trek vs alubike

Trek bikes range: which model is right for you?

• Sign up to our newsletter Newsletter

The humble beginning of Trek bicycles took place in the "red barn" - once a carpet warehouse - in Waterloo, USA. The first bikes were steel touring frames , but within three years the brand had expanded substantially.

Eventually outgrowing the barn, Trek moved into a much larger headquarters - still in Waterloo - in the year 1980. From there it began to manufacture road racing bikes, then in 1983 created its first mountain bike before moving into accessories come 1984.

Having started out in steel, Trek moved into developing aluminium bikes in 1985. The first Trek branded full carbon frame came in 1989 - the Trek 5000 had a frame weight of 1.5kg. It was built by an outside manufacturer and discontinued after a year. Trek made its own efforts at carbon, with an in-house production, in 1992 to much greater success.

>>> Trek mountain bikes: which model is right for you?

Now, Trek offers the Madone (aero bike), Domane (endurance bike), Emonda (lightweight race bike) and Checkpoint (gravel bike) as well as the Boone cyclocross and Speed Concept time trial machine.

Trek's OCLV Carbon

You can trust Cycling Weekly. Our team of experts put in hard miles testing cycling tech and will always share honest, unbiased advice to help you choose. Find out more about how we test.

Trek's carbon bikes have always used their own patented 'OCLV carbon' - this stands for Optimum Compaction Low Void. It believes this carbon creates the best compromise between low weight and high strength and stiffness.

Optimum Compaction refers to the way sheets of carbon are layered into the mould, and optimised via heat and pressure - in Trek's opinion the two treatments are administered to the perfect ratio. Low Void refers to the minimisation of space between the layers of carbon, which might otherwise reduce strength and durability.

In 1995, Trek opened an independent facility inWhitewater, Wisconsin. The idea being that the Waterloo factory would work in frame development only. For those who want to customise their ride, the'Project One' custom paint programme arrived in 2001.

Trek's pro cycling support

Trek supported now disgraced American cyclist, Lance Armstrong, through his peak years. In 1997, it helped him sign with their sponsored team, US Postal Service Pro Cycling. He won his seven editions of the Tour de Frances on bikes bearing the brand name, but all of said wins were later taken from him following doping violations.

In 2014, the brand sponsored the Trek Factory Racing Team, now calledTrek–Segafredo. In that role, it provided bikes for high profile winners such as Fabian Cancellara and Alberto Contador,as well as Jens Voigt, and notably his Hour Record in September 2014.

In 2020, Trek continued to support the Trek-Segafredo men's and women's race outfits, two highly successful teams.

Trek's acquisitions

Over the years, Trek has made a number of high profile acquisitions. The most famous, perhaps, Gary Fisher bicycles - the mountain bike brand which it took over in 1993.

Later came Bontrager Cycles in 1995 and Electra Bicycle Company in 2014. Bontrager, now Trek's component and apparel brand, maintains the same name as does Electra, the creator of leisure bikes and accessories.

Useful links for road bike shoppers…

Trek's road bike models

Trek is able to offer a wide range of different bikes, each tuned to a slightly different purpose. Some model families are available in a selection of standards (SLR premium carbon, SL carbon, ALR premium aluminium and AL aluminium), and then these come with assorted levels of componentry to suit your price bracket.

To add even more depth to the range, Trek offers many models in two different 'fits'. The Madone and Émonda come as standard in an H2 (traditional) fit, but there are versions in what it calls 'H1' fit. This is more aggressive, shaving off about 30mm on the head tube to create a longer, lower ride. The Domane comes in an H2 'Endurance' fit, with a few models in 'Pro Endurance', again with a longer and lower stance on offer.

Here's a look at the key model families...

With each product is a ‘Buy Now’ or ‘Best Deal’ link. If you click on this then we may receive a small amount of money from the retailer when you purchase the item. This doesn’t affect the amount you pay.

Trek Domane

Our expert review:

Reasons to buy

Reasons to avoid.

The Trek Domane was introduced in 2012. It was created to offer a comfortable ride, the key feature being an IsoSpeed decoupler which separated the seat tube from the top tube, thus reducing vibrations and fatigue.

In 2016 it gained theFront IsoSpeed, which helps to reduce vibrations at the front end without impacting handling. This came alongside a new slider, which alters the level of dampening offered by the rear.

In its most recent update , the Domane took notes from the Madone with an aero fork profile, whilst becoming more versatile thanks to clearance for 38mm tyres (without mudguards, 35mm with). It also gained a downtube compartment for stashing tools (or snacks!).

Though comfort is important to the Trek Domane, it's still a racing frame, and its prowess has been demonstrated by UCI WorldTour riders at major one-day Classics, such as Strade Bianche and the Tour of Flanders. The top Domane bikes come with an H1.5 fit, which was developed with the Trek-Segafredo teams to offer the optimal balance between aerodynamics and endurance.

The Trek Domane - available as a men's build or with women's specific componentry - is a fast selling model, which comes in a range of frame materials.

The Domane SLR uses the lightest carbon Trek offers, the SL is one step down, whilst the AL uses aluminium and is the cheapest of the range.

Trek Madone

The Trek Madone is quite another beast, and the bikes come built for men and women; the latter's models with women's saddles and narrower handlebars . With an aggressive geometry and stiffness to boot, it's a road race hero, and aerodynamics have become part of its lifeblood. When we tested five aero bikes , head to head, the Trek Madone came out fastest.

Modern Trek Madone's feature a high level of integration, with the cables tucked away yet reachable via an access point at the top of the down tube.Wind tunnel testing has helped Trek to create theirKVF (Kammtail Virtual Foil) tube shapes, used on the frame and fork. These unconventional tube shapes are designed to further reduce drag, helping the rider/bike unit to slice through the air efficiently.

Because being bumped around doesn't make you faster, the Madone also features an IsoSpeed decoupler at the seat tube and more recently an adjustable one at the head tube, which offers greater compliance whilst still being integrated to prevent adding drag.

The newest model, according to Trek, can offer 17 per cent more compliance through to 21 per cent more stiffness, depending upon your chosen setting. A damper at the seatpost is also said to cut rebound by 13 per cent. All of these stats add up to a bike that can be comfortable and stiff at the same time - and one that earned a place in our 2018 Editor's Choice awards.

The majority of the bikes come in a more relaxed 'H2' geometry, save for the Madone SLR, which is in an 'H1.5' fit - this is designed to allow riders to achieve an H1 fit or an H2, depending upon their set up.

Trek Émonda

Adding more depth to the Trek family is the Trek Émonda, launched in 2014. Designed to be a climbing bike, newer adaptations are capable of negotiating mixed terrains - with disc brakes available and tyre clearance to 28mm.

>>> Trek Émonda range explained

Trek continues to work on developing the Émonda, dropping the weight of the top end Trek Émonda SLR to 640g in a size 56cm (665g with discs) and 1091g for the Trek Émonda SL (1149g with discs). The weight difference is largely achieved by the use of700 Series OCLV carbon on the SLR, as opposed to 500 series on the SL.

The aluminium model has seen some major work and the result earned it a place in the Editor's Choice 2019 awards. The key characteristic we loved was the way it simply didn't look, or ride, like aluminium. A lot of this is down to Trek's 'Invisible Weld Technology' which increases the surface area of the frame, adding to strength and reducing weight. The ALR model's frame weight comes in at a competitive 1112g, or 1131g with discs, and it uses the brand's 300 Series Alpha Aluminium.

The carbon models are available in 'SLR' build or 'SL', the former being the lightest and the latter more affordable. The majority of Trek Émonda bikes cone in an 'H2' fit, but they can be purchased in an 'H1' geometry, if you choose the top end 'Race Shop' version.

There are a few nods to neatness and integration around, such as the use of 'Blendr Integration' which seamlessly mounts Bontrager’s cycling computer, Ionbike lights or even Garmin computers directly to the handlebars. On SLR versions there's ‘Control Freak Cable Management’ which allows for shifter and brake cables to be housed through the frame.

Trek Checkpoint

With gravel and adventure bikes a fast growing category, the Checkpoint is Trek's offering to fill that sector. The crucial element here is that both the SL and ALR frame options come fitted out with 35c gravel tyres, and can accommodate rubber up to 45c. They've all got internal cable routing, to ensure much stays out, whilst the higher end models use 'Control Freak' routing which is neater.

>>> Best gravel bikes: the top models reviewed

If you opt for the carbon SL model, you get vibration dampening from an IsoSpeed decoupler at the rear, too.  To provide stability and confidence on light trails as well as comfort on all-day adventures, the geometry is not as aggressive as the road bikes elsewhere in the range. Such all-day rides warrant plenty of kit, so there's mounts for racks and mounts. Similar to elsewhere in the range, there's AL, ALR and SL models.

Trek Speed Concept

Trek's Speed Concept time trial bike has been raced by the pros yet is still seen on the amateur race scene as a popular option.

>>> Check out Fabian Cancellara's 2016 Speed Concept

The frames use 500 Series OCLV Carbon, boasting the KVF (Kammtail Virtual Foil) tube shapes described in the Madone, plus a carbon fork with integrated brake and stem - the key goal being cutting through the air quickly.There's space to fit Trek's SC Draft Box and SC Sped Box, largely used by triathletes carrying snacks.

Trek Boone 5

Trek's got plenty of experience in the muddy realm of off-road cycling - and they've got a selection of cyclocross bikes. The Trek Boone 7 model comes with hydraulic disc brakes, a one-by crank and 12-speed cassette and they've all got Bontrager's own 33c cyclocross tyres.

The frame material is Trek's 600 series OCLV carbon, and there's front and rear IsoSpeed decouplers to help riders negotiate the mud without excess transfer of vibration. Combining the mud ready tyres, disc brakes, 'cross focused cable routing and geo into an aluminium package is the Trek Crockett family.

They key differentiation is the frame material, which is300 Series Alpha Aluminium, and there's no decoupler. However, it's still a performance bike that's ready to race.

Thank you for reading 20 articles this month* Join now for unlimited access

Enjoy your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1

*Read 5 free articles per month without a subscription

Join now for unlimited access

Try first month for just £1 / $1 / €1

Get The Leadout Newsletter

The latest race content, interviews, features, reviews and expert buying guides, direct to your inbox!

Michelle Arthurs-Brennan the Editor of Cycling Weekly website. An NCTJ qualified traditional journalist by trade, Michelle began her career working for local newspapers. She's worked within the cycling industry since 2012, and joined the Cycling Weekly team in 2017, having previously been Editor at Total Women's Cycling. Prior to welcoming her daughter in 2022, Michelle raced on the road, track, and in time trials, and still rides as much as she can - albeit a fair proportion indoors, for now.

Oli Peace is stepping up in his first pro race at the Tour of the Alps

By Tom Davidson Published 18 April 24

The Ribble Rebellion team is riding an eye-catching bike for 2024, in more ways than one

By Joe Baker Published 18 April 24

Useful links

• Tour de France
• Giro d'Italia
• Vuelta a España

Buyer's Guides

• Best road bikes
• Best gravel bikes
• Best smart turbo trainers
• Best cycling computers
• Editor's Choice
• Bike Reviews
• Component Reviews
• Clothing Reviews
• Contact Future's experts
• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Cookies policy
• Advertise with us

Cycling Weekly is part of Future plc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site . © Future Publishing Limited Quay House, The Ambury, Bath BA1 1UA. All rights reserved. England and Wales company registration number 2008885.

• Gear Guides
• Everyday Carry
• Buying Guides

The 10 Best Aluminum Road Bikes

There’s a great debate among cyclist about the different materials used to construct a great bicycle frame. Many people opt for the new carbon fiber, seeing steel as outdated and aluminum as cheap. This is a misconception though, because aluminum road bikes can definitely hold up to match even some of the best carbon fiber frames.

Aluminum vs. Other Materials: How It Holds Up

You may hear sources boast about carbon, titanium, or steel road bikes as superior, but don’t be fooled, aluminum road bikes have their perks as well. When considering the best material for your bike frame, consider these facts about aluminum:

• Aluminum is a lightweight material that creates a bike that is easy to handle and maneuver.
• Aluminum is not costly to produce, which means aluminum road bikes are incredibly affordable when compared to many other styles.
• The aluminum frame will hold up to corrosion, so your bike will resist rust and damage due to chemical exposure for years.
• Technology has advanced since the first aluminum bikes were created. The aluminum tubes that create the bikes frame can be shaped to be more aerodynamic than a standard aluminum frame.

