de France
• Giro d'Italia
• Vuelta a España

Buyer's Guides

• Best road bikes
• Best gravel bikes
• Best smart turbo trainers
• Best cycling computers
• Editor's Choice
• Bike Reviews
• Component Reviews
• Clothing Reviews
• Contact Future's experts
• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Cookies policy
• Advertise with us

Cycling Weekly is part of Future plc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site . © Future Publishing Limited Quay House, The Ambury, Bath BA1 1UA. All rights reserved. England and Wales company registration number 2008885.

Be back soon!

This website is under maintenance. Check back tomorrow!

*If you’re the owner of this website and have questions, reach out to Bluehost. We’re happy to help.

Trek Vs Canyon Bikes ?

Trek and Canyon are well known for creating high-end, pro-level performance bikes. But considering that Giant makes most of their bike frames, how do Trek vs Canyon bikes compare?

While Trek focuses more on the high-end and mid-range markets, Canyon targets all markets. However, Trek offers you more options when it comes to customizing, purchasing route, and budget bikes, even though its high-end options are costlier than Canyon.

Generally, there are a few differences between the two bikes which I will explain. So, I’ll differentiate the two bikes according to the market focus, customization, purchasing route, and price.

What is more, I’ll compare their weights and individually compare their leading bike categories. That includes their MTBs, Road bikes, and Hybrids.

Let’s get started!

Below is a summary table of comparison between Trek and Canyon bikes:

Trek Vs Canyon Bikes Differences

Giant is known to make bike frames for various bike brands, of which Canyon and Trek are among the beneficiaries.  

However, even with the same manufacturer, some things set the two apart, and they include:

1. Market Focus

The two bike brands produce high-end and exceptional bikes that last for ages. However, Trek makes fewer entry-level options but more midrange and high-end bikes.

In Contrast, Canyon tries to balance by producing all bike ranges equally. They don’t incline to any side.

Verdict : While Trek favors high-end bikes more, Canyon has it all!

2. Bike Weight

Canyon bikes are slightly lightweight compared to Trek bikes. The lightweight in Canyon is due to the light carbon frames, unlike Trek’s heavier Aluminum frames.

Ideally, carbon frames have hollow designs, thus the exceptional lightweight in Canyon bikes.

However, Trek also employs carbon technology in some of their bikes, but they are not as lightweight as Canyons.

Verdict : Generally, Canyon bikes are lighter than Trek bikes of the same type.

3. Bike Warranty

A good warranty shows the bike brand’s confidence in its products. Moreover, a contract acts as security and infuses trust in the buyer. The two-bike brands diverge when it comes to warranty periods.

Canyon offers a 6-year assurance on its frames and forks for Racing, Triathlon, and Commuter bikes. On the other hand, Trek offers the bike owner a limited lifetime warranty for their frames.

Moreover, Trek offers a 1–5-year warranty for the self-build Bontrager components.

Verdict : Trek’s lifetime warranty for their frames inspires confidence and superiority in their products.

4. Purchase Route

Trek and Canyon bikes vary when it comes to purchasing routes. However, this affects customer access but doesn’t affect bike quality.

Generally, Trek bikes are available for purchase on their website and through trusted, loyal dealers like Amazon.

Whereas for Canyon, their bikes are ONLY sold through their website.

Verdict : Trek offers more purchase routes than Canyon.  

5. Trek Vs. Canyon Bikes Customization

Canyon bike brand creates their bikes with the most high-end quality components to meet the desired look. However, the Canyon company allows you to customize your bike according to size. Therefore, with Canyon, you specifically get what you love!

Interestingly, with Trek’s Project One, you can get your unique bike through the custom-made program. To get a fantastic outstanding Trek bike, select the; model, fit, styling, and components of your preference to get your dream bike!

Verdict : Both Trek and Canyon allow you to design your bike specifically. But generally, unlike Canyon, Trek will enable you to pick everything, including frames.

6. Bike Prices

Despite the Trek’s and Canyon’s difference in price range, they offer high-end quality bikes. In the entry-level market, Trek offers more affordable bikes than Canyon.

But once we come to the high-end sector, Trek’s high-end bikes are costlier than Canyon’s.

Overall, Canyon bikes are slightly cheaper because they sell only through their website, thus reducing cost.

Verdict : If you are on a tight budget, go for Canyon’s high-end bikes as they are more affordable or a Trek’s entry-level to save on cost.

Trek Vs Canyon Compared: Bike Types

Trek creates the following bike categories:

• Mountain bikes
• Hybrid bikes
• Women bikes

Canyon, on the hand, creates the following:

• Gravel bikes

Verdict – Both bike brands stock similar bike types. Let’s compare the individual categories.

1. Trek Vs Canyon Bikes Compared

Since we have compared Trek and Canyon bikes on a lighter note, let’s dig into their similar bike category comparison!

2. Trek Vs Canyon Road Bike

Here’s how Trek and Canyon Road bikes compare:

• Road Bike Type

Trek makes lightweight, gravel, women, endurance, electric, and performance road bikes. On the other hand, Canyon makes lightweight aero, race, cyclocross, endurance, and triathlon road bikes.

• Road Bike Price

Trek’s road bike price starts from $1,020, making them affordable. However, its high-end options, which usually are electric, go for up to $13,000.

Canyon road bike price starts from $1,199 to about $11,649. So, while you can get a cheap entry Trek road bike, their high-end options cost much more.

Trek offers road bikes for entry-level (though fewer), mid-range, and high-end markets to cater to cyclists worldwide. Nonetheless, Trek’s focus is mainly on high-end and mid-range markets.

On the other hand, Canyon’s road bikes focus on entry-level, mid-level, and high-end markets.

• Frame Geometry

Trek road bikes have less aggressive geometry, perfect for beginners and casual riders. Canyon bikes, in contrast, have more aggressive geometry, thus making them favorable for professional riders.

3. Trek Vs Canyon MTB

Here’s how Trek and Canyon MTBs compare:

Trek stocks cross country, trail, and full-suspension MTBs, and has a dedicated women’s and kid’s bike line. On the other hand, Canyon offers cross country, enduro, fat, and downhill MTBs.

Trek’s lowest mountain bike prices start from $600 but their most high-end options retail at about $11,000.

In contrast, Canyon MTB starts from about $1,199, as it’s the case for the entry-level Stoic 2 , to about $9,000 as it’s the case of the Spectral: ON CF 9 .

However, even if Canyon’s entry-level bike is costlier than Trek, Canyon bikes remain the most affordable high-end option.

Both bike brands employ unique and advanced suspension technologies to make the most fun-to-ride MTBs. As a result, it’s harder to separate the two bike brands according to the MTB suspension.

Besides, the overall experience of the bike suspension differs from rider to rider. I guess the best tip is to try both brands and be the judge.

• Bike Geometry

Trek MTB is perfect for enduro cycling, while Canyon bikes have a more aggressive geometry.

• Carbon Technology

Both Trek and Canyon mountain bikes employ high-quality frames, mainly carbon. Generally, carbon frames are lighter, making it easier to ride uphill.

However, not all Trek bikes employ carbon technology, only high-end options because carbon is expensive. So, you are likely to get entry-level Trek MTBs in alpha aluminum frames, which are lighter than the standard aluminum but heavier than carbon.

Both Canyon and Trek employ SRAM on their high-end bikes and Shimano on mid-level and entry-level bikes.

4. Trek Vs Canyon Hybrid Bikes

Here, let’s compare the Hybrid bikes of both brands:

Canyon hybrid bikes blend the best properties of Canyon MTBs and Canyon road bikes. The bikes are suitable for trails and urban roads and are commuter-friendly.

The same goes go for Trek. Trek has a fantastic line of hybrid bikes for women, men, and kids. These bikes are decent quality, fun to ride, and pretty comfortable.

Trek and Canyon hybrid bikes are available at any price, depending on your budget. However, Trek’s high-end hybrid bikes are often costlier than Canyon’s, though its low-end options are more affordable.   

Generally, Trek and Canyon employ carbon frames on their high-end hybrid bikes. These frames guarantee comfort while cycling and also feel lighter.

1. Are Trek Bikes Made by Giant?

As its name hints, Giant is one of the leading bike manufacturers. Not only does Giant make its frames, but it also makes for other brands such as Trek, Canyon, Scott, and Colnago.

2. Is Canyon Better Than Trek?

Ideally, you’ll be happy to ride either since they are both great value bikes. However, Trek has longer wheelbases and effective top tubes, while Canyon has shorter top lines and ships with longer stems.

3. Does Trek Own Canyon Bikes?

Trek does not own Canyon, but Quest is the manufacturer for both bike brands.

4. Are Canyon Bikes Worth it?

Canyon bikes are good and worth every cent! Canyon bikes feature high-end components at an affordable price. The bikes are strong, comfortable to ride, and have high-performance choices, befitting pro riders.

Additionally, Canyon allows you to customize your bike size and offers you a wide selection of MTBs, road bikes, hybrids, among many others.

5. Are Trek Bikes Good?

Yes, Trek bikes are good , especially for serious cyclists. The manufacturer makes high-end bikes that promise reliability, durability, and best performance even in trying conditions. The best bit is that these bikes also have a decent reselling value.

Closing Thoughts: Trek Vs Canyon Bikes

Now you know what sets Trek and Canyon apart. If you want a high-end bike or a cheap entry-level, consider Trek has it offers more options than Canyon. But if you want to save on a midrange or high-end option, go for Canyon as the brand allows you to do so.

Overall, there’s no doubt that both Trek and Canyon offer the best bikes. It’s, however, essential to consider the specs carefully to see what you are paying for, especially when comparing cycles by both brands side by side.

Also Read: Ibis Ripmo Vs Ripley

• Pinkbike.com
• Register New User
• First Looks
• Friday Fails
• Community Blogs
• Fantasy League DH
• Places Directory

Video: Trek Supercaliber vs Cannondale Scalpel vs Canyon Lux vs Specialized Epic - Field Test Round Table

Cool Features

When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Learn more.

Trek Vs Specialized Bikes – Which Has the Better Bikes?

You've decided to buy a bike, and you've narrowed your search down to two brands, Trek and specialized. Which one of them offers more value for your money? It's the classic case of Trek vs. Specialized. Well, Both of these cycle manufacturers are established and have their crowds of a loyal fan base. They both offer a diverse range of bikes across categories and budgets.

But there has got to be a clear winner between the two brands when it comes to deciding the reliability of their bikes, right? Frankly speaking, the answer isn't a clear cut one. It is true that Trek houses more varieties of bikes than Specialized. But the bikes in both brands boast high-quality components . Plus, the bikes from both brands do not vary too much in terms of their price range.

Both Trek and Specialized have a wide range of road bikes, mountain bikes , and even kids' bikes to their credit. As many characteristics as bikes from these brands share, they also have that many differences between them.

Before we get into the nitty-gritty of which brand has the better bikes, here's a brief recap on what each brand stands for individually.

Trek Vs Specialized Bikes Comparison

Overview of trek.

Trek bikes are most popularly associated with the legendary Lance Armstrong. It was on these bikes that this Cycling champ won all of his Tour de France championships. Therefore, it comes as no surprise that Trek is popularly known for their road bikes.

