trek 4900 disc 2011

• Crosscountry
• Rider Notes

2011 Trek 4900 Disc

A 26″ aluminum frame crosscountry bike with upper mid-range components.

For This Bike

View more similar bikes →

A bike with lower gearing will be easier to ride up steep hills, while a higher top end means it will pedal faster down hills.

Similar Bikes

(descending)

Add custom gearing

Last updated 29 June Not listed for 2,466 days

Accessories

Is The Trek 4900 Disc A Good Mountain Bike? [Trek 4900 Review]

Table of Contents

The Trek 4900 is a hard model to find in Trek stores these days, but it debuted in 2003 as a former mid-range mountain bike that many riders who like to ride rough really like. (This is the most up-to-date information I could find on this bike.)

It was upgraded to the most recent version in 2013, and then gradually phased out. This is a comprehensive review of the Trek 4900 Disc, which was released in 2012.

The 2012 Trek 4900 Disc’s descent and climbing performance, key features, components, and specifications, as well as other versions in the series, are all broken down below.

So, welcome to the Best Bike Select blog, and let’s get started right away.

The Trek 4900 disc is a mid-range mountain bike, so there are more possibilities when it comes to mountain riding, and it has more upgrades than the 2003 low-end version of the Trek 4900. If you’re a rider familiar with mountain riding, then you’ll love its configuration.

The biggest source of hardtail mountain bike damping on a descending road is the shock fork. Obviously, the Trek 4900 disc fits the bill with the Suntour SF9- XCR, 100mm travel.

Despite being an entry-level trail shock fork, the SR Suntour fork performs admirably on rough trails and is extremely difficult to bottom out. When descending quickly over constantly undulating terrain, it also doesn’t feel like there are too many bumps.

On top of that, the Trek 4900 disc has nimble handling, even with the stopping hydraulic brakes, which can stop quickly on large rocky slabs that you don’t feel confident passing. Of course, my complaint is that the tires, which are only 2.1″ wide, respond quickly to the ride, but the descent speed is significantly slower on loose ground.

For every happy descent, there is always a strenuous climb. the Trek 4900 disc has a 3X10 drivetrain and there are not too many obstacles when riding comfortably on climbs, but of course you want fast climbs to be very hard.

The 26 “x2.1” tires provide amazing traction when we are riding on hills that are not steep. the 3X10 drivetrain provides a wide range of gearing without straining to climb. If you’re on city streets, or mountain parks, in manicured terrain, the Trek 4900 disc will have a lot of room to play with, a feature that mid-range mountain bikes basically have.

However, I prefer the Trek 4900 disc’s ability to provide a remote locking fork that translates well to the power of your pedaling when climbing pavement, despite the fact that it is not as easily accessible.

However, it is a fairly uncommon setup among mountain bikes costing more than $1000. The somewhat aggressive geometry angle is also a great climbing tool, and while I personally believe that when climbing fast, it is more dependent on body weight and tire grip, the impact of the body geometry still allows you to climb steep uphill climbs. (On dry land.) So I don’t have much to complain about when it comes to the Trek 4900 disc’s climbing ability.

General Road Riding

The Trek 4900 disc’s versatility allows it to perform even better on rough trails. To accommodate more difficult terrain, a variety of gears are available. Smaller 26″ tires with very flexible steering are also available.

Because of the short downhill surface, it can dance comfortably in the winding trails once more. Fast braking and dexterity are not limited to impactful terrain, but are more enjoyable for the rider when riding on boring flat roads.

The rear seat is reserved for rack and fender mounting holes, and with them installed, it can be transformed into a commuter bike in an instant. Perhaps the adventurer, a mountain bike that many commuter riders enjoy, is the resting daily.

Main Features

Alpha gold aluminum frame (4.5/5).

The Trek 4900 disc is built with an Alpha Gold aluminum frame and Trek’s semi-integrated head tube, which is used in almost all of the company’s mid-to high-end models. The typical mountain bike frame design is still conservative. The color scheme of black, white, and red is more dynamic.

A young mountain biker would prefer a paint color with some personality. The body weight is low due to the lightweight and welded flat aluminum body. It is strong and durable, as well as easy to maintain, and was the most commonly used frame material in mid-range models at the time.

The Trek 4900’s head tube angle of 70.5 degrees balances comfort and aggressive riding, making it even more versatile.

Front Fork (4.5/5)

Fork travel on the Suntour SF9- XCR is 100mm. With this setup, they are more than adequate for riding on flat roads. On strenuous mountain rides, it is also extremely difficult to bottom out.

It also has a remote lockout, which means the fork can be removed for flat road riding, allowing you to get to your destination much faster. The not-too-soft, not-too-hard shock fork also provides a lot of fun on long rides. The fork can also be manually adjusted for the number of strokes, allowing riders with varying riding styles to adapt to more difficult terrain.

Shimano 3X10 drivetrain (4.0/5)

The Shimano HG62-10, a 10-speed configuration in the mid-range, is now more commonly used in bikes with 1X drivetrains. There is no shortage of mountain bikes over $2,000 in various configurations in this area.

The Shimano M522 is the most commonly used, with a minimum of 24 gears and a 32-tooth flywheel in the middle. The change in terrain is given more thought. As a result, the rear chainstay offers a wide range of gears. As a result, the Trek 4900 drivetrain is not suitable for a beginner’s mountain bike.

Bontrager XR2 Tires (3.5/5)

The tires will almost always be Bontrager, as with the Trek 4 series of mountain bikes released in 2012. It’s not of high quality, but the narrow tires make technical mountain riding difficult.

However, the Trek 4900 disc can accommodate tires up to 2.3 inches in diameter “large 26 “Tires may appear dated now, but they are more common on low-cost mountain bikes or youth mountain bikes these days. For a more enjoyable ride in the mountains, I prefer 27.5″ or 29” mountain tires.

Hydraulic disc brakes (4.5/5)

The Hydraulic disc brakes on the Trek 4900 disc are one of the best buys. Hydraulic disc brakes mean less maintenance and greater longevity as a daily commuter. It is not an exaggeration to say that you can have all of your body parts replaced and still have your brakes work. I have nothing but praise for the Trek 4900 disc’s Hydraulic disc brakes.

Slightly ascendable handlebars (4.0/5)

The Bontrager Low Riser OS handlebars have a 9-degree sweep, which allows riders to ride in a more comfortable position. It also compensates for the steeper head tube angle. The handlebar can be raised by 15mm to accommodate riders of varying proportional heights.

Other versions of the Trek 4900

The 2003 Trek 4900 has many of the same features as the Trek 4900 disc 2012. But the Trek 4900 disc has some features that put it in the mid-range mountain bike category. The Trek 4900, on the other hand, is relatively spartan with alloy cable pull brakes, a 3X9 drivetrain, and a RockShox Pilot C fork with 80mm of travel. No more remote lockout. Only suitable for normal mountain terrain.

Benefits of the Trek 4900

• Lightweight aluminum frame with head tube angle for mid-range riders
• Suntour SF9- XCR fork for trail riding
• 3X10 drivetrain with a wide range of gears
• Hydraulic disc brakes are not present for precise braking and easy maintenance
• Slightly ascendable handlebars for a more comfortable riding position

What we don’t like about it

• 2.1″ tires are flexible enough, but reduce some of the grip

Trek 4900 Specs

• What is the body weight of the Trek 4900?

The overall body weight is approximately 31.5 lbs.

• What frame sizes are available for the Trek 4900 disc?