Because modern technology has allowed the advance of crafted metal, including aluminum, these bikes can now be single, double, or even triple butter for durability and geometrically sculpted for speed and comfort, meaning they can easily hold up to the carbon frame standard. Aluminum isn’t a bad choice, and you may save a dollar or two without having to compromise everything you need and love in your road bike.

Aluminum is lightweight, can be sculpted for durability, and is usually less costly than other materials. If you’re looking for a great aluminum road bike this year, here are ten to consider:

Allez DSW Sprint X1 Expert

This aluminum masterpiece is built for speed, and is easily one of the most popular aluminum road bikes on the market. It was designed using Allez D’Aluisio Smartweld Sprint Technology, which increases the frames rigidness and durability for a smoother ride. This modern technology focuses on adjusting weld locations to create the stiffest frame possible, giving you durability where you need it most. While the frame is built with expertly crafted aluminum, the fork is crafted from carbon fiber for extra front end support and stability. This 11-speed is built to be fast comfortable, which is why it’s such a common first pick.

B’Twin Ultra 520 AF GF

If a long, steady trek is more your style, you need a bike built for endurance, and the B’Twin Ultra 520 AF GF is it. The bike is geometrically designed to provide comfort and support during rides. The FIZIK Antares R3 Endurance saddle is wider than most bike seats, making this one of the most comfortable bikes you’ll ever ride. The frame is built with a varying thickness in order to increase weight accordingly, allowing you to pick the size that’s best for you. Hydraulic Disc brakes let you stop on a dime, so this bike is great for racing or long afternoon rides.

This bike is built with 100 series Alpha Aluminum, which is expertly shaped and crafted to provide plenty of durability without adding too much weight. The bike weighs in at just under 22 pounds, so it is easy to maneuver, but also stable to ride, even for racing. The bike includes rack mounts and is compatible with mud-guards for off-road adventures, too. Blendr Technology allows you to clip all you accessories right to the stern and provides a streamlines, clean aesthetic that isn’t too bulky, even after you load it down with all your gear. This 8-speed is the perfect medium for those with a love for speed and an adventurous spirit.

Kinesis UK Aithein EVO (Frame and Fork)

So this isn’t exactly a completed bicycle, but sometimes a durable, well-built frame is the best place to start. Starting with a frame means that you can customize the rest of the bike to your liking, whether you like to race or go off-roading, or just simply use your bike to get a little exercise. This aluminum frame is a great option. The frame features a downtube for internal cable routing as well as a tapered headtube that allows clearance for tires up to 30mm. The frame is available in five different sizes and two colors, including Anodized Black and Metallic Candy Red.

Canyon Endurace AL Disc 7.0

The Canyon Endurace AL Disc 7.0 is lightweight and comfortable, hosting a sports-style aluminum frame and wheels that are compatible with wider or tubeless tires, which give you some freedom to build your bike the way you choose. The Selle Italia X3 Canyon Edition seat features a leaf spring technology that lets the seat move with you, even if you decide to take your bike off-roading. This 11-speed offers the technology of the Shimano 105 design and hydraulic disc brakes, which offers smooth shifting and lightweight rotation, as well as excellent stopping power. When paired with the durable frame and spring-loaded seat, this bike is exactly where control meets comfort.

Trek Emonda ALR 6

The Trek Emonda ALR 6 is another aluminum option for a quality racing bike. The aluminum frame is modeled after other Emonda carbon fiber frames and features a geometric design that makes the bike more aerodynamic and comfortable, even during long rides. The lightweight bike is incredibly responsive and great for those who like to cut corners to get ahead of the game. The bike is built to absorb road friction to provide a smooth ride. It is also a stylish option, and features an Invisible Weld Technology for a seamless, polished look. It features Trek’s patented Blendr technology as well, so all your gear and accessories will attach with ease.

Cannondale CAAD12 Disc 105

This bike frame features a unique geometry, patented and only available through Cannondale, crafted from flattened disc mounts, seatstays, and chainstays that help absorb shock for a smoother ride. The Shimano Hydraulic Disc Brakes are top of the line and give you ultimate stopping power. Built from 6069 aluminum which is flared in all the right places, you can expect this bike to hold up to anything you put it through. This 11-speed is lightweight and easy to maneuver, and its great for trekking on and off the road.

Fuji Roubaix 1.5

The Fuji Roubaix 1.5 is built to be a race bike. Because the materials are reduced in low-stress areas, the frame itself only weighs around 1090g, making it one of the lightest frames on the market. No worries, though, because the super-butted 6066 aluminum frame is also built to last, meaning you can reach great speeds without sacrificing stability and durability. It’s lightweight build makes this bike incredibly responsive and the carbon fork will hold up to any pressure. This 10-speed bike comes in Satin Storm Silver with yellow accents and 7 different sizes.

This bike has it all– a lightweight frame that is ultra responsive, disc brakes that are reliable and strong, mudguard mounts for off-road riding, a heavy-duty carbon fork, and pannier carrying capabilities. This bike has clearance for tires up to 35mm and is great for those who want enough comfortability to ride every day as well as the durability they need to take their bike anywhere they go. This bike comes in four different sizes and a range of colors.

Cube Attain SL Disc

This bike features a double butted aluminum frame with smooth welds for a classic, stylish look that is also lightweight and durable. Road Comfort Geometry absorbs shock and provides a smooth ride. The hydraulic disc brakes are both reliable and predictable, giving you the stopping power you need exactly when you need it. The compact race style handlebars are great for maneuvering your bike at great speeds, and the Cube RP 1.0 seat is wide and cushioned to keep you comfortable while you do it. This 11-speed comes in a classic black and red design and six different speeds.

• off.road.cc
• Dealclincher
• Fantasy Cycling

Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

• Sportive and endurance bikes
• Gravel and adventure bikes
• Urban and hybrid bikes
• Touring bikes
• Cyclocross bikes
• Electric bikes
• Folding bikes
• Fixed & singlespeed bikes
• Children's bikes
• Time trial bikes
• Accessories - misc
• Computer mounts
• Bike bags & cases
• Bottle cages
• Child seats
• Lights - front
• Lights - rear
• Lights - sets
• Pumps & CO2 inflators
• Puncture kits
• Reflectives
• Smart watches
• Stands and racks
• Arm & leg warmers
• Base layers
• Gloves - full finger
• Gloves - mitts
• Jerseys - casual
• Jerseys - long sleeve
• Jerseys - short sleeve
• Shorts & 3/4s
• Tights & longs
• Bar tape & grips
• Bottom brackets
• Brake & gear cables
• Brake & STI levers
• Brake pads & spares
• Cassettes & freewheels
• Chainsets & chainrings
• Derailleurs - front
• Derailleurs - rear
• Gear levers & shifters
• Handlebars & extensions
• Inner tubes
• Quick releases & skewers
• Energy & recovery bars
• Energy & recovery drinks
• Energy & recovery gels
• Heart rate monitors
• Hydration products
• Hydration systems
• Indoor trainers
• Power measurement
• Skincare & embrocation
• Training - misc
• Cleaning products
• Lubrication
• Tools - multitools
• Tools - Portable
• Tools - workshop
• Books, Maps & DVDs
• Camping and outdoor equipment
• Gifts & misc

Specialized Allez Sprint vs Trek Emonda ALR — which aluminium race bike will win this epic showdown?

First Published Apr 22, 2023

A few years ago, it looked like alloy bikes were all but dead; however, in 2023 they still represent a very real and very competitive alternative to carbon.

With Trek’s latest aluminium road bike  release a few weeks ago, the third generation Emonda ALR, two of the biggest brands in cycling, Trek and Specialized, now have bang-up-to-date performance aluminium bikes . But which is best? Here's a closer look at the weights, specs and geometry to help you decide which is best for you... 

Alloy bikes are back!

There was a point in time, roughly five years ago, when carbon performance machines were getting cheaper and cheaper. Having an aluminium bike often meant sacrificing either aerodynamics, weight, comfort, tyre clearance or in some cases a combination of all of the above!

> Opinion: "Aluminium frames are the work of the devil"

However, in the last few years, we’ve since seen a resurgence of bikes made of metal and not just at the lower end of brand's ranges. I was so impressed with the recent development in alloy tech that when purchasing a bike for racing, training and filming on, I opted for this Specialized Allez Sprint.

> Staff Bikes: Jamie's custom Specialized Allez Sprint Disc

Trek, eager to not be left behind, has brought its Emonda ALR bang up to date with this third generation featuring Kammtail aero tubing and fully integrated cables.

Trek claims that it’s “affordable, ultra-lightweight and faster than ever”, but is it good enough to beat the Allez Sprint? Let’s find out if I should have waited before spending my hard-earned cash on an alloy superbike...

A closer look at the frames

> Best road bikes 2023 — find your perfect drop bar bike whatever your budget

Call me vain, but a big part of any of my bike purchasing decisions comes down to looks. I personally think it’s important to like what you’re riding. After all, morale will make a far bigger difference to your riding ability than most other marginal gains!

The Allez’ looks are perhaps not its strong point... just look at these welds! Specialized claims that “smartwelding” its hydroformed tubes together is both stronger and results in a lighter bike (more on that further down the page). 

> Your complete guide to bike frame materials — Should you choose carbon, steel, aluminium, titanium?

Trek, meanwhile, uses its “invisible” weld technology, Okay, ‘invisible’ might be pushing it, but the welds are certainly inconspicuous at first glance.

The welds at the bottom of the seat stays are noticeable if you go looking, but the head tube and seat tube junctions do look almost like carbon, which I guess is the impression that Trek is shooting for.

Integrated cables

Like them or loath them, both of the bikes now fully integrate their cables; however, from the factory both use very similar designs where the brake hoses and gear cables (if required) run under the stem, and then into the frame via holes in the headset bearing cover at the top of the head tube (as shown on the Emonda above).

They then pass through the upper headset bearing and then down the downtube to the mechs and rear brake.

This has both pros and cons. Both manufacturers claim an aero advantage, although neither specifies how much. We’d suggest in the region of 2-3 watts at 40kph, i.e. negligible for most riders. It does arguably look neater though…

Obviously, the negatives of such a design are going to be set up and serviceability. If your headset bearings need replacing, then that’s a few hours of yours or your mechanic's life that can't be got back! And the trickier routing will drive many riders to a bike shop.

If you’re looking for a bike that forgoes the additional hassle of integrated lines, then neither of these bikes is for you. I’d suggest keeping your eye out for a previous generation of either.

Tube shapes

As previously mentioned, Trek has moved away from its more traditional tube shapes and gone for Kammtail tubing, where the trailing edge of the tube is squared off. This should be more aerodynamic than the previous generation Emonda, but without a wind tunnel, we're unable to validate this claim. Which do you think is the prettier bike though? Let us know in the comments section below as always. 

The Allez also utilizes Kammtail tube profiles, perhaps to an even greater degree as the seat tube and seatpost are not round either. This means that on the Allez, you do have to use the proprietary seatpost which happens to be the same as on the Tarmac SL7.

Colour options

When talking about colour schemes, it’s the Allez that rules the roost. In the UK the Allez is available in four new colours for the frameset in 2023 (shown above) and a further two colours for the full bike. Add on the eight from last year that you can, at the time of writing, still find in shops, and you have a huge variety from subtle to proper garish. 

Trek, meanwhile, offers the latest Emonda ALR in four colour schemes two for the ALR 6 (shown above), and a further two for the ALR 5 including the blue and orange that we have. Even I can do the maths on that one, it's just four colour schemes for now. It has to be said that the two black ones are pretty similar.

Trek has moved the ALR bikes from their H2 fit to H1.5. Back in the olden days, Trek gave you the option of an aggressive H1 fit or a more relaxed H2 fit on its performance-focused road bikes. This new H1.5 splits the difference really, and is what you’ll find on both Madones and carbon Émondas too.

Trek calls this “an optimised race-specific geometry [that] puts riders in the right position for power while minimising aero losses”.

It has to be said, the geometry of both bikes is very similar. Both are designed to be low-slung race bikes to help you cut through the wind and flick through turns in a criterium race.

> How to read a bike geometry table: the numbers made easy

In a size 54cm, you’ll find that the Specialized has a 1mm longer reach, a 4mm lower stack height, and a 2mm shorter wheelbase. If anything then, the Allez is probably the slightly more aggressive bike; but it really is marginal and we’re splitting hairs.

Both bikes also handle very similarly. They have exactly the same headtube angle, which means the steering is all but identical, and just 0.3 degrees difference in seat tube angle means that you get the same level of twitchiness/high-speed stability out of both.

