trek vs track

English for Students

• Confused Words
• What is NEW?
• Nursery Rhymes
• Beauties of English
• Intermediate Level
• Advanced English
• Plain English
• Your English Teacher
• Business Letters
• Difficult Words
• Social Letters
• Short Stories
• English Poems
• Poem Topics
• TOP 100 Poems
• English Songs
• Famous Quotations
• Business Dictionary

What is the difference between Track and Trek?

Popular pages.

• Privacy Policy

Chase the Midnight Sun: Iceland and Canada tours available now!

Hiking Vs Trekking

Learn the difference between hiking and trekking.

Hiking vs Trekking

• hiking vs trekking
• Benefits of hiking & trekking
• Beginner's guide to hike

EQUIPMENT LIST

Recommended tours, related blog posts.

Trekking and hiking are oftentimes used as synonyms, but is that correct? If you can’t answer with certainty, continue reading. Learn about hiking vs trekking and back up your enthusiasm for the outdoors with knowledge of the terms.

Hiking and trekking , two activities that most adventurers deeply enjoy. The two terms are used online interchangeably, as though it’s the same thing. But is it?

Not at all! Turns out, these are two very different activities. To clear things up, we crafted this hiking vs. trekking guide. In this guide, we’ll cover:

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HIKING AND TREKKING

Hiking   involves a long energetic walk in a natural environment on hiking trails or footpaths for a day or overnight.

Trekking   involves a long vigorous hike in wild natural environment for multiple days. It can be done off hiking trails.

WHAT ARE THE HEALTH BENEFITS OF HIKING AND TREKKING?

As well as fun and riveting, hiking and trekking can improve your mental and physical health. Here are just a few benefits of hiking and trekking:

1. IT LOWERS THE RISK OF HEART DISEASE AND IMPROVES YOUR BLOOD PRESSURE

Hiking and trekking are both amazing for your health!

A  study conducted by the CD C  recommends that you walk at least an hour a day, five days a week. This reduces the risk of you having a stroke in half!  Hiking and trekking regularly improves your heart and blood pressure, minimizing the chance of stroke. 

Keep that blood pumping!

2. BETTER OVERALL FITNESS.

These activities do amazing things to your muscles. Build up strength in your thighs, lower leg muscles, hip muscles and hamstrings.  It also builds your endurance. Hiking and trekking are both weight-bearing exercises, which build up bone density.  Trekking also boosts your core strength as you hike with a heavy backpack.

The more you do, the more your overall strength and fitness improves.

3. IMPROVES YOUR MENTAL HEALTH.

Get away from the stress of everyday life and escape to the outdoors.  Stress, depression and anxiety have a way of building up when you’re cooped up indoors too long.  Hitting the trail helps to put your life in perspective and take your mind off your worries.

The world around you has a way of demanding your attention, which can ease any stress you may have built up.

4. HIKING AND TREKKING BURNS CALORIES.

Looking to lose weight? Or tone your muscles? Forget the gym and hit the trail instead.

Hiking burns between 440 and 550 calories per hour according to  Livestrong research . Imagine how many calories will an overnight hike or a week-long trek burn. Burning calories helps you lose weight and tone your muscles.

5. IT MAKES YOU CREATIVE.

On top of all the physical and mental boosts, hiking and trekking can also make you more creative. It’s true! Spending time outdoors and soaking all the Vitamin D from the sunlight can improve your mind. Vitamin D, “the sunshine vitamin,” increases attention span, and improves our ability to focus. Put a creative spin on our problem-solving skills.

Vitamin D is also great for maintaining healthy bones and teeth, supporting your immune system and boosting cardiovascular health.

BEGINNER'S GUIDE TO HIKING: WHERE DO I START?

Convinced you need to do more hiking? Here are a few tips on where to start:

• Start with day hikes. If you want to get out there more, start with day hikes. Spend an afternoon strolling around your local park, or drive to the closest forest for an afternoon hike. Make this your routine and increase the length and amount of hikes you take over time.
• Join your local hiking community. While hiking on your own can be very inspirational and spiritualizing, it often gives very little motivation to get out there again, especially on longer hikes. By joining your local hiking community, you’ll meet like-minded people, who will hike with you and motivate you to keep on hiking. 
• Go on an overnight hike. Grab a friend and go on an overnight hike with a tent and a sleeping bag. Test your physical condition by hiking for 5 hours and see if you’re ready to try trekking.
• Get proper hiking boots . If you feel like longer forms of hiking are for you, get some proper hiking boots, a durable tent and a warm sleeping bag with pad. Your hiking boots should be waterproof with a good sole and ankle support. Properly wear them in before a long-distance hike.

Go on a trek . Once you’ve been on a few overnight hikes and got the necessary hiking gear, go on a multi-day trek . Join one of our awesome hiking tours exploring the Icelandic Highlands .

Good quality hiking and trekking equipment is essential. High-quality equipment will allow you to enjoy your hikes and treks even more and stay safe and warm no matter the weather!

Here’s a list of equipment that is worth the investment:

• Hiking boots. For short day hikes, comfortable sneakers might do it but for longer overnight hikes good hiking shoes or boots are essential. For trekking, you might want to think about boots with ankle support. Don’t forget to wear in your shoes before you go on a hike. Read more about the best hiking shoes and boots here .
• A backpack. For day hikes, a light day backpack with a hydration pack is perfect. For longer hikes and treks, where you need to carry your food and tent, a 50-60L backpack should suffice. Make sure it has a waist belt and adjustable back support.
• A tent . Your accommodation for the duration of your trip should be sturdy. If you intend to hike during warmer seasons, a 3 season tent will do, yet if you plan to hike during winter, make sure your tent has a skirt and can withstand wind, rain, and snow.
• A sleeping bag. When buying a sleeping bag, adhere to the comfort temperatures provided by the manufacturer. Usually, there are three numbers: comfort, limit, and extreme. Comfort is the temperature at which a female will rest comfortably, limit - a male comfort temperature, extreme - the lowest temperature at which female will be able to sleep for 6 hours without the risk of hypothermia.

Compass, maps, and a GPS device. Before you go on any hiking trip , make sure you have a detailed map of the area. For longer treks, it’s good to have a GPS device or a compass too. Make sure you know how to use them.

Best Sellers

Landmannalaugar hiking tour from Reykjavik

Kerlingarfjöll Hiking Tour from Reykjavík

4-Day Laugavegur Trek Tour

Iceland Ring Road Itinerary

The Best Geothermal Pools in Iceland

Glacier Activities Not To Miss This Winter

9 Arctic Animals You Can See in the North

Top Places To Visit Near the Arctic Circle for Wellness Travel

Top Things to Do in Nunavut

Laugavegur Trail - 6 Days Hiking Tour in Iceland

The Ultimate List of the Best Hikes in Iceland

Day hikes and multi-day treks in iceland from hiking experts and mountain guides.

Imagine that you’re standing on a grand mountain in the middle of the Icelandic wilderness. Everywhere you look are colorful hills, snow-capped peaks, moss-covered slopes, jagged glaciers, majestic waterfalls, and rumbling volcanoes. And yo...

The 21 Best Day Hikes in the World

The most beautiful single-day hikes around the globe, hand picked by our hiking experts.

If you have a bucket list of hikes to complete, the best day hikes in the world should be on it. Venture out of your comfort zone by exploring the best Mother Earth has to offer. Some of these hikes are extremely challenging while some aren...

The 21 Best Hikes in the World

The best long-distance hikes in the world, hand picked by our hiking experts.

What better way to explore the breathtaking nature of our planet than on a thrilling nature hike. From the volcanic passes of Iceland to the tropical rainforest of Peru, our expert guides have compiled a list of the 21 best treks in the wor...

Get exclusive deals and a taste of Iceland, Canada, Scandinavia & Baltic States straight to your inbox

Hiking vs trekking: what’s the difference and does it matter?

We explore the definitions and characteristics of hiking vs trekking so you know just what kind of adventure you’re going on, and how to plan for it

In the outdoor world, the terms hiking and trekking are often used interchangeably, but do they actually mean the same thing? After all, there are any number of synonyms for hiking, from hillwalking and rambling to strolling and sauntering, so is a trek just another word for walking in nature? We take a look at the definitions and characteristics of hiking vs trekking so you know just what kind of adventure you’re going on, and how to plan for it. 

What is the difference between trekking and hiking? 

Hiking and trekking both describe walking in the outdoors, usually wearing hiking boots , so how different can they really be? The official definition of trekking is a long and arduous journey, especially one on foot. The word comes from a South African Dutch word “trakk” meaning “to pull or travel”. Meanwhile, hiking is defined as the activity of going for long walks, especially across country, and its origins are unknown.

So is the difference just semantics? In modern usage, at least, hiking and trekking do describe different activities, although the markers are all rather subjective. We took a closer look at the differences between hiking vs trekking and unearthed five key differences separating these two activities.

Hiking vs trekking: distance 

If you look at the definitions of hiking and trekking, they are both unhelpfully described as “long”. Asking the question “how long is a hike?” is a bit like asking “how long is a piece of string?” After all, as you probably know, when you set off on a hike it will be as long as it takes you to complete it, really. But even though there isn’t a specified distance that makes a hike a hike and a trek a trek, there is some difference here, albeit subjective difference.

A hike is going to be the shorter of the two, and general agreement is that if you can do it in a day, it’s a hike. For some of us though, the most we can walk in a day is five miles and for others, it’s close to 30. And some mountains that involve a little over a mile of steep climbing definitely still feel very much like a hike. Complicating matters further, if you do a one-night backpacking trip with a day of walking on either side, it’s still considered a hike. In fact, you could do a two or three-night trip and it might still be a hike. The question gets even trickier to answer when you ask what denotes a thru-hike .

Trekking, on the other hand, always involves travelling long distances. A trek in the Himalayas might cover over 100 miles for example. The definition of a long distance will vary between a novice and an ultra-runner, but for the sake of drawing a line somewhere, let’s just say that once you start getting up above the 40-mile mark, you’re more likely on a trek than a hike. 

Hiking vs trekking: duration 

This one ties in with distance. Regardless of your pace, the further you go, the longer it will take you. Given what we said about the distance of hikes, a hike could presumably take you anywhere from an hour or two to several days. If we go by the very unofficial definition that a trek is 40 miles or more, well that could take the average hiker 4-5 days to complete, but again, someone else might be able to finish in two days. So again, there isn’t a strict definition here, but if it takes you more than a couple of days, it’s probably a trek. 

Advnture Newsletter

All the latest inspiration, tips and guides to help you plan your next Advnture!

Hiking vs trekking: destination 

Next up, we’ve got the question of destination. As you know, hiking doesn’t have to involve a specific destination. You might well go to a mountain top, a lake or a waterfall but none of these features defines a hike, they just make it more scenic. As long as it’s taking place outside in nature, it’s a hike. 

So what about trekking? In modern usage, trekking does usually denote some type of special destination, whether that’s the two-week walk to Everest Base Camp or a 500 mile pilgrimage on El Camino de Santiago. There isn’t always a spiritual significance – treks can indeed be done purely for enjoyment – but there is usually a significance more than just popping up the hills out your back door. 

That said, you could walk to the summit of the legendary Mount Shasta for spiritual reasons and call it a pilgrimage, but at 10 miles it wouldn’t count as a trek, so destination only counts so far as distance when it comes to delineating a hike from a trek.

Hiking vs trekking: terrain 

Now we can all agree that hikes and treks occur in the outdoors and in natural, not urban, environments. So is there any difference between the types of terrain you cover in hiking vs trekking?

In modern usage, hiking typically takes place on trails and footpaths. Trekking can also take place on a designated trail – the 2,200 mile Appalachian Trail is a great example – but may involve terrain where there are no trails, through the jungles of northern Thailand or across the Sahara would be extreme examples.

Once again, this classification also depends on distance, since you might have a nearby mountain that you love to walk up that has no official trail, but if it’s just a few miles you wouldn’t call it a trek just due to the lack of footpath.

Hiking vs trekking: enjoyment 

Now the enjoyment factor might be the most subjective category of all, but it’s one worth considering when it comes to hiking vs trekking. Though it might not be part of its official definition, hiking usually denotes a level of pleasure, versus doing something for material gain or to achieve a certain goal. If you recall though, trekking by definition is “arduous” meaning it will always be difficult and tiring. That’s not to say that you won’t enjoy elements of a trek, but at times it is likely to be harrowing. 

Hikes can be arduous too of course, which you’ll know if you’ve tackled a Colorado 14er , but by definition they don’t have to be. You can stroll a gentle three-mile loop along a babbling brook in a meadow of wildflowers and it’s still a hike. If you’re trekking and not suffering a little, you’re either doing it wrong or you’ve achieved nirvana. 

It seems like the biggest delineating factor between hiking and trekking comes down to the time it takes and distance covered, with some more nuanced possibilities coming into play like terrain, purpose and the enjoyment level, but why does all of this even matter?

Ultimately, the difference for you is knowing what kind of training, preparation and gear you’re likely to need. By now, you won’t be surprised to hear that there’s not a set gear list for a hike versus a trek, but for an easy day hike you might just need your best hiking shoes , a water bottle and a small daypack . For a longer hike, you’d want to start thinking about proper boots, a layering system and a tent . Basically, it depends on the distance you’re covering and the season and weather, but you can read more in our article on What to wear hiking . You might need to train for a longer hike, but for most, you can just do your training on the trail and turn around when you get tired. 

For trekking, it’s a bit more clear that you will need to train in advance , plan your journey and, unless you’ve got Sherpas, carry everything you need from a camping stove to a good one-person tent in a large backpack . After all, it’s going to be arduous and you want the best gear possible to lighten your load. 

Julia Clarke is a staff writer for Advnture.com and the author of the book  Restorative Yoga for Beginners . She loves to explore mountains on foot, bike, skis and belay and then recover on the the yoga mat. Julia graduated with a degree in journalism in 2004 and spent eight years working as a radio presenter in Kansas City, Vermont, Boston and New York City before discovering the joys of the Rocky Mountains. She then detoured west to Colorado and enjoyed 11 years teaching yoga in Vail before returning to her hometown of Glasgow, Scotland in 2020 to focus on family and writing.  

"There is nothing you can do to guarantee your safety" – college student's tragic death highlights the dangers of hiking Half Dome

Hoka is holding a big sale on some of its best trail running shoes right now, including $46 off this top-rated model

Finisterre reveals refresh of two classic Gregory backpack designs

Most Popular

• 2 "There is nothing you can do to guarantee your safety" – college student's tragic death highlights the dangers of hiking Half Dome
• 3 Hoka is holding a big sale on some of its best trail running shoes right now, including $46 off this top-rated model
• 4 Inspired by the Olympic climbing? Here’s how to get started
• 5 Man suffers full-thickness burns on his feet after losing his shoes in the dunes of Death Valley

Trek vs. Track — What's the Difference?

Difference Between Trek and Track

Table of contents, key differences, comparison chart, environment, primary purpose, required equipment, compare with definitions, common curiosities, what is a trek, what is a track, are tracks always circular, what equipment is necessary for a trek, what are the physical demands of a trek versus using a track, can children participate in treks, what kind of wildlife might one encounter on a trek, how long does a typical trek last, how does one prepare for a trek, is a track suitable for daily exercise, can tracks be found in natural settings, what are the common uses of a track in sports, can treks be done in urban areas, what are the safety considerations for using a track, how are tracks maintained, share your discovery.

Author Spotlight

Popular Comparisons

Trending Comparisons

New Comparisons

Trending Terms

Cycling made Simple.

Made By Cyclists

Trek 7200 Multitrack Review

September 28, 2023

‍ Key Takeaways

• Trek 7200 Multitrack has a versatile aluminum frame suitable for various terrains.
• It has an efficient 3x8-speed drivetrain for smooth gear transitions.
• It offers an affordable price point without compromising on performance.
• It’s an ideal choice for riders seeking an environmentally conscious bike.