This American company made its entry into the bike market in 1976, but most of its bikes are made in Taiwan. Today, the brand has a commendable range of bikes for men, women, and kids. You can also be sure to find Trek bikes for every level of rider and for different riding terrains.

• The manufacturer has an extensive range of bikes for all kinds of riders.
• Trek bikes can be customized in more ways than one.
• The brand is most famous for its road bikes.
• Trek bikes can be pricey compared to cycles from other brands.

Overview of Specialized

Specialized began its journey of manufacturing bikes with their iconic road and touring bikes. Then in 1995, it added on to its accolades with its range of mountain bikes. This range of mountain bikes was aptly named 'The Full Force.' Today, Specialized is synonymous with mountain bikes, with the company even sponsoring Loic Bruni, the downhill world champion.

• Specialized is well known for its range of mountain bikes.
• Like Trek, Specialized also caters to riders of all levels.
• Specialized bikes are more expensive than Trek bikes.

Feature Comparison

When you are a beginner rider, it can sometimes be difficult to tell the minor differences between different bike models. But experienced riders are likely to notice even the slightest of differences. This happens especially for lower-end bike ranges. The high-end bikes typically boast quite visible differences in design, geometry, or components.

Regardless of that, bikes from Trek and Specialized both have their own unique appeal. So at the end of the day, which bike model or brand you decide to go with boils down to personal preference. Don't hold back from checking out as many options of bikes from both manufacturers. Doing so will only benefit you.

To help simplify your quest for the ideal bike for yourself, we've compiled a list of differences between Trek bikes and Specialized bikes. Take a look:

Customization

Trek allows riders the flexibility to build a bike of your liking. You have the option to choose your bike's fork, frame, and other parts so as to customize it. Pretty neat, isn't it?

Specialized has a wide range of bike types and styles, but this manufacturer doesn't offer customization services.

The Design of Their Bikes' Rear Suspension

Trek takes pride in their Active Braking Pivot and Full Floater rear suspension designs. The Full Floater rear suspension design system works in a way that prevents the shock mount's movement from increasing when you pedal. This way, there is more pedaling efficiency.

The Active Braking Pivot rear suspension design system works similar to the braking systems in modern cars. Here, the rear suspension allows more chatter, so your bike's wheels skid less.

Specialized bikes generally use the Future Shock rear suspension design. Incorporating this design into their bikes helps riders journey over rough roads with ease. This design system also allows more control and stability for riders.

The Pricing of Their Bikes

Bikes from Trek or Specialized aren't exactly cheap, especially if we're talking about mountain bikes. Even so, both manufacturers offer lower-end bikes just as they do high-end ones. The price range of bikes from Trek and Specialized are almost on par with each other. In this case, the bike model or the type of bike determines its price.

The Materials They Use

In most cases, both Trek and Specialized use the same materials with their bikes. With either brand, you'll find that they utilize premium aluminum for their lower-end bikes. Moreover, they both save carbon fiber for their higher-end bikes.

Components & Parts

This is another area where both manufacturers find common ground. They both use SRAM and Shimano components for their bikes. So if you want a fair comparison of bikes from these manufacturers, the fair way to do so is to compare bikes that are on the same price range.

Range of Mountain Bikes

Trek's range of mountain bikes covers cross-country mountain bikes, hardtail mountain bikes, aluminum mountain bikes, 27.5 m mountain bikes, carbon mountain bikes, entry-level, and beginner mountain bikes, and 29er mountain bikes.

Take the Trek Procaliber 9.6 mountain bike, for instance. It is a heavy duty mtb that allows you to experience the thrill of riding a carbon race bike that boasts IsoSpeed, all at a fairly affordable price. This bike is equipped with solid features, and it also provides you with the option to upgrade its parts easily if you want to.

Specialized's range of mountain bikes includes cross country mountain bikes, trail mountain bikes, and BMX/dirt jump mountain bikes.

The Chisel Comp is a classic example of an exemplary cross-country mountain bike from Specialized. It impresses with its superior performance and budget-friendly price tag. This bike's aluminum frame is responsive and facilitates easy handling when riding over technical courses. Getting you ahead of other riders are the bike's fast-rolling wheels. Its wheels boast high-speed control when riding on difficult terrain.

Range o f Road Bikes

Under its road bikes category, Trek houses performance, women's road bikes , aluminum, lightweight, endurance, carbon, and disc brake road bikes. These bikes typically feature IsoSpeed or Aerodynamic designs.

This Trek Domane 5 embodies everything this brand aims for with its road bikes - versatility, speed, and a smooth ride. It features a carbon frame (OCLV), which has both rear and front IsoSpeed. This detailing helps smooth out bumps on the road and does its bit to reduce fatigue on long rides. The Domane SL5 road bike from Trek is ideal for riders looking for a racing bike that is quick and able to withstand long distances.

For Specialized, their range of road bikes includes performance bikes, triathlon bikes, and gravel bikes.

A Specialized road bike that justifies this manufacturer's credibility is the Tarmac Disc Comp. It offers stiff competition with its impressive climbing responsiveness and great descending capabilities. This bike comes with hydraulic disc brakes, which boast precise shifting and good stopping power.

Features such as its cartridge hubs, which are sealed, and its reliable wheels equip this bike to confidently aid you in conquering highways, challenging terrains, and street corners. This Specialized road bike also comes with 24 spokes on its front and rear. These spokes help maintain the bike's weight and contribute to its durability.

What are the Differences and Similarities Between Trek Bikes & Specialized Bikes?

Initially, Trek was mainly associated with making top-notch cross country bikes. The company changed the game when they started manufacturing other styles of bikes. Today, Trek boasts an impressive range of bikes for all sorts of riding feats – road bikes, mountain bikes, and hybrid bikes .

Not one to be caught lacking, Specialized entices with its own versions of top-notch bikes for every type of rider. They are best known for their mountain bikes, but they also make road bikes , turbo E-bikes, active bikes, and kids' bikes. Specialized bikes are the ideal choice for you if you want precision, good quality components, strength, and aren't afraid of financially splurging on a bike.

What are the main differences between full suspension mountain bikes from Trek and Specialized?

Full suspension mountain bikes from Trek and Specialized both offer a comfortable and smooth ride on rough terrain, but there are a few key differences to consider. Trek full suspension bikes tend to be more versatile and can handle a wider range of terrain, while Specialized bikes are often designed with a specific type of rider and terrain in mind. Trek also tends to use higher-end components and materials, such as carbon fiber, in their full suspension bikes, making them generally more expensive than Specialized models.

How do Trek and Specialized compare when it comes to mountain biking performance?

Both Trek and Specialized are highly regarded for their mountain biking performance, but there are some key differences to consider. Trek bikes are known for their versatility and ability to handle a wide range of terrain, while Specialized bikes are often designed with specific types of riders and terrain in mind. Trek also tends to use higher-end components and materials, such as carbon fiber, in their mountain bikes, which can give them a performance edge. Ultimately, the best choice will depend on your specific needs and preferences as a mountain biker.

Are Trek and Specialized considered to be among the top mountain bike brands?

Yes, both Trek and Specialized are widely considered to be among the best mountain bike brands in the industry. They both have a long history of innovation and performance in the world of mountain biking, and their bikes are known for their high quality and durability. They are also both respected by professional mountain bikers and are often seen as the go-to choice for serious riders.

What are some key factors to consider when choosing between Trek and Specialized mountain bikes?

When choosing between Trek and Specialized mountain bikes, there are several key factors to consider. These include the type of terrain you will be riding on, your riding style and preferences, and your budget. It's also important to consider the components and materials used in the bikes, as well as the level of support and service offered by the manufacturer. Finally, it can be helpful to talk to other riders and visit a local bike shop to get more information and advice.

Are Trek and Specialized bikes available at local bike shops?

Yes, both Trek and Specialized bikes are widely available at local bike shops. Many bike shops carry a range of models from both brands, and can offer expert advice and support to help you choose the right bike for your needs. In addition, both Trek and Specialized have their own network of authorized dealers, where you can find a wider range of bikes and accessories, as well as specialized service and support.

How do specialized mountain bikes compare to trek bikes in terms of performance and durability on rough terrain?

Both specialized and trek bikes are known for their ability to handle tough, rocky trails, but specialized is generally considered to have an edge in downhill riding. Specialized's advanced suspension systems and use of carbon fiber in their frames give them a more agile, responsive ride on steep, technical trails. Trek, on the other hand, is known for their durability and reliability, making them a solid choice for riders who value long-lasting performance.

Are specialized and trek bikes in the same price range?

Yes, specialized and trek bikes are generally in the same price range, with entry-level models starting around $500 and high-end models reaching over $5,000. However, specialized's use of carbon fiber in their frames often makes their bikes slightly more expensive than comparable trek models.

What are the key differences between specialized and trek's electric mountain bike offerings?

Specialized and trek both offer a range of electric mountain bikes, but specialized's e-bikes are generally more performance-oriented and designed for more aggressive riders. Specialized's e-bikes feature more powerful motors and larger battery packs, allowing them to tackle steep, technical trails with ease. Trek's e-bikes, on the other hand, are more geared towards leisurely, casual rides, with smaller motors and batteries that are better suited for flat, smooth trails.

Should a new mountain biker choose a hardtail or full-suspension bike from specialized or trek?

As a new mountain biker, it's important to consider your riding style and the type of trails you'll be riding on when deciding between a hardtail or full-suspension bike. If you're planning to ride mostly on smooth, well-groomed trails, a hardtail bike from specialized or trek will provide a lightweight, efficient ride that's easy to handle. However, if you're planning to tackle more challenging, technical trails, a full-suspension bike from specialized or trek will offer more control and comfort on rough, rocky terrain.

How do specialized and trek's entry-level mountain bikes compare in terms of quality and value?

Both specialized and trek offer a range of entry-level mountain bikes that are designed to provide a high-quality, affordable option for new mountain bikers. Specialized's entry-level bikes are typically made with lightweight aluminum frames, while trek's entry-level bikes are often made with a combination of aluminum and carbon fiber. Both specialized and trek offer a wide range of components and features on their entry-level bikes, so it's important to carefully compare the specs and prices of each brand to find the best value for your needs.

The Final Verdict

Every component in Trek bikes is carefully thought out to enhance the rider's comfort and performance. Most bikes from this manufacturer feature hydraulic disc brakes and trigger shifters. They are also no stranger to Rockshocks forks and SRAM gears. Similarly, Specialized bikes put up fierce competition with equally impressive features and components.

It's okay if you aren't willing to shell out too much cash on a Specialized mountain bike because the company offers lower-end bikes that promise just the same level of high performance. Detailing such as Suntour forks, mechanical disc brakes, and Shimano components make these lesser-priced bikes just as efficient as their more expensive counterparts.