The bottom bracket drop is also very similar on both bikes (that’s the distance between the bottom bracket and an imaginary straight line between the wheel axles). This is often the difference between feeling that you’re sat on the bike or 'in' the bike. It’s 70mm on the Trek and 72mm on the Spesh, making you feel slightly more 'inside' the Allez, but again it's marginal.

If you haven’t gathered by now, the bikes are vastly similar in geometry, and the minor differences that there are can be easily counteracted with different bar, stem and saddle positions. Arguably the biggest difference that I’ve found is the standover height. It’s a whopping 21mm more on the Allez.

This does mean that for the same saddle height, you’ll get more exposed seatpost on the Emonda, which means there’s more space for it to flex. That results in good rear-end comfort, especially with a carbon post. 

So, to summarise, you can’t make a decision about which one is best for you based on geometry; but you should be aware that both are pretty aggressive and have the fast handling characteristics nailed. If you’re looking for something more relaxed, cruisy and arguably more comfortable, then you should look at something like a sportive or endurance bike . 

> 8 cheap ways to get a lighter bike — save a kilo or more

Let’s see if we can split the two bikes apart a bit more on the scales. Both claim to have a focus on weight, but this is still an area where you will get a performance advantage from carbon. That said, the bike industry is becoming more and more aware that weight isn’t all it’s cracked up to be unless you’re climbing mountains on the regular.

The framesets are easiest to compare. It's 1,257g for the Trek and then 406g for the fork. This is the painted weight. 

The Allez, meanwhile, has a slightly heavier 440g fork, but we weighed our 54cm frame at 1,198g (painted) so slightly lighter. That gives the Spesh a total weight of 1,638g and the Trek is 1,663g. It looks like we’re not splitting them here either. 

Tyre clearance and bottom brackets

One area that you will find a difference is with tyre clearance. The new Emonda has a claimed maximum tyre size of 28c, which is actually quite small compared to many recent bikes. The Allez, meanwhile, has a claimed 32mm clearance, so if you’re looking to ride around on larger rubber then there’s a clear winner in this regard.

Does this make a world of difference? Well for many riders, it won’t make the slightest bit of difference. You can still use many of the latest super-wide wheelsets, and most racers I know won’t touch anything wider than a 28mm tyre.

> How to choose the best width road tyres for your riding

For me though, this is a contributing factor. I now race on 28mm tyres, but during the winter I’ve been training on a set of 30mm wide tyres. I do have a sneaky suspicion that they would fit in the Trek, but it’s clear that the Allez is the more spacious of the two bikes.

Moving towards the bottom bracket area, and things once again get quite similar. Like on many of the recent bike releases, you’ll find a threaded bottom bracket on both. This is sure to stir up a conversation, but as far as comparisons go they’re pretty similar.

> Bottom brackets - get the insider info on your bike's beefiest bearing

Like all of the modern Trek bikes, the Emonda ALR gets a T47 threaded bottom bracket. Like many of the latest Specialized bikes, the Allez Sprint gets a threaded BSA. Is one better than the other> In my experience, no. They both do a very similar job: a bearing cup threads into each side of the frame, and each is compatible with just about every road crankset that you’d want to use, from Shimano Hollowtech to SRAM’s DUB spindles.

Oh and if you’re looking to purchase one of these as a winter race or training bike, then I’m afraid you might be disappointed. Neither has mudguard mounts. 

Prices and specifications

While all of the above features are very important, there’s obviously going to be one major factor determining most people's bike choice, and that is the price. 

So, framesets only first. The Allez comes in at £1,600 and that includes the seatpost, thru-axles and a few bits and bobs in the bag, but not as many as you might expect. You don't get grommets for fitting a Di2 electronic groupset, for example. 

The Trek, meanwhile, seriously undercuts that at £1,300; although you will need to factor in a seatpost, as unlike the Allez it doesn’t ship with one. Even so, a decent quality carbon seatpost to fit the standard 27.2mm frame will likely set you back in the region of £100, which still makes the Emonda £200 cheaper than the Allez. 

Trek says in its press release that "leaves riders with enough cash to spend on sweet new kits, race registrations and post-ride beers."

However, that’s not the end of the story. Most riders will of course want to purchase an entire bike rather than just a lump of metal. If that’s you, then you’ll be eager to hear that the new Emonda ALR comes in two build specs: the ALR 5 with a Shimano 105 R7000 11-speed mechanical groupset, Bontrager Paradigm SL wheels and a build weight of 8.8kg, and the ALR 6 that has Bontrager Paradigm Comp wheels, a Shimano 105 Di2 groupset and the same 8.8kg weight.

The ALR 5 build is now the lowest in the ALR range, because the ALR 4 has been ditched with this third generation. This means that complete bike builds start at £2,325 for the ALR 5, and the ALR 6 is £3,150. 

> Review: Specialized Allez Sprint 2022

Meanwhile, the one and only Allez complete build is very similar to the ALR 5. Once again, the 105 mechanical groupset makes an appearance, and we weighed our review bike at 8.74kg. It currently retails in the UK for £2,600 so once again a little more than the Trek.

Both of those builds are let down by the weighty wheels, and that’s why I’ve switched out the Allez wheels to the new Roval Alpinist SLX wheels. Look out for our alloy wheel super shootout including these very soon to find out the most cost-effective alloy wheel upgrades from the likes of Hunt, Scribe, Mavic and Fulcrum.

> 2022 Specialized Allez Sprint vs Tarmac SL7: which is best?

So which one would I have? Well, I’ve already got the Allez, and to be honest the Trek is so similar that there’s not a chance I’m going through the hassle of switching the frame out.

The latest Emonda ALR is, however, the first aluminium performance bike that I’ve ridden that can stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the Allez in terms of that get-up-and-go feeling.

Its geometry is excellent, as is the ride feel, so as long as you like one of the few colour schemes then the £300 lower price tag makes it a serious consideration. I do think that Trek has missed a trick with the tyre clearance only being 28mm but one thing's for sure... alloy is back!

Look out for our full review of the Trek Emonda ALR5, coming soon. Let us know which one is your favourite in the comments section below...

Help us to fund our site

We’ve noticed you’re using an ad blocker. If you like road.cc, but you don’t like ads, please consider subscribing to the site to support us directly. As a subscriber you can read road.cc ad-free, from as little as £1.99. 

If you don’t want to subscribe, please turn your ad blocker off. The revenue from adverts helps to fund our site.

Help us to bring you the best cycling content

If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £1.99. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.

Jamie has been riding bikes since a tender age but really caught the bug for racing and reviewing whilst  studying towards a master's in Mechanical engineering  at Swansea University. Having graduated, he decided he really quite liked working with bikes and is now a full-time addition to the road.cc team. When not writing about tech news or working on the Youtube channel, you can still find him racing local crits trying to cling on to his cat 2 licence...and missing every break going...

Add new comment

14 comments.

Golly chucksneed got a hard time for having an opinion.

• Log in or register to post comments

People who post with the intent of being a WUM do. You don't actually think they believe anything they write?

Hirsute wrote: People who post with the intent of being a WUM do. You don't actually think they believe anything they write?

I don’t know what a WUM is. I also wouldn’t know I should believe anything anyone writes. The point I made was as I stated, rhetorical is what it is. 

Dhill wrote: I don’t know what a WUM is. 

WUM is internet shorthand for Wind Up Merchant.

The reaction to Chuck's EM needs to be seen in the context of the pattern of his comments, not just this one in isolation.

Generally I find his comments easy to ignore.

I'm all for aluminum and steel as it can be recycled whereas carbon will just end up as landfill.

themuffle wrote: I'm all for aluminum and steel as it can be recycled whereas carbon will just end up as landfill.

landfill? Most local authorities are incenerating waste now, and generating electricity in the process. 

Draw would work for me. Not fond of either brand. 

Yet both will be outdone by a similarly priced, or even cheaper, carbon bike. 'Premium' aluminium bikes are a scam for people who want to tell everyone that they could have spent less and gotten a better and lighter bike, but chose not to

Or...alternative view. It's offering more customer choice of high end frame materials because lightness isn't the be all and end all you seem to think it is.  By your silly trolling definition (see what I did there) Mason and Kenesis and others shouldn't exist. 

As an owner of several carbon bikes including an SL7 I'm well aware of its properties but my winter hacks, both MTB and road, are metal. It's so much more resilient to abuse in the dark, wet, muddy months. I'm really happy that brands are providing us with well specced, preformance metal offerings even though they don't provide the value they once did. 

ChuckSneed wrote: Yet both will be outdone by a similarly priced, or even cheaper, carbon bike. 'Premium' aluminium bikes are a scam for people who want to tell everyone that they could have spent less and gotten a better and lighter bike, but chose not to

Well if you knew anything about bikes (which I think many of us here have established - YOU DON'T) The Trek Emonda SL5 which has an almost identical build from groupset to wheels is only marginally lighter than the Alu Emonda on test. It is also a grand more expensive. So the Alu Emonda is a very attractive proposition to anyone looking at the pricepoint it comes in at. 

You can also get some absoloutly terrible carbon bikes. Carbon Fibre isnt some wonderful magical material. It has its limitations and that is where the skill of the designers come in. That is why a cheap chinese open mold frameset can cost a few hundred and a top end Colnago/S-Works/Cervelo/Pinarello etc etc will cost you 10 times more. 

You also can get a brilliant Aluminium frame. This also can be said of steel and titanium. Its just a material and used right can make bike better than a carbon fibre one. 

What about the latest  CAAD?

This is a comparison of Specialized Allez Sprint vs Trek Emonda ALR, assisted by the fact that the reviewer owns the Allez Sprint. To find a review of the CAAD13, type "site:road.cc caad13" into an internet search engine such as Google. 

Latest Comments

eradicating Hamas is a laudibale goal. Achieving this goal by killing or driving out every palestinian in Gaza, is either genocide or doomed to...

Fake news. It's only cyclists who ignore no entry.

Man flees after crashing into grade II listed Dorset home https://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/24263845.man-flees-crashing-grade...    

I did some extracts from a twitter thread and put it somewhere in drivers and their problems. Basically as you put but ended up with a star...

If plod can't get through their in their cars, then criminals will use it to evade them because heaven forbid the police should patrol on foot or...

The questions would be "who / what do the rules serve?  What are we willing to pay / accept to maintain or enforce them?"...

I once had an Explosif in Reynolds 853 with their Project 2 fork and it was one of the best mountain bikes I've ever owned.  I still think about it...

It sounds very much as if this is an argument about land rights and access, not about bikes or cars. It feels a bit like the Daily Fail whipping up...

Friday's effort 

Am I right in thinking that this has been the case in NL for over half a century (or 30 years nationally)?  With a brief interruption from 2003 -...

The best aluminium road bike you can buy – four bikes under € 2,500 in review

Carbon, carbon, carbon – According to manufacturers’ slogans and numerous Strava aces, the black magic fibre is one crucial ingredient in the recipe for victory. Especially in the lower-price range, aluminium road bikes are totally underestimated. That was reason enough for us to call for a test and compare the most popular aluminium racing bikes. Are the Aluminati real?

Aluminatus, the

Word class: noun, masculine Use: only used amongst experts Frequency: seldom to rare

Word division: Alu|mi|na|tus Pronunciation: Alumin a tus

Meaning: An Aluminatus is an enlightened road cyclist. He carries the message of the Aluminati all over the Globe and doesn’t buy into the carbon hype. He knows that aluminium is not equal to aluminium and carbon is not equal to carbon.

Origins: from the latin lumen (gen: luminis): the one coming from the light, the Enlightened, in this context “the light one”

“Aluminium road bikes are just for beginners.” We all came across this ugly generalisation at some point in our cycling life. Thanks to an attractive price/performance ratio, aluminium road bikes are an exciting opportunity for newbies to enter the world of performance race bikes. However, they are much more than just that; ambitious racers appreciate the sturdiness of aluminium rigs. An aluminium road bike is a reliable, bullet-fast workhorse. Both beginners and advanced riders will agree on one thing: price always plays a crucial role! Are cheap carbon bikes possibly your worst option ever?

Components are crucial for the overall performance of a bike. Can a bike with a Shimano 105 group stand up to one with swanky Ultegra Di2? Would it be wiser to spec aluminium frames with high-end components rather than sticking cheap components on carbon frames?

Current bike innovations prove it: most bikes presented in the run-up to the Tour de France were aerodynamically optimized — some of them were even considerably heavier than allowed by the UCI weight limit. The same rule applies for carbon and aluminium: when it comes to speed, weight plays a secondary role. Does the extra weight of our aluminium test bikes affect their performance?