‍ Cruise through bike options confidently! Our Trek 7200 Multitrack review equips you with all the details you need for a thrilling and satisfying ride.

The Trek 7200 Multitrack is well-regarded for its lightweight aluminum frame, high-quality components, and budget-friendly price tag. Riders have praised the ease of use, comfortable saddle for long rides, and wide gear range in this model.

As a seasoned expert in the biking community, I’m committed to delivering unbiased and well-researched insights about the Trek 7200 Multitrack. My passion for cycling ensures that I post accurate reviews that guide riders toward finding the perfect ride in the Trek 7200 Multitrack. With this guide, you can confidently decide whether the Trek 7200 Multitrack is the right hybrid bike for you.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

‍ Trek 7200 Multitrack Overview

The Trek 7200 Multitrack is a popular hybrid bike model that combines the best features of road and mountain bikes to provide a versatile and comfortable experience.

A main selling point of the Trek 7200 Multitrack is its lightweight aluminum frame and high-quality components, which are easy on the wallet without compromising performance.

Note that this bike does not have a bell as a standard feature. However, cyclists consider it as a safety add-on item. It's available in multiple colors, allowing riders to choose their preferred color options.

You can purchase it from your local seller or online retailers like eBay.

Key Components and Details

Here, we’ll explore the key components of the Trek 7200, focusing on its frame and suspension, wheels and tires, and handlebars and seat. These elements contribute to a comfortable and smooth ride, making the Trek 7200 an ideal choice for those looking for a dependable hybrid bike.

Frame and Suspension

The Trek 7200 Multitrack features an aluminum frame that is both lightweight and durable. It offers a comfortable and smooth ride with its suspension fork, available in various sizes, including 15", 17", and more.

The adjustable suspension handlebar Bontrager ensures you can customize your bike's performance to suit your specific needs better while benefiting from a comfortable and dependable design.

Wheels and Tires

The bike has high-quality, fast-rolling tires and wheels that provide a reliable and smooth ride over various terrains. The puncture-resistant 700 x 35c tires ensure you can keep going without worrying about a flat, and the Bontrager Invert puncture-resistant tires provide additional protection and keep the tire in good shape.

Handlebars and Seat

The Trek 7200 Multitrack ensures rider comfort with its adjustable handlebars and plush saddle. The handlebars are made with a Bontrager-approved design, which prioritizes user comfort and easy maneuverability.

Additionally, the soft seat contributes to a comfortable ride, allowing you to enjoy long outings on your bike without discomfort. The adjusted stem adds another layer of customization, ensuring a perfect fit for every rider.

Also, it has a comfortable and adjustable seat post. The seat post can be tuned to fit different positions and riding styles when the bike is ridden on different terrains.

Riding Experience with the Trek 7200

The Trek 7200 offers a perfect balance between the characteristics of both mountain bikes and hybrid bikes, making it an ideal choice for those who want a comfortable ride for commuting and some off-road capabilities. Its head tube angle of 71.5° enhances its performance in climbing hills, giving riders more confidence when moving quickly on fast descents.

Additionally, the RST CT-COM C5 fork with 50 mm of travel ensures a smooth ride on various surfaces. It's well-suited for city biking, light trail riding, and commuting, making it a versatile option for experienced and beginner riders who want to learn biking.

However, it’s essential to note that the Trek 7200 is not designed for aggressive mountain biking and may not be the best choice for those seeking to leave the highway for a more extreme off-road experience.

Ergonomics and Rider Comfort

The Trek 7200 Multitrack is a popular classic all-around hybrid bike that offers riders both versatility and comfort, making it an excellent choice for various riding conditions.

One of the major strengths of the Trek 7200 Multitrack is its lightweight Alpha aluminum frame, which not only provides easy handling but also features a slightly steeper head tube angle for improved climbing and confidence during fast downhill rides. With an emphasis on comfort, the bike's geometry is designed to ensure a relaxed and enjoyable ride.

Also, this bike has been praised for its ability to accommodate various body sizes and riding styles. Its easy-shifting gears and responsive sealed brakeset Tektro offer smooth operation and increased control while navigating bumpy roads and potholes.

Comparative Analysis

Compared to the Trek 7100 , the Trek 7200 Multitrack has a slightly better drivetrain, boasting a 3x8-speed system over the 3x7-speed system of the 7100. This provides a wider gear range, allowing for easier uphill climbs and smoother riding on various terrains.

Additionally, the Trek 7200 and 7100 are affordable options, making them accessible to riders on a budget.

When compared to other bikes in its class, the Trek 7200 Multitrack holds its own in terms of value and performance. The bike offers a comfortable riding experience with its lightweight frame and wide gear range for versatile cycling on different surfaces.

However, it’s worth noting that some bikes may come with upgraded components, like disc brakes and semi-cartridge bearings used in the hub or bottom bracket, providing better braking performance in wet conditions.

Here is a comparison table of the key functions and specifications of the Trek 7200 Multitrack and its competitor:

As a bike enthusiast, I understand the importance of durability in choosing the right bike. We'll discuss the Trek 7200 Multitrack's durability, and build quality, including its Alpha White Aluminum frame, Tig-welded construction, and 3x7 drivetrain.

Trek 7200 Multitrack is a reliable, durable bike requiring easy, cost-effective maintenance. Its quality components contribute to its overall performance and longevity, making it a great choice for riders seeking comfort and durability.

The bike's Alpha White Aluminum frame offers lightweight, sturdy construction and exceptional corrosion resistance, ensuring a long-lasting and dependable ride. Also, you can mount bottle cages on the frame's edge to hold your water bottle.

The Tig-welded construction guarantees strong and reliable joints, further enhancing its durability. In addition, the 3x7 drivetrain from Shimano Alivio ensures smooth gear shifting and dependable performance on various terrains.

The bike’s drivetrain works with the chainguard cassette and the rear derailleur to provide a range of gear rations.

Benefits and Drawbacks

As mentioned, the Trek 7200 Multitrack is a solid hybrid bike that offers a lightweight aluminum frame, easy shifting, and a comfortable 50 mm travel fork, which is more than adequate for its primary purpose as a versatile bike for both on- and off-road exploration.

Also, the head tube angle of 71.5° provides riders with climbing efficiency and added confidence on fast downhill roads.

However, you should know a few downsides to the Trek 7200 Multitrack. Some users have noted the need to replace the stock seat with a more comfortable one to improve the overall riding experience.

The bike may also be less suitable for heavy-duty off-road excursions or hardcore mountain biking, but it is often an excellent choice for casual riders who want to traverse both paved roads and light trails.

Pricing and Resale Value

When considering the purchase of a Trek 7200 Multitrack hybrid bike, it's essential to know the pricing details and the resale value should you ever decide to sell the bike.

The Trek 7200 Multitrack hybrid bike generally falls within a budget-friendly range, with prices typically below $500. For the best deals on a Trek 7200, it's worth checking out from retailers and authorized dealerships.

Determining the resale value of a bicycle can be tricky; it depends on factors such as the bike's age, condition, and demand in the market. A practical guide for establishing the resale value of Trek bikes is to check completed listings on online retailers to find the final prices paid for similar bicycles.

With its budget-friendly pricing and reliable aluminum frame, the Trek 7200 Multitrack is an attractive option for those looking to invest in a quality hybrid bike without breaking the bank.

Environmental Sustainability of the Trek 7200 Multitrack

As a cycling enthusiast, I've always been curious about the environmental impact of my bikes. In this section, we'll delve into the environmental sustainability aspect of the Trek 7200 Multitrack.

This bike has received some attention, and as an environmentally conscious individual, I need to know how green the production and distribution process is. So, let's dive in and see how Trek as a company is committed to the environment.

In recent years, Trek has made significant strides in implementing eco-friendly initiatives in the manufacturing and distributing of their bikes, including the 7200 Multitrack. Their commitment to green practices makes them a reliable brand for environmentally aware customers who prioritize sustainability.

Also, Trek is known for its innovative and progressive approach toward environmental sustainability. The company has a reputation for researching and utilizing environmentally friendly materials in production, adopting energy-efficient manufacturing processes, and implementing recycling programs to minimize waste.

This dedication has earned them a trustworthy and authoritative position within the cycling industry when it comes to sustainability.

10 Offbeat Cycling Competitions Across the Globe

10 Must-Visit Bicycle Museums Worldwide

10 Hidden Alley Bike Tours in Historic Cities

10 Bicycle Accessories That Went Viral

This article may contain affiliate links where we earn a commission from qualifying purchases. The images and content on this page may be created by, or with the assistance of, artificial intelligence, and should be used for entertainment and informational purposes only.

About THE AUTHOR

Danny Lawson

Mountain biking is more than just a hobby for me - it's a way of life. I love the challenge and excitement that comes with it, and I'm always pushing myself to go faster and ride harder. Some people might think that mountain biking is dangerous, but I see it as the only way to live.

Trending Now

The Top 10 Toughest Hill Climbs in Road Cycling

The 10 Most Influential Bicycle Races in History

The 10 Best Bicycle Cafes in Asia

10 Most Bizarre Cycling Laws Around the World

About PedalChef

PedalChef is a blog on all things cycling. We are a group of people who love bikes, and we want to share the joy that comes with the experience. You can read more about us here .

©2024 PedalChef. All rights reserved.

We can be reached at [email protected]

PedalChef.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon. This site also participates in other affiliate programs, and is compensated for referring traffic and business to these companies.

• Home  / 
• Cross Country Shoes  / 

Cross Country vs Track Running: What’s the Difference?

Those not into the sport look at cross country vs track as one and the same. Both involve running.

For passionate runners, though, these two are very different from one another.

A lot of people don’t have an idea about the difference between cross country and track. Hence, the ton of confusion and misconceptions about these two running sports.

So, what is the difference between track and cross country? That is what we will talk about today.

Cross Country vs Track

Track vs country: which is more challenging between these two? To know the answer, let’s first define each one of these athletic sports.

Cross Country Running

Cross-country running is one of the disciplines under the athletic sports category where participants run on natural grass or dirt terrain.

Competitors in cross country running are also called harriers. They can participate as individual contenders or part of a team of six to seven people.

The cross country running season usually happens during autumn and winter, but most athletes train the whole year-round.

Track or Distance Running

Track or distance running includes short distance sprints, middle distance runs, marathons or long-distance runs, hurdles, and relay races.

Most track runners also participate in different field contests consisting of competitions like jumping and throwing events.

Difference Between Cross Country and Track

The only common thing about these two sports is running. All other aspects differ entirely from the other.

We keep on mentioning that there’s a difference between track vs cross country, so here are where you’ll find the disparities:

The first difference is the kind of events these two sports have.

Cross Country

There are two different types of cross country races. The first one is the smaller competitions between teams competing for the state or conference championships.

Collegiate men compete for eight- or 10-kilometer races, while their female counterparts run for five or six kilometers.

High school runners usually participate in five-kilometer races, and middle-school competitors typically run 2.4- or 3.2-kilometer courses.

Then, there’s the more massive invitational event, an open competition for any team or individual participant who does not belong to any group.

Senior competitors for the international category run for a 10-kilometer course for both men and women.

It’s an eight-kilometer race for the men’s junior division, while women runners compete for a six-kilometer course.

Track or distance running events have more options where various athletes can specialize and participate in.

Sprint running is a short-distance race where runners need to run at their fastest speed throughout the required distance.

Runners should run anywhere from 100 to 400 meters to win the competition.

• Middle Distance

Middle-distance running is also part of track running events but with different lengths from sprint.

The usual race lengths for this category are 800 and 1,500 meters.

• Long Distance

Long-distance running, also called endurance running, has a running distance of 3,000 meters.

Another part of long-distance running is a sport called steeplechase.

Athletes  participating in this competition need to conquer the racecourse, usually with a distance of 3,000 and 10,000 meters and obstacles here and there.

Marathons are also under long-distance running.

Runners competing in this category need to conquer a 42.2-kilometer long course usually done on city roads.

Hurdling is a track sport that combines running and jumping over barriers while maintaining your running speed.

The typical hurdle race length differs between men and women, which are 110 and 100  meters long, respectively.

A 400-meter hurdle is also open for both genders.

Relay running is part of track running, too, and is where participants compete as a team.

Two of the most popular relay races are the 100 and 400 meters played by four athletes.

An essential feature of the relay race is the baton, as it is passed on from the first player to the next after completing their part.

2. Race Venue

Races for these two sports are done in entirely different settings, as well.

The event organizers for cross country races design their racecourses in open areas. The natural terrain is usually covered in dirt and grass.

The additional excitement of not knowing what to expect from the racecourse is part of what makes this sport interesting.

There’s variety in every race, as it is held in different outdoor locations.

Track running is more straightforward. Runners will always compete on a flat, red-colored race track wherever the location is.

It may be an indoor or outdoor event, but it will always be on a uniformed racetrack.

3. Number of Participants

There is a big difference between the number of competitors for each sport type.

A lot of runners compete in a single race at the same time in cross country events.

Members from each team assemble at the starting line. A race official will give the signal, and all the participants will run at the same time.

In track running, runners typically compete against eight or nine contestants at the same time.

This limited number is because race tracks only have a limited number of lanes that players can occupy.

4. Race Duration

The time spent on each sports event also differs immensely.

Runners in cross country races only compete for a single race per category. Hence, there’s a shorter competition, no matter the distance.

Track running events, on the other hand, takes longer since there are various events that players participate in.

5. Training

Both cross country and track require intensive training so that the runners can handle the actual race challenges and succeed.

The mental strength of all the runners is essential for both sports. However, they each have different training strategies.

In cross country training, all runners follow the same workouts, primarily because they will run on the same racecourse.

They usually train in natural surroundings similar to the racecourse where they will compete.

Cross country runners train their minds as much as their bodies so that they can conquer the uneven racecourse while maintaining a steady running pace.

In track training, runners keep their focus on reaching their time goals and enhancing their specialties.

Track runners train to build their endurance to conquer different race distances.

1. Which is better cross country or track?

This question will get a mixture of answers as runners will prefer one from the other.

In the end, it would really depend on the athlete’s preference.

For cross country athletes, leg speed is not as important as a strategy while handling all the racecourse obstacles.

As athletes admit, it’s hard to master cross country running since racecourses differ in every competition.

Track runners, on the other hand, specialize in a particular category and do specific training to master it.

If an athlete wants to excel in a particular sport, they will consider track better than cross country.

It would also mean that they only compete with players that are as skilled as they are.

2. Is cross country harder than track?

The simple answer to this question is yes.

As we have been mentioning, cross country racecourses differ in every event, thus making it harder to maneuver and complete.

3. Why cross country is the hardest sport?

In cross country races, athletes compete as a team. However, every member needs to exert individual efforts to complete the race.

Never knowing what to expect as you start the race adds to this sport’s challenge and excitement.

Track vs Cross Country

So, what is the difference between track and cross country? A lot. We have discussed different aspects of each sport, proving that running is their only similarity.

Whichever sport you choose between cross country vs track, we all know that they all require endurance and speed.

Now that you know how they differ, perhaps you’re interested in learning which is better between trail running vs road running ?

Trek Bikes - The world's best bikes and cycling gear

Wherever you buy, we'll take care of you

Buy in-store or online. Pick up your bike at your local Trek shop or get it delivered right to your front door.

• EASY SHOPPING OPTIONS

If you're not in love with your bike, we'll take it back within 30 days with no additional charge.

Your local shop has the knowledge, products, and expertise to help you get the most out of your new bike.

• FIND A RETAILER

“Our mission is to provide incredible hospitality, and the entire team is here to give you the absolute best experience. That’s what we do. Whatever you need, we’ll take care of you.”

– Laurie Koch, VP of Customer Care

We’re changing the world through bikes

Used bikes, certified awesome by Trek

Red Barn Refresh, where pre-owned bikes get another chance to ride.

No time to waste

We’re changing the business of bikes

Trek is a 2024 Fortune 100 Best Company to Work For!

Looking for a great place to work.