Last Updated on October 14, 2023 by Daniel White

• MAGAZINE OFFERS
• BIKE INSURANCE
• Best Products
• Maintenance
• Accessories
• Long-Term Reviews
• BikeRadar Podcast
• First Look Friday
• Bike of the Week
• Tech Features
• Routes and Rides
• Bike Galleries
• BikeRadar Bargains
• Buyer's Guides
• Fitness & Training
• Sizing & Fit
• Mountain Biking UK
• Cycling Plus

Best climbing bikes 2024 | Lightweight bikes for when the road points upwards

The top lightweight road bikes for climbing

Russell Burton / Our Media

Simon von Bromley

The best climbing bikes are low-weight, helping you conquer the longest (or steepest) ascents.

There's a definite buzz to riding a fast, flyweight machine, and many road cyclists love the fast acceleration and responsiveness of climbing bikes.

A modern lightweight bike has to prove itself not solely through whether it's under the UCI weight limit, but also by having the aerodynamics to up your ride speed on descents and the flat.

Keep reading to see our pick of the best climbing bikes and to find out more about these lightweight bikes, check out our buyer's guide at the end of this article .

Best climbing bikes 2024, as rated by our expert testers

Giant tcr advanced sl 0 disc.

• £9,699 / $11,000 / AU$13,499 as tested
• Weight: 6.7kg (L)
• Pros: Light, stiff and responsive race bike; top-spec build
• Cons: Exposed brake hoses; narrow tyres

The Giant TCR has long been a benchmark for race bikes and the ninth generation of the bike remains a top performer.

While the TCR comes in many variants to suit different budgets, the Advanced SL 0 model is unapologetically high-end and its frameset sports an integrated seatpost with a topper rather than a conventional one.

With a full SRAM Red eTap AXS wireless groupset and carbon wheels from Giant's in-house brand Cadex, it's ready to race out of the box and is properly light.

• Read our full Giant TCR Advanced SL 0 Disc review

Bianchi Specialissima

• £11,206 / $11,626 / €11,449 as tested
• Weight: 7.2kg (59cm)
• Pros: Great mix of speed, handling, control and smoothness
• Cons: Wheels are a bit of a disappointment

The Bianchi Specialissima is a bike that's gone from round tubes to aero profiles in its latest iteration, also gaining disc brakes and hiding the hoses, while still ticking the lightweight boxes with a 750g frame and 370g fork. You could lose another 80g by opting for black paint instead of celeste.

Bianchi incorporates Countervail anti-vibration tech into the frame and the bike comes with Shimano Dura-Ace 12-speed shifting and other top-notch kit. The Vision SC 40 carbon tubeless wheels feel a little low-value compared to the rest of the spec though (even at £11,000).

The ride is a mix of responsiveness with great handling, while also composed, smooth and more comfortable than some bikes with tyres wider than the Specialissima's 26mm Pirellis.

• Read our full Bianchi Specialissima review

Cannondale SuperSix Evo Hi-Mod 2

• £8,250 / $8,300 / €8,999 / AU$11,999 as tested
• Weight: 7.57kg (56cm)
• Pros: Excellent handling combined with compliance and stiffness
• Cons: Vision Trimax handlebar may not suit those with smaller hands

Now in its fourth generation, the SuperSix Evo continues to cement itself as one of the best climbing bikes. The new bike takes much of what made the previous versions so well regarded, but removes the often-maligned PF30a press-fit bottom bracket and replaces it with a 68mm BSA threaded model. The front-end design and down tube have also been refined and there's a new proprietary seatpost, too.

Out on the road, the SuperSix Evo balances its inspired handling with compliance and stiffness. It's a particularly adept climber, feeling assured and firm when under the rider and when you want to put the power down, it rockets forward. The new aero seatpost isn't as stiff as you might expect, offering a good amount of buzz-reducing compliance.

The Shimano Ultegra R8100 groupset on this build is BikeRadar's pick of the Japanese brand's latest groupsets and we were impressed by the newly updated flagship HollowGram R-SL 50 wheels, too. Although Cannondale specs Continental Grand Prix 5000 tyres, they're in a 25mm width and we'd be keen to run wider rubber. We also suspect the Vision Trimax won't suit those with smaller hands because the tops are very deep.

• Read our full Cannondale SuperSix Evo Hi-Mod 2 review

Canyon Ultimate CF SLX 8 Di2

• £6,199 / $5,499 / €6,499 / AU$9,899 as tested
• Weight: 7.26kg (L)
• Pros: Cheaper than Ultimate CFR; smother than Ultimate CFR
• Cons: Can’t customise components at purchase

The Canyon Ultimate CF SLX 8 Di2 sits below the range-topping CFR, but our tester found it to be smoother with the same handling and stiffness as the pricier model.

In short, you get better value for money with this Shimano Ultegra-equipped bike and a more balanced ride, earning it a place on the very top shelf of current road bikes.

It’s a shame you can’t customise the build at the point of purchase, which might be an annoyance if you prefer an inline seatpost.

• Read our full Canyon Ultimate CF SLX 8 Di2 review

ENVE Melee (Ultegra Di2 build)

• £5,500 / $5,500 / €5,500 for frame 'chassis' | £10,400 / $12,834 / AU$19,220 as tested
• Weight: 7.8kg (58cm in this example build)
• Pros: Outstanding handling balanced with great comfort and geometry
• Cons: Expensive and you can't buy a full build off the peg

The ENVE Melee took our 2024 Performance Bike of the Year crown, thanks to its outstanding handling and balanced comfort. The brand's second bike after the Custom Road has been aerodynamically optimised, albeit with a slightly taller ride position than you'll find on longer and lower bikes. The Melee also fully integrates its cables and hoses and uses a D-shaped seatpost.

We found the Melee to be one of the easiest-handling race bikes on the market and we were struck by how stable and composed it is in every scenario. It deals with everything with real calmness.

A stable and composed ride can sometimes be a little boring, but there's none of that here. The Melee's reaction to inputs is quick and it's unperturbed by crosswinds.

Unlike the other bikes on this list, the Melee is sold as a 'chassis' – a frame, fork, stem, handlebar, seatpost and thru-axles. You then build the bike up with your preferred electronic groupset , wheels and tyres. Even in a modest build, that means the Melee is far from a cheap proposition, but the ability to mould it into your own makes it a real winner.

Our example build came with a Shimano Ultegra R8100 groupset, and ENVE's Foundation 45 carbon wheels and SES tyres in a 29mm width.

• Read our full ENVE Melee review

Focus Izalco Max 9.7 AXS

• £5,699 / €6,199 / AU$8,999 as tested
• Weight: 7.9kg (L)
• Pros: Racy handling; decent value
• Cons: Grey paint scheme

Similar to many other bikes in this category, Focus has evolved its Izalco platform to be more well-rounded.

The latest version takes both weight and aerodynamics into account, but doesn’t go so far as to ignore practicality completely – the aero cockpit, for example, uses a standard stem and handlebar setup to make fit adjustment and maintenance a little easier.

At 7.9kg (size large), it’s not the lightest bike we’ve ever tested, but this does include 50mm-deep aero wheels and, with a frame weight of just 890g (claimed), it could certainly be lightened up considerably with a few weight-weenie optimisations.

There’s also a slightly cheaper version, the Izalco Max Disc 8.8 , that has Ultegra R8000 mechanical gears, but performed similarly well in our testing.

• Read our full Focus Izalco Max 9.7 AXS review

Lapierre Xelius SL 9.0

• £7,399 / €7,799 as tested
• Weight: 7.5kg (L)
• Pros: Good-value spec; racy geometry
• Cons: Limited sizing; can be twitchy in the wind

Another lightweight bike with aero features, the Xelius nevertheless stands out thanks to the design of its seatstays. The navy blue fade glitter paintjob looks stunning and the racy geometry leads to sharp handling.

If you're at either extreme of the size range, the five sizes available may not work for you though.

The spec is really good for the price, with 12-speed Dura-Ace Di2, a carbon bar and stem and Lapierre's own-brand carbon wheels with 25mm Continental GP5000 tyres that measure 27mm on the 47mm-deep, 21mm internal-width rims.

• Read our full Lapierre Xelius SL 9.0 review

Merida Scultura Team

• £8,000 / €9,999 as tested
• Weight: 7.1kg (M)
• Pros: Great value for a pro-level spec; exciting ride
• Cons: Tricky fit adjustment

The Merida Scultura Team took our 2022 Performance Bike of the Year crown, thanks to its superb, exciting ride and racy handling. It's also great value, with a Shimano Dura-Ace 12-speed groupset, complete with power meter.

Merida has shaved 4.2 per cent from the previous Scultura's drag numbers, while also lowering weight slightly to a claimed 822g for a size M frame. It's well kitted out; we particularly liked the Vision Metron 45 SL wheels, their 1,372g weight leading to low inertia on climbs. They're shod with 28mm Continental GP5000 tyres for a comfortable ride.

The one downside is the lack of narrower options for the integrated bar/stem.

• Read our full Merida Scultura Team review

Specialized S-Works Tarmac SL8 Dura-Ace Di2

• £12,000 / $14,000 / €14,000 / AU$19,900 as tested
• Weight: 6.76kg (56cm)
• Pros: Exceptionally well-balanced handling; aero bike speed
• Cons: Wider tyres would be beneficial; cost

The Specialized S-Works Tarmac SL8 is the brand’s latest flagship road bike.

The SL8 rides like a dream with exceptionally well-balanced handling. It has the speed of an aero bike and it’s a fantastic climber.

Our tester described this no-expense-spared build, featuring Shimano Dura-Ace, as one of the finest race bikes available. But he cautioned that it doesn’t shift the goalposts far enough from the performance of the previous-generation SL7 to warrant upgrading.

• Read our full Specialized S-Works Tarmac SL8 review

Basso Diamante Ultegra Di2

• £7,199 / €8,299 as tested
• Weight: 7.58kg (58cm)
• Pros: Sharp but stable race geometry
• Cons: Long and low cockpit won't work for everyone

The eighth-generation Diamante is a thoroughbred race bike, while remaining classic in its appearance. The tube shapes are rounded, which Basso says is designed to improve stiffness and efficiency, while minimising weight.

The geometry is in pure race bike territory – long and low, so you'll want to have a long think about whether it will work for you and carefully study the geometry chart. That said, in testing we found the Diamante to balance its tactile handling with satisfying stiffness. It's surprisingly comfortable, too, thanks to the slim seatstays and carbon seatpost.

There's little to criticise with the Ultegra Di2 specced. The second-tier groupset delivers identical shifting and braking performance to Dura-Ace with a compelling cost saving. We also rated the Microtech RE38 wheels – many own-brand efforts can vary in design modernity, but these are on the money with a 23mm internal rim width.

• Read our full Basso Diamante Ultegra Di2 review

BMC Teammachine SLR 01 Two

• £9,800 / $10,999 / €10,499 as tested
• Weight: 7.09kg (56cm)
• Pros: Lightweight and fast
• Cons: High price

The latest iteration of BMC’s excellent Teammachine learns lessons from the Timemachine (BMC’s aero road bike) to improve its aerodynamic efficiency, without adding too much weight.

In fact, its 7.09kg weight makes the BMC Teammachine SLR 01 Two one of the lightest bikes on this list, and that’s seriously impressive considering it has aero wheels, disc brakes and plenty of other aero features.

The omission of a Dura-Ace crankset in favour of Rotor is perhaps the only minor criticism we could make of a bike that's otherwise extremely hard to find fault with. There’s no denying it comes at a very high price though.