What is important with aluminium road bikes?

The wind whistles, the chain rattles, and your heart pumps blood through your body — it’s the sweet symphony of speed. The world around you blurs away as you’re bombing it down the hill — you’re planning your escape to happiness. If you want to enjoy this feeling to the max, you’ll have to be able to forget about your bike for a moment. You’ll have to live in the here and now. That’s what really matters.

Handling: Even former pro David Millar said it in our 2018 race-bike comparison test: “A bike that doesn’t handle well just sucks.” Whilst on paper the geometries of different bikes might only vary marginally, the reality on the road is a totally different story. Does my bike stick to the road like a badass dragster? Can it playfully master the tightest of corners? When it comes to handling, we have to take into account many factors — personal preferences being the most important of them. After all, each of us has his or her very own riding style.

Safety: You just gave it your all to sprint to the top of the mountain stage, and now you want to attack the descent and clock the fastest lap. Ideally, the descent should allow you to save energy and recuperate strength. If a bike inspires confidence, it will also make you ride faster. You’ll feel confident enough to get into your best carving position and blast down the hill safely. If you feel safe on your bike, you’ll find the confidence to push your limits without panicking or anxiously hanging off the handlebars.

Comfort and Speed … No, our test crew is not asking for amphetamine — they’re just asking for cleverly generated speed. On one hand, it’s about how quickly your bike can get up to speed and how well it can maintain it. There are nimble bikes that accelerate incredibly well but can’t maintain that speed. On the other hand, you can’t forget about comfort and your riding position on your bike. If you feel comfortable in the saddle, you can keep a more aerodynamically-efficient position and do it for longer — this also allows you to generate more power and speed as a consequence. #needforspeed

Design and quality: If there’s “performance” written all over it there should be performance in it — but with a discreet design, please! In more aggressive price ranges, compromises are sometimes inevitable. How much useful integration does this bike feature? Has the frame been lovelessly stuck together or is the tubing connected smoothly? Is the internal cable routing causing a hell of a racket? And what about build quality? A cool bike should not only be aesthetically pleasant, but also motivate you to ride more.

Price/performance ratio: We often buy aluminium bikes for practical and rational reasons. That’s why the price/performance ratio plays a crucial role in our test. How much performance can a bike offer, and for what price? How much road bike are you really getting for your money? This test will answer all of your questions.

The test field

We didn’t try to map the complete spectrum of 2018 aluminium bikes in this test. We just wanted to compare the most popular and exciting aluminium road bikes of the year. That’s why our test field only includes the Specialized Allez Sprint Comp, the Cannondale CAAD12 105, the Trek Émonda ALR 6, and the ROSE XEON RS Ultegra Di2. We wanted to include the Canyon Ultimate AL, but unfortunately the German mail-order brand didn’t have a matching test bike available at the time. Is the sale success of Canyon’s alu-racer an indicator of the growing popularity of aluminium bikes?

Tops & Flops

Often small details can make a huge difference: seamless integration, first-class ergonomics and carefully selected parts. Easier said than done – here are some of the tops and flops from this grouptest.

Not everything was better in the good old days – aluminium bikes in 2018 are NOT what they were ten years ago. Alu-racers are genuine low-priced alternatives, and not just for riders with a small budget. Beautifully crafted bikes with clever details and superb performance at a fair price – we’re sure that some carbon bikes would succumb to their aluminium counterparts in a similar price range if they were tested in real conditions.

Yes to performance, but not at any cost – a top-notch racer doesn’t have to be expensive! Our GRAN FONDO comparison test proves that true performance doesn’t always have to drain your bank account — you can definitely snatch a KOM on your favourite aluminium rig. Yes, we noticed huge differences within our test field, but we also realised soon that the top alu-bikes in our test can confidently stand up to some significantly more expensive carbon racers. Our conclusions: if money is an issue, then an aluminium racer with high-end components is a much better option than a carbon rig with cheap components!

There’s aluminium and then there’s aluminium – and just like carbon, it leaves a lot of room for creativity. The earth isn’t flat and the tubing isn’t round: some of our test bikes feature complex tube shapes obtained via innovative manufacturing processes. A classic design awards the ROSE a discreet look and the filigree rear-end gives the frame a relatively high degree of compliance. On the other hand, we can almost hear the Specialized, with its Smartwelds, scream for stiffness. Our test shows us that even aluminium gives you the freedom to choose from very different concepts.

Top braking performance… but safety first – and even without disc brakes! In our test there isn’t a single bike with disc brakes. And why? Hydraulic disc brakes would significantly increase both the price and weight. On top of that, cheaper disc brakes are not as good as high-end models and they’re also much heavier. Our test rides highlighted massive differences in braking performance. Shimano’s 105 and Ultegra brakes on the Cannondale and Trek performed very well, while the brakes on the ROSE didn’t seem to harmonise with the brake-track of the RS-1400 wheels. The Tektro brakes on the Specialized didn’t convince us either.

race-bike doesn’t always have to feel uncomfortable. ROSE and Trek are making a clear statement with their bikes: if you love the comfort of a carbon racer, you’ll only have one problem with our bikes — they are NOT made of carbon. Both manufacturers combine filigree seat stays with carbon seatposts and deliver an overall concept that can take on any challenge from amateur races to sporty tours on rough roads.

Comparison tests are unfair – especially when the most expensive bike in the test costs € 900 more than the cheapest one. In a budget range of € 2,500 maximum, a difference of € 900 is huge. Luckily, we judged the bikes for their overall performance. The electronic groupset of the ROSE couldn’t make up for the fact that the Cannondale is just a better bike — and the shifting performance of Shimano’s 105 group isn’t actually much worse than Ultegra. On the other hand, this same comparison reveals that electronic shifting technology has made it into the price/performance segment. The Ultegra Di2 is a small Dura-Ace Di2 for thin wallets. That’s not fair, is it?

Conclusions

This comparison test proves that the Aluminati exists! As far as performance goes, modern alu-racers can actually stand up to high-class carbon rigs. Considering their price, aluminium road bikes with a better spec are often a wiser option than carbon bikes with cheap components. We were also excited to see how much high tech goes into aluminium bikes these days and how different the concepts of the big players are. With its uncompromisingly stiff frame, the Specialized Allez Sprint Comp impressed us with its superb stability in high-speed sections.

If you’re looking for an aluminium all-rounder, the Trek Émonda ALR 6 is a lot of bike for your money and brings a very comfortable riding position with it. If you’re planning to fly uphill relying on electronic shifting technology, ROSE lets you choose your own spec for the nimble XEON RS Ultegra Di2 — and without charging you a fortune. At the end of our test we were particularly impressed with the Cannondale CAAD12 105 and its price of just € 1,599! Outstanding handling, excellent looks, and a harmonious spec – jump on and ride off. You’re ready to race! The cheapest bike in our test field deserves our coveted Best in Test — the 2018 Aluminati boss!

All bikes in test: Specialized Allez Sprint Comp | Cannondale CAAD12 105 | Trek Émonda ALR 6 | ROSE XEON RS Ultegra Di2

This article is from GRAN FONDO issue #009

GRAN FONDO Cycling Magazine is published in a digital app format in both English and German. Download the app for iOS or Android to read all articles on your tablet or smartphone. 100% free!

Did you enjoy this article? If so, we would be stoked if you decide to support us with a monthly contribution. By becoming a supporter of GRAN FONDO, you will help secure a sustainable future for high-quality cycling journalism. Click here to learn more .

Words: Photos: Valentin Rühl

You may also like

Cold start – Getting a jump start on the season with an e-gravel bike and the...

FOCUS PARALANE 8.9 – Back to the roots yet up to date?

2024 GIANT Defy Advanced SL – More than just a pretty face?

Canyon Endurace CF SLX 8 AXS Aero – All in the name of speed and distance?

Specialized S-Works Roubaix SL8 – A gravel wolf in all-road clothing?

Endurance road bikes with an adventurous spirit – Shootout of four of the hottest...

• Subscribers
• EDITORS PICK // TOP TWO CYCLING LIGHTS FOR 2023
• TOP TWO CYCLING LIGHTS FOR 2023
• TECH TUESDAY: DEALINGS WITH SHIMANO DI2
• ALL ABOUT WIND TRAINERS AND INDOOR CYCLING
• WHAT YOUR PRESTA VALVE CAPS ARE ACTUALLY FOR
• BIKE TEST: ALLIED ECHO
• ALL ABOUT AIR & HOW-TO FIGHT FLAT TIRES
• PINARELLO F SERIES – WHAT TO KNOW ABOUT THE ALL-NEW RACE BIKES

CANNONDALE UNVEILS SLEEK 2023 ROAD LINE-UP

• THROWBACK THURSDAY, 2015: ALEX DOWSETT BREAKS THE HOUR RECORD

Bike Test: TWO-BY ALUMINUM Trek VS Cannondale

Trek’s Domane ALR 4 Disc versus Cannondale’s Optimo Disc

Photos: Pat Carrigan

Although aluminum is no longer the frame material of choice in the high-end market, it still provides an impressive value for entry-level bikes. Cannondale and Trek are two of the big brands that have continued to invest in their aluminum bike line, and what we have here are two entries that close in on the $2000 price point.

Cannondale pioneered the use of oversized aluminum tubes back in the early ’80s. In the many years since, Cannondale has maintained its reputation with aluminum fabrication with their popular CAAD line that’s used in a variety of different bikes. The CAAD Optimo is Cannondale’s newest take on what an aluminum bike should feel like while maintaining a friendly price tag.

The Trek Domane ALR 4 Disc is more than another aluminum frame with a flashy paint job. Trek utilized established compliance concepts from their higher-end carbon version to develop a bike that is budget-friendly and still packs a punch on the performance side.

The Optimo uses Cannondale’s own SmartForm C2 aluminum with internal cable routing, a PF30 bottom bracket and, of course, disc brakes. The rear triangle uses Cannondale’s SAVE stays that are used on all of their road bikes and even some of their mountain bikes. The SAVE micro-suspension flattens out parts of the chain and seatstays to dumb down rough sections of pavement.

Adding to the ride quality is a carbon fork up front and a small-diameter seat tube that hosts a 27.2mm seatpost. There are two bikes in the Optimo category; our test bike is the higher-end build retailing for $1460.

The ALR 4 stands unique with the addition of Trek’s proprietary IsoSpeed decoupler, which can be likened to a suspension system that provides unparalleled vertical compliance aimed at long days in the saddle. The IsoSpeed allows the seat tube to flex under stress to relieve some of the harsh vibrations and imperfections on the road.

Trek builds the Domane with their 200 Alpha aluminum with manipulated tube shapes to enhance the ride quality. The rear triangle has clearance for up to 32mm tires and uses a 12mm thru-axle. The frame has complete internal cable routing, an oversized BB86.5 bottom bracket shell and hidden fender mounts.

A nice, modern touch are the flat-mount front and rear disc brakes. Up front is a carbon fiber fork that uses a 12mm thru-axle and clearance for 32mm tires. The price tag is set at $1730.

Our test bike came with the proven 11-speed Shimano 105 drivetrain with an 11-28 cassette. Up front is an FSA Gossamer crankset with compact 50/34 chainrings. The shifters are paired with cable-actuated TRP Spyre brake calipers. The Optimo comes with Maddux wheels mounted with 25mm Schwalbe Lugano tires. Cannondale relied on their own C3 aluminum handlebars, stem and seatpost to round out the spec.

Bikes in this price point are generally value-driven, and the ALR 4 has plenty of bang-for-the-buck components. Trek spec’d the ALR with Shimano RS405 hydraulic brakes and calipers for consistent braking that is unaffected by the internal cable routing. The 10-speed Shimano Tiagra drivetrain is made up with a compact 50/34 crankset and 11-32 rear cassette, giving riders a broad range of gears. Our test bike came with 32mm tires and tubeless-ready Bontrager rims that we considered a bonus for this price point.

The geometry of the CAAD leans towards performance with a slightly aggressive reach and head angle but in a compact design. Our test riders felt comfortable with the 100mm stem, but were not impressed with the stock saddle and swapped it out for a Fabric Scoop after the first ride. On longer rides the fit felt comfortable and versatile enough for riders to find a good position for endurance adventures or more aggressive riding.

