us military personnel travel

Official websites use .gov

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

last updated March 13, 2024 6:00 PM EST

Coronavirus: Latest DoD Guidance

The Defense Department continually provides information and resources on a variety of coronavirus-related subjects for members of the DOD community and the general public. For vaccine guidance information, please see the section at the bottom of this page.

I want information on

Civilian personnel guidance.

March 17, 2022

see April 6, 2022 release "Consolidated Department of Defense Coronavirus Disease 2019 Force Health Protection Guidance"

Oct. 4, 2021

May 7, 2021

Nov. 30, 2020

Oct. 27, 2020

Sept. 14, 2020

May 6, 2020

March 30, 2020

March 8, 2020

Defense Industrial Base

April 4, 2022

Updated: see April 4, 2022 Infographic

Feb. 23, 2021

Jan. 14, 2021

March 20, 2020

Elective Surgery

May 21, 2020

May 20, 2020

Supersedes March 24 memo

May 19, 2020

March 24, 2020

Superseded by May 19 memo

Force Health Protection Guidance

Rescinds FHP Revision 5 , dated March 24, 2023

July 26, 2023

Amends Consolidated FHP Guidance – Revision 4 , dated Jan. 30, 2023

Rescinded, see July 26, 2023 USD(P&R) Memo “Force Health Protection Guidance-Coronavirus Disease 2019 and Other Infectious Respiratory Diseases”

March 24, 2023

Accompanying press release, Jan. 31, 2023

Amends Consolidated FHP Guidance - Revision 3 , dated Aug. 29, 2022

Updated, see Consolidated FHP Guidance Revision 5, dated March 24, 2023

Jan. 30, 2023

Amends Consolidated FHP Guidance - Revision 2 , dated Aug. 8, 2022

Updated, see Consolidated FHP Guidance - Revision 4 , dated Jan. 30, 2023

Aug. 29, 2022

Amends Consolidated FHP Guidance-Revision 1 , dated June 29, 2022

Updated, see Consolidated FHP Guidance-Revision 3 , dated Aug. 29, 2022

Aug. 8, 2022

Amends Consolidated FHP Guidance - Revision 1 , dated June 29, 2022

Updated, see Consolidated FHP Guidance - Revision 3 , dated Aug. 29, 2022

Accompanying press release, July 7, 2022

Amends Consolidated FHP Guidance , dated April 4, 2022

Updated, see Consolidated FHP Guidance - Revision 2 , dated Aug. 8, 2022

June 29, 2022

Consolidates, incorporates, and rescinds multiple policies and guidances

Accompanying press release, April 6, 2022

Updated, see Consolidated FHP Guidance - Revision 1 , dated June 29, 2022

Consolidates, incorporates, and rescinds multiple previously issued policies and guidances

Updated: see “Consolidated DoD Coronavirus Disease 2019 Force Health Protection Guidance - Revision 1”, June 29, 2022

April 6, 2022

Department of Defense Guidance for Personnel Traveling During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic

Supplements (Supplement 18) Revision 1

Supplements Secretary of Defense Memorandum

Rescinds and replaces (Supplement 20)

Rescinds and replaces (Supplement 16) Revision 1

Jan. 11, 2022

Department of Defense Guidance for Protecting All Personnel in DOD Workplaces During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Rescinds and replaces (Supplement 18)

Supplemented by (Supplement 20) Revision 1

Jan. 7, 2022

Department of Defense Guidance for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Labratory Testing Services

Rescinds and replaces (Supplement 15) Revision 2

Dec. 30, 2021

Department of Defense Guidance for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination Attestation, Screening Testing, and Vaccination Verification

Rescinds and replaces Supplement 23, Revision 2

Supplemented by 18-1 (Jan. 7, 2022 release)

Dec. 20, 2021

Department of Defense Guidance for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination Attestation, Screening Testing, and Vaccination Verification (Updated)

(corrected copy of Oct. 29 memo )

Rescinded and replaced; see Force Health Protection Guidance Supplement 23, Revision 3

Nov. 15, 2021

(for corrected copy of Oct. 29 memo, see Nov. 15 release )

Rescinded and replaced; see Force Health Protection Supplement 15, Revision 3

Nov. 1, 2021

Rescinded and replaced: see Force Health Protection Guidance Supplement 23, Revision 2

Oct. 18, 2021

Department of Defense Guidance for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination Attestation and Screening Testing for Unvaccinated Personnel

DD Form 3150 (Certification of Vaccination)

Rescinded: see Force Health Protection Guidance Supplement 23, Revision 1

Sept. 7, 2021

Department of Defense Guidance for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Surveillance and Screening Testing

Rescinds Supplement 11

July 21, 2021

Department of Defense Guidance for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Laboratory Testing Services

Rescinds Supplement 15, Revision 1

complemented by Supplement 22

July 2, 2021

Department of Defense Guidance for the Use of Masks, Personal Protective Equipment, and Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic

Rescinds Supplement 17

Supplements Secretary of Defense Feb. 4, 2021 Memorandum, “Use of Masks and Other Public Health Measures”

Supplements Deputy Secretary of Defense May 13, 2021 Memorandum, “Updated Mask Guidelines for Vaccinated Persons”

Rescinded; see March 1, 2022, USD(P&R) memo “Updated Guidance for Mask and Screening Testing for all Department of Defense Installations and Other Facilities”

June 22, 2021

Department of Defense Guidance for Deployment and Redeployment of Individuals and Units During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic

Rescinds and replaces Supplement 16

Rescinded and replaced; see Supplement 20, Revision 1 (Jan. 11, 2022 release)