• Read our full BMC Teammachine SLR 01 Two review

Canyon Ultimate CFR Di2

• £10,399 as tested
• Weight: 6.3kg (L)
• Pros: More versatile than ever
• Cons: Inconsistent spec

The Canyon Ultimate CFR Di2 is tremendously expensive and light at a mere 6.3kg in size large.

The top-dog Ultimate retains its race-winning stiffness, agility and climbing ability while becoming ever more aerodynamic.

However, the shallow-section DT Swiss wheels undermine the Ultimate's versatility, while the Schwalbe Pro One TT tyres are a puncture risk on all but the smoothest roads.

• Read our full Canyon Ultimate CFR Di2 review

Cervélo R5 Disc Force eTap AXS

• £8,599 / €8,799 / $8,400 as tested
• Weight: 7.4kg (56cm)
• Pros: Stiff, but not too stiff frameset; includes power meter
• Cons: Expensive compared to competition

Cervélo claims a 703g frame weight for the latest R5 and, like all Cervélos, there's an aero edge, with Squoval tube profiles and smooth frame edges, while internal hose routing saves a claimed 3W at 48km/h.

The SRAM Force AXS chainset comes with a power meter and the bike is equipped with Reserve 34/37mm carbon wheels, although they're planned to be swapped out for Zipp ZR1 wheels from 2024. The 25mm Vittoria Corsa tyres measure around 29mm on the wide rims.

Cervélo has a reputation for stiff frames, but the latest R5 is slightly less stiff than its predecessor. The geometry is racy, leading to an agile, predictable ride, and the light weight and good power transfer make for sprightly climbing.

• Read our full Cervélo R5 Disc Force eTap AXS review

Colnago C68

• £11,753 / $15,772 / €14,065 as tested
• Weight: 7.3kg (58cm equivalent)
• Pros: Beautifully built; superb handling
• Cons: Saddle should be better at this price

Colnago uses its lugged construction on the C68, but the tube shapes are more reminiscent of the monocoque V3R . Colnago fits its own comfortable one-piece cockpit with hidden cable routing.

The ride position is long and low, although not too aggressive for less flexible riders and leads to great handling from the taut frame.

There's a full Dura-Ace R9200 build, including C50 wheels with 28mm Pirelli tyres, although the Prologo saddle isn't the range-topping carbon-railed version. It's a great bike that merits its superbike rating.

• Read our full Colnago C68 review

Colnago V4RS

• £5,000 / €12,630 as tested (UK price is for frameset only)
• Weight: 7.23kg (57cm)
• Pros: Pinpoint handling
• Cons: Seriously expensive

Ridden by UAE Team Emirates (and perhaps most importantly) Tadej Pogačar, the V4RS is Colnago's monocoque carbon race bike, where a balance of lightness, stiffness and speed is the name of the game.

Colnago claims the V4RS is 3 per cent more aerodynamic than the outgoing V3RS and the new CC01 cockpit alone is said to be 16 per cent more aerodynamic. There are some new tube shapes too, with a reprofiled head tube, although many will be glad to hear the brand has reverted back to a round steerer tube.

Out on the road, the V4RS is unerringly poised, with direct handling and sharpness. It felt particularly confident on descents, driving hard into an apex and the bottom bracket laps up power when climbing, the bike keen to accelerate when you get out of the saddle.

• Read our full Colnago V4RS review

Giant TCR Advanced Pro 2 Disc

• £2,999 / $5,199 / €3,100 as tested
• Weight: 7.87kg (M/L)
• Pros: Solid all-round spec; lively ride quality; generous tyre clearance
• Cons: Limits aftermarket upgrades

The legendary TCR has finally gone aero, but that doesn’t mean a huge increase in weight, fortunately.

At 7.87kg, it’s not the lightest bike on this list, but it’s very competitive in its price range and could likely be lightened considerably with some component upgrades.

It also offers a noticeably smooth ride, with confident handling and clearance for up to 32mm tyres, which is very welcome.

Giant’s sister company Liv offers a women's version called the Langma Advanced Pro Disc, which is one of the best women's road bikes .

• Read our full Giant TCR Advanced Pro 2 Disc review

Scott Addict RC 10

• £5,949 / $8,000 / €6,599 as tested
• Weight: 7.9kg (56cm)
• Pros: Quality ride; power meter
• Cons: Middling wheels and mediocre tyres

The Scott Addict marries sharp handling with a predictable and compliant ride quality that's similar to the Cervélo R5. There's integrated cabling that works for mechanical and wired electronic, as well as wireless shifting, and it's reasonably easy to work on.

Scott includes a power meter with the SRAM Force AXS electronic groupset and you get decent, if not outstanding, Syncros Capital 1.0 35 Disc wheels with a claimed weight of 1,574g a pair.

We were disappointed with the fitted Schwalbe One TLE tyres though, with their higher rolling resistance than many of the best road bike tyres . Tyre clearance is a little narrow at 28mm too.

Although this mid-spec Addict weighs just under 8kg, you can spend a lot more and get the bike's claimed weight down to 6.7kg.

• Read our full Scott Addict RC 10 review

Specialized Aethos Comp

• £4,500 / $5,000 / €5,400 / AU$6,900 as tested
• Weight: 8.2kg (58cm)
• Pros: Rapid handling, but stable ride quality; climbs well
• Cons: Wheelset and tyres limit performance

Although the Comp spec of the Specialized Aethos weighs over 8kg, the top-spec S-Works Aethos brings that down to a claimed sub-6kg, definitely earning a place on our lightweight bikes list. The classic frame profile with round tubes goes against the aero-is-everything modern trend.

The Comp uses a lower-spec carbon than the S-Works, but still has a 700g frame weight and comes with a SRAM Rival AXS groupset and lower-priced, heavier wheels. These make it feel less skittish than the S-Works bike, while it retains its rapid handling and shares its geometry with the Tarmac SL7. It still feels light when climbing too.

• Read our full Specialized Aethos Comp review

Specialized S-Works Tarmac SL7

• £10,500 / $12,000 / €11,499 / AU$18,000 as tested
• Weight: 6.7kg (54cm)
• Pros: Stiff, fast and responsive
• Cons: Ride might be too racy for some; that price tag

The Specialized Tarmac SL7 has now been replaced by the Tarmac SL8, but you can still find this bike for sale.

The Tarmac SL7 is disc-only and has clearance for 32mm tyres. It's a fast and uncompromising race bike that will delight riders who can kick out big power numbers.

In its halo S-Works spec, this is a seriously expensive bike, but more affordable models are available, with the second-tier frame claimed to weigh a respectable 920g.

• Read our full Specialized S-Works Tarmac SL7 review

Trek Emonda SL 6 Pro

• £3,350 / $3,799 / €3,799 / AU$5,499 as tested
• Weight: 8.13kg (56cm)
• Pros: Stiff, exciting ride; great-quality components
• Cons: 25mm tyres harm performance; uncompetitive weight

In line with market trends, Trek has amended the Emonda’s design parameters to encompass a broader, all-round riding style, with the obligatory disc brakes and aero optimisation.

This does mean builds won’t quite be able to match the positively feathery lows of previous models , but Trek is, unsurprisingly, adamant they are faster most of the time. Our tester broadly agrees with this sentiment too, heaping praise on the Emonda's speed and stiffness.

It’s also worth considering Trek’s beautiful Emonda ALR . Not only are there rim and disc brake versions of that frame (as things stand), but it’s also substantially cheaper. We think it’s an absolute peach of a bike.

Trek says the Emonda is now a unisex bike, and offers a broad range of sizes (from 47cm to 65cm) with the intention of fitting all different kinds of cyclists.

• Read our full Trek Emonda SL 6 Pro review

What we've included (and what we haven't)

This buyer's guide features lightweight bikes at a range of prices, reviewed by BikeRadar and having scored at least four stars in our testing.

While lighter bikes may be available (including custom builds and different models within a given manufacturer's range), these are bikes we have tried and tested, and can confidently vouch for as a result.

Buyer’s guide to climbing bikes

It perhaps goes without saying, but when you’re riding uphill, gravity is always trying to pull you back down.

Reducing the total rider plus bike system weight means less energy (or power , in cycling parlance) is required to maintain a given speed while climbing.

Therefore, if you want to ride uphill faster, or simply make the hills a little easier, a lightweight bike helps a lot.

It’s for this reason we see hill-climb obsessives chopping and changing practically every component to bring their overall bike weight down to its lowest possible limit.

The only issues are that high-end, lightweight bikes and parts can be eye-wateringly expensive, and the weight-weenie bug can be hard to shake once you get started. However, some of the best road bikes under £3,000 are good for climbing.

Cheaper still is improving your power-to-weight ratio . You can do this by becoming more powerful at the same weight or losing weight through cycling and maintaining power.

Top-quality carbon fibre is prized for its incredible stiffness-to-weight ratio, and rightly so – this is the reason it’s used in Formula One. If you can afford it, the lightest bikes and parts will almost always be made out of high-end carbon fibre.

At the lower end though, good aluminium is competitive with, or even better than, cheap carbon fibre. That applies not just to weight and stiffness, but also ride quality and strength.

The very last of those characteristics is also a general worry for ultra-lightweight carbon fibre frames and parts. You have to be very careful about sticking to recommended weight, torque and clamping specs, or else it’s very easy to break these feathery items.

Aero vs. weight for climbing

Until fairly recently, climbing bikes made no concessions to aerodynamics, leaving drag-reduction to the best aero road bikes . But with the rise of computer modelling, on-bike aero sensors and other advanced testing techniques, this has all changed.

Even dedicated climbing bikes are now launching, with brands touting their aerodynamic efficiency.

Take the Trek Emonda , for example. Trek says it has been designed specifically for the rigours of iconic Tour de France climbs such as Alpe d’Huez (a 13.85km monster in the French Alps), yet still features extensive aero treatment.

True hill climb aficionados will no doubt be tearing their hair out at this point, exclaiming ‘anything under 10 per cent isn’t even a proper hill anyway!’, but if you want to go fast, aero always matters, regardless of the gradient.

It's true that aerodynamic drag becomes a smaller part of the equation as gradients increase in severity, but the absolute amount of air resistance you experience remains the same for any given speed.

On top of that, the power to overcome any increase in air resistance is proportional to the cube of speed. So, if you want to ride your bicycle twice as fast, you’ll need eight times more power to overcome the extra drag force, unless you can reduce your aerodynamic drag.

In an ideal world, then, you want a bike that’s both lightweight and aero for smashing hills.

"Weight weenies should be Crr weenies"

So said Robert Chung, Professor and Theoretical Mathematical Demographer at the University of California-Berkeley. Chung is perhaps most famous for devising the ‘Chung Method’ of calculating aerodynamic drag, but he also reminds us of the importance of not ignoring rolling resistance.

Using a power equation for wheeled vehicles (such as the one found at www.kreuzotter.de ), he showed that even a relatively small difference in rolling resistance (Crr stands for 'coefficient of rolling resistance') can be worth as much as large changes in weight, even on steep gradients.

Chung's graph plots the difference in Crr between Continental’s GP4000S II and GP5000 tyres in terms of the equivalent efficiency found through weight loss on different gradients.