Our mission Trek started in a small Wisconsin barn in 1976, but our founders always saw something bigger. Decades later, we're on a mission to make our world a better place to live and ride. We build only products we love, provide incredible hospitality to our customers, and change the world by getting more people on bikes.

Trek 7200 Hybrid Bike: Our In-Depth Review

Looking for a versatile and reliable bike that can handle both smooth roads and rocky terrains? You should consider the Trek 7200.

Trek 7200 is a versatile and powerful bike that can handle a variety of terrains, making it a great choice for commuting and casual riders. 

In this review, we’ll be examining the bike’s features, design, and performance to help you determine if it is the right fit for your cycling needs. 

So, let’s dive into the Trek 7200 hybrid bike review!

Trek 7200 At A Glance

The Trek 7200 hybrid bike is a versatile and comfortable bike that performs well on both smooth and rough terrain. 

It features a soft and comfortable seat, a lightweight frame that can withstand any terrain, and a reliable fork that offers stability. With a wide gear range and powerful brakes, this bike is perfect for tackling any terrain. 

It also comes with high-quality components that make for a smooth and enjoyable ride. If you’re looking for a bike that can handle anything and still be comfortable, the Trek 7200 is an excellent choice.

• Lightweight aluminum frame
• High-quality components
• Budget-friendly price tag
• Comfy saddle for long rides
• Wide gear range
• Plastic pedals are not durable
• Saddle may be too soft

Related Post: 15 Best Hybrid Bikes Under $500 in 2023 + Buying Guide

Trek 7200 Review: Features and Specifications

Frame and fork.

When it comes to biking, having a sturdy and reliable frame is key. This is no surprise since the frame is the backbone of the bike and can make a huge difference in terms of stability and control while you’re riding.

For the Trek 7200, you get a solid hybrid bike frame. This bike is made with Trek’s Alpha aluminum, which is known for its lightweight and durability. You’ll feel the difference as soon as you start pedaling, it’s that light!

What’s really cool about the Trek 7200 is its slightly steeper head tube angle of 71.5°. This makes it perfect for climbing hills and gives riders more confidence and balance on fast descents. You’ll be able to handle any terrain with ease!

And for the fork, the Trek 7200 is equipped with an RST CT-COM C5 fork with 50 mm of travel. For a hybrid bike like this, that’s more than enough. 

While suspension isn’t usually a top priority for hybrid bikes, the suspension on the Trek 7200 is designed to absorb the bumps of trails and potholes with ease.

Finally, let’s not forget about comfort! As a hybrid bike, the main focus of the Trek 7200 is on providing comfortable rides. 

You’ll appreciate the suspension and enjoy smooth rides even on rough terrain, and you’ll feel like you’re gliding on air on paved roads and smooth city streets.

Gears and Brakes

Gears are one of the most important components of any bike, as they can make a huge difference in how easy or difficult it is to ride.

Luckily, the Trek 7200 has got you covered with high-quality components from Shimano, SRAM, and Bontrager. These components provide precise shifting and braking, making for smooth and safe rides.

One of the best things about the Trek 7200 is its 8-speed rear gear. This provides a wide gear range that’s perfect for both commuting, riding around your neighborhood or even taking on rough trails. 

You’ll always have the perfect gear to make the ride easy and enjoyable, whether on climbs or descents.

If you’re looking at an earlier model of the Trek 7200, you might find it fitted with 7-speed SRAM MRX Plus shifters and Shimano C102 front derailleur and Shimano Acera rear derailleur. 

But in the later 2010 model, these components were upgraded to SRAM MRX Comp twist shifters, Shimano M191 front derailleur, and Shimano Alivio rear derailleur. 

Either way, you can be sure you’re getting top-notch components that will give you efficient rides.

Now, let’s talk about the brakes. The Trek 7200 comes with Tektro linear-pull alloy brakes. These brakes are powerful and efficient, giving you the stopping power you need to stay safe on any ride. You’ll be able to stop quickly and easily, even when you’re gliding down a steep hill.

Wheels and Tires

Wheels and tires are crucial components of any bike, as they contribute to its overall performance and riding experience.

The Trek 7200 comes with a high-quality set of wheels, including an alloy front hub and a Shimano RM30 rear hub. 

The Bontrager 750 rims have 32 holes and are more than strong enough for most commuters. These wheels are both durable and lightweight, and won’t weigh you down.

Trek 7200 has very solid tires, but depending on which model of the Trek 7200 you have, you may be riding on different tires. 

The earlier models were equipped with Bontrager Invert Puncture Resistant tires, while the later 2010 model has 700x35c Bontrager H2 Plus tires with a puncture-resistant belt.

No matter which tires you have, you can expect good traction on smooth surfaces. However, on rougher terrain, the tires may not perform as well. That being said, the tires are puncture-resistant and should withstand most road hazards.

Saddle and Handlebars

The Trek 7200 comes with a soft and padded Bontrager Boulevard saddle that is perfect for long-distance commutes. What’s even better is that the saddle is attached to an alloy seatpost with adjustable suspension. 

This means that your seatpost is more flexible, reducing the transfer of high-frequency road vibrations from your bike to your body. It also helps dampen the impacts of big hits from the road, making your ride smoother and more comfortable.

Also, the Trek 7200 comes with a Bontrager Approved handlebar made of solid steel and with a 50 mm rise. 

You can always adjust the height of the handlebar to give you a comfortable fit. This means that you can ride for longer without experiencing any discomfort or strain on your back or shoulders.

Size and weight 

When it comes to finding the perfect fit for your ride, the Trek 7200 hybrid bike has many sizes to choose from. With sizes ranging from 15″ to 25″, you’re sure to find the size that fits you just right. 

The frame sizes are precisely 15, 17.5, 20, 22.5, and 25 inches, giving you plenty of options to choose from.

And even with all the high-quality components, the Trek 7200 still manages to keep its weight down. With an average weight of about 26.4 lbs (11.9 kg), this bike is easy to handle and maneuver on the trails. 

It’s not too heavy to carry around when you need to, but it’s still sturdy enough to support riders up to 275 to 300 lbs.

How much is the Trek 7200 Multitrack?

The current Trek 7200 value is estimated to be less than $100, you will most likely find one going from $65 to $110. But, keep in mind that it would be a used bike. 

If you happen to find a brand-new Trek 7200, though this is very unlikely, expect the price to be from $250 to $450. It doesn’t go over $500.

Related Post: 11 Best Commuter Bikes Under $200 in 2023

Best Trek 7200 Alternatives on Amazon

• Schwinn Suburban

Schwinn Suburban is a hybrid bike that offers comfort and versatility with an adjustable seat and handlebars. 

It has a steel frame, 26″ wheels, a reliable drivetrain, and aluminum linear-pull rim brakes for precise braking. 

You’ll also get a suspension fork, 7-speed shifters, and Shimano rear derailleurs. The Suburban is great for commuting and has a plush saddle for a comfortable ride.

• Sixthreezero Around the Block

The SixThreeZero Around the Block has a robust and simple appearance, with a weight limit of 300 lbs and a height range of 5 to 6 feet tall. 

Its 17-inch steel frame and aluminum wheels provide a smooth and comfortable ride with outstanding traction when braking. 

The bike’s foam grips on the handlebars allow for an upright riding position. And the coaster brakes are acceptable for commuting and casual use.

• Schwinn Sanctuary

The Schwinn Sanctuary Bike has a durable steel frame and 2.1-inch wide tires for a smooth ride, and weighs 38.8 lbs with a 225-pound weight limit. 

It features a 7-speed twist shifter, swept back handlebars, front and rear alloy linear pull brakes, and a limited lifetime warranty. 

It’s ideal for riders between 64 and 74 inches tall, it’s suitable for leisurely cycling experiences on paved roads or the beach.

Finally, is Trek 7200 bike a good buy?

Yes, Trek 7200 hybrid bike is an excellent choice for anyone looking for a reliable and versatile bike. It’s perfect for both commuting and light off-road riding. 

Its lightweight frame and reliable components make it a joy to ride, while the comfortable saddle and adjustable suspension help to ensure a smooth and comfortable ride. 

Whether you’re a beginner or an experienced rider, the Trek 7200 hybrid bike is definitely worth considering.

Can’t find the Trek 7200? Check out these great alternatives on Amazon

You may also like: 9 Best Commuter Bike Under $300 in 2023

Dial up your biking experience.

BikeCrunch’s content is for informational and educational purposes only.

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. However, this does not impact our reviews and comparisons. We try our best to keep things fair and balanced, in order to help you make the best choice for you.

© BikeCrunch

• More from M-W
• To save this word, you'll need to log in. Log In

Definition of trek

 (Entry 1 of 2)

intransitive verb

Definition of trek  (Entry 2 of 2)

• peregrinate
• peregrination

Examples of trek in a Sentence

These examples are programmatically compiled from various online sources to illustrate current usage of the word 'trek.' Any opinions expressed in the examples do not represent those of Merriam-Webster or its editors. Send us feedback about these examples.

Word History

Afrikaans, from Dutch trecken to pull, haul, migrate; akin to Old High German trechan to pull

Afrikaans, from Dutch treck pull, haul, from trecken

1835, in the meaning defined at sense 2

1849, in the meaning defined at sense 2

Dictionary Entries Near trek

Treitz's muscle

Cite this Entry

“Trek.” Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary , Merriam-Webster, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/trek. Accessed 26 Jul. 2024.

Kids Definition

Kids definition of trek.

Kids Definition of trek  (Entry 2 of 2)

from Afrikaans trek, "to travel by ox wagon," from Dutch trecken "to haul, pull"

More from Merriam-Webster on trek

Nglish: Translation of trek for Spanish Speakers

Britannica English: Translation of trek for Arabic Speakers

Subscribe to America's largest dictionary and get thousands more definitions and advanced search—ad free!

Can you solve 4 words at once?

Word of the day.

See Definitions and Examples »

Get Word of the Day daily email!

Popular in Grammar & Usage

Plural and possessive names: a guide, your vs. you're: how to use them correctly, every letter is silent, sometimes: a-z list of examples, more commonly mispronounced words, how to use em dashes (—), en dashes (–) , and hyphens (-), popular in wordplay, it's a scorcher words for the summer heat, flower etymologies for your spring garden, 12 star wars words, 8 words for lesser-known musical instruments, birds say the darndest things, games & quizzes.

Trek vs. Giant Bikes | The Ultimate Comparison Guide

Trek vs. Giant is a great bike rivalry that has benefited everyone who loves bikes. If you need to decide between the two, you will have to compare the components of their respective road bikes, gravel bikes, and e-bikes. Warranty and customer service also need to be discussed. Let’s do this.

When compared to each other, Trek vs. Giant bikes results in a pretty close race. Giant is generally cheaper with more high-quality components on their bikes, whereas Trek tends to be more innovative in its designs. Both brands deliver high-quality bikes in different categories.

It could be a difficult choice when you are in the bike shop, and you need to choose between a Trek or a Giant model. As I will explain in the article, Giant is generally cheaper, but if you’re looking for a high-performance bike, then Trek leads the way. Choosing one over the other is a win-win situation, as both brands are fantastic.

Trek vs. Giant: Product Range

Trek vs. giant: design, trek vs. giant: innovations, trek vs. giant: overall price, trek vs. giant: frame material, trek vs. giant: suspension and gears, trek vs. giant: brakes, trek vs. giant: pro-cycling wins, trek vs. giant road bikes: performance, trek vs. giant: e-bikes, trek vs. giant: gravel bikes, trek vs. giant mtb: performance, trek vs. giant: what their warranties cover, trek vs. giant: what their warranties don’t cover, trek vs. giant: customer service, trek vs. giant bikes: comparison.

Giant is the world’s largest manufacturer of bicycles, and Trek is the leader, most popular, and respected bike brand in the American market. Both of these bike manufacturers offer models in most categories, price points, catering for all types of cyclists.

When comparing Trek vs. Giant bikes, it’s like comparing Chevrolet and Ford vehicles. Both are hugely respected and liked brands, with solid reputations to boot. Ask a thousand people to choose between the brands, and it may be split down the middle of a clear win for one. 

Ask another thousand people, and the results could be different. I’m trying to get across that both brands are very well supported. There are some minor differences between the brands that can help you decide whether you want a Trek or a Giant bike.

As mentioned earlier in the article, Trek is the leader in the American market. They have the broadest range of bicycle options; whether you are looking for an entry-level bike or a high-performance bike used by professionals, Trek has you covered.

Giant also boasts an impressive selection of anything bike; however, they lack behind Trek in their product range. An interesting fact about Giant is that in some cases, they can manufacture bikes designed by competitor brands, as their team has excellent bike manufacturing facilities across the world.

Trek road bike designs are flashy and cutting edge, geared towards research and development, focused on making their bikes look and feel better when on the saddle. More people tend to go for a Trek Road bike when money isn’t a problem. 

Giant road bike designs are less flashy and more geared to adding quality parts to the design than turning heads on the road. Giant tend to merge the practicality of their bikes’ with added performance by going with their general design, whereas Trek’s models seem to be more streamlined every year.

Both brands have played an instrumental role in incorporating innovative ideas in bike manufacturing, changing the way we build and ride bikes.

Trek Innovations

Here are some of the revolutionary technologies developed by Trek over the years:

• OCLV Carbon
• Alpha Aluminum
• Active Braking Pivot 
• Full Floater
• Trek IsoSpeed 

Giant Innovations

Here are some of the innovative technologies developed by our friends at Giant:

• Compact Road Design 
• OverDrive 
• Comax Composite Technology  
• Maestro Suspension
• Dfuse Technology 

Both of these manufacturers have played a massive part in the evolution of the bicycle, and long may it continue.  

Today, both brands are still at the forefront of innovative designs, revolutionary accessories, and yearly improvements on the bikes we have grown to love. Deciding who gets your money may rest on what technologies are present in the model you’re looking at. 

Trek has proved its worth regarding the production of award-winning reliable racing bikes, where Giant is all about the comfort of the ride and producing affordable quality bikes for everyone.

Trek bikes are generally more expensive than Giant. The main reason for this is that Trek bikes are manufactured in the United States, where the components cost more than in Taiwan, where the components cost less.

Giant bikes are less expensive than Trek bikes, mainly because they are manufactured in Taiwan. The island contains a closely interweaved supply chain incorporated with mature manufacturing technology. 

The parts are cheaper, allowing Giant to add extra accessories within a reasonable price frame.

Everything is closely situated, from the suppliers to the OEM companies, this results in lead times in materials, manufacturing, and design being shortened. Giant differentiates itself from competitors that, from ideation to raw materials to the finished product, is all controlled in-house (whole process.)

Giant produces bikes almost half the time it would take in the United States and brings them to the market at a much lower cost . Lower cost, in this case, does not mean lower quality, as Giant prides itself on delivering quality products to the market at the best possible price.

With any product, the more expensive ones tend to be the best manufactured, best-performing ones. These bike brands offer some more affordable bikes and some pretty expensive ones.

Trek Road Bikes have been referred to as indestructible, and if you have ever owned one, this will make perfect sense to you. They use only the strongest OCLV Carbon fiber in constructing their road bikes.

Some of Trek’s models are made from Alpha Aluminium, and through the process of Hydro Foaming, creates a frame that’s not as stiff as aluminum frames of old, giving the frame:

• Reduced Weight
• Reduced Stiffness (in critical areas that produce a harsh ride quality)

Some of their frames are tested in wind tunnels to help with optimum aerodynamics, and they love to produce a stiff, typically rugged frame compared to that of the opposition.

When engineering quality carbon, it’s crucial to minimize voids – spaces between the layers of carbon that can compromise the frame’s durability and strength. Trek’s OCLV Carbon exceeds aerospace standards; your bike frame will literally survive when launched into space!

Giant Bike Frames are made from an Advanced Grade Composite (Raw carbon), which features an excellent stiffness-to-weight ratio, that is both light and highly durable.