The CAAD rides like an aluminum bike with stiff, responsive qualities that are pronounced during hard efforts out of the saddle. Our test riders didn’t get any unwanted flex out of the frame when climbing or sprinting and were pleased with the overall responsiveness. When pedaling in the saddle, the CAAD had a smooth ride that was attributed to the SAVE stays. Over rough sections of pavement the CAAD delivered a surprisingly quiet ride.

It took us several hard braking efforts to burn the brakes in, but once we did, the calipers provided capable stopping power. The cable routing for the rear brake is awkward, coming out from under the chainstay, and drastically changed how the lever felt. Instead of a consistent pull, the line felt mushy and changed when we turned the handlebars.

Dialing in the fit, our test riders noticed the relax geometry and dropped the stem into the lowest stack height and were still comfortable enough during long rides. The Shimano brake hoods have a long reach, which felt strange to some riders. During our testing, though, we didn’t have any major complaints with the overall fit and geometry. To say to the Domane is a smooth-riding bike would be an understatement. The IsoSpeed decoupler muted rough sections of the road and delivered a very compliant ride quality.

Out of the saddle the frame was stiff and responded to our test riders’ efforts with ease. On long climbs we had plenty of gears to maintain a healthy cadence, even on steeper pitches of pavement. The Domane felt stable on descents, and the hydraulic calipers offered plenty of modulation. Some of our test riders would have preferred the smaller 140mm rotors opposed to the stock 160s, but overall were pleased with the braking performance.

THE VERDICT

Entry-level road bikes in this price category are usually a pretty solid bet in terms of durability and delivering a consistent ride. The CAAD Optimo delivers on ride quality and carries on the CAAD legacy well. Riders will have a solid platform to dial in this bike the way they want it down the road or simply enjoy it as is.

OPTIMO PUNCH LINES

• Comfortable ride
• Inconsistent rear brake

OPTIMO STATS

• Price: $1460
• Weight: 21.6 pounds
• Sizes: 44, 48, 51, 54 (tested), 56, 58, 60, 63cm

www.cannondale.com

There are plenty of aluminum bikes under $2000 with loud paint jobs and a quality component package, but few have frame designs that are as progressive as the Trek. The Domane ALR 4 Disc has a solid component spec and a frame design that has more technology than some high-end carbon bikes. The price tag on the Domane is near the top of what is considered budget-friendly, but the bike will require few—if any—upgrades to keep riders going.

DOMANE PUNCH LINES

• Proprietary Isospeed system
• Hydraulic disc brakes
• Comfortable geometry

DOMANE STATS

• Price: $1730
• Weight: 22 pounds
• Sizes: 50, 52, 54, 56 (tested), 58, 60, 62cm

www.trekbikes.com

THE COMPARO 

There are two schools of thought when shopping for your first bike—settling for the most affordable or opt for a slightly higher price to step up in technology. The Cannondale sits in a comfortable price range with a modern 11-speed drivetrain and mechanical-actuated disc brakes. For about $300 more, the Trek sits at the top of the entry-level price spectrum with a 10-speed drivetrain and hydraulic-actuated disc brakes.

It’s no secret that entry-level bikes are often the dumping ground for older, heavier components and technology as consumer expectations advance along with the new technology that finds itself on more expensive bikes. That argument could point to both the Cannondale’s cable pull brakes and Trek’s 10-speed drivetrain.

While everyone can always use extra gears, for us, there is nothing that beats the feel of consistent and powerful braking, and that’s a big reason why for us the extra $300 for the Trek is small potatoes. In addition to the brakes are the tubeless-ready wheels and 32mm tires, which are a boon in contemporary component spec. What really seals the deal in favor of the Trek is the Isospeed decoupler that simply delivers an unmatched level of ride compliance that’s hard to beat.

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

Tour of Poland Stage 2

AND STILL GRAVEL GROWS: FEZZARI VS. FUJI

A MOMENT IN TIME, 2013: PETER SAGAN GETS BUSTED

THROWBACK THURSDAY, 2017: FIRST RIDE ON CAMPAGNOLO DISC BRAKES

TREK-SEGAFREDO PEDALS INTO 2023 ON TIME

Comments are closed.

We and our {{count}} partners use cookies and other tracking technologies to improve your experience on our website. We may store and/or access information on a device and process personal data, such as your IP address and browsing data, for personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development. Additionally, we may utilize precise geolocation data and identification through device scanning.

Please note that your consent will be valid across all our subdomains. You can change or withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the “Consent Preferences” button at the bottom of your screen. We respect your choices and are committed to providing you with a transparent and secure browsing experience.

Privacy Overview

• Most purposes explained in this notice rely on the storage or accessing of information from your device when you use an app or visit a website. For example, a vendor or publisher might need to store a cookie on your device during your first visit on a website, to be able to recognise your device during your next visits (by accessing this cookie each time).
• A car manufacturer wants to promote its electric vehicles to environmentally conscious users living in the city after office hours. The advertising is presented on a page with related content (such as an article on climate change actions) after 6:30 p.m. to users whose non-precise location suggests that they are in an urban zone.
• A large producer of watercolour paints wants to carry out an online advertising campaign for its latest watercolour range, diversifying its audience to reach as many amateur and professional artists as possible and avoiding showing the ad next to mismatched content (for instance, articles about how to paint your house). The number of times that the ad has been presented to you is detected and limited, to avoid presenting it too often.
• If you read several articles about the best bike accessories to buy, this information could be used to create a profile about your interest in bike accessories. Such a profile may be used or improved later on, on the same or a different website or app to present you with advertising for a particular bike accessory brand. If you also look at a configurator for a vehicle on a luxury car manufacturer website, this information could be combined with your interest in bikes to refine your profile and make an assumption that you are interested in luxury cycling gear.
• An apparel company wishes to promote its new line of high-end baby clothes. It gets in touch with an agency that has a network of clients with high income customers (such as high-end supermarkets) and asks the agency to create profiles of young parents or couples who can be assumed to be wealthy and to have a new child, so that these can later be used to present advertising within partner apps based on those profiles.
• An online retailer wants to advertise a limited sale on running shoes. It wants to target advertising to users who previously looked at running shoes on its mobile app. Tracking technologies might be used to recognise that you have previously used the mobile app to consult running shoes, in order to present you with the corresponding advertisement on the app.
• A profile created for personalised advertising in relation to a person having searched for bike accessories on a website can be used to present the relevant advertisement for bike accessories on a mobile app of another organisation.
• You read several articles on how to build a treehouse on a social media platform. This information might be added to a profile to mark your interest in content related to outdoors as well as do-it-yourself guides (with the objective of allowing the personalisation of content, so that for example you are presented with more blog posts and articles on treehouses and wood cabins in the future).
• You have viewed three videos on space exploration across different TV apps. An unrelated news platform with which you have had no contact builds a profile based on that viewing behaviour, marking space exploration as a topic of possible interest for other videos.
• You read articles on vegetarian food on a social media platform and then use the cooking app of an unrelated company. The profile built about you on the social media platform will be used to present you vegetarian recipes on the welcome screen of the cooking app.
• You have viewed three videos about rowing across different websites. An unrelated video sharing platform will recommend five other videos on rowing that may be of interest to you when you use your TV app, based on a profile built about you when you visited those different websites to watch online videos.
• You have clicked on an advertisement about a “black Friday” discount by an online shop on the website of a publisher and purchased a product. Your click will be linked to this purchase. Your interaction and that of other users will be measured to know how many clicks on the ad led to a purchase.
• You are one of very few to have clicked on an advertisement about an “international appreciation day” discount by an online gift shop within the app of a publisher. The publisher wants to have reports to understand how often a specific ad placement within the app, and notably the “international appreciation day” ad, has been viewed or clicked by you and other users, in order to help the publisher and its partners (such as agencies) optimise ad placements.
• You have read a blog post about hiking on a mobile app of a publisher and followed a link to a recommended and related post. Your interactions will be recorded as showing that the initial hiking post was useful to you and that it was successful in interesting you in the related post. This will be measured to know whether to produce more posts on hiking in the future and where to place them on the home screen of the mobile app.
• You were presented a video on fashion trends, but you and several other users stopped watching after 30 seconds. This information is then used to evaluate the right length of future videos on fashion trends.
• The owner of an online bookstore wants commercial reporting showing the proportion of visitors who consulted and left its site without buying, or consulted and bought the last celebrity autobiography of the month, as well as the average age and the male/female distribution of each category. Data relating to your navigation on its site and to your personal characteristics is then used and combined with other such data to produce these statistics.
• An advertiser wants to better understand the type of audience interacting with its adverts. It calls upon a research institute to compare the characteristics of users who interacted with the ad with typical attributes of users of similar platforms, across different devices. This comparison reveals to the advertiser that its ad audience is mainly accessing the adverts through mobile devices and is likely in the 45-60 age range.
• A technology platform working with a social media provider notices a growth in mobile app users, and sees based on their profiles that many of them are connecting through mobile connections. It uses a new technology to deliver ads that are formatted for mobile devices and that are low-bandwidth, to improve their performance.
• An advertiser is looking for a way to display ads on a new type of consumer device. It collects information regarding the way users interact with this new kind of device to determine whether it can build a new mechanism for displaying advertising on this type of device.
• A travel magazine has published an article on its website about the new online courses proposed by a language school, to improve travelling experiences abroad. The school’s blog posts are inserted directly at the bottom of the page, and selected on the basis of your non-precise location (for instance, blog posts explaining the course curriculum for different languages than the language of the country you are situated in).
• A sports news mobile app has started a new section of articles covering the most recent football games. Each article includes videos hosted by a separate streaming platform showcasing the highlights of each match. If you fast-forward a video, this information may be used to select a shorter video to play next.
• An advertising intermediary delivers ads from various advertisers to its network of partnering websites. It notices a large increase in clicks on ads relating to one advertiser, and uses data regarding the source of the clicks to determine that 80% of the clicks come from bots rather than humans.
• Clicking on a link in an article might normally send you to another page or part of the article. To achieve this, 1°) your browser sends a request to a server linked to the website, 2°) the server answers back (“here is the article you asked for”), using technical information automatically included in the request sent by your device, to properly display the information / images that are part of the article you asked for. Technically, such exchange of information is necessary to deliver the content that appears on your screen.

• MAGAZINE OFFERS
• BIKE INSURANCE
• Best Products
• Maintenance
• Accessories
• Long-Term Reviews
• BikeRadar Podcast
• First Look Friday
• Bike of the Week
• Tech Features
• Routes and Rides
• Bike Galleries
• BikeRadar Bargains
• Buyer's Guides
• Fitness & Training
• Sizing & Fit
• Mountain Biking UK
• Cycling Plus

11 of the best aluminium gravel bikes in 2024

Our pick of the best aluminium gravel bikes

Russell Burton / Our Media

Paul Norman

The best aluminium gravel bikes – also often called alloy gravel bikes – offer great value for money. Since aluminium gravel bikes are cheaper to manufacture than carbon gravel bikes or titanium gravel bikes, they are ideal if you're just dipping your toe into gravel riding and don't want to spend too much.

Aluminium gravel bikes also tend to make great commuter bikes , because they're robust and can take wide tyres but still usually enable you to fit gravel mudguards and a rear rack.

Here's our pick of the best aluminium gravel bikes that our expert testers – who clock up thousands of hours of ride time and years of experience between them – have ridden and rated.

Towards the bottom of the page, we've got a buyer's guide to aluminium gravel bikes , which explains why they feature among the best gravel bikes .

If you're attracted to aluminium gravel bikes because of their value for money, you can also check out our guides to the best gravel bikes under £2,000 and the best gravel bikes under £1,000 .

Best aluminium gravel bikes in 2024

Boardman adv 8.9.

• Buy now from Halfords

• £1,150 as tested
• Pros: Good spec for the money; energetic ride; proper all-rounder
• Cons: Handlebar can transmit vibration at high tyre pressures

The Boardman ADV 8.9 uses the brand's alloy frame. It still offers excellent value and spent two years as our Budget Bike of the Year . Its alloy frame provides plenty of stiffness for good power transmission and it's equipped with quality Boardman finishing kit.

It's equipped with a Shimano GRX RX400 10-speed groupset, which gives a wide range of ratios, mechanical disc brakes and tubeless-ready wheels. Although the cables run externally, the shifting still functions well. It's about the cheapest you can get a 'real' gravel bike that rides well and doesn't make too many spec compromises.

We've also reviewed the Boardman ADV 8.6 , which has the same alloy frame but is equipped with a 9-speed Shimano Sora groupset and offers an even lower-priced entry into the world of gravel riding .