On a flat road, it’s clear that even a relatively small decrease in rolling resistance is worth more than practically any increase in weight. What’s really interesting to note though, is that changing from a GP4000 to a GP5000 is still worth more than 500g of extra mass even on a 10 per cent slope.

Yes, that’s right; the small difference in rolling resistance between two of the best road bikes tyres can have a greater effect on your efficiency than 500g of extra weight even on a 10 per cent slope, and that equivalent mass penalty only increases as the gradient gets shallower. On a 6 per cent slope, the difference is equivalent to a kilogram of extra mass.

The key takeaway is that you shouldn’t just look at weight figures when shopping for tyres. The differences in rolling resistance between tyres will be worth far more to your climbing speed than any minor weight variations.

Gearing and cadence when climbing

Some riders apparently enjoy using singlespeed or even fixed-gear bikes for climbing hills . But most people are going to want bike gears .

For a long time though, back in the days when riders only had five or so cogs on their cassette to choose from, gears such as 42×21 were considered adequate for climbing mountains.

Thankfully, though, things have moved on and we now have access to compact/sub-compact chainsets , long-cage rear derailleurs and much larger bike cassettes .

Used together, these can allow practically anyone to spin up steep climbs at a comfortable cycling cadence , rather than turning them into a series of leg presses.

Muscling up a steep hill in a massive gear might feel heroic, but it’s probably slower and it’s costing you more energy too, as anyone with a power meter will be able to attest to. These days, even the pros know you need to gear down when the road goes up .

Rim or disc brakes

Another thorny issue. In our opinion, there are two answers to the bike brakes debates – a simple one and a nuanced one.

The simple answer is that rim brakes are, generally, lighter, and therefore are better for climbing bikes .

There's a more nuanced answer, however. While disc-brake equipped bikes generally come with a weight penalty (though this is becoming harder to measure because, despite what we wrote in 2017 , new high-end rim brake road bikes are uncommon), the advantage of better braking will be keenly felt on the way down the hills.

If the only thing you care about is going uphill as fast as possible, then rim brakes could still be the right choice. Otherwise, the advantages of road disc brakes might tip the balance.

Share this article

Senior technical writer

• Terms & Conditions
• Subscribe to our magazines
• Manage preferences

Cycle Travel Overload

Bikepacking & Adventure Cycling

Canyon Grail Vs Trek Checkpoint

The big brand gravel bike battle! Canyon vs Trek! Which gravel bike is best? We are going to compare these two iconic gravel bikes side by side and see what the difference is between each. When it comes to price the Grail ranges from $2,299 to $9,549 while the Checkpoint ranges from $2,499.99 to $12,249.99 . But what really is the difference and which one is best for you and your riding goals?

There are so many different models to choose from for each bike. For this article, we have taken their mid-range (best bang for buck option as a main comparison. Instead of comparing all models together.)

The Canyon Grail was built to be a bike that maintains similar performance and speed to a road bike on asphalt while also offering the comfort and control, a road bike may lack, on gravel.

When comparing the Canyon Grail CF SL 8 Model to the Trek Checkpoint SL 5 model, (which both cost the same $4,499, the Canyon Grail is 700 grams / 1.54 pounds lighter and more focused on speed and performance when comparing the geometry of both bikes. Meaning the Checkpoint is more comfortable the longer you stay in the saddle, thanks to a more upright stack/reach ratio. The Trek also seems to offer more mounting options to carry all the necessary gear you may need for a minimal bikepacking trip.

When it comes to tire clearance the Grail can fit up to 42 mm while the Checkpoint fits 45mm x 700c or 2.1″ (which is approx 53 mm) x 650b wheels. The Trek has clearance for slightly wider tires which further lends itself to be the superior bike when it comes to all-around adventure.

Both are similar when it comes to gearing (both with 2×11 GRX 800 drivetrains) and hydraulic disc brakes. Different tires with the same 40 mm width, with the Grail on Schwalbe G-One R 40mm and Checkpoint on Bontrager GR1 Team Issue 700c x 40 mm tires.

When taking a look at these bikes’ gearing we found that the Checkpoint has 46-30T crank vs the Grails 48-31T crank and both bikes have 11-34T cassettes in the rear. Both with the same 700c x 40 mm tires. We can calculate that the Checkpoint has a better climbing gear of 24.32″ while the Grail has 25.15″. Meaning that the Checkpoint is slightly more capable when it comes to climbing especially if you plan to use the bike for bikepacking with gear. When it comes to the largest gear is often attributed to riding fast on the flats or riding downhill. The Grail offers a 120.50″ vs the Checkpoints 115.53″, meaning the Grail offers more gearing for those fast sections.

Compare these bikes to the Cannondale Topstone!

Canyon Grail Vs Cannondale Topstone

Cannondale Topstone Vs Trek Checkpoint

The main difference is in the bike’s geometries. With the Grail with a more aggressive stack/reach ratio (1.27 vs 1.42), the chainstay is 10 mm longer on the Checkpoint and Wheelbase is 12 mm longer too. Again making for a more planted feel when under a load. The trail is 4mm longer on the Checkpoint and the standover height is around 45 mm lower than the Checkpoint. However, the BB Drop and BB Heights are very close with a 1 mm difference. This data is for both medium-sized bikes.

Based on the above information we can conclude that the Checkpoint is better suited for gravel adventure riding where comfort and gear-carrying ability are a main priority, which are some of the main things to look for in an adventure gravel bike. The Grail seems better suited as a gravel racing bike to ride nothing but fast!

Canyon Grail

Cover huge distances at speed and in comfort (as stated by Canyon but when compared to the Checkpoint simply due to the much lower stack/reach comfort would be sacrificed over the long haul). However, that is the promise by Canyon with their Grail gravel bike.

It is the ultimate all-rounder, offering road bike speed, all-terrain control, and grip with stable but also agile handling. The CF SLX model is designed to win races, while they also offer other more accessible models if you just want to ride fast and save some coin.

The Grail is more focused on speed and performance on gravel terrain compared to the more all-rounder/adventure cargo-carrying friendly Checkpoint. The Grail has been used in some long-distance endurance events. Featuring a spot amongst some of the  fastest gravel bikes . The Grail comes in 12 different build options including women’s gravel bikes.

Trek Checkpoint

Every gravel grinder and their dog seem to have one of these bikes. So that means they are a great carbon gravel bike option, right? The main feature of the Checkpoint is the lightweight OCLV Carbon frame with IsoSpeed, a decoupler at the top tube/seat tube junction that provides additional compliance over rough terrain so you can stay stronger for longer. A carbon gravel bike made for epic all-road adventures. Explore all models here .

The Checkpoint is the best all-rounder out of the two. More adventure-focused than the Grail, it’s still fast, but more importantly comfortable and smooth, and its versatile design ensures that you’ll reach all the places you dream of exploring on two wheels. If you want to mostly explore (I mean why else would you get a gravel bike?) Then the Checkpoint would be the best option .

Geometry – Grail Vs Checkpoint

Geometry can play a big part in the difference between how a bike rides and feels. It is definitely something to consider when buying a bike. At first impressions, I was expecting the Grail to be more of a road bike geometry. And that provided to be true with the slightly shorter chainstay and wheelbase for more responsive and snappy control. But all the measurements below are in mm and are for both medium-sized bikes. We can clearly see in the dark red that the Checkpoint is the more upright and therefore comfortable and adventure-focused bike out of the two.

Want to learn more about understanding bike geometry? Read this article which goes through all the jargon and what it means for a comfortable ride!

The main difference between the two bikes is the stack/reach ratio, being much more aggressive on the Grail. Meaning the Checkpoint is better suited for a more upright riding position adding more comfort in the saddle for those long adventures. This would make the Grail more efficient and faster to ride.

Along with this the Chainstay and Wheelbase are longer on the Checkpoint making it feel a little more planted for loaded adventures. And making the Grail a better bike for speed and performance. You want a shorter chainstay in the rear for quick and snappy bike control.

If you plan to mostly go on adventures with gear the Checkpoint is a no-brainer . But if you are looking for a speedy gravel bike that will keep up with your roadie mates it’s definitely the Grail. People still use the Grail for bikepacking too. However mostly pavement bikepacking with some light gravel. You just benefit a little more with the Checkpoint for bikepacking thanks to its more adventure-focused geometry for stability and comfort. Along with mounts on the forks.

If you plan to cart gear and use your bike for transporting cargo in the form of bikepacking bags. You might be better off with the Checkpoint for its longer wheelbase to avoid heel striking when compared to a shorter wheelbase on the Grail. This longer wheelbase adds better overall stability when the bike is under more of a load.

It seems if you are coming from a roadie background and are looking for a bike with larger tire clearance the Grail is your go-to. Allowing you to maintain the performance of a road bike but have the ability to ride gravel more comfortably and efficiently, compared to a road bike.

But if you want a gravel bike that can ride road just as well as gravel but also take you on bikepacking trips with reasonable comfortability. The Trek Checkpoint is the do-it-all solution out of the two bikes .

However, both bikes are amazing in their own right. And at times it can be difficult to recommend one bike over the other when they are both great bikes and offer something special. But I hope this article clears up some questions you might have had.

About The Author

Codey Orgill, a seasoned bicycle adventurer, has been exploring the world on two wheels for over 10 years. Since embarking on his initial cycling journey, Codey Orgill has traversed numerous countries, experiencing a series of epic adventures.

See author's posts

• Bikepacking Videos
• Adventure Stories
• Latest Arrivals
• Bikepacking Bags
• Camping Gear
• Accessories
• Rigid & Plus Bikes
• Drop Bar MTB
• Full Suspension
• Folding Bikes
• Cargo Bikes
• Commuter Bikes
• Bike vs Bike
• Bike Builds
• Handbuilt Bikes
• New Zealand
• United States
• Bikepacking Guides
• Bikepacking Gear Lists
• Bikepacking Food / Hydration
• Navigation & Route Planning
• Capturing The Adventure
• About Codey
• Work With Me

Related Post

Kona sutra ltd review – bikepacking bike, canyon grail vs endurace, giant revolt vs defy : what’s the difference, marin nicasio vs gestalt – breaking down the differences, specialized rockhopper vs trek marlin: which is the best hardtail, specialized diverge vs roubaix.

Specialized vs Trek Road Bikes: My Comparison Guide

So you’re interested in comparing the road bike ranges of Trek and Specialized, huh?

Well, you’ve come to the right… oh wait, you’re not?

No matter. I’m going to write about it anyway.

I’m interested and that’s all that matters (and you may find it useful, entertaining, a useful sleep aid). Onward!

This post contains affiliate links. If you click and buy something, I may get a commission.

Why Specialized and Trek For This Special Comparison, Mont?

Well, I’ve ridden a Trek carbon road bike for these past (nearly) six years and I’ve been very happy with it. I’d certainly consider buying another one.

We’ll get onto this, but one of the (less rational) reasons for buying my bike (the Domane) was that it was both an ‘endurance’ bike (built for the less fit who want a more comfortable ride) and cool* (it was the bike Fabian Cancellara would use to ride Paris-Roubaix).