For some models, they employ what they call Modified Monocoque Construction , where the front triangle is molded and assembled as one piece without reducing:

• The quality of the ride
• Strength of the frame
• Stiffness of the frame

Giant also produces frames from aluminum alloy, which is light in weight yet durable. However, these frames may need regular servicing to keep them in perfect condition and avoid rusting. 

One thing to remember is that Giant started as an OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer), making frames for their bikes, even some bikes for their competitors like Trek were their thing.

If your main aim is to enjoy the act of cycling, then a cheaper aluminum frame could work for you. If you aim to be super-competitive and train to win, you should spend your money on a carbon fiber frame.

Trek is a master when it comes to suspensions . Trek fits their models with the following suspension systems, each one playing a significant part in one of the essential areas of any bike, the suspension:

• Full Floater – This allows for an extraordinarily responsive and nimble suspension that gives you the feeling of bottomless travel.
• IsoSpeed – This road bike suspension system decouples the seat tube from the top tube, decreasing driver fatigue.
• RE:aktiv – This suspension system adapts to the terrain with affective dampening and low shaft velocity. 

Giant’s suspension systems are also top-notch and are of high-technological quality:

• Maestro Full Suspension – This suspension system is used on their mountain bikes; it utilizes four tactically placed pivot points connected to two linkages, creating a single floating point that minimizes suspension compression. 
• Flexpoint Suspension – A suspension system that offers the same benefits as a multi-link system without the added cost/need for regular maintenance.

In some of their higher-priced models, both Trek and Giant use SRAM RED eTap AXS Groupset, expect Shimano kits on the mid-range models. Trek uses higher gear ratios in their bikes, whereas Giant prefers to go with lower gear ratios in similar models.

Trek revolutionized the biking industry by releasing their patented  Active Braking Pivot or ABP system. Manufacturers struggled for years with breaks and the suspension system, as braking would lock up the suspension.

That was until Trek unleashed the ABP, which allowed the suspension system to function at its best while braking, resulting in:

• Less Unintentional Skidding
• Less Chatter
• Driver Confidence (On or off the brakes)

Trek and Giant Road bikes use hydraulic disc brakes on their road bikes , although you might find rim brakes on some older or specific models. Hydraulic disc brakes are a way more effective braking system and hardly get damaged when put to the test.

Both have a wide range of brakes that they use on different types of bikes, but it’s usually hydraulic for road bikes, which is considered the most efficient braking system available. 

If you are into competitive racing, you probably have a hero that you follow religiously. When looking at some pro-cycling wins for each of the respective brands, it looks like Trek nails it with regards to producing high-performance bikes in the pro-cycling circuit!

Trek vs. Giant Bikes: Road Bike 

When comparing two brands, it’s best to compare their top-of-the-range models with each other. Have you heard the saying that goes that you are only as good as your last bike?

When you compare Trek’s Émonda SLR 9 eTap vs. Giant’s Propel Advanced Pro Disc 1, the slight differences are usually found in the different technologies used by the specific manufacturer, a different part here or there, both bikes are of high-quality and worth the price.

Trek’s Émonda SLR 9 eTap won the Best Road Bike of The Year award, which comes as no surprise to Trek lovers.

Trek bikes are ideal for the serious, heavy-duty racer and heavier than the average rider. Trek is known for its superior rear suspension, making mincemeat any terrain without feeling bumps or ruts. 

When used in urban areas, giant road bikes are typically more geared for the average rider. Giant likes to give the user a very comfortable ride compared to a Trek bike where performance is everything, and people sometimes refer to Giant bikes as “souped-up” tourist bikes.

That being said, Giant is no slouch when it comes to producing high-end road bikes. They have been doing it for many years, maybe just not as regularly as Trek does.

Some manufacturers design e-bikes that use a twist throttle to engage the electronic drive system, where you are not required to pedal for the motor to engage, but not Trek or Giant. They only produce pedal-assist e-bikes that deliver power according to driver input.

You will notice that Trek has a wider variety of e-bikes models under each respective category, compared to Giant, servicing a larger consumer base:

• Verve+  
• Allant+ 
• Vale Go!  
• Powerfly Electric Mountain Bikes 
• Powerfly Equipped Electric Mountain Bikes 
• E-Caliber 
• Domane+ HP 
• Domane+ ALR
• Townie Go!  
• Townie Path Go!
• Attitude Go!

Giant’s e-bike range is also one of great variety, matching client expectations regarding options. The difference is the number of models under each category of e-bike (:

• FastRoad E+ EX (2022)
• Revolt E+ (2022) 
• Roam E+ 
• Trance X Advanced E+ 
• FastRoad E+ EX Pro
• Talon E+ 29 3 
• Trance X E+ Pro 29
• Revolt E+ Pro 28mph
• Stance E+ 
• Explore E+ 

There is little that separates both brands regarding their respective e-bike line of models . Your decision may rest on the price and functionality of the bike also what technology is used in the design.

Giant recently released a model – Reign E+ 0 (2022) that features a 750Wh battery – whereas, until last year, the most powerful battery used was 650Wh by both Trek and Giant.

They both produce bikes in the following categories:

The guys at Bicycling.com and Outsideline.com   concluded that Trek’s E-Caliber 9.9 XTR won the e-mountain bike of the year award in 2021. Another feather in Trek’s hat, a full hat, I might add.

Gravel bikes are designed to perform on gravel paths and tarmac, a bit of a choose-your-own-adventure bike. 

Trek again has a broader range of models for gravel bikes, and their new model Checkpoint SLR 9 eTap has taken the gravel bike scene by storm. 

Giant’s Revolt Advanced Pro (2022) is a cheaper option, with less technology involved, but still a fantastic ride. 

When you can’t afford the top-of-the-range models, you will always find a model from either company that gives you value for money . Finding the right bike for you is all about personal riding preference, your budget, and what you expect to get out of the bike.

Giant VS Trek Mountain Bikes

Both are major mountain bike brands and leaders in the industry, for the right price you get an awesome bike. Some Trek MTB frames are in fact from Giant! Both make great bikes and crappy bikes depending on the price range, anything over $800 is often far superior to a $600-$700 bike.

If you’re a very fast rider or rather heavy don’t get a Giant. Giant’s MTB  suspension have long and flexible lower link which is less comfortable at high speeds and heavy riders might consider it a bit too flexible. Your weight might compress the suspension too much wasting energy and performance.

Only just a couple of years ago Trek had better geometry and suspension design but nowadays there’s hardly any noticeable difference. The most important part is the frame, both offer great frames but with a few small differences . Most of the components come from Shimano or SRAM.

Giant offers the best bang for your buck, they recently even cut prices where Trek did the opposite. From a value proposition, Trek is less attractive , with the recent difference in prices, this is where Giant stands out. Unless you’re able to get a discount on a Trek,  budget-wise Giant is the better choice.

Giant is the largest manufacturer in the world and makes bikes for every brand, their frames are top quality and even Trek sometimes has Giant frames (check the photos from the Giant bike factory in Taiwan). 

Other people report that they find Giant’s frames not stiff enough, but it depends on what you like best and it’s less relevant when it comes to mountain biking. If you’re not the racing type or break bikes occasionally, get a Giant.

Others find Giant’s frame angles less progressive compared to Trek .  When it comes to hydraforming (a process using fluid and high pressure to shape the tube), Trek is doing trickier stuff to gain strength and stiffness.

Most of the time Trek does a better job optimizing frames when it comes to the strength-to-weight . In doubt and if you feel they are equal, check which of them offers the best warranty.

Both perform excellent depending on the bike and your personal preference or body type. Heavyweights and racers will often be better off with a Trek because of the differences in suspension.

Trek is often considered like a plow bike and Giant is more playful , this also depends on how you set up your bike. The more you pay the better the performance and this goes for every reputable brand.

A $500 mountain bike performs a lot worse compared to a higher-end $1500 bike. You get what you pay for and sometimes saving a little bit more is really worth it if you’re looking at a lower range bike. I’d stay away from the cheaper models if you can unless you only plan to use it on roads and pavements.

Here’s a big difference, you often get better quality components when you buy a Giant MTB considering you’re comparing bikes at the same price range. Like mentioned before, Giant can get their parts cheaper because they own many of the factories and buy in bulk.

The components often don’t have anything to do with the brands, they buy them from other manufacturers but the price makes a difference.

Both make great designs and this is really a personal preference. It’s all in the eye of the beholder but often people like Trek designs better . This also might have to do with the brand’s status. Giant is less shiny/flashy, like the Toyota of mountain bikes. They’re reliable, more affordable but not the sexiest.

Giant’s focus is on the quality of the parts and Trek is more into research and development trying to innovate and make better bikes. Suspension layout, for example, is a bit different on Trek bikes.

Trek vs. Giant: Warranty And Customer Service

A warranty is a manufacturer’s guarantee that the product you buy from them is of good quality and doesn’t contain manufacturing defects from their side. 

It gives the consumer (you) the legal right to ask for help from the manufacturer, should any problems arise with their product, according to their terms and conditions.

Both Trek and Giant offer lifetime warranties on their frames and forks, with Trek offering a two-year warranty on:

• Parts 
• Accessories
• Rear Suspension Linkage Components – Rocker link, bearings, accompanying hardware, and components
• Bontrager wheels (with alloy rims)

Trek allows ownership to change from the original owner to a buyer, offering the new owner a warranty on frames and forks. Trek’s Carbon Care Warranty allows customers to get a discount on frame repairs for non-warranty damages.  

Giant’s warranty is for one year on the following and only applies to the original owner of the bike:

• All original components and the paint finish, all Giant repair parts, accessories, and replacement parts are warranted to be free from defects in workmanship and material for one year from the original date of purchase.
• Normal wear and tear
• Improper maintenance
• Improper assembly
• Installation of any components, accessories, and parts not originally intended for or compatible with the bicycle when sold
• Damage or failure due to misuse, accident, abuse, or neglect
• Labor charges for the replacement of parts or changeover
• Non-proprietary products – any other original component or part – covered by the original manufacturer’s warranty

Any modification of the bike’s frame, fork, or any of the components will void the warranty in its entirety. The warranty will be valid from the purchase date and is expressly limited to the replacement or repair of defective items at the manufacturer’s discretion. 

All bikes must be registered when bought by the manufacturers to place the bike under warranty. Spending lots of cash on a bike and not registering it for a warranty is negligent. Please remember to register your new bike immediately.

Both manufacturers offer excellent customer service, as you would expect from industry leaders, such as themselves:

• Customer Service | Trek Bikes  
• Customer Support Contact | Giant Bicycles US

Having the most retail outlets and service centers, Trek might edge Giant in this department regarding faster service delivery.

If you are stuck with a set budget, then Giant may be the bike for you. If your finances allow for it, and you like flashy things, then Trek is the easier choice. High-performance road bikes are Trek’s domain at the moment. A Giant will do just fine for the average rider looking for a comfortable, more playful ride. 

When it comes to Trek vs. Giant, one will always bring out a better model than the other, placing the ball in the other’s court. The thing is that the rival always responds with innovation and upgrades, which is why the bicycling industry is in such a healthy state. 

It all comes down to personal preference, and the whole world can tell you what’s best, but until you get on the saddle of the bike, it’s all just noise. Try both brands at least once, and make your choice from personal experience.

I always had a thing for cycling sports and love almost anything that involves bikes and boards. I work part-time as a designer in the tech industry and work on my blogs whenever I can.

Subscribe to my YouTube channel for video reviews.

Trek CarBack Review: Too Little, Too Late?

CyclistsHub is supported by its readers. We may receive a commission if you buy products using our links.

I have tested all cycling radars available on the market, including Garmin Varia RTL515 , Magene L508 , Bryton Gardia R300L , iGPSport SR30 , and more.

Now, we have a new member: the Trek CarBack bike radar. So, what’s new? And will it be competitive with other radars? I bought it to conclude an in-depth review. I share my conclusions below.

KEY TAKEAWAY

Based on the specifications, the only major benefit of the Trek CarBack radar should be its longer detecting distance of 240m. The other radars usually have a range of around 150m. However, based on my experience and testing, CarBack struggles to detect them consistently so early. It underdelivers in the most important aspect.

I dislike the mount, which feels poorly designed and makes the radar hard to detach. On the other hand, CarBack gives almost no false positives, and its brightness is high. I also find the battery life indicator helpful. Feel free to buy CarBack here or continue reading for more info.

My CarBack rating at a glance: Reliability   4/5 | Multi-object Detection   4/5 | Battery Life   3/5 | Brightness   5/5 | Side Visibility   1/5 | Mount   2/5 | App   3/5 | Price   3/5 | WEIGHTED OVERALL SCORE 3.2/5 More about this cycling radar scoring.

NOTE: I am probably the first person in the Czech Republic to test this radar.

Trek CarBack Specifications

Below, I summarized the technical specifications of the Trek CarBack radar.

Trek CarBack Bike Radar Specifications

• Dimensions: 70×50×25mm
• Weight: 87g
• Claimed battery life: 7-12 hours
• Real battery life: ~11.5 hours in flash mode
• Charging port: USB-C
• Connectivity: ANT+, Bluetooth
• Taillight: Yes
• Brake sensing: No
• Auto standby: No
• Lumens: 5-90
• Light modes: Day flash, day steady, night flash, and night steady
• Water resistance: IPX7
• Detecting distance: 240m
• Detecting speed: 6 to 111 km/h (3.7 to 69 mph)
• Viewing angle: 270°
• Horizontal angle: 35°
• Protocols: ANT+, Bluetooth

Also available at trekbikes.com

Trek CarBack Pros and Cons

Trek CarBack Pros

• Increased sense of safety
• Battery life indicator
• No false negatives, low number of false positives
• Excellent brightness
• Good battery life
• The mount doesn’t slide on the seatpost
• The real battery life almost meets claimed battery life
• USB-C charging port

Trek CarBack Cons

• Questionable detection distance (I still test this one)
• Too wide (causing more drag than other radars)
• Too basic CarBack app
• Line detection is ‘cool’ but basically useless
• The mount feels cheap and is proprietary
• Occasional issues with turning the radar off
• The light doesn’t change the light pattern when overtaking
• No side visibility

Form Factor

Trek CarBack is much wider than other radars on the market. It was probably not designed with aerodynamics in mind. I guess it is targeted at more casual cyclists because it causes more drag (as it’s not hidden behind the seatpost, but its sides exceed it), which can cost precious watts.

I would also expect a much longer battery life than the claimed 7-12 hours. You learn more about how long CarBack lasted in the Battery Life section .

I like the battery level indicator on its side, but I am sure the LEDs (paradoxically) cause unnecessary battery drain.

Package Contents and Setup

The CarBack comes with a universal mount, USB-C charging cable, and manual.

Pairing the radar with my Magene C606 bike computer was flawless. It has ANT+ and Bluetooth connectivity. Like most other sensors, it uses ANT+ to connect to bike computers and Bluetooth to connect with smartphones.

Mount: The Biggest Weakness?

The mount provides a solid fit and does not slip on rounded or aero seatposts. But it feels poorly made. The end of the rubber is secured with a rubber ring, but this solution doesn’t quite work, so the end of the strap flaps. Additionally, the mount socket is proprietary, and removing the radar requires two hands. It also allows radar to be mounted from one side only.

Detecting Distance and Accuracy

The longer vehicle detection distance of 240m, which should be CarBack’s killer feature, is not a deal breaker for me. For comparison, other radars range between 140-190m. The most important thing for me is the radar’s reliability.

Based on my first impressions, the radar detection is very inconsistent. This means that it sometimes detects them from a long distance (usually slow-riding cars/trucks), but sometimes, it struggles and detects them at the last possible moment (<50m). This usually applies to fast-driving cars. In most scenarios, however, it detects the cars at about the same time as Garmin Varia RTL515.

I will keep testing this for more accurate results and update this section accordingly. So, stay tuned.