May 4, 2021

Rescinds and replaces Supplement 14

April 12, 2021

Department of Defense Guidance for Movement and Medical Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Patients, Symptomatic Persons Under Investigation, or Persons Potentially Exposed to the Coronavirus Disease 2019

Rescinds and replaces Supplement 5

March 25, 2021

Department of Defense Guidance for Protecting All Personnel in Department of Defense Workplaces During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic

Rescinds Supplement 8

Rescinded and replaced; see Supplement 18, Revision 1 (Jan. 7, 2022 release)

March 17, 2021

Rescinds and replaces Supplement 7

Rescinded, see Supplement 17, Revision 1

Department of Defense Guidance for Deployment and Redeployment of Individuals and Units during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic

Rescinds Supplement 9

Rescinded; see Supplement 16 - Revision 1

March 16, 2021

Rescinds and replaces Supplement 15

March 15, 2021

Rescinded and replaced; see Supplement 15, Revision-1

Jan. 11, 2021

Supplements requirements in Supplement 8

Rescinds and replaces Supplement 12

Rescinds and replaces Supplement 1

Rescinded and replaced; see Supplement 20

Dec. 29, 2020

Department of Defense Guidance for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Clinical Laboratory Diagnostic Testing Services

Rescinds Supplement 10

Rescinded; see Supplement 15

Aug. 24, 2020

Rescinds Supplement 4

Rescinded; see Supplement 14

Aug. 6, 2020

Department of Defense Guidance for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Surveillance and Screening with Testing

Rescinded; see Supplement 22

June 11, 2020

Rescinds Supplement 6

Rescinded; see Supplement 13

Department of Defense Guidance for Deployment and Redeployment of Individuals and Units During the Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic

Rescinded; see Supplement 16

May 26, 2020

Department of Defense Guidance for Protecting Personnel in Workplaces During the Response to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic

Requirements supplemented in Supplement 14

Rescinded; see Supplement 18

April 13, 2020

Department of Defense Guidance for Use of Cloth Face Coverings, Personal Protective Equipment, and Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic

Rescinds Supplement 3

Rescinded and replaced, see Supplement 17

April 8, 2020

Department of Defense Guidance for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Laboratory Testing Diagnostic Services

Rescinded; see Supplement 10

April 7, 2020

Department of Defense Guidance for Movement and Medical Treatment of COVID-19 Patients, Symptomatic Persons Under Investigation, or Potentially Exposed COVID-19 Persons

Rescinded and replaced; see Supplement 21

Department of Defense Guidance for Personnel Traveling During the Novel Coronavirus Outbreak

Rescinded; see Supplement 12

March 11, 2020

Department of Defense Guidance for the Use of Personal Protective Equipment and Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Outbreak

Rescinded; see Supplement 7

March 10, 2020

Department of Defense Guidance for Military Installation Commanders' Risk-Based Measured Responses to the Novel Coronavirus Outbreak

Rescinded; see April 29, 2021 memo "Guidance for Commanders on Risk-based Responses and Implementation of the Health Protection Condition Framework"

Feb. 25, 2020

Department of Defense Guidance for Personnel Returning from China During the Novel Coronavirus Outbreak

Feb. 7, 2020

Jan. 30, 2020

General Guidance

April 18, 2023

March 1, 2022

Dec 30, 2021

Rescinds May 13, 2021 memo

(additional information: release )

Rescinded; see release March 1, 2022 USD(P&R) memo “Updated Guidance for Mask and Screening Testing for all Department of Defense Installations and Other Facilities”

July 28, 2021

June 10, 2021

June 7, 2021

Supplemented, see June 21, 2021 Force Health Protection Guidance Supplement 17, Revision 1 memo

May 13, 2021

Rescinds April 5, 2020 memo

Updated, see May 13, 2021 memo

Feb. 4, 2021

Dec. 3, 2020

Nov. 19, 2020

July 20, 2020

Rescinded; see Feb. 4, 2021 release and memo

April 5, 2020

Jan. 31, 2020

Health Protection Condition Levels

Rescinds Force Health Protection Supplement 2

Rescinds Secretary of Defense April 1, 2020 memo "Guidance for Commanders on the Implementation of the Risk-Based Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic"

Rescinds Secretary of Defense May 19, 2020 memo "Guidance for Commanders on Risk-Based Changing of Health Protection Condition Levels During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic"

April 29, 2021

Supplements Secretary's April 1 memo "Guidance for Commanders on the Implementation of the Risk-Based Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic"

Rescinded, see April 29, 2021 memo "Guidance for Commanders' Risk-Based Responses and Implementation of the Health Protection Condition Framework"

Military Personnel Guidance

Accompanying press release, Feb. 24, 2023

Feb. 24, 2023

Rescinds Secretary Austin’s Aug. 24, 2021 memo Mandatory Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination of Department of Defense Service Members

Rescinds Secretary Austin’s Nov. 30, 2021 memo Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination for Members of the National Guard and the Ready Reserve

Jan. 10, 2023

Rescinded, see Jan. 10, 2023 release: DOD Rescinds COVID-19 Vaccination Mandate

Nov. 30, 2021

Accompanying press release: Aug. 25, 2021

Aug. 24, 2021

July 1, 2020

June 30, 2020

Cancelled; see March 16, 2021 release (Travel Restrictions)

June 29, 2020

April 23, 2020

April 16, 2020

April 9, 2020

March 26, 2020

March 23, 2020

Moving During COVID-19 (PCS)

Pentagon personnel guidance.