13, 16, 18, 19.5, 21, 22.5″

• What is the Trek Alpha 4900 mountain bike price?

The 2003 Trek 4900 is estimated to be worth $50, while the 2012 Trek 4900 disc is estimated to be worth $130. If you are willing to wait and the bike is in good condition, you can increase the bid on the used trading platform by 50% and wait for a buyer.

Learn more: Is The Trek 4300 A Good Mountain Bike? [Trek 4300 Review]

Comparison table

Trek roscoe 7 mountain bike vs trek 4900 disc.

The Trek Roscoe 7 mountain bike, which is also part of Trek’s mid-range mountain bikes, has a lot of upgrades compared to the Trek 4900 disc. You get clean internal alignment, 29″ fast-rolling tires (27.5″ tires on the XS frame), 2.6″ extra-wide tires for more grip, 1X12 race-grade drivetrain, 140mm RockShox Recon Silver RL shock fork, and a lighter bodyweight.

The Trek Roscoe 7 mountain bike is a great fit if you want an affordable, entry-level trail racing mountain bike. The price is $500 more than the Trek 4900 disc, but the experience is enhanced with the Trek Roscoe 7 mountain bike’s performance on both climbs and descents.

29″ big tires for fast rolling over roots and gravel. The somewhat exaggerated 2.6″ wide tires provide a strong grip on mountain turns and steep mountain climbs.

Last but not least are its vacuum tires, which are lighter on the wheels without the binding of an inner tube, and increase responsiveness by at least 15%. It has the same Alpha Gold aluminum frame as the Trek 4900 disc. But the drivetrain, while less than the Trek 4900 disc, is much less difficult to ride. So the Trek Roscoe 7 mountain bike is the mountain bike that can rough it up off-road.

Learn more: Is Trek Roscoe 7 Worth Buying? [Trek Roscoe 7 Review]

Trek Marlin 8 mountain bike VS Trek 4900 disc

The price of the Trek Marlin 8 is almost the same as Trek 4900 disc. The Trek Marlin 8 is equipped with a 1X12 drivetrain with a wide range of gearing that won’t overwhelm newbies. The Trek Marlin 8 is a great value for money mountain bike at a great price, but maintains many of the same accessories as a high-end race bike. It retains a minimum 26″ responsive small tire (XXS frame).

Also available in 27.5-29″ tire sizes, it’s the mountain bike of choice for youth or adults who like to ride. It also has the Trek Marlin 8 WSD women’s style mountain bike. If you are a devoted Trek fan, then this is a great choice for a mountain bike that can fit the vast majority of people.

YETI SB140 Mountain Bike vs Trek 4900 disc

First of all the YETI SB140 Mountain Bike is a high-end race mountain bike, then it’s more about how they compare and whether riders are willing to take on harder mountain rides. If you’re more adventurous, then the YETI SB140 C2 is the best mountain bike in the YETI SB140 series for the money.

With the YETI SB140 Carbon C2 GX Eagle AXS Mountain Bike, you get: a C-series carbon frame, a 150mm Front Travel Fox Performance 36 Fork, a 140mm Rear Travel Fox Performance Float DPS Rear Shock, SRAM GX Eagle AXS Shifters, and many more high-end features. The super-loose 65.4-degree head tube angle allows for a comfortable ride throughout the mountain ride.

Whether you’re climbing steep hills or taking long descents. Or if you’re meeting up with a group of friends for a morning ride on a rest day, the YETI SB140 is a perfect choice. If you want to know more about them, you can click on the button.

Learn more about the YETI SB140 Mountain Bike

Schwinn Bonafide Mens Mountain Bike vs Trek 4900 Disc

Simple mountain riding can meet your daily riding needs if you are a casual rider. Large 29*2.25″ tires, 3X8 drivetrain, fast and accurate mechanical disc brakes, and a lightweight aluminum frame are included.

Although the configuration is not as high as the Trek 4900 disc take sample, at such a low price point, getting such a slew of accessories is reasonable, and adapts to the needs of commuter riders, who occasionally go to the hills of the ride, or in the less difficult mountain cross-country, are very enjoyable riding experiences.

With a great price and a low to mid-range package that meets the needs of the everyday commuter rider, the Schwinn Bonafide makes mountain biking more enjoyable for riders on a budget. It’s a mountain bike to think about.

Learn more: Schwinn Bonafide Mountain Bike Review

Final Verdict (4.2/5)

The Trek 4900 disc has a lightweight frame and a large number of gears. Many riders who have ridden this mountain bike have been impressed, but when viewed through today’s eyes, there are a lot of backward accessories that don’t fit our needs. However, it is a good mid-range mountain bike. This bike receives a final rating of (4.2/5) from us.

Related Videos

Related content

Is Trek 4500 Mountain Bike A Good Bike? [Trek 4500 Review]

Is The Trek 4300 A Good Mountain Bike? [Trek 4300 Review]

https://archive.trekbikes.com/us/en/2003/trek/4900#/us/en/2003/trek/4900/details

https://archive.trekbikes.com/us/en/2012/Trek/4900_disc#/us/en/2012/Trek/4900_disc/details

http://www.bikeroar.com/products/trek/4900-2014/specs

Related Posts

[Orbea URRUN 10 20mph Review] – Best Used By People Who Enjoy Riding To Get AFeel For The Mountains!

[schwinn admiral hybrid bicycle review] -is schwinn admiral hybrid bicycle worth buying？.

[Specialized Turbo Como 5.0 Review] – Good Choice?

15 of The Best Mountain Bike Saddles You Can Buy

20 INCH FOLDING BIKE BTWIN 120 Review－Fold up and put in “pocket”

2023 Top 10 Best Fun Kids Bike Bells – Will This Bring Joy To Your Child’s Ride?

27.5 vs 29er Mountain Bikes – The Battle Of The Century

Best 20 inch Bikes For 6-13 Years Old Kids Bikes (With Gears)

Best 27.2 Dropper Post

Best 30.9 Dropper Post In

Best 31.6 Dropper Post

Best Mountain Bike Stems-Better Travel Through The Mountains And Forests

Leave a comment cancel reply.

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Cycling made Simple.

Made By Cyclists

Trek 4900 Review

September 5, 2023

‍ Key Takeaways

• The Trek 4900 has a lightweight aluminum frame, making it easy to maneuver trails.
• The bike is suitable for both climbing and general road riding.
• The Trek 4900 has disc brakes for reliable stopping power in all conditions.
• Reviews show that it's a solid choice for beginners and intermediate riders alike.
• If you are on a budget, you can find a used Trek 4900 for a reasonable price.

This article may contain affiliate links where we earn a commission from qualifying purchases.

‍ If you’re looking for a rugged mountain bike that can handle the most challenging terrain, the Trek 4900 bike might be what you’re looking for.

The Trek 4900 bike is worth the investment. This mountain bike is designed to handle some of the most rugged trails thanks to its durable frame and high-quality components. This bike is a great choice for anyone looking for a reliable, high-performing mountain bike.

As a casual biker passionate about all things cycling, I bring you my perspective on the Trek 4900 bike. I’ve also interacted with other users and researched end-user reviews to provide you with accurate and trustworthy information. With years of experience in the industry, I'm confident that my review of the Trek 4900 will give you all the information you need to make an informed decision about your next mountain bike purchase.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

‍ Trek 4900 Specifications

If you're looking for a casual mountain bike that can handle cross-country riding, the Trek 4900 might suit you. This bike features a semi-integrated head tube, which gives it a sleek and modern look. The top tube is sloped, which makes it easier to dismount and mount the bike.