(* I … M … H … O)

Things have moved on slightly (‘endurance’ and all out racing bikes have converged somewhat), but Specialized also had (still have) a cool ‘endurance’ bike (i.e. aimed at the less flexible gent) that evoked the spring classics: the Specialized Roubaix – the clue’s in the title.

So Specialized remains the bike manufacturer I almost went for (the one that got away).

Other Slightly Related Facts

I did end up buying a Specialized steed a year after the conclusion of my endurance bike purchasing quest.

Only it was a 20″ Specialized Hotrock hardtail mountain bike for my son. Whilst an excellent bike, less relevant for this post.

Finally, true fact, the colour scheme for this ‘ere blog, which I updated last year is based on my current favourite team jersey: the Trek-Segafredo women’s kit (circa 2019).

So Let’s Start With The Basics

Both Trek and Specialized are US manufacturers.

Trek was founded in 1976 in Waterloo, Wisconsin by Richard Burke, owner of an appliance distribution business, and Bevil Hogg, a bike shop owner. As a lifelong fan of Lord Wellington and Abba (both of who loved distributing appliances), this appeals to me.

The company started life in a barn , a building which I recall from an episode of the Cycling Tips podcast, Trek still keeps as part of its current ‘campus’.

(Come on, that’s history, innit.)

The company (as far as I can tell) continues to be owned by the family of the original founders, and is run by John Burke, son of Richard.

Specialized was founded in 1974, two years earlier than Trek, by Mike Sinyard. Initially Sinyard imported Italian bike parts that he’d discovered on his bike travels, but by 1981, Specialized had started making its own bikes, with one of the first being the Allez road bike*.

(* Wait! They still make the Allez, all these years later. Amazing…).

The company is 49%-owned by Merida, a Taiwanese firm that also make bikes. I think I probably knew this (prior to undertaking the ‘sort-of-research’ for this post) but was more surprised to discover that it made the acquisition in 2001. Anyway, Sinyard remains CEO.

Where Do Trek and Specialized Make Their Bikes?

Both companies undertake a large amount of their manufacturing overseas. It’s difficult (or impossible) to get precise figures as both are privately owned.

I can see why companies keep this information to themselves. When she was standing for political office a few years ago, the opponents of Mary Burke (of the Trek family) focused heavily on the fact that Trek bikes were made overseas and not supporting American jobs…

Trek sells in the millions of bikes per year (not all road bikes), of which maybe 10,000 of the really high end ones are manufactured in the US. Whilst much of the overseas production is (I think) in China, it also manufactures in Holland and Germany.

According to this article (which sounds legit but don’t believe everything you read on the internet, kids), all Specialized bikes are made in Asia, with key suppliers being Merida (makes sense), Giant and ‘Ideal’ (?!?)

Summary of the two ranges

I doubt you came here just for the history and some speculation over manufacturing facilities (though you should be aware that I do have actually have a history degree).

Wherez arez the bikez.

I thought I’d try to break down the road bike ranges of each company to help understand what compares with what. I could try to do that for their mountain bikes as well, but with my lack of knowledge on that front, I’d quickly be well over my skis. Look for that info elsewhere.

Similarly for their hybrid, e-bikes and other random ranges, well… whatever.

Trying to boil it down, here is a list of the road bike model ‘families’ made by each company, classified by the target sub-segment of the roadie market:

Trek’s Road Bike Range

• Aluminium (beginner/budget) road bike: aluminium versions of the Domane and Emonda
• Endurance (relaxed fit): Domane
• Lightweight (racey climby): Emonda
• Aero road (as opposed to pure aero): Madone
• Gravel (adventure): Checkpoint, Boone and Crockett (not a 1960s group of protest musicians)

Here’s a link to the full range of Trek’s road bikes , in case you can’t work out how to Google.

Specialized’s Road Bike Range

• Aluminium (beginner/budget) road bike: Allez
• Endurance (relaxed fit): Roubaix
• Lightweight (racey climby): Tarmac
• Aero road (as opposed to pure aero): Venge
• Gravel (adventure): Diverge

And here’s a cheeky link to the Specialized website , so you can see all the up-to-date variants.

How Do Trek And Specialized Denote Better Bikes (Model Naming Conventions)?

This is not always an exact science, as specifications can vary as models can be updated each year.

(Inexact science is my jam…)

Trek signal different levels of specification, higher quality (or lighter) frames, additional expensive features, through a combination of numbers (mainly) and letters (to a limited degree).

Higher numbers denote a higher specc’ed bike. The current Domane SL 5 has a Shimano 105 groupset. The SL 6 has Ultegra. Top of the range, the SLR 9 has full Shimano Dura-Ace Di2 electronic gears.

Trek bikes at the lower end of the price scale generally have the ‘SL’ designation (unless they’re aluminium frames, in which case they’re ‘AL’). I query if all the bikes in a range can be Super Light (or superleggara ) but there you go.

At the upper end an R is added, to arrive at SLR (I’m guessing Super Light Race). The key difference between SL and SLR bikes is the frame.

Using the Domane as an example, the SLR frame has adjustable resistance settings on the Isospeed ‘suspension’ at the front and rear of the bike. The SL frame doesn’t (you’ll get the level of resistance you’re given).

The Emonda SL frame is made from 500 series OCLV* carbon and weighs 1.68kg. The SLR version is upgraded to 700 series OCLV and weighs 1.19kg.

(* Optimum Compaction Low Void, in case you’re wondering…)

Specialized (thankfully) adopt a slightly more straightforward forward approach to naming their bikes.

Generally speaking, the basic version is just called the, er, name. So the basic Specialized Roubaix is called the… Roubaix.

Then as you go up the spec tree (this monkey loves climbing the spec tree), you have the following suffixes:

Finally, at the top end, presumably in a nod to Lockheed’s advanced aircraft development arm (Skunk Works), Specialized does an ‘S-Works’ version of each bike (although ‘S-Works’ goes at the start, i.e. ‘S-Works Roubaix’ rather than ‘Specialized Roubaix S-Works’…).

Want To See More Photos Of Beautiful Trek and Specialized Road Bikes?

Of course you do.

The websites of both Trek and Specialized do a fine job of showing off their bikes to the fullest.

I ride a Trek Domane as my main road bike. I *love* the look of the new Emonda (shown here). Gold though...?

I am rather partial to the S-Works Tarmac (pictured here), if Specialized want to send me one to review....

Well there is no conclusion, is there?

Because I haven’t finished.

The first draft of this post (which wasn’t even finished) was knocking on 5,000 words. Too much for even the most patient blogfans to bear.

I’ve broken it down into what looks like four future posts, each one dealing with a different bike category. So I’ll compare the Trek Emonda with the Specialized Tarmac, the Madone with the Venge. You get the idea.

Update: I’m pleased to report that I’ve published the Trek/Specialized endurance bike comparison – so now you can read it:

• Trek Domane vs Specialized Roubaix: Endurance Road Bike Comparison  

Now, quick show of hands.

Who here owns a Trek road bike or a Specialized? Which one? What are your thoughts and would recommend the one you’ve got?

Let me know in the comments section below.

Cheers Monty

Subscribe to Sportive Cyclist

I write entertaining articles about road cycling: gear reviews, training advice. All from a MAMIL perspective. Subscribe below and I will send you enjoyable and helpful cyclo-info straight to your inbox.

33 thoughts on “Specialized vs Trek Road Bikes: My Comparison Guide”

I have 2013 S Roubaix and love it. Not sure I would purchase the latest model, everything seems to be getting to ‘technical’ and awkward to fix out on the road. I like to keep things simple stupid.

2016 Roubaix with 105 was my first drop bar bike, loved it but over time it became clear I needed a size 58 rather than the 61. Replaced it with a 2018 Roubaix and got it pro fitted, it’s amazing now. Followed up with a 2018 Diverge E5 to have an aluminum bike without the future shock but with the same fitting for dog trailer pulling, winter, and trainer use (SUPER similar geometry to the Roubaix)

I’ve been really happy with them, and never felt like it was holding me back compared to a Tarmac. They can be set up similar regardless, and the accumulated fatigue of chip seal around here makes the Roubaix a no brainer.

How tall are you? I’ve been waffling about a 58

Hi Jonathan – I’m between 5’9 and 5’10. Hope that helps!

I have a 2019 Roubaix Expert.

IT’S FABULOUS!!!!!

2018 Specialized Allez Sport. My first bike since I was a kid, so I don’t have much to compare it to, but it seems fast enough (I have a couple KOMs locally) and is comfortable at a century so nothing to complain about. It could be a little lighter, I’ve been thinking of upgrading and keeping the Allez for commuting but it will be hard to convince the wife it is a worthwhile expense.

Trek Domane. Great bike.

I have a Trek Checkpoint 5.0 and a Specialized Diverge Sport. I like both bikes. As a general comment, the Trek is heavier than the Specialized. So when you are buying at the bottom price of each carbon model, Trek seems to go for durability and flexibility of use over lightweight. By the way, my Checkpoint was made by Giant in Taiwan (on the bike box).

I finished 4 RAAM times on a Specialized S-Works Roubaix – loved it ; very comfortable to ride for hours, but slow and hard to ride fast. Just did RAW on my Trek Emonda – the best! Super light and fast. Actually, I love both of these bikes – there are just very different.

Had a 2013 Roubaix for a couple of years, loved it, did some 100 milers and the Grand Depart 2019 for Prostate Cancer UK 130 miles including cobbles. Last ride on Doris (the Roubaix) was Revolve 24 at Brands Hatch, again she performed well. I now have a 2016 Tarmac SL3 Expert, early days but loving the sportier geometry and the ability to put the power down.

I have a 2014 Trek Domane 4.5 which I purchased after a bike fit with my Boardman Team Carbon demonstrated that I needed a smaller bike. If this sounds familiar I went for the bike fit after reading your blog as I prepared for Ride London – just as you did a year before! I love this bike and have rode Ride London in 2014, Velothon Wales in 2015, Ride London 46 in 2016 and Velo Birmingham in 2017 numerous 100Km plus rides. I must have ridden well over 4000 miles. BUT – this year I was due to ride it on Ride London again. Following a gear cable break on a training ride I discovered play in the cranks and this was traced to a siezed BB bearing which was spinning in the frame and had worn the BB housing. This required a return of the frame to Trek for a repair which they would not do under the lifetime warranty- apparently this is wear and tear. The repair wasn’t cheap but wasn’t as bad as I first feared but couldn’t be done in time for this years Ride London. So I’d be interested to know what maintenance regime other Trek users have used to avoid this happening to them. With the Trek unavailable for RL this year used a smaller 2014 Boardman Team Carbon which I bought at the end of 2014 for £750 when it was end of line at Halfords, an absolute bargain and a third of the price of the Trek. Upgraded from 10-speed 105 to 11 speed Ultegra, and getting it set up properly for me it is just as good as the Trek and climbs better although is perhaps a little harsher on rough roads. I use Specialised Toupe saddles on all my bikes though!