• Read our full Boardman ADV 8.9 review

Canyon Grail 6

• £1,649 / $1,699 / €1,499 / AU$2,349 as tested
• Pros: Top components for the cash; amazing performance for the money; gravel-specific gear ratios
• Cons: Older model had better spec for the price

Unlike the carbon Grail, the alloy version has a conventional gravel handlebar and stem setup. Some riders may prefer this.

Canyon offers a quality spec for the price, with a 10-speed Shimano GRX RX400 groupset including the hydraulic disc brakes. The alloy wheels come from DT Swiss with quality 40mm Schwalbe G-One Bite gravel tyres.

The gravel-specific gearing means there's the range for off-road riding, and that's paired with a confidence-inspiring ride on gravel and decent tarmac performance. We've also reviewed the women's-specific Canyon Grail 6 WMN , although that bike has now been superseded by the offer of smaller sizes of the standard Grail 6.

• Read our full Canyon Grail 6 review

Focus Atlas 6.8

• £1,899 / €1,999 / AU$3,099 as tested
• Pros: Touring and bikepacking-friendly; progressive geometry; excellent-value package
• Cons: Boost spacing limits wheel upgrades; top tube bag rattles

Focus makes a carbon Atlas, which sits above this good-value alloy model. The alloy Atlas we've tested is well configured for bikepacking, with plenty of mounting points, but its progressive geometry means it's also effective for more technical off-road use.

The groupset is a mix of Shimano's top GRX 800 and mid-range GRX 600. That's paired with tough Alex rims on wheels with Boost spacing and 45mm WTB Riddler gravel bike tyres . The Boost spacing means any wheel upgrade is likely to require an MTB wheelset .

• Read our full Focus Atlas 6.8 review

Kinesis Tripster AT

• £1,850 (mudguards extra £60) as tested
• Pros: Wonderfully thought-out frame; great handling and lots of fun; good mudguards
• Cons: Occasional mis-shifts; slippery saddle

With AT signifying all terrain, the Tripster AT from Sussex-based Kinesis is a bike designed for all-road riding including gravel, tarmac, commutes and winter training. As such, it's very practical with mounts for mudguards, but also space for 52mm tyres if you want to head off-road.

The Tripster AT is an enjoyable ride with enough stiffness for sprints, as well as tackling gnarlier off-road terrain. There's the gearing from the SRAM 1x drivetrain to tackle climbs and the simplicity to manage hostile conditions. We rated the sturdy mudguards, which are an extra, highly.

• Read our full Kinesis Tripster AT review

Voodoo Nakisi

• £650 as tested
• Pros: Cheap and cheerful; well kitted out
• Cons: Heavy

Voodoo is Halfords' in-house MTB brand, but it has strayed into gravel territory with the Nakisi, which is a bargain gravel option, although it could cover commuting duties as well. Mounts for mudguards and a rack ensure the bike's versatility and there's wide tyre clearance too.

Despite its price, Voodoo has specced a 9-speed Shimano Sora groupset, rather than the cheaper 8-speed Claris. This provides a good gear range and enables you to tackle hills more comfortably despite the bike's 11kg-plus weight.

• Read our full Voodoo Nakisi review

Ribble Gravel AL Enthusiast SRAM Rival 1x

• £1,999 / $1,967 / €1,964 / AU$2,853 as tested
• Pros: Great on technical terrain; fairly lightweight build; well-specced for the price
• Cons: Long reach; draggy tyres; large 42-tooth chainring

We were impressed by the quality of the welds on the Ribble Gravel AL, which offers a quality spec with 650b Mavic Allroad wheels, making for great capability over rougher ground. There's tyre clearance for 47mm 650b or 45mm 700c rubber.

As usual, Ribble gives you plenty of stock spec and upgrade options, with the review bike featuring SRAM Rival 1 11-speed mechanical shifting. Finishing kit comes from Ribble's in-house Level brand.

• Read our full Ribble Gravel AL SRAM Rival 1x review

Cannondale Topstone Alloy 2

• £1,800 / $1,925 / €2,199 / AU$3,199 as tested
• Pros: Plentiful accessory mounts boost versatility; great tyres for light gravel and road riding
• Cons: 10-speed groupset; relatively narrow tyres

Cannondale has been making quality aluminium bike frames since the 1990s and its accumulated expertise shows in the Topstone Alloy. Post-update in mid-2022, the bike now has 45mm tyre clearance, extra mounting points and features dropped seatstays.

The spec tested includes 10-speed Shimano GRX shifting and 37mm Vittoria Terreno Dry tyres on WTB rims. The tyres are a bit narrow and smooth-treaded for more technical or muddy rides, but roll well on smoother surfaces and tarmac.

• Read our full Cannondale Topstone Alloy 2 review

Genesis Fugio 30

• £2,000 as tested 
• Pros: Fun to ride; competitive price; good looks
• Cons: Slow on tarmac; some downgraded parts 

The latest Genesis Fugio has traded steel for aluminium, shedding roughly 500g and proving to be great fun to ride.

It’s not the fastest on tarmac, but with relaxed geometry and clearance for 57mm tyres, it will be perfect for riding over tough terrain and tackling big adventures.

Genesis has downgraded a few components, but the Fugio 30 is still competitively priced at £2,000.

• Read our full Genesis Fugio 30 review

Merida Silex 400

• £1,400 / €1,499 / AU$2,199 as tested
• Pros: Unusual MTB-inspired geometry; quality hydraulic disc groupset; good overall value
• Cons: Sticky freehub; narrow rim width

The Merida Silex comes at gravel from an MTB perspective, which translates to a long reach and a high stack. Along with the short stem, this makes the bike eminently flickable off-road and leads to great handling.

Other features set the bike up for mixed use, with mudguard and rack mounts and fork leg bosses for bikepacking . The 400 spec is equipped with 10-speed Shimano GRX gravel shifting. We'd go wider than the 38mm Maxxis Rambler tyres provided for more off-road grip though.

The bike can fit either 700c or 650b gravel wheels .

We've also reviewed the carbon-framed Merida Silex 6000 , if you're looking for a higher spec.

• Read our full Merida Silex 400 review

Nukeproof Digger RS V3

• £3,000 / $2,400 / €3,145 as tested
• Pros : Integrated dropper post; high-spec wheels; excellent fork; rack and mudguard mounts
• Cons : Lacks speed on mellow gravel

The Nukeproof Digger RS V3 is a mountain bike brand's take on a gravel bike.

The superb RockShox Rudy Ultimate XPLR 30mm-travel fork enhances the Digger's technical performance – you can unleash it on steep, bumpy trails better suited to an enduro mountain bike .

Stability on rough stuff comes from the 50cm-wide handlebar and slack head angle, further boosting your confidence. But the Digger feels a bit sluggish on faster gravel roads and when climbing out of the saddle.

On a £3,000 / $2,400 bike, the DT Swiss GR1600 wheels are a relatively premium option. The SRAM Rival 1 groupset works well, but feels outdated compared to newer Apex 1x, 12-speed mechanical.

• Read our full Nukeproof Digger RS V3 review 

• £2,469 / $2,500 as tested
• Pros: Magnesium alloy frameset with novel trussed chainstays; good vibration absorption; quality spec for the price
• Cons: Creaky seatpost

Okay, the A/1 is not aluminium, but it is alloy (as are steel gravel bikes and titanium gravel bikes) , in this case magnesium alloy. Vaast says it's lighter than steel, aluminium or titanium, but stronger and more corrosion-resistant than everything but titanium.

There's a dropped driveside chainstay with a truss, which provides room for 40mm 700c or 47mm 650b tyres. The wheels are Stan's with Maxxis Rambler tyres and the test bike was equipped with a 1x Shimano GRX RX600 11-speed drivetrain with a carbon Praxis crankset.

The geometry is designed for fast gravel grinding and you can fit a gravel dropper post . There's a sprightly spring to the frame over rougher ground, that doesn't detract from the stiff, responsive pedal feel. The straight-legged carbon fork is a little at odds with the plusher rear, however. The main bugbear was a creaking seatpost.

• Read our full Vaast A/1 review

Buyer’s guide to aluminium gravel bikes

What are the advantages of aluminium gravel bikes.

Aluminium gravel bikes tend to be the entry-level offering in the gravel bike ranges of larger brands, with pricier models swapping to carbon fibre frames. As such, they offer a cheaper alternative if you're just getting into gravel and aren't sure if it's for you or what you want.

That also means they tend to offer lower-priced specs, which is an advantage when it comes time for parts replacement – components wear quickly in off-road conditions.

As with the best aluminium road bikes , you may find you get more for your money from an aluminium gravel bike.

Are aluminium gravel bikes heavy?

Not necessarily, it depends on how they're constructed. Hydroforming changes the shape and wall thickness of aluminium tubing and can dramatically decrease the weight of the bike's frame. You'll see frames referred to as triple-butted when the tubing has been made thinner in its middle than at its ends.

In some cases, aluminium frames can be lighter than similarly priced carbon frames, so don't discount aluminium gravel bikes because of their weight.

A few choice component upgrades, such as a swap to the best gravel wheels , could also dramatically decrease the bike's weight and change its performance.

Aluminium gravel bikes vs carbon gravel bikes

As mentioned above, brands tend to offer their carbon gravel bikes with higher specs. Combined with a lower frame weight that can appreciably decrease the mass of a carbon gravel bike over an aluminium one, particularly if you're prepared to pay more.

You're also more likely to find items such as SRAM's 12-speed wireless AXS groupset on carbon gravel bikes than on aluminium gravel bikes.

As entry-level models, aluminium gravel bikes tend to be generalist machines designed for all-round gravel riding.

However, gravel bikes are becoming more specialist, so if you're looking for a gravel race bike or a gravel bike to tackle steeper, more technical terrain, you're more likely to find such a bike with a carbon frame.

Share this article

• Terms & Conditions
• Subscribe to our magazines
• Manage preferences

• Forum Listing
• Marketplace
• Advanced Search
• Classic Forums
• Bikes, Frames and Forks

Trek Alpha SL Aluminum versus Carbon

• Add to quote

My first road bike was 1999 Trek 2200 and I am still riding it. I stopped riding the bike on the road for quite some time as all our roads in my rural area are going to chipseal. (Man I hate chipseal!!!) I was also a lot heavier and last year I finally got my chit together and lost some weight. I am riding at 220lbs right now and want to get down to about 190-195. I am 6'3" and a heavy build, more of a football player than a cyclist. Anyway, I must admit I am pretty curious to check out a Domane 4.3, 4.5, or maybe a 5.2 if I could find a great deal. My questions is how much of a softer ride am I going to get going to Trek Domane Carbon over the Alpha SL Aluminum of my 2200. My 2200 has the Rolf Vector wheels and I am riding on 700x23s at 130 pounds. The problem is that any riding I am going to do at a bike store is going to be smooth blacktop and I have to drive several hours to get to a store that has bikes in stock anyway. I am not complaining about the ride quality of my 2200 but if i could get something that was substantially better it would be worth my trouble to drive several hours to a bike store to try and ride one. Who doesn't like to get a new bike?  

cxwrench said: The one thing I can tell you for sure is that you should be on bigger tires, 25mm should do nicely, and a LOT lower pressure. 23mm at 130?!? Cazzo... Click to expand...

Yeah I am in the process of getting new tires. I am running some Conti Grand Prixs that I used when the roads were a lot better, I just have not had a chance to change them.  

Since you're new, here's some info on pressure. I'm 170lbs, my tubeless wheels have 25mm rear/23mm frt. I use 85rr/80frt. On my normal, tubed clincher wheels I have a Pro4 25mm rr, and a Bontrager 25mm front(it's about 2mm narrower than the Michelin) and I use 90rr/80frt. On my tubular wheels w/ Challenge 22mm tires (I need to swap them for some wider ones) I use 95rr/80frt. I have NEVER had a pinch flat...ever. Not one.  

If you are after a softer ride, why not go modern steel instead. The weight penalty on the frame will only be around one pound which will be insignificant when compared to the total weight of rider+bike, but even then you could save the weight else where with lighter components. Personally I think over 200 lb riders are better off on a steel bike which should hold up better.  

I dont know, i have had a few steel bikes over the years. My Domane beats them all hands down.  

Thanks for all the feedback, very much appreciated! It is not that the ride is so harsh that I cannot handle it I mean I am not in the saddle for several hours at a time. I am kicking the idea of a new bike around and was more or less just wondering if the Domane is the answer. If I am going to spend 3500.00 and not be able to go wow what a difference then what is the point. If I have to convince myself, because I spent money, that I think I am getting a better ride then what is the point. Sure I will be getting new ultegra but I can get along nicely with 13-14year old 105. I do like the idea of the endurance rider position though. I am going for a longer ride today and will adjust pressure. Thanks for all the tips, still interested in feedback on the frame materials.  