The Trek 4900 comes with a single coil fork, which is great for riders who want a smooth ride without worrying about adjusting the fork. The fork has magnesium lowers, which increases durability while keeping the weight down. The bike also comes with Bontrager tires, which provide great traction on various surfaces.

The Trek 4900 has hydraulic disc brakes, which provide reliable stopping power in all conditions. The bike also has a rear derailleur, which allows you to shift gears smoothly and easily. The pedals are durable and grip well, even in wet conditions.

Additional Features

The Trek 4900 is packed with additional features that make it stand out from other mid-range mountain bikes. Here are some of the features that you'll love:

Performance

The Trek 4900 is a mountain bike built to perform on the most rugged trails. The bike features an aluminum frame with forged dropouts, making it sturdy and durable.

The Trek 4900 is equipped with a Shimano Deore rear derailleur, which provides smooth and precise shifting. This makes it easy to shift gears as you ride, ensuring you always have the right gear for the terrain.

The bike also features a Suntour fork with remote lockout and adjustable preload. This allows you to adjust the suspension to suit your riding style and the terrain you are riding on. The fork provides excellent shock absorption, ensuring a smooth ride even on rough terrain.

The Trek 4900 also has fender mounts, making it a great choice for commuters who want to ride to work even in wet conditions. The bike is designed to handle all types of terrain, from rocky trails to smooth pavement.

The oversized Alpha SL aluminum frame of the Trek 4900 is built to withstand the toughest trails. The bike is designed to handle the most rugged terrain, making it a great choice for anyone who wants to push their limits.

The Bontrager SSR rims of the Trek 4900 are also designed to withstand the toughest trails. The rims are strong and durable, ensuring they can handle even the most demanding rides.

Frame and Design

The Trek 4900 is built with an aluminum frame that is both durable and lightweight. The frame is designed to handle the rigors of off-road riding and is equipped with forged dropouts that provide additional strength and stability. The oversized alpha top tube adds to the durability of the frame and helps to reduce flexing during hard rides.

The frame of the Trek 4900 is designed to be lightweight without sacrificing strength. This makes it easier to handle and maneuver on the trail. The mono-stay seat stay design helps to reduce weight and provides additional clearance for larger tires.

The Trek 4900 frame is also designed with a sleek and modern look. The lightweight frame is complemented by various lightweight components, including the suspension fork, wheels, and drivetrain. This helps to keep the overall weight of the bike down, making it easier to handle and maneuver on the trail.

Fork and Suspension

The Trek 4900 bike comes with a Suntour fork that has a remote lockout feature. This means that you can lock the fork from the handlebars, which is a useful feature when you are climbing. The lockout feature makes the fork rigid, which helps to transfer more power to the pedals.

The fork on the Trek 4900 is semi-integrated, meaning it is not a full-suspension fork. It has a single coil spring with magnesium lowers. The fork has hydra-coil damping, which provides a smooth ride.

The suspension on the Trek 4900 is adequate for most riders. It’s not a full-suspension bike, but the fork does a good job of absorbing bumps on the trail. Overall, the fork and suspension on the Trek 4900 are well-suited for cross-country riding.

Wheels and Tires

The Trek 4900 comes with Bontrager Ranger alloy rims or Bontrager SSR wheels and tires, depending on the version. The wheels are made of aluminum and are durable enough to handle rough terrain. They’re also lightweight, which makes the bike easier to handle and maneuver.

The tires of the 2006 version are 26 inches in diameter and have a width of 2.2 inches. They provide good traction on most surfaces, including loose gravel and dirt. The tread pattern offers a good balance of grip and rolling resistance, making the bike efficient on both climbs and descents.

One thing to note is that the tires are not tubeless-ready, so you’ll need to use inner tubes. This is not a big deal, but it does mean that you will need to carry a spare tube with you in case of a flat.

Riding Experience

When it comes to riding experience, the Trek 4900 is a solid choice for both casual and experienced riders alike. The bike is designed to handle the most rugged trails, making it a great option for those who want to take on challenging terrain.

The Trek 4900 is also a great option for cross-country riding, as it is lightweight and easy to maneuver. The bike's geometry is designed to provide a comfortable and efficient riding position, which is great for longer rides.

Drivetrain and Gears

When it comes to the drivetrain and gears on the Trek 4900, you'll find a reliable setup that can handle a variety of terrain.

This bike comes equipped with a Shimano Deore rear derailleur, which is known for its smooth shifting and durability. This component helps ensure that you can easily shift gears as you climb hills or pick up speed on flat sections of the trail.

The rear derailleur is just one part of the bike's overall drivetrain, which includes the chain, cassette, and front derailleur. Together, these components work to transfer power from your pedals to the rear wheel, propelling you forward.

The Trek 4900 does not disappoint when it comes to its stopping power. Equipped with hydraulic disc brakes, you can stop on a dime, even when going downhill at high speeds.

The disc brakes provide more consistent stopping power than traditional rim brakes, making it easier to control your speed and avoid accidents.

If you're a rider who loves to have fun and push your limits, the Trek 4900's brakes will give you the confidence to do so. You won't have to worry about your brakes failing you when you need them the most, which can make all the difference when riding in tough terrain or country mountains.

• Strong, durable aluminum frame that can handle rough trails and jumps.
• The frame is also lightweight, making it easier to maneuver and control the bike.
• Smooth and precise shifting
• Powerful brakes
• The suspension fork absorbs bumps and vibrations, providing a smoother ride.
• 26-inch versatile tires that are suitable for a wide range of terrains.
• Heavyweight
• It only has a front suspension
• Limited gear range

Final Verdict

Overall, the Trek 4900 is a great choice for anyone who wants a durable and versatile mountain bike that can handle a wide range of terrains and riding styles. Whether you're racing or just riding for fun, the Trek 4900 has the power and capabilities to take you wherever you want to go.

The components of the Trek 4900 are durable and reliable, which makes it a great choice for racing or just riding with friends. The shifters are smooth and easy to use, and the grips are comfortable and provide a secure hold on the handlebar.

Where to Buy

You can buy the Trek 4900 bike online from eBay or the official Trek Bikes website . The Trek 4900 is a mid-range hardtail mountain bike that offers good value for money. However, note that the price and value of the Trek 4900 vary depending on the year and model.

You can often find used bikes for a fraction of the cost of a new one. However, be sure to inspect the bike carefully before you buy it to ensure that it's in good condition.

Why Road Cyclists Are Switching to Gravel Bikes

Why Fitness Enthusiasts Are Switching to Smart Cycling Trainers

Why Competitive Cyclists Are Switching to Aero Road Bikes

Why Eco-Conscious Riders Are Switching to Bamboo Bikes

About THE AUTHOR

Danny Lawson

Mountain biking is more than just a hobby for me - it's a way of life. I love the challenge and excitement that comes with it, and I'm always pushing myself to go faster and ride harder. Some people might think that mountain biking is dangerous, but I see it as the only way to live.

Trending Now

Why City Dwellers Are Switching to Folding Bikes

Why Budget-Conscious Riders Are Switching to Co-op Bike Brands

Why Mountain Bikers Are Switching to Fat Tire Bikes

Why Urban Commuters Are Switching to Electric Bikes

About PedalChef

PedalChef is a blog on all things cycling. We are a group of people who love bikes, and we want to share the joy that comes with the experience. You can read more about us here .

©2024 PedalChef. All rights reserved.

We can be reached at [email protected]

PedalChef.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon. This site also participates in other affiliate programs, and is compensated for referring traffic and business to these companies.