Zobrazit příspěvek na Instagramu Příspěvek sdílený CyclistsHub.com (@mycyclistshub)

Line Detection

CarBack is the first radar on the market that can also detect lanes. This feature is only available on the Trek Accessories smartphone app and does not work on bike computers. Personally, I doubt its usefulness because I don’t know many people who use a smartphone instead of a bike computer, and I simply don’t see the added value. However, from a technology standpoint, it is probably an interesting development.

I’ve tried the feature, and in most cases, it works by showing the vehicle in the middle, then in the pass zone, and then again in the middle after passing where you are not in danger. With all other radars, I automatically assume that any vehicle passing me is a potential hazard. I don’t need an app to tell me that.

Battery Life

The claimed battery life of CarBack ranges between 7 and 12 hours, depending on the light mode used. I always test radars in day flash mode. The real battery life almost met the claimed one. My CarBack with radar on lasted ~11.5 hours, and then another hour with the taillight on and radar off.

Unlike other radars, CarBack will turn off the radar when the battery drops below 5%, but the rear light will continue to flash. So don’t rely on the radar when the battery is too low!

Other Issues with CarBack

The CarBack disappointed me even more by failing to turn off using the physical button a few times or by failing to switch the light modes. I noticed this was only the case when paired with the Garmin Edge 840 . Surprisingly, the radar did not turn off, even holding the button for more than 30 seconds (which is normally enough for a “hard reset”). I was only able to turn it off when I turned off the bike computer. I managed to capture this failure on video, which will be in a video review I’m preparing.

Finally, although it has excellent brightness, the light does not change the flashing pattern when you are overtaken to alert the driver. This is another disappointment as it is one of the most useful features that radar tail lights have.

The price is the same as the Garmin Varia RTL515. CarBack costs $199 (£169.99 | €199.99 | AU$299). So, I’m wondering what is the main reason for choosing this radar over cheaper but similarly capable (and more consistent) competitors such as Magene, Bryton, or iGPSport radars.

Based on my first impressions, I expected much more from CarBack. Despite the micro USB charging port, I would recommend Varia RTL515.

Trek CarBack vs. The Competition

The following table compares Trek CarBack with other bicycle radars, like Garmin Varia RTL515, Bryton Gardia R300L, Magene L508, and iGPSport SR30.

My first impressions of the Trek CarBack are mixed. I am more disappointed than excited. Its detection is inconsistent. That is, it detects some cars from around 200m away, while some cars at the last possible moment (50m or less). So far, Trek hasn’t been able to live up to its bold claims, and given the high price of the radar, I’d rather recommend the Garmin Varia RTL515. However, there is a chance that Trek is working on a new firmware update that could improve accuracy.

Another weakness of this radar is the mount, which appears to be poorly designed and has a proprietary socket. The form factor is also not the best for the discerning road user due to the less aerodynamic shape (the CarBack really doesn’t look good on road bikes).

The CarBack has excellent brightness, but unfortunately does not change the light pattern when someone overtakes you. Its battery life indicator is a nice plus.

What do you think of the new radar? Let me know in the comments.

About The Author

Petr Minarik

Leave a comment cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Start typing and press enter to search

Track vs.Tract: How to Choose the Right Word

Nearly Homophones With Little in Common Otherwise

• An Introduction to Punctuation
• How to Use "Track"
• How to Use "Tract"

How to Remember the Difference

• Ph.D., Rhetoric and English, University of Georgia
• M.A., Modern English and American Literature, University of Leicester
• B.A., English, State University of New York

The words "track" and "tract" are  near homophones : They sound similar but have different meanings. The only difference in pronunciation is that "tract" includes the "t" sound at the very end.

"Track" can be either a noun or a verb, whereas "tract" is a noun with several different meanings. Both are common in spoken and written English, so it's important to understand how to correctly use each.

How to Use "Track"

The word "track" can be used as a noun or a verb, and the meaning changes radically, depending on its usage.

As a noun , "track" means a literal or figurative path, route, or course. A common use of the word "track" relates to a running track; a related use of the word is in the expression "track and field," meaning athletic endeavors related to running, jumping, shot put, and discus throwing. The noun "track" also refers to a mark left on the floor or ground by a person, animal, or vehicle. 

As a verb , "track" means to travel, pursue, or follow: One can "track" an animal by following its "tracks." One can also "track" information or "keep track" of events, finances, or the movements of people, animals, or vehicles.

How to Use "Tract"

The noun "tract" has a number of distinct meanings. A "tract" can be an expanse of land or water, a housing development, or a pamphlet containing a declaration, appeal, or religious message. The word "tract" also refers to certain systems of organs and tissues in the body: the digestive tract, the intestinal tract, the respiratory tract, and the urinary tract.

The following examples represent the use of the word "track" in all of its meanings. In the first sentence, the word is used as a noun and means a path or route. In the second, the word is used as a noun meaning to pursue or follow, and in the third, "track" is used as a noun meaning the marks left by an animal.

• The volunteers cleared the track through the woods, making it safe for hikers.
• The police tracked the car and found that it had been stolen.
• Roger found a coyote track in the backyard and kept his dog safely inside.

The examples below use the word "tract" in its various meanings. In the first sentence, "tract" is used to mean a system of organs and tissues. In the second sentence, a "tract" is a political declaration. In the third sentence, it refers to a large expanse of land.

• The diver reached between the jaws of the shark to dislodge a grappling hook that was stuck in the animal's digestive tract .
• In 1774, Thomas Jefferson wrote his first tract  on politics, a set of instructions for the Virginia delegates to the First Continental Congress.
• The large tracts of land available for development were once farmers' fields.

The word "track" is much more commonly used than "tract," and it is generally used to either describe a running track or the process of tracking a person or animals. The expression "keep track of" is also very common and is usually used when discussing either information management, as in "I'm trying to keep track of all these invoices," or management of children or animals, as in "It's hard to keep track of my kids' many activities."

The word "tract" is more often used in legal documents regarding purchase or sale of land, in religious contexts (a religious tract), or in medical settings (a blocked digestive tract). It is rarely used in casual conversation.

• " Track vs Tract ." Grammarist.
• " Tract ." Merriam-Webster, Merriam-Webster.
• Coarse vs. Course: How to Choose the Right Word
• Over 300 Homonyms, Homophones, and Homographs
• Were, We're, and Where: How to Choose the Right Word
• The 9 Parts of Speech: Definitions and Examples
• Buy, By, and Bye: How to Choose the Right Word
• Premier vs. Premiere: How to Choose the Right Word
• Alternate vs. Alternative: How to Choose the Right Word
• Right, Rite, Wright, and Write: How to Choose the Right Word
• Aid vs. Aide: How to Choose the Right Word
• Afterward vs. Afterword: How to Choose the Right Word
• Hoard vs. Horde: How to Choose the Right Word
• Cue vs. Queue: How to Choose the Right Word
• Shear vs. Sheer: How to Choose the Right Word
• Passed vs. Past: How to Choose the Right Word
• Bare vs. Bear: How to Choose the Right Word
• Assume vs. Presume: How to Choose the Right Word

Trek teases new Check**** gravel bike - here's everything we know about it

Trek already has the Checkpoint, but it looks like a new gravel race bike is set to disturb the market

• Sign up to our newsletter Newsletter

The dust has settled - and the mud has been removed - following another chaotic weekend of racing at the World's biggest gravel event, Unbound.

The Kansas gravel race served as a testing ground for a host of new tech, including SRAM 13-speed XPLR AXS  and a prototype Giant gravel bike . Plus, it seems, a new machine from Trek, which the American brand teased in a video where supported athlete Russell Finsterwald outlined the detail, complete with comical bleeps.

'Checkmate' featured on the top tube of the bike we saw

Though information on the mystery bike is scarce, there are still some highlights we can pick out on the new '********', based on pictures taken during the race. 

Judging by shots we were able to grab on the ground, unless the logo painted onto one Unbound bike was a tease, too, it'll be called a 'Checkmate' - setting it apart from the 'Checkpoint' which already exists within the range.

A post shared by Trek Bicycle Company (@trekbikes) A photo posted by on

The first thing Finsterwald seems to cover in the video is a brand-new cockpit up front. Thus far, all of Trek's gravel cockpits, on both the Checkpoint and the Boone, have been a two-piece affair, making it likely that Trek has designed the new bar and stem from the ground up for gravel.

A post shared by russell finsterwald (@finsty) A photo posted by on

A closer look at the top of the handlebar in the images above reveal a narrower cross section than the current brand's road going Madone SLR handlebar, along with what could be some rubber inserts on the tops.

This, we think, may well be a gravel specific edition, aimed at improving grip and comfort for long days on rough terrain.

Where you will find familiar parts, however, is on the frameset itself. Immediately recognisable, is what looks to be a version of Trek's 'Rear IsoSpeed' system which is located on the seat tube. The IsoSpeed system, which was first introduced on the Trek Domane back in the 2010s, concists of a pivot and bushing system that allows for added vertical compliance to the bike at the saddle.

Trek also looks to have used a rather slim seat post too, alongside incredibly slender seat stays, once again likely aimed at improving comfort over rough terrain.

A note on tyre clearance too - Finsterwald chose 700x50c tyres for the Unbound race, and by the looks of things, there is still a fair amount of leeway both at the fork, and by the rear triangle. In all likelihood, the new bike will be rated for at least 50c tyres, but we think it you could probably fit a 52c tyre, rim dependant of course.

The slight rear of the bike comes as quite a contrast to what is a much more industrial front end. The head tube area, front fork, and downtube, are all fairly robust in their construction, making us think that the new bike might well fit into to the gravel race bike category.

The only slight confusion lies in the profiling of the tube shapes up front. Aside from the integrated cockpit, the new bike doesn't seem to go all out with truncated aerofoil tube shapes, instead utilizing more traditional design. 

The eagle eyed amongst you (no SRAM pun intended) may have noticed that the Trek bike wasn't the only bit of unreleased kit that Finsterwald was using. He was one of a few riders using SRAM's new expected RED XPLR groupset, and it tells us something else about his new Trek frameset.

The new 13-speed groupset shares some architecture with SRAM's XX Eagle transmission, in that they both utilize SRAM's Universal Derailleur Hanger System. Aimed at improving rear derailleur strength and stiffness, the system relies on bike manufacturers creating framesets that are compatible with the new technology - something that Trek is clearly on board with on the new bike.

We don't currently have any further information or release dates regarding the new bike, but we expect that you can expect to see the new bike in shops before the end of 2024, potentially replacing - or complimenting - the long-standing Checkpoint, and alongside the Trek Boone Cyclocross bike.

Thank you for reading 20 articles this month* Join now for unlimited access

Enjoy your first month for just £1 / $1 / €1

*Read 5 free articles per month without a subscription

Join now for unlimited access

Try first month for just £1 / $1 / €1

Get The Leadout Newsletter

The latest race content, interviews, features, reviews and expert buying guides, direct to your inbox!

Joe is Cycling Weekly's tech writer. He's always had a love for bikes, since first riding a two wheeled steed before the age of four. Years down the line, Joe began racing at 16, and enjoyed great experiences internationally, racing in Italy, Spain and Belgium to name a few locations. Always interested in tech, Joe even piloted his Frankenstein hill climb bike to a Junior National Title in 2018.  After taking a step back from elite level racing in April 2022, Joe joined our team as a freelancer, before becoming Tech Writer in May 2023. 

The US Gravel National Championships will return to Gering, Nebraska, on September 8

By Anne-Marije Rook Published 24 July 24

Slovenian won his third Tour title in Nice last weekend, and picked up a host of new trophies on Strava

By Tom Thewlis Published 24 July 24

Useful links

• Tour de France
• Giro d'Italia
• Vuelta a España

buyers-guides

• Best road bikes
• Best gravel bikes
• Best smart turbo trainers
• Best cycling computers
• Editor's Choice
• Bike Reviews
• Component Reviews
• Clothing Reviews
• Contact Future's experts
• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Cookies policy
• Advertise with us

Cycling Weekly is part of Future plc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site . © Future Publishing Limited Quay House, The Ambury, Bath BA1 1UA. All rights reserved. England and Wales company registration number 2008885.

• Fly Fishing Tours
• Latest Stories
• Our Commitment
• Customer Reviews

The O Circuit vs. The W Trek: Which to choose?

After deciding to trek in Torres del Paine your next step is to decide which trek to do, the W Trek or the O Circuit. This blog will explore the similarities and difference between the two treks so that you can choose which one is the best fit for your Patagonian adventure.

Park Geography: Torres del Paine National Park spans over 180,000 hectares and lies 112 km north of the coastal city, Puerto Natales. The granite pillars, Torres del Paine (Towers of Paine), are found on the east side of the park while Glacier Grey and John Gardner Pass are found on the west side. Los Cuernos del Paine (The Horns of Paine) are to the south just above Lake Nordenskjöld.

The O Circuit, also referred to as the Paine Circuit, forms a full loop around the park, while the W Trek makes a “W” shape to the south of the park. The O Circuit includes the W Trek, which makes up the southern portion of the circuit.

Itinerary and routes: The W trek is primarily trekked east to west starting at the park entrance located in the south east corner of the park and ending at Glacier Grey. The O Circuit can only be hiked in a counterclockwise direction also starting at the park entrance.

The first leg of the O Circuit is to the Towers of Paine where you will hike through the Ascencio Valley. From here, the trail begins it counterclockwise loop, following the Paine River until reaching Lake Paine. From Lake Paine to Lake Dickson the top section of the loop is formed. This area is more remote and sees fewer trekkers which is a big plus for those who prefer less crowded tails. Once reaching Lake Dickson, the trail moves south west until reaching the highest point of the trek, John Gardner Pass at 1200m/3900ft. The trail is challenging at this point, but trekkers are reward with stellar views of the Patagonian Ice Fields and Glacier Grey. After descending down the pass, the trail will meet up with the W-Trek and the trial may become noticeably more crowded. The trail continues along the W Trek, but O Circuit trekkers will be hiking in the opposite direction from the majority of people trekking the W. For the O Circuit 7 Days the journey ends at Paine Grande followed by a picturesque ferry ride across Lake Pehoe. On the other hand, with the O Full Circuit 9 Days trekkers will complete the full circuit, ending where they began, at the park entrance.

Like the O Circuit, the first leg of the W Trek will be to the Towers of Paine but after coming down out of the Ascencio Valley instead of heading east like with the O Circuit, trekkers will head west along Lake Nordenskjöld. After passing the Horns, trekkers will go up the French Valley spotting hanging glaciers along the way. From the French Valley the trail will head towards Paine Grande and then up towards Lake Grey and Glacier Grey. The same distance and trail is covered with the Classic W Trek 5 Days and the W Trek Highlights – 4 Days/ 3 Nights . The main difference is that with the W Trek Highlights, the trekking begins on day one of the itinerary while with the Classic W Trek, trekking begins on the second day of the itinerary.

A great way to add some extra adventure into your trek is by ice hiking on Glacier Grey, which is possible with both the O Circuit and W Trek. Ice hiking is possible on the 5th day of the Classic W Trek 5 Days as well as the 5th day of the O Full Circuit 9 days. It’s important to note that ice hiking must be done early in the morning.

Both the O Circuit and W Trek have guided options and for the W self-guided treks can be done during the shoulder season September, October and April. To read more about our guided and self-guided options, please click here .

Time and length: The W Trek is approximately 80 km/50 miles long while the O Circuit is 110 km/68 miles. The W Trek can be completed in 4 or 5 days while the O Circuit requires 7 to 9 days. The duration of the trek depends on factors such as what time of day you start the trek, trekking pace and side hikes.

Due to its shorter completion time, the W Trek receives more trekkers than the O Circuit. In reverse, the O Circuit, taking longer to complete, receives fewer trekkers. The national park does not limit how many trekkers are permitted to do the W Trek (as long as they have accommodation reserved – see below), however the park only allows 80 trekkers to be on the top section of the O Circuit at a time.