Mar. 3, 2023

(CDC COVID data tracker, Arlington County, VA)

June 17, 2022

Sept. 14, 2022

May 4, 2022

Mar. 2, 2022

Jan. 6, 2022

Dec. 28, 2021

Dec. 27, 2021

Oct. 29, 2021

July 30, 2021

July 7, 2021

Rescinds CMO May 26, 2020 memo, “Pentagon Reservation Plan for Reslience and Aligning with National Guidelines for Opening Up American Again”

June 21, 2021

Nov. 24, 2020

Updates June 25 release

Nov. 20, 2020

Updates June 11 release

June 25, 2020

Updates June 10 memo

Updated; see June 25 release

Updated; see June 25 memo

June 10, 2020

Rescinded, see June 21, 2021 DAM memo

March 14, 2020

March 13, 2020

Secretary of Defense Guidance

Jan 2, 2022

March 4, 2021

May 27, 2020

Supplemented by HPCON memo May 19

Rescinded, see April 29, 2021 memo "Guidance for Commanders’ Risk-Based Responses and Implementation of the Health Protection Condition Framework"

April 1, 2020

March 27, 2020

Test Kits: Military Beneficiaries

Feb 24, 2022

Travel Restrictions

March 30, 2022

March 23, 2022

March 16, 2022

March 9, 2022

March 3, 2022

Feb. 23, 2022

Feb. 16, 2022

Feb. 9, 2022

Feb. 2, 2022

Jan. 26, 2022

Jan. 19, 2022

Jan. 12, 2022

Jan. 5, 2022

Dec. 29, 2021

Dec. 22, 2021

Dec. 15, 2021

Dec. 8, 2021

Dec. 1, 2021

Nov. 24, 2021

Nov. 18, 2021

Nov. 10, 2021

Nov. 3, 2021

Oct. 25, 2021

Oct. 20, 2021

Oct. 13, 2021

Oct. 6, 2021

Sept. 29, 2021

Sept. 22, 2021

Sept. 15, 2021

Sept. 8, 2021

Sept. 1, 2021

August 25, 2021

August 18, 2021

August 11, 2021

August 4, 2021

July 14, 2021

June 30, 2021

June 23, 2021

June 9, 2021

June 2, 2021

May 26, 2021

May 19, 2021

May 12, 2021

May 5, 2021

April 28, 2021

April 21, 2021

April 14, 2021

April 7, 2021

March 31, 2021

March 24, 2021

Supplemented see Force Health Protection (Supplement 20), Revision 1

March 10, 2021

March 3, 2021

Feb. 24, 2021

Feb. 17, 2021

Feb. 10, 2021

Jan. 27, 2021

Jan. 22, 2021

Jan. 6, 2021

Dec. 30, 2020

Dec. 23, 2020

Dec. 16, 2020

Dec. 9, 2020

Dec. 2, 2020

Nov. 25, 2020

Nov. 18, 2020

Nov. 12, 2020

Nov. 4, 2020

Nov. 1, 2020

Oct. 30, 2020

Oct. 21, 2020

Oct. 14, 2020

Oct. 7, 2020

Cancelled; see March 16, 2021 release

Oct. 5, 2020

Oct. 1, 2020

Sept. 23, 2020

Sept. 16, 2020

Sept. 9, 2020

Sept. 2, 2020

Aug. 26, 2020

Aug. 19, 2020

Aug. 12, 2020

Aug. 5, 2020

July 29, 2020

July 23, 2020

July 15, 2020

July 8, 2020

(This format replaces the weekly "Travel Restrictions: Green Locations" releases)

July 2, 2020

June 19, 2020

June 12, 2020

June 8, 2020

May 22, 2020

April 20, 2020

Cancelled; see May 22 memo

Cancelled; see April 20 memo

Vaccine Guidance

Nov. 9, 2021

Rescinds and replaced; see Supplement 23, Revision 3

Rescinded and replaced: see Force Health Protection 23, Supplement 2

Rescinded: see Force Health Protection 23, Supplement 1

August 9, 2021

July 29, 2021

May 20, 2021

Feb. 18, 2021

Updates Dec. 9, 2020 schema

Jan. 19, 2021

Jan. 13, 2021

Dec. 31, 2020

Dec. 11, 2020

Rescinded Jan. 19, 2021

Dec. 7, 2020

Defense.gov

Helpful links.

• Live Events
• Today in DOD
• For the Media
• DOD Resources
• DOD Social Media Policy
• Help Center
• DOD / Military Websites
• Agency Financial Report
• Value of Service
• Taking Care of Our People
• FY 2025 Defense Budget
• National Defense Strategy

The Department of Defense provides the military forces needed to deter war and ensure our nation's security.

US wants airlines to boost travel benefits for military personnel

• Medium Text

Make sense of the latest ESG trends affecting companies and governments with the Reuters Sustainable Switch newsletter. Sign up here.

Reporting by David Shepardson; Editing by Stephen Coates and Sonali Paul

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles. New Tab , opens new tab

Arielle Zuckerberg, younger sister of Meta chief Mark Zuckerberg, has invested in French space technology company Dark via her venture capital firm Long Journey, the latest instance of a surge in funding for companies in the space sector.

Business Chevron

China's Q1 GDP grows 5.3% y/y, well above forecast

China's economy grew 5.3% in the first quarter year-on-year, official data showed on Tuesday, comfortably beating analysts' expectations, a welcome sign for policymakers as they try to shore up demand and confidence in the face of a protracted property crisis.