When you consider what can be done w/ carbon layup it becomes obvious that you can't come close to all the qualities one would want w/ any metal. Stiffness where needed, compliance where desired...you can do so much more w/ carbon, I'll probably never ride another 'metal' bike again. The Domane has the best ride of any bike I've ever been on, hands down. Period. No contest.  

Not 100% true. When you look at modern steel bikes the same quality steel is not used through-out the bike, for very much the same reason. Plus you can get a top of the line Steel frame for less than a top of the line Carbon frame. I'm not going to argue that Steel is unquestionably superior here, but one of the arguments in favor of Carbon is not 100% accurate, and then there's the cost advantage and the structural integrity advantage of Steel over Carbon.  

You need wider tires. The pressure is about right for 23s at your weight, so you need to go wider to drop the pressure. Frame material won't make a detectable difference compared to that.  

+1. You can pretty much have the ride of the carbon model with a nice set of wheels and tires. Try something like a set of Shimano RS80s or Ultegra wheels. They can be had for under $500 if you look online. You'll save weight with the right tires and get a better ride. the carbon models have higher level wheels and tires so they should ride better, but I bet if you were to put the same wheels/tires on your aluminum model, you couldn't tell the difference between the alum and carbon model.  

So lets assume a budget of about 750.00 what wheels, hubs, spokes should a person be looking at. What tires, I assume move up to 700x28. Thanks for all the suggestions.  

I have a 2006 aluminium specialized allez running 25mm tires at 90psi. Last year I bought a 2012 cannondale supersix (carbon) with 23mm tires at 120psi. I rode those two bikes back to back and I was astounded how smooth and comfortable the carbon bike was over the aluminium one. I took the as out for TPA test ride with the view of NOT buying it, but after the test ride, I just had to have it. You should test ride a carbon bike and see how you feel.  

Glad you mentioned it. Now try a CAAD10 and SuperSix with the same wheel/tire combo. They feel identical. Tire do make a difference but wheels are equally important.  

Yeah I think I am going to try and find a shop that has one and see if they will let me spend some time on one. May have to visit the sister in law 4.5 hours away. That city has a trek dealer with a guru sizer and shows that they have a couple of Domanes in stock. I would love to take my old Trek or at least the wheels and ride the bikes back to back.  

Do yourself a favor and take your bike. That way you will really know if its the right thing for you.  

I had a 1999 Trek 2300 Alpha SL that I just sold. With the right wheels and tires, there wasn't much difference in it and my carbon Cervelo RS. Those Trek alpha frames were pretty good and I weighed 220 to 230 when riding that frame. Wheels that I have found to be quite good are Mavic open pro, 32 spoke and Velocity Spartacus - the version marketed for heavier riders. The Spartacus is one wheel I would never have guessed would give a quality ride but it does. Terrible were Mavic kysrium elites. The Rolf Vectors were somewhere in-between. My current tire of choice is Vittoria rubino pro slick, 25mm. With all that said, chipseal is going to beat you to death. You can probably fit 28mm tires on that frame - if so, that would be my recommendation. I am also a firm believer in the need for at least two bikes...just in case.  

Good post, thanks!  

• ?            
• 205.2K members

Top Contributors this Month

Trek takes the fight to Garmin with new CarBack Radar rear light

Brand promises 'best in class experience compared to Garmin Varia and other competitors'

Trek, known predominantly for its bikes, has long made a selection of genuinely excellent bike lights under its Bontrager subsidiary. Its Flare RT, for example, has long existed in our guide to the best bike lights , as has a selection of its front lights. 

In recent years, that Bontrager name has been phased out somewhat, but if today's news is anything to go by, the product development continues apace, as the Trek range has an all-new flagship light on offer, complete with inbuilt radar technology, called the CarBack.

Now, I know what you're thinking, and much like the existing – longstanding – Garmin Varia RTL515, Trek's new product promises to combine the performance of the brand's market-leading rear light technology with a rear-facing radar that will alert you of approaching traffic from behind. 

Trek says it will connect to your bike computer via ANT+ or an app on your smartphone (presumably via Bluetooth), and allow you to see where on the road behind you a car is at any given time, and how quickly they may be approaching.

Like its Flare RT rear light, Trek describes it as a Daytime Running Light, promising visibility from up to two kilometres away. Meanwhile, it also says the new inbuilt radar is able to detect vehicles at up to 240 metres. 

Radar technology is well revered by the Cyclingnews product testers. It integrates naturally into riding habits and gives a real sense of increased safety, but Trek knows that it's got stiff competition from Garmin, whose Varia radar and rear-light combos have been on the market for over half a decade already. 

But Trek remains confident. In the product's media release, Trek explicitly calls out its competitor by promising a "best in class experience compared to Garmin Varia and other competitors."

Get The Leadout Newsletter

The latest race content, interviews, features, reviews and expert buying guides, direct to your inbox!

Those other competitors are currently few in number. Garmin's patent on the technology expired in 2021, according to reports by DC Rainmaker , and two lesser-known companies were both quick to jump on the bandwagon with Bryton launching the Gardia and Magene launching the Magicshine Seemee in the summer of 2022. 

Trek's entry into the market might be a little delayed by comparison, but the on-paper specs appear competitive. It will feature USB-C charging, IPX7 waterproofing, and connectivity to all of the major bike computers . It will also boast a newly designed mount that Trek says will work with all bikes, including its Madone aero bike.

It will be priced at £169.99 / $199.99 / €199.99 / AU$299, and is available to buy at Trek Bikes right away. 

Thank you for reading 5 articles in the past 30 days*

Join now for unlimited access

Enjoy your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1

*Read any 5 articles for free in each 30-day period, this automatically resets

After your trial you will be billed £4.99 $7.99 €5.99 per month, cancel anytime. Or sign up for one year for just £49 $79 €59

Try your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1

As the Tech Editor here at Cyclingnews, Josh leads on content relating to all-things tech, including bikes, kit and components in order to cover product launches and curate our world-class buying guides, reviews and deals. Alongside this, his love for WorldTour racing and eagle eyes mean he's often breaking tech stories from the pro peloton too. 

On the bike, 32-year-old Josh has been riding and racing since his early teens. He started out racing cross country when 26-inch wheels and triple chainsets were still mainstream, but he found favour in road racing in his early 20s and has never looked back. He's always training for the next big event and is keen to get his hands on the newest tech to help. He enjoys a good long ride on road or gravel, but he's most alive when he's elbow-to-elbow in a local criterium. 

Assos Equipe RS Jersey S11 review: Continuing to set the standard

A decent wheelset away from greatness: Basso Venta R review

Helmet visors are back! POC’s new Procen Air is a LOT faster than its other road helmets, and it helps you hear better too

Most Popular

When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Learn more.

Trek Vs Specialized Bikes – Which Has the Better Bikes?

You've decided to buy a bike, and you've narrowed your search down to two brands, Trek and specialized. Which one of them offers more value for your money? It's the classic case of Trek vs. Specialized. Well, Both of these cycle manufacturers are established and have their crowds of a loyal fan base. They both offer a diverse range of bikes across categories and budgets.

But there has got to be a clear winner between the two brands when it comes to deciding the reliability of their bikes, right? Frankly speaking, the answer isn't a clear cut one. It is true that Trek houses more varieties of bikes than Specialized. But the bikes in both brands boast high-quality components . Plus, the bikes from both brands do not vary too much in terms of their price range.

Both Trek and Specialized have a wide range of road bikes, mountain bikes , and even kids' bikes to their credit. As many characteristics as bikes from these brands share, they also have that many differences between them.

Before we get into the nitty-gritty of which brand has the better bikes, here's a brief recap on what each brand stands for individually.

Trek Vs Specialized Bikes Comparison

Overview of trek.

Trek bikes are most popularly associated with the legendary Lance Armstrong. It was on these bikes that this Cycling champ won all of his Tour de France championships. Therefore, it comes as no surprise that Trek is popularly known for their road bikes.

This American company made its entry into the bike market in 1976, but most of its bikes are made in Taiwan. Today, the brand has a commendable range of bikes for men, women, and kids. You can also be sure to find Trek bikes for every level of rider and for different riding terrains.

• The manufacturer has an extensive range of bikes for all kinds of riders.
• Trek bikes can be customized in more ways than one.
• The brand is most famous for its road bikes.
• Trek bikes can be pricey compared to cycles from other brands.

Overview of Specialized

Specialized began its journey of manufacturing bikes with their iconic road and touring bikes. Then in 1995, it added on to its accolades with its range of mountain bikes. This range of mountain bikes was aptly named 'The Full Force.' Today, Specialized is synonymous with mountain bikes, with the company even sponsoring Loic Bruni, the downhill world champion.

• Specialized is well known for its range of mountain bikes.
• Like Trek, Specialized also caters to riders of all levels.
• Specialized bikes are more expensive than Trek bikes.

Feature Comparison

When you are a beginner rider, it can sometimes be difficult to tell the minor differences between different bike models. But experienced riders are likely to notice even the slightest of differences. This happens especially for lower-end bike ranges. The high-end bikes typically boast quite visible differences in design, geometry, or components.

Regardless of that, bikes from Trek and Specialized both have their own unique appeal. So at the end of the day, which bike model or brand you decide to go with boils down to personal preference. Don't hold back from checking out as many options of bikes from both manufacturers. Doing so will only benefit you.

To help simplify your quest for the ideal bike for yourself, we've compiled a list of differences between Trek bikes and Specialized bikes. Take a look:

Customization

Trek allows riders the flexibility to build a bike of your liking. You have the option to choose your bike's fork, frame, and other parts so as to customize it. Pretty neat, isn't it?

Specialized has a wide range of bike types and styles, but this manufacturer doesn't offer customization services.

The Design of Their Bikes' Rear Suspension

Trek takes pride in their Active Braking Pivot and Full Floater rear suspension designs. The Full Floater rear suspension design system works in a way that prevents the shock mount's movement from increasing when you pedal. This way, there is more pedaling efficiency.

The Active Braking Pivot rear suspension design system works similar to the braking systems in modern cars. Here, the rear suspension allows more chatter, so your bike's wheels skid less.

Specialized bikes generally use the Future Shock rear suspension design. Incorporating this design into their bikes helps riders journey over rough roads with ease. This design system also allows more control and stability for riders.

The Pricing of Their Bikes

Bikes from Trek or Specialized aren't exactly cheap, especially if we're talking about mountain bikes. Even so, both manufacturers offer lower-end bikes just as they do high-end ones. The price range of bikes from Trek and Specialized are almost on par with each other. In this case, the bike model or the type of bike determines its price.

The Materials They Use

In most cases, both Trek and Specialized use the same materials with their bikes. With either brand, you'll find that they utilize premium aluminum for their lower-end bikes. Moreover, they both save carbon fiber for their higher-end bikes.

Components & Parts

This is another area where both manufacturers find common ground. They both use SRAM and Shimano components for their bikes. So if you want a fair comparison of bikes from these manufacturers, the fair way to do so is to compare bikes that are on the same price range.

Range of Mountain Bikes

Trek's range of mountain bikes covers cross-country mountain bikes, hardtail mountain bikes, aluminum mountain bikes, 27.5 m mountain bikes, carbon mountain bikes, entry-level, and beginner mountain bikes, and 29er mountain bikes.

Take the Trek Procaliber 9.6 mountain bike, for instance. It is a heavy duty mtb that allows you to experience the thrill of riding a carbon race bike that boasts IsoSpeed, all at a fairly affordable price. This bike is equipped with solid features, and it also provides you with the option to upgrade its parts easily if you want to.

Specialized's range of mountain bikes includes cross country mountain bikes, trail mountain bikes, and BMX/dirt jump mountain bikes.

The Chisel Comp is a classic example of an exemplary cross-country mountain bike from Specialized. It impresses with its superior performance and budget-friendly price tag. This bike's aluminum frame is responsive and facilitates easy handling when riding over technical courses. Getting you ahead of other riders are the bike's fast-rolling wheels. Its wheels boast high-speed control when riding on difficult terrain.

Range o f Road Bikes

Under its road bikes category, Trek houses performance, women's road bikes , aluminum, lightweight, endurance, carbon, and disc brake road bikes. These bikes typically feature IsoSpeed or Aerodynamic designs.