Accommodation: Lodges and Camping Torres del Paine offers two types of accommodation for trekkers, lodges (in Spanish called “refugios”) and campsites. Along the W Trek it is possible to stay in lodges for the duration of your trek if you so choose. Camping is also available if this is your preference and a mix of camping and staying in lodges is also possible.

Despite whether you choose to sleep in the lodges or camp, please note that along the W Trek you will eat all of your meals in the lodges.

With the O Circuit however, camping is compulsory along the north side of the loop as there are no lodges between Refugio Las Torres, near the park’s entrance, and Refugio Dickson. Once the trail reaches Refugio Dickson, lodges are available, but you can continue to camp as well if you would like.

Lodging within the park is limited and trekkers without reservations at lodges or campsites will under no circumstances be permitted to stay overnight in the park. Accommodation books up quickly (especially in peak season), so please be sure to make your booking well in advance. To read more about why it’s important to book in advance, please click here .

Difficulty level: Neither the O Circuit nor the W Trek are known for being particularly strenuous, but naturally, due to its longer duration, the O Circuit is more challenging. The O Circuit also includes trekking up and over John Gardner pass, which can be a difficult climb.

For the O Circuit, trekkers spend around 4 to 10 hours trekking per day whereas with the W Trek, trekkers spend around 5 to 8 hours a day trekking. For more information on training for Torres del Paine, please click here .

Seasons: High season in Torres del Paine National Park runs from October 1st to April 30th (summertime in the southern hemisphere) and the low season is from May 1st to September 30th (wintertime).

The W Trek is open to trekkers year round, while the O Circuit is only open in the summertime. A good time to hike the W trek is from September to April and for the O Circuit, November to March is best.

The busiest time in the park is from November to February.

It’s common to experience what feels like all four seasons in one day in Patagonia, so make sure you are prepared. Torres del Paine is infamous for its high winds which are present in all four seasons. On average, the warmest month is January and the coldest month is July. The driest month is November while the wettest month is May.

Differences in packing: When packing for either the O Circuit or W Trek, keep in mind that you will be carrying what you pack, so be wary of over-packing. A 35 – 40 liter backpack should provide you with the right amount of space to carry what you will need for your trek.

While there aren’t major differences between what you should bring for each trek, it would be a good idea to bring extra inner layers of clothing for the O Circuit simply being that it’s a longer trek. Bring along extra socks, shirts and underwear.

It is not possible to rent gear once inside of the national park, so double check before departing from your hotel in Puerto Natales that you have everything that you will need.

To see our recommended packing list, please click here .

About the Author Robert Hatch

Rob is an outdoor enthusiast and traveler who got tired of staring at the mountains from his desk, he now spends every minute he can on them instead. He fell in love with Nepal on his first visit and has looked for every opportunity to get back to the Himalayas ever since. He helps our guests find and plan their perfect Himalayan adventure.

Contact the author

Popular Treks

What’s Hot

• Antarctica (6)
• Argentina (2)
• Español (1)
• Patagonia (14)
• Staying Healthy (2)
• Travel Updates (1)

Why book with us?

Getting the best price is great, getting the best value is even better. We have local office in Chile to provide the support and service you expect.

We handle all sorts of group requests and can help you customize the perfect trek whatever your group size or needs.

Our team is standing by 24/7 to assist from the time you inquire about a trek until the last day. Our goal is to ensure everyone has a great trekking experience.

• Privacy Policy
• Terms & Conditions

Amazing Treks & Climbs

Get our free monthly newsletter highlighting some of the worlds best treks and climbs.

Get our free monthly newsletter highlighting some of the worlds best treks and climbs. Get Inspired by amazing photos and our practical trekking advice.

• Published: July 18, 2024
• Updated: July 23, 2024

Trek vs. Specialized Bikes – 8 Key Differences Explained

Celia spence.

As a long-time cycling enthusiast, I’ve had the privilege of riding a variety of bikes from different brands. Two brands that have always stood out to me are Trek and Specialized. Trek, with its vast array of options and years of experience, is like the wise old sage of the bike world.

On the other hand, we have Specialized, mavericks of the bike industry known for their relentless innovation. Let’s delve into this epic showdown between two titans of the biking world.

Trek vs. Specialized Overview

Known for their durability and high quality, Trek bikes are like the heavyweight champions of the bike world. They might be a bit more expensive, but you’re paying for a bike that’s built to last. Plus, with a wider range of models, Trek offers something for every kind of rider.

Specialized

Specialized bikes are the featherweights of the industry – lighter and nimbler, but perhaps not as durable as their Trek counterparts. They might not have as many models, but what they lack in variety, they make up for in innovation.

Choosing between Trek and Specialized depends on your personal preferences. If you value durability and quality and are willing to invest more, Trek might be your champion. If you seek a lighter ride and prioritize innovation, Specialized could be the one for you.

History and Evolution

Founded in 1976 by bike racer Dick Burke and frame builder Bevil Hogg, Trek entered the industry with a vision for high-quality, lightweight bikes. Starting with hand-built steel frames, they soon moved on to aluminum and other materials, consistently staying ahead of the curve.

Today, Trek has over 700 dealers in North America and Europe, offering a wide range of bikes from entry-level rides to high-end racing machines.

Popular Models

Trek’s most popular model is the Domane, a road bike focused on comfort and stability. It features a unique frame construction that shields the rider from road vibrations, perfect for long, grueling rides.

Trek also offers a line of electric bikes, the Powerfly, equipped with a motor and battery to assist with hills and long distances.

Our Pick: Trek Marlin 5 Gen 2

The Trek Marlin 5 Gen 2 stands out as a top pick for mountain biking enthusiasts. It offers quality without a high price.

Key Features:

• Excellent for mountain biking beginners
• Versatile for trails and commutes
• Hydraulic brakes for better control
• Reasonably priced
• Might need upgrades over time
• Limited to hardtail design

Specialized Bikes: History and Innovation

History Highlights:

• Started in a humble garage
• Became a major player in the bike world
• Innovator in mass-produced carbon fiber bicycles

Specialized Bikes: Range and Variety

Product Range:

Our Pick: Specialized Allez

The Specialized Allez is a distinguished road bike known for its quality and adaptability.

• Premium aluminum and carbon composition
• Dynamic gear setup
• Exceptional value for the price
• Adaptable for varied ride durations
• Preference for disc over rim brakes
• 8-speed cassette range

Trek Bikes: Range

Frame comparison, groupset comparison.

Wheels Comparison

Tires comparison, brakes comparison, related posts:.

• Is Trek 800 Mountain Bike Good? Here's Our Detailed…
• Is Trek 800 Mountain Bike Good? - Find Out Here!

What Is a Pit Bike? How Is It Different from Dirt Bikes?

• Cyclocross vs. Gravel Bikes - What’s the Difference?
• 7 Best Three Wheel Bikes for Seniors 2024 - Comfort & Safety

You may Also Like

How Fast Does A 200CC Mini Bike Go?

Is Trek 800 Mountain Bike Good? Here’s Our Detailed Overview!

What Are the Spokes on a Bike For? Everything You Need to Know

Is Trek 800 Mountain Bike Good? – Find Out Here!

Is Nishiki a Good Bike? – An Honest Review

Trek vs. Track

Check any text for mistakes in above text box. Use the Grammar Checker to check your text.

A slow or difficult journey.

(South Africa) A journey by ox wagon.

(South Africa) The Boer migration of 1835-1837.

(intransitive) To make a slow or arduous journey.

(intransitive) To journey on foot, especially to hike through mountainous areas.

(South Africa) To travel by ox wagon.

To draw or haul a load, as oxen.

To travel, esp. by ox wagon; to go from place to place; to migrate.

The act of trekking; a drawing or a traveling; a journey; a migration.

a journey by ox wagon (especially an organized migration by a group of settlers)

any long and difficult trip

journey on foot, especially in the mountains;

make a long and difficult journey;

A mark left by something that has passed along.

A mark or impression left by the foot, either of man or animal.

The entire lower surface of the foot; said of birds, etc.

A road or other similar beaten path.

Physical course; way.

A path or course laid out for a race, for exercise, etc.

The direction and progress of someone or something; path.

(railways) The way or rails along which a train moves.

A tract or area, such as of land.

Awareness of something, especially when arising from close monitoring.

(automotive) The distance between two opposite wheels on a same axletree (also track width)

(automotive) Short for caterpillar track.

(cricket) The pitch.

Sound stored on a record.

The physical track on a record.

(music) A song or other relatively short piece of music, on a record, separated from others by a short silence

A circular (never-ending) data storage unit on a side of magnetic or optical disk, divided into sectors.

The racing events of track and field; track and field in general.

A session talk on a conference.

To continue observing over time.

(transitive) To observe the (measured) state of a person or object over time.

(transitive) To monitor the movement of a person or object.

(transitive) To match the movement or change of a person or object.

To travel so that a moving object remains in shot.

(transitive) To follow the tracks of.

(transitive) To discover the location of a person or object.

(transitive) To leave in the form of tracks.

To create a musical recording (a track).

To create music using tracker software.

A mark left by something that has passed along; as, the track, or wake, of a ship; the track of a meteor; the track of a sled or a wheel.

A mark or impression left by the foot, either of man or beast; trace; vestige; footprint.

The entire lower surface of the foot; - said of birds, etc.

A road; a beaten path.

Course; way; as, the track of a comet.

The permanent way; the rails.

A tract or area, as of land.

To follow the tracks or traces of; to pursue by following the marks of the feet; to trace; to trail; as, to track a deer in the snow.

To draw along continuously, as a vessel, by a line, men or animals on shore being the motive power; to tow.

a line or route along which something travels or moves;

evidence pointing to a possible solution;

a pair of parallel rails providing a runway for wheels

a course over which races are run

a distinct selection of music from a recording or a compact disc;

an endless metal belt on which tracked vehicles move over the ground

(computer science) one of the circular magnetic paths on a magnetic disk that serve as a guide for writing and reading data

a groove on a phonograph recording

a bar or bars of rolled steel making a track along which vehicles can roll

any road or path affording passage especially a rough one

the act of participating in an athletic competition involving running on a track

carry on the feet and deposit;

observe or plot the moving path of something;

go after with the intent to catch;

travel across or pass over;

make tracks upon

More relevant Comparisons

• Speciality vs. Specialty
• Sledge vs. Sled
• Enlargen vs. Enlarge
• Threw vs. Through
• Buffet vs. Smorgasbord

Important Links

Please wait....

Send us a message

Have a question about something not found in our support links? Mon-Fri 9am-4pm PST

(866) 300-3311

Aventon vs Trek: What’s In A Name, Besides The High Prices?

• December 4, 2023

High costs don’t always equate to better features, quality, and reliability. Oftentimes consumers are paying for the name on the frame, and not the actual technology that adds to the overall experience of riding an ebike.

While big-name brands such as Trek have a solid frame and good components, they are still leaving riders wanting more out of the bikes after paying such a high price. This includes more motor power, transparency of actual top speed, and warranties that cover motors and batteries. You’d think by making such a large financial investment the bikes would come with simple technology such as display screens that give riders real-time metrics to reduce “range anxiety,” but they don’t.

Out of the box and ready to roll with a 2-year warranty that covers everything from the frame to electrical components, Aventon has you covered. Not only that, but most Aventon ebikes can reach a top speed of 28 mph on pedal assist, and 20 with a throttle, making those longer rides a thrill.

Also, to reduce range anxiety, all Aventon ebike models come with Full Color Display screens that give riders all the important riding information they need while on the road, including battery life, current speed, mileage and so much more.

Take a look at what separates the bikes beyond the price tag, including innovative technology, motor power, and all around rideability:

• 1. Marlin+ 6 vs Ramblas
• 2. E-Caliber 9.6 Gen 2 vs Ramblas
• 4. Verve+ 3 vs Level
• 5. Allant+ 7 vs Level
• 6. Dual Sport+ 2 vs Soltera
• 7. FX+ 2 vs Soltera
• 8. Fetch+ 2 vs Abound
• 9. Powerfly 4 Gen 4 vs Aventure

Key Differentiators

Trek marlin+ 6 vs aventon ramblas.

Priced at $2,899, both the Trek Marlin+ 6 and the Aventon Ramblas come equipped with 250W mid-drive motors, a top speed of 20 mph, and performance-rated components. Beyond that there is no comparison.

Rambas has 708 watt-hours of battery power giving riders 308 more watt-hours of consistent riding and a further range of up to 80 miles. That’s 30 more miles than Marlin+ 6’s of up to 50 miles.

As for the components, Ramblas has a Sram NX Eagle 1x12, Rockshox suspension with 130mm of travel, Sram DB8 mineral 4 piston hydraulic disc brakes, 29” x 2.4” Maxxis, and a dropper post with 150mm of travel for optimal riding.

As of March 20th, 2024, Trek Marlin+ 6 has had zero reviews after two months of being released, while Ramblas has nine 5-star reviews.

Need more convincing? Here are more reasons to ride Ramblas:

• Up to 80 miles in range vs Marlin+ 6’s 50 miles of range giving riders 30 more miles of confident riding.

100 nm of torque vs Marlin+ 6’s 50 nm of torque for 100% more power to climb hills and go faster, quicker.

708Wh battery means more riding time and a lot more fun as compared to Marlin+ 6’s 400Wh. That’s 308 more watt-hours of consistent power.

Rockshox suspension with 130mm of travel vs Marlin+ 6’s SR Suntour XCM 34 with 120mm of travel, adding 10mm of extra comfort on rugged trails and rough roads.

Dropper post with 150mm of travel offers optimal riding positions while the Marlin+ 6’s doesn’t have one.

250-watt A100 mid-drive motor offers equal power to Marlin+ 6’s Bosch 250W motor. Ramblas also has a peak of 750W while Marlin+ 6 only has 600W. Both offer in-app ride tune capabilities to adjust pedal assist levels for a more personalized riding experience.

Sram SX Eagle 12-speed 11-50t cassette vs Marlin+ 6’s Shimano U4000, 9 speed offers riders three (3) extra gears and on the cassette for more efficiency to climb hills, roll around on trails and ride faster on flat surfaces.

Optional headlight included with Ramblas allows for better visibility in low-lighting conditions on and off the trail, while a headlight for the Marlin+ 6 can be an additional cost of up to $419.99.

The Ramblas LCD display vs Marlin+ 6’s handlebar LCD offers the same ride status specs, such as current speed, pedal assist level, battery life and more.

$2,899 price tag vs Marlin+ 6’s $2,699 price tag, offers a stronger battery, torque, and much more.

Find an Aventon dealer near me .

Trek E-Caliber 9.6 Gen 2 vs Aventon Ramblas

Choosing between the Ramblas and the E-Caliber 9.6 Gen 2 electric mountain bikes comes down to more than just preference—it's about getting the most value and performance for your investment. At $2,899, the Ramblas is substantially more affordable than the E-Caliber 9.6, priced at $6,649.99, saving buyers $3,750.

This comparison dives into the specifics of each bike, from their motors and battery life to their suspension and additional features, to help you decide which eMTB suits your riding style and needs better. With the Ramblas offering significant savings without compromising on quality components and ride comfort, it's a compelling option for those looking to explore both city streets and rugged trails.

Ramblas boasts:

$2,899 price tag vs E-Caliber 9.6 Gen 2’s $6,649.99, saving you $3,750 on total cost.

708Wh battery means more riding time and a lot more fun as compared to E-Caliber 9.6 Gen 2’s 250Wh. That's a 95% increase in battery power.

100nm of torque compared to E-Caliber 9.6 Gen 2’s 55nm of torque. That’s an increase of 58% increase of torque for more power to climb hills and go faster, quicker.

Integrated front light will help light the way on trails and streets in low lighting conditions. This is an upgrade cost of up to $420 with the E-Caliber 9.6 Gen 2.

Superior fork suspension with 130mm of travel offers more cushion on rugged terrain as compared to the E-Caliber 9.6 Gen 2’s 120mm of travel.