• Cover Letters
• Jobs I've Applied To
• Saved Searches
• Subscriptions
• Marine Corps
• Coast Guard
• Space Force
• Military Podcasts
• Benefits Home
• Military Pay and Money
• Veteran Health Care
• VA eBenefits
• Veteran Job Search
• Military Skills Translator
• Upload Your Resume
• Veteran Employment Project
• Vet Friendly Employers
• Career Advice
• Military Life Home
• Military Trivia Game
• Veterans Day
• Spouse & Family
• Military History
• Discounts Home
• Featured Discounts
• Veterans Day Restaurant Discounts
• Electronics
• Join the Military Home
• Contact a Recruiter
• Military Fitness

Travel Advisories

Looking for important information before you travel? We're here to help:

Before you travel abroad

Be sure to check the State Department site for updated information on:

• Travel Advisories for countries around the world
• No-Fee Regular Passports for Diplomatic, Official, Military Dependents, Peace Corps and others traveling on official government business

Also be sure to check the The Centers for Disease Control site for updated information for travelers, including updates on:

• Vaccinations required or recommended for the countries you plan to visit
• Outbreaks of diseases that could affect your travel plans

You May Also Like

The Armed Forces Vacation Club offers affordable condominium rentals at resorts around the world on a space available basis.

Military bases worldwide are home to some truly memorable vacation spots, camping areas and affordable lodging.

Who is eligible to travel Space A? We have all the info here!

Here are some of the most common Space A questions and their answers.

• Entertainment
• Military Equipment
• Outdoor Guide

Select Service

• National Guard

Popular Discounts Articles

The program offers free admission to active-duty, National Guard and Reserve military personnel and their families.

Admission fees at zoos can be costly. So we've put together a list of zoos around the country that offer military discounts.

For the Month of the Military Child, we've gathered a list of nine discounts that military families can take advantage of.

Major League Baseball teams are showing their appreciation for service members with military discounts on game tickets.

Amusement parks are a fun way for families to spend time together and many offer military discounts.

Benefits for members of the U.S. military

United would like to extend our sincere thank you to members of our U.S. military for everything they do for us, and we would like to do everything we can to make your travel with us as easy and comfortable as possible.

We are pleased to offer a variety of benefits to active-duty military members, including those who have been discharged from the military within 7 days of the date of travel. These benefits are available to members of the U.S. Army ® , U.S. Navy, U.S. Air Force, U.S. Marines, U.S. Space Force, U.S. Coast Guard and National Guard, and cadets of the Air Force Academy, West Point, Naval Academy, Merchant Marine Academy, Coast Guard Academy, and Commissioned Officers Corps of the U.S. Public Health and NOAA.

For U.S. military members traveling on PCS orders with pets, different rules apply. Find more information about military travel with pets here.

Baggage acceptance allowance

Wesalute+ discount, military and state department pet exceptions.

United allows active duty U.S. military personnel on Permanent Change of Station (PCS) and their spouses, along with State Department Foreign Service Personnel (FSP) and their spouses to transport their pet dogs and cats when traveling on assignment to and from international destinations. Visit the Military and State Department pet exceptions page to learn more about our PetSafe ® program.

United Club invitation

We are pleased to invite active duty military members in uniform or with present leave orders or rest and recuperation papers to visit our United Club℠ locations on the same day they are traveling on a United- or United Express ® -operated departing flight. Please present your military ID, your boarding pass and sponsoring documentation for entry. Access is available to active duty military members and family members with gate passes or traveling on the same flight as the military member and is subject to each location’s capacity and seating availability. For more information about our United Club locations, please see the Club and Lounge Access page.

Restricted Countries: Where Military Personnel Can't Travel

• Last updated Oct 08, 2023
• Difficulty Intemediate

• Category United States

When it comes to military travel, certain countries are off-limits or heavily restricted due to security concerns, political tensions, or ongoing conflicts. These restricted countries pose unique challenges for military personnel, as they often require specialized authorization, strict security precautions, and extensive planning. From North Korea and Iran to Syria and Somalia, exploring the restrictions placed on military travel offers a glimpse into the complex geopolitical landscape that surrounds these nations and the potential risk military personnel face when venturing into these areas.

What You'll Learn

What are some examples of restricted countries for military travel, what criteria are used to determine which countries are deemed restricted for military travel, are there any exceptions or special considerations for military personnel traveling to restricted countries, what are the potential consequences for military personnel who travel to restricted countries without authorization, how often are the restrictions on military travel to certain countries reviewed or reassessed.

Military travel is an essential part of an armed forces' operations, whether it be for training exercises, operational deployments, or joint military exercises with partner nations. However, certain countries may be restricted for military travel due to various reasons, such as political tensions, security concerns, or diplomatic issues. In this article, we will explore some examples of restricted countries for military travel and the reasons behind these restrictions.

One example of a restricted country for military travel is North Korea. The reclusive nation has long been at odds with the international community due to its nuclear weapons program and provocative actions. As a result, most countries have imposed strict travel restrictions on their military personnel when it comes to visiting or conducting operations in North Korea. This is primarily due to concerns about the safety and security of military personnel, as well as the potential for escalating tensions in the region.

Another example is Syria. The ongoing civil war and the presence of numerous armed groups and terrorist organizations have made Syria a dangerous destination for military travel. Many countries have banned their military personnel from traveling to Syria or participating in any military operations within its territory. The unstable security situation and the risk of being targeted by insurgent groups are the primary reasons behind these restrictions.