My Location

We will use the location to give you relevant local information across MoreDirt.

Bike Profile

• Rate My Ride

trek - 2011 4900 disc

Fox Ranger Gel Gloves SP21

NOW £22.00 RRP £35.00 | SAVE 37%

Race Face Ride MTB Pedals

NOW £19.99 RRP £44.95 | SAVE 56%

Specialized Stumpjumper Pro Carbon Eagle X01 AXS 2022 Gloss Oasis

NOW £4,399.00 RRP £8,250.00 | SAVE 47%

Fox Racing Speedframe Pro MIPS Helmet FA21

NOW £114.99 RRP £149.99 | SAVE 23%

Specialized 2FO DH Flat MTB Shoe

NOW £59.99 RRP £145.00 | SAVE 59%

Specialized 2FO Method MTB Flat Shoes

NOW £71.10 RRP £79.00 | SAVE 10%

• Description
• Comments (4)

trimmtrab said on 21 February 2011

Great base for a custom build - like it!

Please login to reply to this comment.

nathan83 said on 15 February 2011

nice hardtail mate, like the colours on the frame, rate my GT xs1 cheers

martthemanc said on 14 February 2011

looks good decent bike now just to go and get it full of mud

catchup replied... on 14 February 2011

yeah i intend to this weekend at gisburn forest, already bought myself some muc off lol

MountainBikerChris said on 14 February 2011

Solid hardtail, i like trek's!

View More Comments

Leave a comment

Want to add your comments about this bike? Login or Sign-up by clicking the button below.

Promote Your Business

• Business Owners
• Event Organisers
• Advertise with Us
• Add Your Event
• Get Involved
• Top Contributors
• MoreDirt Plus

Want the best MTB news straight to your inbox?

Sign up for our newsletter!

© More Dirt Ltd 2024. Company Number: 8034657. All content remains copyright of More Dirt Ltd unless stated otherwise...

Terms of use | Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | Sitemap

• ALL MOUNTAIN
• ACCESSORIES
• ALL (130 Forums)
• WHEELS & TIRES

Trek 4900 XC Hardtail

• Rear Derailleur
• Front Suspension
• Alpha SL Aluminum
• Bontrager Ranger alloy rims
• USER REVIEWS

I got the 2006 Trek 4900 Disc, as my "return to cycling" bike at age 42. It is heavy, slow and the components group is one step above a Walmart brand bike. However, I bought this bike for cardio therapy after 24 years of smoking. Getting back into biking after decades of tobacco abuse was not easy and I wanted to see how I would fare. I rode the 4900 for 1000 miles on the road. I even took it on one MTB trail ride.... with laughable results. I sold it after I realized I actually enjoyed cycling once again. However, I was done with this 35-pound Transitional Bike. I basically got all my $200 investment back, as this bike changed hands to the proud new owner.

Rock Shox DART fork compresses and tops out, with a heady "thunk." Hydroformed, Alpha SL alloy is quite honestly, a boat anchor. Don't bother upgrading parts on this frame. Use it for a learning experience, to get some base cardio fitness established. Pass it onward, once you want a purpose-built Mountain Bike.

Tough bike. A little heavy but it has never had any issues or let me down. It's been up and down desert, mountain, and forest terrain. Now we have added pulling my kids in a trailer through the woods (with all of them and trailer approx 80-100lbs). Does a great job... use the gears to help with extra weight and can shift multiple gears at a time. Nice for quick accents and descents.. For the price it's a GREAT bike. Mine is roughly 14 years old, still does great, and I do not plan to upgrade. Overall this a great bike seemed I would recommend it unless you are a hardcore mountain biker.

A little heavy and new bikes have cables enclosed along with

Reliability.

Some components are cheap. Fork doesn't lock. But I don't think this would make a huge difference for most amateur riders.

More of a review, this is a tribute post to a tough and dependable bike. Bought in 2006 for ~$600 and kept all stock for most of its lifetime. Rode it for more than a decade and never left me stranded. I recently took it on a 4 day / 360 miles ride after a few mods (saddle, stem and tires) and it worked like a champ. On a biking event across several >9% climbs a guy came to me amazed I was riding this bike, I still don't understand why. Today I got a Bulls Copperhead 29 RSI and I thought about selling the 4900 for a few bucks on eBay or donate it. Then I changed my mind and instead got a new fork to replace the stock RockShox J1 and will probably get new breaks as well. I will keep this bike. I don't get attached to things, but this bike is special. I don't understand the bad reviews here, maybe they aren't good riders and blame it on the bike, or they got a lemon?. I used to go MTB with guys riding 2K+ full suspensions and I never had problems catching up with them and going through the same terrain and obstacles. That's probably the reason why I kept it, I never felt I needed more. Now as I approach 40, I found myself doing more long distance XC than MTB, so the Copperhead will suit me better for that purpose; and for the days I just want to hit the mountain, going downhill fast and attack corners as when in my 20s, I will take this old little friend with me.

Solid frame, decent seat, wheels, brakes, crank and inexpensive.

Everything else.

I bought this in about 2006. It seems to have a very short wheelbase because I cannot ride it no hands. I replaced my stolen Trek 6000 which I liked a lot more. I only get about a few midrange gears now but I have put it through some moderate tests. Bottom Line: I wouldn't buy it again unless I was going to upgrade almost everything! Suck.

The frame and upgrade possibilities

The stock Bontrager stem is one of the ugliest things I have ever seen, lol (I have 4 in my garage from various Trek/ Gary Fisher bikes)

Bikes prices have gotten out of control yet you get low end components (Shimano Acer, Alivio, Suntour fork). The older Treks are a dime a dozen and take a beating. Love the frame. Mostly use the 4900 for local XC.

Similar Products Used:

TREK 4500,6500, 8 series, GT Avalanche, GT Zaskar

Strong but light frame, good base components, not the best, but for the money, they are good. If you use this for more than just Saturday laps around the loose-over-hard trails, you'll probably replace the majority of the stuff.

Drivetrain, again, good for the money, but not the greatest, kind of weak.

I bought this bike excpecting to change out the majority of the components. It was on sale, an so I figured it would be cheaper to buy this and upgrade pieces, rathr than buy a higher model that would be more xpensive in the long run. I ride intermediate trails, and this bike has taken a beating. When I first switched to clipless, this bike took more spills than a two year olds juice box. It's held up incredibly well. The stock Judy 1 forks were poopoo, but they were switched out soon after purchasing. The Bontrager Crowbar handlebars also developed a weird crack after a couple months, must have been faulty in some way. Other bits and pieces need replacing if you are planning on putting it to real good use. If you are just starting out, this is a nice beginner's bike; stock. If you can find it cheap, like I did, and plan on upgrades anyway, it's a great bike for intermediate riders, or anyone who still has a soft-spot for hard-tails. The core of it is outstanding. I've had my huevos busted a couple of times for riding it, but I still think it's great, lots of fun, light, holds up really well and I can do anything that my friends can do that my personal skills allow.