This Trek Domane 5 embodies everything this brand aims for with its road bikes - versatility, speed, and a smooth ride. It features a carbon frame (OCLV), which has both rear and front IsoSpeed. This detailing helps smooth out bumps on the road and does its bit to reduce fatigue on long rides. The Domane SL5 road bike from Trek is ideal for riders looking for a racing bike that is quick and able to withstand long distances.

For Specialized, their range of road bikes includes performance bikes, triathlon bikes, and gravel bikes.

A Specialized road bike that justifies this manufacturer's credibility is the Tarmac Disc Comp. It offers stiff competition with its impressive climbing responsiveness and great descending capabilities. This bike comes with hydraulic disc brakes, which boast precise shifting and good stopping power.

Features such as its cartridge hubs, which are sealed, and its reliable wheels equip this bike to confidently aid you in conquering highways, challenging terrains, and street corners. This Specialized road bike also comes with 24 spokes on its front and rear. These spokes help maintain the bike's weight and contribute to its durability.

What are the Differences and Similarities Between Trek Bikes & Specialized Bikes?

Initially, Trek was mainly associated with making top-notch cross country bikes. The company changed the game when they started manufacturing other styles of bikes. Today, Trek boasts an impressive range of bikes for all sorts of riding feats – road bikes, mountain bikes, and hybrid bikes .

Not one to be caught lacking, Specialized entices with its own versions of top-notch bikes for every type of rider. They are best known for their mountain bikes, but they also make road bikes , turbo E-bikes, active bikes, and kids' bikes. Specialized bikes are the ideal choice for you if you want precision, good quality components, strength, and aren't afraid of financially splurging on a bike.

What are the main differences between full suspension mountain bikes from Trek and Specialized?

Full suspension mountain bikes from Trek and Specialized both offer a comfortable and smooth ride on rough terrain, but there are a few key differences to consider. Trek full suspension bikes tend to be more versatile and can handle a wider range of terrain, while Specialized bikes are often designed with a specific type of rider and terrain in mind. Trek also tends to use higher-end components and materials, such as carbon fiber, in their full suspension bikes, making them generally more expensive than Specialized models.

How do Trek and Specialized compare when it comes to mountain biking performance?

Both Trek and Specialized are highly regarded for their mountain biking performance, but there are some key differences to consider. Trek bikes are known for their versatility and ability to handle a wide range of terrain, while Specialized bikes are often designed with specific types of riders and terrain in mind. Trek also tends to use higher-end components and materials, such as carbon fiber, in their mountain bikes, which can give them a performance edge. Ultimately, the best choice will depend on your specific needs and preferences as a mountain biker.

Are Trek and Specialized considered to be among the top mountain bike brands?

Yes, both Trek and Specialized are widely considered to be among the best mountain bike brands in the industry. They both have a long history of innovation and performance in the world of mountain biking, and their bikes are known for their high quality and durability. They are also both respected by professional mountain bikers and are often seen as the go-to choice for serious riders.

What are some key factors to consider when choosing between Trek and Specialized mountain bikes?

When choosing between Trek and Specialized mountain bikes, there are several key factors to consider. These include the type of terrain you will be riding on, your riding style and preferences, and your budget. It's also important to consider the components and materials used in the bikes, as well as the level of support and service offered by the manufacturer. Finally, it can be helpful to talk to other riders and visit a local bike shop to get more information and advice.

Are Trek and Specialized bikes available at local bike shops?

Yes, both Trek and Specialized bikes are widely available at local bike shops. Many bike shops carry a range of models from both brands, and can offer expert advice and support to help you choose the right bike for your needs. In addition, both Trek and Specialized have their own network of authorized dealers, where you can find a wider range of bikes and accessories, as well as specialized service and support.

How do specialized mountain bikes compare to trek bikes in terms of performance and durability on rough terrain?

Both specialized and trek bikes are known for their ability to handle tough, rocky trails, but specialized is generally considered to have an edge in downhill riding. Specialized's advanced suspension systems and use of carbon fiber in their frames give them a more agile, responsive ride on steep, technical trails. Trek, on the other hand, is known for their durability and reliability, making them a solid choice for riders who value long-lasting performance.

Are specialized and trek bikes in the same price range?

Yes, specialized and trek bikes are generally in the same price range, with entry-level models starting around $500 and high-end models reaching over $5,000. However, specialized's use of carbon fiber in their frames often makes their bikes slightly more expensive than comparable trek models.

What are the key differences between specialized and trek's electric mountain bike offerings?

Specialized and trek both offer a range of electric mountain bikes, but specialized's e-bikes are generally more performance-oriented and designed for more aggressive riders. Specialized's e-bikes feature more powerful motors and larger battery packs, allowing them to tackle steep, technical trails with ease. Trek's e-bikes, on the other hand, are more geared towards leisurely, casual rides, with smaller motors and batteries that are better suited for flat, smooth trails.

Should a new mountain biker choose a hardtail or full-suspension bike from specialized or trek?

As a new mountain biker, it's important to consider your riding style and the type of trails you'll be riding on when deciding between a hardtail or full-suspension bike. If you're planning to ride mostly on smooth, well-groomed trails, a hardtail bike from specialized or trek will provide a lightweight, efficient ride that's easy to handle. However, if you're planning to tackle more challenging, technical trails, a full-suspension bike from specialized or trek will offer more control and comfort on rough, rocky terrain.

How do specialized and trek's entry-level mountain bikes compare in terms of quality and value?

Both specialized and trek offer a range of entry-level mountain bikes that are designed to provide a high-quality, affordable option for new mountain bikers. Specialized's entry-level bikes are typically made with lightweight aluminum frames, while trek's entry-level bikes are often made with a combination of aluminum and carbon fiber. Both specialized and trek offer a wide range of components and features on their entry-level bikes, so it's important to carefully compare the specs and prices of each brand to find the best value for your needs.

The Final Verdict

Every component in Trek bikes is carefully thought out to enhance the rider's comfort and performance. Most bikes from this manufacturer feature hydraulic disc brakes and trigger shifters. They are also no stranger to Rockshocks forks and SRAM gears. Similarly, Specialized bikes put up fierce competition with equally impressive features and components.

It's okay if you aren't willing to shell out too much cash on a Specialized mountain bike because the company offers lower-end bikes that promise just the same level of high performance. Detailing such as Suntour forks, mechanical disc brakes, and Shimano components make these lesser-priced bikes just as efficient as their more expensive counterparts.

Last Updated on October 14, 2023 by Daniel White

Hola, estoy por comprarme una bicicleta de montaña, no la quiero para competir en extremo como he visto que lo hacen, es mas por diversión, salir con mis perros, de vez en cuando ir a lugares un poco mas "duros" para rodar.

He visto varios modelos, mis opciones que andan por el mismo precio son:

Alubike XTA PRO

Belfort 100 XC 1

Trek Marlin 6

No sé en que basarme, he leído que los mejores componentes las trae la Alubike, tiene frenos de disco hidraúlicos y es shimano AlIVIO.

La trek tiene shimano ALTUS y la Belfort SRAM, de estos últimos no se mucho ya que no he encontrada como compararlos.

Por cual me inclino?

Alguna recomendación de otra marca que ande por el precio de éstas??

Answers & Comments

Verified answer

Obvio, la ALUBIKE.

Por la TREK solo pagarías por la "fama" de la marca pero con un cuadro tristemente Hecho en China y con componentes Shimano de baja gama, y la BELFORT es una marca mexicana recién lanzada con sede en Guadalajara, los grupos SRAM son en lagunos casos mejores que su equivalente Shiamo tanto en bici de Ruta como en de Montaña. En orden descendente yo dejo al Trek abajo de Alubike y la Belfort debe ser la más económica de las tres pero para nada que es una bici corriente o de baja calidad o fea

no me acuerdo bien

Chemistry Transition Metals Help!?

Diesel vehicles in usa.

Best laptop under 400 dollars. ?

Disneyland anual passes.

why wont my 1990 Nissan start?

Short summary george armstrong custer.

Was bedeutet dieses Zeichen?

Rapidshare zu langsam.

0.facebook.com Geht Bei meinem Handy nicht..?

Suche: gescheite animationsfilme, preguntas recomendadas, report "¿qué bicicleta de montaña es mejor alubike, belfort o trek", helpful links, helpful social.

Copyright © 2024 Q2A.MX - All rights reserved.

By providing your information, you agree to our Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy . We use vendors that may also process your information to help provide our services. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA Enterprise and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Star Trek: Strange New Worlds Snags Early Season 4 Renewal — Plus, When Will Season 3 Arrive?

Keisha hatchett, staff editor.

• Share on Facebook
• Show more sharing options
• Share to Flipboard
• Share on LinkedIn
• Submit to Reddit
• Post to Tumblr
• Share on WhatsApp
• Print This Page

Star Trek: Strange New Worlds will fly among the stars for a while longer.

Paramount+ has renewed the sci-fi series for Season 4, TVLine has learned. The show is currently in production on Season 3, which eyes a 2025 debut.

In a joint statement, executive producers Akiva Goldsman, Henry Alonso Myers and Alex Kurtzman expressed their gratitude for the early renewal.

The streamer also revealed that the animated Star Trek: Lower Decks ‘ previously announced Season 5 will now be its last .

Set in the years before Kirk takes the helm of the U.S.S. Enterprise , Strange New Worlds follows Captain Christopher Pike (played by Anson Mount), Number One Una Chin-Riley (Rebecca Romijn) and Science Officer Spock (Ethan Peck) as they explore new worlds around the galaxy.

Rounding out the crew are Nurse Christine Chapel (Jess Bush), La’an Noonien-Singh (Christina Chong), Cadet Nyota Uhura (Celia Rose Gooding), Dr. M’Benga (Babs Olusanmokun) and Lt. Erica Ortegas (Melissa Navia).

In Season 2, Paul Wesley recurred as beloved future Enterprise captain James T. Kirk, and Martin Quinn debuted as iconic engineer Montgomery Scott, aka Scotty, in the finale. (Read our interview with the showrunners about Quinn’s special appearance.)

Variety was first to report the news.

How are you feeling about Star Trek: Strange New Worlds ‘ renewal? What do you hope to see in the upcoming Season 3? Sound off below!

Cancel reply

25 comments.

Email * Your email address will not be published. We will notify you when someone replies.

Star Trek: Strange New Worlds is like Star Trek is meant to be: no season-long arcs that drag along like a rubber band but adventures of the week. I love it!

I guess one-off appeal to people with short attention spans.

i have an extremely short attention span but i love season long arcs. i also love episodic. we’re not all like gabby over there.

Or you know, fans are allowed to have different Star Trek shows that are different from one another.

Why the long wait for season 3? They did the same thing with Evil. Can’t stand Paramount.

The VFX work is very time consuming.

Next Generation managed to have 26 episodes on a consistent yearly schedule. It is ridiculous that shows air 10 episodes every 2 years.

Agreed. It’s absurd.

Shows for streaming and most countries outside the US take 9 months or so to film 10 episodes (or less) regardless of the type of show. Even US network shows can’t turn an episode around in under 8 or 9 days now, and the ones that come close to that wind up looking like expensive soap operas.

There was a strike….

The Writers and Actors strike might have something to do with it.

It takes awhile to create new worlds. The reason these shows look so good. The wait will be worth it

Glad it got renewed! Wish they would have also renewed Discovery. I enjoy the show.

Lots of Star Trek announcements recently, but people should be aware that Paramount is close to being sold (or the controlling shares being sold), so announcements now may not mean anything in a month. Whoever buys the studio would he well advised to take a minute to reassess the Star Trek situation. SNW has its fans, but the success of Picard season 3 shows that a very big audience would like to see a return to the classic Trek universe. They should probably take a minute to figure out what to do, rather than having three or four different Trek franchises floating around.

I hate it that they are making such a long pause and that it has just ten episode, it is ridiculous for a Star Trek show to be that short.

Geez Season 3 not until 2025? I could be dead by then!

Yes! Keep it coming!

Will miss Lower Decks, have enjoyed it much more than SNW and being animated gives it such fun zany stories that would not be physically possible for live action.

But I’m certain you at least watched the crossover episode last season, so it can’t be all bad.

Love Strange New Worlds. It stays close to the original canon. Discovery had potential but fell flat with it’s messaging.

seriously wtf? lower decks ending? budget for that show can’t be that high. most likely strange new worlds will end with 5th season as well given the track record of these shows lately.

Why he’ll does take so long for new seasons to be on. if there value their customers they pick up the place.

Most Popular

You may also like.