Iran is another country that is often restricted for military travel. The tense relationship between Iran and many Western nations, as well as its support for various militant groups in the region, have led to travel restrictions for military personnel. Concerns about the safety and security of military personnel, as well as the potential for escalating conflicts, are the main factors behind these restrictions.

Pakistan is also a country that is often restricted for military travel. The volatile security situation in the country, especially in the border regions with Afghanistan, makes it a challenging environment for military operations. Concerns about the presence of extremist groups and the risk of attacks against military personnel have led many countries to restrict travel to Pakistan.

Furthermore, travel restrictions for military personnel can also be imposed on countries facing internal conflicts or political instability. This includes countries like Yemen, Iraq, and Afghanistan. The presence of insurgent groups, terrorist organizations, and ongoing conflicts makes these countries dangerous for military travel. The safety and security of military personnel are of paramount importance, and restrictions are imposed to mitigate risks and protect them from harm.

In conclusion, there are several examples of countries that are restricted for military travel due to various reasons. Political tensions, security concerns, and the presence of extremist groups or ongoing conflicts are some of the factors behind these restrictions. It is essential for military authorities to carefully assess the risks and make informed decisions to ensure the safety and security of their personnel during travel.

The Essential Guide to Costa Rica Travel Restrictions and Insurance

You may want to see also

There are a number of criteria that are used to determine which countries are deemed restricted for military travel. These criteria typically include factors such as the current political situation, armed conflict, and security threats that may endanger military personnel.

One of the key criteria used is the current political situation in the country. If there is political instability or unrest, it may not be safe for military personnel to travel to that country. This could include situations such as ongoing protests, civil wars, or regime changes. Military officials will closely monitor the political situation in these countries and make decisions based on the level of risk involved.

Another important criteria is the presence of armed conflict. If a country is currently engaged in a war or is experiencing widespread violence, it is often considered too risky for military travel. This could include countries that are currently fighting insurgencies, experiencing religious or ethnic conflict, or have ongoing territorial disputes. Military officials will assess the level of violence in these countries and determine whether it is safe for personnel to travel there.

Security threats are also taken into consideration when determining which countries are restricted for military travel. This can include factors such as the presence of terrorist groups, high crime rates, or the risk of kidnapping or attacks on military personnel. Military officials will gather intelligence on the security situation in these countries and use this information to make informed decisions.

In addition to these factors, military officials may also consider the availability of medical facilities and support services in the country. If a country does not have adequate medical resources to support military personnel in case of injury or illness, it may be deemed too risky for travel.

It is important to note that the criteria used to determine restricted countries for military travel may vary depending on the specific military branch or organization. Different countries and military organizations may have different policies and procedures in place for determining which countries are restricted for travel.

To illustrate these criteria, let's consider the example of a hypothetical country, Country X. Country X is currently experiencing political instability due to protests against the government. There are reports of violence and clashes between protesters and security forces. Additionally, there have been recent terrorist attacks in the country carried out by an extremist group. Based on these factors, military officials may determine that Country X is too risky for military travel and impose travel restrictions.

In summary, the criteria used to determine which countries are deemed restricted for military travel typically include factors such as the current political situation, armed conflict, security threats, and the availability of medical facilities. These criteria are used to ensure the safety and security of military personnel and to mitigate risks that may arise from traveling to certain countries.

How Many Countries Have Travel Restrictions in Place?

When it comes to travel restrictions for military personnel, there are often exceptions and special considerations that need to be taken into account. These exceptions are put in place to ensure the safety and security of military personnel and to align with national security policies. Here are some key factors to consider when military personnel are traveling to restricted countries.

• Official Travel: Military personnel who are traveling to restricted countries for official duties often have different rules and guidelines compared to civilians. This is because they are representing their country and have a specific purpose for their travel. They may need to obtain specific clearances, visas, or permissions from higher authorities before traveling. Furthermore, they may also receive training or briefings on the country's political situation, potential threats, and cultural sensitivities before their departure.
• Security Measures: Military personnel are often subjected to more rigorous security measures compared to civilians when traveling to restricted countries. This includes additional screenings, background checks, and access to classified information. These measures are in place to minimize risks and protect sensitive military operations and personnel.
• Exemptions: In certain situations, military personnel may be exempted from certain travel restrictions that apply to civilians. This could be due to the nature of their work or the strategic importance of their assignment. However, these exemptions are usually rare and are granted on a case-by-case basis. Military personnel still need to adhere to strict protocols and follow necessary safety guidelines to ensure their own security.
• Assistance and Support: Military personnel traveling to restricted countries often have access to assistance and support networks that are not available to regular travelers. This can include embassy or consulate services, military liaison officers, or specialized security teams. These resources are meant to provide guidance, safety information, and help in case of emergencies.
• Training and Awareness: Military personnel receive extensive training and education on travel security and risk management. They are often better equipped to assess potential threats and navigate challenging situations in restricted countries. This training helps them make informed decisions and take necessary precautions to ensure their own safety and the success of their mission.

It's important to note that military personnel traveling to restricted countries still need to adhere to local laws and regulations. They must respect the host nation's customs, traditions, and cultural sensitivities. Inappropriate behavior or disregard for local laws can have serious consequences and jeopardize the mission and the reputation of the military.

In conclusion, military personnel traveling to restricted countries have a unique set of considerations and exceptions compared to civilians. These exceptions are in place to ensure their safety, security, and the success of their mission. They undergo specialized training, receive additional security measures, and have access to support networks that regular travelers do not have. By following protocols, adhering to local laws, and staying informed, military personnel can mitigate risks and successfully fulfill their official duties in restricted countries.