Fisher, Specialized

Well.. I have had this bike for 4 years now, and I am just now switching out the drivetrain. Yes, it is weak, but it has taken a beating and would have kept ticking for a bit yet.. The Frame is like Hercules

Drivetrain, seat (a minor thing), Fork

This was a great progression bike.. and it's super tough too. (It fell off of my boyfriends trunk-car-rack going about 80MPH and all I had was a bent wheen and a broken brake lever) This was my first "mountian bike" and I built it to my liking over these past couple of years. I have progresed right along side my bike, and I am able to race on this. Maybe it's me being sentimental, or maybe its my awesome bike, but I love it! I really cant complain as this bike has never let me down, it rides like a champ and has never left me out to dry. Just remember, you are not out buying a top of the line bike, I think you get the best bang for your buck here. A+++

GT Avalanche

This bike is amazing as both a tough trail bike and a commuter bike riding to classes and around town. Great Shimano components, I LOVE the shifters. Solid Deore derailleur in the rear, decent stock Bontrager tires, great brakes, and a frame with very simple and lightweight construction make an ideal bike for many uses.

I have never felt any significant difference using the "adjustable" suspension on the fork. The cranks snap crackle and pop more than a box of Rice Crispies. Get rid of the stock pedals.

After riding this bike for several years I know that it can take all sorts of abuse from very technical downhill rides. Even so, that's not what it's meant for. This Trek really shines as a great XC bike. It climbs GREAT and can still take a beating from very fast descents. After years of use, it just takes simple routine maintenance to keep this bike in good shape-- new chain every now and then, new brakes when necessary, and a chain lube twice a month. This bike is perfect for a college student like me who loves to get out in the mountains but doesn't have the money to buy a downhill bike for the weekends. 5 Flamin' Chilis for value!!! Trek, you NAILED this one!!

Jamis Durango, GF Mullet.

To start off it has a great looking frame, Good rear derailleur (if you use it properly), Disk Brakes!, has a nice feel to it when you ride, durable.

Seat is kinda stiff but you start to like it after a while (if not its not that much to replace), The fork isn't the best around but it hasn't broken on me or anything so it does its job

Great brike for the price. If your a weekend warrior who goes riding about 2days a week then this is a good bike for you. Its very durable, ive crashed it tons of times, landed on rock roots you name it and nothing has broken (except the reflectors, lol). I would recomend putting in clipless pedals if you wanna improve your riding efficiency and power. Sometimes the brakes get loose but they are really easy to re tighten, much easier than v-brakes. This bike i must confess is acutally not mine, my school rents them out for free, but i usually ride it about 3-4 days a week for the past 6 months. And when I'm not riding it other people are so you can imagine it gets allot of use and abuse, and with all that everything still functions fine. The rear derailleur ghost shifts sometimes and has problems shifting once in a while but that is because people who don't know how to shift have messed it up. Its an all around good bike and i highly recommend it unless you plan on doing some more serious or long term riding. But if mountain biking is something you just do for fun and aren't crazy about high performance you'll be very pleased with this bike. Although it doesn't ride like a $900 - $1100 bike, its not far behind (especially if you add clipless pedals). Note: If your reading this you might know that they don't make it for 2007 anymore, but they have basically uprgaded it to the 6000 level which has much improvements over the 4900 and is still in the same price range, mabye 30 bucks more, i recommend going for that one if you can't find a 4900 still around for sale.

Great looks, strong, light frame, Shimano Deore rear derailleur, disk brakes, Bontrager wheels

A bit heavy at 28lbs(OK, for full suspension), pedals

Great all-around XC bike, for weekend warrior. Fast on the straights, with excellent climbing geometry. Upgrade to clipless pedals, for best results. Stock shock is NOT designed for anything more than 1ft drops. Keep the bike well-oiled, clean, and the drivetrain tuned-up, and this bike will not dissappoint. A real mountain bike at a real price!

Cannondale F600, Gary Fisher Zebrano, Specialized Rock Hopper FS

Get the latest mountain bike reviews, news, race results, and much more by signing up for the MTBR Newsletter

Hot Deals See All Hot Deals >>

• CLASSIFIEDS
• TERMS OF USE
• PRIVACY POLICY
• ADVERTISING

VISIT US AT

© Copyright 2024 VerticalScope Inc. All rights reserved.

• Rocky Mountain
• Specialized
• YT Industries
• Allied Cycle Works
• Black Market
• DALLINGRIDGE
• Diamondback
• Early Rider
• EVO Bicycles
• Growler Bikes
• Guerrilla Gravity
• iGO Electric
• Intense 951
• Juiced Bikes
• View all brands
• Production Privee
• Rad Power Bikes
• Rambo Bikes
• Riese & Müller
• Soul Fast E Bikes
• Spark Cycleworks
• State Bicycle Co.
• Structure Cycleworks
• Surface 604
• Van Nicholas
• Vintage Electric
• We Are One Composites

• Cross Country

• All Mountain

• AUS $ NZD $ USD $ CAD $ GBP £ EUR €

Size / 13", 16", 18", 19.5", 21", 22.5"

At a glance

Where to buy.

Specifications

• Frame Alpha SL aluminum
• Wheels Alloy F, Shimano R hub; Maverick rims
• Wheel Size 26"
• Tires Bontrager ACX, 26x2.2", 52/54
• Crank Bontrager Sport 42/32/22
• Front Derailleur Shimano Alivio
• Rear Derailleur Shimano Deore
• Shifters Shimano Alivio
• Brakeset Alloy linear pull w/alloy levers
• Handlebar Bontrager Sport, 25mm rise
• Saddle Bontrager FS 2000
• Seatpost Bontrager Sport
• Stem Bontrager Sport, 25 degree
• Headset Aheadset, semi-cartridge, sealed

Q: Where to buy a 2004 Trek 4900?

The 2004 Trek 4900 may be purchased directly from Trek .

Q: What size wheels does the 2004 Trek 4900 have?

The 2004 Trek 4900 has 26" wheels.

Q: What size 2004 Trek 4900 should I get?

No comments on this bike yet. Why not be the first?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Want more MTB in your mailbox?

The latest on mountain bikes delivered straight to your mailbox.

More Bikes in Range View All

Trek 4900 WSD

More cross country bikes view all.

Cannondale Trail 6

Merida BIG.NINE XT2

Fezzari Wasatch Peak Comp Race 27.5+

Deals view all, view all deals, recent posts view all.

Blackburn Honest Digital Pressure Gauge Review

It's 2020 people. The squeeze and bounce test doesn't cut it anymore (and this is…

Comparing Mountain Bikes

Mountain Bikes are complicated machines. They have parts from hundreds of different manufacturers, come in…

Undomestic Mountain Bikes: Here’s what we know

Update March 2020: Undomestic has announced that they are manufacturing frames "at this moment" and…

Send Feedback

Have a suggestion? Looking for a bike that's not on MTB Database? Or perhaps you've spotted an error?

We'd love to hear from you. Let us know with the form below.

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience possible. Learn more.

About MTB Database

Explore, search and compare thousands of the world’s best mountain bikes here on Mountain Bike Database.

Compare prices, components, suspension, reviews, images and more on current and past MTB’s. You can even share reviews, comments and questions on mountain bikes. View and compare a huge selection of bikes from brands such as Trek , Specialized , Giant , Santa Cruz , Norco and more .

We strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information for mountain bikes on MTB Database. If you’ve spotted any issues, please let us know . We also include helpful tools, such as our frame size calculator, to assist you in choosing the right mountain bike. Bear in mind that these tools serve as a guide and simply provide a general indication. Refer to information provided by your bike manufacturer for the most applicable information for your bike.

Bikes By Brand

Bikes by year, bikes by riding style, bikes by wheel size, popular bikes.