Trek Verve+ 3 vs Aventon Level

Get the power and speed you need for the right price with Aventon’s Level. Priced at only $1,899, you get a 500W motor, a top speed of 28 mph and a range of up to 60 miles on a single charge.

Compare that to Trek’s Verve Plus 3 at $3,299 that has some of its riders complaining the bike doesn’t have enough motor power to even reach its top speed of 20 mph and range of up to 46 miles which is 30% less distance per charge.

Level has many great features, including:

$1,899 price tag vs Verve Plus 3’s $3,299 , saving you nearly twice the total cost.

500 watt rear hub motor - Level’s 500 watt motor has twice the power of Trek’s Verve Plus 3’s 250 watt motor, giving you more power to go farther, faster.

28 mph top speed - Why stop at 20 mph, when you can go 28? Hit top speeds with Level by going 29% faster, making long commutes around town feel shorter, because they are.

Up to 60 miles in range with the Level is a 24% increase in range as compared to Trek’s Verve Plus 3’s 46 miles.

65mm of suspension travel - Temper rough roads with Level’s 65mm of suspension travel compared to Verve Plus 3’s rigid fork.

Thumb Throttle - Need to rest a little? There’s no shame in that. That’s what the throttle is there for, so you can sit back and enjoy the ride. Trek’s Verve Plus 3 doesn’t have a throttle.

Puncture-resistant tires with side reflectors - You never know what lies ahead on the road for your daily roll. Level’s puncture-resistant tires will keep you rolling to your destination over rough roads or fine gravel. Trek’s Verve Plus 3 only has racing tires.

Multiple color options - With the Level you can choose between four color options: Clay, Glacier, Polar, & Himalayan. While Verve Plus 3 only comes in matte black.

Trek Allant+ 7 vs Aventon Level

Get the support you need when you need it for less cost. Aventon’s Level comes with a 500 watt motor that’s twice as powerful as Trek’s Allant Plus 7 for less than half its price at $3,499. Even at such a high ticket price, Trek riders have still expressed their frustrations. One rider said they “bought Trek for the support” but Trek left them “high and dry.”

Here’s what the Level boasts over Trek’s Allant Plus 7:

$1,899 price tag vs Allant Plus 7’s $3,499, saving you nearly twice the cost.

500 watt rear hub motor - Power shouldn’t be an issue when you need pedal assistance most. Aventon’s Level has twice the power of the Allant Plus 7 for half the price.

28 mph top speed - Why only go 20 mph with Allant Plus 7, when you can go 28mph with Level? Go 29% faster, all over town or around the city. Faster is simply faster.

Thumb Throttle - The throttle is there for you to sit back and enjoy the ride. Allant Plus 7 doesn’t have a throttle.

Multiple color options - With the Level you can choose between four color options: Clay, Glacier, Polar, & Himalayan. While Verve Plus 3 only comes in the Nautical navy.

Trek Dual Sport+ 2 vs Aventon Soltera

Avoid paying a high price of $2,399 for “poor quality of motor or speed sensor” as one Trek Dual Sport Plus 2 rider put it. Half the price at $1,199, Aventon’s Soltera has a more powerful 350 watt motor, higher 25 mph top speed, and a further range of 45 miles.

Another rider shared their dissatisfaction with the Dual Sport Plus 2, citing its “very poor range performance for the price and advertised specs.” Plus, with Soltera you get incredibly innovative tech, including turn signals and a thumb throttle for convenience.

Compared to Trek’s Dual Sport Plus 2, Aventon’s Soltera boasts:

$1,199 price tag vs Dual Sport Plus 2’s $2,399, saving you $1,300 in total cost.

A powerful 350 watt motor that’ll enhance your riding experience, giving you more power when you need it most from reputable brands you can rely on as compared to the Dual Sport Plus 2’s 250 watt motor. That’s 29% more power to hit the streets.

A 25 mph top speed & 46 mile range allows riders to go farther, faster with less effort vs the Trek Dual Sport Plus 2’s speed capacity of only 20 mph and range of up to 35 miles. That’s 25% faster and 23% more range.

Built-in turn-signals are safety tech that provides riders with extra confidence when riding on the streets, day or night. For twice the price, Trek’s Dual Sport Plus 2 doesn't have turn signals.

Thumb Throttle - Take a break from pedaling without hesitation with Soltera thumb throttle. The throttle is designed precisely for moments like these, allowing you to relax and savor the journey. It's worth noting that the Dual Sport Plus 2 doesn't feature a throttle.

Multiple color options - With the Level you can choose between four color options: Citrine, Matte Midnight Black, Storm Blue & Ghost White. While Dual Sport Plus 2 only comes in Hex blue and Galactic grey.

Trek FX+ 2 vs Aventon Soltera

A high priced bike from a reputable brand doesn’t always mean quality. Priced at $2,499, Trek’s FX Plus 2 riders have expressed frustrations. One rider said “this bike has NEVER made it 7 days in a row without something failing.”

More than double Soltera.2’s price at $1,199, the FX Plus 2 doesn’t even come with a display to show riders current speed or battery life, causing range anxiety. Make it to your destination with the right amount of power, top speed and range.

At less than half of Trek’s FX Plus 2, Soltera boasts:

$1,199 price tag vs FX Plus 2’s $2,499, saving you over $1,300 in total cost.

A robust 350-watt motor provides reliable power when you need it most. Compared to the FX Plus 2's 250-watt motor, this means 29% more power to conquer the streets.

A 25 mph top speed & 46 mile range surpasses the FX Plus 2's capacity with a top speed of only 20 mph and a range of up to 35 miles. This translates to 25% faster speeds and an impressive 23% increase in range.

Built-in turn signals will enhance your street riding confidence. This safety feature provides added assurance day or night. Surprisingly, Trek's FX Plus 2, priced at twice the cost, lacks this crucial safety technology.

Soltera.2's thumb throttle lets riders enjoy a break from pedaling. Specifically designed for moments of relaxation, it lets you unwind and appreciate the journey. Notably, the FX Plus 2 lacks this convenient throttle feature.

Multiple color options - With the Level.2 you can choose between four color options: Citrine, Matte Midnight Black, Storm Blue & Ghost White. While FX Plus 3 only comes in 3: black, blue and sage.

Trek Fetch+ 2 vs Aventon Abound

At $5,999, Fetch Plus 2 riders have expressed concern about the bike’s gear derailleur being “at higher risk of getting hit and bent” because it sits too low, “especially when carrying heavier load than normal.”

Aventon’s Abound, priced at less than half the cost at $1,999, offers a more powerful 750 watt motor, a high top speed of 28 miles per hour, a suspension with 50mm of travel, and innovative tech, such as built-in turn signals.

Abound is the ultimate cargo ebike that offers riders:

$1,999 price tag vs Fetch Plus 2’s $5,999 . That’s nearly 3x the total cost

A 750 watt motor offers riders 3x more power than Trek’s Fetch Plus 2’s 250 watt motor. With Abound, riders can go farther, farther with everything they need in tow.

28 mph top speed - Don’t settle for 20 mph with Fetch Plus 2 when you can reach 28 mph with Abound. Experience a 29% increase in speed, whether navigating through town with your precious cargo.

50mm of suspension travel provides extra comfort while hauling your precious cargo as compared to Fetch Plus 2’s rigid fork.

Thumb throttle capabilities allow riders to take a break from pedaling and let the bike do most of the work. Simply throttle down on Abound and enjoy the ride.

Integrated lights with built-in turn signals - Elevate your riding confidence with state-of-the-art safety technology. Clearly communicate day or night as you navigate beyond the bike lane.

Trek Powerfly 4 Gen 4 vs Aventon Aventure.2

Avoid high cost headaches by purchasing Aventon’s Aventure.2 at $1,999 price tag vs Trek’s Powerfly 4 Gen4’s at $3,650. That’s twice the price. A Trek rider expressed frustration when his bike wouldn’t charge saying, “Trek doesn’t handle warranty on battery or motor” leaving it to the shop and motor company to handle it.

Aventon’s Aventure.2 is fully covered under the brand’s 2-year warranty. It also touts a more powerful motor with 720 watts, a 28 mph top speed and plenty of great features, including 4” fat tires for stability and state-of-the-art tech such as its built-in turn signals.

Aventure.2 is a robust, and powerful all-terrain ebike, with:

$1,999 price tag vs Powerfly 4 Gen 4’s $3,650 , saving you nearly 50% on total cost.

A powerful 720 watt motor that offers 66% more power than the Powerfly 4 Gen 4’s 250 watt motor.

Top speed of 28 mph and up to 60 miles in range ensures you go 29% faster than the Powerfly 4 Gen 4 without the worry of ‘range anxiety’ on your next adventure.

Integrated lights with built-in turn signals boosts riding confidence with cutting-edge safety technology. Communicate clearly, day or night, from on the bike lane or on your next off-road adventure with Aventure.2.

Thumb throttle capabilities allow riders to take a break from pedaling and let the bike do most of the work. Simply throttle down on Aventure.2 and enjoy the views.

4” fat tires can roll over rock, roots, and other rough terrain with ease while promoting stable riding on and off the road.

Related Articles

Best Budget Ebikes

10 Best Electric Bikes of 2024

• Category: The 'Aventure' Crew | Blog
• Comments: 0

Please note, comments must be approved before they are published

7 Best Canadian Electric Bikes of 2024

7 Best Ebikes for Heavy Riders in 2024: Fat Tire, Cargo, and More

7 Best Pedal Assist Bikes in 2024: Cargo, Cruiser, Mountain, & More

Stay up-to-date on all things Aventon when they happen.

• Get Email Updates
• Get SMS Updates
• Affirm Financing
• Cancelation Policy
• Cookie Preferences
• Register My Bike
• Return Policy
• Shipping Info
• Accessibility

Electric Bikes

• All Electric Bikes
• Commuting Ebikes
• Fat Tire Ebikes
• Folding Ebikes
• Mid Drive Ebikes
• Road Ebikes
• Step-Through Ebikes
• Accessories
• Compare Ebikes
• Electric Bike Safety
• Beyond The Bike
• Electric Bike Dealers
• Become a Dealer
• Affiliate Program
• Recall Information

© 2024 Aventon Bikes . All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Service  

• Mountain Biking
• Buyer’s Guide
• Gear Reviews
• Rides+Events
• Training Guide
• Maintenance

The new Trek CarBack radar and light vs. the Garmin Varia

A look at how each device looks out for you.

I’ve been a radar rider for four years. I like it, especially out of the city, where a car can truly sneak up on you if the wind or acoustics of an area are just right. The devices I’m most familiar with are by Garmin. Since I’m always keen to try something new, I thought it would be fun to compare the new Trek CarBack with the Varia RCT715.

Introducing the new Trek CarBack

Trek’s CarBack is the company’s first go at a radar and light. It works with most cycling computers. I connected it without any trouble to a Garmin Edge 540 Solar, Edge 530 and Wahoo Elemnt Roam v1. Later on, I’ll get into the details about how the CarBack behaved with each head unit.

The radar unit comes with a USB-C charging cable and a mounting strap. The mounting strap worked well with round and flat-back seatposts. Trek says it works with aero seatposts, too. I haven’t been able to check that out yet, but I’m not so sure about that claim. The rubber straps don’t seem to have enough stretch for a deep seatpost. There’s also a Blendr mount for connecting the radar to a Bontrager saddle. That’s probably the best way to run the CarBack on your Madone.

It has four light modes: day steady (maximum 25 lumens), day flash (90-lumen bursts), night steady (5 lumens) and night flash (5-lumen bursts).

Like Garmin, Trek has a specific app that lets you get radar alerts on your phone. The Trek app has just been released so I’ll let you know my thoughts on that in the long-term review.

Here are some key specs for the CarBack, as well as the Garmin Varia RCT715 and Varia RTL515. Two things to note: the RCT715 is bigger because it not only has a light and radar, but a camera. Second thing: I verified the light settings, weight and dimensions of the CarBack and the RCT715 because I have those units on-hand. The rest of the figures come from the companies themselves.

Trek CarBack battery life

With the Trek CarBack, I get close to seven hours of battery life. Throughout that time, I don’t stick with one flash setting but select whichever one is best for the riding conditions. In similar circumstances, I get four to five hours out of the Varia RCT715.

Trek says it takes three and a half to four hours to charge the device’s battery from dead to full. I ran it down to a charge of five to 25 per cent (one light of four indicating battery life), and got it charged to about 50 to 75 per cent (three lights) in about an hour and a half. It was fully charged in about two and a half hours.

How the Trek CarBack behaves with different head units

I paired the CarBack with the Edge 530 and the Varia RCT715 with the Edge 540. I rode around, then switched the radars among the Garmin head units. In each case, the Varia would mostly alert me to an approaching vehicle about a half to a full second before the CarBack did.

Next, I put the Varia on a Wahoo Elemnt Roam and the CarBack on the Edge 540 to see what that would show. Generally, the Varia was quicker on the draw when detecting a car within 140 m, a range that both radar devices could handle. For the farther stuff, naturally, the CarBack alerted me as it’s scanning all the way back to 240 m.

I then played around with the Varia on Edge units (both Varia/Edge combos seemed identical in their behaviour) while the CarBack was on the Elemnt Roam. Sometimes the CarBack would notice a vehicle before the Varia. Other times it wouldn’t. There were a few ties, too.

The CarBack “clears” cars sooner. Remember, once a radar detects a vehicle, the head unit it’s paired with beeps, and then displays a combination of lights and icons to indicate the car’s approach. Once the car passes, the head-unit screen returns to its default display. The CarBack usually indicated a car had passed sooner than the Varia, regardless of the head unit it was paired with. I should be clear here: the CarBack was never wrong when it said the cars were gone. The Varia is a more cautious device, sometimes indicating there’s a vehicle behind even when I could clearly see it had moved ahead of me. You might say the CarBack is more accurate in this regard.

Trek says that CarBack’s detection zone widens behind you. From the radar device to 50 m behind your bike, the CarBack is capturing movement 15 m to the left and 15 m to the right. From 50 to 100 m behind, the field is about 20 m left and right. From 100 m to 240 m, the limit of the CarBack’s range, the detection area is at its widest: 30 m to the right and left. Only once did a car sneak in behind me. It had made a left-hand turn, arriving on my road at my seven o’clock—my blind spot if I was in a car. I don’t want to make too much of this miss. Afterall, radars are not infallible. As I mentioned, I’ve used the Garmin radars for years. Throughout that time, I’ve noticed that on roads with a lot of ups and downs and/or bends, a car can get pretty close to me before the radar picks it up.

Another thing I’ve noticed, and that’s hard to quantify, is that the Varia RCT715 seems a bit “chattier” than the CarBack. Here’s an example. I was on a bike path that ran parallel to a fast and busy four-lane road. The path was around 5 m to the right of the traffic, separated by a raised curb and a grass strip. Yet, the traffic had the Varia and my head unit pinging. There were cars around, sure, but nothing coming at me. The CarBack was quiet. It seems to have less of the Varia’s cry-wolf factor, which is a good thing. If you think your device is behaving like the boy in the fable, you won’t pay attention to it as much as you should.

The Varia is more likely to be set off by other cyclists and pedestrians.

Finally, note that with a Garmin computer, you can control the light settings of the CarBack. You can even set it to auto, and let the head unit manage the light. The Wahoo doesn’t offer that functionality. While you’ll get radar alerts displayed on the Elemnt, you’ll have to reach back and push the button on the CarBack to find the light setting you want.

There’s an app for the CarBack

I got a CarBack before launch, but not its smartphone app. I’ve just downloaded it and snagged a few screen grabs. On a head unit, dots or car icons indicate the in-coming cars in a bar to the side of the screen. The Trek app gives a richer picture of where the cars are in relation to you, not just how far back, but laterally when vehicles are 75 m or closer. Head units don’t show if a car is to left or to the right of you.