Exploring Fiji: Current Travel Restrictions and Guidelines

Military personnel are subject to strict guidelines and regulations when it comes to travel, especially when it involves visiting restricted countries. These restrictions are in place for a variety of reasons, including national security concerns, diplomatic relations, and potential dangers to the individuals themselves. In this article, we will discuss the potential consequences for military personnel who travel to restricted countries without proper authorization.

One of the most immediate consequences for military personnel who travel to restricted countries without authorization is the potential violation of military regulations. Each branch of the military has its own set of rules and policies regarding travel, and traveling to a restricted country without authorization is likely to be in direct violation of these rules. This can lead to disciplinary action, including reprimands, loss of pay, reduction in rank, and even discharge from the military.

National security concerns also play a significant role in the restriction of travel to certain countries. These countries are often identified as having high levels of terrorism, political instability, or hostile relations with the United States or its allies. By traveling to these countries without authorization, military personnel may inadvertently expose sensitive information or compromise national security efforts. This can result in serious consequences, both for the individual and for the overall security of the country.

Diplomatic implications are also a concern when it comes to travel to restricted countries. The United States maintains relationships with countries around the world, and traveling to a restricted country without proper authorization can strain these relationships. This can undermine diplomatic efforts and potentially harm the overall reputation and credibility of the United States in the international arena.

In addition to the potential career and national security consequences, there are also significant personal risks involved in traveling to restricted countries without proper authorization. These countries may have high levels of violence, civil unrest, or even ongoing warfare. Military personnel may find themselves in dangerous situations with limited access to support or resources. They may also face legal challenges, as their actions can be viewed as illegal or suspicious by local authorities.

To illustrate the potential consequences of unauthorized travel to restricted countries, let's consider a hypothetical scenario. Imagine a military servicemember who decides to travel to a country known for its political instability and terrorist activities without obtaining proper authorization. During their visit, they unknowingly come into contact with individuals affiliated with a terrorist organization and inadvertently provide information that compromises ongoing intelligence operations. This information leads to a significant security breach and places the lives of other military personnel and civilians at risk. As a result, the individual responsible faces severe disciplinary action, including a court-martial, dishonorable discharge, and potential criminal charges.

In conclusion, the potential consequences for military personnel who travel to restricted countries without proper authorization are significant. Violating military regulations, compromising national security efforts, straining diplomatic relationships, and exposing oneself to personal risks are just some of the potential outcomes. It is vital for military personnel to understand and adhere to the guidelines and regulations in place to ensure the safety and security of themselves, their colleagues, and their country.

Navigating Medford Oregon Travel Restrictions: A Guide for Visitors

Military travel to certain countries is a complex issue that involves national security, political considerations, and strategic planning. As a result, the restrictions on military travel are regularly reviewed and reassessed to ensure the safety and well-being of military personnel and to protect national interests.

The frequency at which these restrictions are reviewed or reassessed varies depending on the specific country in question and the geopolitical situation at the time. In general, however, such reviews are conducted on a regular basis, often taking place annually or biannually.

One of the main reasons for such regular reviews is the constantly evolving nature of global politics. The security situation in certain countries can change rapidly, and it is essential that the military has up-to-date information and analysis on potential threats and risks. By regularly reassessing travel restrictions, military leaders can make informed decisions and adjust their travel policies accordingly.

Another reason for conducting frequent reviews is the need to balance national security concerns with diplomatic relations and alliances. The military must maintain strong relationships with partner nations and work collaboratively on various initiatives. Therefore, regular reviews help ensure that travel restrictions are in line with foreign policy objectives and do not undermine international partnerships.

The process of reviewing and reassessing travel restrictions typically involves a comprehensive analysis of various factors. The military intelligence and security agencies play a significant role in providing information on the security situation in specific regions. The analysis considers factors such as terrorist activities, political instability, civil unrest, and the presence of hostile forces. These factors are evaluated in conjunction with diplomatic relations, economic interests, and ongoing military operations to paint a holistic picture of the risks involved.

Once the analysis is complete, military leaders and policymakers review the findings and make decisions on whether to maintain, modify, or lift travel restrictions. This decision-making process involves weighing the risks against the potential benefits of military travel to a particular country. It also takes into account the available resources and capabilities to mitigate the identified risks.

It's important to note that the decision to restrict military travel is not taken lightly. The military values the well-being and safety of its personnel above all else. Therefore, it is in the best interest of the military to regularly review and reassess travel restrictions to ensure that they remain effective in protecting its personnel and national security.

In conclusion, the restrictions on military travel to certain countries are regularly reviewed and reassessed. This process takes into account the dynamic nature of global politics, the need to balance national security concerns with international relations, and the comprehensive analysis of various factors. By conducting regular reviews, the military can make informed decisions and adjust its travel policies to ensure the safety and well-being of its personnel.

Understanding the Travel Restrictions Associated with the J1 Waiver Program

Frequently asked questions.

Restricted countries for military travel are nations where travel is restricted or prohibited for members of the military due to safety concerns, political unrest, or conflicts. These countries are flagged as high-risk destinations and are usually off-limits to military personnel.

The determination of restricted countries for military travel is typically done by the leadership of the military branch or the Department of Defense. They analyze factors such as the current security situation, threat levels, and recommendations from intelligence agencies before designating a country as restricted for military travel.

Traveling to a restricted country as a member of the military can have serious consequences, including disciplinary action, legal repercussions, and potential harm to personal safety. Military personnel who violate travel restrictions can face administrative sanctions, loss of security clearances, or even criminal charges if they knowingly and willfully disregard the regulations.