• 2022 Specialized Epic EVO Comp
• 2022 Trek Marlin 6
• 2022 Specialized Enduro Comp
• 2022 Specialized S-Works Epic EVO
• 2022 Specialized Epic EVO Expert
• 2022 Giant Fathom 29 1
• 2022 Trek Marlin 7

Latest Bikes

• 2023 Commencal SUPREME DH V5 SIGNATURE 70'S
• 2023 Orange Phase 29 Factory
• 2022 Commencal META SX V4 TEAM Frame
• 2023 Commencal SUPREME DH V5 SIGNATURE LTD
• 2023 Commencal META SX V4 - Frame
• 2023 Riese & Müller Swing4 vario
• 2023 Riese & Müller Swing4 silent

• Trek 4900 Disc 2013
• Crosscountry

Bike summary

Bike components.

Alpha Gold Aluminum w/semi-integrated head tube, butted and hydroformed tubing, internal front derailleur cable routing, replaceable derailleur hanger

Rear Derailleur

Shimano Deore XT Shadow

Front Derailleur

Shimano Deore

Shift Levers

Shimano Deore, 10 speed

Shimano HG62 11-36, 10 speed

Shimano M552, 42/32/24

Wellgo nylon platform

Shimano M475 alloy hubs w/Bontrager AT-850 32-hole double-walled rims

Bontrager XR2, 26x2.20"

Avid Elixir 1 hydraulic disc brakes

Bontrager Race Lite, 31.8mm, 7 degree

Bontrager Low Riser, 31.8mm, 15mm rise, 9 degree sweep

1-1/8" threadless, semi-integrated, semi-cartridge bearings

Bontrager Evoke 1

Bontrager SSR, 31.6mm, 12mm offset

Bike geometry

Model overview.

4900 Disc completes the Trek 4900 model. There are 9 bikes that carry this model name.

Take safety seriously when you ride your bike, and always wear your helmet. Moreover, don’t ride on the sidewalk. This is actually against the law in some states and can be dangerous for both you and pedestrians.

Crosscountry bikes average price

According to our math, the average price for a trustworthy Crosscountry bike is 1905 $ . However, even though the average price of a Crosscountry bike is lower, you might still be able to get a top-quality bike. To make sure you don’t pay a higher amount than normal for your bike, always do some components analysis and read reviews.

Internal Cable Routing

This bike has an internal cable routing. As a result, this helps to preserve the bike’s cables. No more cables around your bike.

Overview of components

Wheels size.

The wheels on 4900 Disc are the 26″ aluminum type. These wheels give you great handling over your bike. However, they provide less traction than 29″ wheels do.

Nothing is more important on a bike than its ability to brake properly. Trek 4900 Disc is equipped with Hydraulic Disc brakes. Hydraulic disc brakes are perfect for mountain biking, road cycling, and commuting. To sum up, these are ideal for anyone.

Trek 4900 models from 2014

Trek 4900 models from 2012, trek 4900 models from 2011, trek 4900 models from 2010, trek 4900 models from 2006, trek 4900 models from 2004, trek 4900 models from 2003.

Not sure what's your riding style?

Find your ideal bike in seconds!

Take our 30 seconds quizz and find out which bikes suit you the best.

Handy tools

Tools to help you even more.

Trek 4300 Mountain Bike Review: Is it worth it?

Looking for a reliable and affordable mountain bike that can handle rugged terrain? The Trek 4300 might just be the bike for you. 

As a mountain bike, Trek 4300 is built to take on any adventure. Thanks to a durable aluminum frame, wide range of gears, and powerful brakes. 

In this article, we’ll take a closer look at the Trek 4300 mountain bike, its features, and what makes it stand out from the competition. 

Read on to find out if the Trek 4300 is the right mountain bike for you.

Trek 4300 Mountain Bike At A Glance 

Trek 4300 is a hardtail mountain bike with a lightweight and sturdy Alpha aluminum frame, which makes it easy to handle. While the Marlin 5 is made for trail riding, it’s also versatile and can double as a commuter bike. 

The Shimano drivetrain and powerful disc brakes offer great versatility on all types of terrain. While the front suspension provides excellent balance and stability on rougher roads or trails, ensuring smooth rides. 

It also comes with double-walled rims and puncture-resistant 26×2.0″ tires, making it a reliable choice for trail riding. 

Trek 4300 is the perfect combination of affordability and quality, which is a great choice for beginner riders looking to hit the trails.

• Sturdy and lightweight aluminum frame
• Responsive brakes and smooth shifting
• Comfortable riding position
• Adjustable saddle and handlebars
• Complex 3X drivetrain
• Small 26-inch wheels

Unfortunately, this bike has been discontinued, but Trek has impressive newer models with better designs which are excellent alternatives to the 4300 Trek mountain bike. 

We recommend Trek Marlin 5 and Schwinn Traxion as great alternatives, you can scroll down to see our brief review of these bikes. 

Trek 4300 Mountain Bike Features

Frame and fork.

First things first, the frame is a crucial component of any bike. In the case of the Trek 4300, it’s made of aluminum, which is a popular choice due to its durability, affordability, and lightweight. 

In fact, the original 4300 model used Trek’s Alpha Aluminum frame that’s tough enough to handle rugged trails with ease. As the model progressed, Trek introduced the Alpha Gold Aluminum material for the frame of the later versions of the 4300. 

This updated version has a more aggressive race geometry for speed, with internal cable routing for durability, and rack mounts for versatility.

You’ll also find that it has a replaceable derailleur hanger. Now, these upgrades made the bike more versatile and allowed it to handle a wider range of terrain.

Moving on to the fork, the Trek 4300 is a classic hardtail mountain bike with a front fork. This means that the front wheel is equipped with a suspension system that can absorb shocks and vibrations, making for a smoother ride on moderate terrain. 

The suspension fork has 70-100 mm travel, depending on the specific model, and it’s designed to handle mountain trails. However, it’s important to note that the suspension fork isn’t long enough to handle descents on rough trails. 

So while it can certainly absorb some bumps, it’s not enough for really difficult trails or downhill riding. But don’t worry, this bike can still take a lot of abuse. After all, it’s a mountain bike, and it’s designed to handle dirt trails.

Gears and Brakes

Gears and brakes are some of the most important components of a mountain bike, especially if you plan on hitting tough trails or climbing hills. 

Let’s take a closer look at the gear and brake systems on the Trek 4300 mountain bike.

In the first few generations of the Trek 4300, you could find a 3x8spd drivetrain with 24 gears.

But if you’re looking for something a bit more efficient, the later models of the Trek 4300 were fitted with the Shimano Acera M390 9-speed drivetrain. This gives you a wider range of gears for better control on hard trails.

Now, let’s talk about brakes. If you carefully look through all the different versions of the Trek 4300, you’ll find that some of them had rim brakes and some others had disc brakes. 

The older models were fitted with rim brakes, while the later models featured the Shimano M395 hydraulic disc brakes, which gives a much better braking power at a great price. 

Wheels and Tires

Most mountain bikes we see now have 29-inch wheels, but the Trek 4300 had 26-inch wheels and 26×2.20 tires, which actually are very agile and will quickly pick up speed. 

In later models, these tires were improved to be puncture resistant and could withstand increased tire pressure. 

We consider bigger wheels to be better for mountain riding, but small wheels aren’t that bad either because they are more agile, tend to accelerate faster and will easily move around tight corners. And these features are great for technical riding. 

But the bigger 27.5 and 29″ wheels actually provide more stability and comfort, which is why they are now preferred for mountain biking.

Despite the small wheels, the double-walled rims and 32-spoke design of the Trek 4300 are pretty solid and tough enough to withstand years of abuse on the trails.