I have a 2017 Trek Domane SL7 (Ultegra Di2) for my normal road bike. I’ve updated it in a few places, Deda Zero 100 bars and Stem, Hunt wheels with Swalbe Pro one tubeless tires, Absolute Black Oval chainrings,Selle Italia Superflow SLR saddle. Weight saved was 0.8KG. Overall love my Domane, a much better ride on the welsh pothole riddled roads than previous bikes. Will use it on next years Ride London (assuming I get a place) rather than my Look Huez (great as a lightweight climbing bike for the welsh hills).

I had a 2015 Specialized Roubaix expert. It was good. Made the mistake of test riding a 2018 Roubaix Comp with Future Shock. First ride not much difference. We changed the shock spring from the stiffest to lightest. Night and day better. This bike floats over bumps compared to my previous Roubaix. It’s quick and fast. The 28 tires are excellent too.

Thanks for the great post.

After laboring (or “labouring” if you are in Europe) – or really obsessing – about my “retirement” bike, I finally chose the 2019 Specialized Tarmac Pro frameset (my first full carbon bike was the first iteration of the carbon Tarmac – so many decades ago!) I chose this over the Trek Domane SLR, and the Cervelo S-3 for its slight weight advantage and because it seemed to have the best overall reviews in terms of speed, weight and comfort. As I still race in age-grouped triathlons and aquabikes, but am now at an age when a full-on tri frame is too jarring, the last attribute was important.

Simply put, I love this bike. Though the others are amazing in their own right, the Tarmac has offered the speed and comfort that I longed for. I have raced it (including an aquabike with a 26-mile bike leg, and the one-person sprint tri that I did yesterday, (I came in first on that one, ) it has exceeded my expectations and wishes. It is built with Sram Etap, Reynolds Attack wheels (with 25mm tubeless tires,) a Zipp cockpit, and the stupidly expensive s-works saddle the name of which I have forgotten, but which is heaven to sit on.

I choose the 2017 Specialized Roubaix sport w/105 . Added Zipp’s course 30 wheel set W/ S-Work 28mm tires. this year Absolute black oval chain ring sub compact 32/48 for lots of climbing and 34/11 in the rear. I love the ride and the feel of the bike wish I could afford the S Works Roubaix

First road bike was an Allez and loved it several bikes and many years later I have a Roubaix Comp. This has to be the best bike I have ridden the perfect balance of comfort and pace, ok younger legs might get better speed out of a Tarmac, loving it.

I have a 2017 Roubaix with Specialized’s future shock suspension and at 50 years old appreciate that little bit of comfort. The rest of the standard bike is pretty good too

I’m not a top-end rider. I don’t race or compete at all, I’m just an average guy that likes to ride. I owned a Specialized hybrid and it was a very good bike. When I decided I wanted a road bike I found both Specialized and Trek lacking unless you were willing to spend a *lot* of money. My preference was a road bike with a Shimano 105 group set. While both Specialized and Trek advertized a 105 group set, both were only partially 105’s. Many of the components were not 105’s ( read “less expensive”). I wanted to by from an American manufacturer (I live in America), but I bought a bike from a German manufacturer (Bulls). The Bulls bike had 105 components across the board and cost about 1/2 (yes, a full half) of the closest equivalent Specialized or Trek. In my opinion, Specialized and Trek make some very good bikes, but they are more expensive.

I have a Specialized Roubaix Sport 2017 model which I bought to do Ride London 100 in August this year. My first carbon bike. I bought it on recomendation from a work colleague and I love it. Such a good comfortable bike. I had a professional fit on your recomendation Monty. 105 groupset. I put a 34/11 cassette on the rear to help me up the hills in the peak district. Don’t believe Shimano. 105 can take a 34 rear cog without any adjustment. All in all very happy.

Despite all the advice regarding Disk brakes I went for the Trek Emonda SL7 Disk, purchased at the end of May this year (2019) and not at all what I set out to buy. I use a Spa Audax Ti bike for winter and commuting so have only done 506 miles so far but have to say that the SL7 has exceeded my expectations in many areas including the Disk brakes. The bike was set up with data from a previous Retul bike fit in 2016 done on a Bianchi Infinito CV (loaned to me for a couple of years by my Son) and from the beginning has given me pain free cycling, I do intend to have another Retul fit done on the Trek when time and money allows. I would not hesitate to recommend both Trek as the manufacturer and the SL7 Disk as a fast, sporty climber that ticks many of the “Endurance” qualities along with a comfortable and smooth ride.

Trek Emonda ALR 5, this is my first bike since my Schwinn Varsity when I was a kid a long time ago. So not much to compare to, it goes up hills really nice, around turns with confidence. If I want to reduce any weight, the best way would be to lighten the rider not the bike! I think it is lightweight, had several people have asked if it is carbon, the welds are great. I ride it on the road and rail trails.

I’ve got a Trek Domane 5.2, 2014 vintage, replacing a Cannondale R2.8 that I really liked. But I was really amazed at the differences in the old Dale vs. the Trek. I had ridden several other bikes before selecting the Domane and all the others seemed to be just a newer version of the Dale, the trek felt like an actual upgrade beyond just newer.

Finally, I’ll be expecting Mont to compile these comments and add these survey notes to one of the remaining 3 posts : )

iI am a vintage weekend warrior (so to speak) ie +50 , i bought a Trek Emonda SL6 with upgraded Mavic wheel set about three years ago – best bike I have had ! especially on the hilly bits. Before this i was ( in recent times anyhow) a Specialized convert with an aluminium Allez followed by a carbon Roubaix – both great bikes

Thanks for posting this blog.. I’m recently getting back into road biking after over 20 years away from it when i was in college riding my, then at the time, Bianchi race bike. I’m been riding pretty regularly recently and just did a recent sportive, and looking to upgrade my bike, originally was thinking ‘endurance’ but others in my ‘sportive team’ all ride the ‘race’ bikes. Been back and forth between Trek Emonda vs Cannondale Supersix / CAAD13, as well as carbon vs aluminium. Specialized keeps coming up in my research but not sold by my LBS. Just asking out of curiosity and because I’m really interested in learning more.. 1) why you didn’t include Cannondale in your blog.. I thought this would have been a natural comparison in the mix (is there a reason i should discount Cannondale) 2) are any bikes still manufactured in the US by Trek and Specialized?… and more specifically the models you listed above? This would be helpful as I continue my search for my next bike and value the opinion in the other comments above. Cheers!

Hi Monty Firstly love your work please keep it up especially the videos, great fun 👍

I missed this last year so apologies

I spent a year waiting for the new Roubaix to be released in Australia and went to buy one May 2019 I wanted the Di2 version with a 61cm frame Well the only color Specialized would offer was Matt black I’m not a drug dealer so why would I want s stealth matt black bike

My local bike shop where amazing, they asked Specialized to offer another color anything but black but no luck After a month or so of trying the bike shop even offered to paint the bike for me

At that point I decided Specialized did not deserve my $6000 and purchased a Cervelo R3 which I am really happy with in fluro green 😎

May be you could do a blog on bike color/ paint jobs in the future

Keep up the great work Safe riding

KS Brisbane AUS

Thanks KS. Glad you’re enjoying the blog and the vids. That’s great to hear. I’ll keep the bike colour topic in mind for future content. Cheers, Monty

Kinda late, but just reading this. The Trek Domane versus S Works Roubaix argument. I have a 2012 Domane 6.1 P1 with the Ultegra, a superb bike, but no front suspension dampening. I’ve demo’d the Spech Roubaix also, and these bikes are quite different in their handling, IMO Mostly due to frame dimensions.

The Spech has a ton of stack ( I ride 58 cm at 5-10 ) and is a bit.more jittery at higher speeds on windy roads. So, I’m buying another Domane, the SLR 9 with Dura Ace as a P1 (mostly paint). I may also get the Spech S Works, same components, but I really need to ride the 56 and 58 again.

I’m older (62), so no racing, just like nice bikes!!

Did you ever wrote the comparison articles as I cannot find them

Hmm, I did…. but then I haven’t quite finished and posted them. You’re prompt is a helpful kick up the bum. I’ll get them published. loveyoubyeeee

Hi there, i hope you can help me out.

Im looking for a road bike. i am 5’8″ and 130 lbs. What size is good for me? thanks so much

I have trek madone 2013 after specialized tarmac 2016 now i have giant tcr advance 2019 and its the best for qualité and price

I have a Trek Emonda SL6 disc, which I bought new a little over 2 years ago. After reading about how light the Emonda was, I went to the Trek store to ride one. They didn’t have any SLs, but one of the guys at the shop let me ride his personal SLR disc. On a quick spin, the bike felt amazingly responsive and quick. I figured how much difference could there be between the SL and SLR, so for probably 1/2 the price, I got the SL6 instead of the SLR6. HUGE MISTAKE! The two bikes are nothing alike. I’m super disappointed in the SL, which weighed 17.75 lb without pedals or bottle cages at delivery. Plus it came with 60 tpi tires that roll like square blocks. I replaced the tires with Conti GP5000s, so at least the bike is rideable, but I now ride my wife’s old Trek 5000 WSD instead. I average about 10,000 miles per year, but I probably have only about 5000 miles on the Emonda in the past two or three years. That’s what I get for trying to save a few bucks.

2012 Madone 4.5, great bike, fast very comfortable 2015 S-Works Tarmac, great bike, extremely fast

Leave a comment Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

• Lapierre X Lite 400 FDJ review
• Scott Addict R4 review
• Condor Bellissima review
• Santa Cruz Driver 8 review
• Titanium Hardtail Comparison – Five Ti Hardtails Put To The Test

Your cart is empty

The argument in favor of using filler text goes something like this: If you use arey real content in the Consulting Process anytime you reachtent.

Mountain Bikes

Parts & Components

Contact info.

Best Of The Best Xc Showdown // Cannondale Vs. Canyon Vs. Trek Vs. Specialized

• by Cyclesgo

Modern cross-country race steeds is lighter, faster and more advanced than we’ve ever seen before. The  mountain bike specs Action crew had the opportunity to put the top four XC race stallions to the test to discover which bike is most likely to help you earn your way to the top step of the podium.

THE CONTENDERS

Our shootout consisted of four top-of-the-line cross-country race bikes: sale mountain bike Specialized’s S-Works Epic, Canyon’s Lux CF 9.0 Team, Trek’s Supercaliber 9.9 and, last but not least, Cannondale Scalpel Hi-Mod Ultimate. Our list of bikes range in price from $7000 all the way up to $12,000. That’s right, we put the true superbikes to the test; however, keep in mind that many of these bikes are offered at a more entry-level price point for the weekend warrior who may not have a factory-backed budget. Weighing in at the heaviest of the class is the Canyon at 22 pounds. The lightest was the Epic weighing 21.25 pounds. Each bike in this shootout has its own pros and cons, so without further ado, let’s dive right into what these bikes are all about.

SPECIALIZED S-WORKS EPIC

The Epic is arguably the most well-known and highly regarded bike in its class due to its two-decade run and over 100 World Cup podiums to date. The Epic set the bar high and felt like the bike to beat going into our shootout. The latest updates to the Epic are a complete frame redesign, along with an updated Brain shock. Let’s dive into the tech and on-the-track feel for our S-Works contender.