In certain cases, military personnel may be granted waivers to travel to restricted countries. These waivers are typically granted only for essential missions or official duty, and strict approval processes are in place to evaluate the necessity and safety of such travel. Waivers for personal travel or tourism purposes are rare and highly unlikely to be granted.

• Arjun Yadav Author Editor Reviewer

• Karli Trujillo Author Editor Reviewer

It is awesome. Thank you for your feedback!

We are sorry. Plesae let us know what went wrong?

We will update our content. Thank you for your feedback!

Leave a comment

United states photos, related posts.

Essential Packing List for Exploring Eastern Europe in April

• Jan 06, 2024

14 Fun Things to Do in Wetumpka, AL

• May 07, 2023

12 Free Activities to Experience in Mesa

• May 15, 2023

12 Must-Do Activities in Crystal Beach, Florida

10 Must-Do Activities in Kalibo for an Unforgettable Experience

• Jun 04, 2023

10 Unforgettable Activities to Experience at Moon Palace Cancun

• May 22, 2023

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock A locked padlock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

TSA partnered with Stars and Stripes News for special military guide

The special guide for service members and their families includes travel tips, such as how to prepare, pack and declare a firearm, checkpoint dos and don’ts, and an inside look at some of TSA’s programs and employees, with a special military emphasis.

Middle East latest: UN nuclear watchdog 'concerned' Israel could target Iranian nuclear facilities in revenge attack

Israel says "we reserve the right to do everything in our power" after Benjamin Netanyahu's war cabinet meets to discuss how to respond to Iran's attack. But the UN's nuclear watchdog says it is worried Israel could target Iran's nuclear facilities.

Tuesday 16 April 2024 02:40, UK

• Israel-Hamas war
• Big picture: All you need to know about Middle East crisis after Iranian attack
• UN nuclear watchdog 'concerned' Israel could target Iranian nuclear facilities
• Israel 'wants to carry out action against Iran coordinated with United States'
• Israeli soldiers wounded in explosion 'after crossing border into Lebanon'
• What Israel could do now and what its allies are saying: Here's the latest from our experts
• Alistair Bunkall analysis: Cameron not shy in message to Israel, but will they listen?
• Middle East 'is on the brink', UN chief warns
• Michael Clarke analysis: How all Israel's options for responding to Iran attack come with complications
• Podcast:  What happens next?

Iran's foreign minister has told his Chinese counterpart that Iran is willing to exercise restraint and has no intention of escalating the situation in the Middle East, according to Xinhua.

The Chinese state news outlet reported that Wang Li and Hossein Amir-Abdollahian spoke late on Monday about the regional tensions.

Mr Amir-Abdollahian said the UN Security Council did not respond strongly enough to Israel's attack on Iran's embassy building in Damascus and that Iran had the right to defend itself.

Mr Wang said China strongly condemned the attack on the Iranian diplomatic post, regarding it as a serious violation of international law.

"It is believed that Iran can handle the situation well and spare the region further turmoil while safeguarding its own sovereignty and dignity," he said in comments reported by Xinhua.

Iraq's prime minister Mohammed Shia al Sudani has joined calls for restraint in the Middle East.

He was speaking during a visit to the US for talks with various leaders, including Joe Biden, on Monday.

"In the spirit of partnership our views may be divergent about what’s happening in the region," Mr Sudani said through a translator as he sat next to Mr Biden in the Oval Office.

"But we agree certainly about the international law, the international humanitarian law and the responsibility to protect and the law of war, and we reject any repression against the civilians, especially women and children, and we encourage the commitment about respecting international norms and diplomatic missions."

Deputy Prime Minister Muhammad Ali Tamim, who co-chaired a meeting of the US-Iraq Higher Coordinating Committee with US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, said Iraq was concerned about its region being "dragged into a wider war that will threaten international security and safety".

Iraq's own situation was also discussed - the US has welcomed Mr Sudani's economic reform plans but the influence of Iran-backed groups still raises concerns.

The US has 2,500 troops in Iraq helping local forces to prevent a return of Islamic State, which seized large parts of Iraq and Syria in 2014 before being defeated.

The United Nations nuclear watchdog chief says he is worried Israel could target Iranian nuclear facilities.

Israel's military chief said on Monday that his country will respond to last weekend's missile and drone attack by Iran, which was launched in retaliation for a suspected Israeli strike on Iran's embassy compound in Syria.

International Atomic Energy Agency Director General Rafael Grossi said Iran closed its nuclear facilities on Sunday over "security considerations".

They reopened on Monday but IAEA inspectors were kept away "until we see that the situation is completely calm".

"We are going to resume tomorrow," Mr Grossi said on Monday.

"This has not had an impact on our inspection activity."

When asked about the possibility of an Israeli strike on Iranian nuclear facilities, he said: "We are always concerned about this possibility."

He urged "extreme restraint".

The IAEA regularly inspects Iran's main nuclear facilities - Iran says its nuclear programme is peaceful but Western countries say Tehran is trying to make nuclear bombs.

Italy, which holds the rotating presidency of the G7, is open to new sanctions against individuals engaged against Israel following the Iranian drone and missile attack, its foreign minister has said. 

"If we need to have more sanctions for people clearly engaged against Israel, supporting for example terrorism, supporting Hamas, it is possible to do it," Antonio Tajani told reporters.

"But we need to be very serious and to work all together."

G7 leaders have unanimously condemned Iran's attack on Israel and urged "restraint" on all sides to avoid the situation in the region escalating any further.