At the end of the day, the wheels and tires on the Trek 4300 are a great combination for riders who want to tackle technical terrain and need a bike that can handle quick acceleration and tight cornering. 

While the market may be shifting towards larger wheels, the Trek 4300 is still a great option for those who value nimble handling and puncture resistance.

Saddle and Handlebars

The saddle is an important component of any bike, especially when it comes to mountain biking. 

While the standard saddle on the Trek 4300 may not be the most comfortable, the 31.6mm seatpost offers plenty of adjustment for a customized fit. 

You can even upgrade the saddle to one that suits your preferences for maximum comfort.

The handlebars of the Trek 4300 are a different story, though. Made from durable alloy, these handlebars are built to withstand the rigors of off-road riding. 

With a 31.8mm diameter and 15mm rise, the handlebars provide a comfortable and stable grip while you ride.

The stem of the Trek 4300 is also designed for both comfort and control. With a 31.8mm clamp diameter and a 10-degree rise, the stem ensures a comfortable riding position while keeping you in control of the bike. 

When you combine the Bontrager Riser handlebar and the Bontrager Approved stem on the Trek 4300, you get a comfortable and stable ride. 

Size and weight

When it comes to finding the right fit, the Trek 4300 Mountain Bike has got you covered. With a wide range of frame sizes available, from 13″ to 22.5″, you’re sure to find the perfect fit for your body type. 

Actually, you may find sizes ranging from 13, 16, 18, 19.5, 21.5, 23.5″. But since these bikes have been discontinued by Trek, finding them in the exact size you want may be a challenge.

One thing to keep in mind is that the bike weighs around 28.2lbs (12.8 kg), which might not make it the lightest bike on the market. I believe this is due to the front fork, which adds weight but also adds extra shock absorption for a more comfortable ride. 

However, this bike is sturdy enough to support riders up to 265 lbs of body weight.

Ride quality and performance

The Trek 4300 Mountain Bike offers fun and confident rides on the trails, whether you’re hitting the trails or cruising around town. 

While it’s considered an entry-level mountain bike, don’t let that fool you. It’s a reliable bike that can be used for commuting, leisurely rides, or for hitting some challenging trails.

The comfortable riding position and triple chainring setup make it easy to tackle steep hills and rough terrain. Plus, the high-quality suspension system keeps things smooth and comfortable, no matter what kind of surface you’re riding on.

Trek 4300 has durable components that are built to last, so you don’t have to worry about things breaking down quickly. 

The responsive brakes and smooth-shifting gears give you complete control and make riding this bike a breeze. And, even in wet or muddy conditions, the disc brakes offer reliable stopping power.

One of the best things about the Trek 4300 is its versatility. While it’s certainly a capable mountain bike, it’s also a great choice for commuting or everyday riding. 

Best Trek 4300 Alternatives

As Trek 4300 mountain bikes are now discontinued, you cannot buy them brand new. However, Trek has a range of trail bikes that offer superior build quality and performance. 

These models are more advanced and come at a higher price point than the budget options available from brands like Schwinn and Mongoose, but the investment is worth it as the quality is unmatched.

In my opinion, the Trek Marlin 5 and Schwinn Traxion are great alternatives for the Trek 4300 mountain bike.

Trek Marlin 5

Trek Marlin 5 is a trail mountain bike that’s built to gracefully handle daily adventures on rough terrains. It has a lightweight aluminum frame with a 2×8 drivetrain for smooth riding and shifting and powerful hydraulic disc brakes which provide fast and precise stopping. 

While the Marlin 5 is made for trail riding, it’s also versatile and can double as a commuter bike. This bike has a stunning frame with internal routing for the brake and shift cables, which can extend the lifespan of your wires by shielding them from the environment.

It’s the perfect bike for new trail riders and comes in seven frame sizes to fit riders of all heights. Marlin 5 is elegant and comfortable, with a ton of features that are typically reserved for more pricey bikes.

Schwinn Traxion

The Traxion MTB is equipped with a remarkably solid aluminum full-suspension frame that easily picks up speed and maintains it very well.

This bike provides comfortable rides and handles bumps well, regardless of where your trail adventures take you. Thanks to the wide knobby tires, sturdy double-walled aluminum rims, and a superb trail-taming Schwinn suspension fork. 

The 24 speed shifters also ensure fluid gear shifting, which makes for a fun and pleasant riding experience. In addition to that, the mechanical disc brakes lock into place instantly when applied, and this ensures precise and efficient stopping. 

The wheels have all-terrain tires and alloy rims for strength and low weight. Plus, you can easily adjust the height of the saddle using the quick release seat post to get your best fit. 

Related Post: Schwinn Traxion Mountain Bike Review

Finally, is Trek 4300 MTB a good buy?

The Trek 4300 mountain bike is a reliable and versatile bike that can handle a variety of terrains and riding styles. 

With its durable aluminum frame, wide range of gears, and powerful brakes, this bike is a great choice for both beginners and experienced riders. 

Trek 4300 offers a solid balance of performance and affordability. And if you’re looking for a reliable and budget-friendly mountain bike, the Trek 4300 is definitely worth considering.

You likely won’t find a brand-new Trek 4300, but the alternative options we included above are great choices too.

You may also like:

• Best Budget Mountain Bikes Under $400
• Best Budget Mountain Bikes Under $300
• Best Mountain Bikes for $1500 and below

Dial up your biking experience.

BikeCrunch’s content is for informational and educational purposes only.

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. However, this does not impact our reviews and comparisons. We try our best to keep things fair and balanced, in order to help you make the best choice for you.

© BikeCrunch

Moskva-Class Cruisers

Separate design teams often attempt to meet a set of ship specifications with completely different, although equally valid, strategies. To fulfill the requirements issued in April 2169 for the successor (NX-223) to the Daedalus class, which was introduced at the end of the Romulan War, Prosser & Ankopitch proposed a ship with an extremely large, spherical command hull attached to a nearly vestigial engineering hull. The proposal from the Mikoyan-Tupolev-Dassault Bureau used a long narrow command hull with a minimal frontal silhouette counterbalanced by an equally long engineering hull.

The engineers at Tezuka-Republic decided that the division of ship's functions between a command/crew hull and an engineering hull was arbitrary and unnecessarily restricted design options. Therefore, rather than gathering all the specified facilities in a single hull, their design TR-223A spread them across two hulls, as in Daedalus , and segregated the SSWR-IV-C warp core to a "bustle" at the extreme aft end of the secondary hull. This bustle could be separated easily and quickly from the rest of the engineering hull in the event of a warp core breach. The now-unpowered warp nacelles would then be shed. In this way, the demands of safety would be met without warp dynamics being degraded either by an excessively large frontal silhouette or by longitudinal warp field imbalance.

Although the Ship Specifications Review Board praised Tezuka-Republic for its creative solution to the problem of admittedly contradictory requirements for extreme safety and improved warp performance, they were forced to disqualify design TR-223A for not precisely meeting contract specifications. Therefore, in October 2171, construction contract NX-223 for Starfleet's new cruiser was awarded to Prosser & Ankopitch for what would become the Wasp class .

However, almost no one was happy with the new Wasp ships. Even before the contract was awarded, voices within Starfleet and within industry had strongly criticized the specifications of April 2169. These critics charged that they would lead to a mediocre, albeit safe, fighting ship. Two separate classes were needed, not a single class that was neither a proper explorer nor a proper warship. When Wasp was finally launched in 2173, her performance during precommisioning trials clearly showed that the critics had been correct. Although the performance problems were related in part to the continuing unavailability of the more powerful Tezuka-Republic Hiryu ("Flying Dragon") mark III warp nacelles, Wasp was obviously not the ship Starfleet had hoped for.