Specialized best mountain bike shop near me went all out to make the S-Works Epic pop no matter how you slice it. Just take one look at its Candy Red paint job that flows down its RockShox SID fork legs for evidence of that. True tech guys and gals will fall in love with the clean and sleek appearance, thanks to SRAM’s AXS wireless drivetrain. In fact, the only two exposed “cables” at the front of the bike are the hydraulic brake hoses. The Epic offers the most futuristic look of all its competitors. It is the only bike to feature a power meter built into the crankset.

Specialized made the Epic more downhill-ready, with a slacker best 150mm travel mountain bike 67.5-degree head tube angle and a bottom bracket that sits 9mm lower than that of last year’s model. Additionally, the reach was increased across frame sizes to allow the use of shorter stems. A new Brain shock was placed lower behind the rear triangle, allowing the rear brake to be relocated. The new system offers more vertical flex in the chainstays to improve ride quality. Last but not least is a new pair of Control SL wheels that are 4mm wider and 90 grams lighter than last year’s. The wider profile offers improved impact strength by distributing the force over a larger area and gives the tire a wider stance for increased traction.

ON THE TRACK

SUSPENSION  100mm   front   100mm   rear TIRE SIZE  29″

The Epic, by far, was the most user-friendly bike in our shootout, thanks to its Brain suspension, which outsmarts the trails. While the rest of the bikes in our lineup came with remote lockouts, the mountain bike holidays Epic automatically stiffened up during out-of-the-saddle sprints and became supple when the trails got rough. The Epic’s new geometry was also highly favored by our test riders who experienced more confidence when hard-charging through challenging terrain. Specialized spec’d the Epic with the widest tires in its class at 2.3 inches, further improving the bike’s downhill prowess.

Of course, the Epic is designed to conquer climbs, just like all of its competitors. When the Epic is pointed uphill, it provides excellent pedaling efficiency with minimal movement. It’s not quite as locked-out feeling as the other bikes in this shootout; however, the time saved by not having to think about flipping a lockout switch and the added traction supplied by the slight suspension movement are points in its favor. As expected, best full suspension electric bike the Epic was the bike to beat in this shootout, and with its Ferrari-like appearance and performance, it’s hard to walk past this machine. See our full review here: https://mbaction.com/mountain-bike-action-bike-test-specialized-s-works-epic-xc-bike/

https://youtube.com/watch?v=MC_Sb4pgOSQ%3Fenablejsapi%3D1%26origin%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fmbaction.com

CANYON LUX CF 9.0 TEAM

Canyon best value hardtail mtb consumer-direct model allows the German company to offer exceptional price points, undercutting the most expensive bike in this shootout by $5000. With that savings, you could probably afford to own a competitive World Cup race bike, along with a quality road bike for the ultimate training package. The bike is armed to the teeth with high-tech components, a lightweight frame, carbon wheels and even a dropper post. The Lux is made to compete at the top level of our sport without demanding a top-dollar price.

The Lux mtb bike park features a carbon frame with internal cable routing, a Press-Fit bottom bracket and a steering lock. The bike features top-of-the-line Fox Factory suspension, along with a high-end Shimano XTR 12-speed drivetrain. The overall appearance of the bike is quite nice until you spot the vast array of cables at the front of the bike. With a remote lockout to the front and rear, a cable shifter, a dropper-post remote and, of course, two hydraulic brake lines, the Lux quickly becomes a mechanic’s worst nightmare. Compared to the Epic’s ultra-sleek look, the Lux may seem less appealing. That said, each one of the Canyon’s components operates really well and will benefit the rider on the trail.

Canyon best mtb trail bike was the only bike in our shootout with an XTR drivetrain; the other brands went with SRAM. Shimano’s XTR offers a crisper feel and an audible click that lets you know you have changed gears. The Fox suspension with remote lockout is also a nice touch, delivering both climbing and descending performance. The Lux has a secret weapon—a dropper post—a feature not seen on the rest of the bikes in this shootout. That said, the Lux needed a lowered saddle height the most. What’s the best mountain bike With a 70-degree head tube angle and 720mm handlebars, Canyon’s Lux was the twitchiest bike in our lineup. At slower speeds, the bike felt snappy and fun, allowing us to navigate the tightest trails with ease; however, when the trail got faster, the Lux started to get nervous. A skilled XC rider should be able to tame this beast and harness its speed, while a less confident descender will find the Lux requires laser focus if the rider wants to avoid being tossed over the bars. The Lux may have a slightly outdated geometry for today’s rougher XC courses, but its value makes it appealing to riders looking to save a few thousand bucks. See our full review here:  https://www.idmtb.com/

TREK SUPERCALIBER 9.9

Trek Supercaliber  is the most innovative bike in our shootout, combining the snappy performance of a hardtail with the supple control of a full-suspension bike. It truly blurs the lines between full suspension and hardtail and has a strong emphasis on straight-line speed. The heart of the Supercaliber is its IsoStrut shock. The bike uses an integrated shock that controls the flex in the rear end for minimal movement. An added bonus is the lack of pivots, making the bike lighter and simpler.

The best entry level women’s mountain bike Supercaliber is a race-ready bike made to be as light as possible, thanks to its innovative suspension design. Offering a claimed 60mm of travel with the combination of its shock stroke and rear-end flex, the Supercaliber has just enough squish to mellow out the trails. Trek constructed this bike using its OCLV carbon layup and used some of its own technologies, such as Knockblock, an integrated steering-lock system. Knockblock helps prevent the fork from smashing into the frame’s straight downtube. Trek also incorporated its Control Freak cable-routing system designed to allow any combination of controls on your bike. Should you want to add a dropper post or set up the brakes moto-style, Trek makes it easy.

Looking at the eletric mountain bike Supercaliber’s component package, you’ll see carbon parts, a high-end cable drivetrain and a 100mm Fox fork. Trek offers rider confidence with a slightly more relaxed geometry compared to the Lux; however, it’s not quite as slack as the Epic or Cannondale.

SUSPENSION  100mm   front   60mm  rear TIRE SIZE  29″

The Supercaliber is a full-speed-ahead race bike. Weighing in at slightly over 20 pounds without pedals, the Supercaliber is remarkably efficient at putting power to the ground. Aiding the pedaling efficiency is the geometry that places the rider over the front of the Supercaliber. The forward weight balance also enhanced how quickly the bike responded, both in and out of corners. The biggest advantage of the Supercaliber was no pedal bob during acceleration, yet the suspension proved capable of opening up and coming alive when the terrain got rough. Harsh hits, meanwhile, reminded us that the bike has less suspension than other bikes in its class. Many of our test riders said it was like riding a hardtail that magically soaks up the trails. It’s not designed for the more “sendy” XC rider. See our full review here:  https://cyclesgo.com/

CANNONDALE SCALPEL HI-MOD ULTIMATE

Demanding the highest price in our shootout, Cannondale’s Scalpel had a lot to live up to. Luckily, Cannondale had a few tricks up its sleeve to set this bike apart from its competitors. From high-tech carbon materials to hidden tools and top-of-the-line components, the Scalpel easily grabs any rider’s attention. And if that’s not enough to warrant a second look, Cannondale’s Lefty fork will sure do the trick.

Cannondale eletric mountain bike designed the Scalpel with Hi-Mod BallisTec carbon and a FlexPivot frame. The rear triangle uses a flat leaf-spring shape designed to increase compliance over rough terrain. The Scalpel has an integrated stash kit that places a multi-tool, tire plug and CO2 under the rider’s water-bottle cage. This handy feature was used quite often by our testers. There’s no shortage of technology on the Scalpel, including a Garmin wheel sensor that pairs with your smartphone and gives you information, such as speed, route, distance and more. A feature mechanics will love is the tube-in-tube cable-routing system that makes routing internal cables as easy as can be.

SUSPENSION  100mm   front   100mm  rear TIRE SIZE  29″

Our test mountain bike trails app crew quickly fell in love with the Cannondale’s confident handling and climbing performance. The bike has a plush ride that makes it great for marathon-style races, but it is also efficient enough to power its way up singletrack. The Lefty fork may look strange to new Cannondale riders; however, remember that a 747 aircraft has landing gear closely resembling the single-leg fork design. On the trail, the fork provides excellent handling, diving in and out of corners with ease. Although the Scalpel is the most expensive bike in the lineup, its technology, component spec and innovation justify the price. Any rider looking for a well-rounded cross-country machine that’s fast yet comfortable will gravitate towards the Scalpel. See our full review here:  https://cyclesgo.com/

THE FINAL SHOWDOWN BETWEEN THE CANNONDALE VS. CANYON VS. TREK VS. SPECIALIZED

When it’s time to line up at the starting gate, mountain bike all mountain which bike would our test riders choose? Well, we hate to say it, but it was a toss-up. While all four bikes are easily capable of winning a race, two stood out. That said, the other two had great qualities that deserve to be mentioned. Starting with the Canyon Lux, we couldn’t get past its insanely good value. A full XTR spec and Fox Factory suspension on a carbon frame topped off with a dropper post for right around $7000 is a great deal. This bike is truly race-ready and put up a great fight in our shootout. Unfortunately, its overly steep head tube was its main drawback, and that’s something changing out parts simply won’t fix. That said, the Lux is a great bike for any budget racer looking for the full-factory treatment.

Moving on to the Trek Supercaliber mountain. bike we found the bike to be a solid choice for short-track racers wanting to lay down the power with hardtail-like efficiency. The drawback to the Supercaliber is that its limited suspension is harsh on bigger hits. If your racetracks are smooth and flowy, you’ll find the Trek to be a great weapon, but rough terrain will quickly wear you out.

The mountain bike shops near me Epic and Scalpel tied for first place. Both bikes feature top-of-the-line components and showcase the latest innovations in mountain bike technology. Both bikes would be ideal options when a rider needs the most comfort possible to take on a 40-plus-mile race. Each of these bikes shines in different areas, from the Epic’s limited controls that allow its rider to better focus on the race to the Scalpel’s confident handling and plush suspension feel when the trail gets rowdy. As for overall appearance, we have to give the edge to the Candy Red machine, while Cannondale’s clever tool holder and eye-catching Lefty fork earned points in its favor. Ultimately, you can’t go wrong with any one of these superbikes. Each offers a unique ride quality best suited for different parts of the race.

An XC rider where can i buy a mountain bike should find the bike that best complements the area where his or her skills are lacking. If you need optimal climbing performance, go with Trek’s near-hardtail efficiency. If you are on a tight budget, pick Canyon’s Lux, which offers everything you need and more. Want a bike that seems like it came from the future? Specialized’s Epic is right for you. And, if you are hunting for the perfect long-distance race bike, the Cannondale Scalpel is second to none. If you have yet to see our video shootout on these bikes, head over to  Mountain Bike Action ’s YouTube channel and see our testers battle side by side.

Share This Post:

Wrecking crew tested: salsa cycles blackthorn mountain bike, mba wrecking crew tested: marin alpine trail carbon 2, related post.

Long-term review | Max’s Vitus Sommet 297 AMP

Iron Horse Yakuza Ojiki – first ride review

Kona Hei Hei Supreme review

Giant Reign E+ 1 review

Gary Fisher Wahoo review

Cotic RocketMAX Gold Eagle GX review