They spoke as part of an extraordinary meeting convened by Italy's Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni in the wake of the unprecedented attacks.

Exiled Crown Prince of Iran Reza Pahlavi has said the Iranian regime is "becoming weaker and weaker and [more] desperate by the minute". 

He told Sky's World With Yalda Hakim programme that "repression at home and aggression abroad is part and parcel of the [regime's] basic strategy". 

Mr Pahlavi said Iran spread propaganda after the attack on Israel to satisfy its base "but to the detriment of a nation that are the first victims of this regime". 

He argued that billions of dollars worth of weapons were "wasted" while Iranians are queuing for food, and that the regime "doesn't spend a dime on the needs of our society". 

"Iranians do not at all stand for what this regime stands for," he said.

Mr Pahlavi said the "ultimate solution" is for the regime to be ended and for the Iranian people to win freedom.

He calls on world leaders and decision makers to discuss the issue "seriously", saying they should invest in the "alternative to this regime". 

Two Palestinians have been killed today in the occupied West Bank province of Nablus, a local mayor has said. 

"About 50 settlers, a large number of them armed, attacked the residents of Khirbet al Tawil village east of Aqraba in the province of Nablus," said mayor Salah Bani Jaber. 

"They opened fire on the youth and this led to the death of two of the youth and the injury of others." 

The IDF earlier said its forces had killed a 17-year-old during a raid in Nablus. 

A spokesperson for Israel's Border Police said undercover border police troops, together with the Israeli army, launched an operation in the city of Nablus to arrest a suspect.

During the operation, riots broke out in which one person threw an explosive device at the troops and was shot dead by the undercover unit, the spokesperson said. 

By Dominic Waghorn, international affairs editor

Take the win, or strike back?

The question exercising Israeli minds in the wake of Iran's missile onslaught and the focus of intense debate here. The outcome will decide the immediate fate of this region. A return to shadow war, or all out escalation into something much more serious.

Joe Biden and other allies says Israel should bank a number of wins: Israel's military success repelling Iran's ballistic onslaught and its assassination of several high level Iranians in the Damascus consulate on 1 April blamed on Israel that precipitated Iran's retaliation.

And in the Israeli media there are others making a bigger point.  Ever since 7 October the steady process of rapprochement between Israel and former Arab allies has been in doubt.  Saturday night showed it's alive and well.

We don't know the details but a number of Arab states helped Israel either shoot down Iran's missiles or let in Israeli jets to do so.

There are passionate arguments being made here that that coalition effort is a template for the future. Its proponents argue Israel should build on the unprecedented cooperation from former enemies not jeopardise it.

But the hawks reject that.

"When a bully tries to hit you 350 times and only succeeds seven times, you've NOT won," tweeted former prime minister Naftali Bennett in a long screed calling for immediate action against Iran.

Many here can't accept that Israel is safer because it was helped on one night to avert a well telegraphed threat that took hours to reach Israel. They say Iran must be deterred from ever trying to do the same again.

"How DO you deter?" Mr Bennett asks. "By exacting a deeply painful price."

So while Rishi Sunak, Keir Starmer and Joe Biden all say restraint is in Israel's best interests, many here are not convinced. Israelis are wary of outsourcing their security to others. The history of the Jewish people has shown tragically where that has failed in the past.

So while the world fears any Israeli retaliation that could plunge the region into a deepening and widening conflict, some in Israel say its long term security requires immediate action that could risk doing just that.

Reports suggest the hawks are prevailing in government. It is not a question of if Israel will retaliate, more when and what.

The hope would be for a goldilocks option, not so hot it risks all out regional war, but also not so cold it fails to land a punch deterring Iran from doing the same again.

Not easy in this volatile region.

Iranians have gathered in Tehran to celebrate their country's attack on Israel last weekend. 

Iran launched more than 330 drones and missiles at its rival in retaliation for an attack on its consulate in Syria. 

Israel has delayed its plans to move ahead with a ground offensive on Rafah after it was subjected to an unprecedented Iranian rocket attack over the weekend, according to reports.

The Jewish state's air force was set to begin dropping leaflets on parts of Gaza's southernmost city, however those plans were paused, according to CNN citing Israeli sources.

Heated debate was reportedly sparked in Benjamin Netanyahu's war cabinet over how to respond to Tehran's attack on Saturday night.

Disagreement between members seems to be over the speed and the degree of the response, with all determined to retaliate, but disagreeing on the particulars.

Among the options that are being considered is a strike on an Iranian facility that would send a message, but would avoid causing casualties, according to one Israeli official.

International pressure on the Israeli government to de-escalate the already dangerous situation in the region, is also said to be playing a part in deciding the severity of the response.

Israel's allies have branded Iran's attack a failure, saying it didn't manage to hit its intended targets. 

The White House hit out at suggestions Iran had purposefully failed, and said Tehran had intended to cause serious destruction. 

Our security and defence analyst Professor Michael Clarke takes us through... 

Be the first to get Breaking News

Install the Sky News app for free

• Middle East News

Travel curbs on US personnel in Israel, top general in Tel Aviv

Visual Stories

US wants airlines to boost travel benefits for military personnel

W ASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg on Thursday urged the nation's largest passenger airlines to improve travel benefits for active-duty military personnel and their families.

The department in May plans to begin posting comparative information on travel benefits that airlines guarantee for service members and their families on a customer service dashboard.

The department plans to detail airlines that will commit to full refunds to service members and their families who cancel travel plans due to military directives as well as allowances for free baggage. 

(Reporting by David Shepardson; Editing by Chris Reese)