First thoughts on the Trek CarBack

I do like the CarBack’s compact size. Afterall, the Varia RCT715 is a bit of a chunky monkey. (That’s what you get if you want video.) The better battery life of the Trek device is a boon, too. The Varia has occasional drop outs. I did not notice any with the CarBack; its connection with all the head units was strong and consistent. I am intrigued by how a radar’s performance changes somewhat depending on the head unit it’s paired with. As I continue to use the Trek CarBack , I plan to match it with other bike computers, as well as its app. I’ll let you know what I detect.

• Email address: *
• Email This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Cooper Discoverer Rugged Trek vs AT3 XLT

Both of these tires are although all-terrain, they are sub-categorized in to different channels. The Cooper Discoverer Rugged Trek is considered a hybrid, carrying mud-terrain like shoulders, where the Cooper AT3 is a good old, all-terrain tire. Though besides being so different, both of these tires offer a great balance of performance and comfort. So which one is better for you? Well lets find out!

So the Cooper Discoverer AT3 (considering XLT variant), comes with 32 sizes in 15 to 20 inches rims, having following specs.

• They have speed ratings of either R or S.
• Load range: C to F.
• Weight range: 44 lbs to 70 lbs.
• Tread depth is seen to be either 16.5 or 17/32″ in all sizes.
• All sizes have 60k miles warranty.

Detailed Review of Cooper AT3 XLT : https://tiredriver.com/cooper-discoverer-at3-review/

While the Cooper Rugged Trek only offering 18 sizes (in 16 to 20″), comes with following specs.

• All have speed ratings in either T or Q.
• Load rating: SL, XL, E and F.
• Tire weight goes form 40 lbs to 70 lbs.
• Tread depth: Either 16/32″ or 18.5/32″.
• LT sizes have 55k miles warranty, while others have 65k.

Both tires have 3PMSF and M+S winter ratings.

Tread Design

Starting with Cooper Discoverer AT3, this tire comes with traditional 5 rib structure.

The 3 ribs in the middle form 4 zigzag longitudinal channels, where the outer ones (along with shoulders) are relatively wider.

All these ribs have lugs (in pairs, joined up with each other with connectors, underneath).

These squared-off blocks feature full depth wave-like sipes, and off-set edges, and their lateral gaps act as in-groove biters.

The shoulder lugs are a little bigger, though they carry similar features, like sipes, foundational supports, and connectors in between.

But yes, they also have snow vices facing the lugs in the middle.

Furthermore, these shoulder blocks have staggered margins (with mud scoops), and they form thick sidewall lug

Note: The sidewall lugs are the main features which differentiates the Cooper AT3 XLT, from the Discoverer LT and the Discoverer AT3 4S (review).

The Cooper Rugged Trek on the other hand is much more aggressive.

It’s central pattern consist of interlocking lugs with wider tread voids.

All these lugs carry Y shaped interlocking (full depth) sipes, sharp edges, notches and reinforced foundations.

Moreover they also carry snow vices facing the shoulder blocks.

Speaking of which, shoulder blocks are elongated, and have more biting edges (where prominent notches are off-sets are seen).

They are also staggered/serrated, where they form thicker mud scoops compared to AT3.

Moreover, you also get dual sidewall lugs on this tire as well, which are again thicker compared to it’s little brother.

Pavement Performance

Assessing the dry performance of an all-terrain tire necessitates an evaluation of its traction, steering, and cornering attributes. Let’s talk about them one by one.

Directional Grip

Directional grip, examines a tire’s performance on straight roads, that’s why it gets calculated by braking distances and acceleration times.

And as, when a tire’s run straight, its central tread connects with the road more firmly it makes sense why out of both tires here, the Cooper Discoverer AT3 gets to be better, showing up 5 feet shorter braking efficacy.

Besides having more densely packed lugs there, it also features longitudinal alignment of these blocks, along with reinforced foundations underneath them. So you get superior grip combined with stability.

In contrast, the Cooper Discoverer Rugged Trek, with its chunky design and widely spaced lugs, falls short here.

Lateral Traction

Lateral traction, essential for cornering, hinges on the connection between the outer shoulder lugs of the tire and the ground. This is because, as the tire turns, the vehicle’s entire weight shifts there, due to inertia.

And so given the wider grooves on its shoulders, the Cooper Discoverer Rugged Trek performs less impressively in this aspect.

Conversely, the Cooper AT3, features packed up shoulders having strong connectors in between, allowing for greater lateral g-forces and superior handling times.

Handling Response

The overall responsiveness indicates how promptly a tire reacts to steering inputs, a factor largely influenced by the tire’s overall weight and structure.

And so the Cooper Rugged Trek’s lacking performance here can be explained by its greater tread depth, and aggressive shoulder pattern.

Both of these factors basically allow for greater lug bending as the tire corners, resulting in a less reliable balance between under and over steering, which of course results in slower feedback.

The Cooper Discoverer AT3 on the other hand, keeps its lug to road connection firmer, giving you a more direct steering.

Wet Performance

Achieving solid traction on wet roads hinges on the interplay between siping and flexibility. This is because sipes are slits which contract/expand to create suction for water particles, coming underneath. And so besides needing ample of these slits, they must also be “flexible” enough.

Given this, it is expected that the Cooper Discoverer Rugged Trek, is a lacking tire here, with fewer sipes, having a stiffer rubber composition.

On the flip side, the Cooper AT3 not only features a higher number of sipes, but they have better structure to them as well, along with tread flexibility.

This tread flexibility also account for superior hydroplaning resistance, as it creates (a better) negative pressure for the water, as it gushes out of the grooves at a faster rate. So you get better float speeds on both curved and straight aqua tests.

Fuel Efficiency

Although the difference in fuel economy is pretty low, when comparing these tires, it still adds up to a lot in the long run. So its still very crucial.

So let me explain why, Cooper Discoverer AT3 comes out better here, despite both tires having similar weighing sizes (on average).

The tire for one, has longitudinally aligned lugs, which roll with more ease.

And with closed up tread voids, lugs aren’t pressed against the road with as much pressure. So less rolling resistance gets generated.

Moreover, with shallower tread depth, all its lugs don’t face as much flexing, with the tire cornering, or braking, so minimum amount of energy gets wasted.

Contrarily, the Cooper Discoverer Rugged Trek, with its wider grooves, exerts more pressure on each lug (as the weight is distributed over fewer blocks). And its unsupported lugs flex during turns, braking, and acceleration, wasting energy and consequently consuming more fuel.

Two main factors contribute to overall ride comfort, tread noise and bump absorption, and the Cooper AT3 excels in both.

Noise generation is tied to the tire’s tread design, the balder the tire, the more air particles ricochet, creating noise. Hence, the Cooper Discoverer AT3, with its compact design, prevails in this regard.

Moreover, thanks to its softer compound compared to the Cooper Rugged Trek, it also get to be superior in absorbing road imperfections, further enhancing the comfort of the ride.

Winter Performance

In snowy conditions, all-terrain tires (for the most part) carry/or try to carry, winter tire characteristics, employing a softer rubber, slimmer profile, and abundant biters.

These design elements aim to capture snow particles and lodge them in the grooves to facilitate snow-to-snow contact (as snow sticks more with each other, compared to rubber).

And considering that, I must say, you can’t go wrong with either one of these tires here, both of which have 3 Peak Mountain Snowflake (3PMSF) ratings.

Both tires sport a narrower design and provide an array of biters, including snow vices and interlocking sipes all over the tread.

Sand Traction

Optimum traction on sandy terrain necessitates tires to have maximum flotation and minimal digging abilities, which explains the common practice of reducing air pressure on this soft terrain type.

And here the Cooper Rugged Trek takes the lead with its dual sidewalls.

Although both tires get to have similar weighing structures, the Cooper AT3 with smaller sidewall lugs, still isn’t able to produce as much contact patch with the sand, with reduced air pressure.

Gripping on Mud

On mud you need two things, faster evacuation and momentum, and both of these are better on Cooper RT.

The tire has bigger mud scoops combined with elongated sidewall lugs, which paddle its way out of the thick mud with no trouble.

And it’s much wider tread voids, and interlocking central lugs, with bold stone ejectors, provide superior mud cleaning in all directions.

Conversely, the Cooper AT3 struggles with its circumferential ribs, mostly hindering sufficient mud evacuation, through sideways.

Climbing Rocks

Climbing rocks demands biting abilities from all directions and robust internal and external construction, in tires.

And Cooper Rugged Trek shines in both.

If I talk durability first, yes sure, it has 2 ply sidewalls just like its little brother, but the thicker lugs on top, still provide slightly greater toughness to the tire, nonetheless.

And in terms of biters, it’s interlocking lugs are much better in providing multi-angled grip too.

Moreover, its dual sidewall lugs, further add to its overall gripping efficacy, with lowered air pressure, as they get to flex better, and provide (relatively) larger footprint with the rocky surface, compared to Cooper Discoverer AT3.

Both tires display impressive performance in various conditions, each having its unique strengths and weaknesses.

The Cooper AT3 shines on pavements, in terms of fuel economy, tread life and comfort. And you get a much better steering response, directional grip and lateral traction with this tire on both, wet and dry environments.

On the other side, the Cooper Rugged Trek offers greater self cleaning grooves, allowing for better mud traction. And its dual sidewall lugs supply much better rocky and sandy terrain traction as well.

Though both tires show up with similar performance values when it comes to winter performance.

A Personal Request from TireDriver.com, Ozmen:

The recent updates to Google's algorithm have significantly impacted my website, TireDriver.com, presenting challenges in maintaining the site amidst declining revenue. As the sole curator of content that I strive to make both insightful and useful, I’m reaching out to ask for your support. If you value what you’ve read here, please help by sharing it with others.

Below, you’ll find one-click links for easy sharing. Your support in spreading the word truly makes a difference and is deeply appreciated!

• Share on Facebook
• Share on Twitter
• Share on LinkedIn
• Share on Reddit
• Share on WhatsApp
• Simply Copy This Link

Thank you for your support!

Want to Help Further? Shop Through My Links:

If you appreciate my content and wish to support me further, consider making your next tire purchase through my affiliate links. When you buy from these links, I earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This helps me continue to provide valuable content and keep TireDriver.com running.

• Shop at Discount Tire
• Find Your Tires at Tire Rack
• Get Great Deals at Simple Tire

Your support through these links is highly valued and greatly appreciated!

3 thoughts on “Cooper Discoverer Rugged Trek vs AT3 XLT”

Why all the hate on the rugged treks?

I apologize if the content seemed biased against the Cooper Discoverer Rugged Trek. It is not my intention to spread hate but to provide an unbiased review based on various factors including performance, durability, and user feedback. Though, I appreciate your feedback.

Ozmen. No need for an apology nor did you seem biased against the Cooper Discoverer RT. This is my second reading of your tire reviews: excellent and objective advice. Keep up the great reviews.

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Hi Folks. I'm Ozmen, and I work as a tire designer. I understand finding a tire isn't easy, as there are so many variables involved. But with me around, tire selection would never bother you again.

• Forum Listing
• Marketplace
• Advanced Search
• Mountain Bike Manufacturer Forums
• Bike Manufacturers

Trek Single Track?

• Add to quote

I was looking for a bicycle for my wife & came across a used one advertised as a "Trek Single Track". The seller tells me that "Single Track" is the model although I can't seem to find it anywhere (Trek catalog, web site or here at mtb review). Does anyone out there know if there is such a Trek model & if so, does it go by any other name? Appreciatively, Scott  

Trek 930 SingleTrack I don't think they make it any longer, but my hardtail mountain bike is a Trek 930 SHK Single Track, Have had mine for 5 years and would love to buy another one just like it. Which is why I am here right now. Tough to find current models with Chro-Moly in that price range.  

scotte1 said: The seller tells me that "Single Track" is the model although I can't seem to find it anywhere Click to expand...

Trek made a lot of models called single track for a long time. Had an early one that was a 970 singletrack, it was pretty far up the line up as it was tripple butted cromo, and i believe it was the last of the fully lugged frames. It was my first serious mt bike. Jim  

times were (1993-98?) that the 900 numbered models (930-950-970-990) were "singletracks" with the 930 probly the most popular. all pretty good, usa built, cromo bikes tho not all models shared the same tubing. 800 series models were "mountain tracks" and of somewhat lesser quality cromo frames. hope this helps.  

scotte1 said: I was looking for a bicycle for my wife & came across a used one advertised as a "Trek Single Track". The seller tells me that "Single Track" is the model although I can't seem to find it anywhere (Trek catalog, web site or here at mtb review). Does anyone out there know if there is such a Trek model & if so, does it go by any other name? Appreciatively, Scott Click to expand...

Can I put a set of rock shox judy's on this bike? I have a Single Track and a set of shox I was thinking about combining. I didnt get any papers with the shox so im just looking for info online.  

ROCKHOPPER703 said: Can I put a set of rock shox judy's on this bike? I have a Single Track and a set of shox I was thinking about combining. I didnt get any papers with the shox so im just looking for info online. Click to expand...

My parents have a trek single track 950 and a trek zx 7000 accept they both need repairs so I cant really use them.  

• ?            
• 15.5M posts
• 520.8K members

Top Contributors this Month

‘Joker 2’ New Trailer: Lady Gaga and Joaquin Phoenix Sing, Dance and Create Absolute Chaos in ‘Folie à Deux’ Sequel

By Caroline Brew

Caroline Brew

• ‘Joker 2’ New Trailer: Lady Gaga and Joaquin Phoenix Sing, Dance and Create Absolute Chaos in ‘Folie à Deux’ Sequel 3 days ago
• ‘The Bear’ Season 3 Teaser: Jeremy Allen White Is Back in the Kitchen as FX Announces Premiere Date 3 months ago
• ‘Mufasa: The Lion King’ Trailer: Disney Prequel Follows Young Mufasa and Scar as Blue Ivy Carter Joins Voice Cast 3 months ago

Joaquin Phoenix and Lady Gaga are causing chaos as Joker and Harley Quinn in the latest trailer for Warner Bros. and DC ‘s “ Joker: Folie à Deux ,” the sequel to 2019’s “Joker.” The film is set to release in theaters on Oct. 4, 2024 after world premiering in competition at the Venice Film Festival, where the first movie won the Golden Lion in 2019.

Related Stories

Growing globalization of production spells trouble for hollywood, eminem reps for detroit in the cole bennett-directed video for 'tobey' featuring big sean and babytron, popular on variety.

Addressing the movie’s musical components, Beetz told Variety : “I think people will be surprised. I don’t think it’s going to be what they expect, around it being musical. We all sort of express musically and dancing in our lives day-to-day. I think it’s going to work really well.”

“Joker: Folie à Deux” will be separate from the other upcoming films from DC Studios co-CEOs James Gunn and Peter Safran’s slate, like “Superman,” and exist in its own separate world. The same goes for Matt Reeves’ “The Batman: Part II,” which tells its own standalone story. Gaga’s Harley Quinn will exist separately from Margot Robbie’s character, seen in “Birds of Prey” and “The Suicide Squad,” and Kaley Cuoco’s animated character from the Max series.

Todd Phillips returns as director of “Joker: Folie à Deux.” He co-wrote the script with Scott Silver and produced the film with Bradley Cooper.

Watch the full trailer below.

More from Variety

‘amelie,’ ‘the intouchables’ will be re-released with english subtitles during olympic games, why is bytedance considering a move that burned so many tech giants, ‘the invasion’ review: sergei loznitsa’s raw but restrained reflection on life during wartime, cannes award winner ‘grand tour’ travels to several additional territories, why verizon’s latest play could make it the netflix of streaming bundlers, french entertainment industry relieved over defeat of far right in pivotal elections, but a fragmented political landscape remains, more from our brands, woman details decades-old sexual assault allegations against axl rose, orlando bloom painted this l.a. mansion black. now it can be yours for $5 million., ncaa house settlement handed to judge as reviews, challenges loom, the best loofahs and body scrubbers, according to dermatologists, twd: dead city season 2 sneak peek reunites negan and lucille — plus, animal kingdom vet joins cast.