In a second attempt to obtain a reliable and capable warship, new specifications (NX-374) were issued in September 2175, little more than a year after USS  Wasp had entered service. Adding to this sense of urgency were intelligence reports suggesting that the Romulans had either developed or otherwise acquired matter/antimatter (M/AM) reactors. This time the specifications put less emphasis upon safety. The original requirement for completely separate command and engineering hulls was eliminated; instead, any hull configuration was allowed as long as the warp core could be quickly separated from the rest of the ship. Furthermore, requirements for speed, acceleration, and maneuverability both under impulse power and under warp power were increased, as were performance levels for target acquisition, tracking, and servicing.

These new specifications were a clear, albeit belated, admission that the critics had been correct all along: one class could not be expected to serve as both an explorer and a main battleship. In fact, starship technology was not considered sufficiently mature for a single ship to adequately fulfill both mission profiles until 2245, when the Constitution -class heavy cruiser was launched. (The controversy continues even today in the wake of the problems of the Galaxy -class explorer.)

Luckily, the designers and engineers at Tezuka-Republic had not been idle since their disappointing loss of the Wasp contract in 2171. Instead, they had spent their time refining design TR-223A so that their new entry (TR-374A) was markedly superior to what had been submitted 5 years earlier. In particular, the new SSWR-V warp reactor allowed the bustle to be made smaller, lighter, and even more easily separable. Therefore, it was hardly surprising when in November 2176 Tezuka-Republic was awarded the production contract over designs from Shimata-Dominquez, Prosser & Ankopitch, Mikoyan-Tupolev Dassault, Monarch R&U, and Thornycroft/Ebisu for what was to become the Moskva class.

However, engineering prowess may not have been the only factor in Tezuka-Republic's winning of the contract. There were accusations that the delay in delivery of the Hiryu warp engines was an attempt by Tezuka-Republic to prevent Wasp from reaching her designed performance levels. While no conclusive incriminating evidence has come to light, the delivery of the long-awaited engines shortly before the scheduled launch of Moskva in December 2177 is certainly suspicious. Tezuka-Republic maintains that if their submission of 2169 had been selected, its performance would also have not have met design specifications without the Hiryu engines. However, critics charge that TR-223A was not as reliant as Wasp on the type of engine used. Furthermore, once the Wasp contract was awarded, and even after Wasp was launched, Tezuka-Republic certainly made no efforts to accelerate delivery of Hiryu.

These controversies were soon rendered moot as the new Moskva class was recognized as a significant advance in starship design. The most important new feature was Moskva's discoid primary hull. Earlier designs had chosen a spherical primary hull for reasons of economy. Simple geometric relationships dictate that a spherical hull has the smallest surface area for a given volume. Therefore, construction costs are lower and shields are more efficient. Furthermore, institutional inertia had led nearly all exploratory cruisers originating until that time from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the United States Astronautics Agency, the United Earth Space Probe Agency, and its successor organizations to have spherical hulls.

The designers of USS  Moskva employed a biconvex disc for several reasons. Their initial motive was to increase hull volume while minimizing both frontal and lateral silhouettes. A warship with large frontal and lateral silhouettes would be at a greater disadvantage in most tactical situations than would be a ship with an increased superior silhouette. However, the discoid hull allowed the traditional radial layout of command hulls to be retained.

More important than these tactical advantages were functional advantages. As was shown with the Wasp class, warp field geometry would have been awkward if a spherical hull with its relatively large frontal area had been used. The discoid hull was also found to channel warp field flow across its upper surface towards the bussard ram scoops of the warp nacelles. This channeling effect improved field efficiency at all power levels and speeds. As the understanding of warp field mechanics was refined, the trend towards saucer-shaped primary hulls would be intensified in later Starfleet vessels.

In most respects, the Moskva class continued design and engineering trends established in the Comet and Daedalus classes introduced at the end of the Romulan War. As in these classes, ship functions were clearly divided between a command/crew hull and an engineering/propulsion hull. The bridge was returned to its customary position atop the command hull and the shuttlecraft bay was again placed in the secondary hull. The fusion reactor was centered along the longitudinal axis of the ship, and impulse thrust ports exited immediately in front of the warp bustle detachment seam.

Weaponry was the then-standard mix of fusion-warhead missiles and lasers. New to this class was an early type of ultraphased pulse laser cannon, two of which were mounted in the chin of the primary hull. Although the on-target energy output of this new weapon approached that of early phasers, its power requirement was higher and its range was substantially less. However, subsequent refinements lead to steady improvement and, ultimately, to the development of true phasers in 2202. Although Moskva -class ships were the first to be fitted with phasers in 2204, lasers were still carried by the Moskva class and later classes until the 2220s. Finally, warp capability was supplied by the long-awaited Hiryu mark III drive units.

The first ship of the new class, USS  Moskva (NCC-374), entered service with Starfleet in April 2179. An additional 30 ships (NCC-375 to NCC-404) joined the fleet through 2183. Moskva -class ships gained immediate popularity with officers and crews. First, total laser firepower was increased some 75% over that in the preceding Wasp class. Second, because the ship's mass was more equally distributed along the longitudinal axis than in the Wasp class, Moskva was significantly more maneuverable at both sublight and warp speeds. Finally, the more warp-dynamic design allowed greater cruising and maximum speeds.

The Moskva class had an outstanding safety record. No ships were lost because of mechanical failures. However, an incident occurred aboard USS  Johannesburg in 2186 when a faulty nacelle flow monitor falsely indicated a runaway positive feedback power loop within the plasma flow governor. Believing that a catastrophic warp core explosion was imminent, Chief Engineer Roberta Bocharnikov ordered the warp nacelles and warp bustle to be separated. Although unnecessary, these maneuvers were successful in causing the separated warp core to initiate its automatic shut-down routine. The warp core, nacelles, and the rest of the ship were towed to Starbase 13, where they were successfully re-mated. Despite her supreme embarrassment, Bocharnikov oversaw the reassembly and relaunching of Johannesburg and retained her position as chief engineer.

Although most ships of the Moskva class had left front-line service by 2215, some continued to serve as auxiliaries and training vessels until the 2240s. After retirement from active duty, Moskva -class ships were used as testbeds for many emerging technologies owing to the similarities of their layouts to those of succeeding classes. USS  Moskva was the site of the first successful ship-to-surface transport of a Human being in 2206, and USS  Gato was the first ship to fire photon torpedoes in 2214. In addition, Taurus -class tugs, which entered service in 2182, and Sanford -class repair tenders, which entered service in 2185, were derived from the Moskva class and used the same primary hull and warp drive assembly.

The Moskva -class cruiser USS  Aurora (NCC-377), a participant of the Battle of Eohippus IV, is on display at the Starfleet Museum.

Standard displacement: 67,750 t

Crew complement: 160 (27 officers + 133 crew) Weapons: 8 Type VI laser turrets (8 × 1 mounts), 2 Type VII laser cannons (fixed mounts), 2 missile launchers with 36 Spartak missiles Embarked craft: 4 medium cargo/personnel shuttlecraft, 2 light personnel shuttlecraft, 5 fighter/scouts Warp drive: SSWR-V-A spherical cavity M/AM reactor with 2 Hiryu III nacelles Velocity: wf 4.0, cruise; wf 5.0, supercruise; wf 5.2, maximum Units commissioned: 31

The Moscow Sessions Complete (3 disc set)